31.03.2014 Views

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

culated at 0.213. However, current age<br />

does not influence the behavior.<br />

Scratching <strong>of</strong> walls and furniture was<br />

more frequent when the cat was the only<br />

animal in the household (Tab. 1) and<br />

respective V-Kramer coefficient was<br />

0.156. Other animals were usually cats<br />

(73 cases) and dogs (23 cases). It can be<br />

presumed that multi-animal households<br />

are better designed to presence <strong>of</strong> animals,<br />

e.g. there are more devices to satisfy<br />

their natural needs and instincts.<br />

Another factor, influencing the behavior,<br />

was age <strong>of</strong> children in the household<br />

(V = 0.395) (Tab. 1). Scratching was significantly<br />

more frequent in households<br />

with children aged 14<strong>–</strong>18 years and 5<strong>–</strong>10<br />

years. It was found this phenomenon difficult<br />

to explain. Fewest cases <strong>of</strong> scratching<br />

<strong>–</strong> 33.3% were reported in cats<br />

born, reared and kept in one home.<br />

Over twice as many cases were reported<br />

in cats born in homes and purchased/<br />

/adopted by new families (69.2%),<br />

whereas it appeared in appr. 50% <strong>of</strong> cats<br />

adopted from strays. These differences<br />

are, however, not statistically significant,<br />

due to distinctly different numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

cats in respective groups.<br />

Distinct differences in frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

scratching behavior, depending on family<br />

size. It was highest in case <strong>of</strong> single persons,<br />

lowest in case <strong>of</strong> childless couples<br />

(Tab. 1), yet these may have been merely<br />

incidental.<br />

Other factors were not found to influence<br />

this behavior.<br />

Urination/defecation in places other<br />

than provided<br />

The second most frequent troublesome<br />

behaviour was urination/defecation in<br />

inappropriate places. Although this behaviour<br />

cannot be considered abnormal<br />

(the question remains whether it is natural<br />

in feline ethogram, it is nevertheless<br />

extremely bothersome for owners. It was<br />

reported in 64 cats, i.e. 23.8% <strong>of</strong> survey<br />

population, and also in 32.5% <strong>of</strong> all cats,<br />

showing any behavioural problems (Fig.<br />

1). Similar results were presented by<br />

Blackshaw (2003), who claims it counts<br />

1/3 <strong>of</strong> all behavioural problems in cats.<br />

These percentages are distinctly higher<br />

than reported by Voith (1981) in his<br />

survey on 376 <strong>of</strong> problematic cats, who<br />

found it in 24% <strong>of</strong> all cases. It has to be<br />

admitted that Beaver (2003) reports this<br />

problem in as many as 64.2% <strong>of</strong> 179 cats;<br />

owners regard urination/defecation in<br />

random places as major problem.<br />

As shown in Table 2, age was an important<br />

factor, influencing the behavior. It was<br />

most frequent in cats over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

(38.1%), while it was twice less frequent<br />

in young and middle-aged specimens.<br />

V-Kramer coefficient was calculated at<br />

0.179. Horzinek (2004) and Kudła (2006)<br />

suggest that cats over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age develop<br />

specific changes in their brains, similar<br />

to those found in Alzheimer patients.<br />

This disease, together with many others,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten occurring in elderly animals, may<br />

be a reason for defecation/urination in<br />

places other than provided.<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> other animals in households<br />

was found to influence this behaviour<br />

(V = 0.159). Table 2 shows that it was<br />

almost two times more frequent in homes,<br />

where other animal(s) were kept. Considering<br />

places and objects, marked with<br />

urine and/or faeces, it can be assumed<br />

that this behaviour was related to territory<br />

marking Bergman et al. (2002), suggest<br />

that when more than one cat is present<br />

in the household, frequency <strong>of</strong> marking

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!