17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IMPROVEMENT 41<br />

rain received by two plots a few kilometers apart (Gilles <strong>and</strong> Jamtgaard,<br />

1981). Nomadism serves to reduce environmental stress <strong>and</strong><br />

personal risk, but it is also more productive than settled livestock<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>ry. In eastern Mrica, in areas of Masai pastoralism, the<br />

grazing capacity of the l<strong>and</strong> is increased 50 percent because of herd<br />

mobility (Western, 1982). In the important livestock-producing areas<br />

of Mrica, comparisons of the productivity of mobile <strong>and</strong> sedentary<br />

herds have indicated the superiority of mobility. In Sudan, Haal<strong>and</strong><br />

(1977) noted substantially higher mortality rates among sedentary<br />

herds than among mobile ones. Breman <strong>and</strong> de Wit (1983) studied<br />

the migratory system based in the Inl<strong>and</strong> Delta of the Niger River in<br />

Mali, <strong>and</strong> found that its productivity often exceeds that ofAustralian<br />

<strong>and</strong> North American ranches.<br />

Other studies in West Mrica have indicated that a disproportionate<br />

number of sedentary cattle were lost in the 1968-1974 Sahelian<br />

drought. Losses of herds that quickly moved into rainier regions in<br />

response to the drought were minimal (Gallais, 1977; Sall, 1978).<br />

Not only were the impacts of drought less severe on mobile herds,<br />

but migrating herds caused less environmental degradation. Loss of<br />

vegetation around boreholes where herds permanently congregated<br />

was 10 severe that it could be easily recopized from satellite photos.<br />

Mobility is an important aspect of production systems in semiarid<br />

<strong>and</strong> marginal areas.<br />

Mobility is just one way to cope with a harsh environment. Diversification<br />

of subsistence activities is another. For farmers, the<br />

ownership of livestock is one diversification strategy. Animals may<br />

survive even when grain yields are quite low, so livestock may represent<br />

a store of capital that can be used in years of drought. Farmers<br />

may also grow a number of different crops to reduce the risk of crop<br />

failure. Wheat <strong>and</strong> barley or maize <strong>and</strong> sorghum may be grown<br />

together because one species tolerates drought better than another.<br />

Diversification goes beyond the diversification of agricultural enterprises.<br />

Farmers may also have secondary occupations, engage in<br />

trade, or in migrant labor to reduce their dependency on a fickle<br />

pastoral environment. In traditional subsistence-oriented societies,<br />

this diversification lessened the dependence on the immediate environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> lessened the probability of ecological disaster.<br />

At first glance, traditional pastoralists would appear to have been<br />

a highly specialized group dependent solely on livestock production,<br />

but in reality these societies were highly diversified. First, multiple<br />

species of animals were raised (figure 2-2). Camels, cattle, sheep,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!