28.01.2014 Views

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOI: But PERSI’s strategy does seem conservative in the<br />

sense that it seems to be strongly opposed to making<br />

spur-of-the-moment decisions or chasing returns.<br />

Maynard: That is correct. The traditional investment approaches<br />

and modern portfolio theory were built and designed to<br />

work over five- to 15-year periods. That means: Don’t make<br />

quick decisions. Stick to the plan. Expect interim volatility.<br />

If all of a sudden you find yourself in a situation where<br />

you can’t lose a fair amount on a year-to-year basis, you<br />

can’t take the volatility, or you find that your return needs<br />

are more than the market can bear—like endowments,<br />

which have real return needs oftentimes of 7 or 8 or 9 percent<br />

above inflation—then modern portfolio theory gives<br />

you <strong>issue</strong>s. But we don’t have those problems.<br />

JOI: What are the pitfalls for pension fund investing?<br />

What trips up pension fund managers?<br />

Maynard: Switching approaches too often, or chasing<br />

the most recent good idea. Generally, if you look at the<br />

most successful funds over the years, you’ll find that the<br />

You use indexes for a number of different reasons.<br />

First of all, it’s an easy way to see what the market return<br />

would be if you have active management.<br />

ones that have been the most successful stick to the same<br />

investment approach over decades.<br />

And sometimes they’ll do <strong><strong>com</strong>plete</strong>ly different things.<br />

If you look at the Washington State Investment Board,<br />

it’s a stunningly good fund. They do huge amounts of<br />

private equity and always have, much more than we do—<br />

something like 25 percent. Over time, we’ll all get about<br />

the same return. The South Dakota Retirement System<br />

has one of the best investment records in the world over<br />

the last 35 years because they stuck to a certain type of<br />

investment. Whatever investment approach you have,<br />

you need to stick with it in good times and bad—and particularly<br />

the bad times. The market always takes longer to<br />

go through a cycle than you think it will—oftentimes just<br />

beyond that three years that’s the average tenure of the<br />

CIO, or average of five years for a board member. When<br />

you have turnover of staff, they get rid of things that were<br />

put in place by a previous group. Then they leave and<br />

someone else <strong>com</strong>es in. Those are the systems—the ones<br />

without those traditions—that can get in trouble.<br />

In large measure, if you look at a period of time over years<br />

and years, we all kind of end up around the same place, just<br />

at different times. There are different routes to investing, and<br />

you’ve got to pick one and stick with it. For us, because our<br />

liabilities are under control, we stick to basic, market-oriented<br />

investments—we don’t have to try for anything bigger.<br />

JOI: How do you use index-based investment strategies<br />

in the fund?<br />

Maynard: In all of our areas, we have basic, cap-weighted<br />

indices, and that tends to be about a third of our fund.<br />

JOI: Why is cap-weighted the way to go?<br />

Maynard: You use indexes for a number of different reasons.<br />

First of all, it’s an easy way to see what the market<br />

return would be if you have active management. It is an easy<br />

alternative to the active managers or any other approach. It<br />

definitely represents the money-weighted opinion of value.<br />

It gives you the fewest transaction costs: Cap-weighted<br />

automatically rebalances. We’re like big tuna being carved<br />

up like sashimi out there when we go out there and try and<br />

trade, given the high-frequency traders and everything. It<br />

includes pretty much all stocks. You are not leaving some<br />

stocks out like you would with a fundamentally weighted<br />

index. It includes all stocks and all styles. And it may or may<br />

not be the best way to get return for the risk involved, however<br />

you measure risk.<br />

When you hear people talking about different sorts of<br />

indices, like fundamentally weighted indices, their argument<br />

is it makes you more money with less risk. That may or may<br />

not be true—I’m agnostic on that. But clearly other forms of<br />

indices beyond cap weighting don’t address all the other reasons<br />

you use an index in a broad portfolio—easy transaction,<br />

get money in and out, use it to rebalance for other things,<br />

good risk control, easy alternative, all of that stuff.<br />

JOI: How do you evaluate an active manager?<br />

Maynard: We evaluate whether or not they are being<br />

true to their style and with the same sort of resources. If<br />

they are, our basic policy is that we don’t fire for nearterm<br />

performance—and by “near term,” I mean three to<br />

five years. Poor near-term performance can be an indicator<br />

of something going wrong, either that something is<br />

going wrong within the firm or that it is a different firm<br />

than you thought you had. But if you look at them and<br />

they are the same firm, following the same style, picking<br />

Figure 1<br />

PERSI Asset Allocation<br />

December 2012<br />

Source: Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho<br />

www.journalofindexes.<strong>com</strong> March / April 2013 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!