08.01.2014 Views

Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001

Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001

Health Services Commissioner Annual Report 2000/2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Providers<br />

Table 18. Providers’ Evaluations<br />

Providers Evaluations<br />

from February <strong>2001</strong> to June 30 <strong>2001</strong><br />

Response total=93 out of 450 sent 21% return<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

6<br />

1<br />

10<br />

2<br />

1<br />

45 40<br />

21<br />

1<br />

2<br />

30<br />

3 4<br />

10<br />

3<br />

5<br />

2<br />

2<br />

36 43 39<br />

Missing<br />

Disagree strongly<br />

Disagree<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

39 41 39<br />

43 41 43<br />

Agree<br />

0%<br />

helpful access calls listen handled outcome<br />

Agree strongly<br />

Provider responses were also very positive. Eighty eight percent of providers who<br />

responded indicated they were satisfied with the outcome of the complaint. Over 84%<br />

of providers agreed the staff were helpful, they were able to access staff who listened<br />

to them and 74% agreed their calls were returned within 24 hours.<br />

Here are some comments that indicate the level of satisfaction providers have:<br />

“Thank you, its nice to have the HSC look after these issues; its becoming<br />

increasingly difficult to satisfy every patient and it seems complaints will become an<br />

ever present reality in medical practice and the HSC has dealt with my case well.”<br />

“I was impressed with the professionalism and the patience of the staff in a difficult<br />

and a time consuming process.”<br />

“As a health service provider I have no complaint with the current procedures of your<br />

office.”<br />

“I appreciate the chance for the complaint to be referred to me to enable an apology<br />

and for the complaint to be handled locally – which turned out to be satisfactory.”<br />

“I appreciated the opportunity to discuss the issue and the courtesy with which I was<br />

treated. I also appreciated the non-judgemental advice, likewise the feedback.”<br />

“Whilst form my point of view a satisfactory outcome was not achieved, your conduct<br />

of this matter was appreciated and approvingly managed.”<br />

While the period of evaluation was limited to 5 months the data indicate an overall<br />

satisfaction with the role of the office in complaint resolution. The evaluation process<br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2000</strong>/<strong>2001</strong> 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!