15.02.2014 Views

Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner

Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner

Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter TWO<br />

Handling complaints<br />

A civil complaint involves a civil dispute.<br />

A civil dispute is any one of the following:<br />

• a “costs dispute” between a legal practitioner or<br />

law practice and client in relation to legal costs<br />

not exceeding $25,000;<br />

• a claim that a person has suffered a pecuniary loss<br />

as a result of an act or omission by a law practice<br />

or legal practitioner;<br />

• any other genuine dispute between a person and<br />

a law practice or legal practitioner.<br />

Case Study<br />

Civil Complaint (Costs Dispute)<br />

Lawyer charged for work, even though client said she did not<br />

instruct lawyer to perform the work<br />

Eloise sought advice from a lawyer<br />

about setting up a new company. The<br />

lawyer suggested that a shareholders’<br />

agreement should be created, and<br />

proceeded to draft the agreement. The<br />

draft was given to Eloise to look over.<br />

However Eloise did not think that a<br />

shareholder agreement was necessary,<br />

and so she instructed the lawyer not to<br />

proceed with the document.<br />

Eloise later received a bill from the<br />

lawyer for $1,457. The lawyer’s bill was<br />

for drafting the shareholders’ agreement.<br />

Eloise did not want to pay for the bill<br />

because the draft document appeared to<br />

be a standard shareholders’ agreement<br />

with several errors. In any event, Eloise<br />

had already told the lawyer that she did<br />

not want to proceed with the agreement.<br />

Eloise rang the lawyer to dispute the bill,<br />

but the lawyer told her “bad luck, you<br />

have to pay it.”<br />

Eloise then made a complaint to the<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong>. She also<br />

lodged the disputed amount ($1,457)<br />

with the <strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> so<br />

that the office could attempt to resolve<br />

the dispute. The lawyer explained to the<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> that he was<br />

only charging for work he had performed<br />

for Eloise. He was also concerned that<br />

“Eloise did not want to pay for the<br />

bill because the draft document<br />

appeared to be a standard<br />

shareholders’ agreement with<br />

several errors.”<br />

if he agreed to waive Eloise’s bill, then<br />

there was nothing stopping Eloise<br />

from using the draft agreement he had<br />

prepared. Therefore the lawyer told the<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> that he<br />

would agree to waive the bill if Eloise<br />

agreed to sign a statutory declaration<br />

saying that she had destroyed the draft<br />

agreement. Eloise was satisfied with the<br />

offer and accepted it.<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> COMMISSIONER 20<strong>09</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!