17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL RANGELANDS<br />

to personal preferences, capabilities, <strong>and</strong> available technologies. The<br />

major factors that influence productivity are determined by the characteristics<br />

-<strong>and</strong> interactions of (1) the physical environment, (2) the<br />

economic environment, <strong>and</strong> (3) the social environment. Subsystems<br />

can be recognized within range systems. Interdependencies <strong>and</strong> interactions<br />

among resources (l<strong>and</strong>, labor, crops, livestock, capital,<br />

water, wood), environment (climate, topography, soil, market), <strong>and</strong><br />

humans (family members, relatives, friends, enemies) are essential<br />

components of the analysis.<br />

The tools for the economic analysis of range systems are essentially<br />

the same as those for conventional farm management studies:<br />

budget analysis by groes margins or partial budgeting, linear programming,<br />

<strong>and</strong> discount procedures. However, when these methods<br />

are applied to a range system, the results have become more reliable,<br />

essentially because previously unidentified factors (inputs as well as<br />

outputs) are taken into account.<br />

Little (1984), however, recommending the systems approach, also<br />

points to two major limitations: the assumption that the household is<br />

the proper unit of analysis, <strong>and</strong> the lack offocus on macro <strong>and</strong> micro<br />

linkages in problem solving. He therefore recommends a combination<br />

of household production <strong>and</strong> regional analysis.<br />

Rangel<strong>and</strong> management systems have been divided into two major<br />

systems: nomadic <strong>and</strong> transhumant. Another distinction is based<br />

on l<strong>and</strong> ownership-that is, pastoral nomadic, open-range ranching,<br />

<strong>and</strong> fenced ranching (Behke, 1984; Lawry et al., 1984). This distinction<br />

is addressed in a later section of this chapter.<br />

Rangel<strong>and</strong> Parmlng SYltems<br />

Within the framework of range systems analysis, relatively little<br />

work has been done on livestock-related issues. Several reasons<br />

account for this neglect:<br />

• Most of the research is done by crop-oriented agronomists<br />

<strong>and</strong> social scientists, neither of whom are familiar with livestock <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore tend to overlook their role.<br />

• Most of the livestock have multiple outputs (such as draft<br />

power, meat, milk, manure, hides, status) <strong>and</strong> non-cash inputs (especially<br />

for ruminants).<br />

• A substantial part of these outputs is used within the household<br />

(for example, draft, manure), <strong>and</strong> therefore only indirectly<br />

contributes to the cash income of the pastoralist.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!