EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

y .rI •.4 g^^ ^^y 11 2,39 239 103f^86 10:16 t^.C=JILLSIE PL.0.4 F8^ 13Rr/36. 13:17 N1C-WI LLSIE W.Om qm .E SFP R4 IN RECEIVED DOE-RL "T 7W WM DIVISION RECEI'iED DOE-RL --T 710 MI. DIVISION N Although NRC staff does not pre uape the disposal of HLN, in situ,. in the Hanford tanks, we believe eSWishi ng the feasibility at Luc motel as technically adequate to p rotect the public health and the environment will be Z . Z . 18 ex
' 2 9^ +ir. ^ q k of ^^ 1e.137,e6 19:14 fk3 G3>7 rrxîusle w.DaT ®e- twar^ to: ie Hs-wlttsie H0. W3 DOE Ned J RECLvED DOE.RL N) 00 kcCEVcD DOE-RL 1 _ GENERAL COPSENTS °T 7 1766 i% DNISION It 1s stated In the GELS (P• 1) that the purpose of the EIS is m et p rovi de envtronmental input Into the selection a nd implementation of the final disposal actions for high-level, transuranic and tank wastes located at the Hanford Slte. e The document ones on to ste ps that the LEIS is n orth a propruamati c EIS Intended to support bread decisions with respect to the df spou7 sttatepies for the Hanford waste" and man imp lamentation EIS Intend" to provide project specific environmental input for decisions an moving forward with Certain a. xfi i) 2,5v2 Pubifntl.e cf i the sFinal il EIS the DOEDwvi ubegtgmedteetion of a e Hanfe drag Defense Mute final disposal strategy which will be documented fn one or an " Records of Decision. The ODE aay decide to proceed with implementing certain pens of the strategywhtie del wing final decision on other pa Me pending 'urther resea rc h and development (p. x111). This approach nabs the review of the document difficult because It is unclear Mich areas will receiW additional research and development and how the results of these research a" p development effort, will be factored into the be isionwaklrag process, The 2.3. 2 m 3 DEIS indicates that further NEPA review is ahtici paten to support certain other specific activities prior to their implementation but' one dOcirit t does not indicate which activities Nis would apply to, what the additional review would consist of, or when it would occur. The NRC s ta ff recommends that the Final EIS clearly identify which decisions will he postponed pending Completion of additional r se.,ch...d development, when these activities a re ii kely to des cmapLted, and the typ e of NEPA r1elM that Is anticipated. The NRC ....a, .dN WE .Hat s .... al or,., re quire additional eesearch and 3.3.5.3 development prior to arcking decisions concerning the disp ... I of the Hanford wastes, These inel we (1) characterization of the wa stes In the . Inyle-0.11 Unks, (2) long-t rm performance of the proteete lv barrier systn; (3) s geochewical characteristics of the st te; and (4) develop me nt of analytical .capabilities for projecting was te t ra nspo rt ... Each of them is discuss" below. CharaoceMSation of stnele-sb11 tank watt. The MIS notes ( p , 3.5), and the NRC s ta ff . agrees, that additional aba recte riratlon of wastes in the single-shell tanks will be necessa ry to provide mere detailed information about waste I....toriei The NIC .,.Me 2.3.2 that the .1 wastes also be characterized, to the extent practicable, by their sou rces in fuel reprocessing operations. If, for evanole, certain tanks contain wastes from the operation of the first cycle solvent extraction syseM, thin these wester would clearly W conside red me high-level waste. However, If zone of the sa les brm.IH predoel ... sly Inclden ta l vestes such as cL"1ng removal wastes or org anic wash wastes, and If th e radionucli de conant 1.ttnn 1 In these wastes are compa ra ble off Other low-level wastes, these was te s night not he p roperly classifi ed as high-level wastes . --T 7%6 2 :?.'