31.03.2014 Views

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Animal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Annals</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong><br />

<strong>Sciences</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47<br />

<strong>Warsaw</strong> 2010<br />

Contents<br />

CZUB G., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., MORALES<br />

VILLAVICENCIO A. Influence <strong>of</strong> age and<br />

sex on body conformation <strong>of</strong> alpacas bred in<br />

Poland 5<br />

FISZDON K., GÓRAL K., NAROJEK J.<br />

Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic<br />

cats 11<br />

GAJEWSKA J., MICHALCZUK M., ŁUKA-<br />

SIEWICZ M., WILCZYŃSKA-CZYŻ K.,<br />

NIEMIEC J. Influence <strong>of</strong> Aminokarnifarm<br />

preparate on composition <strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora<br />

<strong>of</strong> chicken broilers 25<br />

GRODZKI H., PRZYSUCHA T., SLÓSARZ<br />

J. The influence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding<br />

<strong>of</strong> dairy cows with bulls <strong>of</strong> French breeds<br />

(Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise, Limousine)<br />

on calving course 31<br />

GRUSZCZYŃSKA J., ŁUKASIEWICZ M.<br />

Microsatellite polymorphism in the study <strong>of</strong><br />

genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> an experimental flock <strong>of</strong><br />

Ayam Cemani breed 39<br />

KALETA T., SZYMAŃSKA A. Confiscation<br />

<strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland by custom<br />

service during 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period in accordance<br />

with EU law and CITES 45<br />

ŁUKASIEWICZ-ŚMIETAŃSKA D., WIRTH-<br />

-DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., GAJEWSKA M.<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci for<br />

body composition in two growth-differentiated<br />

mouse lines 57


MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻ-<br />

NIKOWSKI R., PIETRZYKOWSKI P.,<br />

WIERZBICKI M. Fibre characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

Huacaya alpaca bred at the age <strong>of</strong> 1 year<br />

65<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻNI-<br />

KOWSKI R., PIETRZYKOWSKI P. Estimated<br />

share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya alpaca<br />

fleece 71<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., STACHELSKI<br />

P., GRODZKI H., KUCZYŃSKA B. Fat<br />

fraction components’ content in milk <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Red cows 79<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., PALIŃSKA K.,<br />

GRODZKI H. Multiple pregnancies in cattle<br />

and the frequency <strong>of</strong> their occurrence 87<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., PALIŃSKA K.,<br />

GRODZKI H. Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

on cow milk production and reproduction<br />

indices 93<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A.,<br />

STRZELEC E., POPIELARCZYK D.,<br />

GŁOWACZ K., KUCZYŃSKA B. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino ewes with<br />

rams <strong>of</strong> German Mutton Merino on growth<br />

rate and slaughter value <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

101<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A.,<br />

STRZELEC E., POPIELARCZYK D., GŁO-<br />

WACZ K. Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance<br />

in flocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino sheep bred<br />

in five companies <strong>of</strong> the Polish Agricultural<br />

Property Agency 119<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A.,<br />

STRZELEC E., POPIELARCZYK D.,<br />

GŁOWACZ K., KUCZYŃSKA B. Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon<br />

du Cher bred in Poland 127<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A., STRZE-<br />

LEC E., POPIELARCZYK D., GŁOWACZ K.<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and body<br />

conformation <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher sheep<br />

bred in Poland 135<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A.,<br />

STRZELEC E., POPIELARCZYK D., GŁO-<br />

WACZ K. Comparison <strong>of</strong> reproduction level<br />

and body conformation <strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais<br />

sheep bred in Poland 143<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A.,<br />

STRZELEC E., POPIELARCZYK D., GŁO-<br />

WACZ K., KUCZYŃSKA B. Effect <strong>of</strong> rams<br />

<strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes<br />

with Polish Merino ewes on slaughter<br />

value and meat quality <strong>of</strong> lambs 149<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., STRZELEC E., GŁO-<br />

WACZ K., POPIELARCZYK D., KUCZYŃ-<br />

SKA B. Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat<br />

carcasses designed for national market 161<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., STRZELEC E., POPIE-<br />

LARCZYK D., GŁOWACZ K., LITYŃSKI<br />

R., ROZBICKA-WIECZOREK A. Level <strong>of</strong><br />

milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat suckled<br />

by their <strong>of</strong>fspring bred under the conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> alternative production systems 177<br />

SLÓSARZ J., PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI<br />

H., MAJCHRZAK B. The influence <strong>of</strong> selected<br />

factors on Limousine and Charolaise beef<br />

calves vitality 185<br />

SLÓSARZ J., PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI<br />

H. Influence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight and condition<br />

score before calving on calving course<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows 193<br />

SLÓSARZ J., PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI<br />

H. The influence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving<br />

course in commercial crossing <strong>of</strong> black and<br />

white cows with blonde d’aquitaine bulls<br />

199<br />

STERNICKI T., GÓRAL K., OLECH W.,<br />

SZWACZKOWSKI T. The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

in three subspecies <strong>of</strong> leopard (Panthera<br />

pardus) 205<br />

WOJCIECHOWSKA I., JASIŃSKI Z., KU-<br />

BICA I. The influence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen<br />

and nitrogen concentrations on the speed <strong>of</strong><br />

waking up after CO 2 anesthesia and on the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> starting egg-laying by the artificially<br />

inseminated queen bees 213


In 2007 journal <strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricultural <strong>University</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Science (ISSN 0208-5739)<br />

was changed to name to <strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong><br />

(ISSN <strong>–</strong> 1898-8830)<br />

SERIES EDITOR<br />

Tadeusz Kaleta<br />

WARSAW UNIVERSITY<br />

OF LIFE SCIENCES PRESS<br />

e-mail: wydawnictwo@sggw.pl<br />

EDITORIAL STAFF<br />

Jadwiga Rydzewska<br />

Z<strong>of</strong>ia Orłowska<br />

ISSN 1898-8830<br />

PRINT: Agencja Reklamowo-Wydawnicza A. Grzegorczyk<br />

www.grzeg.com.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 5<strong>–</strong>9<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> age and sex on body conformation <strong>of</strong> alpacas bred<br />

in Poland<br />

GRZEGORZ CZUB, ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI,<br />

ANNA MORALES VILLAVICENCIO<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Infl uence <strong>of</strong> age and sex on body conformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> alpacas bred in Poland. In present<br />

work the attempt preliminary characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />

alpaca build from the national farm on basis selected<br />

zoometrics measurements was undertaken.<br />

On each <strong>of</strong> 49 animals the following measurements<br />

were taken: height, body length, spread and depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest, chest round, spread and length <strong>of</strong> head,<br />

length and round <strong>of</strong> foreshank. Compound measurements<br />

were analysed due to the two factors: age<br />

and sex. The age statistically affected only depth<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest. Only the value <strong>of</strong> foreshank and width<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> the head did not showed dependence<br />

either on age and sex.<br />

Key words: alpaca, zoometric measurements, body<br />

conformation, age, sex.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Llamas and alpacas are animals extensively<br />

used in South America. Except <strong>of</strong><br />

the South American continent they are<br />

bred all around the world and the main<br />

product gaining from them is a fiber<br />

(Morales Villavicencio, Niżniowski,<br />

2006). Llamas’ and alpacas’ fibre is<br />

a very valuable material <strong>of</strong> small-diameter<br />

fibers and the excellent warm-protecting<br />

properties (Morales Villavicencio, Radzik-<br />

-Rant, 2005).<br />

In Poland the alpacas breeding had started<br />

in 2004. This exotic animals perfectly<br />

settled on Polish country side. They have<br />

exceptionally low environmental requirements<br />

<strong>–</strong> they well adjust to different climatical<br />

zones, they do not require massive,<br />

expensive farm buildings. Moreover, feeding<br />

alpacas is also not expensive (Morales<br />

Villavicencio, Niżnikowski, 2008).<br />

With regard to the developing population<br />

<strong>of</strong> alpacas in Poland the attention<br />

should be turned to the correct breeding<br />

work. One element <strong>of</strong> this activities is<br />

judging the body build, which could give<br />

information about adaptive reaction <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas to the conditions <strong>of</strong> production<br />

environment. The results <strong>of</strong> zoometrical<br />

measurements are the first in Poland.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The live body measurements were taken<br />

at the alpacas farm located near Ciechanowiec,<br />

in the village Bujenka distant<br />

140 kilometers from <strong>Warsaw</strong>. The measurements<br />

were collected from the group <strong>of</strong><br />

49 animals <strong>–</strong> 23 females and 26 males.<br />

<strong>Animal</strong>s were divided for three age groups<br />

<strong>–</strong> one and a half <strong>of</strong> years, three years and<br />

at the age more than three years.<br />

The nine zoometric measurements<br />

were done on each animal: height, body<br />

length, spread and depth <strong>of</strong> chest, chest<br />

round, spreadand length <strong>of</strong> head, length


6 G. Czub, R. Niżnikowski, A. Morales Villavicencio<br />

and round foreshank. Head, foreshank<br />

and chest round were measured with tape-<br />

-measure, the other measurements were<br />

taken with zoometric staff. The locations<br />

<strong>of</strong> measurements were shown in Figure 1.<br />

The statistical calculation have been<br />

done using the SPSS v12.0 (SPSS 2004)<br />

as a model: y ijk = μ + a i + b j +e ijk ; where:<br />

y ijk <strong>–</strong> investigated traits; μ <strong>–</strong> mean; a i <strong>–</strong><br />

effect <strong>of</strong> age <strong>of</strong> alpacas (i = 1.5 years,<br />

3 years, > 3 years); b j <strong>–</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas (j = females, males); e ijk <strong>–</strong> error.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> the differences within the<br />

factor levels, the student test was applied<br />

(Ruszczyc, 1981). The results were summarized<br />

in the tables.<br />

RESULT AND DISCUSSION<br />

Table 1 presented the effects <strong>of</strong> age and<br />

sex on the body measurements in alpacas.<br />

Only length and round <strong>of</strong> foreshank as<br />

well as spread <strong>of</strong> head were not affected<br />

by both factors. Moreover the average<br />

measurements and standard deviation<br />

for the whole group <strong>of</strong> judging animals<br />

were shown in Table 1.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> age on the studied traits<br />

was presented in Table 2. It showed that<br />

the age had an influence for 6 measurements<br />

from 9 (height in withers, spread<br />

and depth <strong>of</strong> chest, body length, head<br />

length and round <strong>of</strong> chest). The measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest (spread, depth and round)<br />

turned out expressed higher values in three<br />

years old animals than in one and a half<br />

years. The height in wither was statistically<br />

higher in three years old alpacas.<br />

It is effect <strong>of</strong> natural animals growth and<br />

increasing body dimensions.<br />

The second factor taken into account<br />

was sex <strong>of</strong> alpacas. In Table 3 was shown<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> sex on live body measurements<br />

in alpacas. The results showed that a sex<br />

FIGURE 1. Places <strong>of</strong> the body measurements on alpacas: A <strong>–</strong> height in withers, B <strong>–</strong> body length,<br />

C <strong>–</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> chest, D <strong>–</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> chest, E <strong>–</strong> round <strong>of</strong> chest, F <strong>–</strong> length <strong>of</strong> head, G <strong>–</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> head,<br />

H <strong>–</strong> length <strong>of</strong> foreshank, I <strong>–</strong> round <strong>of</strong> foreshank


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> age and sex on body conformation... 7<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on live body measurements in alpacas (n = 49)<br />

Traits (cm)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

age<br />

sex<br />

X<br />

SE<br />

Height in withers X NS 81.06 1.38<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> chest XX NS 34.42 0.54<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> chest XX X 23.31 0.72<br />

Body length XX NS 78.68 1.27<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head NS NS 10.16 0.26<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head XX NS 27.77 0.44<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS NS 18.20 0.39<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS NS 11.22 0.30<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> chest XX NS 95.67 2.47<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05, XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01, NS <strong>–</strong> non significant<br />

TABLE .Effect <strong>of</strong> ae on the live body measurements in alpacas<br />

Age (years)<br />

Traits (cm)<br />

1.5 3 > 3<br />

n<br />

15 31 3<br />

LSM 76.18 81.38 85.62<br />

Height in withers<br />

SE 1.75 1.21 3.64<br />

* b c a a<br />

LSM 31.48 35.99 35.80<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> chest<br />

SE 0.68 0.47 1.41<br />

* B c a A<br />

LSM 22.08 25.43 22.43<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> chest<br />

SE 0.92 0.64 1.90<br />

* B A<br />

LSM 74.41 83.42 78.22<br />

Body length<br />

SE 1.60 1.11 3.33<br />

* B A<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head<br />

LSM 9.96 10.41 10.12<br />

SE 0.33 0.23 0.69<br />

LSM 26.73 28.99 27.59<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head<br />

SE 0.56 0.39 1.16<br />

* B A<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank<br />

LSM 17.95 19.08 17.58<br />

SE 0.50 0.34 1.03<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank<br />

LSM 10.64 11.02 12.00<br />

SE 0.38 0.26 0.78<br />

LSM 87.12 102.58 97.32<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> chest<br />

SE 3.13 2.17 6.49<br />

* B A<br />

* <strong>–</strong> statistical significance at: a,b,c <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; A,B,C <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01


8 G. Czub, R. Niżnikowski, A. Morales Villavicencio<br />

TABLE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on the live body measurements<br />

in alpacas<br />

Sex<br />

Traits (cm)<br />

female male<br />

n 23 26<br />

Height LSM 79.81 83.32<br />

in withers SE 1.75 1.53<br />

Depth LSM 34.85 34.00<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest SE 0.68 0.59<br />

Spread LSM 24.43 x 22.20<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest SE 0.92 0.80<br />

Body length<br />

LSM 77.92 79.44<br />

SE 1.60 1.40<br />

Spread LSM 10.35 9.98<br />

<strong>of</strong> head SE 0.33 0.29<br />

Length LSM 27.99 27.54<br />

<strong>of</strong> head SE 0.56 0.49<br />

Length LSM 17.84 18.57<br />

<strong>of</strong> foreshank SE 0.50 0.43<br />

Round LSM 10.88 11.56<br />

<strong>of</strong> foreshank SE 0.38 0.33<br />

Round LSM 96.35 94.99<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest SE 3.12 2.73<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05<br />

significantly affected only the spread<br />

<strong>of</strong> chest. The average spread <strong>of</strong> chest in<br />

females was slightly higher than in males.<br />

The zoometric measurements on live<br />

animals is the one <strong>of</strong> many ways <strong>of</strong><br />

monitoring the population. To carry out<br />

similar measurements in other countries<br />

and in different environmental conditions<br />

would be a good scientific perspective<br />

and obtaining such data would allow<br />

to characterize the general morphology<br />

<strong>of</strong> alpacas. The overall condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animal and the body conformation show<br />

individual adaptation to the environment.<br />

Measurements on live animals kept in<br />

different climatic zones and comparing<br />

the values <strong>of</strong> such measurements could<br />

help to determine the adaptation level <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas to different climatic conditions,<br />

which requires detailed researches in this<br />

field.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results allowed to conclude: Based<br />

on the analysis <strong>of</strong> measurements were:<br />

1. Most <strong>of</strong> the investigated traits were<br />

affected by the age <strong>of</strong> animals. Sex<br />

affected only the spread <strong>of</strong> chest.<br />

2. Age and sex <strong>of</strong> alpacas did not affected<br />

the length and round <strong>of</strong> foreshank<br />

and the spread <strong>of</strong> the head.<br />

3. Analogous live body measurements<br />

would be beneficial to perform on<br />

other alpacas’ populations kept under<br />

different geographical areas. Then,<br />

the comparison <strong>of</strong> the Polish alpacas<br />

to the others is planned under future<br />

experiments.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., RADZIK-<br />

RANT A., 2005: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> selected<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> hair from Llamas (Lama glama)<br />

kept at <strong>Warsaw</strong> ZOO. <strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricultural<br />

<strong>University</strong>, <strong>Animal</strong> Science, 43:<br />

35<strong>–</strong>39.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻNIKOW-<br />

SKI R., 2006: Populacja wielbłądowatych południowoamerykańskich<br />

na świecie. Przegląd<br />

Hodowlany, 6: 16<strong>–</strong>19.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻNIKOW-<br />

SKI R., 2008: Lamy i alpaki alternatywą w produkcji<br />

zwierzęcej. Wieś Jutra, 11: 29<strong>–</strong>31.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981. Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

SPSS <strong>–</strong> Statistical Product and Service Solutions:<br />

Base version 12.0 for Windows, inc. USA,<br />

2004.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ wieku i płci na budowę<br />

ciała alpak utrzymywanych w Polsce. Alpaki<br />

są zwierzętami wszechstronnie użytkowany-


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> age and sex on body conformation... 9<br />

mi w krajach Ameryki Południowej. Głównym<br />

produktem pozyskiwanym od tych zwierząt jest<br />

jednak włókno, dla którego alpaki utrzymywane<br />

są na całym świecie. Hodowlę alpak rozpoczęto<br />

w Polsce w 2004 roku. Alpaki świetnie przystosowały<br />

się do krajowych warunków klimatycznych.<br />

Pogłowie tych zwierząt nie jest obecnie duże (ok.<br />

500<strong>–</strong>600 szt.), ale ich liczba stale się powiększa.<br />

Mając na uwadze ten fakt należy zwiększać wysiłki<br />

związane z prowadzeniem pracy hodowlanej.<br />

Jednym z jej elementów jest kontrolowanie<br />

rozwoju zwierząt i ocena budowy ciała. W związku<br />

z brakiem podobnych badań w naszym kraju,<br />

podjęto próbę wstępnej charakterystyki budowy<br />

alpaki z hodowli krajowej na podstawie wybranych<br />

pomiarów zoometrycznych.<br />

Na każdym z 49 zwierząt wykonano następujące<br />

pomiary: wysokość w kłębie, skośna długość<br />

tułowia, szerokość i głębokość klatki piersiowej,<br />

obwód klatki piersiowej, szerokość i długość głowy,<br />

długość i obwód nadpęcia. Badano związek wartości<br />

pomiarów z 2 czynnikami: płcią i wiekiem.<br />

Stwierdzono zależność wymiarów ciała alpaki od<br />

wieku zwierzęcia. Czynnik płci wpłynął jedynie na<br />

szerokość klatki piersiowej. Jedynie wartości pomiarów<br />

nadpęcia i szerokości głowy nie wykazały<br />

zależności zarówno od wieku jak i płci.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 11<strong>–</strong>24<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats<br />

