EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

. 22 3 'ZZ3 3.5.1 .71 3 .5.1.21 July 29, 1986 Page at Hanford for the period of 1945-19 70 is 28 em/ye. Sec- Lion 4.19 states that recharge rates are uncertain, with some au thors estimating up to 5 cm/yr. in unvegetated areas. Given those discrepancies in the assessment of current conditions, the document does not appear to adequately address possible climates over the lifespan of the project. Item E. The functional ability of the barrier system will depend upon the suitability of the site soils.. The document does not discuss th e nature, depth, or availability of site soils. There is no mention of impacts to the site due to excavation of soils, the ability of the soils to maintain d vegetative cover over 10,000 years, or likelihood of erosion under a drier for wetter) climate. All of these factors will affect the efficiency of the barrier. Item I. The protective barrier is assumed to be capable of 3 .5.1.57 providing the reavisfte protection without substantial technical evidence of its suitability. Criteria for this ..sump- , tion an d analysis of demonstration projects should be provided. A Item J. Resettlement of the region resulting in fatal doses 14 __ to the elation "would not be realisti c" under tb=ndi^ fez to notion alternative teinar discussed on page 3.64. No basis fox this assumption or analysis of potential for impacts is provided. 3.3.5.4 4 . 1, 15 3.5.1 .86 UV Item K. Me discussion is provided of potential future developments in disposal technology, especially in the areas of treatment and reprocessing. This could significantly affect impacts, particularly under the "no action" alternative and th e in place stabilization alte rn ative. Item L. The 1990 population for the "Hanford environs" is projected at 420,000. Section 3.4.1.1. This figure reflect. a population wi thin 80 km of th e 200 areas. Section 4.8.2. No rationale is provided for the determination of th is affected area. It would san. to be more realistic to provide data for the likely affected population, which would conceivably result in a proportionately larger degree of impact. Item M. The failure scenario postulated in section 5.20-5.21 suggests that a 10 percent loss of soil cover would result in exposure of to percent of the underlying waste. In reality, a larger volume of waste could be affected due to leaching of wastes and moisture. _ July 29, 1986 AN- 8 1585 Page 8 GI l ._ Item N. The 50 percent functional barrier failure posed in section 4.21 is projected to result in 0.1 ca/yr. in£iltration, while also stating the barrier will preclude infiltration of the burial grounds. The twostatements seem contradictory. 0.I cm infiltration based on the projected 5 ca recharge potential use wetter conditions does not seem Proportionate for a 50 percent failure scenario. (1 3 . 5 . 1 . 