Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JOI: But PERSI’s strategy does seem conservative in the<br />
sense that it seems to be strongly opposed to making<br />
spur-of-the-moment decisions or chasing returns.<br />
Maynard: That is correct. The traditional investment approaches<br />
and modern portfolio theory were built and designed to<br />
work over five- to 15-year periods. That means: Don’t make<br />
quick decisions. Stick to the plan. Expect interim volatility.<br />
If all of a sudden you find yourself in a situation where<br />
you can’t lose a fair amount on a year-to-year basis, you<br />
can’t take the volatility, or you find that your return needs<br />
are more than the market can bear—like endowments,<br />
which have real return needs oftentimes of 7 or 8 or 9 percent<br />
above inflation—then modern portfolio theory gives<br />
you <strong>issue</strong>s. But we don’t have those problems.<br />
JOI: What are the pitfalls for pension fund investing?<br />
What trips up pension fund managers?<br />
Maynard: Switching approaches too often, or chasing<br />
the most recent good idea. Generally, if you look at the<br />
most successful funds over the years, you’ll find that the<br />
You use indexes for a number of different reasons.<br />
First of all, it’s an easy way to see what the market return<br />
would be if you have active management.<br />
ones that have been the most successful stick to the same<br />
investment approach over decades.<br />
And sometimes they’ll do <strong><strong>com</strong>plete</strong>ly different things.<br />
If you look at the Washington State Investment Board,<br />
it’s a stunningly good fund. They do huge amounts of<br />
private equity and always have, much more than we do—<br />
something like 25 percent. Over time, we’ll all get about<br />
the same return. The South Dakota Retirement System<br />
has one of the best investment records in the world over<br />
the last 35 years because they stuck to a certain type of<br />
investment. Whatever investment approach you have,<br />
you need to stick with it in good times and bad—and particularly<br />
the bad times. The market always takes longer to<br />
go through a cycle than you think it will—oftentimes just<br />
beyond that three years that’s the average tenure of the<br />
CIO, or average of five years for a board member. When<br />
you have turnover of staff, they get rid of things that were<br />
put in place by a previous group. Then they leave and<br />
someone else <strong>com</strong>es in. Those are the systems—the ones<br />
without those traditions—that can get in trouble.<br />
In large measure, if you look at a period of time over years<br />
and years, we all kind of end up around the same place, just<br />
at different times. There are different routes to investing, and<br />
you’ve got to pick one and stick with it. For us, because our<br />
liabilities are under control, we stick to basic, market-oriented<br />
investments—we don’t have to try for anything bigger.<br />
JOI: How do you use index-based investment strategies<br />
in the fund?<br />
Maynard: In all of our areas, we have basic, cap-weighted<br />
indices, and that tends to be about a third of our fund.<br />
JOI: Why is cap-weighted the way to go?<br />
Maynard: You use indexes for a number of different reasons.<br />
First of all, it’s an easy way to see what the market<br />
return would be if you have active management. It is an easy<br />
alternative to the active managers or any other approach. It<br />
definitely represents the money-weighted opinion of value.<br />
It gives you the fewest transaction costs: Cap-weighted<br />
automatically rebalances. We’re like big tuna being carved<br />
up like sashimi out there when we go out there and try and<br />
trade, given the high-frequency traders and everything. It<br />
includes pretty much all stocks. You are not leaving some<br />
stocks out like you would with a fundamentally weighted<br />
index. It includes all stocks and all styles. And it may or may<br />
not be the best way to get return for the risk involved, however<br />
you measure risk.<br />
When you hear people talking about different sorts of<br />
indices, like fundamentally weighted indices, their argument<br />
is it makes you more money with less risk. That may or may<br />
not be true—I’m agnostic on that. But clearly other forms of<br />
indices beyond cap weighting don’t address all the other reasons<br />
you use an index in a broad portfolio—easy transaction,<br />
get money in and out, use it to rebalance for other things,<br />
good risk control, easy alternative, all of that stuff.<br />
JOI: How do you evaluate an active manager?<br />
Maynard: We evaluate whether or not they are being<br />
true to their style and with the same sort of resources. If<br />
they are, our basic policy is that we don’t fire for nearterm<br />
performance—and by “near term,” I mean three to<br />
five years. Poor near-term performance can be an indicator<br />
of something going wrong, either that something is<br />
going wrong within the firm or that it is a different firm<br />
than you thought you had. But if you look at them and<br />
they are the same firm, following the same style, picking<br />
Figure 1<br />
PERSI Asset Allocation<br />
December 2012<br />
Source: Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho<br />
www.journalofindexes.<strong>com</strong> March / April 2013 23