14.03.2014 Views

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 (2011) 093001<br />

Topical Review<br />

Figure 78. Imperial College gas-embedded <strong>pinch</strong>; number density pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> electrons and neutrals<br />

during preheating phase at a filling pressure <strong>of</strong> 0.3 bar [182, figure 3]. Reprinted with permission<br />

from <strong>the</strong> IAEA.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>ir conceptual fusion reactor based on <strong>the</strong> high plasma density Z-<strong>pinch</strong> Hartman<br />

et al [552] considered that one means <strong>of</strong> isolating <strong>the</strong> Z-<strong>pinch</strong> is by a <strong>dense</strong> blanket <strong>of</strong> cold<br />

neutral gas. Two <strong>pinch</strong> cycles were considered, one where <strong>the</strong> <strong>pinch</strong> was sufficiently long to<br />

minimize plasma flow out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ends and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r where refuelling occurred by plasma flow,<br />

e.g. using axial flow as proposed by Morozov [553] with FLR stabilization This has developed<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r to include sheared axial flow, considered in sections 3.5 and 7.7.<br />

Jones et al’s [554] laser-initiated, gas-embedded Z-<strong>pinch</strong> experiment with a 2D MHD<br />

model indicated a 200 eV electron temperature at a density <strong>of</strong> 10 20 cm −3 . The <strong>pinch</strong> was<br />

powered by a 600 kV Marx generator and (water) transmission line into 3 atm H 2 gas with<br />

260 kA, rising in 200 ns.<br />

In his <strong>the</strong>sis [555] Shlachter presented schlieren images showing <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> helical<br />

structures inside <strong>the</strong> cylindrical, expanding envelope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current-carrying plasma. This<br />

illustrated <strong>the</strong> dominance <strong>of</strong> m = 1inaZ-<strong>pinch</strong> with a centrally peaked current density (see<br />

section 3.2). Dangor et al [556] found that <strong>the</strong>ir laser initiated, gas-embedded <strong>pinch</strong> with<br />

a preheat current to raise <strong>the</strong> initial temperature and lower <strong>the</strong> density, did not expand but<br />

maintained a constant radius during <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main current rise. This is because <strong>the</strong><br />

current rise approximately satisfied <strong>the</strong> Haines–Hammel [103, 104] curve. After this time <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>pinch</strong> transformed into an expanding helical structure similar to that reported by Smårs [548].<br />

No disruptive break-up occurred.<br />

Scudder [109] undertook a more complete 1D steady-state calculation <strong>of</strong> radial heat loss<br />

and bremsstrahlung losses. Problems arise when <strong>the</strong> Pease–Braginskii current is approached.<br />

Indeed at 1.8 MA both <strong>the</strong> pressure and radial heat flux go to zero at <strong>the</strong> plasma boundary.<br />

(However we should note that radiative collapse is probably precluded by ion-viscous heating<br />

associated with short wavelength m = 0 MHD instabilities, section 5.8.) The Imperial<br />

College gas-embedded <strong>pinch</strong> [53] was upgraded in current to 150 kA and in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> laser<br />

interferometry to show that three phases could be distinguished. In <strong>the</strong> preheating phase<br />

<strong>the</strong> plasma column expanded from an initial radius <strong>of</strong> 100 µm with a radial velocity <strong>of</strong><br />

1.7×10 4 ms −1 driving a shock wave in <strong>the</strong> neutral gas. The Abel inversion <strong>of</strong> an interferogram<br />

gives <strong>the</strong> electron and neutral densities in figure 78. The equilibrium phase followed when<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!