.DIVISION After the completion of the waste characterization program, the NRC recommends that the selection of a disposal alternative be made on a tank-by-tank basis. Irfo„natlon prentad me in Appendix A (Tables A.4 aM A1) of the LEIS suggests 3.1.4.1 that a large fraction of the total curie Inventory of 114111-shell tank vast., nay M contained to only a few tanks. If this is accurate, .• substantial fraction of thetotal radionuclide Inventory Could be retrieved at only a small fraction of the cost presented I, the DEIS. Furthermore, If Some or all of the 3.1.4.5 tanks with large Inventories see in sound ..edition and do not leek, wastes cold he retrieved by sluicing, further reducing N, cost of waste retrieval. Ir swma ry ,the NRC agree, that a"ftioM1 nste ch.r.ct lif.tt ., should be Comp leted order to (E) properly classif y Wises as high-level or nor-high-level, I and (2) permit selection of A 411"fil alternative which Is ,lost appropriate for each tank of waste . Lono-Leer perfoMinte of Protective barrier system As noted In the DEIS ( p . 1.14), the protective barrier a" msrkar system 1 1 the key to effectively Ieplatlrg free the environnt me vast., that are dis p osed or .3.5.1. our-mrface. 1 two of the three disposal .)t&natives that an considered In one DEIS (I e., the in-place stabilization altern at ive and the reference alternattv,) S rely heavily on the capability of the , proposed protective barrier ystem to minlmlu water infiltraticd and th e"utm the likelihood of plant, animal, and human intrWicn. Indeed, It 1 1 01 viewof the NRC that r esurface disposal of many of the Hanfo rd wastes would likel y pose unacceptable risks to public health and „fety unless substantial protec rich is provided by such barriers. The WE'acknowl"oes (DEIS, P . H.2) 'that a specific barrier design bas not yet hearet dihni ec.- the DEIS further notes that the WE will conduct a NEPA revive of the final sneciflc barrier to evaluate Its C anticipated performance as d . t ed and its . f e ce under perturbed onditions This review is In be based on actual l b ratory and field data. The NRC encourages the WE to conduct them further studies to resolve uncertainties with respect to the effectiveness of the barriers Our detailed ants list s ome of the aspects of barrier design end perfere.hr . voice .nmld be add re ss ed Ie these t" it s. 3 5 1 . 57
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3 and 4:
I 217 Kee '4' 3 Jolen fV p 2 . 2 .1
Page 5 and 6:
3 i" F 'M 5Y 5 Jolene ân.oeld Pan.
Page 7 and 8:
j 5 ag WA6C0-6HERMAN PUBLIC HEALTH
Page 9 and 10:
4} 0^ ^ "I f% .J DEFENSE vs. COMMER
Page 11 and 12:
£ • 9' Z • £ 1.-p, I.nTH p?uw
Page 13 and 14:
~^{ 8 „* me 221 S tZc.^...at By 1
Page 15 and 16:
nab IB>1oVaa1 s,+ooen..O c 3 %1ON3d
Page 17 and 18:
F' "q ` 3' 22 3 The state of Washin
Page 19 and 20:
-p. .IV as avpnap m 3,,S, V+!^+ IT.
Page 21 and 22:
-ZI- {. T ' T ' V ' OT'T'b'Z J-V e
Page 23 and 24:
ILsÔ 3 .3.1. 1 B 1966 62: 5 In the
Page 25 and 26:
€ 223 223 .^nry Wr^v (^.. c^!3 a
Page 27 and 28:
223 f` n A V fT duly 29, 1986 Paget
Page 29 and 30:
ZQM 223 July 29, 1986 Page 5 'July2
Page 31 and 32:
El -V ZPY i'9,T'£ S3lamas PuoFaev
Page 33 and 34:
hn of 223 223 o-,mw ttîlt' . ' STA
Page 35 and 36:
f d ^ z3 X23 11 zt^ is iti.,A.13 AU
Page 37 and 38:
. 223 oo M 3.5.4.6 3.5.1.8 -amP, wo
Page 39 and 40:
X23 223 A9u 8 ty86 02 ..'tl,: 8 I5'
Page 41 and 42:
223 a O 3.5.1.11 3.5.1.13 3.5..1.36
Page 43 and 44:
F 0 P 6 f 3 'u?3 d O AZ 3 Revise of
Page 45 and 46:
223 223 Review of Haefocd 0efense W
Page 47 and 48:
Revie o£ HanfoM Defen,ê waats Its
Page 50 and 51:
lD
Page 52 and 53:
t 5 4 0 9 â tiô L AU, 8 1966 Ali-
Page 54 and 55:
;ex a^ 220.3 PAIM isl O w 2.5.5 3 .