9.1 Item 0. Section 3.3.4.1 mentipan the potential for release of radioactive pa rt . iculate matter as a result of the collapse of tank dames. 3.1.4 What effect might such an occurrence have 36 with respect to settlement and failureof the protective barrier? Item P. Section 3.4.1.2 does not include tr an spo rt ationassociated accidents as a potential source of radiological incidents. 3.4.2.2 Item 9. Estimates of cancer deaths provided on page 5.5 do not state the population for which this number is estimated. 4. 1.15 CBR:ac A-10 A-11
El -V ZPY i'9,T'£ S3lamas PuoFaev of aaga a sad meaaaea n yvW.TC,.3aa ppni p aT S¢e ;o sai]ajiaiaeaags i¢ a8aeyan[a ia O..q. yi 8uipza aBPalrouy d v,L..,a 1ssFp 3 aqi zau a Viayw avFBameip PT—.d n¢ad P noVe 30aSa 'LFaaap ¢T paq[veal ag pinv9s sauavlpsa.. v .va4 s 5¢F Tapv ovd'sTes m puv 'spxnb[T an[emiw 'spvnvtivva a S- ea aaaz5zuf jnPnda 40 a ' PaiF eaap aq ptn°4s sy¢aa a8e:ols spza ^1 uF45F n navev[malu¢a [aa['na4a pa,dsna 1.. —1 11. ;° aovasaatl a q F, 'oi 'pai°u aq ptn°ys a s.,,a a axpvs Pavgntd ¢ )vaazv SUy 'TTSa a P ¢ F Pa avamvaoP pee pa ,Fees. . aq Pin°ya e a-Tâ¢oa 3° u°PeaBry Pae 9 ym, .. a4a aaa.3a v 5¢a8e aeaylim; Lejanaz°d ayS 'paseassv aq p,--,a a asgn gory 1— aVll s^PZO;va1 aTVal.. s 4 va8a'vn-I W ;° 3aedm Lepuaiad pve.. .seed aqL '6 azie a a TanpFnFp¢F Pn syues eF •%a ;d aV, z ..ṗl. o4s g1iieue as an3 Pae 3 .a.aAz ad asatl a4FVeaP va se a s pasSnazs a y Plna I3 avy '8 '6a08aiea ,S 3o a8yvaaaad Lieaarw a43-pus s a pOZ Pao;uvq aye ;° apFSano paiazava8 saris. Tae, SueagVavaPi pTnv4 g 3W 50 'L '(AaTPFLe° SaaYaT,ns BvUina a Puv. e[sXtau a 8u[Tdvas 3o adna a45 v°Pn°n e y,Fa 8a°Le) s nSPS°oa tealmaya 'uFBpo 'aBaeVasi p s;o ' n avb _aaa ®:Lon sa 4ana.a a,T a P n i mF PS^°4 s gu lf s [I a iVS ' sy vei v pa,mz s a l S 2P R az, z°/PUa IF- /,— nai ygi4 ua Sap PFnbxL i en PF n [P ¢S IT- a;vavoaadF P (an /P z aaF) ¢aPar3teaP a4, 0 uF l a ii me spvm v aP, oad n o Pino,. 4s 3W 3pG51 -'9 -syuea Lesoda;p(a3ezv1s —A—Dun pao;veq .i 0G50- u [y, F. P a e vds iP uaaq ane4 ,—m (G9G) 9n;co F ae t= °aap o v eu;uasuoaap a," pt°;u.n zay,a4. •( e. aeP p,noya 30a5a 'S '086L '6I za9ma°°p aau18 1 —Tad syu-J oaoiaap -MT1 Paaod -.FP vaaq a°e4s ae8m anPOad-Sq n i°/pve ani v eoFPea aou ao ia4laY^ a,ea[PV[ oa s Pas a ieyahn, aq . Pi°P 4g 413 aU saaevn ia°Paad_dq sa 30Ggp a4l 64 p..T3ap SPUaam aeo4a ft pa, ^¢F a Snag ;TI a Ia TF a pva aw Pinaz II; agl inoy8roa4a 4ae m s ia;ai .. ... u... S, , a9 pin., aa N a va;a0 pve a seN F¢q a• algeN Lanr{ yfC,'v waaq ad,....FJe[ai aU Za®azJS Ta—I y8T9 s alga. ivel LLa aW L(aop -etosl auaemzad VuTaFnbaa 40aT1vI3uu3u0u v ) DAMPOTPa1.. 6Lg8Ty aalseN lanaq y4F& t;a aiy. ..'papa.¢ aF 'aa.a. ..... pua •else. 1-1 ' Jsen L ana 1 9811 -.aa daa aqa 3a vvPeaBTaaTa Iall..,gn, 'Z vamaapH laedmT Ta3vamvoaT°vi e ^30G50 anoVBnpay3 voPTnaz 1o(sm a se Pa3aa— - m¢F aq vay pi PI-1. naF^6aa a ay L - aaFnbai vama l.enrn aa8aap peeve..;aim aV,-o as (qne ae v pasjusmaa bq p(no4s aJFS ,pao;uap aqJ v°. Npaeod, pua deuj l'Palms i(9-9 oTzuaS -aa8 y, seN Pa— ImddsuF xzd T1q 30 e F (9'9 .. .. a, • L T o d Ss la 3 0) a -I s WJ v. J a 1a;ai 3. 