06.01.2014 Views

Chapter Four - HAP International

Chapter Four - HAP International

Chapter Four - HAP International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 2008 Humanitarian Accountability Report<br />

21. World Vision <strong>International</strong><br />

a. Continue to share with <strong>HAP</strong> all WVI reports,<br />

plans and brochures on humanitarian<br />

accountability<br />

b. Develop a better tracking system to measure<br />

and record field progress on accountability<br />

The development of a field accountability scorecard<br />

was postponed in 2008, because it was decided that a<br />

combined quality assurance scorecard would be easier<br />

to implement and more effective in the longer term.<br />

b. Improve tracking and monitoring of quality<br />

assurance to better measure field progress<br />

on accountability issues<br />

4. Addressing Complaints (Principle 6)<br />

We work toward a system to include in contracts<br />

for international and national staff specific ways<br />

to hear concerns, negotiate disagreements and<br />

to address complaints<br />

Communications plan developed to disseminate<br />

whistleblower policy<br />

H-Account mapped different complaints mechanisms<br />

within the organisation to pave the way for greater<br />

coherency, inter-operability and ease of<br />

implementation at field level. This mapping included<br />

community complaints mechanisms at field level, staff<br />

grievance policy, child protection and corporate<br />

whistleblower policies.<br />

Global Accountability Team to finalise<br />

mapping of WV’s complaints functions and<br />

facilitate a process to bring greater coherence<br />

to internal accountability infrastructure.<br />

To make beneficiaries aware that WV has an<br />

open door policy with respect to concerns from<br />

their perspective<br />

a. Community complaints software made<br />

available for dissemination to other country<br />

contexts.<br />

b. FPMG’s help desk methodology strengthened<br />

and materials developed to enable take up in<br />

other countries.<br />

Community complaints software continued to operate<br />

in Sri Lanka and was modified and tested in Zimbabwe<br />

and Sierra Leone. A generic version of the software<br />

should be available in 2009.<br />

Complaints mechanisms at field level were established<br />

and strengthened in emergency and non-emergency<br />

settings in an increasing number of field programmes.<br />

Investigations into complaints received took place both<br />

through field complaints mechanisms as well as the<br />

whistleblower policy.<br />

FPMG piloted complaints mechanisms in Kenya, South<br />

Sudan, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. This experience<br />

has been gathered together by a consultant to develop<br />

a generic community complaints tool kit to disseminate<br />

to all food aid projects by the end of 2010.<br />

a. Finalise generic software application by<br />

end of 2009.<br />

b. All FPMG food distribution projects are<br />

using a common community complaints<br />

mechanism by 2010.<br />

c. Complaints mechanisms continue to be<br />

established in emergency and nonemergency<br />

settings.<br />

d. Develop and launch a CRM resource guide<br />

in FPMG<br />

e. Write / Publish a briefing paper to share<br />

key processes and lessons from the<br />

piloting of CRM in FPMG<br />

Case Study Example: Good practice in humanitarian accountability and quality management – Summary version<br />

FPMG has had a help desk community feedback mechanism for some time, but it only recently began to be truly accountable to beneficiaries and their<br />

communities. A help desk is a group of five or community members that set up an information point beside food distributions in the field. They are trained<br />

to handle common community queries and to provide information to any community member that requests it. More complicated or contentious queries are<br />

handed up to World Vision staff who then follow up either on the spot or with an investigation as appropriate. In order to make this approach work<br />

125<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!