KATARZYNA FISZDON, KATARZYNA GÓRAL, JUSTYNA NAROJEK<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders<br />

in domestic cats. 269 cat owners was aimed at<br />

collecting information on abnormal/undesired<br />

behaviours <strong>of</strong> their pets. Based on this information,<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> sex, breed, age, origin, age at<br />

purchase/adoption and living conditions (number<br />

<strong>of</strong> cats, presence <strong>of</strong> other animals and/or children)<br />

on respective behaviours was studied. Results were<br />

analyzed with Chi 2 test and V-Kramer coefficient<br />

was calculated to establish level <strong>of</strong> correlations<br />

between different features. Abnormal/undesirable<br />

behaviours were reported in 73% <strong>of</strong> cats. 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

them would scratch walls and furniture, and this<br />

behaviour was influenced by age at purchase/adoption,<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> other animals, and age <strong>of</strong> children<br />

in the family. 28.6% <strong>of</strong> cats showed urination/defecation<br />

in random places and this was influenced<br />

by age (more common in older animals), reproductive<br />

status (more frequent in neutered animals,<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> their sex) and presence <strong>of</strong> other<br />

animals. Aggression towards other cats occurred in<br />

20% <strong>of</strong> animals, most <strong>of</strong> them over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

and it was also far more common in cats allowed<br />

to spent at least some time outdoor. Aggression<br />

towards animals <strong>of</strong> other species was found in 10%<br />

<strong>of</strong> cats, significantly more <strong>of</strong>ten in females and<br />

cats <strong>of</strong> both sexes roaming free. Other abnormal/<br />

/undesirable behaviours were: destruction (8%),<br />

aggression towards people (significantly more<br />

frequent in households with children), excessive<br />

grooming (2.6%) and autoaggression (1.9%).<br />

Key words: behavior, cat, disorders.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Several behavioural abnormalities in<br />

domestic animals may lead to dangerous,<br />

or at least unpleasant consequences, both<br />

to animals involved and to people. They<br />

are also frequent reason for parting with<br />

the animal in question. According to<br />

the US studies L<strong>of</strong>flin (2009) animals<br />

presenting behavioural abnormalities are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten abandoned by their owners or end<br />

up in shelters and ponds, where 4 million<br />

cats and 2 million dogs are euthanized<br />

every year. There are many factors, contributing<br />

to behavioural abnormalities.<br />

As shown in the American survey on<br />

domestic dogs, origin and breeding, age<br />

at purchase/adoption time, and diseases<br />

during kittenhood all contribute to future<br />

aggression, fear and susceptibility to<br />

stress.<br />

Cats are one <strong>of</strong> the most popular<br />

domestic animals, both in Europe and in<br />

the USA. Contrary to dogs, their behaviour<br />

has not changed much in result <strong>of</strong><br />

domestication. Domestic cats <strong>of</strong>ten breed<br />

with the feral ones, and some progeny <strong>of</strong><br />

feral cats find its way into households. In<br />

result, some genes, determining afiliative<br />

behaviours and influencing socialization,<br />

may be lost in domestic population. In<br />

Poland, random bred and feral cats outnumber<br />

dramatically those <strong>of</strong> controlled<br />

breeding; moreover, the vast majority<br />

grow with minimal, if any contact with<br />

humans, and without any socialization.<br />

In this study frequency <strong>of</strong> abnormal<br />

behaviours in random population <strong>of</strong>


12 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

domestic cats, and contributing factors<br />

was analyzed.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Questionnaires were collected from the<br />

random group <strong>of</strong> owners <strong>of</strong> 269 cats.<br />

They were to answer several questions<br />

concerning age, origin and breed <strong>of</strong><br />

animal in question, its maintenance conditions,<br />

as well as presence <strong>of</strong> abnormal<br />

behaviors. Those included defecation/<br />

urination in places other than provided<br />

for these purposes, aggression towards<br />

other cats, other animals and humans,<br />

excessive self-grooming, autoaggressive<br />

and destructive behaviors.<br />

Group consisted <strong>of</strong> 135 toms, 91 <strong>of</strong><br />

them castrated, and 134 queens, 78 <strong>of</strong><br />

them spayed. They were attributed to<br />

three age groups: up to 2 years (57 cats),<br />

from 2 to 8 years (124) and over 8 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age (81). In seven cases owners were<br />

unable to specify the age.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> cats, i.e. 209, were<br />

random bred, 43 pure bred (as numbers in<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the breeds were low, they were all<br />

classified in one group), 17 had one pure<br />

bred parent, and they were classified as<br />

Mix.<br />

143 cats were <strong>of</strong> completely unknown<br />

background and collected from streets,<br />

farms etc. (2 <strong>of</strong> them were actually<br />

adopted from animal shelters), 28 came<br />

from breeders, 15 were born and reared<br />

in owners homes, and 83 were born in<br />

homes and placed with other families.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> age at purchase/<br />

/adoption time (in one case it could not<br />

be determined), presence <strong>of</strong> other animals<br />

in the household, and number <strong>of</strong> family<br />

members were determine. Data were<br />

analyzed with Chi 2 test and level <strong>of</strong> correlations<br />

between specific features presented<br />

as V-Kramer coefficient.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Abnormal behaviours were presented by<br />

197 individuals i.e. 73% <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

This percentage is higher than reported<br />

either in Germany by Heidenberger (1997)<br />

(54.7%) or by Voith in USA (1981) (47%).<br />

The most common behaviour reported<br />

was scratching furniture and walls<br />

(Figure 1). This behaviour, although highly<br />

undesirable for owners, is, however, utterly<br />

natural, and can be easily prevented by<br />

providing special devices. The next most<br />

frequent ones were uncontrolled urina-<br />

Scratching <strong>of</strong> furniture and<br />

walls<br />

Urination/defecation in places<br />

other than provided<br />

Aggression towards other cats<br />

Aggression towards other<br />

animals<br />

Destructive behaviours<br />

Aggression towards humans<br />

Excessive self-grooming.<br />

Autoaggres sion<br />

FIGURE 1. Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

behavioural disorders


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 13<br />

tion/defecation and aggression toward<br />

other cats, respectively.<br />

Scratching <strong>of</strong> furniture and walls<br />

As stated earlier, scratching furniture and<br />

walls was reported as the most frequent<br />

behaviour reported <strong>–</strong> it was presented by<br />

140 specimens, i.e. 52%. This result is<br />

distinctly and significantly higher than<br />

reported by Heidenberger (1997) in 15.2%<br />

<strong>of</strong> all cats she included in her study. Such<br />

striking difference is difficult to explain.<br />

However, such factors as country (Germany)<br />

and time (13 years ago) should be<br />

probably taken into consideration.<br />

This behaviour was not influenced<br />

either by sex or by age, and in each sex<br />

and age group was reported in appr. 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals.<br />

Contrary, age at purchase/adoption and<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> other animals in the household<br />

had significant influence upon this<br />

behaviour (Tab. 1). Specifically, the<br />

younger was the animal at that time, the<br />

more frequent was the presence <strong>of</strong> behavior,<br />

and V-Kramer coefficient was cal-<br />

TABLE 1. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on scratching <strong>of</strong> furniture and walls<br />

Age at time <strong>of</strong> purchase/adoption*<br />

Scratching <strong>of</strong> furniture and walls<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

Kitten up to 2 months 85 61.2 54 38.8 139<br />

From 2 months up to 2 years 50 45.9 59 54.1 109<br />

Over 2 years 5 25.0 15 75.0 20<br />

Total 140 52.2 246 47.8 268<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> other animals*<br />

Yes 73 45.6 87 54.4 160<br />

No 67 61.5 42 38.5 109<br />

Total 140 52.0 129 48.0 269<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> children (years)*<br />

0<strong>–</strong>4 4 28.6 10 71.4 14<br />

5<strong>–</strong>10 7 63.6 4 36.4 11<br />

11<strong>–</strong>13 6 37.5 10 62.5 16<br />

14<strong>–</strong>18 21 75.0 7 25.0 28<br />

Total 38 55.0 31 45.0 69<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 15 53.6 13 46.4 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 5 33.3 10 66.7 15<br />

Born in other household 50 69.2 33 39.8 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 70 48.9 73 51.1 143<br />

Total 140 52.0 129 48.0 269<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> persons in household<br />

Single person 15 68.2 7 31.8 22<br />

Couple 36 43.9 46 56.1 82<br />

Couple with child 25 51.0 24 49.0 49<br />

Couple with children 19 65.5 10 34.5 29<br />

Several adults 44 51.2 42 48.8 86<br />

Total 139 51.9 129 48.1 268<br />

* <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05


14 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

culated at 0.213. However, current age<br />

does not influence the behavior.<br />

Scratching <strong>of</strong> walls and furniture was<br />

more frequent when the cat was the only<br />

animal in the household (Tab. 1) and<br />

respective V-Kramer coefficient was<br />

0.156. Other animals were usually cats<br />

(73 cases) and dogs (23 cases). It can be<br />

presumed that multi-animal households<br />

are better designed to presence <strong>of</strong> animals,<br />

e.g. there are more devices to satisfy<br />

their natural needs and instincts.<br />

Another factor, influencing the behavior,<br />

was age <strong>of</strong> children in the household<br />

(V = 0.395) (Tab. 1). Scratching was significantly<br />

more frequent in households<br />

with children aged 14<strong>–</strong>18 years and 5<strong>–</strong>10<br />

years. It was found this phenomenon difficult<br />

to explain. Fewest cases <strong>of</strong> scratching<br />

<strong>–</strong> 33.3% were reported in cats<br />

born, reared and kept in one home.<br />

Over twice as many cases were reported<br />

in cats born in homes and purchased/<br />

/adopted by new families (69.2%),<br />

whereas it appeared in appr. 50% <strong>of</strong> cats<br />

adopted from strays. These differences<br />

are, however, not statistically significant,<br />

due to distinctly different numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

cats in respective groups.<br />

Distinct differences in frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

scratching behavior, depending on family<br />

size. It was highest in case <strong>of</strong> single persons,<br />

lowest in case <strong>of</strong> childless couples<br />

(Tab. 1), yet these may have been merely<br />

incidental.<br />

Other factors were not found to influence<br />

this behavior.<br />

Urination/defecation in places other<br />

than provided<br />

The second most frequent troublesome<br />

behaviour was urination/defecation in<br />

inappropriate places. Although this behaviour<br />

cannot be considered abnormal<br />

(the question remains whether it is natural<br />

in feline ethogram, it is nevertheless<br />

extremely bothersome for owners. It was<br />

reported in 64 cats, i.e. 23.8% <strong>of</strong> survey<br />

population, and also in 32.5% <strong>of</strong> all cats,<br />

showing any behavioural problems (Fig.<br />

1). Similar results were presented by<br />

Blackshaw (2003), who claims it counts<br />

1/3 <strong>of</strong> all behavioural problems in cats.<br />

These percentages are distinctly higher<br />

than reported by Voith (1981) in his<br />

survey on 376 <strong>of</strong> problematic cats, who<br />

found it in 24% <strong>of</strong> all cases. It has to be<br />

admitted that Beaver (2003) reports this<br />

problem in as many as 64.2% <strong>of</strong> 179 cats;<br />

owners regard urination/defecation in<br />

random places as major problem.<br />

As shown in Table 2, age was an important<br />

factor, influencing the behavior. It was<br />

most frequent in cats over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

(38.1%), while it was twice less frequent<br />

in young and middle-aged specimens.<br />

V-Kramer coefficient was calculated at<br />

0.179. Horzinek (2004) and Kudła (2006)<br />

suggest that cats over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age develop<br />

specific changes in their brains, similar<br />

to those found in Alzheimer patients.<br />

This disease, together with many others,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten occurring in elderly animals, may<br />

be a reason for defecation/urination in<br />

places other than provided.<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> other animals in households<br />

was found to influence this behaviour<br />

(V = 0.159). Table 2 shows that it was<br />

almost two times more frequent in homes,<br />

where other animal(s) were kept. Considering<br />

places and objects, marked with<br />

urine and/or faeces, it can be assumed<br />

that this behaviour was related to territory<br />

marking Bergman et al. (2002), suggest<br />

that when more than one cat is present<br />

in the household, frequency <strong>of</strong> marking


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 15<br />

TABLE 2. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on urination/defecation in places other than provided<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> cat*<br />

Urination/defecation in places other than provided<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

0<strong>–</strong>2 11 19.2 46 80.8 57<br />

3<strong>–</strong>8 29 20.4 113 79.6 142<br />

> 8 24 38.1 39 61.9 63<br />

Total 64 24.4 198 75.6 262<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> other animals*<br />

Yes 47 29.4 113 70.6 160<br />

No 17 15.6 92 84.4 109<br />

Total 64 23.8 205 76.2 269<br />

Sex*<br />

Male 6 13.6 38 86.4 44<br />

Female 9 16.0 47 84.0 56<br />

Castrated male 26 28.6 65 71.4 91<br />

Spayed female 23 29.5 55 70.5 78<br />

Total 64 23.8 205 76.2 269<br />

Breed<br />

European 52 24.9 157 75.1 209<br />

Mix 6 35.3 11 64.7 17<br />

Purebred 6 14.0 37 86.0 43<br />

Total 64 23.8 205 76.2 269<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 5 17.8 23 82.2 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 1 6.7 14 93.3 15<br />

Born in other household 21 25.3 62 74.7 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown 37 25.9 106 74.1 143<br />

origin<br />

Total 64 23.8 205 76.2 269<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> persons in household<br />

Single person 5 22.7 17 77.3 22<br />

Couple 14 17.1 68 82.9 82<br />

Couple with child 17 34.7 32 65.3 49<br />

Couple with children 8 27.6 21 72.4 29<br />

Several adults 20 23.3 66 76.7 86<br />

Total 64 23.9 204 76.1 268<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> children (years)<br />

0<strong>–</strong>4 6 42.9 8 57.1 14<br />

5<strong>–</strong>10 2 18.2 9 81.8 11<br />

11<strong>–</strong>13 3 18.8 13 81.2 16<br />

14<strong>–</strong>18 12 42.9 16 57.1 28<br />

Total 23 33.3 46 66.7 69<br />

* <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05


16 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

increases. According to Horwitz (1997),<br />

among 100 cats that presented this kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> problems, 65% were kept in multianimal<br />

household, 50 <strong>of</strong> them (77%)<br />

lived with another cat, and 23% with<br />

more animals. Also Seksel (2000) claims<br />

that marking increases proportionally to<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cats that live in one place.<br />

As far as sex is concerned, it is worthy<br />

to note that frequency <strong>of</strong> marking increases<br />

twice in neutered animals, both males<br />

and females (Tab. 2). The difference<br />

between neutered and intact animals was<br />

statistically significant. Nevertheless,<br />

Marder (1991) and Patronek et al. (1996)<br />

concluded opposite <strong>–</strong> marking was more<br />

frequent in intact animals. Seksel (2000)<br />

claims that this behaviour appear mainly<br />

in males, and castration does not have<br />

any influence on it. In our survey marking<br />

was not separated as such from urination/defecation.<br />

These behaviours were the least frequent<br />

in purebred cats and the most frequent<br />

in mix bred ones, i.e. those having<br />

one purebred parent, yet differences were<br />

not statistically significant. They were<br />

also relatively rare in cats that were born<br />

and reared in their permanent homes,<br />

whereas they were <strong>of</strong>ten reported with<br />

adopted cats (Tab. 2). Again, these differences<br />

were not statistically significant,<br />

most probably due to obviously different<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> animals in each group.<br />

Additionally, age <strong>of</strong> children seems to<br />

influence the behaviour <strong>–</strong> it occurs with<br />

higher frequency in homes with children<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0<strong>–</strong>4 and 14<strong>–</strong>18 years <strong>of</strong> age. Even though<br />

differences were seemingly obvious, they<br />

could not be statistically confirmed.<br />

Aggression towards other cats<br />

Among all abnormal or unacceptable behaviours<br />

the next common one is aggression<br />

towards other cats. It was reported in<br />

53 specimens, i.e. almost 20% <strong>of</strong> all cats<br />

included in the survey. Studies in <strong>Animal</strong><br />

Behaviour Clinic, Cornell <strong>University</strong>,<br />

show that in 13.5% <strong>of</strong> homes with more<br />

than one cat cases <strong>of</strong> aggression were<br />

observed. Studies on aggression caused<br />

by introduction <strong>of</strong> another cat into household<br />

(Levine et al., 2005) showed that its<br />

cases appeared in almost 50% <strong>of</strong> such<br />

households. Borchelt and Voith (1996)<br />

report cat fights with frequency at least<br />

once a month in 44% <strong>of</strong> homes.<br />

In the study was found that age <strong>of</strong><br />

cats and level <strong>of</strong> aggression were correlated<br />

(V = 0.242). Aggression was most<br />

common among old cats (over 8 years)<br />

and more than twice less common in<br />

younger ones (Tab. 3). Beaver (2003)<br />

claims that elderly cats are more likely to<br />

show aggressions towards kitten, while<br />

Levine et al. (2005) did not find any relation<br />

between age <strong>of</strong> cats and aggression.<br />

Another important factor were living<br />

conditions (V = 0.153) (Tab. 3). Aggression<br />

was most frequent among cats that<br />

were allowed out, whereas it was least<br />

frequent among those kept permanently<br />

inside. Similar result was reported by<br />

Levine et al. (2005) <strong>–</strong> in his study aggression<br />

cases were 3<strong>–</strong>4 times more common<br />

in the first group.<br />

Aggression towards other cats was<br />

also most common in spayed females<br />

(30%) and lest common in intact males<br />

(only 11.4%) (Tab. 3). This difference<br />

was, however, statistically insignificant.<br />

Other studies report different results.<br />

Landsberg et al. (2003) claims that highest<br />

level <strong>of</strong> aggression can be observed<br />

among males. Lindell et al. (1997) report<br />

that males tend to be most aggressive, and<br />

their aggression is directed both to other<br />

males as well as to females. According to


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 17<br />

TABLE 3. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on aggression towards other cats<br />

Age*<br />

Aggression towards other cats<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

0<strong>–</strong>2 8 14.0 49 86.0 57<br />

3<strong>–</strong>8 20 14.1 122 85.9 142<br />

> 8 23 36.5 40 63.5 63<br />

Total 51 19.5 211 80.5 262<br />

Living conditions*<br />

Exclusively indoor 20 14.3 120 85.7 140<br />

Limited access outdoor 24 27.9 62 72.1 86<br />

Unlimited 9 20.9 34 79.1 43<br />

Total 53 19.7 216 80.3 269<br />

Sex<br />

Male 5 11.4 39 88.6 44<br />

Female 9 16.1 47 83.9 56<br />

Castrated male 16 17.6 75 82.4 91<br />

Spayed female 23 29.5 55 70.5 78<br />

Total 53 19.7 216 80.3 269<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 7 25.0 21 75.0 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 0 0.0 15 100 15<br />

