Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
anything random, you will search for patterns within it.<br />
It’s how your brain is built.<br />
• It is uncontrollable. You can’t turn this kind of processing<br />
off or make it go away. (Fortunately, as we’ll see, you<br />
can take steps to counteract it.)<br />
How We Got Our Brains<br />
Why are we cursed with this blessing—or blessed with this<br />
curse—of <strong>com</strong>pulsively seeking patterns in random data? “It’s<br />
a really weird thing,” exclaims Paul Glimcher, a neurobiologist<br />
at New York University’s Center for Neural Science. “I hang out<br />
with my economist friends, and they analyze financial decisionmaking<br />
as if it were a Platonic problem in reasoning. They<br />
don’t have a clue that it’s a biological problem. We’ve got millions<br />
of years of primate evolution behind us. We are biological<br />
organisms. Of course there’s something biological going on!<br />
Evolution must drive the decisions we make when we face the<br />
kinds of situations we evolved to encounter.”<br />
For nearly our entire history as a species, humans were<br />
hunter-gatherers, living in small nomadic bands, seeking mates,<br />
finding shelter, pursuing prey and avoiding predators, foraging<br />
for edible fruits, seeds, and roots. For our earliest ancestors,<br />
decisions were fewer and less <strong>com</strong>plex: Avoid the places where<br />
leopards lurk. Learn the hints of <strong>com</strong>ing rainfall, the clues of<br />
antelope just over the horizon, the signs of fresh water nearby.<br />
Understand who is trustworthy, figure out how to collaborate<br />
with them, learn how to outsmart those who are not. Those<br />
are the kinds of tasks our brains evolved to perform.<br />
“The main difference between us and apes,” explains<br />
anthropologist Todd Preuss of Emory University, “seems to<br />
be less a matter of adding new areas [in the brain], and more<br />
a matter of enlarging existing areas and modifying their<br />
internal machinery to do new and different things. The ‘what<br />
if’ questions, the ‘what will happen when’ questions, the<br />
short-term and long-term consequences of doing X or Y—we<br />
have lots more of the brain where that kind of processing<br />
goes on.” Humans are not the only animals that make tools,<br />
show insight, or plan for the future. But no other species can<br />
match our phenomenal ability to forecast and extrapolate, to<br />
observe correlations, to infer cause from effect.<br />
Our own advanced species, Homo sapiens sapiens, is less<br />
than 200,000 years old. And the human brain has barely<br />
grown since then; in 1997, paleoanthropologists discovered<br />
a 154,000-year-old Homo sapiens skull in Ethiopia. The brain it<br />
once held would have been about 1,450 cubic centimeters in<br />
volume. That is at least three times the volume of a gorilla or<br />
chimpanzee brain—but no smaller than the brain of the average<br />
person living today. Our brains are deeply rooted in the<br />
primeval environments in which our earlier ancestors evolved,<br />
long before Homo sapiens arose. Evolution has not stopped,<br />
but most of the “modern” areas of the human brain, like the<br />
prefrontal cortex, developed largely during the Stone Age.<br />
It’s easy to visualize the ancient East African plain: a highly<br />
variable and camouflaged environment, with alternating<br />
dapples of sun and shade, patches of dense foliage, and rolling<br />
open ground broken by sharply banked streambeds. In<br />
that landscape, extrapolation—figuring out the next link that<br />
would <strong>com</strong>plete a simple pattern of repeating visual cues—<br />
became a vital adaptation for survival. Once a sample of information<br />
yielded the correct answer (ample food, safe shelter),<br />
it would never have occurred to the early hominids to look<br />
for more proof that they had made the right decision. So our<br />
ancestors learned to make the most of small samples of data,<br />
and our investing brains today still specialize in this kind of<br />
“I get it” behavior: perceiving patterns everywhere, leaping<br />
to conclusions from fragmentary evidence, overrelying on the<br />
short run when we plan for the long-term future.<br />
We like to imagine that a long history of technological<br />
advancement stands behind us, but domesticated food crops<br />
and the first cities date back only about 11,000 years. The earliest<br />
known financial markets—in which products like barley,<br />
wheat, millet, chickpeas, and silver were sporadically traded—<br />
sprang up in Mesopotamia around 2500 B.C. And formal markets<br />
with regular trading of stocks and bonds date back only<br />
about four centuries. It took our ancestors more than 6 million<br />
years to progress to that point; if you imagine all of hominid<br />
history inscribed on a scroll one mile long, the first stock<br />
exchange would not show up until four inches from the end.<br />
No wonder our ancient brains find the modern challenges<br />
of investing so hard to manage. The human mind is a highperformance<br />
machine—“a Maserati,” says Baylor College of<br />
Medicine neuroscientist P. Read Montague—when it <strong>com</strong>es<br />
to solving prehistoric problems like recognizing simple<br />
patterns or generating emotional responses with lightning<br />
speed. But it’s not so good at discerning long-term trends,<br />
recognizing when out<strong>com</strong>es are truly random, or focusing<br />
on a multitude of factors at once—challenges that our early<br />
ancestors rarely faced but that your investing brain confronts<br />
every time you log on to a financial Web site, watch CNBC,<br />
talk to a financial advisor, or open the Wall Street Journal.<br />
Why Do You Think They Call It Dopamine?<br />
Wolfram Schultz, a neurophysiologist at the University of<br />
Cambridge in England, has closely cropped grey hair and a<br />
neatly trimmed silver mustache. He is so fastidious that he<br />
turns his office teacups upside down on a towel when he’s<br />
not using them, lest they get dusty. The day I visited him,<br />
the only notable decoration in his office was a poster of the<br />
Rosetta Stone, a reminder of how enormous a task neuroscientists<br />
face as they try to drill down to the biological bedrock<br />
of how we make decisions. A German who spent years teaching<br />
in Switzerland, Schultz seems tailor-made to explore the<br />
microstructure of the brain by monitoring the electrochemical<br />
activity of one neuron at a time.<br />
Schultz specializes in studying dopamine, a chemical in the<br />
brain that helps animals, including humans, figure out how to<br />
take actions that will result in rewards at the right time. Dopamine<br />
signals originate deep in the underbelly of the brain, where your<br />
cerebral machinery connects to your spinal cord. Of the brain’s<br />
roughly 100 billion neurons, well under one-thousandth of 1<br />
percent produce dopamine. But this minuscule neural minority<br />
wields enormous power over your investing decisions.<br />
“Dopamine spreads its fingers all over the brain,” as neuroscientist<br />
Antoine Bechara of the University of Southern California<br />
describes it. When the dopamine neurons light up, they don’t<br />
focus their signals as if they were flashlights aiming at isolated<br />
14<br />
July/August 2008