15.03.2014 Views

Quality Account 2010/11 - James Paget University Hospitals

Quality Account 2010/11 - James Paget University Hospitals

Quality Account 2010/11 - James Paget University Hospitals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Metric 6 – Mortality and Case Note Reviews (using Global Trigger Tool)<br />

50% of harm events are thought to be avoidable (NPSA 2007). The use of triggers to identify<br />

adverse events during a manual record review has been used extensively to measure the<br />

overall level of harm in health care organisations.<br />

Local Improvement Aims:<br />

1. 100 baseline random mortality reviews to be completed by end March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

2. 40 baseline random case note reviews (harm events) to be completed by end March<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

3. 20 random mortality reviews to be completed every month from April <strong>2010</strong> onwards.<br />

4. 20 random non mortality case note reviews to be completed every month from April <strong>2010</strong><br />

onwards.<br />

Successes:<br />

• Excellent learning opportunities identified<br />

• Highlighted trends that are being incorporated into improvement projects e.g. delays in<br />

appropriate escalation of concerning patients, poor fluid management and completion of<br />

fluid charts, poor clinical record keeping<br />

Concerns:<br />

• Medical capacity to commit to review process<br />

• Overlap with existing mortality review groups<br />

• Timely administrative process to arrange reviews.<br />

Metric 7 – Medicines Management<br />

Between September 2006 and June 2009 27 deaths, 68 severe harms and 21,383 other<br />

patient safety medicines incidents were reported to the NPSA nationally.<br />

Local Improvement Aim:<br />

1. Ensure reasons for drug admissions are appropriately documented on the drug chart<br />

2. Improve pain management processes and patient outcomes<br />

3. To evidence other medicines management actions required from adverse event trends.<br />

Successes:<br />

• Multidisciplinary focus<br />

• Working on the principle of 7 key responsibilities for medicines management<br />

• Working directly with Medicines Management Action Group.<br />

Concerns:<br />

Although progress has been made there is room for further improvements. As a result<br />

medicines management will have a more targeted focus in the forthcoming year to identify<br />

ideas and innovations and how we can make more of a difference.<br />

<strong>James</strong> <strong>Paget</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> NHS Foundation Trust<br />

<strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Account</strong> <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>11</strong> Page 37 of 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!