ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 28 june 2005 at ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 28 June 2005 1 / 6 8, 10 & 12 Nola Road, Roseville Item 1 DA1333/04 17 June 2005 23. G & J Watman 45 Findlay Avenue 24. PR & SM Gill 47 Findlay Avenue 25. D Allen & A MacGibbon 64 Findlay Avenue 26. D van der Klaauw 80 Findlay Avenue 27. E Mitchell 10/8 Larkin Street 28. A Minnaard & E Thomson 2/19-21 Larkin Street 29. H & J Badger 4 Kings Avenue 30. P Ewen 6 Kings Avenue 31. A & I Inall 1 Pockley Avenue 32. T Johnson 3 Pockley Avenue 33. S Tredinnick 3 Pockley Avenue 34. AJ Borger 6 Pockley Avenue 35. MM Borger 6 Pockley Avenue 36. S Waters 7 Pockley Avenue 37. H Woon & L Harn 8 Pockley Avenue 38. K & L Sansome 9 Pockley Avenue 39. H & R Pottie 12 Pockley Avenue 40. N & S & I Ryan 16 Pockley Avenue 41. J & H Drexler 17 Pockley Avenue 42. M & A Love 3 Alexander Parade 43. F Walker 4 Alexander Parade 44. H Larcom<strong>be</strong> 6 Alexander Parade 45. K Raine 7 Alexander Parade 46. CW Raine 7 Alexander Parade 47. MA Hill (2 submissions) 10 Alexander Parade 48. ME & CA Fitjer 15 Alexander Parade 49. P & P Verdich 22 Alexander Parade 50. A Woodhouse 24 Alexander Parade 51. P Kenny 24 Alexander Parade 52. S Drull 29 Alexander Parade 53. K & A Tunnicliffe 30 Alexander Parade 54. D & D Putica 4 Corona Avenue 55. J Walker 15/175 Herring Road, Nth Ryde (5 Corona Avenue) 56. Nexus Design Pty Ltd 680 Pacific Highway (5 Corona Avenue) 57. S Miller 14 Corona Avenue 58. M & G Winnick 17 Corona Avenue The submissions raised the following issues: Cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> the development on traffic Copy <strong>of</strong> Adopted Report - 050628-OMC-PR-03137-8, 10 & 12 NOLA ROAD,-0-FLAT BUILDING COMPRISING 32 UNITS, 58 BASEMENT CAR SPACES AND LANDSCAPING(2).DOC
Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 28 June 2005 1 / 7 8, 10 & 12 Nola Road, Roseville Item 1 DA1333/04 17 June 2005 The rezoning <strong>of</strong> this site under LEP 194 <strong>to</strong> permit medium density development confers a development potential pursuant <strong>to</strong> the development standards and controls set out in LEP 194 and DCP 55. In accordance with these statu<strong>to</strong>ry planning and policy controls, sites within the Residential 2(d3) zone have the potential <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> developed for the purposes <strong>of</strong> residential flat buildings <strong>to</strong> a maximum height <strong>of</strong> five-s<strong>to</strong>reys (with a limited six s<strong>to</strong>rey element) and a footprint <strong>of</strong> 35% <strong>of</strong> the site area. The intent <strong>of</strong> rezoning for multi-unit development is <strong>to</strong> establish medium density living in proximity <strong>to</strong> transport nodes, educational and health facilities and local business centres. At Council’s <strong>meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> 25 Novem<strong>be</strong>r 2003, a report (prepared by the Direc<strong>to</strong>r – Technical Services) was considered on the traffic implications associated with the proposed rezoning <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> Roseville. The report found that high density development along the Pacific Highway associated with the Targeted Sites under SEPP 53 and the Stage 1 Residential Development Strategy associated with LEP194 will place additional pressure and demand on the Pacific Highway during peak traffic conditions. On 16 January 2004, Council advised the Department <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources (DIPNR) on the findings <strong>of</strong> the study and suggested that DIPNR assess the level <strong>of</strong> improvements required <strong>to</strong> meet the expected traffic growth from urban consolidation. LEP 194 was subsequently gazetted by DIPNR on 28 May 2004. Any cumulative impacts on residential character and density resultant from development <strong>of</strong> the subject site and similarly zoned allotments in accordance with LEP194 and DCP 55 provisions were therefore anticipated and have <strong>be</strong>en provided for in the zoning. The proposal is consistent with the objectives <strong>of</strong> SEPP 65, The Residential Flat Design Code, LEP194 and DCP 55 and will not result in a cumulative impact <strong>be</strong>yond that which is provided for under the zoning and associated controls that apply <strong>to</strong> the site. Effect on Blue Gum Creek and the riparian zone The drainage depression across Nola Road is not considered a watercourse by the Department <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources nor is it identified as such in Council’s recently approved Riparian Policy. The proposal is situated well outside <strong>of</strong> the 15 metres zone identified in Clause 7.1.6 <strong>of</strong> DCP 55. Council’s Landscape Officer is satisfied that the proposed landscape theme envisaged by the proposal will satisfy the objectives which are <strong>to</strong> enhance and reinforce the forest character <strong>of</strong> the locality. An independent study undertaken by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd in June 2005 concluded the following: The watercourse in Nola Road is not mapped as a watercourse nor requires consideration under the Ku-ring-gai Riparian Policy. The closest mapped watercourse is the tributary <strong>of</strong> Blue Gum Creek west <strong>of</strong> Kings Avenue, in<strong>to</strong> which the watercourse in Nola Road drains. It is considered likely that the DA proposal would have negligible impact on the habitat values within Nola Road given that the proposed s<strong>to</strong>rmwater, sediment and erosion controls are Copy <strong>of</strong> Adopted Report - 050628-OMC-PR-03137-8, 10 & 12 NOLA ROAD,-0-FLAT BUILDING COMPRISING 32 UNITS, 58 BASEMENT CAR SPACES AND LANDSCAPING(2).DOC
Page 1 and 2: ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE H
Page 3 and 4: PT.2 We wish to re
Page 5 and 6: To determine Development Applicatio
Page 7 and 8: GB.8 Draft Development Control Plan
Page 9 and 10: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 19: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 71 and 72:
Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
show all

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 28 june 2005 at ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?