Chapter Four - HAP International
Chapter Four - HAP International
Chapter Four - HAP International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The 2008 Humanitarian Accountability Report<br />
21. World Vision <strong>International</strong><br />
a. Continue to share with <strong>HAP</strong> all WVI reports,<br />
plans and brochures on humanitarian<br />
accountability<br />
b. Develop a better tracking system to measure<br />
and record field progress on accountability<br />
The development of a field accountability scorecard<br />
was postponed in 2008, because it was decided that a<br />
combined quality assurance scorecard would be easier<br />
to implement and more effective in the longer term.<br />
b. Improve tracking and monitoring of quality<br />
assurance to better measure field progress<br />
on accountability issues<br />
4. Addressing Complaints (Principle 6)<br />
We work toward a system to include in contracts<br />
for international and national staff specific ways<br />
to hear concerns, negotiate disagreements and<br />
to address complaints<br />
Communications plan developed to disseminate<br />
whistleblower policy<br />
H-Account mapped different complaints mechanisms<br />
within the organisation to pave the way for greater<br />
coherency, inter-operability and ease of<br />
implementation at field level. This mapping included<br />
community complaints mechanisms at field level, staff<br />
grievance policy, child protection and corporate<br />
whistleblower policies.<br />
Global Accountability Team to finalise<br />
mapping of WV’s complaints functions and<br />
facilitate a process to bring greater coherence<br />
to internal accountability infrastructure.<br />
To make beneficiaries aware that WV has an<br />
open door policy with respect to concerns from<br />
their perspective<br />
a. Community complaints software made<br />
available for dissemination to other country<br />
contexts.<br />
b. FPMG’s help desk methodology strengthened<br />
and materials developed to enable take up in<br />
other countries.<br />
Community complaints software continued to operate<br />
in Sri Lanka and was modified and tested in Zimbabwe<br />
and Sierra Leone. A generic version of the software<br />
should be available in 2009.<br />
Complaints mechanisms at field level were established<br />
and strengthened in emergency and non-emergency<br />
settings in an increasing number of field programmes.<br />
Investigations into complaints received took place both<br />
through field complaints mechanisms as well as the<br />
whistleblower policy.<br />
FPMG piloted complaints mechanisms in Kenya, South<br />
Sudan, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. This experience<br />
has been gathered together by a consultant to develop<br />
a generic community complaints tool kit to disseminate<br />
to all food aid projects by the end of 2010.<br />
a. Finalise generic software application by<br />
end of 2009.<br />
b. All FPMG food distribution projects are<br />
using a common community complaints<br />
mechanism by 2010.<br />
c. Complaints mechanisms continue to be<br />
established in emergency and nonemergency<br />
settings.<br />
d. Develop and launch a CRM resource guide<br />
in FPMG<br />
e. Write / Publish a briefing paper to share<br />
key processes and lessons from the<br />
piloting of CRM in FPMG<br />
Case Study Example: Good practice in humanitarian accountability and quality management – Summary version<br />
FPMG has had a help desk community feedback mechanism for some time, but it only recently began to be truly accountable to beneficiaries and their<br />
communities. A help desk is a group of five or community members that set up an information point beside food distributions in the field. They are trained<br />
to handle common community queries and to provide information to any community member that requests it. More complicated or contentious queries are<br />
handed up to World Vision staff who then follow up either on the spot or with an investigation as appropriate. In order to make this approach work<br />
125<br />
150