28.03.2014 Views

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

Household Production and Consumption in Finland 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> food: the two biggest production fields<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Household</strong> Budget Surveys the biggest consumption expenditure<br />

items <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish households are hous<strong>in</strong>g, food <strong>and</strong> transport. The <strong>Household</strong><br />

Satellite Account shows that people also put <strong>in</strong> a lot of work towards their<br />

hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> food. The value of household production is highest <strong>in</strong> the<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>cipal function of hous<strong>in</strong>g, where almost one-quarter (5 billion euros) of<br />

net value added of 22 billion euros is created through hous<strong>in</strong>g services<br />

produced by owner-occupiers. Other basic hous<strong>in</strong>g requirements, apart from<br />

the dwell<strong>in</strong>g itself, <strong>in</strong>clude furniture, household appliances <strong>and</strong> other capital<br />

goods: the value of capital consumption is almost 5 billion euros. The value of<br />

labour <strong>in</strong> the provision of meals <strong>and</strong> snacks is almost as high as <strong>in</strong> the<br />

production of hous<strong>in</strong>g services; net value added here is 16.6 billion euros. The<br />

share of capital consumption, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is considerably lower at 672<br />

million euros. At an aggregate level the other pr<strong>in</strong>cipal functions, i.e. cloth<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

care <strong>and</strong> volunteer work, are all much smaller, but the situation <strong>in</strong> families<br />

with small children is different.<br />

Labour <strong>in</strong>tensiveness is highest <strong>in</strong> care, purchases<br />

of f<strong>in</strong>al products are highest <strong>in</strong> food<br />

The structure of production varies across the different pr<strong>in</strong>cipal functions. On<br />

average, labour accounts for 74 per cent of the value of output, which is the<br />

same as <strong>in</strong> the service <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> general. The share of labour is highest <strong>in</strong> the<br />

provision of care at over 90 per cent. The value of purchased care services<br />

amounted to no more than 14 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts of the value of care produced<br />

at home, as its share is reduced by day care services organised <strong>and</strong> subsidised<br />

by the public sector. Parents’ allowances <strong>and</strong> home care allowances paid out<br />

from the public purse have been taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> calculat<strong>in</strong>g the value of<br />

care produced at home. Differences <strong>in</strong> subsidy mechanisms may complicate<br />

the task of compar<strong>in</strong>g production of care <strong>in</strong> different countries.<br />

The share of <strong>in</strong>termediate consumption, i.e. raw materials <strong>and</strong> supplies<br />

needed <strong>in</strong> production, is greatest <strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal functions of hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

food. In hous<strong>in</strong>g services, <strong>in</strong>termediate consumption goods <strong>and</strong> services consist<br />

<strong>in</strong> large part of rents, repairs <strong>and</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g. In the provision of meals,<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate consumption goods <strong>and</strong> services <strong>in</strong>clude various <strong>in</strong>gredients as<br />

well as the energy <strong>and</strong> water that are needed <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g meals. High<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate product use may be an <strong>in</strong>dication of the use of expensive or<br />

highly processed <strong>in</strong>gredients, but on the other h<strong>and</strong> it may also signal that the<br />

household does a lot of cook<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> uses less ready-to-eat snacks <strong>and</strong> prepared<br />

meals. Indeed it is necessary to look at the use of f<strong>in</strong>al consumption products<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate consumption side by side. The ratio of the two varies <strong>in</strong><br />

different types of households. Persons under 45 spend more money on f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

food products than on <strong>in</strong>termediate ones, whereas <strong>in</strong> pensioner households the<br />

opposite is true. Families with children spend roughly the same amount of<br />

money on <strong>in</strong>termediate consumption goods <strong>and</strong> services <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al consumption<br />

products.<br />

National Consumer Research Centre Statistics F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!