19 a^30 dg g aasep Vvy e pva aiasznaveaL 'anaq T 4811 a va;ay. piv;wL ;° V]Iasodsx p a°; 8divva a a300 50 °ln T Paz°ve3 a9 PT ô 4 s (;tlN EOE-ELI ' .1,T. viF. PalFaaaP g.) aaz8wd auama8vuvm a sn°1a8vep e, aql ;o save aaFnbaa aqy 'L 'sluau3meau anTaaeaTPea Paaaiao ;a ss 11-2aa (11.1 laE-ELL ' 09) quama.Tnbai J ma8eaem a s ze8vep a4l 3 aaaSgvs . Lea mays mo P asaa 4 . 30.51 IT- ley, a IL + o pasaq a i -BVTaaTIo; aya • Siauanbaauoj avp. sTVJ ;a z P-MI-P a 1a 11v se4 Pe°Laio a dp 'laamaaea5 3aetlml Lea oaFdv; a;eap Jaa [qne aya BvTaa a811ad jlaIan aae,a aya a3.T pazaaadam.F'aq pxn°ys ga TR . a]vammoao 9-T-11o; a1f alovsassald seN gveg pve •..ueansueiq • Iana3 yBFp asua,av pao ua, 8v[ aa.. SL30 "0', ^ ^(^ Y/SaLaeaS aas" moi3 TT'T'T'£ T '9'T'£ CD 00 mf (uuF,e aad". l s .;OGg O 'ad) lanPaad paq a e 4aF4n Pue anivevtPea a a sivea pao;vaH aaa (qâ aua as paln°z SLSU aad n n LLa aayiayn avow dlieaP Piôya avama svag a. .dml a Taa am¢oz[°u; ¢ ayy '9 t//` leonvad ¢Pa :ay TT'T'T'£ aSVmsveia a a eaP oeta a (amga Z iva®oa aas) s 'yue 'Lanai RSTq 4a i yn z 63TaeP PL n¢ 4 s 30G50 êll..)-a;uez 11,11ap P', n. E. I du,., Oa s JF --sou q a y. P-1 ISTI ;v vopTUF;a p s,S8vaa3 3v rvamaaeda0 apy '( ,.ft, 996T 'SZ SLnE na.aia aaa ^Lp 996T.'sz 6LnF.. NOa HY--N31 uro9nsr ix¢x .. 1[,ercxun .°:xaânf nw.•p i rna yes •ne A0010J3 30 1N3W18Vd3O w(auwsys` so uns M1210, _< 45 3 - 3a ! fi
Page 1 and 2: AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3 and 4: I 217 Kee '4' 3 Jolen fV p 2 . 2 .1
Page 5 and 6: 3 i" F 'M 5Y 5 Jolene ân.oeld Pan.
Page 7 and 8: j 5 ag WA6C0-6HERMAN PUBLIC HEALTH
Page 9 and 10: 4} 0^ ^ "I f% .J DEFENSE vs. COMMER
Page 11 and 12: £ • 9' Z • £ 1.-p, I.nTH p?uw
Page 13 and 14: ~^{ 8 „* me 221 S tZc.^...at By 1
Page 15 and 16: nab IB>1oVaa1 s,+ooen..O c 3 %1ON3d
Page 17 and 18: F' "q ` 3' 22 3 The state of Washin
Page 19 and 20: -p. .IV as avpnap m 3,,S, V+!^+ IT.
Page 21 and 22: -ZI- {. T ' T ' V ' OT'T'b'Z J-V e
Page 23 and 24: ILsÔ 3 .3.1. 1 B 1966 62: 5 In the
Page 25 and 26: € 223 223 .^nry Wr^v (^.. c^!3 a
Page 27 and 28: 223 f` n A V fT duly 29, 1986 Paget
Page 29: ZQM 223 July 29, 1986 Page 5 'July2
Page 33 and 34: hn of 223 223 o-,mw ttîlt' . ' STA
Page 35 and 36: f d ^ z3 X23 11 zt^ is iti.,A.13 AU
Page 37 and 38: . 223 oo M 3.5.4.6 3.5.1.8 -amP, wo
Page 39 and 40: X23 223 A9u 8 ty86 02 ..'tl,: 8 I5'
Page 41 and 42: 223 a O 3.5.1.11 3.5.1.13 3.5..1.36
Page 43 and 44: F 0 P 6 f 3 'u?3 d O AZ 3 Revise of
Page 45 and 46: 223 223 Review of Haefocd 0efense W
Page 47 and 48: Revie o£ HanfoM Defen,ê waats Its
Page 50 and 51: lD
Page 52 and 53: t 5 4 0 9 â tiô L AU, 8 1966 Ali-
Page 54 and 55: ;ex a^ 220.3 PAIM isl O w 2.5.5 3 .
