- Page 2 and 3:
Jan Gliński, Grzegorz Józefaciuk,
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS PART A: GAS EXCHANGE Revie
- Page 6 and 7:
SOIL - PLANT - ATMOSPHERE AERATION
- Page 8 and 9:
In single observations, rates of N
- Page 10 and 11:
than in the night while CH 4 uptake
- Page 12 and 13:
Pumpanen et al. (2003b) measured wi
- Page 14 and 15:
5. Liikanen A 2002. Greenhouse gas
- Page 16 and 17:
EFFECT OF SOIL TILLAGE AND COMPACTI
- Page 18 and 19:
Cumulative CO 2 (kg C ha -1 ) 600 F
- Page 20 and 21:
Soil depth (mm) 0 20 40 60 80 Diffu
- Page 22 and 23:
METHANE Main suppliers to the atmos
- Page 24 and 25:
3. Emission of N 2 O is higher from
- Page 26 and 27:
30. Kusa, K., Sawamoto, T., Hatano,
- Page 28 and 29:
GAS EMISSION FROM WETLANDS Stępnie
- Page 30 and 31:
ater retention capacity in the chan
- Page 32 and 33:
zone, while in Nadrybie lake the le
- Page 34 and 35:
Eh 350 300 250 mV 200 150 100 50 0
- Page 36 and 37:
Table 1. Sources and sinks of atmos
- Page 38 and 39:
Fig. 1. Quasi - equilibrium methane
- Page 40 and 41:
Fig. 5. Concentration of nitrous ox
- Page 42 and 43:
drooxygenology, such subbranches as
- Page 44 and 45:
Fig. 3. Soil microbial respiration
- Page 46 and 47:
NITROUS OXIDE EMISSION FROM SOILS W
- Page 48 and 49:
N2O-N [mg kg -1 ] 100 80 60 40 20 0
- Page 50 and 51:
7. McKenney, D.J., C.F. Drury, and
- Page 52 and 53:
AERATION STATUS OF SOIL AND ENZYME
- Page 54 and 55:
Catalase is heme-containing enzyme
- Page 56 and 57:
8. Deng S., Dick R. Sulfur oxidatio
- Page 58 and 59:
The number of profiles representing
- Page 60 and 61:
tics (Stępniewski et al., in press
- Page 62 and 63:
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY OF SOIL POROUS ME
- Page 64 and 65:
The bulk of non-rhizosphere soil is
- Page 66 and 67:
RELATIONS The relations between soi
- Page 68 and 69:
23. Mamilov A.Sh., Byzov, B.A. Zvya
- Page 70 and 71:
silts. The content of C org in the
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 2. Continued Location Day of
- Page 74 and 75:
5 o C Eh (mV 400 300 200 100 1A 1B
- Page 76 and 77:
STRUCTURE FORMATION AND ITS CONSEQU
- Page 78 and 79:
when water content differences are
- Page 80 and 81:
authors stated that O 2 gradients i
- Page 82 and 83:
strength of the already existing st
- Page 84 and 85:
source of transforming DNA for Acin
- Page 86 and 87:
THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF THE RHIZOSPHERE
- Page 88 and 89:
der field conditions r-strategists
- Page 90 and 91:
22. Tarafdar JC and Jungk A 1987. P
- Page 92 and 93: ics behavior have been published (K
- Page 94 and 95: Activity of dehydrogenase (DHA) was
- Page 96 and 97: The rather small concentration of A
- Page 98 and 99: The effect of the pesticide dosage
- Page 100 and 101: METHANOTROPHIC ACTIVITY OF COAL MIN
- Page 102 and 103: GC TESTS Air-tight bottles (60 ml)
- Page 104 and 105: dumping. For older rock samples, af
- Page 106 and 107: SOIL - PLANT - ATMOSPHERE AERATION
- Page 108 and 109: - properties of plant surface and c
- Page 110 and 111: mination, should be considered.The
- Page 112 and 113: Considering a possibility of detect
- Page 114 and 115: SURFACE PROPERTIES OF SOILS AND THE
- Page 116 and 117: clay content the latter processes p
- Page 118 and 119: der alkaline treatment the silica o
- Page 120 and 121: COMPACTION EFFECTS ON SOIL PHYSICAL
- Page 122 and 123: suming and expensive regression-bas
- Page 124 and 125: CROP RESPONSE Roots A characteristi
- Page 126 and 127: CONCLUSIONS Alterations in the aggr
- Page 128 and 129: 27. Keller, T., Arvidsson, J., Dawi
- Page 130 and 131: MONITORING OF POROUS MEDIA PROCESSE
- Page 132 and 133: - temperature: semiconductor, therm
- Page 134 and 135: This is the reason why the optimisa
- Page 136 and 137: CONCEPTS AND MORPHOLOGY OF HYDROMOR
- Page 138 and 139: conditions applied to the soil samp
- Page 140 and 141: ESTIMATION OF THE HYDROPHYSICAL CHA
- Page 144 and 145: The experimental field is located a
- Page 146: Nannipieri Paolo Ostrowska Aneta Os