EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

¢ {k 6 0 Adi 2 24N -19- -30- 3.1.8.9 For instance, a ¢ F ill of --ml Cbounded gallons n£ highly —di ... I've This may explain why the WE is so reluctant to remove the `single- sludge each slurry the all well floor of a vitrification plant could Mve ebe11` tank waatee at ...lend. But this ch..Fe not he cons leered an envi[on- a mgni£icant impact be ¢ubaequent operation and—let enanre of the plant. pally acceptable rationale for their permanent in-place disposal. One impact of this and other. spills 18 to make the processing areas very QA V radioactive. This would make entry into the process aremuch more dangerous. sequentially, all maintenance, repair and replacement requiring entry by personnel would involve higher exposures and work under more hazardous conditions. This could seriously impair the maintainability and bent. she operability of the plant. There is another class of events that could seriously affect operation of a vitrification plant that EOE/E15 -0013 has not taken into account. This relates to the Ability to produce consistently the kind of feed solution. and slurries that will . r woad far vitrification, without ¢.. 2.mly imoairinc the integrity of the 'Tank Farm' operation. For instance, water and but chemicals will be Added to the sludge and the mixture is then agitated to produce a slurry-Feed for the glass matter. As noted, each a process has been suspected at S.p to cause failures of meveral task cooling coils o As laa.t one mcceaion. Failure of a large numbee of booting coil. in the new tanks weld seriously impair their ability to held high-level wastes. The alder tank. already have oany leaking coil¢, rendering them unfit for holding hot sludge. Most of the older task¢ also have leaks in the primary c t vock.l. which are currently plugged with salt which has crystellizad on the cracks. Thus the transfer of wn9se free older tanks to Never ones and the preparation of feedstock for the vitrification. plant could lead to serious problems, including leaks of—dicactivit, and impairment of the `Tank Fars" o{rerations Grouting In order for WE to implement its long-term defense waste management plan of presently disposing of was ¢ groiomly Oaeignamd as `high-level• in ahellow Initialpits, it Aad Co adopt a Mw, waste management standard, diet w ¢ tailored to set this particular policy decision. Thus, . promulgated W. Order 5830 which m,numdee the previous standard. 1. ..unl Ehapter 05111 at in 1973. Although this standard he. ben justified as being Named oa the 'beet .—liable bi gg er,- it he.. not been subject to independent evaluation. Nor has the underlying scientific rationale base ..jest to an span peer re i.w. Moreover. this raw. standard is certainly not based on scientific data derived free operating experience of DOE nuclear wait. programs. Nor am they established to beet. the 35 millirem/year radiation dose standard set for commercial Nuclear power plants, but rather M the 500 millirem/year limit. Without question, WE Order 5830 will allow for aig.ifi ..t increases in the radiological and ..In burden of soil. at WE site.. Grouting of nuclear and toxic wastes for .oil disposal will he A major contributor. In ibis regard, ApFendix 0 0£ the —at IS i. seriously a.fisi.st in presenting data shows volso.s, a .bone of radioactive and non-radioactive waste. vn the grout and leach rates. on page D.S, con£1i11no figures are given an to the grouted waste volumes. 3.1.8.1 RECEIVED DOE-RL SEP 16 1986 62• WM DIVISION On the average to la he bout five grout ampaign. per year, each lasting ato m1 mono. RECEIVED DDE-'° ' xhnut 1,800 m3 of waste feed -old be mixed with SEP 1 610 pulz WM DIVISION