Page 56 and 57:
1 _ e ' ^1 0 9 La Z2A_3 Nw 3.1.6.1
Page 58 and 59:
Eq k 3 °. 11y x,s,—p, 1 rEaa^.se
Page 60 and 61:
2 23 223
Page 62 and 63:
,F 3 a w # €^ f 223 August 1, 198
Page 64 and 65:
6 7 /III23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Techni
Page 66 and 67:
LJ it-fâ r 223 For USDOE, we have
Page 68 and 69:
k 223 223 CHAPTER 2 VOLUME I REVIEW
Page 70 and 71:
w7.,rg r. 223 Qsssign; None. Gn I.0
Page 72 and 73:
VJ 223 223 1011. What alternatives
Page 74 and 75:
,Cw^V 2293 5.3 IN-PLACE STABILIZATI
Page 76 and 77:
3- 223 223 strontium fluoride. The
Page 78 and 79:
. 3 B-B in vi ea of the potential p
Page 80 and 81:
1 a 0 Olk 223 22.3 (P N W W N 4- i>
Page 82 and 83:
aft y 0 t 3 'Af Awa2^3 223 conditio
Page 84 and 85:
z 0223 223 3.5.1.72 a) Can the data
Page 86 and 87:
_y - 2 f F 7 All 223 223 W (Jl 3.5.
Page 88 and 89:
z 223 223 The assumptions of 0.5 an
Page 90 and 91:
# 4 a 22.1 223 P-6 Why was it assum
Page 92 and 93:
1 6,23 223 (T1 A 1- 3.5.6.25 3.5.6.
Page 94 and 95:
,^ r= 22 3 223 OoeXtions None. APPE
Page 96 and 97:
3:+nCr3 223 4.2.23 Page F.19 Refere
Page 98 and 99:
3.5.1.45 3.5.1.46 3.5.1.47 Page M.9
Page 100 and 101:
zr 9 ^ a ^,^ 3 à 61) 223 4.2.45 th
Page 102 and 103:
0 REFI,cNCE CHECKS (I) DRAFT ENVIRO
Page 104 and 105:
M 7. 223 Ref. No. Year Reference. 1
Page 106 and 107:
223 C Ref. No, Year Reference EIS P
Page 108 and 109:
n qÂ 223 Reference Reference Ref.
Page 110 and 111:
223 Raf 26.14 26.15 26.16 26.11 26.
Page 112 and 113:
a € ^+ I r, 22 d 225 Resolution N
Page 114 and 115:
1 229 TO Rich ualten/ IS L S Dept o
Page 116:
^ t 9 ;9 Fq 6 p 4^$ p9 S4 # 8 to '?
Page 119 and 120:
1 1 7 4 ' 0 1 6'_1 q 231 - In1946 a
Page 121 and 122:
.: a d . 9 231 231 2.4.2.2 v O 2.4.
Page 123 and 124:
f 3 a ""10975 In V fV EXECUTIVE SUM
Page 125 and 126:
g2 231 231 oaa, ^_ ° = 6a3, 3 .2.4
Page 127 and 128: — t '113 i C0MMENTS ON APPENDIX M
Page 129 and 130: p gg - J k 2 a ^ ^,? 6 k ^ 231 231
Page 131 and 132: h - y 1 - _^ 3 .LLw S f â-
Page 133 and 134: 7 4-11 231 231 Da Me tollosawl CQMM
Page 135 and 136: SL iL _. .. _. '98ieyaav Salem - pu
Page 137 and 138: 231 231 4.2.55 11. On page R.90, "1
Page 139 and 140: l(,iIÎN OGl3.N Representative Dean
Page 141 and 142: xm ._ 233 233 Flh stra[t - Isola .f
Page 143 and 144: a 233 ^:^373 sur dais waste may be
Page 145 and 146: a X33 M3 was to be retrievable {or
Page 147 and 148: 233 X33 09133 by DOE to meet the
Page 149 and 150: e t t - 1- 233 23E3 4. DOE self-reg
Page 151 and 152: 233 23,3 rent releases to the Colum
Page 153 and 154: 233 233 TCt IJ. P. 1.15. The nuclea
