EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

k
223 223
CHAPTER 2
VOLUME I REVIEW
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
INTRODUCTION
CTl
N
V
APPENDIX Q APPLICATION OF GEOHYDROLOGIC MODELS TO POSTULATED 3-30
RELEASE SCENARIOS FOR THE HANFORD SITE
General Comments
Errors or Uncertainties
Questions
APPENDIX R ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF WASTE DISPOSAL 3-33
SYSTEMS
General Comments
Errors or Uncertainties
Questions
APPENDIX S PROBABILITY AND CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF RADIONUCLIDE 3-35
RELEASE AND TRANSPORT AFTER DISPOSAL
General Comments
Errors or Uncertainties
Questions
APPENDIX U PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURE. GROUNDWATER 3-37
TRANSPORT OF CHEMICALS RELEASED
General Comments
Errors or Uncertainties
puesti ohs
-
APPENDIX V SITE-MONITORING EXPERIENCE 3-38
General Comments
Errors or Uncertainties
Questions
CHAPTER 4 REFERENCE CHECK DISCUSSION (from Appendix A) 4-1
LIST OF REVIEWERS 4-13
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A REFERENCE CHECK TABLE
This chapter discusses selected sections from Volume I (main text) of
the DOE DEIS. for each section or subsection discussed, the following
format is followed:
-
General Comments - This part of the discussion summarizes briefly what
is presented in the DEIS so that the reader might receive the comments in
proper context. The discussion also includes a qualitative
characterization, where appropriate- based upon the opinion of the author,
as to the overall content of the section in question. General tone,
thoroughness and appropriateness of the section are mentioned.
Errors or Uncertainties - Based u p on the review of references cited in
the document, and ononclusions in the text, any concerns dealing with the
substantive content of She section are discussed here. Concerns may range
from typographical errors to major disagreement in concept. In many cases
no errors or uncertainties are noted.
Question - Based vPon the discussion above, a list of questions is
offered to focus any concerns which have arisen and to clarify to DOE the
exact type of response requested. Questions are only asked to substantive
issues. Types and non-critical disa greements are left in the errors or
uncertainties discussion. All questions are numbered and formed in away to
encourage clarity of purpose and of response. This shouldfacilitate future
discussion or reference to these questions, especially in the FEIS.
1.0 GENERAL SUMMARY
General Cement
This chapter of the EIS presents an overview of the entire project,
includin g alternatives considered. The 24 pane summary has been bound
separately and is used in place of the EIS for-uperal circulation to the
public. As a result, many more people have received the summary
(3,000-5,000) than have received the main CIS (1,000-2,ODO),
0
O
n
0TD
s
t-F
C1
N
a
ID
CL
Discussion of p otential impacts to a repository are limited to a
reference to cost sharing on a `pro rata' basis, although it is not
mentioned whether this is based on weight, volume or radioactivity.
Shipping analyses assumed a repository 3,000 miles away as a worst case.
Four disposal alternatives, including no-action are summarized. The
barrier is described and compared. to the Silla Dynasty tombs in Korea,..
although no reference is cited for this important conclusion. Table 3 lists
major health and safety impacts, although these impacts are not defined.
2-1