Born in other household 18 21.7 65 78.3 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 28 19.6 115 80.4 143<br />

Total 53 19.7 216 80.3 269<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> children<br />

0<strong>–</strong>4 4 28.6 10 71.4 14<br />

5<strong>–</strong>10 2 18.2 9 81.8 11<br />

11<strong>–</strong>13 2 12.5 14 87.5 16<br />

14<strong>–</strong>18 8 28.6 20 71.4 28<br />

Total 16 23.2 53 76.8 69<br />

* <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05<br />

Hart and Cooper (1984), males are more<br />

frequently aggressive towards females<br />

than other males.<br />

As show in Table 3, aggression was not<br />

reported among cats born, reared and kept<br />

in one household <strong>–</strong> it may be presumed<br />

that they form family relations within the<br />

group. Cats born in catteries were generally<br />

most aggressive. These differences<br />

weren’t statistically significant.<br />

Same as with urination/defecation,<br />

aggression was more common when children<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0<strong>–</strong>4 years and 14<strong>–</strong>18 years were<br />

present; again these differences were not<br />

statistically significant.<br />

Aggression towards other animals<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> aggression was reported in<br />

25 individuals, i.e. less than 10%.<br />

Although the number <strong>of</strong> reported cases<br />

was low, it was nevertheless possible to<br />

establish relation between sex and living<br />

conditions (Tab. 4) and aggression towards<br />

other animals. It was most frequent in


18 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

TABLE 4. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on aggression towards other animals<br />

Sex*<br />

Aggression towards other animals<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

Male 2 4.5 42 95.5 44<br />

Female 9 16.1 47 83.9 56<br />

Castrated male 2 2.2 89 97.8 91<br />

Spayed female 12 15.4 66 84.6 78<br />

Total 25 9.3 244 90.7 269<br />

Living conditions*<br />

Exclusively indoor 6 4.3 134 95.7 140<br />

Limited access outdoor 11 12.8 75 87.2 86<br />

Unlimited 8 18.6 35 81.4 43<br />

Total 25 9.3 244 90.7 269<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

0<strong>–</strong>2 2 3.5 55 96.5 57<br />

3<strong>–</strong>8 14 9.8 128 90.2 142<br />

> 8 9 14.3 54 85.7 63<br />

Total 25 9.5 237 90.5 262<br />

Breed<br />

European 21 10.0 188 90.0 209<br />

Mix 1 5.9 16 94.1 17<br />

Pure bred 3 7.0 40 93.0 43<br />

Total 25 9.3 244 90.7 269<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 3 10.7 25 89.3 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 3 20.0 12 80.0 15<br />

Born in other household 8 9.6 75 90.4 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 11 7.7 132 92.3 143<br />

Total 25 9.3 244 90.7 269<br />

Age at time <strong>of</strong> purchase/adoption<br />

Kitten up to 2 months 17 12.2 122 87.8 139<br />

From 2 months up to 2 years 7 6.4 102 93.6 109<br />

Over 2 years 1 5.0 19 95.0 20<br />

Total 25 9.3 243 90.7 268<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> children<br />

0 16 8.4 174 91.6 190<br />

1 4 8.2 45 91.8 49<br />

2 2 10.0 18 90.0 20<br />

3 1 25.0 3 75.0 4<br />

Total 23 8.7 240 91.3 263<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> children<br />

0<strong>–</strong>4 1 7.1 13 92.9 14<br />

5<strong>–</strong>10 0 0.0 11 100 11<br />

11<strong>–</strong>13 0 0.0 16 100 16<br />

14<strong>–</strong>18 5 17.8 23 82.2 28<br />

Total 6 8.7 63 91.3 69


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 19<br />

females, either intact or spayed, than<br />

in males (V = 0.221). Also living conditions<br />

were <strong>of</strong> distinct influence (V =<br />

= 0.191). Cats kept permanently indoor<br />

were less likely to attack other animals,<br />

yet the more they were allowed out, the<br />

more common were aggression cases. It<br />

can be assumed that cats roaming at large<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten gain bad experiences in contacts<br />

with other animals, mostly dogs, and in<br />

result aggression towards them develops.<br />

Statistical analysis did not confirm relation<br />

between age and aggression towards<br />

other animals. Nevertheless, as shown in<br />

Table 4, aggression was less common in<br />

young cats <strong>–</strong> only 2 cases in cats under<br />

2 years <strong>of</strong> age, and more common in cats<br />

over 8 years. No influence <strong>of</strong> origin was<br />

confirmed statistically, yet aggression<br />

towards other animals was two times<br />

more common in cats born, reared and<br />

living in one, permanent home (20%),<br />

than in other cats.<br />

This aggression was dramatically common<br />

in cats, purchased/adopted before<br />

they were 2 months old, whereas it was<br />

twice less common in those purchased/<br />

/adopted in older age. This difference,<br />

albeit striking, could not be statistically<br />

confirmed.<br />

Other factors, including presence <strong>of</strong><br />

other animals in households, did not significantly<br />

influence aggression towards<br />

other pets.<br />

Destructive behaviors<br />

Destructive behaviours were reported<br />

in 22 cats, i.e. 8% <strong>of</strong> total population<br />

studied. No particular influence could be<br />

statistically confirmed. However, some<br />

differences were found both in frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> the behaviours and their percentage in<br />

different groups (Tab. 5).<br />

Destructive behaviours were least<br />

frequent in intact males (Tab. 5). Also<br />

castrated males were less destructive than<br />

TABLE 5. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on destructive behaviors<br />

Sex*<br />

Destructive behavior<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

Male 2 4.5 42 95.5 44<br />

Female 5 8.9 51 91.1 56<br />

Castrated male 7 7.7 84 92.3 91<br />

Spayed female 8 10.3 70 89.7 78<br />

Total 22 8.2 247 91.8 269<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

0<strong>–</strong>2 7 12.3 50 87.7 57<br />

3<strong>–</strong>8 11 7.7 131 92.3 142<br />

> 8 4 6.3 59 93.7 63<br />

Total 22 8.4 240 91.6 262<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 2 7.1 26 92.9 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 2 13.3 13 86.7 15<br />

Born in other household 9 10.8 74 89.2 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 9 6.2 134 93.7 143<br />

Total 22 8.2 247 91.8 269


20 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

females, both intact and spayed. Older<br />

cats over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age displayed such<br />

behaviours twice less <strong>of</strong>ten than young<br />

cats under 2 years <strong>of</strong> age. It is most probably<br />

related to generally higher activity<br />

level, eagerness to play and explore. In<br />

result incidental damage to objects and<br />

furniture can occur during play. Additionally,<br />

we found destructive behaviours to<br />

appear two times more frequently in cats<br />

born and reared in their current home<br />

than in those purchased from breeders<br />

or adopted and <strong>of</strong> unknown background.<br />

This result is both interesting and difficult<br />

to explain.<br />

Aggression towards humans<br />

Aggression towards humans was reported<br />

in 18 surveyed cats, i.e. in only 6.7%.<br />

Results obtained in other studies vary<br />

TABLE 6. Influence <strong>of</strong> studied factors on aggression towards humans<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> children*<br />

Aggression towards humans<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

0 13 6.8 177 93.2 190<br />

1 1 2.0 48 98.0 49<br />

2 1 5.0 19 95.0 20<br />

3 2 5.0 2 50.0 4<br />

Total 17 6.5 246 93.5 263<br />

Sex<br />

Male 1 2.3 43 97.7 44<br />

Female 5 8.9 51 91.1 56<br />

Castrated male 6 6.6 85 93.4 91<br />

Spayed female 6 7.7 72 92.3 78<br />

Total 18 6.7 251 93.3 269<br />

Living conditions<br />

Exclusively indoor 13 9.3 127 90.7 140<br />

Limited access outdoor 3 3.5 83 96.5 86<br />

Unlimited 2 4.6 41 95.4 43<br />

Total 18 6.7 251 93.3 269<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 0 0.0 28 100 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 1 6.7 14 93.3 15<br />

Born in other household 8 9.6 75 90.4 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 9 6.3 134 93.7 143<br />

Total 18 6.7 251 93.3 269<br />

Age at time <strong>of</strong> purchase/adoption*<br />

Kitten up to 2 months 14 10.0 125 90.0 139<br />

From 2 months up to 2 years 4 3.7 105 96.3 109<br />

Over 2 years 0 0.0 20 100 20<br />

Total 18 6.7 250 93.3 268<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> other animals*<br />

Yes 7 4.4 153 95.6 160<br />

No 11 10.1 98 89.9 109<br />

Total 18 6.7 251 93.3 269


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 21<br />

from 23 to 39% total aggression cases, at<br />

least half <strong>of</strong> them can be considered aggression<br />

towards people (Kudła, 2008).<br />

Although our results were numerically<br />

low, it was possible to determine relation<br />

between this type <strong>of</strong> aggression and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children in households (Tab. 6).<br />

Appr. 50% <strong>of</strong> cats living in households<br />

with three children displayed aggression<br />

towards humans, and this result was statistically<br />

significant (V = 0.233). However,<br />

the group was too small to draw more<br />

general conclusions. Remaining cases<br />

were reported both in homes with no<br />

children (13 cases <strong>–</strong> 6.8%) and occasionally<br />

in homes with one or two children<br />

(single cases).<br />

Analysis did not confirm relation<br />

between sex and aggression towards<br />

people, but it worthy to note that only one<br />

case was reported in intact males. Aggression<br />

was more frequent in females, both<br />

intact and spayed (Tab. 6).<br />

Aggression towards people was generally<br />

reported with cats that were permanently<br />

kept indoor. It was far less<br />

common in cats allowed out on regular<br />

basis. Although this difference was<br />

noticeable, it was not statistically significant.<br />

It can be presumed that such cats<br />

are given enough time to spend most <strong>of</strong><br />

their energy on playing, chasing etc. and<br />

therefore are much calmer when come<br />

back. Additionally, some owners tend<br />

to mistake rough plays for aggression<br />

<strong>–</strong> when cats spend at least some time<br />

outdoor, both remain unnoticed.<br />

Interestingly, this type <strong>of</strong> aggression<br />

was most frequently reported with cats<br />

purchased/adopted from other homes, but<br />

not a single case was reported with those<br />

purchased from breeders. Once more,<br />

statistical analysis did not confirm significant<br />

relation between aggression and<br />

origin <strong>of</strong> cats, possibly due to marked differences<br />

in numbers in specified groups.<br />

More aggression cases were found in<br />

cats purchased/adopted before they were<br />

two months <strong>of</strong> age. This can be attributed<br />

to inadequate or improper socialization<br />

<strong>–</strong> people <strong>of</strong>ten ignore rough behaviour<br />

at plays and do not teach kittens how to<br />

control and inhibit aggressive behaviors.<br />

As shown in Table 6, aggression was displayed<br />

more <strong>of</strong>ten by cats in households<br />

with no other cats and pets, possibly for<br />

same reasons.<br />

Excessive self-grooming<br />

Excessive grooming behaviours were<br />

observed only in 7 cats and this number is<br />

insufficient for drawing any conclusions.<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> those, most cases were reported<br />

with neutered males and fewest <strong>–</strong> with<br />

females (Tab. 7). It occurred in 2 cats under<br />

TABLE 7. Influence <strong>of</strong> sex, age and breed on<br />

excessive self-grooming<br />

Sex<br />

Excessive self-grooming<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

Male 1 2.3 43 97.7 44<br />

Female 1 1.8 55 98.2 56<br />

Castrated<br />

male 3 3.3 88 96.7 91<br />

Spayed<br />

female 2 2.6 76 97.4 78<br />

Total 7 2.6 262 97.4 269<br />

Age<br />

0<strong>–</strong>2 2 3.5 55 96.5 57<br />

2<strong>–</strong>8 1 0.7 141 99.3 142<br />

> 8 3 4.8 60 95.2 63<br />

Total 6 2.3 256 97.7 262<br />

Breed<br />

European 6 2.9 203 97.1 209<br />

Mix 0 0.0 17 100 17<br />

Pure bred 1 2.3 42 97.7 43<br />

Total 7 2.6 262 97.4 269


22 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

TABLE 8. Influence <strong>of</strong> living conditions on excessive self-grooming<br />

Living condition<br />

Excessive grooming<br />

yes % no %<br />

Total<br />

Exclusively indoor 5 3.6 135 96.4 140<br />

Limited access outdoor 2 2.3 84 97.7 86<br />

Unlimited 0 0.0 43 100 43<br />

Total 7 2.6 262 97.4 269<br />

Origin <strong>of</strong> cat<br />

Cattery 0 0.0 28 100 28<br />

Born and reared in current home 0 0.0 15 100 15<br />

Born in other household 3 3.6 80 96.4 83<br />

Adopted as strays or <strong>of</strong> unknown origin 4 2.8 139 97.2 143<br />

Total 7 2.6 262 97.4 269<br />

Age at time <strong>of</strong> purchase/adoption<br />

Kitten up to 2 months 3 2.2 136 97.8 139<br />

From 2 months up to 2 years 2 1.8 107 98.2 109<br />

Over 2 years 2 10.0 18 90.0 20<br />

Total 7 2.6 261 97.4 268<br />

2 years <strong>of</strong> age, in 1 between 2 and 8 years,<br />

and in 3 over 8 years. One case related to<br />

a cat whose age was not determined. Only<br />

one <strong>of</strong> those cats was pure-bred, whereas<br />

all others were <strong>of</strong> random breeding.<br />

When analyzing possible relations<br />

between excessive grooming and living<br />

conditions, it is worth noticing that no<br />

case occurred in cats, having unlimited<br />

access to outside world, and also in cats<br />

born in their current homes or purchased<br />

from breeders (Tab. 8). Far more cases<br />

were reported with cats purchased/<br />

/adopted after they had finished 2 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age. Confining cats in limited space and<br />

change <strong>of</strong> environment may both lead to<br />

stress and it manifests itself by excessive<br />

grooming behaviors. It can be also<br />

presumed that selective breeding aims<br />

at producing individuals better suited to<br />

living as family pets.<br />

Autoaggression<br />

Only few cases were reported, therefore<br />

it was not possible to study any influence<br />

on them. Survey revealed 5 cases<br />

(1.9%), all <strong>of</strong> them in neutered individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> European breed, adopted and <strong>of</strong><br />

unknown origin. 4 cases were attributed<br />

to cats kept permanently indoor and in<br />

one case a cat was occasionally allowed<br />

out. This clearly indicates that restricted<br />

living conditions negatively influence<br />

animal well-being, especially in case <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals used to live semi-wild for at<br />

least part <strong>of</strong> their lives.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Undesirable behaviours were observed in<br />

73% <strong>of</strong> all animals surveyed. This result<br />

is distinctly higher than any previous<br />

ones, reported by different authors.


Occurrence <strong>of</strong> behavioural disorders in domestic cats 23<br />

The most common behaviour was<br />

scratching furniture and walls, found in<br />

52% <strong>of</strong> cats. It was significantly more<br />

common in case <strong>of</strong> animals adopted before<br />

they were 2 months old, in households<br />

with no other animals present, but with<br />

children aged 5<strong>–</strong>10 and 14<strong>–</strong>18 years.<br />

The second most frequent behaviour<br />

was urinating/defecating in places other<br />

than provided for these purposes,<br />

observed in 23.8% <strong>of</strong> animals. It occurred<br />

two times more <strong>of</strong>ten in cats over 8 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age than in younger ones. Contrary to<br />

results reported earlier, it was also twice<br />

more common in neutered cats, irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> their sex.<br />

Aggression towards other cats was<br />

reported in almost 20% <strong>of</strong> cats and was<br />

significantly influenced by age <strong>–</strong> most<br />

cases were observed among specimens<br />

over 8 years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>–</strong> as well as by living<br />

conditions (aggression was far less<br />

common among cats, kept permanently<br />

indoor).<br />

Aggression towards other animals<br />

occurred in 10% <strong>of</strong> cats and it was more<br />

frequent in females, both intact and<br />

spayed, than in males. It was also significantly<br />

more common among cats, having<br />

unlimited access outdoor.<br />

Destructive behaviours were reported<br />

in 10% <strong>of</strong> all cats and no influence <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

taken into consideration was found.<br />

Aggression towards people was rare<br />

<strong>–</strong> only 6.7% cases. Despite such low<br />

numbers, we found correlations between<br />

this type <strong>of</strong> aggression and number <strong>of</strong><br />

children present in household <strong>–</strong> the more<br />

children, the higher likelihood <strong>of</strong> aggression.<br />

Excessive grooming behaviours were<br />

found in 7 cats (2.6%) and autoaggression<br />

<strong>–</strong> in 5 cats (1.9%).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BEAVER B.V., 2003: Feline Behavior. Elsevier<br />

Health <strong>Sciences</strong>, 335.<br />

BERGMAN L., HART B.L., BAIN M., CLIFF K.,<br />

2002: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> urine marking by cats as<br />

a model for understanding veterinary diagnostic<br />

and treatment approaches and client attitudes.<br />

J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 221(9): 1282<strong>–</strong>1286.<br />

BLACKSHAW J.K., ALLAN D.J., McGREEVY<br />

P., 2003: Notes on some topics in applied animal<br />

behavior. School <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Science,<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane,<br />

Australia.<br />

BORCHELT P.L., VOITH V.L., 1996: Common<br />

Behaviour Problems and their Management:<br />

Feline and Canine. In: VOITH V.L., BOR-<br />

CHELT P.L., [eds] Readings in Companion<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Behavior. Trenton, Veterinary Learning<br />

Systems, 208<strong>–</strong>216.<br />

HART B.L., COOPER L.C., 1984: Factors relating<br />

to urine <strong>–</strong> spraying and fighting in pre-pubertally<br />

gonadectomized cats. J. Am. Vet. Med.<br />

Assoc. 203: 254<strong>–</strong>258.<br />

HEIDENBERGER E., 1997: Housing conditions<br />

and behavioural problems <strong>of</strong> indoor cats as assessed<br />

by their owners. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.<br />

52: 345<strong>–</strong>364.<br />

HORWITZ D., 1997: Behavioural and environmental<br />

factors associated with elimination behaviour<br />

problems in cats: A retrospective study.<br />

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 52(1<strong>–</strong>2): 129<strong>–</strong>137.<br />

