09.02.2014 Views

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

Download - Royal Australian Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 AUSTRALIAN MARITIME ISSUES 2006: SPC-A ANNUAL<br />

and other civil maritime law enforcement agencies. (These latter two concerns, if not<br />

addressed in a careful fashion, could have unfavourable implications for funding of<br />

future navy force structures and budgets.) Finally, there is the concern that the 1000-<br />

Ship <strong>Navy</strong> shorthand title of the initiative does not accurately reflect a concept that<br />

explicitly encompasses more than just navies. Accordingly, the USN in late September<br />

2006 adopted a new official name, Global Maritime Partnership, for this initiative.<br />

Implementing the Global Maritime Partnership<br />

As the USN moves to actual implementation of this concept, there are several possible<br />

frameworks for implementation. First, it may be useful for the USN to categorise its<br />

efforts in terms of Blue Water Navies (Global Partners), Green Water Navies (Regional<br />

Partners) and Coastal Navies (Sub-regional Partners) — notwithstanding inevitable<br />

differences over which category best describes some national maritime forces. Second,<br />

it would be advisable to establish a building block approach to assess and leverage<br />

various existing regional maritime cooperation initiatives into the context of a broader<br />

global network. Third, there is much work to be done to identify how the USN can best<br />

engage and lead the integration of interagency and private maritime sector partners.<br />

Fourth, there is a need to identify the availability of technology (e.g. data fusion) and<br />

also to ensure realistic basic technology/interoperability requirements for the various<br />

categories of navies to participate in the global maritime network, with the caution that<br />

the best is often the enemy of the good enough in this area. Finally, internally the USN<br />

staff, specifically N3/N5, with its lead role in drafting the Global Maritime Cooperation<br />

Strategy, will need to provide a focal point for coordinating and implementing the<br />

1000-Ship <strong>Navy</strong> initiative, both within the USN and in the broader interagency and<br />

international arenas. Within the USN some potential important coordination roles<br />

include being the clearinghouse / coordinator / integrator at the global level for the<br />

regional USN Component Commanders’ theatre maritime security cooperation plans;<br />

providing strategic templates for assistance (e.g. model <strong>Navy</strong> Transformation Plans)<br />

to emerging coastal maritime forces; aligning the Security Assistance programs of<br />

the USN International Programs Office; coordinating training assets with the US<br />

Coast Guard International Programs Office; and coordinating maintenance assistance<br />

planning for relevant international maritime partners with the USN Naval Sea Systems<br />

Command.<br />

RAN Leadership Views on the 1000-Ship <strong>Navy</strong> Concept<br />

RAN Chief of <strong>Navy</strong> Vice Admiral Russ Shalders clearly outlined his views on the concept<br />

as part of a March 2006 article in the US Naval Institute Proceedings:<br />

• The 1000-Ship <strong>Navy</strong> concept builds on the historic common interest of mariners<br />

and is a logical extension of the outcomes of globalisation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!