RELATIONS The relations between <strong>soil</strong> organisms (especially competition and predator:prey interactions) are of great importance for microbial community structure and diversity, as well as for the decomposition of natural substrates and thus for biogeochemistry of ecosystems (Mamilov et al., 1001; Torsvik and Øvreås 2002). There are some mechanisms by which the <strong>soil</strong> microbiota and their predators are able to coexist in <strong>soil</strong>. These mechanisms include location of the <strong>soil</strong> microorganisms in pores of sufficiently small neck diameters to prevent access of larger predators (mainly protozoa and nematodes) and critical prey densities (cell numbers or biomass per unit of <strong>soil</strong> pore volume) below which too little energy is obtained by the predator to maintain its active search for food (Ladd et al., 1996). Crawford et al. (1993) calculated that about half of the potential habitable area for a bacterium of 5 µm diameter would be accessible to a predator of 30 µm (for example amoebal pseudopodia can penetrate pores to gain access to bacteria). It has been generally accepted that bacteria are protected from flagellates, nematodes, and ciliates in pores with entry neck sizes
3. Burns R.G. 1989 Microbial and enzymic activities in <strong>soil</strong> biofilms. In: Structure and Function of Biofilms, W.G. Characklis and P.A. Wilderer eds. John Wiley & Sons, London, pp. 333-350. 4. Crawford J.W., Ritz K., Young I.M. 1993 Quantification of fungal morphology, gaseous transport and microbial dynamics in <strong>soil</strong>: an integrated framework utilizing fractal geometry. Geoderma 56, 157-172. 5. Darbyshire J.F. 1976 Effect of water suctions on the growth in <strong>soil</strong> of the ciliate Colpoda steini and the bacterium Azotobacter chroococcum. J. Soil Sci. 227, 369-376. 6. Dighton J., Jones H.E., Robinson C.H. and Beckett J. 1997 The role of abiotic factors, cultivation practices and <strong>soil</strong> fauna in the dispersal of genetically modified microorganisms in <strong>soil</strong>. Appl. Soil Ecol. 5, 109-131. 7. Foster R.C. 1988 Microenvironments of <strong>soil</strong> microorganisms. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 189- 203. 8. Gannon J.T., Mingelgrin U., Alexander M. and Wagenet R.J. 1991 Bacterial transport through homogenous <strong>soil</strong>. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 1155-1160. 9. Gerba C.P., Yates M.V., Yates S.R. 1991 Quantitation of factors controlling viral and bacterial transport in the subsurface. In: C.J. Hurst Ed.. Modelling the Environmental Fate of Microorganisms. Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology. 10. Ginn T.R., Wood B.D., Nelson K.E., Scheibe T.D., Murphy E.M. and Clement T.P. 2002 Processes in microbial transport in the natural subsurface. Adv. Water Res. 25, 1017-1042. 11. Gliński J, Lipiec J. 1990 Soil Physical Conditions and Plant Roots. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 12. Gliński J, Stępniewski W. 1985 Soil Aeration and its Role for Plants CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 13. Hassink J., Bouvman L.A., Zwart K.B., Brussard L. 1993. Relationship between habiable pore space. Soil biota and mineralisation rates in grassland <strong>soil</strong>s. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 47-55. 14. Hattori T. 1988 Soil aggregates as microhabitats of microorganisms. Biol. Fertil Soils. 6, 189-203. 15. Horn R., Stępniewski W., Włodarczyk T., Walenzik G., Eckhardt F.E.W. 1994 Denitrification rate and microbial distribution within homogenous model <strong>soil</strong> aggregates. Int. Agrophysics 8, 65-74. 16. Kandeller E., Palli S., Stemmer M., Gerzabek M.H. 1999 Tillage changes in microbial biomass and enzyme activities in particle-size fractions of a Haplic Chernozem Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1253-1264. 17. Kilbertus G. 1980 Study of microhabitats in <strong>soil</strong> aggregates – Relation to bacterial biomass and size of prokaryotes. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol 17, 543-557. 18. Kuikman P.J., Jansen A.G., van Veen J.A. 1991 15 N-mineralization from bacteria by protozoan grazing at different <strong>soil</strong> moisture regimes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 193-200. 19. Ladd J.N., Foster R.C., Nannipieri P. and Oades J.M. 1996 Soil structure and biological activity. In: Soil Biochemistry, Vol. 9 Stocky G. and Bollag J.M. Eds. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, Basel, Hong Kong. Chapter 2, pp. 23-78. 20. Lavelle P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Spain A.V., Toutain F., Barois I., Schaefer R. 1993 A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to <strong>soil</strong>s of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25, 130-150. 21. Lipiec J., Hatano R. 2003 Quantification of compaction effects on <strong>soil</strong> physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma 116, 107-136. 22. Lynch J.M., Bragg E. 1985 Microorganisms and <strong>soil</strong> aggregate stability. Adv. Soil Sci. 2, 133-171. 70
