08.01.2014 Views

sahr2001 - Health Systems Trust

sahr2001 - Health Systems Trust

sahr2001 - Health Systems Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17 • <strong>Health</strong> and Related Indicators<br />

5. Note: Number of cases: 58 081.<br />

Ref: Stats Notes Jan 2001<br />

6. Note: Number of cases: 151 239. The TBSYS national reporting rate for 2000 was 82.7% (ranging from 40.2% in KZN to 98.8% in WC, not given for MP and NW).<br />

Ref: DOH TB<br />

7. Note: Number of cases: 40 734.<br />

Ref: Stats Notes Jan 2001<br />

8. Ref: DOH TB<br />

9. Note: Personal communication DoH. Data from the annual antenatal surveys.<br />

Ref: DOH Notification<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

The major starting point for all work in this field is the data collected in the<br />

national anonymous survey of HIV prevalence among women attending public<br />

antenatal clinics, performed annually by the Department of <strong>Health</strong>. This<br />

survey involves data collection at sentinel sites, selected on the basis of<br />

systematic random sampling with weighting by the probability proportional<br />

to size (PPS) technique. The following comments from the South African<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Review 2000 (Chapter 15) remain pertinent:<br />

◆ ‘HIV infection levels in the general community in South Africa are<br />

thought to be lower than in the public sector antenatal clinic attendee<br />

population. Children and the elderly, who are at substantially lower<br />

risk of HIV, are not captured by antenatal surveys. Even among adults<br />

in sexually active age groups, the antenatal survey prevalence figures<br />

do not reflect the lower overall risk of men, people who are less sexually<br />

active, and communities using the private sector. On the other hand,<br />

recent studies indicate that fertility among HIV positive women is<br />

substantially lower than among uninfected women, and this suggests<br />

that antenatal data may in fact underestimate HIV prevalence in women<br />

of reproductive age in many communities.’<br />

◆ ‘While these data give some sense of the different risk profiles in the<br />

population, additional surveys serve to remind us that the majority of<br />

the population is at risk of HIV infection and that certain sectors of<br />

the population are at much higher risk of infection than the general<br />

population. Provincial estimates from these data mask large differences<br />

between regions and HIV impacts on specific communities within any<br />

region may differ markedly.’<br />

This section has therefore included a variety of projections from mathematical<br />

simulation models, which are calibrated to antenatal data. These include<br />

estimates of HIV prevalence in the total population, of the number of persons<br />

with symptomatic AIDS, as well as of the number of AIDS orphans. That<br />

these projections vary should not be surprising. This does not however detract<br />

from their general usefulness as planning tools.<br />

Despite the scale and importance of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, there are still<br />

relatively few data available at a provincial or national level, or by population<br />

group.<br />

303

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!