No1slAlawM =^"^ 98^ 9 L d35 OUT a s a£ Ta8'Ta£ II asasa£ 8eI'b°d paletnmzo; aq u ozb yeVl a uepF3um {euan?ppe ap?nmd sbaivue ] e- v f ayF EUSPUe>a t2 S is a a pT0 —01 000•E ueVi a ]anaaaupafp 3uamaa • 3¢4] isi v2a ayJ ;U ya[uu aaYVm sI3 3Je+p aVa 'dtl5 3e auaP 6utay saiPnaa 6uiyaeai RzeuFwaiazdvi a ze;ai anbvn a 3v vUS3daaxa a yS y3iN N SIAIO WM "T°3aa ti`°'y pm ' e+a?a • nmaa Tamn =imfive 14 ^1OI I 90 9 L d3S a en nv. Ravi -auawaa yJ?x Pa.iw 6e?Sy'ny aFid parorai aq RS.aiaaTY a u as;aX . - t¢aoae?p aovTa-at Teaodvia ?Fbot6e^ co L31 LD aawF3 4 03 [ ax SF '(Z' OEXSiapi p .3W) spiepueya 3'ana6eum a3aen {euawUF " pa]depe"Rt 3Ua=a] eJj n0{p iFI aMt ai y3 JeV] Loj3uaw o3 {n; aaw aT 9I3 443 Vfinay3tp /Ê 'wi"o3 - aFVi ui P--M—p W LTT- b/TJU OB o1 OL aVi u " aiaaaL 3e V1 a a?JV an gl3 J3vap ey] "T ... nTd .M,T uai3Sm eyd,v ;U froze] ut 'Snoi6 aVy u , a;ewai 'RTJUaaedtle 'STFx saPi2inua FPei lay]o aVJ • aanx.UV 'Jayvee "T. PaUew eze aws¢x an aie3w ai fib ya nn ve anw-ai 0i uaMe> ai LITx mto;be 3eVJ uanUU veop g2X i;eap eV,6 'V-W-TI vu a-bunt xo3 aaniivuzRiv >uaae;;?B ayi m angetai paluas°id eir aum1U anoab ;o a6uez a (, a 'p'e 'E'0 aaTgei) '0 zi uU V vI 'S3uen>i>mcv] 3san anapaeze4 ina3aeoFBai.ucu a4> uU nap w---P- aaaVi F zop ue]i anpvui ue 6q Raw >I faua+a s i y3 +o; uo?ivuetdxa ou aT aaayi ' Ew S.1 z E'S aF a—T— a3aen pa>n0afi Tna> a4> 'uU13Uav -TV uT am I.IlTda a"3 T-e aVi cwo;iad auo ;I waya ebeuaw w a opezYLtnP 3a vWe_eJF2 ay3 pueRzy yuewuoixnua ayy uF Jsicied TTix puv (eteaR --ITIT 11 - 6LSI Pue aa¢.R 006 .056 E6zy ""'A 000'OLL 6fiai1 '— .T-;M 6vot RFTZ°u?pao atJSa aReV Reyj a eiaq vzwuoi 3o aia a PFi n pFPei aeayi 9 1-6561 w Ot a 6 'C aaeg¢ ag pt nox awP-1 aaae P -0 ano:6 6u?—T— a yy 'ameaa3a eases Paa3 soea z 10> SeBZ -V ? teaoa aVy w 6 of +u F Wo ; o zR E area ptnaw zF 'aeaR aatl ev6iedvaa anF3 dU a>vz v aY u6FVdmea zed uôE'S 3nWe 3^•avm T On. gees. P»m+b ?qoa It nPOadei a 3 3noa6v4a -it- -EL- W V 6 )ab' G.ss
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3 and 4:
I 217 Kee '4' 3 Jolen fV p 2 . 2 .1
Page 5 and 6:
3 i" F 'M 5Y 5 Jolene ân.oeld Pan.
Page 7 and 8:
j 5 ag WA6C0-6HERMAN PUBLIC HEALTH
Page 9 and 10:
4} 0^ ^ "I f% .J DEFENSE vs. COMMER
Page 11 and 12:
£ • 9' Z • £ 1.-p, I.nTH p?uw
Page 13 and 14:
~^{ 8 „* me 221 S tZc.^...at By 1
Page 15 and 16:
nab IB>1oVaa1 s,+ooen..O c 3 %1ON3d
Page 17 and 18:
F' "q ` 3' 22 3 The state of Washin
Page 19 and 20:
-p. .IV as avpnap m 3,,S, V+!^+ IT.
Page 21 and 22:
-ZI- {. T ' T ' V ' OT'T'b'Z J-V e
Page 23 and 24:
ILsÔ 3 .3.1. 1 B 1966 62: 5 In the
Page 25 and 26:
€ 223 223 .^nry Wr^v (^.. c^!3 a
Page 27 and 28:
223 f` n A V fT duly 29, 1986 Paget
Page 29 and 30:
ZQM 223 July 29, 1986 Page 5 'July2
Page 31 and 32:
El -V ZPY i'9,T'£ S3lamas PuoFaev
Page 33 and 34:
hn of 223 223 o-,mw ttîlt' . ' STA
Page 35 and 36:
f d ^ z3 X23 11 zt^ is iti.,A.13 AU
Page 37 and 38:
. 223 oo M 3.5.4.6 3.5.1.8 -amP, wo
Page 39 and 40:
X23 223 A9u 8 ty86 02 ..'tl,: 8 I5'
Page 41 and 42:
223 a O 3.5.1.11 3.5.1.13 3.5..1.36
Page 43 and 44:
F 0 P 6 f 3 'u?3 d O AZ 3 Revise of
Page 45 and 46:
223 223 Review of Haefocd 0efense W
Page 47 and 48:
Revie o£ HanfoM Defen,ê waats Its
Page 50 and 51:
lD
Page 52 and 53:
t 5 4 0 9 â tiô L AU, 8 1966 Ali-
Page 54 and 55:
;ex a^ 220.3 PAIM isl O w 2.5.5 3 .
