14.03.2014 Views

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 (2011) 093001<br />

Topical Review<br />

Figure 51. A side-on laser shadowgram <strong>of</strong> a 16 × 15 µm Al wire array on MAGPIE at 180 ns after<br />

<strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current [65]. On <strong>the</strong> right is a similar result from a tungsten 16 × 7.5 µm array.<br />

Reprinted with permission from [65]. Copyright 2001, American Institute <strong>of</strong> Physics.<br />

between wires so that inside <strong>the</strong> current-carrying region, <strong>the</strong> closed line integral ∮ B · dl is<br />

zero. Yu [338] found that <strong>the</strong> ablation process was confined to an almost azimuthally symmetric<br />

private flux region with R m < 1, and, as described above, developed a <strong>the</strong>ory for <strong>the</strong> mass<br />

ablation rate.<br />

The mass ablation rate ṁ was very successfully modelled phenomenologically by Lebedev<br />

et al [65] in a rocket model. Assuming R m ≪ 1 and that all <strong>the</strong> current flows in a narrow<br />

shell-like region, <strong>the</strong> magnetomotive force leads to ejection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> precursor plasma with an<br />

ablation velocity V a which experimentally is found to be a constant for each material during a<br />

discharge, <strong>the</strong> rocket equation gives<br />

ṁ =− µ 0I 2<br />

4πRV a<br />

(kg m −1 s −1 ). (5.1)<br />

Knowing all <strong>the</strong> terms on <strong>the</strong> rhs from experiment ṁ can be found and integrated in time to<br />

find <strong>the</strong> mass that has been ablated up to any time t. V a is typically 10 5 ms −1 .<br />

A model developed by <strong>the</strong> Angara group [339] gave a slightly modified equation for<br />

tungsten<br />

ṁ ∗ =−0.4π I 1.8 (MA)<br />

R 0.8 (cm) (µgcm−1 ns −1 ), (5.2)<br />

where <strong>the</strong> ablation velocity is implicitly included. Cuneo et al [323] claim that both formulae<br />

agree with experiment within <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> measurement. Yu et al [338] also provide scaling<br />

laws but in terms <strong>of</strong> current and wire core radius and wire number.<br />

A side-on laser shadowgram, figure 51, clearly shows both <strong>the</strong> inward filamentary<br />

precursor flow with a wavelength <strong>of</strong> ∼0.5 mm in Al and <strong>the</strong> accumulated precursor cylinder<br />

on axis. As can be seen from <strong>the</strong> radial streak picture in figure 52, <strong>the</strong> precursor arrives on axis<br />

in MAGPIE at approximately half <strong>the</strong> time to full implosion, and is a bright emitter. Figure 53<br />

shows gated s<strong>of</strong>t x-ray images <strong>of</strong> precursor in carbon, aluminium and tungsten. In all cases<br />

<strong>the</strong> cylindrical column is straight with no sign <strong>of</strong> MHD instabilities, consistent with it carrying<br />

negligible current. The confinement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> column is because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ρVa<br />

2 kinetic pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!