17.12.2013 Views

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 0"2 3<br />

PREFACE -<br />

This report provides review comments and questions related to the D<strong>EIS</strong><br />

entitled a i of r f i h: T n r f Wastes.<br />

As in any report : which is focused on oncerthinh es. or an conclusions which<br />

are subject to dispute, the report may appear to emphasize the negative -<br />

aspects of the D<strong>EIS</strong>. Questions are not asked, nor comments made, about<br />

areas with which we are in complete agreement.<br />

The D<strong>EIS</strong> is an. extensive document providing great detail about some<br />

very complex topics. It is obvious that it is tde product of a great deal<br />

of work. It is not surprising that q uestions woula arise over methodology or<br />

results in such a technical area. It is ho ped that. clarification by DUE of<br />

the questions raised here will enhance the value of a very important<br />

document.<br />

a<br />

N<br />

.While most environmental impact statements discuss the potential<br />

environmental here which could occur from a.preposec Project and discuss<br />

methods to nimize impacts. the defense waste protect is different. A<br />

,,elect sponsor. usually seeks to receive authorization for a project from<br />

permitting authorities who generally choose between denying the project,<br />

thereby avoiding impacts, or authorizing it with acceptable impacts. The<br />

authorities generally have the choice of denying a project one. avoids ng most<br />

impacts.<br />

Host defense-waste Dis posal at <strong>Hanford</strong>, however, has alreadyoccurred,<br />

and this <strong>EIS</strong> is intended to. discuss the best methods of cleanup and - —a•<br />

environmental p rotection far an action that has already happened. Thus, the !Z<br />

choice Divan here to decisionmakers is ict,lly . easier. All alternatives (D<br />

proposed by USDOE improve the environment at <strong>Hanford</strong> over • no action" and<br />

C3<br />

any uncertainty discussed hereinreflects. v<br />

mainly on the degree of - f+<br />

environmental improvement, not de gradation.. The uncertainties raised in<br />

this review affect the amount cfenvironmental improvement possible,. not —h<br />

whether environmental improvement willoccur.<br />

(D<br />

i1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

DISCLAIMER<br />

The product of this work effort is to be used by the State of Washington<br />

solely in the preparation of a comment letter to the U.S. Department of<br />

Energy (DDE) regarding the D<strong>EIS</strong> on Disposal of <strong>Hanford</strong> Defense Nigh-Level,<br />

Transuranic and Tank Wastes. The n,.d.ct of this work effort is not<br />

intended to be used in any other way. URS Corporation assumes no liability<br />

for use by others.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!