- Page 2 and 3:
Jan Gliński, Grzegorz Józefaciuk,
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS PART A: GAS EXCHANGE Revie
- Page 6 and 7:
SOIL - PLANT - ATMOSPHERE AERATION
- Page 8 and 9:
In single observations, rates of N
- Page 10 and 11:
than in the night while CH 4 uptake
- Page 12 and 13:
Pumpanen et al. (2003b) measured wi
- Page 14 and 15:
5. Liikanen A 2002. Greenhouse gas
- Page 16 and 17: EFFECT OF SOIL TILLAGE AND COMPACTI
- Page 18 and 19: Cumulative CO 2 (kg C ha -1 ) 600 F
- Page 20 and 21: Soil depth (mm) 0 20 40 60 80 Diffu
- Page 22 and 23: METHANE Main suppliers to the atmos
- Page 24 and 25: 3. Emission of N 2 O is higher from
- Page 26 and 27: 30. Kusa, K., Sawamoto, T., Hatano,
- Page 28 and 29: GAS EMISSION FROM WETLANDS Stępnie
- Page 30 and 31: ater retention capacity in the chan
- Page 32 and 33: zone, while in Nadrybie lake the le
- Page 34 and 35: Eh 350 300 250 mV 200 150 100 50 0
- Page 36 and 37: Table 1. Sources and sinks of atmos
- Page 38 and 39: Fig. 1. Quasi - equilibrium methane
- Page 40 and 41: Fig. 5. Concentration of nitrous ox
- Page 42 and 43: drooxygenology, such subbranches as
- Page 44 and 45: Fig. 3. Soil microbial respiration
- Page 46 and 47: NITROUS OXIDE EMISSION FROM SOILS W
- Page 48 and 49: N2O-N [mg kg -1 ] 100 80 60 40 20 0
- Page 50 and 51: 7. McKenney, D.J., C.F. Drury, and
- Page 52 and 53: AERATION STATUS OF SOIL AND ENZYME
- Page 54 and 55: Catalase is heme-containing enzyme
- Page 56 and 57: 8. Deng S., Dick R. Sulfur oxidatio
- Page 58 and 59: The number of profiles representing
- Page 60 and 61: tics (Stępniewski et al., in press
- Page 62 and 63: MICROBIAL ECOLOGY OF SOIL POROUS ME
- Page 64 and 65: The bulk of non-rhizosphere soil is
- Page 68 and 69: 23. Mamilov A.Sh., Byzov, B.A. Zvya
- Page 70 and 71: silts. The content of C org in the
- Page 72 and 73: Table 2. Continued Location Day of
- Page 74 and 75: 5 o C Eh (mV 400 300 200 100 1A 1B
- Page 76 and 77: STRUCTURE FORMATION AND ITS CONSEQU
- Page 78 and 79: when water content differences are
- Page 80 and 81: authors stated that O 2 gradients i
- Page 82 and 83: strength of the already existing st
- Page 84 and 85: source of transforming DNA for Acin
- Page 86 and 87: THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF THE RHIZOSPHERE
- Page 88 and 89: der field conditions r-strategists
- Page 90 and 91: 22. Tarafdar JC and Jungk A 1987. P
- Page 92 and 93: ics behavior have been published (K
- Page 94 and 95: Activity of dehydrogenase (DHA) was
- Page 96 and 97: The rather small concentration of A
- Page 98 and 99: The effect of the pesticide dosage
- Page 100 and 101: METHANOTROPHIC ACTIVITY OF COAL MIN
- Page 102 and 103: GC TESTS Air-tight bottles (60 ml)
- Page 104 and 105: dumping. For older rock samples, af
- Page 106 and 107: SOIL - PLANT - ATMOSPHERE AERATION
- Page 108 and 109: - properties of plant surface and c
- Page 110 and 111: mination, should be considered.The
- Page 112 and 113: Considering a possibility of detect
- Page 114 and 115: SURFACE PROPERTIES OF SOILS AND THE
- Page 116 and 117:
clay content the latter processes p
- Page 118 and 119:
der alkaline treatment the silica o
- Page 120 and 121:
COMPACTION EFFECTS ON SOIL PHYSICAL
- Page 122 and 123:
suming and expensive regression-bas
- Page 124 and 125:
CROP RESPONSE Roots A characteristi
- Page 126 and 127:
CONCLUSIONS Alterations in the aggr
- Page 128 and 129:
27. Keller, T., Arvidsson, J., Dawi
- Page 130 and 131:
MONITORING OF POROUS MEDIA PROCESSE
- Page 132 and 133:
- temperature: semiconductor, therm
- Page 134 and 135:
This is the reason why the optimisa
- Page 136 and 137:
CONCEPTS AND MORPHOLOGY OF HYDROMOR
- Page 138 and 139:
conditions applied to the soil samp
- Page 140 and 141:
ESTIMATION OF THE HYDROPHYSICAL CHA
- Page 142 and 143:
Fig. 6. Scheme of EURO-ACCESS-II mo
- Page 144 and 145:
The experimental field is located a
- Page 146:
Nannipieri Paolo Ostrowska Aneta Os