HORZINEK M.C., SCHMIDT V., LUTZ H.,<br />

2004: Praktyka kliniczna: Koty. Wyd. Galaktyka,<br />

Bratislava 2004; rozdz. 1.<br />

KUDŁA J., 2006: Zaburzenia behawioralne u psów<br />

i kotów w podeszłym wieku. Magazyn Weterynaryjny,<br />

109: 38<strong>–</strong>40.<br />

KUDŁA J., 2008: Przyczyny agresji u kotów.<br />

Magazyn Weterynaryjny, 134: 506<strong>–</strong>508.<br />

LANDSBERG G., HUNTHAUSEN W., ACKER-<br />

MAN L., 2003: Handbook <strong>of</strong> Behaviour Problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Dog and Cat. Butterworth-Heinemann,<br />

Oxford, England, 365<strong>–</strong>384.<br />

LEVINE E., PERRY P., SCERLETT J., HOUPT<br />

K.A., 2005: Intercat aggression in households<br />

following the introduction <strong>of</strong> a new cat. Appl.<br />

Anim. Behav. Sci. 90: 325<strong>–</strong>336.<br />

LINDELL E.M., ERB H.N., HOUPT K.A., 1997:<br />

Intercat aggression: a retrospective study examining<br />

types <strong>of</strong> aggression, sexes <strong>of</strong> fighting pairs,


24 K. Fiszdon, K. Góral, J. Narojek<br />

and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> treatment. Appl. Anim.<br />

Behav. Sci. 55, 153<strong>–</strong>162.<br />

LOFFLIN J., 2009: Problem eutanazji. Jak mogą<br />

pomóc lekarze weterynarii. Weterynaria po<br />

Dyplomie vol 10(1): 6.<br />

MARDER A.R., 1991: Psychotropic drugs and<br />

behavioural therapy. In: MARDER A.R.,<br />

VOIHT V.L., [eds] Advances in Companion<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Behavior. Vet Clin North Am; 21(2):<br />

329<strong>–</strong>342.<br />

PATRONEK G.J., GLICKMAN L.T., BECK<br />

A.M., 1996; Risk factors for relinquishment <strong>of</strong><br />

cats to an animal shelter. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American<br />

Veterinary Medical Association, 209:<br />

582<strong>–</strong>588.<br />

SEKSEL K., 2000: Feline Urine Spraying. In:<br />

HOUPT K.A., [eds] Recent Advances in Companion<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Behaviour Problems, International<br />

Veterinary Information Service.<br />

VOITH V.L., 1981: Therapeutic approaches to<br />

feline urinary behaviour problems. Modern<br />

Veterinary Practice, 62: 951.<br />

Streszczenie: Występowanie zaburzeń zachowania<br />

u kotów domowych. Przeprowadzono badania<br />

ankietowe wśród właścicieli 269 kotów. Analizowano<br />

wpływ takich czynników, jak płeć, wiek,<br />

rasa, pochodzenie, wiek, w którym kot przybył do<br />

domu, swoboda wychodzenia z domu, obecność<br />

innych zwierząt, liczba domowników na występowanie<br />

nieprawidłowych zachowań. Wyniki analizowano<br />

testem Chi 2 , a do określenia siły związku<br />

między cechami wykorzystano współczynnik<br />

V-Kramera. Nieprawidłowe zachowania odnotowano<br />

u 73% badanych kotów. Ponad 50% kotów<br />

drapało ściany i meble. Na zachowanie to miał<br />

wpływ wiek, w którym koty przybyły do domu,<br />

brak w domu innych zwierząt i wiek mieszkających<br />

w nim dzieci. 23,8% kotów wydalało w nieodpowiednich<br />

miejscach. Na zachowanie to istotny<br />

wpływ miał wiek kotów (najczęściej zwierzęta<br />

starsze), status reprodukcyjny <strong>–</strong> częściej u kotów<br />

sterylizowanych bez względu na płeć i obecność<br />

w domu innych zwierząt. Agresja w stosunku do<br />

innych kotów wystąpiła u 20% badanych zwierząt.<br />

Najczęściej pojawiała się u kotów powyżej<br />

8. roku życia, była przy tym znacznie częstsza<br />

u kotów wychodzących z domu.<br />

Agresja w stosunku do zwierząt innych gatunków<br />

wystąpiła u 10% kotów. Problem ten zdarzał<br />

się istotnie częściej u samic niż samców i u kotów<br />

wychodzących z domu bez ograniczeń.<br />

Pozostałe nieprawidłowe zachowania odnotowane<br />

w badaniach to niszczenie przedmiotów<br />

(8%), agresja w stosunku do ludzi (6,7%) <strong>–</strong> istotnie<br />

częstsza w domach, w których było więcej<br />

dzieci, nadmierna pielęgnacja (2,6%) i autoagresja<br />

(1,9%).<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Ogólnej Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

<strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: katarzyna_fiszdon@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 25<strong>–</strong>30<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> Aminokarnifarm preparate on composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> chicken broilers<br />

JULITTA GAJEWSKA 1 , MONIKA MICHALCZUK 2 ,<br />

MONIKA ŁUKASIEWICZ 2 , KINGA WILCZYŃSKA-CZYŻ 1 , JAN NIEMIEC 2<br />

1<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Biology <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Science, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Influence <strong>of</strong> Aminokarnifarm preparate<br />

on composition <strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> chicken<br />

broilers. The experiment was carried out on 640<br />

broiler chickens <strong>of</strong> Cobb 500, which were at random<br />

allocated to two nutritional groups; broilers<br />

from experimental group obtained with water Aminokarnifarm<br />

preparate, according to producent’s<br />

directions. After end <strong>of</strong> rearing, a quantitative and<br />

qualitative determinations <strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora<br />

in small intestine content at chicken broilers were<br />

done. The received results showed on the increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> a total number <strong>of</strong> lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in<br />

a content <strong>of</strong> small intestinal tract in experimental<br />

group, in comparison with control group. The total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> the heterotrophic intestinal bacteria<br />

didn’t distinguish significantly from control and<br />

experimental group. In tested probes <strong>of</strong> intestinal<br />

contents <strong>of</strong> broilers Salmonella sp. Shigella sp.,<br />

beta haemolytic Escherichia coli and reducing sulphates<br />

Clostridium perfringens pathogenic bacteria<br />

were no isolated. Addition <strong>of</strong> Aminocarnifarm<br />

preparate showed lack <strong>of</strong> influence on decrease <strong>of</strong><br />

coli/lacto index in small intestine <strong>of</strong> chicken broilers.<br />

The values <strong>of</strong> coli/lacto index were low<br />

(under 1), what indicated on a proper composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora.<br />

Key words: chicken broilers, Aminocarnifarm<br />

preparate, micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> small intestine content.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Health and production efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

broiler chickens is influenced by the composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> bacterial micr<strong>of</strong>lora content <strong>of</strong><br />

the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, preparates<br />

that do not interfere with the state<br />

called homeostasis normal micr<strong>of</strong>lora,<br />

present in the form <strong>of</strong> indigenous intestinal<br />

colonizers should be used. The action<br />

<strong>of</strong> such preparations should be beneficial<br />

and increase the number <strong>of</strong> fermentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> probiotic bacteria, which reside in the<br />

gastrointestinal ecosystem (Gajewska<br />

et al., 2000, 2003, 2009; Pietras, 2001;<br />

Józefiak et al., 2002; Seskeviciene, 2005;<br />

Oviedo-Rondon et al., 2006). For many<br />

years in the nutrition <strong>of</strong> poultry additives<br />

are commonly used, where the action is<br />

focused on the development <strong>of</strong> friendly<br />

gut micr<strong>of</strong>lora, improve the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

carcasses, meat and technological value<br />

<strong>of</strong> its suitability for processing (Michalczuk<br />

et al., 2003; Pietrzak et al., 2005).<br />

Polish consumer is very demanding and<br />

looking for a product with low fat and<br />

high meat quality (visual and sensory<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> carcass) (Gornowicz,<br />

2008) at the moment. However manufacturers<br />

are trying to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

product, which <strong>of</strong>ten does not allow to<br />

use in the diet expensive additives which<br />

are effective and have additive a wide


26 J. Gajewska et al.<br />

effect, e.g. L-carnitine used most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

in flocks <strong>of</strong> breeding poultry, improving<br />

sperm concentration, hatchability and<br />

affecting production results (Zhai, 2008;<br />

Keralapurath et al., 2010; Shafey et al.,<br />

2010). Application <strong>of</strong> 20 to 100 mg per<br />

kg feed, L-carnitine in the nutrition <strong>of</strong><br />

poultry for slaughter allows for a reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat content in carcass (Rabie et al.,<br />

1997a, b; Arslan et al., 2004). There are<br />

however, no reports on the effects <strong>of</strong> L-<br />

-carnitine on the composition <strong>of</strong> intestinal<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens therefore<br />

Aminokarnifarm was used to because<br />

(43.68% <strong>of</strong> L-carnitine) to determine<br />

the composition <strong>of</strong> the micr<strong>of</strong>lora in the<br />

small intestine <strong>of</strong> chickens.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The experiment was conducted in poultry<br />

farm <strong>of</strong> Experimental Station (RZD)<br />

Wilanów-Obory on 640 broiler chickens<br />

<strong>of</strong> COBB 500. One-day chicks were at<br />

random allocated to 2 groups: control<br />

and experimental (Aminokarnifarm), each<br />

<strong>of</strong> them in four repetitions. The birds<br />

were kept on the litter, according to the<br />

standards for management <strong>of</strong> broilers, as<br />

recommended by Cobb company. The<br />

differentiating factor was the administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the group Aminokarnifarm<br />

to water for the experimental group <strong>of</strong><br />

chickens.<br />

Aminokarnifarm is a preparation<br />

amino acid vitamin, which a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> vitamins and amino acids with taurine<br />

(13.33%) and L-carnitine (43.68%) has<br />

a very strong anabolic effects, improving<br />

production results. The preparation<br />

ensures the proper metabolism <strong>of</strong> fatty<br />

acids and amino acids, sufficient production<br />

<strong>of</strong> energy from ketones, regulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> ammonia in the<br />

blood, stimulation the immune system,<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> respiration and active<br />

transport <strong>of</strong> ATP at the cellular level.<br />

Composition <strong>of</strong> the preparation has a significant<br />

impact on the proper functioning<br />

<strong>of</strong> all systems in the body, in particular<br />

neurohormonal system, digestive, circulatory<br />

and reproductive. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

L-carnitine determines the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

the body, muscle strength, cardiac activity,<br />

in combination with the metabolism<br />

<strong>of</strong> amino acids enhances the whole body<br />

and neutralizes the negative effects <strong>of</strong><br />

various types <strong>of</strong> stress factors (Bi<strong>of</strong>aktor<br />

<strong>–</strong> producer information).<br />

Aminokarnifarm was added in drinking<br />

water in quantities <strong>of</strong> 100 g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> 160 liters <strong>of</strong> water, rearing<br />

on the following dates: 1<strong>–</strong>7 days, 21<strong>–</strong>28<br />

days, 35<strong>–</strong>42 days. During the rearing<br />

<strong>of</strong> chickens from the control group and<br />

experimental (Aminokarnifarm) were fed<br />

compound having the following nutritional<br />

value: Starter from 1 to 14 day<br />

(22.1% crude protein and 13.7 MJ <strong>of</strong><br />

EM). Grower from 15 to 35 day (20.4%<br />

crude protein and 14.1 MJ <strong>of</strong> EM).<br />

Finisher from 36 to 42 day (19.1%<br />

crude protein and 14.3 MJ EM, without<br />

coccidiostatic). On 42 day, from 9 males<br />

and 9 females, parts <strong>of</strong> intestinal were taken<br />

after slaughter. The aim was to determinations<br />

quantitative and qualitative factors<br />

<strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora in small intestine<br />

content <strong>of</strong> chicken broilers.<br />

Quantitative determination <strong>of</strong> small<br />

intestine content, received from two<br />

feeding groups, were done by standat<br />

Koch’s plate method, with surface sowing<br />

(Salyers, Whitt, 2003).<br />

The following microbiological rates<br />

were determined:


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> Aminokarnifarm preparate... 27<br />

1) the total number <strong>of</strong> the heterotrophic<br />

mesophilic bacteria growed on nutrient<br />

agar medium and nutrient agar<br />

medium with 5% <strong>of</strong> defibrinated sheep<br />

blood addition;<br />

2) the total number <strong>of</strong> bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae<br />

family, growed on<br />

McConkey’s medium;<br />

3) the total number <strong>of</strong> lactic acid fermentation<br />

bacteria (LAB) from Lactobacillaceae<br />

family, growed on APT<br />

medium;<br />

4) the total number <strong>of</strong> the microscopic<br />

fungi, growed on Sabouraud’s medium;<br />

5) the Most Probable Number (MPN) <strong>of</strong><br />

sulphate reducing Clostridium perfringens<br />

bacteria, growed on Wilson-<br />

-Blair’s medium;<br />

6) determination coli/lacto index, as a rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> a total number <strong>of</strong> bacteria from<br />

Enterobactericeae family to Lactobacillaceae<br />

family.<br />

In next investigations, the macroscopic<br />

tests <strong>of</strong> the grown colonies were<br />

done. Microscopic tests, on the ground <strong>of</strong><br />

observation <strong>of</strong> living fungi and bacteria or<br />

stained bacteria by Gram method; using<br />

Nikon E600 microscope with camera<br />

were performed. On the ground <strong>of</strong> morphological<br />

and physiological properties,<br />

the species <strong>of</strong> the isolated strains were<br />

determined according to Bergey’s Maual<br />

<strong>of</strong> Systematic Bacteriology (2000).<br />

The obtained results were evaluated<br />

with a variance analysis, calculated with<br />

the least square method in a statistical<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware SPSS 14.0 PL for Windows.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> microbiological determination<br />

connected with state estimation <strong>of</strong> small<br />

intestine micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> chicken broilers,<br />

received with water Aminocarnifarm<br />

preparate, were presented on Figure 1.<br />

There was explicit number <strong>of</strong> lactic<br />

acid bacteria in small intestine in the<br />

experimental group <strong>of</strong> broilers in com-<br />

7<br />

6<br />

log jtk g <strong>–</strong>1 bw<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

I II III IV<br />

Control<br />

Aminokarnifarm<br />

FIGURE 1. The total number <strong>of</strong> bacteria and microscopic fungi in small intestine content <strong>of</strong> chicken<br />

broilers: I <strong>–</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> bacteria; II <strong>–</strong> Lactobacillaceae; III <strong>–</strong> Enterobacteriaceae; IV <strong>–</strong> yeasts<br />

and hyphal fungi


28 J. Gajewska et al.<br />

parison to the controlled group. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> beneficial microorganisms<br />

which protect against pathogens has<br />

increased. The effect <strong>of</strong> this probiotic<br />

bacteria in lactic fermentation can lead<br />

to the improvement <strong>of</strong> general condition<br />

and health <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens.<br />

There were no significant differences<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> heterotrophic intestine<br />

bacteria between the experimental and<br />

controlled group. This can be caused by<br />

the higher number <strong>of</strong> lactic acid bacteria,<br />

not the pathogens. No pathogenic<br />

bacteria such as: Samonella sp., Shigella<br />

sp., E. coli beta haemolytic and Clostridium<br />

perfringens reducing sulphate were<br />

observed (in both examined cut <strong>of</strong> the<br />

digestive contents <strong>of</strong> the small intestine).<br />

There was an insignificant number<br />

<strong>of</strong> microscopic fungi (yeast and hyphal<br />

fungi) at the low level (below10 2 ⋅jtk⋅g <strong>–</strong>1 )<br />

(in the digestive contents <strong>of</strong> the small<br />

intestine from the experimental group).<br />

This can be a result <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong><br />

such bacteria as Lactobacillus sp. in this<br />

group. This bacteria acidifies its environment<br />

by producing lactic acid, and<br />

the low reaction (pH) is responsible for<br />

the fungi increase. Furthermore, that<br />

the antagonistic lactic bacterial strain in<br />

comparison to fungi seemed to be inefficient<br />

for lactic bacteria fermentation<br />

and (LAB) the general condition and<br />

health condition <strong>of</strong> broiler chicken can<br />

be improved. L-carnitine has detoxifying<br />

features due to the chelates ability. However,<br />

the chelations ability is common<br />

almost in every organic acid, nevertheless<br />

only few kinds <strong>of</strong> such substances<br />

can be considered as an exemplary. The<br />

exemplary chelates substances with the<br />

optimum biding ability are as follows:<br />

ascorbic acid and L-carnitine. L-carnitine<br />

facilitates the absorption and transport<br />

<strong>of</strong> bioelements and keep them in the<br />

body store, returning them to metabolism<br />

when needed, removes potentially<br />

destructive surplus <strong>of</strong> bioelements and<br />

eliminate toxic elements (Ambroziak,<br />

2000).<br />

The Figure 2 shows the results <strong>of</strong><br />

coli/lacto calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the Enterobacteriaceace to<br />

Lactobacillaceae number. Aminikarnifarm<br />

did not have a significant effect<br />

on lowing coli/lacto coefficient in the<br />

small intestine. However, above mentioned,<br />

coli/lacto was low (below 1) in<br />

the experimental and controlled group,<br />

which shows proper and positive composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> intestine micro flora. In the<br />

Gajewska’s research (2009) a positive<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> plant preparations on the intestine<br />

micro flora <strong>of</strong> broiler chicken can be<br />

seen. When used with the Digestarom<br />

preparation coli/lacto was 0.14. Some<br />

authors claimed that the results where<br />

poultry farmers use herb preparations,<br />

are comparable to antibiotic growth<br />

stimulators used in the past such as: avilamycine<br />

(Jamroz, Kamel, 2004; Lee at<br />

al., 2004).<br />

log jtk g <strong>–</strong>1 bw<br />

0,9<br />

0,7<br />

0,5<br />

0,3<br />

0,1<br />

Control<br />

Aminokarnifarm<br />

FIGURE 2. Coefficient coli/lacto in the small intestine<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>lora basing on the Aminokarnifarm<br />

experiment


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> Aminokarnifarm preparate... 29<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> quantitative and qualitative<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the intestinal contents<br />

