Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner
Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner
Annual Report 2008-09 - Legal Services Commissioner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter TWO<br />
Handling complaints<br />
A civil complaint involves a civil dispute.<br />
A civil dispute is any one of the following:<br />
• a “costs dispute” between a legal practitioner or<br />
law practice and client in relation to legal costs<br />
not exceeding $25,000;<br />
• a claim that a person has suffered a pecuniary loss<br />
as a result of an act or omission by a law practice<br />
or legal practitioner;<br />
• any other genuine dispute between a person and<br />
a law practice or legal practitioner.<br />
Case Study<br />
Civil Complaint (Costs Dispute)<br />
Lawyer charged for work, even though client said she did not<br />
instruct lawyer to perform the work<br />
Eloise sought advice from a lawyer<br />
about setting up a new company. The<br />
lawyer suggested that a shareholders’<br />
agreement should be created, and<br />
proceeded to draft the agreement. The<br />
draft was given to Eloise to look over.<br />
However Eloise did not think that a<br />
shareholder agreement was necessary,<br />
and so she instructed the lawyer not to<br />
proceed with the document.<br />
Eloise later received a bill from the<br />
lawyer for $1,457. The lawyer’s bill was<br />
for drafting the shareholders’ agreement.<br />
Eloise did not want to pay for the bill<br />
because the draft document appeared to<br />
be a standard shareholders’ agreement<br />
with several errors. In any event, Eloise<br />
had already told the lawyer that she did<br />
not want to proceed with the agreement.<br />
Eloise rang the lawyer to dispute the bill,<br />
but the lawyer told her “bad luck, you<br />
have to pay it.”<br />
Eloise then made a complaint to the<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong>. She also<br />
lodged the disputed amount ($1,457)<br />
with the <strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> so<br />
that the office could attempt to resolve<br />
the dispute. The lawyer explained to the<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> that he was<br />
only charging for work he had performed<br />
for Eloise. He was also concerned that<br />
“Eloise did not want to pay for the<br />
bill because the draft document<br />
appeared to be a standard<br />
shareholders’ agreement with<br />
several errors.”<br />
if he agreed to waive Eloise’s bill, then<br />
there was nothing stopping Eloise<br />
from using the draft agreement he had<br />
prepared. Therefore the lawyer told the<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> that he<br />
would agree to waive the bill if Eloise<br />
agreed to sign a statutory declaration<br />
saying that she had destroyed the draft<br />
agreement. Eloise was satisfied with the<br />
offer and accepted it.<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> COMMISSIONER 20<strong>09</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 9