17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION 15<br />

protein per hour of labor than does pastoralism. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

ranching requires vastly greater inputs of energy, <strong>and</strong> expenses incurred<br />

in connection with fencing, water development, brush control,<br />

revegetation, grazing management, <strong>and</strong> selective breeding are substantial.<br />

Pastoral systems represent the principal form of rangel<strong>and</strong> utilization<br />

in Africa <strong>and</strong> Asia. They involve significant social adaptations<br />

to the movement of livestock or wildlife from one location<br />

to another in relation to the availability of forage <strong>and</strong> water. The<br />

rangel<strong>and</strong>s utilized are seldom privately owned, <strong>and</strong> mechanical <strong>and</strong><br />

chemical inputs are seldom prominent. The systems are labor intensive.<br />

It has been estimated that livestock <strong>and</strong> wildlife support<br />

some 30-40 million pastoralists, <strong>and</strong> the animals <strong>and</strong> animal products<br />

associated with pastoral systems are critical to millions of other<br />

individuals in settled communities (International Institute for Environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> Development <strong>and</strong> the World Resources Institute, 1987).<br />

The importance of livestock in pastoral systems exceeds their<br />

value as sources of milk, meat, blood, <strong>and</strong> hides. Livestock often<br />

represent a means of accumulating capital <strong>and</strong>, in some societies, are<br />

associated with social status. They are assets that can reproduce<br />

<strong>and</strong> that can be liquidated should cash be required. In addition to<br />

supporting livestock, rangel<strong>and</strong>s serve as sources of other significant<br />

economic products: bushmeat, fruits, berries, nuts, leaves, flowers,<br />

tubers, <strong>and</strong> other food for human populations, as well as medicinal<br />

plants, building materials, thatch, fencing, gums, tannin, incense,<br />

<strong>and</strong> other products important to the economies of rural populations<br />

(Sale, 1981; National Research Council, 1983; Malhotra, Khomne,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Gadgil, 1983).<br />

The importance of rangel<strong>and</strong>s as sources of bushmeat <strong>and</strong> vegetable<br />

foods for human populations deserves special attention. These<br />

foods are derived from species that are well adapted to the environmental<br />

peculiarities of the regions in which they are found. Hence,<br />

such foods are often available in the event of crop failure or substantial<br />

losses of livestock. Even during periods with average rainfall,<br />

satisfactory crop yields, <strong>and</strong> herd stability, such foods constituted a<br />

significant part of local diets. Indeed, in many societies, the offtake<br />

of wildlife from rangel<strong>and</strong>s exceeds that of livestock in importance.<br />

In 1959, for example, the sedentary <strong>and</strong> pastoral peoples of the<br />

Senegal River Valley in West Africa relied upon fish <strong>and</strong> wildlife<br />

for over 85 percent of the meat that they consumed (Cremoux,<br />

1963); native plants were of equal or greater importance. Since

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!