<strong>of</strong> broiler chickens fed with feed<br />

preparation Aminokarnifarm indicate its<br />

beneficial effects.<br />

Effect amino acid-vitamin preparation<br />

with carnitine resulted in a significant<br />

increase in the number <strong>of</strong> so-called.<br />

Beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB<br />

<strong>–</strong> Lactic Acid Bacteria), lactic acid<br />

rods <strong>of</strong> the genus Lactobacillus, which<br />

belong to the family Lactobacillaceae<br />

are excellent producers lantabiotics, prevent<br />

from intestinal pathogens, known<br />

for their probiotic features. It seems<br />

that the preparation used can be a very<br />

good complement <strong>of</strong> nutrients, providing<br />

better conditions for the multiplication<br />

<strong>of</strong> heterotrophic bacterial colonization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gut and their metabolism. It was<br />

also observed a positive relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

the ratio <strong>of</strong> (the number <strong>of</strong>) bacteria <strong>of</strong><br />

the family Enterobacteriaceae to Lactobacillacae<br />

after applying this medicine.<br />

Coefficient coli/lacto below 1 indicates<br />

the correct status <strong>of</strong> intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora<br />

in broiler chickens. Application <strong>of</strong> lactic<br />

acid bacteria <strong>of</strong> the genus Lactobacillus,<br />

known as EM (Effective Microorganisms)<br />

in the integrated EM-FarmingTM<br />

in poultry farming, resulted not only in<br />

the world, but also in Poland positive<br />

production results (high body weight,<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> mortality and health conditions)<br />

(Dylewski, 2009).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

AMBROZIAK S., 2000: L-carnitine (witamin B T )<br />

beauty and health. Warszawa (in Polish).<br />

ARSLAN C., CITIL M., SAATCI M., 2004: Effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> L-carnitine administration on growth<br />

performance, carcass traits, serum lipids and<br />

abdominal fatty acid compositions <strong>of</strong> geese.<br />

Revue Med. Vet., 155, 6, 315<strong>–</strong>320.<br />

Bergey’s Manual <strong>of</strong> Systematic Bacteriology.:<br />

The Williams & Wilkins Co. 2000. Baltimore.<br />

Bi<strong>of</strong>aktor <strong>–</strong> producer information.<br />

DYLEWSKI T., 2009: Microorganisms <strong>–</strong> opponent<br />

or friend. In: Natural probiotical microorganisms.<br />

[ed.] Dylewski T. Ecosystem EM<br />

Society. Nature Heritage, Licheń, 86<strong>–</strong>94 (in<br />

Polish).<br />

GAJEWSKA J., GAZDA M., GORCZYŃSKA K.,<br />

2003: Determination <strong>of</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong> chosen<br />

bacterial and fungal strains on spice and herbs<br />

extracts In: Microbiological Decomposition<br />

and Corrosion <strong>of</strong> Technical Materials. Polytechnic<br />

<strong>of</strong> Łódź, 318<strong>–</strong>321 (in Polish).<br />

GAJEWSKA J., BUCKA J., ŻABIK A., RIEDEL<br />

J., MICHALCZUK M., 2009: Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

natural plants preparates on state <strong>of</strong> intestinal<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> chicken broilers. Protection <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment and Natural Resources. 41, 302<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>309 (in Polish).<br />

GAJEWSKA J., NIEMIEC J., REKOSZ-BUR-<br />

LAGA H., 2000: Effect <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> „Greenline”<br />

preparations to feed mixtures for broilers<br />

on the composition <strong>of</strong> their intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora.<br />

Acta Microbiol. Pol. 51 (1), 71<strong>–</strong>78.<br />

GORNOWICZ E., 2008: The effects <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

factors during broiler chicken rearing on quality<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> carcass and meat. Monographs and<br />

dissertations. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. Kraków (in<br />

Polish).<br />

JAMROZ D., KAMEL C., 2004: Plant extracts<br />

enhance broiler performance. J. Anim. Sci. 80,<br />

suppl. 1, p. 41 (Abstract).<br />

JÓZEFIAK D., RUTKOWSKI A., FRĄTCZAK<br />

M., FIDYCH T., 2002: Application <strong>of</strong> selected<br />

replacements for antibiotic growth promoters<br />

in feed for broiler chickens. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot.,<br />

Supl. 16, 211<strong>–</strong>217 (in Polish).<br />

KERALAPURATH M.M., CORZO A., PULI-<br />

KANTI R., ZIAI W., PEEBLES E.D, 2010.:<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> in ovo injection <strong>of</strong> L-carnitine on<br />

hatchability and subsequent broiler performance<br />

and slaughter field. Poult. Sci., 89 (2),<br />

335<strong>–</strong>341.<br />

LEE K-W., EVERTS H., BEYNEN A.C., 2004:<br />

Essential oils in broiler nutrition. Int. J. Poult.<br />

Sci., 3 (12), 738<strong>–</strong>752.


30 J. Gajewska et al.<br />

MICHALCZUK M., NIEMIEC J., DĘBEK J., 2003:<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> antibiotic growth stimulant replacers<br />

on broiler chicken performance. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Przegl. Hod., 68 (4), 119<strong>–</strong>124 (in Polish).<br />

OVIEDO-RONDON E.O., CLEMENTE-HER-<br />

NANDEZ S., SALVADOR F., WILLIAMS P.,<br />

LOSA R., 2006: Essential oils on mixed coccidia<br />

vaccination and infection in broilers. Int. J.<br />

Poult. Sci., 5 (8), 723<strong>–</strong>730.<br />

PIETRAS M., 2001: The effect <strong>of</strong> probiotics on<br />

selected blood and meat parameters <strong>of</strong> broiler<br />

chickens. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 10, Supl., 2, 297<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>302.<br />

PIETRZAK D., MROCZEK J., ANTOLIK A.,<br />

MICHALCZUK M., NIEMIEC J., 2005: Influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth stimulators added to feed on<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> meat and fat in broiler chickens.<br />

Med. Wet., 61 (5), 553<strong>–</strong>557.<br />

RABIE M.H., SZILAGYI M., GIPPERT T.,<br />

VOTISKY E., GERENDAI D., 1997b: Influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> dietary L-carnitine on performance and<br />

carcass quality <strong>of</strong> broiler chickens. Acta Biol.<br />

Hung., 48, 241<strong>–</strong>252.<br />

RABIE M.H., SZILAGYI M., GIPPERT T.,<br />

1997a: Effects <strong>of</strong> dietary L-carnitine supplementation<br />

and protein level on performance<br />

and degree <strong>of</strong> meatiness and fatness <strong>of</strong> broilers.<br />

Acta Biol. Hung., 48, 221<strong>–</strong>229.<br />

SALYERS A.A., WHITT D.D., 2003: Microbiology.<br />

Diversity, pathogenicity, environment.<br />

[ed.] Z. Markiewicz. Nat. Sci. Publisher <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

(in Polish).<br />

SESKEVICIENE J., KOZŁOWSKI K., JAN-<br />

KOWSKI J., FARUGA A., 2005: Use <strong>of</strong> a Sanguinaria<br />

canadensis L. preparation in turkey<br />

feeding. Pol. J. Nat. Scie., 18 (1), 83<strong>–</strong>91.<br />

SHAFEY T.M., AL.-BATSHAN H.A., AL.-<br />

-OWAIMER A.N., AL.-SAMAWEI K.A.,<br />

2010: Effect <strong>of</strong> In ovo administration <strong>of</strong> L-carnitine<br />

on hatchability performance, glycogen<br />

status and insulin-like growth factor-1 <strong>of</strong> broiler<br />

chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 51 (1), 122<strong>–</strong>131.<br />

SPSS 2006. SPSS, 14.0 for Windows user’s<br />

guide, 2006, by SPSS Ins. USA.<br />

ZHAI W., NEUMAN S.L., LATOUR M.A.,<br />

HESTER P.Y., 2008: The effect <strong>of</strong> male and<br />

female supplementation <strong>of</strong> L-carnitine on reproductive<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> white Leghorns. Poult. Sci.,<br />

87, 1171<strong>–</strong>1181.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ preparatu Aminokarnifarm<br />

na skład mikr<strong>of</strong>l ory jelitowej kurcząt brojlerów.<br />

Badania przeprowadzono na 640 kurczętach<br />

COBB 500, podzielonych losowo na dwie grupy<br />

żywieniowe, kurczęta z grupy doświadczalnej<br />

otrzymywały do wody preparat Aminokarnifarm<br />

wg zaleceń producenta. Po zakończeniu odchowu<br />

wykonano ilościowe i jakościowe badania mikr<strong>of</strong>lory<br />

jelitowej w treści jelita cienkiego kurcząt<br />

rzeźnych. Uzyskane wyniki wykazały wzrost<br />

liczebności bakterii kwasu mlekowego w treści<br />

jelita cienkiego brojlerów w grupie eksperymentalnej,<br />

w porównaniu z grupą kontrolną. Ogólna<br />

liczba heterotr<strong>of</strong>icznych bakterii jelitowych<br />

nie różniła się znacznie między grupą kontrolną<br />

a doświadczalną. Nie stwierdzono w badanych<br />

próbkach treści jelita cienkiego brojlerów obecności<br />

chorobotwórczych bakterii: Salmonella sp.,<br />

Shigella sp., E. coli beta hemolitycznych oraz<br />

Clostridium perfringens redukujących siarczyny.<br />

Aminokarnifarm nie miał istotnego wpływu na<br />

obniżanie współczynnika coli/lacto w jelicie cienkim<br />

kurcząt. Wartości współczynnika coli/lacto<br />

w grupie doświadczalnej i kontrolnej miały wartości<br />

niskie (poniżej 1), co wskazywało na właściwy<br />

skład mikr<strong>of</strong>lory jelitowej.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Monika Michalczuk<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: monika_michalczuk@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 31<strong>–</strong>38<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> dairy cows<br />

with bulls <strong>of</strong> French breeds (Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise,<br />

Limousine) on calving course<br />

HENRYK GRODZKI, TOMASZ PRZYSUCHA, JAN SLÓSARZ<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: The influence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding<br />

<strong>of</strong> dairy cows with bulls <strong>of</strong> French breeds<br />

(Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise, Limousine) on<br />

calving course. The aim <strong>of</strong> presented study was<br />

to indicate the influence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on<br />

calving course in commercial crossing <strong>of</strong> Black<br />

and White cows with bulls <strong>of</strong> the French breeds:<br />

Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise and Limousine.<br />

The calving number significantly influenced delivery<br />

course <strong>of</strong> Charolaise and Limousine cows,<br />

but in case <strong>of</strong> Blonde d’Aquitaine did not. The<br />

most difficult deliveries were noticed for the heifers<br />

and cows delivered the second calf. In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Limousine cows BCS described as “more than<br />

enough” the number <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings was<br />

26.7%, Charolaise <strong>–</strong> 20%, Blonde d’Aquitaine<br />

<strong>–</strong> 100%. It confirms, that regardless <strong>of</strong> the breed,<br />

fatty cows have much more problems during the<br />

delivery. The influence <strong>of</strong> calf body weight at<br />

birth on calving course was statistically proved<br />

for Charolaise and Limousine, also in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Blonde s’Aquitaine the most difficult calvings<br />

were observed when the birth weight was higher<br />

than 40 kg. The obtained results show the extraordinary<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> the French breeds for commercial<br />

crossing with the dairy cows.<br />

Key words: commercial crossing, calving course,<br />

Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise, Limousine.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In the new sector <strong>of</strong> animal production<br />

in Poland, i.e. beef cattle breeding and<br />

husbandry, one <strong>of</strong> the main problems<br />

occurred is calving quality not only in<br />

purebred beef herds, but also in case <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial crossbreeding (dairy cow ×<br />

specialized beef bull).<br />

Difficult deliveries cause the meaningful<br />

financial losses due to the high<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> stillborn calves, higher labour<br />

needs, veterinary costs, worse reproduction<br />

indices etc.<br />

Papers presented by many authors<br />

show, that the problem <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings<br />

concerns mainly the purebred beef<br />

herds, when in the commercial crossing<br />

is comparable or even lower than that in<br />

purebred herds <strong>of</strong> Holstein cows, where<br />

the ratio <strong>of</strong> difficult deliveries amounts<br />

to about 15% in heifers and about 8<strong>–</strong>10%<br />

in older cows.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> presented study was to<br />

indicate the influence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors<br />

like cow age, calving number, cow BCS,<br />

calf sex and body weight at birth on<br />

calving course in commercial crossing<br />

<strong>of</strong> Holstein cows with French beef beed<br />

bulls <strong>–</strong> Blonde d’Aquitaine, Charolaise<br />

and Limousine.<br />

The short description <strong>of</strong> sires <strong>of</strong> different<br />

beef breeds used in commercial<br />

crossing were shown in tables 1, 2, 3<br />

(Chów bydła mięsnego 2009).


32 H. Grodzki, T. Przysucha, J. Slósarz<br />

TABLE 1. Blonde d’Aquitaine bulls in commercial crossing with dairy cows<br />

Suitability for crossbreeding<br />

Crossbred body weight at birth<br />

Calving course<br />

Calves vitality<br />

Crossbred suitability for fattening<br />

Dressing percentage<br />

Meat quality<br />

Dairy cows suitability for crossing<br />

Remarks<br />

<strong>–</strong> high <br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds could be fattened to the high body weight without<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> over-fattening<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (35<strong>–</strong>45 kg)<br />

<strong>–</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> self-calvings<br />

<strong>–</strong> if possible deliveries should be monitored<br />

<strong>–</strong> low percentage <strong>of</strong> stillbirths and early mortality<br />

<strong>–</strong> very good, high daily body weight gains, good feedstuff utilization,<br />

excellent muscularity, bulging, wide muscles<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (usually over 60%), but bone share in carcass not lower<br />

than in Black and White bulls<br />

<strong>–</strong> high<br />

<strong>–</strong> heifers and cows <strong>of</strong> smaller calibre could be used<br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds need some better husbandry conditions than the<br />

crossbreds with other beef breeds<br />

TABLE 2. Charolaise bulls in commercial crossing with dairy cows<br />

Suitability for crossbreeding <strong>–</strong> very high <br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds could be fattened to the high body weight without<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> over-fattening<br />

Crossbred body weight at birth <strong>–</strong> high (35<strong>–</strong>45 kg)<br />

Calving course<br />

<strong>–</strong> deliveries should be monitored<br />

Calves vitality<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (usually over 60%), but bone share in carcass not lower<br />

than in Black and White bulls<br />

Crossbred suitability for fattening <strong>–</strong> very good, high daily body weight gains, good feedstuff utilization,<br />

excellent muscularity, bulging, wide muscles<br />

Dressing percentage <strong>–</strong> high (usually over 60%)<br />

Meat quality<br />

<strong>–</strong> high<br />

Dairy cows suitability for crossing <strong>–</strong> only multiparous big calibre cows should be used<br />

Remarks<br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds need some better husbandry conditions than the<br />

crossbreds with other beef breeds<br />

TABLE 3. Limousin bulls in commercial crossing with dairy cows<br />

Suitability for crossbreeding<br />

Crossbred body weight at birth<br />

Calving course<br />

Calves vitality<br />

Crossbred suitability for fattening<br />

Dressing percentage<br />

Meat quality<br />

<strong>–</strong> very high <br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds could be fattened to the high body weight without<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> over-fattening<br />

<strong>–</strong> average 32<strong>–</strong>38 kg<br />

<strong>–</strong> deliveries should be monitored<br />

<strong>–</strong> very high<br />

<strong>–</strong> very good, high daily body weight gains, good feedstuff utilization,<br />

excellent muscularity, bulging, wide muscles<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (usually over 60%), bone share in carcass much lower<br />

than in Black and White bulls<br />

<strong>–</strong> very high


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding... 33<br />

Table 3. (continued)<br />

Dairy cows suitability for crossing<br />

Remarks<br />

<strong>–</strong> preferably multiparous cows should be used<br />

<strong>–</strong> in case <strong>of</strong> heifers semen <strong>of</strong> limousine bulls proved on base <strong>of</strong><br />

calving ease could be used<br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds need slightly better husbandry conditions than the<br />

crossbreds with the British beef breeds<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Data from “Cow calving course sheet”<br />

prepared by the field technicians from<br />

Mazovian Center for Breeding & Reproduction<br />

Co. Ltd. (Mazowieckie Centrum<br />

Hodowli i Rozrodu Zwierząt Sp. z o.o.)<br />

in Łowicz constituted the material for<br />

investigation. They concerned deliveries<br />

<strong>of</strong> Black and White cows serviced by<br />

bulls <strong>of</strong> Blonde d’Aquitaine breed (105<br />

calvings), Charolaise (103) and Limousine<br />

(289). All <strong>of</strong> 492 calvings were divided<br />

into the following groups: N <strong>–</strong> easy,<br />

without any help, T <strong>–</strong> difficult, with<br />

farmer’s help or mechanical means use.<br />

Calving course dependences on: calving<br />

number (1, 2; > 3), body condition score<br />

estimated using 9 point scale according<br />

to Richards et al. (1986) directly before<br />

planned calving day according to the<br />

following levels: 1 <strong>–</strong> bad (notes 1, 2, 3),<br />

2 <strong>–</strong> suitable (notes 4, 5, 6, 7), 3 <strong>–</strong> more<br />

than enough (notes 8, 9) as well as calf<br />

body weight at birth (kg) were assessed<br />

by Pearson χ 2 test using SPSS ver. 10.0 pl<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Calving course ratio depending on calving<br />

number was shown in Table 4. Significant<br />

(Limousine) or highly significant (Charolaise)<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> calving number on<br />

delivery quality was proved, but in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> cows mated to Blonde d’Aquitaine<br />

bulls there was no statistically significant<br />

influence in the group <strong>of</strong> adult cows, but it<br />

TABLE 4. Calving course ratio depending on calving number<br />

Breed<br />

Blonde d’Aquitaine<br />

Charolaise<br />

Limousine<br />

Trait<br />

Calving course (%)<br />

easy<br />

difficult<br />

calving number<br />

1 and 2 90.5 9.5<br />

≥ 3 91.7 8.3<br />

average 91.4 8.6<br />

significance<br />

χ 2 = 0.030 not significant<br />

calving number<br />

1 and 2 83.3 16.7<br />

≥ 3 96.3 3.7<br />

average 90.3 9.7<br />

significance χ 2 = 3.321 P ≤ 0.01<br />

calving number<br />

1 and 2 84.4 15.6<br />

≥ 3 93.4 6.6<br />

average 92.0 8.0<br />

significance χ 2 = 4.200 P ≤ 0.05


34 H. Grodzki, T. Przysucha, J. Slósarz<br />

was observed in case <strong>of</strong> heifers and young<br />

cows giving birth for the second time.<br />

Many authors (Philipsson, 1976a;<br />

Philipsson, 1976b; Sieber et al., 1989;<br />

Nogalski, Klupczyński, 1999; Krzywda<br />

et al., 2002; Albera et al., 2004; Przysucha<br />

et al., 2005b; Przysucha et al., 2005c;<br />

Przysucha et al., 2006) confirmed, that<br />

calving number has significant influence<br />

on delivery quality. Calvings where some<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> assistance is needed occurred<br />

much more <strong>of</strong>ten in case <strong>of</strong> primiparous<br />

than in multiparous cows. According to<br />

Wrona et al. (2001) insufficient pelvic<br />

area is the main reason <strong>of</strong> delivery problems<br />

in primiparous cows. Such problems<br />

also <strong>of</strong>ten take place in cows giving<br />

birth for the second time. It is connected<br />

with the smallest body measurements<br />

and not complete delivery <strong>of</strong> the sceleton<br />

<strong>of</strong> younger cows (Berger, 1994; Meyer et<br />

al., 2000). The most frequent reason <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery problems in primiparous cows is<br />

not sufficient development <strong>of</strong> the reproductive<br />

duct (Philipsson, 1976c; Nogalski,<br />

2004a; Nogalski, 2004c; Przysucha<br />

et al., 2005a; Przysucha et al., 2005b).<br />

Cows delivering for 4<strong>–</strong>5 time usually<br />

have slight problems during calving.<br />

Breeders, who decided to start the reproductive<br />

use <strong>of</strong> beef breed heifers in the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 15 month (the first delivery in the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 2 years) must consider 3<strong>–</strong>4 time<br />

higher risk <strong>of</strong> difficult calving occurrence<br />

than in case <strong>of</strong> heifers calving in<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> 3 years.<br />

