Long-Term Care - Illinois General Assembly
Long-Term Care - Illinois General Assembly
Long-Term Care - Illinois General Assembly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Teach families of residents how to help their relatives when they move into a nursing home,<br />
including what nursing homes’ obligations are to their residents. Tie this into the universal<br />
prescreening.<br />
• Especially since Medicaid reimbursement is going to be based on the Minimum Data Set<br />
(MDS), we need to be checking on the accuracy of the information nursing homes enter in<br />
the MDS. Nobody does that now. Even the annual Public Health survey is a small,<br />
weighted sample of residents. It is unconscionable to pay out so much money with no real<br />
check on where it goes.<br />
• Future Medicaid rate increases should be "targeted" — that is, their use restricted — to<br />
salary for direct care staff and food.<br />
• While in some ways the IDPH website is helpful, the majority of nursing home violations are<br />
not posted, despite the legal mandate that they be there. IDPH should either do the work<br />
itself, or contract with an entity able to do the job.<br />
• Strengthen the ombudsman program. In some areas of the state, the ombudsmen are<br />
vigorous resident advocates; in others they are no more than friendly visitors.<br />
• It would improve residents' lives if high school mandatory service programs expanded to<br />
include having students assigned to specific residents and visit them regularly.<br />
• The Office of State Guardian (OSG) needs both the resources to spend enough time on all<br />
its wards, and the mandate to function with the same vigor as would any private guardian<br />
concerned with a ward's welfare. Unless things have changed very recently, OSG is not<br />
permitted to pull its wards out of a nursing home unless it is actually being decertified or<br />
closed. It never uses what should be its considerable clout to force improvements the<br />
facilities that house its wards. These policies should be changed.<br />
• Increase the personal needs allowance. Nursing home residents on Medicaid are allowed<br />
to keep $30/month of their own income. Everything else goes to the nursing home. This<br />
has gone up $5 in thirty years. If the personal needs allowance had kept pace with inflation,<br />
it would be over $90/month. What this means is that every Social Security cost-of-living<br />
increase residents should be receiving, goes to supplement the Medicaid budget. Residents<br />
are left unable to buy shoes, buy a winter coat or underwear, a newspaper, stationery. They<br />
cannot afford public transportation, go to McDonald's, or go to a movie.<br />
• <strong>Care</strong> in nursing homes will improve only when the people working in them feel personally<br />
obligated to do a good job. The CNA abuse/neglect registry is at least an attempt to hold<br />
CNAs liable for poor care. There is nothing comparable for people higher up on the food<br />
chain. The Department of Professional Regulation does not even open files on the large<br />
majority of referrals the Department of Public Health makes to it, of medical professionals<br />
and nursing home administrators who appear to have violated their responsibilities under<br />
the Nursing Home <strong>Care</strong> Act. Public Health does not bother to make referrals of mandatory<br />
abuse/neglect reporters who ignore their legal obligations.<br />
What this means in practice is illustrated by the situation at Chateau Village in<br />
Willowbrook, where numerous women in the Alzheimer's unit were repeatedly<br />
sexually assaulted over a 16 month period, by 2 male residents who were<br />
housed on the unit even though they did not have dementia. The staff<br />
51