ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 28 june 2005 at ...

Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 28 June 2005 1 / 30
8, 10 & 12 Nola Road, Roseville
Item 1
DA1333/04
17 June 2005
project 2.8 <strong>to</strong> 3 metres above natural ground level due <strong>to</strong> the 22% slope <strong>of</strong> the site. This is well
within the KPSO height and s<strong>to</strong>rey limits set down by Clause 25K. The building façade is,
however, set back 15.6 metres from the Nola Road section <strong>of</strong> the front boundary.
Setbacks <strong>to</strong> the development generally comply with the specific controls for Special Area 1 as
shown in Diagram No. 3. The building orientation displays a minor variation in order <strong>to</strong> maximise
solar access.
The upper floor will <strong>be</strong> recessed from the perimeter <strong>of</strong> the building and further set back from the
Nola Road frontage by approximately 17 metres.
The excavated driveway (within the side setback) does not comply with Clause 4.1 C-3 <strong>of</strong> DCP 55
as it allows only a 2 metre setback <strong>to</strong> No. 6 MacLaurin Parade. However, the position <strong>of</strong> the
driveway complies with the specific controls for the site as illustrated in Diagram No. 3. The site
is constrained <strong>be</strong>cause <strong>of</strong> its awkward configuration and limited road accessible street frontage
(only 18 metres <strong>to</strong> Nola Road). The driveway, in this location, is located <strong>be</strong>low the adjacent
property, does not directly affect any living areas and can <strong>be</strong> adequately screened. Conditions are
recommended <strong>to</strong> ensure that the noise attenuation measures for the au<strong>to</strong>matic gate <strong>to</strong> the car park
are installed and maintained. (Refer Conditions Nos 66 and 98a).
Part 4.4 Façade articulation:
Clause 4.4 requires that no single wall plane exceeds 81m 2 in area. Non-compliances are evident on
the north western and south eastern facades as indicated in Diagram No. 1.
96m 2 54m 2
54m 2 96m 2 South East Elevation
North West Elevation
DIAGRAM 1
These minor numerical breaches <strong>of</strong> 15m 2 (96m 2 vs. 81m 2 ) are supported for the following reasons:
• At 18 metres wide, these elevations are narrow and relative <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal length <strong>of</strong> the affected
boundaries, will not result in undue bulk and scale impacts.
Copy <strong>of</strong> Adopted Report - 050628-OMC-PR-03137-8, 10 & 12 NOLA ROAD,-0-FLAT BUILDING COMPRISING 32 UNITS, 58 BASEMENT
CAR SPACES AND LANDSCAPING(2).DOC