14.03.2014 Views

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 (2011) 093001<br />

Topical Review<br />

Figure 62. Schematic <strong>of</strong> nested wire arrays with (a) low inductance and (b) high inductance<br />

connection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inner array. Reprinted figure with permission from [325, figure 1]. Copyright<br />

2000 by <strong>the</strong> American Physical Society.<br />

by radiative cooling coupled with <strong>the</strong> kinetic pressure ρVa 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impinging precursor streams.<br />

At 215 ns, figure 61 shows <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘magnetic piston’ half-way through <strong>the</strong> implosion<br />

phase, and consists <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> axisymmetric m = 0 magnetic bubbles moving towards<br />

<strong>the</strong> axis. To <strong>the</strong> extent that it is a snowplough mechanism which requires energy loss, inelastic<br />

collisions (excitation and ionization) will lead to XUV radiation, and this is stronger in front<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger bubbles that move faster. By now <strong>the</strong> wavelength <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modulations has grown<br />

to ∼2 mm. Even with <strong>the</strong> small number <strong>of</strong> wires in this particular array <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> global<br />

correlation is very evident, and represents <strong>the</strong> same phenomenon as observed in high wire<br />

number arrays. The RT structure is similar to that simulated by Peterson et al [233]. Note that<br />

in <strong>the</strong> laboratory frame as opposed to <strong>the</strong> accelerating frame represented in <strong>the</strong>ories by gravity<br />

g, <strong>the</strong> bubbles are accelerating inward while <strong>the</strong> spike tips remain at <strong>the</strong> original wire-array<br />

radius. These spikes form <strong>the</strong> trailing mass, clearly obvious at 245 ns in figure 61, which will<br />

be considered in section 5.11. During <strong>the</strong> ablation and implosion phases, <strong>the</strong>re appears to<br />

be no evidence <strong>of</strong> kink and azimuthal displacement instabilities as proposed by Felber and<br />

Rostoker [378], Marder et al [379] and Hammer and Ryutov [380] which would probably be<br />

only slowly growing anyway. Ivanov et al [381] imaged bubble formation in 8- and 4-wire<br />

cylindrical arrays, and employed Faraday rotation techniques to measure <strong>the</strong> magnetic field<br />

strength. However such fields are unlikely to be characteristic <strong>of</strong> high wire-number implosions.<br />

5.6. Nested arrays<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> a nested, inner array has led to a significant improvement in <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> wire-array Z-<strong>pinch</strong>, and was used in high performance shots [1, 2] and in recent detailed<br />

studies [323]. It was proposed by Davis et al [60] so that, as <strong>the</strong> outer array plasma passed<br />

through <strong>the</strong> inner array, <strong>the</strong> current would switch to <strong>the</strong> inner array, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high<br />

conductivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inner wires and <strong>the</strong> inductive coupling between <strong>the</strong> two arrays. At this time<br />

<strong>the</strong> driving force behind <strong>the</strong> RT growth would also transfer to <strong>the</strong> inner array which would start<br />

to ablate and implode with initially no RT amplitude; thus at <strong>the</strong> final stagnation a much more<br />

symmetric plasma should result.<br />

Simulations by Chittenden et al [327] show three modes <strong>of</strong> operation as discussed in<br />

section 5.1 while experiments on MAGPIE [325] distinguished two modes, dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> total current induced in <strong>the</strong> inner array. Experiments were conducted with a 16 mm<br />

diameter outer array and an 8 mm diameter inner array each 16×15 µm aluminium. Figure 62<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!