Chapter Four - HAP International
Chapter Four - HAP International
Chapter Four - HAP International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE 2008 HUMANITARIAN ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT<br />
8. DanChurchAid (DCA)<br />
5. Complaints and Response Mechanisms (Principle 6)<br />
• Pilot studies in Malawi and Angola<br />
• An internet based complaint system for all<br />
DCA stakeholders developed<br />
• Baseline study in Malawi completed with intensive<br />
involvement of local communities. Study followed<br />
by community sensitisation meetings and<br />
consultations with all stakeholders.<br />
• The draft Angola Complaint system is still not<br />
completed. The goal is to develop a generic system<br />
for all Humanitarian Mine Action Programmes.<br />
• Cambodia will develop a complaint mechanism with<br />
Lutheran World Federation (input from CARE<br />
<strong>International</strong>.)<br />
• DCA partner in Bangladesh had to revise their<br />
complaint system when the system was swamped<br />
with irrelevant complaints about marriage<br />
proposals, etc.<br />
• Lengthy process in DCA HQ, Board and Regional<br />
Offices prior to launch of web-based complaint<br />
system. System has been approved in late<br />
February 2009 and will be launched in March 2009.<br />
Lessons learned: the consultations process about<br />
Complaints Handling Systems takes much longer<br />
time than anticipated. All stakeholders have relevant<br />
input that needs considering before the launch of the<br />
complaint handling system.<br />
6. Continuous Improvement (Principles 5 & 7)<br />
• Targeted training for DCA humanitarian<br />
response staff as per findings from <strong>HAP</strong><br />
audits.<br />
• Systematic lessons learned exchange through<br />
Humanitarian Response unit meetings,<br />
Programme Forum, Partner platform meetings<br />
and ACT.<br />
• The <strong>HAP</strong> “To complain or not to complain” study<br />
was discussed to 1) prioritise attention of the issue<br />
of sexual abuse and exploitation in humanitarian<br />
response; and 2) to understand the impact of a<br />
complaints mechanism<br />
• DCA Tsunami evaluation on significant changes in<br />
local communities undertaken.<br />
84<br />
• Findings from complaint pilot studies in<br />
Malawi and Angola analysed and lessons<br />
learned passed on.<br />
• Pilot projects in Ethiopia and Cambodia will<br />
be formed based on Malawi/Angola findings.<br />
• Launch web-based complaint system with a<br />
2009 pilot phase.<br />
• DCA programme/ partner/ACT platforms are<br />
the venue for exchange of lessons learned.<br />
• Highlight learning from DCA Malawi and DCA<br />
Angola complaints<br />
• Major findings from Zimbabwe food<br />
assistance evaluation will be debated.<br />
109