Table 5 shows calving course ratio<br />

depending on cow BCS. In beef cattle<br />

evaluation procedures the 9 point scale is<br />

commonly used (Selk et al., 1986; Wiltbank,<br />

1983).<br />

The BCS changes could be used by<br />

the breeders as an indicator <strong>of</strong> feeding<br />

correctness at the particular periods <strong>of</strong><br />

TABLE 5. Calving course ratio depending on cow BCS<br />

Breed<br />

Blonde d’Aquitaine<br />

Charolaise<br />

Limousine<br />

Trait<br />

Calving course (%)<br />

easy<br />

difficult<br />

bad 96.4 3.6<br />

Cow BCS suitable 97.2 2.8<br />

more than enough 0.0 100.0<br />

average 91.4 8.6<br />

significance χ 2 = 67,893 P ≤ 0.01<br />

bad 90.1 9.9<br />

Cow BCS suitable 95.5 4.5<br />

more than enough 80 20<br />

average 90.3 9.7<br />

significance χ 2 = 1.879 P ≤ 0.05<br />

bad 94.6 5.4<br />

Cow BCS suitable 92.5 7.5<br />

more than enough 73.3 26.7<br />

average 92.0 8.0<br />

significance χ 2 = 7.883 P ≤ 0.05


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding... 35<br />

the reproduction cycle. Some authors<br />

also show the strong correlation between<br />

BCS and animal body weight as well as<br />

BCS and reproduction results in beef<br />

cattle herds. Cows <strong>of</strong> the different BCS<br />

notes show heat signs in the different<br />

time after the previous calving. It means,<br />

that BCS just before calving has the<br />

influence on readiness to the next pregnancy,<br />

which consequently influences<br />

reproduction indicies <strong>of</strong> the cow (Whitman<br />

et al., 1975). Higher BCS score<br />

before calving influences the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> pregnancies in 40th and 60th day<br />

after delivery (Corah, 1989). According<br />

to Nogalski (2004b) cows’ BCS evaluated<br />

as „more than enough” causes the<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> difficulties during the delivery.<br />

It is especially confirmed for heifers’<br />

deliveries (Bellows et al., 1990; Pogorzelska<br />

et al., 1999; Pogorzelska, Szarek, 2002;<br />

Philipsson, 1976a; Nogalski, 2002).<br />

The most difficult calvings were<br />

observed when cows’ BCS was classified<br />

as “more than enough”. Difficult<br />

calvings constituted 100% <strong>of</strong> Blonde<br />

d’Aquitaine deliveries, 20% <strong>–</strong> Charolaise<br />

and 26.7% <strong>–</strong> Limousine. Cows’ feeding,<br />

especially in the high pregnancy period,<br />

has direct impact on calving quality.<br />

Periodical feedstuff shortages as well as<br />

bed balancing <strong>of</strong> the ration (protein to<br />

energy ration) may cause the increase <strong>of</strong><br />

assisted deliveries. The best cow feeding<br />

welfare index is described by the Body<br />

Condition Scoring (BCS) method.<br />

In Table 6 calving course ratio depending<br />

on calf body weight at birth was<br />

shown. It was a surprise, that delivery<br />

course was not significantly influenced<br />

by calf body weight at birth, but the most<br />

deliveries needing assistance were when<br />

the calf body weight at birth was over<br />

40 kg. Obtained results are confirmed<br />

TABLE 6. Calving course ratio depending on calf body weight at birth<br />

Breed<br />

Trait<br />

easy<br />

Calving course (%)<br />

difficult<br />

Blonde d’Aquitaine<br />

Charolaise<br />

Limousine<br />

≤ 35 94.4 5.6<br />

calf body weight at<br />

birth (kg)<br />

36<strong>–</strong>40 95.2 4.8<br />

> 40 86.4 13.6<br />

average 91.3 8.8<br />

significance<br />

χ 2 = 2.405 bot significant<br />

calf body weight at<br />

birth (kg)<br />

≤ 35 97.8 2.2<br />

36<strong>–</strong>40 91.4 8.6<br />

> 40 73.9 26.1<br />

average 90.3 9.7<br />

significance χ 2 = 9.967 P ≤ 0.01<br />

calf body weight at<br />

birth (kg)<br />

≤ 35 97.4 2.6<br />

36<strong>–</strong>40 91.5 8.5<br />

> 40 83.8 16.2<br />

average 92.8 8.0<br />

significance χ 2 = 6.465 P ≤ 0.05


36 H. Grodzki, T. Przysucha, J. Slósarz<br />

by many authors (Brzozowski, 1985;<br />

Wroński et al., 1996; Colburn et al.,<br />

1997; Pogorzelska et al., 1999; Stąporek,<br />

Ziemiński, 2000; Nogalski, 2002;<br />

Philipsson, 1976c; Malinowski et al.,<br />

1983; Colburn et al., 1997; Brzozowski<br />

et al., 1998; Nogalski, 2003; Przysucha<br />

et al., 2005a; Holland, Odde, 1992; Przysucha<br />

et al., 2002; Przysucha et al., 2004;<br />

Philipsson, 1976b; Miciński et al., 2000;<br />

Przysucha i in., 2004; Thompson, Wiltbank,<br />

1983).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Summarizing, it should be stated, that:<br />

• Significant (Limousine) or highly<br />

significant (Charolaise) influence <strong>of</strong><br />

calving number on delivery quality<br />

was proved, but in case <strong>of</strong> cows mated<br />

to Blonde d’Aquitaine bulls there was<br />

no statistically significant influence<br />

in the group <strong>of</strong> adult cows, but it was<br />

observed in case <strong>of</strong> heifers and young<br />

cows giving birth for the second time.<br />

• The most difficult calvings were observed<br />

when cows’ BCS was classified<br />

as “more than enough”. Difficult<br />

calvings constituted 100% <strong>of</strong> Blonde<br />

d’Aquitaine deliveries, 20% <strong>–</strong> Charolaise<br />

and 26.7% <strong>–</strong> Limousine. Cows’<br />

feeding, especially in the high pregnancy<br />

period, has direct impact on<br />

calving quality. Periodical feedstuff<br />

shortages as well as bed balancing <strong>of</strong><br />

the ration (protein to energy ration)<br />

may cause the increase <strong>of</strong> assisted deliveries.<br />

The best cow feeding welfare<br />

index is described by the Body Condition<br />

Scoring (BCS) method.<br />

• Delivery course was not significantly<br />

influenced by calf body weight at<br />

birth, but the most deliveries needing<br />

assistance were when the calf body<br />

weight at birth was over 40 kg.<br />

• The obtained results show the extraordinary<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> the examined<br />

French beef breeds for commercial<br />

crossing with the dairy cows.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ALBERA A., CARNIER P., GROEN A.F., 2004:<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> a breeding goal for the Piemontese<br />

breed: economic and biological values and<br />

their sensitivity to production circumstances.<br />

Livest. Prod. Sci. 89, 66<strong>–</strong>77.<br />

BELLOWS R.A., SHORT G.P., KITTO G.P.,<br />

STAIGMILLER R.B., MAC NEIL M.D.,<br />

1990: Influence <strong>of</strong> sire, sex <strong>of</strong> fetus and type <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy on conceptus development. Theriogenology<br />

34, 941<strong>–</strong>954.<br />

BERGER P.J., 1994: Genetic prediction for calving<br />

ease in the United States: Data, models<br />

and use by the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 77:<br />

1146<strong>–</strong>1153.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., 1985: Wstępne obserwacje<br />

nad przebiegiem ocieleń u krów rasy ncb. Med.<br />

Wet. 3, 174<strong>–</strong>176.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., REKLEWSKA B., ZDZIAR-<br />

SKI K., 1998: Zależność między przebiegiem<br />

porodów a wymiarami ciała cieląt pochodzących<br />

z krzyżowania rotacyjnego. Pr. Mater.<br />

Zootech. 52, 61<strong>–</strong>69.<br />

COLBURN J., DEUTSCHER H.G., NIELSEN<br />

K.M., ADAMS C.D., 1997: Effects <strong>of</strong> sire,<br />

dam traits, calf traits and environment on dystocia<br />

and subsequent reproduction <strong>of</strong> two-year-<br />

-old heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 1452<strong>–</strong>1460.<br />

CORAH L.R., 1989: Low calf nutrition. Agri-<br />

-Practice 10, 27.<br />

GRODZKI H. [red.], 2009: Chów bydła mięsnego.<br />

Wielkopolskie Wydawnictwo Rolnicze,<br />

Poznań, 1<strong>–</strong>184.<br />

HOLLAND D.M., ODDE G.K., 1992: Factors<br />

affecting calving birth weight. A review. Theriogenology<br />

38, 769<strong>–</strong>798.<br />

KRZYWDA W., SZAREK J., GIL Z., ADAM-<br />

CZYK K., BULECA J., 2002: Charakterystyka<br />

wycieleń krów rasy Limousine hodowanych<br />

w Polsce. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech. Supl., 15,<br />

209<strong>–</strong>212.<br />

MALINOWSKI E., KRZYŻANOWSKI J.,<br />

MURAWSKI J., WRONA Z., ORLIK S.,


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> commercial crossbreeding... 37<br />

1983: Przegląd przypadków ciężkich porodów<br />

u krów. Med. Wet. 39, 6, 367<strong>–</strong>369.<br />

MEYER C.L., BERGER P.J., KOEHLER K.J.,<br />

2000: Interactions among factors affecting<br />

stillbirth in Holstein cattle in the United States.<br />

J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2657<strong>–</strong>2663.<br />

MICIŃSKI J., KLUPCZYŃSKI J., NOGALSKI<br />

Z., 2000: Wpływ wybranych czynników genetyczno-środowiskowych<br />

na kształtowanie się<br />

masy ciała cieląt rasy limousine. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Prz. Hod. 51, 273<strong>–</strong>283.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2002: Effect <strong>of</strong> selected factors<br />

on the course <strong>of</strong> parturition in holstein-fresian<br />

heifers. Journal <strong>of</strong> Polish Agricultural Universities,<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Husbandry, 5, 2 http://www.<br />

ejpau.media.pl/series/volume5/issue2/animal/<br />

art-03.html<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2003: Relations between the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> parturition, body weights and measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> Holstein-Friesian calves. Czech J.<br />

Anim. Sci. 48, 2, 51<strong>–</strong>59.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004a: Wpływ wieku przy pierwszym<br />

wycieleniu na efektywność użytkowania<br />

krów rasy holsztyńsko-fryzyjskiej. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Prz. Hod. 72, 1, 77<strong>–</strong>83.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004b: Tempo wzrostu jałówek<br />

rasy czarno-białej a ich wymiary ciała i przebieg<br />

porodu. Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod. 74, 165<strong>–</strong>173.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004c: Zootechniczne uwarunkowania<br />

jakości porodu jałówek i krów czarnobiałych.<br />

Rozpr. i Monogr. 101, UWM Olsztyn.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., KLUPCZYŃSKI J., 1999: Przebieg<br />

wycieleń, wielkość i żywotność cieląt<br />

w stadzie bydła mięsnego w Mielnie. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. Prz. Hod. 44, 353<strong>–</strong>363.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976a: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. VI. Effects <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand. 27, 58<strong>–</strong>64.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976b: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in<br />

Swedish cattle breeds. V. Effects <strong>of</strong> calving<br />

performance and stillbirth in Swedish Friesian<br />

heifers on productivity in the subsequent lactation.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand. 26, 230<strong>–</strong>234.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976c: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. II. Effects on Non-genetic<br />

factors. Acta Agric. Scand. 26, 165<strong>–</strong>174.<br />

POGORZELSKA J. KIJAK Z., TARCZYŃSKI<br />

R., 1999: Analiza użytkowania rozpłodowego<br />

i wyniki odchowu potomstwa rasy hereford<br />

importowanego z Danii. Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod.<br />

44, 389<strong>–</strong>395.<br />

POGORZELSKA J., SZAREK J., 2002: Porównanie<br />

wyników rozrodu krów i odchowu cieląt<br />

w stadzie rasy hereford utrzymywanych w różnych<br />

warunkach środowiskowych. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Prz. Hod. 62, 193<strong>–</strong>202.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., CZARNECKI VEL SARNE-<br />

CKI M., GRODZKI H., ZDZIARSKI K., 2002:<br />

Analiza wpływu wybranych czynników na<br />

masę ciała i przyrosty dobowe cieląt rasy angus.<br />

Rocz. Nauk. Zootech. Supl., 15, 225<strong>–</strong>230.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., BRZOZOW-<br />

SKI P., ZDZIARSKI K., 2005a: Wpływ wybranych<br />

czynników na przebieg porodów krów<br />

rasy limousin. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 61 (9),<br />

1036<strong>–</strong>1038.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., NAŁĘCZ-<br />

TARWACKA T., SLÓSARZ J., 2004: Calving<br />

number as a factor influencing the further performance<br />

results <strong>of</strong> different beef breed calves.<br />

Scientifi c Messenger <strong>of</strong> Lviv National Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Veterinary Medicine named after S.Z Gzhytskyj<br />

6, 3, 5, 124<strong>–</strong>129.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ J.,<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., 2006: Przebieg<br />

porodów krów włoskiej rasy Piemontese w zależności<br />

od masy krowy, kolejności i sezonu<br />

ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia. Acta Sci.<br />

Pol. Zootech. 52, 87<strong>–</strong>94.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ<br />

J., 2005b: Rodzaj porodów krów mięsnych<br />

ras brytyjskich w zależności od masy krowy,<br />

kolejności ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia.<br />

Roczniki Naukowe PTZ, 1, 1, 145<strong>–</strong>150.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ J.,<br />

WRÓBLEWSKA L., 2005c: Wpływ masy krowy,<br />

kolejności ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia<br />

na rodzaj porodu krów rasy charolais. Rocz.<br />

Nauk. Zoot., z. 22/2, 597<strong>–</strong>600.<br />

RICHARDS M.W., SPITZER J.C., WARNER<br />

M.B., 1986: Effect <strong>of</strong> varying levels <strong>of</strong> postpartum<br />

nutrition and body condition at calving on<br />

subsequent reproductive performance in beef<br />

cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 62, 300<strong>–</strong>306.<br />

SELK G.E., WETTEMANN R.P., LUSBY K.S.,<br />

RASBY R.J., 1986: The importance <strong>of</strong> body<br />

condition at calving on reproduction in beef<br />

cows. OSO Agric. Exp. Sta. Publ. 118, 3163<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>3169.


