EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
22 0"2 3<br />
PREFACE -<br />
This report provides review comments and questions related to the D<strong>EIS</strong><br />
entitled a i of r f i h: T n r f Wastes.<br />
As in any report : which is focused on oncerthinh es. or an conclusions which<br />
are subject to dispute, the report may appear to emphasize the negative -<br />
aspects of the D<strong>EIS</strong>. Questions are not asked, nor comments made, about<br />
areas with which we are in complete agreement.<br />
The D<strong>EIS</strong> is an. extensive document providing great detail about some<br />
very complex topics. It is obvious that it is tde product of a great deal<br />
of work. It is not surprising that q uestions woula arise over methodology or<br />
results in such a technical area. It is ho ped that. clarification by DUE of<br />
the questions raised here will enhance the value of a very important<br />
document.<br />
a<br />
N<br />
.While most environmental impact statements discuss the potential<br />
environmental here which could occur from a.preposec Project and discuss<br />
methods to nimize impacts. the defense waste protect is different. A<br />
,,elect sponsor. usually seeks to receive authorization for a project from<br />
permitting authorities who generally choose between denying the project,<br />
thereby avoiding impacts, or authorizing it with acceptable impacts. The<br />
authorities generally have the choice of denying a project one. avoids ng most<br />
impacts.<br />
Host defense-waste Dis posal at <strong>Hanford</strong>, however, has alreadyoccurred,<br />
and this <strong>EIS</strong> is intended to. discuss the best methods of cleanup and - —a•<br />
environmental p rotection far an action that has already happened. Thus, the !Z<br />
choice Divan here to decisionmakers is ict,lly . easier. All alternatives (D<br />
proposed by USDOE improve the environment at <strong>Hanford</strong> over • no action" and<br />
C3<br />
any uncertainty discussed hereinreflects. v<br />
mainly on the degree of - f+<br />
environmental improvement, not de gradation.. The uncertainties raised in<br />
this review affect the amount cfenvironmental improvement possible,. not —h<br />
whether environmental improvement willoccur.<br />
(D<br />
i1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
DISCLAIMER<br />
The product of this work effort is to be used by the State of Washington<br />
solely in the preparation of a comment letter to the U.S. Department of<br />
Energy (DDE) regarding the D<strong>EIS</strong> on Disposal of <strong>Hanford</strong> Defense Nigh-Level,<br />
Transuranic and Tank Wastes. The n,.d.ct of this work effort is not<br />
intended to be used in any other way. URS Corporation assumes no liability<br />
for use by others.