Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 5<br />
Five Key Issues With Equity Indexes And Their Importance To Investors<br />
What do you think are important <strong>issue</strong>s?<br />
Size biases<br />
37.3% 55.2%<br />
Overinvestment in<br />
overpriced stocks<br />
Sector biases<br />
31.3% 58.2%<br />
40.3% 32.8%<br />
Poor diversifcation<br />
38.8% 29.9%<br />
Lacking of representativity<br />
of the economy<br />
31.3% 25.4%<br />
0% 20%<br />
40% 60% 80% 100%<br />
Important Very Important<br />
Source: EDHEC<br />
Note: The above chart illustrates the percentages of respondents who think five <strong>issue</strong>s that have been discussed in academic literature in relation to equity indexes are important<br />
or very important. The figures are the result of questions that offered the following possible responses: not important; I don’t know; slightly important; important; and very<br />
important. The percentages exclude nonresponses.<br />
Moreover, Hsu [2006] and Arnott and Hsu [2008] have<br />
shown theoretically that cap-weighting automatically<br />
leads to an overinvestment in overpriced stocks; however,<br />
that theory has been shown to be based on flawed<br />
assumptions (see Perold [2007]; and Graham [2012]).<br />
Literature has also evidenced the poor diversification<br />
of cap-weighted indexes, which are often concentrated in<br />
a few large firms (Malevergne et al. [2009]). For example,<br />
Strongin et al. [2000] conclude that the S&P 500 Index<br />
mainly reflects the performance of 86 stocks and the<br />
Russell 1000 of 118. Meanwhile, Bernstein [2003] finds<br />
that the 10 largest <strong>com</strong>panies accounted for 25 percent<br />
of the S&P 500 market value, and the top 25 <strong>com</strong>panies<br />
accounted for 40 percent. In addition, Tabner [2007]<br />
finds a dramatic increase in the concentration of the top<br />
10 firm/sector holdings between 1984 and 2005 for the<br />
FTSE 100 Index. Due to the heavy weightings of the biggest<br />
<strong>com</strong>panies in the index, cap-weighted indexes are<br />
not necessarily providing the diversification-related risk<br />
reduction most investors expect from a benchmark.<br />
The results of the survey (Figure 5) show that size biases<br />
and overinvestment in overpriced stocks were perceived by<br />
the respondents as being the biggest problems with indexes,<br />
with 92.5 and 89.5 percent of respondents, respectively,<br />
finding those <strong>issue</strong>s to be very important or important. In<br />
addition to these concerns that standard cap-weighted<br />
indexes are being exposed to a performance drag, about<br />
73 percent of survey respondents think that biased exposures<br />
to sector factors may be problematic with standard<br />
equity indexes. This concern corroborates findings that the<br />
<strong>com</strong>monly used equity indexes are exposed to significant<br />
shifts in their style or sector exposures (e.g., Amenc et al.<br />
[2006]). About two-thirds of respondents find poor diversification<br />
an important to very important concern. It is<br />
worth noting that respondents do not see the potential lack<br />
of representativity of cap-weighted indexes as the major<br />
<strong>issue</strong>, as only about 57 percent of respondents mentioned<br />
it as important or very important. In conclusion, the main<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s that respondents see with cap-weighted indexes are<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s related to the risk and return properties of indexes.<br />
Bond Indexes<br />
We conducted a similar analysis with <strong>com</strong>mon criticisms<br />
of bond indexes. In fact, fixed-in<strong>com</strong>e benchmarks<br />
are of particular concern because there are several prominent<br />
problems with bond indexes long noted in academic<br />
literature, including the so-called bums problem—the<br />
overweighting of heavily indebted <strong>issue</strong>rs—as well as the<br />
problem of frequently changing characteristics, which<br />
result in fluctuating risk-factor exposures (see e.g., Siegel<br />
[2003]). A more recent study documents unstable duration<br />
and credit ratings over time in corporate bond indexes<br />
(Goltz and Campani [2011]).<br />
Respondents were queried for their opinions on specific<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s with government bond indexes, helping illustrate<br />
that a variety of concerns were held by investors<br />
ranging from practical implementation matters to riskfactor<br />
exposure and risk-factor stability. The results show<br />
that difficulty replicating the index is the main <strong>issue</strong> for<br />
respondents, as 81.6 percent of them consider it important<br />
or very important. Overinvestment in more indebted<br />
countries—an <strong>issue</strong> due to the nature of debt-weighting<br />
indexes—is also a major concern for 65.8 percent of<br />
respondents. This finding parallels those obtained for<br />
equity indexes, where a majority of respondents considered<br />
overinvestment in overpriced stocks to be a critical<br />
<strong>issue</strong>. Lack of liquidity and proprietary pricing models<br />
are also each revealed as important <strong>issue</strong>s for about 63<br />
percent of respondents. Thus, respondents recognize the<br />
<strong>issue</strong>s involved in creating an investable product based<br />
on government bond indexes (difficulties in tracking<br />
and replicability or illiquidity). Other practical concerns<br />
March / April 2013<br />
29