38 H. Grodzki, T. Przysucha, J. Slósarz<br />

SIEBER M., FREEMAN A.E., KELLEY D.H.,<br />

1989: Effects <strong>of</strong> body measurements and<br />

weight on calf size and calving difficulty <strong>of</strong><br />

Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 9, 2402<strong>–</strong>2410.<br />

STĄPOREK K., ZIEMIŃSKI R., 2000: Hodowla<br />

bydła rasy limousine w zachodniej Polsce.<br />

Przegląd Hodowlany 7, 3<strong>–</strong>5.<br />

THOMSON D.B, WILTBANK J.N., 1983: Dystocia<br />

in relationship to shape <strong>of</strong> pelvic opening<br />

in Holstein heifers. Theriogenology 20, 6,<br />

683<strong>–</strong>692.<br />

WHITMAN R.W., REMMENGA E.E., WIL-<br />

TBANK J.N., 1975: Weight change, condition<br />

and beef cow reproduction. J. Anim. Sci. 41,<br />

387<strong>–</strong>394.<br />

WILTBANK J.N., 1983: Maintenance <strong>of</strong> high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> reproductive performance in beef cow<br />

herd. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Large Anim. Proc. 5,<br />

41<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

WRONA Z., KRZYŻANOWSKI J., KRAKOW-<br />

SKI L., ŹREBIEC G., 2001: Przebieg porodów<br />

u krzyżówek mięsnych bydła rasy polskiej<br />

czarno-białej i piemonckiej. Med. Wet. 57 6,<br />

420<strong>–</strong>422.<br />

WROŃSKI M., KIJAK Z., MICIŃSKI J., 1996:<br />

Charakterystyka pierwszego w Polsce stada<br />

bydła mięsnego rasy Limousine. Zesz.Nauk.<br />

AR we Wrocławiu XII, 291, 193<strong>–</strong>203.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ wybranych czynników na<br />

przebieg porodów w krzyżowaniu towarowym<br />

krów cb z buhajami francuskich ras mięsnych<br />

(blonde d’aquitaine, charolaise, limousine). Celem<br />

prezentowanej pracy było określenie wpływu<br />

wybranych czynników, takich jak: wiek krowy,<br />

kolejność ocielenia, kondycja krowy, płeć cielęcia<br />

oraz masa cielęcia przy urodzeniu na przebieg porodów<br />

w krzyżowaniu towarowym krów cb z buhajami<br />

francuskich ras mięsnych. Stwierdzono<br />

statystycznie istotny wpływ numeru ocielenia na<br />

przebieg porodu krów krytych nasieniem buhajów<br />

ras charolaise i limousine. Takiego wpływu nie<br />

stwierdzono w przypadku rasy blonde d’aquitaine,<br />

ale więcej trudnych porodów było w grupie pierwiastek<br />

i krów cielących się po raz drugi. U krów,<br />

których kondycję oceniono jako „zbyt dobrą”, obserwowano<br />

wysoki udział trudnych ocieleń, tj. dla<br />

rasy blonde d’aquitaine <strong>–</strong> 100%, dla charolaise <strong>–</strong><br />

20% i dla limousine 26,7%. Istotny wpływ masy<br />

ciała cielęcia przy urodzeniu na rodzaj porodu<br />

potwierdzono dla ras charolaise i limousine. Dla<br />

rasy blonde d’aquitaine zależność ta okazała się<br />

statystycznie nieistotna, ale najwięcej trudnych<br />

porodów wymagających asysty hodowcy, zaobserwowano<br />

przy masie cielęcia przekraczającej<br />

40 kg. Uzyskane w prezentowanej pracy wyniki<br />

potwierdzają wybitną przydatność francuskich<br />

ras mięsnych do krzyżowania towarowego z krowami<br />

mlecznymi.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: henryk_grodzki@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 39<strong>–</strong>44<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Microsatellite polymorphism in the study <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> an experimental flock <strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani breed<br />

GRUSZCZYŃSKA JOANNA 1 , ŁUKASIEWICZ MONIKA 2<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Microsatellite polymorphism in the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> an experimental fl ock<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani breed. Blood samples were collected<br />

from pterygoidal vein <strong>of</strong> 53 birds (29 cocks<br />

and 24 hens) come from the experimental flock<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani hens and underwent molecular<br />

analysis. The phenol-chlor<strong>of</strong>orm method was used<br />

to extract genomic DNA from collected blood. Microsatellite<br />

sequences have been commonly used<br />

in molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> animal origin. On the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> literature, 5 microsatellite sequences were<br />

chosen for further molecular analysis: MCW0210,<br />

MCW0184, LEI0071, MCW0145 and ADL0306.<br />

The automatic sequencer ALF Express (Pharmacia<br />

LKB) was used to genotype birds. Among<br />

all examined loci polymorphism was detected.<br />

Approximate analyzed microsatellite sequences<br />

lengths were: 156<strong>–</strong>168bp for MCW0210 (3 alleles);<br />

240 and 260bp for MCW0184; 280<strong>–</strong>300bp<br />

for LEI0071 (3 alleles); 206<strong>–</strong>218bp for MCW0145<br />

(4 alleles) and 119<strong>–</strong>125bp for ADL0306 (3 alleles).<br />

The highest level <strong>of</strong> homozygosity was found as<br />

follows for MCW0184 (about 81%), the lowest<br />

one for ADL0306 (4%). The high level <strong>of</strong> H O<br />

(0.19<strong>–</strong>0.96), H E (0.41<strong>–</strong>0.64) and PIC (0.32<strong>–</strong>0.56)<br />

were calculated and compared as not so high according<br />

to other scientific reports.<br />

Key words: Ayam Cemani breed, microsatellite<br />

sequences, genetic diversity.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Microsatellite sequences are commonly<br />

exploited in investigations addressing the<br />

structure and genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> populations.<br />

Owing to their high polymorphism<br />

and co-dominant inheritance, they are<br />

applied for genome mapping and for<br />

plotting genetic maps.<br />

Ayam cemani is an original local breed<br />

from the province <strong>of</strong> Central Java (Indonesia).<br />

The word “cemani” in Java language<br />

means “completely black”, whereas<br />

“ayam” means hen. The characteristic<br />

feature <strong>of</strong> this breed is the black colour<br />

<strong>of</strong> body, comb, bells, beak, eyeballs, skin,<br />

tarsi, and black internal organs, bones<br />

and muscles. The mentioned birds are<br />

utilized for egg and meat production as<br />

well as in medicine and in religious rituals<br />

(Muryanto, 1991; Iskandar, Saepudin,<br />

2005). In Europe, they are considered as<br />

decorative breed.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the current study was, to<br />

conduct genetic characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

investigated experimental flock <strong>of</strong> Ayam<br />

Cemani chicken breed, and to evaluate<br />

the usefulness microsatellite markers to<br />

assess genetic diversity.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Characterisic <strong>of</strong> microsatellite<br />

sequences<br />

For the molecular analysis we used blood<br />

samples from pterygoidal vein <strong>of</strong> 53 birds


40 J. Gruszczyńska, M. Łukasiewicz<br />

(29 cocks and 24 hens) from the experimental<br />

flock <strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani hens. The<br />

experiment was conducted at the Poultry<br />

Farm <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Live<br />

<strong>Sciences</strong> in Obory. Genomic DNA was<br />

extracted from the blood by phenol-chlor<strong>of</strong>orm<br />

extraction. The presence and the<br />

purity <strong>of</strong> isolated DNA was checked on a<br />

NanoDropp spectrophotometer (Thermo<br />

Scientific).<br />

Five microsatellite sequences were<br />

used as a tool to determine genetic diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the bird population examined. Owing to<br />

the specific character <strong>of</strong> the experiment,<br />

in molecular analysis the microsatellite<br />

sequences were selected so as to be<br />

linked with the body weight <strong>of</strong> the hens.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> literature, 5 microsatellite<br />

sequences were chosen as follows:<br />

MCW0145, MCW0184, MCW0210,<br />

LEI0071, and ADL0306 (Atzmon et al.,<br />

1998; Weissmann et al., 1998).<br />

PCR amplification<br />

Five pairs <strong>of</strong> primers <strong>of</strong> microsatellite<br />

sequences were selected from the Roslin<br />

Institute chicken mapping database<br />

ArkDB (http://www.thearkdb.org).<br />

Forward primers were labelled with Cy5<br />

marker. The reaction mixture comprised<br />

primers each at 20ppmol, dNTP MIX,<br />

1.0 unit <strong>of</strong> Taq polymerase (Sigma) per<br />

24 μl reaction mixture, 1 ng template<br />

genomic DNA (prepared from red blood<br />

cells) in each reaction mixture, and 5 μl<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10x reaction buffer (100 mM Tris<br />

HCl, 15mM MgCl2, 50mM KCl, 0.01%<br />

gelatin). The cycling temperature was as<br />

follows: denaturation was run at 95 o C<br />

for 30 s; annealing was run for 60 s at<br />

46 o C for LEI0071, 47 o C for ADL0306,<br />

51 o C for MCW0210 and MCW0145,<br />

and 56 o C for MCW0184, depending on<br />

primer composition; extension war run<br />

at 72 o C for 60s.The reaction was carried<br />

out for 30 cycles. The final extension<br />

was run at 72 o C for 10 min. The conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> polymerase chain reaction (PCR)<br />

were employed as earlier established by<br />

Gruszczyńska and Michalska (2005) and<br />

by Gruszczyńska et al. (2007).<br />

The birds were genotyped, using an<br />

automatic sequencer ALF Express (Pharmacia<br />

LKB).<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the molecular analysis were<br />

used to estimate the frequency <strong>of</strong> alleles <strong>of</strong><br />

the analyzed loci, frequency <strong>of</strong> genotypes<br />

(homo- and heterozygotes), expected<br />

heterozygosity H E (Ott, 1992), and to<br />

determine the Polymorphic Information<br />

Content PIC (Botstein et al., 1980). The<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> alleles, H O (observed heterozygosity),<br />

H E (expected heterozygosity)<br />

and PIC (polymorphic information<br />

content) were computed using Cervus<br />

3.0.3. s<strong>of</strong>tware (Kalinowski et al., 2007),<br />

whereas the frequency <strong>of</strong> genotypes <strong>–</strong> with<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> an original ALFREQ s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(Tereba Z., Tereba A., 2005).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

In the analyzed population <strong>of</strong> Ayam<br />

Cemani breed hens the polymorphism<br />

within all <strong>of</strong> 5 selected microsatellite<br />

sequences. The lengths <strong>of</strong> the sequences<br />

were: 156<strong>–</strong>168bp for MCW0210; 240 and<br />

260bp for MCW0184; 280<strong>–</strong>300bp for<br />

LEI0071; 206<strong>–</strong>218bp for MCW0145, and<br />

119<strong>–</strong>125bp for ADL0306 (Tab. 1). The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> alleles was ranging from 2 for<br />

MCW0184 sequence to 4 for MCW0145<br />

sequence. Within particular microsatellite<br />

loci we observed the following


Microsatellite polymorphism in the study... 41<br />

alleles with the highest frequency:<br />

locus MCW0210 <strong>–</strong> allele 166bp (0.66);<br />

MCW0184<strong>–</strong>240bp; LEI0071<strong>–</strong>300bp;<br />

MCW0145<strong>–</strong>206bp; and ADL0306<strong>–</strong>121bp<br />

(Tab. 1).<br />

Table 2 presents the frequency <strong>of</strong> genotypes<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> the 5 microsatellite<br />

sequences analyzed in the experimental<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani breed hens.<br />

The most frequent genotype in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

MCW0210, LEI0071, MCW0145 and<br />

ADL0306 sequences were heterozygotes<br />

(156bp/166bp; 290bp/300bp; 206bp/214bp;<br />

119bp/121bp, respectively), whereas in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> MCW0184 sequence <strong>–</strong> homozygote<br />

240pb/240bp (0.623) (Tab. 2).<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> alleles in the examined<br />

microsatellite sequences determined<br />

in hens <strong>of</strong> the Ayam Cemani breed was<br />

lower (Tab. 1) than that reported for other<br />

breeds by other authors (Tab. 3). In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the MCW0210 sequence, when<br />

analyzing broiler chickens Crooijmans<br />

et al., 1997 and Weissmann et al., 1998<br />

reported over 5 alleles, whereas in locus<br />

MCW0184 and locus LEI0071 they<br />

determined respectively 6 and 7 alleles<br />

(Crooijmans et al., 1997). In turn, 8 alleles<br />

were reported by Crooijmans et al.<br />

(1996) in broiler chickens and 7 alleles by<br />

Tadano et al. (2007a; 2007b) in Japanese<br />

long-tailed chickens (12 breeds <strong>of</strong> hens)<br />

TABLE 1. Frequency <strong>of</strong> alleles <strong>of</strong> the microsatellite sequences examined in the experimental population<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani breed hens (n = 53)<br />

MCW0145 MCW0184 MCW0210 LEI0071 ADL0306<br />

Allele (bp)<br />

Frequency<br />

Allele (bp)<br />

Frequency<br />

Allele (bp)<br />

206 0.547 240 0.717 156 0.292 280 0.028 119 0.292<br />

212 0.132 246 0.283 166 0.660 290 0.453 121 0.472<br />

214 0.311 168 0.047 300 0.519 125 0.236<br />

218 0.009<br />

Frequency<br />

Allele (bp)<br />

Frequency<br />

Allele (bp)<br />

Frequency<br />

TABLE 2. Frequency <strong>of</strong> genotypes in respect <strong>of</strong> the 5 microsatellite sequences analyzed in the experimental<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Ayam Cemani breed hens (n = 53)<br />

MCW0210 MCW0145 MCW0184 MCW0210 LEI0071 ADL0306<br />

Genotype<br />

bp/bp<br />

Frequency<br />

Genotype<br />

bp/bp<br />

Frequency<br />

Genotype<br />

bp/bp<br />

Frequency<br />

Genotype<br />

bp/bp<br />

Frequency<br />

Genotype<br />

bp/bp<br />

206/206 0.226 240/240 0.623 156/166 0.566 280/290 0.019 119/119 0.038<br />

206/212 0.113 240/246 0.189 156/168 0.019 280/300 0.038 119/121 0.491<br />

206/214 0.528 246/246 0.189 166/166 0.340 290/290 0.208 119/125 0.019<br />

212/212 0.038 166/168 0.075 290/300 0.472 121/125 0.453<br />

212/214 0.075 300/300 0.264<br />

214/218 0.019<br />

Frequency


42 J. Gruszczyńska, M. Łukasiewicz<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the MCW0145 sequence,<br />

whereas Wardęcka et al. (2002) reported<br />

3 alleles in each ivestigated breed (156bp<br />

and 206bp both for Green-Legged and<br />

Rhode Island Red<strong>–</strong>RIR, 196bp<strong>–</strong>typical<br />

<strong>of</strong> Green-Legged Partrigenous, 202bp<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>typical <strong>of</strong> RIR). In broiler chickens,<br />

Weissmann et al. (1998) showed 4 alleles<br />

in locus ADL0306. The length <strong>of</strong> alleles<br />

noted in Ayam Cemani hens was similar<br />

to that reported for other breeds (Tab. 3).<br />

However, in terms <strong>of</strong> the selected microsatellite<br />

sequence, some new alleles<br />

have been found in the examined population<br />

<strong>of</strong> hens, i.e. in locus MCW0145<br />

these were 214bp and 218bp alleles and<br />

in locus ADL0306 these were 119bp and<br />

125bp alleles (Tab. 3).<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> alleles <strong>of</strong> the microsatellite<br />

sequences determined in the<br />

studied population enabled determining<br />

indices <strong>of</strong> observed (H O ) and expected<br />

(H E ) heterozygosity as well as the polymorphic<br />

index (PIC). Values <strong>of</strong> the H E<br />

ranged from 0.41 to 0.64, and these <strong>of</strong><br />

the PIC index were slightly lower (Tab.<br />

4). Other authors reported higher values<br />

(ca. 0.7) <strong>of</strong> these indices (Lujiang et al.,<br />

2006; Tadano et al., 2007b). The highest<br />

percentage (81%) <strong>of</strong> homozygotes was<br />

reported in the terms <strong>of</strong> the MCW0184<br />

sequence, while the lowest (4%) in terms<br />

TABLE 3. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> 5 selected microsatellite sequences in Ayam Cemani and other chicken<br />

breeds<br />

Microsatellite<br />

sequence<br />

Sequence<br />

localization<br />

in chromosome<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

domestic<br />

hen<br />

Ayam<br />

Cemani in<br />

this study<br />

length <strong>of</strong><br />

alleles (bp)<br />

number<br />

<strong>of</strong> alleles<br />

8 a)<br />

3 i)<br />

3 i)<br />

8 g)<br />

7 h)<br />

4 f)<br />

4 f)<br />

2 d)<br />

length <strong>of</strong> alleles<br />

(bp)<br />

Other authors<br />

2 k) 186; 195<br />

164<strong>–</strong>212<br />

156; 202; 206<br />

MCW0145 1<br />

156; 196; 206<br />

206;<br />

181<strong>–</strong>209<br />

212;<br />

189<strong>–</strong>211<br />

214;<br />

164; 192; 203; 207<br />

218<br />

192; 203; 205; 210<br />

186; 195<br />

MCW0184 2 240; 246 6 b) 240<strong>–</strong>293 Broiler<br />

MCW0210 5<br />

156;166; 4 b) 152<strong>–</strong>186<br />

Broiler<br />

168 4 j) 148; 152; 156; 160 Broiler<br />

LEI0071 1<br />

7<br />

280;<br />

281<strong>–</strong>330<br />

Broiler<br />

8<br />

290;<br />

214; 224; 230; 277; Broiler<br />

308; 310; 318; 327<br />

300<br />

1 c) 263<br />

ISA lines<br />

ADL0306 3<br />

119;121; 4 j) 110; 113; 117; 121<br />

125 1 e) 127<br />

line or breed or type<br />

<strong>of</strong> chicken<br />

Broiler<br />

Rhode Island Red<br />

Green-Legged Partrigenous<br />

Japanese long-tailed<br />

Japanese long-tailed<br />

Broiler<br />

Layer<br />

Guangxi Three-yellow<br />

Qingyuan Partridge<br />

Broiler<br />

NicholasCommercial line<br />

a)<br />

Crooijmans et al. (1996); b) Crooijmans et al. (1997); c) Gibbs et al. (1997); d) Li et al. (2009); e) Reed<br />

et al. (2000); f) Rosario et al. (2009); g) Tadano et al. (2007a); h) Tadano et al. (2007b); i) Wardęcka et al.<br />

(2002); j) Weissmann et al. (1998); k) Zou et al. (2010)


Microsatellite polymorphism in the study... 43<br />

TABLE 4. Values <strong>of</strong> observed heterozygosity<br />

(Ho), expected heterozygosity (H E ) and polymorphic<br />

content index (PIC) for the microsatellite<br />

sequences analyzed in the population <strong>of</strong> Ayam<br />

Cemani breed hens<br />

Locus<br />

Indices<br />

H O H E PIC<br />

MCW0145 0.736 0.592 0.514<br />

MCW0184 0.189 0.410 0.323<br />

MCW0210 0.660 0.481 0.399<br />

LEI0071 0.528 0.530 0.414<br />

ADL0306 0.962 0.642 0.564<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ADL0306 sequence (Tab. 4).<br />

The test <strong>of</strong> conformity to Hardy-Weinberg<br />

distribution revealed in the studied<br />

population a significant (p ≤ 0.05) and<br />

highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) lack <strong>of</strong><br />

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> MCW0201 and ADL0306 sequence,<br />

respectively.<br />

In summary it is obvious that microsatellite<br />

sequences investigated in hens <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ayam Cemani breed were polymorphic.<br />

The values obtained for expected heterozygosity<br />

(H E ), observed heterozygosity<br />

(H O ), and Polymorphic Information Content<br />

(PIC) confirm usability <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />

microsatellite sequences as markers being<br />

a convenient tool in the genetic diversity<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the hen population.<br />

Our results will be useful to compare the<br />

informativeness <strong>of</strong> microsatellite markers<br />

with other studies and help other investigators<br />

interested in using the chicken microsatellite<br />

markers in the study <strong>of</strong> genetics<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> examined population.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ATZMON G., BAXTER-JONES C., YONASH<br />