Page 155 and 156: 233 233 .__ : , sa â33 6, 33 Manag
Page 157 and 158: i 1 3^'3 4 234 REVIEW OF DRAFT ENY3
Page 159 and 160: s l i . - - - RAECUSIVE SUM9IARY -
Page 161 and 162: i w 3 € ^4 e ',st ^. 23< 23= COMM
Page 163 and 164: 1 0 1` 1°3 234 23^ COMMENTS ON APP
Page 165 and 166: 234 234 3.3.5.9 3.3.5.9 4. On page
Page 167 and 168: 4 23< _ p33¢ 3.2.6.5 15. No mentio
Page 169 and 170: p y y9 }{45 'FF i E x ?:Y 234 23 t
Page 171 and 172: 3 = ! Ol N O COMMENTS ON APPENDIX R
Page 173 and 174: 2341 23 N N 3.5.6.41 COMMPMTS ON AP
Page 175 and 176: 3° N £ski hd' 236 .^. ^ G C t 1,
Page 177: " ^3 3 239 109!/96 19:15 NAC 11LETE
Page 181 and 182: a 5 a ( aY 12139 239 61 W 0 SBr9Yn3
Page 183 and 184: ' 239 e^ Î(1^ pt 10/02.% I(im NK-W
Page 185 and 186: 10,07lew 10:31 NRC-41LLSiE w.0O4 BO
Page 187 and 188: E{r ti (v.a at,, .,,^ ; Sect 3. The
Page 189 and 190: If I $ ? 1 240 HE Aa_r wl NON BE 8.
Page 191 and 192: 240 240 2.4.1.4 2.4.1.6 RECEIVED DO
Page 193 and 194: IT N 240 240 RECE,,VED DOE-RL - -E-
Page 195 and 196: 9 -i 0L., , -1 240 2.4.1.9 1T A A 3
Page 197 and 198: S'Z'b'£ ^ â IMend'3oa 'UZI 9e61 g
Page 199 and 200: °7 a) 24 A. .h 3 6H 3.1.4.9 I.A NO
Page 201 and 202: N01
Page 203 and 204: NOISIAM WM 7C0 99&-9 L d3S 121-304
Page 205 and 206: 24021 246 -13- -I a- Cn Ul o gouTin
Page 207 and 208: NOISIAIO WM Kg gm 9t d3S NOISINOWM
Page 209 and 210: No1slAlawM =^"^ 98^ 9 L d35 OUT a s
Page 211 and 212: 2 ^ n 1. Y ^`^ a $ aa% wd A 5 -26-
Page 213 and 214: 2`$2 ME —a— T1BLE 1 V Each Isol
Page 215 and 216: NOISING WM ZbL^ 98d 9 L d3S Vn4 W}
Page 217 and 218: aN wu = ra . W .aa^. I mm[ad ye lx.
Page 219 and 220: . 1 1 1 :> I2^^^1'+./ N4 N RECEIVED
Page 221 and 222: s 1 4 1 1 242 240 WTE nn AAFA RECEI
Page 223 and 224: F ai 1 1 6 xs 2 i 0 7.«d 242 24A\/
Page 225 and 226: 2 2 242, c- V a RECEIVED DOE.RL - R
Page 227 and 228: 1 1741'')1079 2 i I ,v 0) V R) 4„
Page 229 and 230:
A 4 s . 11 tea. Pea` N Fes° RECEIV
Page 231 and 232:
s aTg 1, e-p Gs n Rr !Z i. ab N"yM
Page 233 and 234:
ka - 4 e j^` 2, 1. 2 0L." ENROSl.6:
Page 235 and 236:
.+nua .1 w mP it u_ IB-OZ-601 , 1 a
Page 237 and 238:
Z ,,j _ €v Z g f2" 02 RECEIVED DO
Page 239 and 240:
$. •.nl as a..IP ua'y i 1ww.we wJ
Page 241 and 242:
N'$ J 2413 2.4.1.1 2.2.1 2.3.2.3 M
Page 243 and 244:
RM 2.3.2.3 RECEIVED DOE-RL or, 18gN
Page 245 and 246:
! 1 1 0 2,13 243 1 4. 4. 8. P. 3.10
Page 247 and 248:
P° 1 24 3 #"' R:r_ ti3 _ 3.5.5.2 3
Page 249 and 250:
2 43 ON Ql t0 RECEIVED DOE-RL 1 4 n
show all

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?