tall-buildings
tall-buildings
tall-buildings
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MIDDLE (TOWER) } TALL BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES<br />
3.2.3 SEPARATION DISTANCES CONT.<br />
AVOID<br />
Adequate minimum separation<br />
distance between <strong>buildings</strong><br />
(25m or greater) promotes<br />
privacy, daylighting and at-grade<br />
access to sunlight and sky view<br />
Figure 5: Adequate minimum<br />
tower separation distances,<br />
measured from closest building<br />
face to building face, protect<br />
access to sunlight and sky view<br />
for the surrounding public realm<br />
and neighbouring properties, and<br />
improve privacy and daylighting<br />
within <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong>.<br />
Towers with inadequate<br />
minimum separation distance<br />
(less than 25m)<br />
Variation in tower<br />
stepbacks and orientation<br />
increase perceived and<br />
actual separation distance<br />
RATIONALE cont.<br />
Where a new <strong>tall</strong> building is proposed adjacent to an existing<br />
<strong>tall</strong> building or a potential <strong>tall</strong> building development site,<br />
matters of sunlight, sky view, privacy, and daylighting become<br />
even more critical since the cumulative effect of a cluster of<br />
towers on a street, park, open space, or in relation to each<br />
other and neighbours can amplify quality of life concerns for<br />
both the public and private realms. Even if <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> in close<br />
proximity to other <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> meet the minimum required<br />
separation distances, setbacks, and stepbacks, towers should<br />
be further shaped, placed, and articulated to increase the actual<br />
and perceived distances between adjacent building elevations.<br />
Since <strong>tall</strong> building development is typically evaluated on a<br />
site-by-site basis, it is important to understand the cumulative<br />
effect of the proposed <strong>tall</strong> building within the context of other<br />
<strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> (see also 1.1 Context Analysis). One test for the<br />
appropriateness of proposed tower setbacks and separation<br />
distances is to replicate the proposal on adjacent sites or<br />
blocks. The cumulative effect should result in acceptable<br />
outcomes for shadowing, access to sky view, privacy, and<br />
daylighting (see also 1.4 Sunlight and Sky View).<br />
If towers are permitted to locate too close to side or rear<br />
property lines, the result is a “first-to-the-post” development<br />
scenario, whereby the need to provide access to sunlight, sky<br />
view, privacy, and daylighting, may restrict adjacent sites from<br />
developing in a similar manner.<br />
CITY OF TORONTO<br />
MAY 2013<br />
Official Plan Reference<br />
2.3.1 Healthy Neighbourhoods: Policy 2c | 3.1.2 Built Form: Policy 3c, 3d, 3e and 4 | 3.1.3 Built Form - Tall Buildings: Policy 1b<br />
Related Standards, Guidelines & Studies<br />
Sun, Wind and Pedestrian Comfort: A Study of Toronto’s Central Area<br />
50