Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001
Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001
Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Providers<br />
Table 18. Providers’ Evaluations<br />
Providers Evaluations<br />
from February <strong>2001</strong> to June 30 <strong>2001</strong><br />
Response total=93 out of 450 sent 21% return<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
6<br />
1<br />
10<br />
2<br />
1<br />
45 40<br />
21<br />
1<br />
2<br />
30<br />
3 4<br />
10<br />
3<br />
5<br />
2<br />
2<br />
36 43 39<br />
Missing<br />
Disagree strongly<br />
Disagree<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
39 41 39<br />
43 41 43<br />
Agree<br />
0%<br />
helpful access calls listen handled outcome<br />
Agree strongly<br />
Provider responses were also very positive. Eighty eight percent of providers who<br />
responded indicated they were satisfied with the outcome of the complaint. Over 84%<br />
of providers agreed the staff were helpful, they were able to access staff who listened<br />
to them and 74% agreed their calls were returned within 24 hours.<br />
Here are some comments that indicate the level of satisfaction providers have:<br />
“Thank you, its nice to have the HSC look after these issues; its becoming<br />
increasingly difficult to satisfy every patient and it seems complaints will become an<br />
ever present reality in medical practice and the HSC has dealt with my case well.”<br />
“I was impressed with the professionalism and the patience of the staff in a difficult<br />
and a time consuming process.”<br />
“As a health service provider I have no complaint with the current procedures of your<br />
office.”<br />
“I appreciate the chance for the complaint to be referred to me to enable an apology<br />
and for the complaint to be handled locally – which turned out to be satisfactory.”<br />
“I appreciated the opportunity to discuss the issue and the courtesy with which I was<br />
treated. I also appreciated the non-judgemental advice, likewise the feedback.”<br />
“Whilst form my point of view a satisfactory outcome was not achieved, your conduct<br />
of this matter was appreciated and approvingly managed.”<br />
While the period of evaluation was limited to 5 months the data indicate an overall<br />
satisfaction with the role of the office in complaint resolution. The evaluation process<br />
<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2000</strong>/<strong>2001</strong> 57