14.03.2014 Views

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

A review of the dense Z-pinch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 (2011) 093001<br />

Topical Review<br />

kinetic energy per unit length just prior to stagnation is equal to <strong>the</strong> internal energy after one<br />

ion–ion collision time, with <strong>the</strong> Bennett relation equation (2.7) (pressure balance) holding, i.e.<br />

( )<br />

1 da 2<br />

2 M l (1 − f)= N ieT i<br />

dt t=t s<br />

Ɣ − 1 = µ 0I 2 (t s )<br />

8π(Ɣ − 1) , (4.24)<br />

where f is <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> kinetic energy lost by ionization and radiation at <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>of</strong><br />

stagnation. Using equation (4.20) to evaluate da/dt toge<strong>the</strong>r with equations (4.18) and (4.22)<br />

<strong>the</strong> ratio t s /t m is given by<br />

t s<br />

t m<br />

=<br />

[<br />

5<br />

2<br />

1+ 6 5 (Ɣ − 1)(1 − f) ] 1/6<br />

. (4.25)<br />

From this it can be seen that <strong>the</strong> largest value <strong>of</strong> t s /t m represents <strong>the</strong> largest fractional time<br />

delay <strong>of</strong> stagnation after peak current is (5/2) 1/6 = 1.165. For f = 0 and Ɣ = 5/3, <strong>the</strong><br />

value <strong>of</strong> t s /t m is 1.056. These results are typically within <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> experimental data. With<br />

this model <strong>the</strong> generator essentially controls <strong>the</strong> initial rate <strong>of</strong> rise in current and <strong>the</strong> early<br />

acceleration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> load. At later times <strong>the</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> load controls <strong>the</strong> current which<br />

<strong>the</strong>n falls prior to stagnation.<br />

The radius at stagnation is sensitive to <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> f as well as Ɣ. Writing Ɣ = (n +2)/n<br />

where n is <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom, equation (4.20) with (4.22) yields<br />

a s<br />

a 0<br />

= 1 −<br />

1<br />

1+ 12<br />

(4.26)<br />

(1 − f).<br />

5n<br />

For example, if f = 0.5 and n = 3,a s /a 0 = 2/7, while a s /a 0 → 0asf → 1; but if f = 0<br />

and n = 3, a s /a 0 is in contrast large at 4/9. Metallic wire-array <strong>pinch</strong>es tend to be excellent<br />

radiators, so f can be large and experimentally a s /a 0 is typically 0.1. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand<br />

deuterium gas puffs have f → 0, and <strong>the</strong> final <strong>pinch</strong> radius is a significant fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

initial radius. In order to obtain higher compression it would be necessary to dope <strong>the</strong> gas with<br />

argon, krypton or xenon in order to enhance <strong>the</strong> radiation loss, or as Potter [261] suggested,<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r raise <strong>the</strong> current in an adiabatic compression. Fur<strong>the</strong>r terms could be added to equation<br />

(4.20) leading to additional terms in equation (4.21) if a better fit to experiment is required. In<br />

experiments with wire arrays <strong>the</strong> ratio a s /a 0 is 1/20 to 1/10 typically, indicative <strong>of</strong> an efficient<br />

radiator, i.e. f is about 0.9 for n = 3. To obtain such a large and rapid conversion <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

into radiation will however probably require an additional physical mechanism as discussed<br />

in section 5.8.<br />

4.5. Early work on numerical simulations <strong>of</strong> Z-<strong>pinch</strong>es<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> earliest MHD numerical simulation was <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Z-<strong>pinch</strong> by Hain et al in 1960 [264]<br />

which was a 1D model <strong>of</strong> compressional <strong>pinch</strong>. It was conventionally called <strong>the</strong> ‘Hain-<br />

Roberts’ code. Ten years’ later Roberts and Potter published a more general account <strong>of</strong><br />

magnetohydrodynamic calculations [265]. At this time Potter [266] also published results<br />

from <strong>the</strong> 2D, two-fluid MHD code <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plasma focus (see section 7.3). The final <strong>pinch</strong> was<br />

found to be stable to short wavelength MHD modes due to damping by ion viscosity, as shown<br />

analytically earlier by Tayler [267]. Potter also found that <strong>the</strong> ions were magnetized and finite<br />

ion Larmor radius effects could be important. Viscous effects were found to be important<br />

in Z-<strong>pinch</strong> implosions simulated by Hopkins et al [268] in a 1D code especially at low line<br />

density and high ion temperature where <strong>the</strong> shock structure was broadened. Viscous effects<br />

will be important in ion heating with short wavelength instabilities in section 5.8.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!