Page 56 and 57: 1 _ e ' ^1 0 9 La Z2A_3 Nw 3.1.6.1
Page 58 and 59: Eq k 3 °. 11y x,s,—p, 1 rEaa^.se
Page 60 and 61: 2 23 223
Page 62 and 63: ,F 3 a w # €^ f 223 August 1, 198
Page 64 and 65: 6 7 /III23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Techni
Page 66 and 67: LJ it-fâ r 223 For USDOE, we have
Page 68 and 69: k 223 223 CHAPTER 2 VOLUME I REVIEW
Page 70 and 71: w7.,rg r. 223 Qsssign; None. Gn I.0
Page 72 and 73: VJ 223 223 1011. What alternatives
Page 74 and 75: ,Cw^V 2293 5.3 IN-PLACE STABILIZATI
Page 76 and 77: 3- 223 223 strontium fluoride. The
Page 78 and 79: . 3 B-B in vi ea of the potential p
Page 80 and 81:
1 a 0 Olk 223 22.3 (P N W W N 4- i>
Page 82 and 83:
aft y 0 t 3 'Af Awa2^3 223 conditio
Page 84 and 85:
z 0223 223 3.5.1.72 a) Can the data
Page 86 and 87:
_y - 2 f F 7 All 223 223 W (Jl 3.5.
Page 88 and 89:
z 223 223 The assumptions of 0.5 an
Page 90 and 91:
# 4 a 22.1 223 P-6 Why was it assum
Page 92 and 93:
1 6,23 223 (T1 A 1- 3.5.6.25 3.5.6.
Page 94 and 95:
,^ r= 22 3 223 OoeXtions None. APPE
Page 96 and 97:
3:+nCr3 223 4.2.23 Page F.19 Refere
Page 98 and 99:
3.5.1.45 3.5.1.46 3.5.1.47 Page M.9
Page 100 and 101:
zr 9 ^ a ^,^ 3 à 61) 223 4.2.45 th
Page 102 and 103:
0 REFI,cNCE CHECKS (I) DRAFT ENVIRO
Page 104 and 105:
M 7. 223 Ref. No. Year Reference. 1
Page 106 and 107:
223 C Ref. No, Year Reference EIS P
Page 108 and 109:
n qÂ 223 Reference Reference Ref.
Page 110 and 111:
223 Raf 26.14 26.15 26.16 26.11 26.
Page 112 and 113:
a € ^+ I r, 22 d 225 Resolution N
Page 114 and 115:
1 229 TO Rich ualten/ IS L S Dept o
Page 116:
^ t 9 ;9 Fq 6 p 4^$ p9 S4 # 8 to '?
Page 119 and 120:
1 1 7 4 ' 0 1 6'_1 q 231 - In1946 a
Page 121 and 122:
.: a d . 9 231 231 2.4.2.2 v O 2.4.
Page 123 and 124:
f 3 a ""10975 In V fV EXECUTIVE SUM
Page 125 and 126:
g2 231 231 oaa, ^_ ° = 6a3, 3 .2.4
Page 127 and 128:
— t '113 i C0MMENTS ON APPENDIX M
Page 129 and 130:
p gg - J k 2 a ^ ^,? 6 k ^ 231 231
Page 131 and 132:
h - y 1 - _^ 3 .LLw S f â-
Page 133 and 134:
7 4-11 231 231 Da Me tollosawl CQMM
Page 135 and 136:
SL iL _. .. _. '98ieyaav Salem - pu
Page 137 and 138:
231 231 4.2.55 11. On page R.90, "1
Page 139 and 140:
l(,iIÎN OGl3.N Representative Dean
Page 141 and 142:
xm ._ 233 233 Flh stra[t - Isola .f
Page 143 and 144:
a 233 ^:^373 sur dais waste may be
Page 145 and 146:
a X33 M3 was to be retrievable {or
Page 147 and 148:
233 X33 09133 by DOE to meet the
Page 149 and 150:
e t t - 1- 233 23E3 4. DOE self-reg
Page 151 and 152:
233 23,3 rent releases to the Colum
Page 153 and 154:
233 233 TCt IJ. P. 1.15. The nuclea
Page 155 and 156:
233 233 .__ : , sa â33 6, 33 Manag
Page 157 and 158:
i 1 3^'3 4 234 REVIEW OF DRAFT ENY3
Page 159 and 160:
s l i . - - - RAECUSIVE SUM9IARY -
Page 161 and 162:
i w 3 € ^4 e ',st ^. 23< 23= COMM
Page 163 and 164:
1 0 1` 1°3 234 23^ COMMENTS ON APP
Page 165 and 166:
234 234 3.3.5.9 3.3.5.9 4. On page
Page 167 and 168:
4 23< _ p33¢ 3.2.6.5 15. No mentio
Page 169 and 170:
p y y9 }{45 'FF i E x ?:Y 234 23 t
Page 171 and 172:
3 = ! Ol N O COMMENTS ON APPENDIX R
Page 173 and 174:
2341 23 N N 3.5.6.41 COMMPMTS ON AP
Page 175 and 176:
3° N £ski hd' 236 .^. ^ G C t 1,
Page 177 and 178:
" ^3 3 239 109!/96 19:15 NAC 11LETE
Page 179 and 180:
' 2 9^ +ir. ^ q k of ^^ 1e.137,e6 1
Page 181 and 182:
a 5 a ( aY 12139 239 61 W 0 SBr9Yn3
Page 183 and 184:
' 239 e^ Î(1^ pt 10/02.% I(im NK-W
Page 185 and 186:
10,07lew 10:31 NRC-41LLSiE w.0O4 BO
Page 187 and 188:
E{r ti (v.a at,, .,,^ ; Sect 3. The
Page 189 and 190:
If I $ ? 1 240 HE Aa_r wl NON BE 8.
Page 191 and 192:
240 240 2.4.1.4 2.4.1.6 RECEIVED DO
Page 193 and 194:
IT N 240 240 RECE,,VED DOE-RL - -E-
Page 195 and 196:
9 -i 0L., , -1 240 2.4.1.9 1T A A 3
Page 197 and 198:
S'Z'b'£ ^ â IMend'3oa 'UZI 9e61 g
Page 199 and 200:
°7 a) 24 A. .h 3 6H 3.1.4.9 I.A NO
Page 201 and 202:
N01
Page 203 and 204:
NOISIAM WM 7C0 99&-9 L d3S 121-304
Page 205 and 206:
24021 246 -13- -I a- Cn Ul o gouTin
Page 207 and 208:
NOISIAIO WM Kg gm 9t d3S NOISINOWM
Page 209 and 210:
No1slAlawM =^"^ 98^ 9 L d35 OUT a s
Page 211 and 212:
2 ^ n 1. Y ^`^ a $ aa% wd A 5 -26-
Page 213 and 214:
2`$2 ME —a— T1BLE 1 V Each Isol
Page 215 and 216:
NOISING WM ZbL^ 98d 9 L d3S Vn4 W}
Page 217 and 218:
aN wu = ra . W .aa^. I mm[ad ye lx.
Page 219 and 220:
. 1 1 1 :> I2^^^1'+./ N4 N RECEIVED
Page 221 and 222:
s 1 4 1 1 242 240 WTE nn AAFA RECEI
Page 223 and 224:
F ai 1 1 6 xs 2 i 0 7.«d 242 24A\/
Page 225 and 226:
2 2 242, c- V a RECEIVED DOE.RL - R
Page 227 and 228:
1 1741'')1079 2 i I ,v 0) V R) 4„
Page 229 and 230:
A 4 s . 11 tea. Pea` N Fes° RECEIV
Page 231 and 232:
s aTg 1, e-p Gs n Rr !Z i. ab N"yM
Page 233 and 234:
ka - 4 e j^` 2, 1. 2 0L." ENROSl.6:
Page 235 and 236:
.+nua .1 w mP it u_ IB-OZ-601 , 1 a
Page 237 and 238:
Z ,,j _ €v Z g f2" 02 RECEIVED DO
Page 239 and 240:
$. •.nl as a..IP ua'y i 1ww.we wJ
Page 241 and 242:
N'$ J 2413 2.4.1.1 2.2.1 2.3.2.3 M
Page 243 and 244:
RM 2.3.2.3 RECEIVED DOE-RL or, 18gN
Page 245 and 246:
! 1 1 0 2,13 243 1 4. 4. 8. P. 3.10
Page 247 and 248:
P° 1 24 3 #"' R:r_ ti3 _ 3.5.5.2 3
Page 249 and 250:
2 43 ON Ql t0 RECEIVED DOE-RL 1 4 n
show all

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?