You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 (2011) 093001<br />
Topical Review<br />
Figure 11. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> Ettingshausen and Nernst effects (simulations show that <strong>the</strong> self-similar<br />
solution acts as an attractor) in a 1D time-dependent simulation [113, figure 4].<br />
2.6. Nernst and Ettingshausen effects<br />
In <strong>the</strong> previous section we ignored two cross-phenomena that arise from <strong>the</strong> velocity<br />
dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collision frequency (ν ∝ v −3 ). The radial component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electron<br />
heat flux q er and <strong>the</strong> axial component <strong>of</strong> Ohm’s law in a 1D model are<br />
q er =−κ ⊥e<br />
∂T e<br />
∂r − T e<br />
e β ∧J z , (2.59)<br />
E z + v r B θ = η ⊥ J z + β ∧<br />
e<br />
∂T e<br />
∂r , (2.60)<br />
where in Braginskii’s notation [98] η ⊥ is α ⊥ /(ne) 2 . The Ettingshausen effect in equation (2.59)<br />
is an additional heat flux in <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> J × B while <strong>the</strong> Nernst term in equation (2.60)<br />
describes <strong>the</strong> convection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magnetic field by <strong>the</strong> hotter electrons associated with <strong>the</strong> heat<br />
flux, having a common coefficient β ∧ through Onsager’s relations. In <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>of</strong> e τ ei ≫ 1<br />
<strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ettingshausen term to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal conduction term is 0.32J z B θ /n e ∂T /∂r while<br />
<strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nernst term to η ⊥ J is half <strong>the</strong> inverse <strong>of</strong> this. Therefore at least one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
two effects will always be important. From [101] we note that equations (2.59) and (2.60) can<br />
be combined to give<br />
E z + v r B θ + q (<br />
erB θ<br />
5<br />
2 n ≈ η ⊥ 1 − β2 ∧ T )<br />
J<br />
eT e e 2 z ≈ η ‖ J z , (2.61)<br />
κ ⊥e η ⊥<br />
where for Z = 1, <strong>the</strong> parallel resistivity is 0.506 times <strong>the</strong> perpendicular resistivity. This<br />
clearly shows <strong>the</strong> advection <strong>of</strong> magnetic field by <strong>the</strong> heat flow with a velocity approximately<br />
q er /(5/2n e T e ). The physical meaning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ettingshausen effect can best be envisaged as an<br />
inward E z /B θ radial guiding-centre drift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hotter, relatively collisionless electrons in <strong>the</strong><br />
applied axial electric field.<br />
Chittenden and Haines [113] included <strong>the</strong>se two terms in a 1D time-dependent two<br />
temperature simulation. The main effect, shown in figures 11(a) and (b), is to remove <strong>the</strong><br />
sharp electron temperature rise and <strong>the</strong> associated skin current from <strong>the</strong> plasma edge, and to<br />
cause a slight peaking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electron temperature at r = 0, i.e. an inward heat-flow occurs.<br />
26