28.03.2014 Views

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g results, from a methods development po<strong>in</strong>t of view,<br />

are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g both approaches <strong>and</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g results. Particularly, it is<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to compare hourly <strong>in</strong>comes received by labour <strong>in</strong> each of the<br />

methods. The procedure has been tried out on a few occasions. It seems that<br />

for the preparation of meals <strong>and</strong> snacks, use of <strong>in</strong>put approach results <strong>in</strong> higher<br />

value added compared to output approach whereas the opposite is true for the<br />

production of care <strong>and</strong> cloth<strong>in</strong>g (Holloway 2002, Varjonen & Aalto 2005).<br />

In the present Satellite Account we have opted to use the <strong>in</strong>put approach.<br />

This decision was made because figures on time use were available, <strong>and</strong> also<br />

because earlier studies <strong>in</strong> 1979 <strong>and</strong> 1990 used the same method (Säntti et al.<br />

1982, Vihava<strong>in</strong>en 1995). The <strong>in</strong>put method has also been used <strong>in</strong> Germany<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hungary, where satellite accounts for <strong>2001</strong> have already been completed<br />

(Schäfer 2004 <strong>and</strong> Sik & Szép 2003).<br />

National Consumer Research Centre Statistics F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!