Page 56 and 57:
1 _ e ' ^1 0 9 La Z2A_3 Nw 3.1.6.1
Page 58 and 59:
Eq k 3 °. 11y x,s,—p, 1 rEaa^.se
Page 60 and 61:
2 23 223
Page 62 and 63:
,F 3 a w # €^ f 223 August 1, 198
Page 64 and 65:
6 7 /III23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Techni
Page 66 and 67:
LJ it-fâ r 223 For USDOE, we have
Page 68 and 69:
k 223 223 CHAPTER 2 VOLUME I REVIEW
Page 70 and 71:
w7.,rg r. 223 Qsssign; None. Gn I.0
Page 72 and 73:
VJ 223 223 1011. What alternatives
Page 74 and 75:
,Cw^V 2293 5.3 IN-PLACE STABILIZATI
Page 76 and 77:
3- 223 223 strontium fluoride. The
Page 78 and 79:
. 3 B-B in vi ea of the potential p
Page 80 and 81:
1 a 0 Olk 223 22.3 (P N W W N 4- i>
Page 82 and 83:
aft y 0 t 3 'Af Awa2^3 223 conditio
Page 84 and 85:
z 0223 223 3.5.1.72 a) Can the data
Page 86 and 87:
_y - 2 f F 7 All 223 223 W (Jl 3.5.
Page 88 and 89:
z 223 223 The assumptions of 0.5 an
Page 90 and 91:
# 4 a 22.1 223 P-6 Why was it assum
Page 92 and 93:
1 6,23 223 (T1 A 1- 3.5.6.25 3.5.6.
Page 94 and 95:
,^ r= 22 3 223 OoeXtions None. APPE
Page 96 and 97:
3:+nCr3 223 4.2.23 Page F.19 Refere
Page 98 and 99:
3.5.1.45 3.5.1.46 3.5.1.47 Page M.9
Page 100 and 101:
zr 9 ^ a ^,^ 3 à 61) 223 4.2.45 th
Page 102 and 103:
0 REFI,cNCE CHECKS (I) DRAFT ENVIRO
Page 104 and 105:
M 7. 223 Ref. No. Year Reference. 1
Page 106 and 107:
223 C Ref. No, Year Reference EIS P
Page 108 and 109:
n qÂ 223 Reference Reference Ref.
Page 110 and 111:
223 Raf 26.14 26.15 26.16 26.11 26.
Page 112 and 113:
a € ^+ I r, 22 d 225 Resolution N
Page 114 and 115:
1 229 TO Rich ualten/ IS L S Dept o
Page 116:
^ t 9 ;9 Fq 6 p 4^$ p9 S4 # 8 to '?
Page 119 and 120:
1 1 7 4 ' 0 1 6'_1 q 231 - In1946 a
Page 121 and 122:
.: a d . 9 231 231 2.4.2.2 v O 2.4.
