Hassan Sherwani ROLE OF SALES AND MARKETING IN ... - Oulu

More documents

Recommendations

Info

96 Raft A., and Lord M. 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13 (4),420-441. Ravald,A & Grönroos,C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing. 30 (2), 19-30. Reid, S. D. (1981). The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 101-112. Richard , H. (1989)Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry. Cambridge University Press. Rouziès D, Anderson E, Kohli AK, Michaels RE, Weitz BA & Zoltners AA (2005) Sales and marketing integration: a proposed framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 25(2): 113–122. Rugman, A. M. (1981). Inside the Multinationals: The economics of Internal Markets. Columbia University Press, New York . Rumelt, R. (1984). Towards a Strategic Theory of the firm. In Lamp (Ed.) Competitive Strategic Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Selonen, T. (2010). Customer interface of distribution system operator in the Nordic electricity market, Tampere University of Technology. Sher P, J and Lee V, C. (2004). Information Technology as a Facilitator for Enhancing Dynamic Capabilities through Knowledge Management. Information and Management 41 (8): 933-945. Simon H, A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 125-134. Soman D and Marandi N S (2009), Managing Customer Value: One Stage at a Time, World Scientific, Singapore Spender J, C. (1992). Limits to learning from the West: How Western management advice may prove limited in Eastern Europe. International Executive 34 (5), 389-410. Stanley FS & John CN (2000). Intelligence Generation and Superior Customer Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 28(1), 120-127. Szulanski, G. (2003). Sticky Knowledge – barriers to knowing in the firm. London: Sage Publicatios Ltd. Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-534.
97 Tykesson, D. and Alserud, M(2011). The Uppsala Model’s Applicability on Internationalization Processes of European SMEs, Today. - A Case Study of Three Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Master Thesis. Lund University. TEM(Ministry of Employment and Economy) Report. (20103). Energy. Available: http://www.tem.fi/en/energy. Last accessed 16th Aug 2013 TEM(Ministry of Employment and Economy) Press Release. (20103). Strategy review will ensure that the 2020 energy and climate targets are achieved. Available: http://www.tem.fi/en/energy. Last accessed 16th Aug 2013 Troy C, Hirunyawipada T & Paswan A (2008) Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing 72(6): 132–146. Ulaga,W. and Eggert,A.(2005) Relationship value in business markets: The construct and its dimensions.Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 12 (1) , 73–99. Valocchi , M. , Schurr ,A. Juliano , J. and Nelson, E. (2007). Plugging in the consumer: Innovating utility business models for the future. Available: http://www- 935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/ bus/pdf/ibv_g510-7872-00_plugging_in.pdf. Last accessed 2nd July 2013. Valocchi , M. , Juliano , J. and Schurr , A. (2009). Lighting the way: Understanding the smart energy consumer. Available: ftp://ftp.software.ibm. com/common/ssi/pm/xb/n/gbe03187usen/ GBE03187USEN.PDF. Last accessed 2nd July 2013. Valocchi , M. , Juliano , J and Schurr , A. (2010). Switching perspectives Creating new business models for a changing world of energy. Available: http://www- 935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/html/ibv-electric-utility-innovation.html. Last accessed 2nd July 2013. Van den Steen, E. (2005). Organizational beliefs and managerial vision. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21(1), 256-283. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17. Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2008a) Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. Vargo, S.L, Maglio,P.P , Akaka,M.A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal. 26 , 145– 152. Vargo, S.L. and Akaka, M.A. (2009): Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications. Service Science 1(1):32-41.
Page 1 and 2:
OULU BUSINESS SCHOOL Hassan Sherwan
Page 3 and 4:
3 CONTENTS Abstract Contents Figure
Page 5 and 6:
5 Figures Figure 1: The scope of th
Page 7 and 8:
7 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction a
Page 9 and 10:
9 Electricity industry used to be c
Page 11 and 12:
11 Monopoly: A market with a single
Page 13 and 14:
13 2 RESEARCH CONTEXT This chapter
Page 15 and 16:
15 produced but, resources to gener
Page 17 and 18:
17 through bioenergy largely in the
Page 19 and 20:
19 framework. There is a need to re
Page 21 and 22:
21 the companies make themselves en
Page 23 and 24:
23 Monopoly Traditional Model Value
Page 25 and 26:
25 once a company at local market a
Page 27 and 28:
27 It is vital to notice that these
Page 29 and 30:
29 In the global arena, companies m
Page 31 and 32:
31 known as Uppsala Model and is wi
Page 33 and 34:
33 vital part so the parties must a
Page 35 and 36:
35 provides to the company, in the
Page 37 and 38:
37 way of achieving this goal is to
Page 39 and 40:
39 Figure 7: The Emerging Concept o
Page 41 and 42:
41 who actually creates values and
Page 43 and 44:
43 value of the organization in its
Page 45 and 46: 45 being an extension to resource b
Page 47 and 48: 47 knowledge management process is
Page 49 and 50: 49 widely agreed on the negative ef
Page 51 and 52: 51 need to be coordinated and consi
Page 53 and 54: 53 responsibilities, and of the int
Page 55 and 56: 55 is equally important to manage i
Page 57 and 58: 57 All these four stages are follow
Page 59 and 60: 59 5 ANALYSIS As there was a brief
Page 61 and 62: 61 company’s individual needs irr
Page 63 and 64: 63 In other words, the market is fr
Page 65 and 66: 65 to seek more control in their en
Page 67 and 68: 67 themselves, who may be capable o
Page 69 and 70: 69 to enhance innovation (Pomeda &
Page 71 and 72: 71 Marketing is responsible for dev
Page 73 and 74: 73 Customer satisfaction is conside
Page 75 and 76: 75 clear picture of the role and co
Page 77 and 78: 77 more and more companies operatin
Page 79 and 80: 79 What level of integration betwee
Page 81 and 82: 81 There is a good opportunity to i
Page 83 and 84: 83 internationalization in Finnish
Page 85 and 86: 85 chaos within the company and man
Page 87 and 88: 87 In this thesis work, though the
Page 89 and 90: 89 described by Valocchi et al. (20
Page 91 and 92: 91 Cavusgil, S. T. (1980). On the I
Page 93 and 94: 93 Henry, A. (2008). Understanding
Page 95: 95 Metaxiotis K, Ergazakis K and Ps
Page 99 and 100: 99 APPENDICES Interview Questions:
Page 101: 101 Are you familiar with va
show all

Hassan Sherwani ROLE OF SALES AND MARKETING IN ... - Oulu

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?