03.02.2014 Views

tall-buildings

tall-buildings

tall-buildings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIDDLE (TOWER) } TALL BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES<br />

3.2.3 SEPARATION DISTANCES CONT.<br />

AVOID<br />

Adequate minimum separation<br />

distance between <strong>buildings</strong><br />

(25m or greater) promotes<br />

privacy, daylighting and at-grade<br />

access to sunlight and sky view<br />

Figure 5: Adequate minimum<br />

tower separation distances,<br />

measured from closest building<br />

face to building face, protect<br />

access to sunlight and sky view<br />

for the surrounding public realm<br />

and neighbouring properties, and<br />

improve privacy and daylighting<br />

within <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong>.<br />

Towers with inadequate<br />

minimum separation distance<br />

(less than 25m)<br />

Variation in tower<br />

stepbacks and orientation<br />

increase perceived and<br />

actual separation distance<br />

RATIONALE cont.<br />

Where a new <strong>tall</strong> building is proposed adjacent to an existing<br />

<strong>tall</strong> building or a potential <strong>tall</strong> building development site,<br />

matters of sunlight, sky view, privacy, and daylighting become<br />

even more critical since the cumulative effect of a cluster of<br />

towers on a street, park, open space, or in relation to each<br />

other and neighbours can amplify quality of life concerns for<br />

both the public and private realms. Even if <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> in close<br />

proximity to other <strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> meet the minimum required<br />

separation distances, setbacks, and stepbacks, towers should<br />

be further shaped, placed, and articulated to increase the actual<br />

and perceived distances between adjacent building elevations.<br />

Since <strong>tall</strong> building development is typically evaluated on a<br />

site-by-site basis, it is important to understand the cumulative<br />

effect of the proposed <strong>tall</strong> building within the context of other<br />

<strong>tall</strong> <strong>buildings</strong> (see also 1.1 Context Analysis). One test for the<br />

appropriateness of proposed tower setbacks and separation<br />

distances is to replicate the proposal on adjacent sites or<br />

blocks. The cumulative effect should result in acceptable<br />

outcomes for shadowing, access to sky view, privacy, and<br />

daylighting (see also 1.4 Sunlight and Sky View).<br />

If towers are permitted to locate too close to side or rear<br />

property lines, the result is a “first-to-the-post” development<br />

scenario, whereby the need to provide access to sunlight, sky<br />

view, privacy, and daylighting, may restrict adjacent sites from<br />

developing in a similar manner.<br />

CITY OF TORONTO<br />

MAY 2013<br />

Official Plan Reference<br />

2.3.1 Healthy Neighbourhoods: Policy 2c | 3.1.2 Built Form: Policy 3c, 3d, 3e and 4 | 3.1.3 Built Form - Tall Buildings: Policy 1b<br />

Related Standards, Guidelines & Studies<br />

Sun, Wind and Pedestrian Comfort: A Study of Toronto’s Central Area<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!