Page 123 and 124:
f 3 a ""10975 In V fV EXECUTIVE SUM
Page 125 and 126:
g2 231 231 oaa, ^_ ° = 6a3, 3 .2.4
Page 127 and 128:
— t '113 i C0MMENTS ON APPENDIX M
Page 129 and 130:
p gg - J k 2 a ^ ^,? 6 k ^ 231 231
Page 131 and 132:
h - y 1 - _^ 3 .LLw S f â-
Page 133 and 134:
7 4-11 231 231 Da Me tollosawl CQMM
Page 135 and 136:
SL iL _. .. _. '98ieyaav Salem - pu
Page 137 and 138:
231 231 4.2.55 11. On page R.90, "1
Page 139 and 140:
l(,iIÎN OGl3.N Representative Dean
Page 141 and 142:
xm ._ 233 233 Flh stra[t - Isola .f
Page 143 and 144:
a 233 ^:^373 sur dais waste may be
Page 145 and 146:
a X33 M3 was to be retrievable {or
Page 147 and 148:
233 X33 09133 by DOE to meet the
Page 149 and 150:
e t t - 1- 233 23E3 4. DOE self-reg
Page 151 and 152:
233 23,3 rent releases to the Colum
Page 153 and 154:
233 233 TCt IJ. P. 1.15. The nuclea
Page 155 and 156:
233 233 .__ : , sa â33 6, 33 Manag
Page 157 and 158: i 1 3^'3 4 234 REVIEW OF DRAFT ENY3
Page 159 and 160: s l i . - - - RAECUSIVE SUM9IARY -
Page 161 and 162: i w 3 € ^4 e ',st ^. 23< 23= COMM
Page 163 and 164: 1 0 1` 1°3 234 23^ COMMENTS ON APP
Page 165 and 166: 234 234 3.3.5.9 3.3.5.9 4. On page
Page 167 and 168: 4 23< _ p33¢ 3.2.6.5 15. No mentio
Page 169 and 170: p y y9 }{45 'FF i E x ?:Y 234 23 t
Page 171 and 172: 3 = ! Ol N O COMMENTS ON APPENDIX R
Page 173 and 174: 2341 23 N N 3.5.6.41 COMMPMTS ON AP
Page 175 and 176: 3° N £ski hd' 236 .^. ^ G C t 1,
Page 177 and 178: " ^3 3 239 109!/96 19:15 NAC 11LETE
Page 179 and 180: ' 2 9^ +ir. ^ q k of ^^ 1e.137,e6 1
Page 181 and 182: a 5 a ( aY 12139 239 61 W 0 SBr9Yn3
Page 183 and 184: ' 239 e^ Î(1^ pt 10/02.% I(im NK-W
Page 185 and 186: 10,07lew 10:31 NRC-41LLSiE w.0O4 BO
Page 187 and 188: E{r ti (v.a at,, .,,^ ; Sect 3. The
Page 189 and 190: If I $ ? 1 240 HE Aa_r wl NON BE 8.
Page 191 and 192: 240 240 2.4.1.4 2.4.1.6 RECEIVED DO
Page 193 and 194: IT N 240 240 RECE,,VED DOE-RL - -E-
Page 195 and 196: 9 -i 0L., , -1 240 2.4.1.9 1T A A 3
Page 197 and 198: S'Z'b'£ ^ â IMend'3oa 'UZI 9e61 g
Page 199 and 200: °7 a) 24 A. .h 3 6H 3.1.4.9 I.A NO
Page 201 and 202: N01
Page 203 and 204: NOISIAM WM 7C0 99&-9 L d3S 121-304
Page 205 and 206: 24021 246 -13- -I a- Cn Ul o gouTin
Page 207: NOISIAIO WM Kg gm 9t d3S NOISINOWM
Page 211 and 212: 2 ^ n 1. Y ^`^ a $ aa% wd A 5 -26-
Page 213 and 214: 2`$2 ME —a— T1BLE 1 V Each Isol
Page 215 and 216: NOISING WM ZbL^ 98d 9 L d3S Vn4 W}
Page 217 and 218: aN wu = ra . W .aa^. I mm[ad ye lx.
Page 219 and 220: . 1 1 1 :> I2^^^1'+./ N4 N RECEIVED
Page 221 and 222: s 1 4 1 1 242 240 WTE nn AAFA RECEI
Page 223 and 224: F ai 1 1 6 xs 2 i 0 7.«d 242 24A\/
Page 225 and 226: 2 2 242, c- V a RECEIVED DOE.RL - R
Page 227 and 228: 1 1741'')1079 2 i I ,v 0) V R) 4„
Page 229 and 230: A 4 s . 11 tea. Pea` N Fes° RECEIV
Page 231 and 232: s aTg 1, e-p Gs n Rr !Z i. ab N"yM
Page 233 and 234: ka - 4 e j^` 2, 1. 2 0L." ENROSl.6:
Page 235 and 236: .+nua .1 w mP it u_ IB-OZ-601 , 1 a
Page 237 and 238: Z ,,j _ €v Z g f2" 02 RECEIVED DO
Page 239 and 240: $. •.nl as a..IP ua'y i 1ww.we wJ
Page 241 and 242: N'$ J 2413 2.4.1.1 2.2.1 2.3.2.3 M
Page 243 and 244: RM 2.3.2.3 RECEIVED DOE-RL or, 18gN
Page 245 and 246: ! 1 1 0 2,13 243 1 4. 4. 8. P. 3.10
Page 247 and 248: P° 1 24 3 #"' R:r_ ti3 _ 3.5.5.2 3
Page 249 and 250: 2 43 ON Ql t0 RECEIVED DOE-RL 1 4 n
show all

EIS-0113_Section_11 - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?