N., CHENG H., AVIDAN N., LAVI U., CA-<br />

HANER A., HILLEL J., 1998: Microsatellite<br />

markers associated with quantitative traits in<br />

broilers. Proceedings, 10th European Poultry<br />

Conference”The Poultry Industry Towards the<br />

21st Centry”, Jerusalem Israel, 21<strong>–</strong>26 June, 1:<br />

191<strong>–</strong>194.<br />

BOTSTEIN D., WHITE R.L., SKOLNICK M.,<br />

DAVIS R.W., 1980: Construction <strong>of</strong> a genetic<br />

linkage map in man using restriction fragment<br />

length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32:<br />

314<strong>–</strong>331.<br />

CROOIJMANS R.P., DIJKHOF R.J.M., POEL<br />

J.J., GROENEN M.A.M., 1997: New microsatellite<br />

markers in chicken optimized for automate<br />

fluorescent genotyping. Anim. Genet. 28:<br />

427<strong>–</strong>437.<br />

CROOIJMANS R.P., VAN OERS P.A., STRIJK<br />

J.A., VAN DER POEL J.J., GROENEN M.A.,<br />

1996: Preliminary linkage map <strong>of</strong> the chicken<br />

(Gallus domesticus) genome based on 77 microsatellite<br />

markers: 77 new markers mapped.<br />

Poultry Sci. 75: 746<strong>–</strong>754.<br />

GIBBS M. DAWSON D.A., McCAMLEY C.,<br />

WARDLE A.F., ARMOUR J.A.L., BURKE T.,<br />

1997: Chicken microsatellite markers isolated<br />

from libraries enriched for simple tandem<br />

repeats. Anim Genet. 28: 401<strong>–</strong>417.<br />

GRUSZCZYŃSKA J., MICHALSKA E., 2005:<br />

The Rusing <strong>of</strong> the chicken microsatellite markers<br />

In the study <strong>of</strong> genetics diversity <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Japanese quail (Coturnix<br />

japonica). Materiały konferencyjne XVII Międzynarodowe<br />

Sympozjum Drobiarskie (PO<br />

WPSA) Kiekrz 6<strong>–</strong>8.09.2005: 26.<br />

GRUSZCZYŃSKA J., MICHALSKA E., PRZY-<br />

BYLAK M., 2007: Wykorzystanie sekwencji<br />

mikrosatelitarnych z genomu kury domowej<br />

(Gallus gallus) w badaniach molekularnych<br />

u przepiórki japońskiej (Coturnix japonica)<br />

Materiały Konferencyjne,. II Polski Kongres<br />

Genetyki, Warszawa 18<strong>–</strong>20.09.2007.<br />

ISKANDAR S., DAN SAEPUDIN Y., 2005:<br />

Germplasm, Cemani chicken (qualitative characteristics,<br />

quantitative characteristics, breeding<br />

procedure, preservation and research efforts).<br />

www.balitnak.litbang.deptan.go.id<br />

KALINOWSKI S.T, TAPER M.L., MARSHALL<br />

T.C., 2007: Revising how the computer program<br />

CERVUS accommodates genotyping error<br />

increases success in paternity assignment. Mol.<br />

Ecol. 16: 1099<strong>–</strong>1006.<br />

LI HUI-FANG, SHU JING-TING, SONG<br />

WEI-TAO, CHEN KUAN-WEI, 2009: Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> genetic diversity in Qingyuan Partridge


44 J. Gruszczyńska, M. Łukasiewicz<br />

Chickens based on microsatellite markers. J.<br />

Anim. Vet. Adv. 8: 454<strong>–</strong>458.<br />

LUJIANG Q., GUIFANG X., KUANWEI C.,<br />

HONGJIE Y., LONGCHAO Z., GUIQIN W.,<br />

ZHUOCHENG H., GUIYUN X., NING Y.,<br />

2006: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity in Chinese<br />

indigenous chicken breeds using microsatellite<br />

markers. Science in China Series C: <strong>Life</strong><br />

<strong>Sciences</strong> 49: 332<strong>–</strong>341.<br />

MURYANTO S., 1991: Further abort Cemani chicken.<br />

Indonesian Poultry Magazine No 132/th<br />

XII: 16<strong>–</strong>20.<br />

OTT J., 1992: Strategies for characterizing highly<br />

polymorphic markers in human gene mapping.<br />

Am. J. Human Genet. 51: 283<strong>–</strong>290.<br />

REED K.M., MENDOZA K.M., BEATTIE C.W.,<br />

2000: Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> microsatellite<br />

loci in chicken and turkey. Genome 43: 796<strong>–</strong>802.<br />

Roslin Institute, ArkDB <strong>–</strong> http://www.thearkdb.<br />

org<br />

ROSARIO M.F., LEDUR M.C., MOURA<br />

A.S.A.T., COUTINHO L.L., GARCIA A.A.F.,<br />

2009: Genotypic characterization <strong>of</strong> microsatellite<br />

markers in broiler and layer selected<br />

chicken lines and their reciprocal F1s. Sci.<br />

Agric (Piracicaba, Braz.) 66: 150<strong>–</strong>158.<br />

TADANO R., NISHIBORI M., NAGASAKA<br />

N., TSUDZUKI M., 2007a: Assessing genetic<br />

diversity and population structure for commercial<br />

chicken lines based on forty microsatellite<br />

analyses, Poultry Sci. 86: 2301<strong>–</strong>2308.<br />

TADANO R., SEKINO M., NISHIBORI M.,<br />

TSUDZUKI M., 2007b: Microsatellite markers<br />

analysis for the genetic relationships among<br />

Japanese Long- Tailed Chicken Breeds, Poultry<br />

Sci. 86: 460<strong>–</strong>469.<br />

TEREBA Z., TEREBA A., 2005: ALFREQ s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

WARDĘCKA B, OLSZEWSKI R., JASZCZAK<br />

K., ZIĘBA G., PIERZCHAŁA M., WICIŃSKA<br />

K., 2002: Relationship between microsatellite<br />

marker alleles on chromosomes 1<strong>–</strong>5 originating<br />

from the Rhode Island Red and Greenlegged<br />

Partrigenous breeds and egg production<br />

and quality traits in F2 mapping population J.<br />

Appl. Genet. 43: 319<strong>–</strong>329.<br />

WEISSMANN S., CARMON T., DOUAIRE M.,<br />

CAHANER A., ZEITLIN G., LAVI U., AVI-<br />

DAN N., LECLERCQ B., HILLEL J., 1998:<br />

Marker gene frequencies ithin and between<br />

divergently selected lines for high and low<br />

abdominal fat in chickens. Proceedings, 10th<br />

European Poultry Conference”The Poultry<br />

Industry Towards the 21 st Centry”, Jerusalem<br />

Israel, 21<strong>–</strong>26 June, 1: 280<strong>–</strong>283.<br />

ZOU JIAN-MIN., WEI FENG-YING, SHU<br />

JING-TING, SONG WEI-TAO, HAN WEI,<br />

LI HUI-FANG, 2010: Microsatellite DNA<br />

typing for assessment <strong>of</strong> genetic variability in<br />

Guangxi Three-yellow chickens. J. Anim. Vet.<br />

Adv. 9: 1565<strong>–</strong>1569.<br />

Streszczenie: Do badań krew pobrano z żyły<br />

skrzydłowej od 53 ptaków (29 kogutów i 24 kur)<br />

rasy Ayam Cemani pochodzących ze stada doświadczalnego.<br />

Genomowy DNA izolowano z krwi<br />

metodą fenolowo-chlor<strong>of</strong>ormową. W analizie<br />

molekularnej wykorzystano 5 sekwencji mikrosatelitarnych:<br />

MCW0210, MCW0184, LEI0071,<br />

MCW0145 i ADL0306. Ptaki zgenotypowano<br />

przy wykorzystaniu automatycznego sekwenatora<br />

ALF Express (Pharmacia LKB). Stwierdzono<br />

występowanie polimorfizmu we wszystkich badanych<br />

loci. Długość analizowanych sekwencji<br />

mikrostaelitarnych była następująca: 156-168pz<br />

dla MCW0210 (3 allele); 240pz i 260pz dla<br />

MCW0184; 280-300pz dla LEI0071 (3 allele);<br />

206-218pz dla MCW0145 (4 allele) i 119-125<br />

pz dla ADL0306 (3 allele). Najwyższą homozygotyczność<br />

odnotowano pod względem sekwencji<br />

MCW0184 (około 81%), a najniższą dla<br />

ADL0306 (4%). Wielkość współczynników H o<br />

(0,19-0,96), H E (0,41-0,64) oraz wskaźnika PIC<br />

(0,32-0,56) nie była tak wysoka jak w badaniach<br />

innych autorów.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Joanna Gruszczyńska<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Ogólnej Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

<strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: joanna_gruszczynska@sggw.pl<br />

Monika Łukasiewicz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 45<strong>–</strong>55<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Confiscation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland by custom service<br />

during 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period in accordance with EU law and CITES<br />

TADEUSZ KALETA, ANNA SZYMAŃSKA<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Confiscation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in<br />

Poland by custom service during 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period<br />

in accordance with EU law and CITES. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> provided documentation from the Polish<br />

Custom Service authors examined the confiscation<br />

<strong>of</strong> live animals in Poland during the first period <strong>of</strong><br />

enforcing CITES and EU law. Nearly 8000 animals<br />

from 126 transports were confiscated during<br />

1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period. Poland turned out to be mainly<br />

target country for smuggled animals and animals<br />

were transported predominately from Czech Republic<br />

and Ukraine. Birds and reptiles species<br />

were animals the most frequently uncovered by the<br />

custom <strong>of</strong>ficers The cases <strong>of</strong> smuggling live fishes<br />

and amphibians were not recorded. The greatest<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> confiscated animal in one baggage was<br />

noted in the case <strong>of</strong> chelonians. The pattern <strong>of</strong> illegal<br />

trade was to some degree convergent with the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> Polish online market with<br />

animals performed by NGO PTP “Salamandra”.<br />

Key words: confiscation, live animals, CITES,<br />

Poland.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The world legal market with exotic animal<br />

and plant species is booming and worth at<br />

least 5 bilions $ a year. How worth is illicit<br />

trade is unknown but it may be realistically<br />

estimated at least at the same level<br />

(Fitzgerald, 1989). The trade is diverse<br />

ranging from live organisms to the many<br />

animal products (e.g. ivory, musk, skins,<br />

items for traditional Chinese medicine)<br />

But uncontrolled wildlife trade can have<br />

far <strong>–</strong> reaching ecological repercussions.<br />

As an effect <strong>of</strong> this trade the number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals belonging to various species<br />

exploited by man quickly depleted<br />

aggravating the troubles with the nature<br />

and biodiversity conservation. There are<br />

many facts from around the world supporting<br />

this claim (Oldfield, 2003).<br />

The trade in wildlife is really worldwide.<br />

Therefore, the control <strong>of</strong> it needed<br />

international cooperation <strong>of</strong> exporting and<br />

importing countries. Such was the genesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Convention on International Trade in<br />

Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and<br />

Flora (CITES) originally signed in 1973<br />

by 85 countries. Convention has three<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> protection with Appendix<br />

1 covering the most vulnerable species<br />

(Fitzgerald, 1989). Today in CITES over<br />

5100 species are listed (www.cites.org).<br />

Since European Union has its own law<br />

protecting wildlife it was need to conform<br />

European legislation with CITES agreement.<br />

It resulted in EU Council Regulation<br />

no 338/97 which strongly mitigated<br />

trade in animals covering also some non-<br />

-CITES species protected in Europe (EU<br />

Wildlife Trade Regulation, 1996).<br />

Potentially the situation <strong>of</strong> Poland in<br />

Europe as regards trade in animals is very<br />

important. Poland is the biggest “border<br />

state” <strong>of</strong> European Union bordering


46 T. Kaleta, A. Szymańska<br />

upon post-USSR republics in which legislation<br />

<strong>of</strong> wildlife trade is <strong>of</strong>ten poorly<br />

enforced. These republics are exporters<br />

and re-exporters <strong>of</strong> many animals and<br />

animal products highly prized in the<br />

West. Therefore, Poland may be seen<br />

also as transit country on the route <strong>of</strong><br />

legal and illicit trade in animals.<br />

Although Poland signed CITES in<br />

1989, the real participation in trade control<br />

based on Convention begun ten years<br />

later (Trusiński, 2009). Thus, the good<br />

starting point <strong>of</strong> any analysis <strong>of</strong> custom<br />

service work concerning transported animals<br />

should be this year.<br />

In this study we concerned ourselves<br />

with the number and type <strong>of</strong> confiscation<br />

<strong>of</strong> live animals executed in Poland<br />

by custom service in concordance with<br />

EU law and CITES. The reason <strong>of</strong> preference<br />

<strong>of</strong> live animals over animal products<br />

is the fact <strong>of</strong> growing popularity <strong>of</strong><br />

pet animals (specially exotic species). It<br />

has been recorded already in 20th century<br />

(Serpell, 1996), and has caused many<br />

problems. For example exotic pet trade<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten based on taking animals from<br />

the wild which is harmful for nature conservation<br />

(Fitzgerald, 1989). It should<br />

be noted that EU law imposed ban on<br />

the trade in many live animals devoid<br />

<strong>of</strong> proper documentation. For example<br />

this is the case <strong>of</strong> monkeys and apes,<br />

parrots and parakeets, tortoises crocodilians,<br />

some amphibians and invertebrates<br />

(tarantulas, leeches etc) (EU Wildlife<br />

Trade Regulation, 1996).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHOD<br />

The data concerning confiscation <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals from wildlife species in<br />

Poland during the 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period was<br />

provided by the Department <strong>of</strong> Custom<br />

Service in Polish Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finances.<br />

The reason <strong>of</strong> confiscation was usually<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> special documentation needed<br />

for species covered by CITES and EU<br />

law. This database covered cases <strong>of</strong><br />

confiscations recorded at the frontier<br />

points and at the Custom Office province<br />

headquarters (in Poland custom service<br />

is decentralized). Some data concerned<br />

also confiscation in home market. Place,<br />

date, confiscated species, number <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />

source country and target country<br />

(in the case <strong>of</strong> transit) were recorded in<br />

each case. Only records with full description<br />

were selected to further analysis.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Table 1 focuses on place where the animals<br />

were confiscated. The confiscations<br />

took place at 16 points. They were located<br />

either at the frontier (e.g. Cieszyn) or at<br />

Custom Office province headquarter<br />

(e.g. Wrocław, Cracow). Some confiscations<br />

also took place in Okęcie Airport<br />

in <strong>Warsaw</strong> and during controls in central<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the country. Confiscated animals<br />

arrived from 19 countries (import), in 8<br />

cases Poland was source country (export)<br />

and in two cases there was transit.<br />

In the studied period Cieszyn and<br />

Przemyśl turned out to be frontier posts<br />

where the greater number <strong>of</strong> smuggling<br />

acts was foiled. This fact is in accordance<br />

with the visible trend <strong>of</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> trade<br />

in animals leading to the Polish territory.<br />

As a whole the greater number <strong>of</strong> confiscations<br />

imported animals was noted<br />

at places geographically connected with<br />

the eastern and southern border (Tab. 1).<br />

In fact, as further analysis showed the<br />

import from Czech Republic accounted


Confi scation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland... 47<br />

TABLE 1. The number <strong>of</strong> confiscations <strong>of</strong> live animals at various control points<br />

Place 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total<br />

Wa 2 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 3 <strong>–</strong> 19<br />

1Bia <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> 2 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 3<br />

1Ol <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

1BP <strong>–</strong> 2 2 <strong>–</strong> 1 1 <strong>–</strong> 1 2 1 <strong>–</strong> 10<br />

1Prz <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 2 <strong>–</strong> 5 3 3 6 1 2 2 24<br />

2Kr <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

2NT 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

2Cie <strong>–</strong> 1 2 10 11 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 25<br />

2Kat <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 1 1 6 2 11<br />

2Wr <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 5 3 6 2 1 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 18<br />

2Op <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 3 <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> 4<br />

3Rz <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

3Poz <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

4Sz 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

4Gdy <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> 1 2 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 5<br />

Ł* <strong>–</strong> 1 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1<br />

Total 4 9 12 20 29 8 7 14 6 13 4 126<br />

Abbreviations:<br />

Wa <strong>–</strong> Warszawa<br />

1<strong>–</strong> eastern border <strong>–</strong> Bia-Białystok, Ol <strong>–</strong> Olsztyn, Bp <strong>–</strong> Biała Podlaska, Prz <strong>–</strong> Przemyśl<br />

2 <strong>–</strong> southern border <strong>–</strong> Kr <strong>–</strong> Kraków, NT <strong>–</strong> Nowy Targ, Cie <strong>–</strong> Cieszyn, Kat <strong>–</strong> Katowice, Wr <strong>–</strong> Wrocław,<br />

Op <strong>–</strong> Opole<br />

3 <strong>–</strong> western border <strong>–</strong> Rz <strong>–</strong> Rzepin, Poz <strong>–</strong> Poznań<br />

4 <strong>–</strong> northern border <strong>–</strong> Sz <strong>–</strong> Szczecin, Gdy <strong>–</strong> Gdynia<br />

Ł* <strong>–</strong> Łódź <strong>–</strong> confiscation after the road control<br />

for 30% <strong>of</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> confiscations<br />

and from Ukraine 20%. On the other<br />

hand, the attempts to export live animals<br />

accounted only for 6% and 14% <strong>of</strong> confiscations<br />

concerned domestic market.<br />

Predominance <strong>of</strong> Czech Republic and<br />

Ukraine in confiscations which took<br />

place in 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period not necessarily<br />

means that confiscated animas were<br />

smuggled only from these countries.<br />

These countries can re-export animals<br />

from remote countries e.g. Far Eastern<br />

countries.<br />

Table 2 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

confiscations <strong>of</strong> animals from various<br />

groups in particular years. It is clearly<br />

visible that birds and reptiles accounted<br />

for greater part <strong>of</strong> confiscated specimens.<br />

Although number <strong>of</strong> species was<br />

rather restricted, the number <strong>of</strong> confiscated<br />

individuals highly varied from 52<br />

to over 2000 specimens. In the last case<br />

the high number is an effect <strong>of</strong> invertebrates<br />

(leeches).<br />

It should be noted that the number <strong>of</strong><br />

confiscated birds is underestimated. In<br />

some database records (particularly in the<br />

first years <strong>of</strong> period studied) there were<br />

description such as “live birds” or “live<br />

parakeets”. This cases were not taken<br />

into account in the present analysis.<br />

List <strong>of</strong> fully or nearly identified animals<br />

uncovered by Polish custom service<br />

is shown in Table 3. In sum, there were 5


48 T. Kaleta, A. Szymańska<br />

TABLE 2. Number <strong>of</strong> species and specimens <strong>of</strong> animals uncovered by Polish custom service in 1998<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>2008 period<br />

Year<br />

Mammals Birds Reptiles Invertebrates Total Total<br />

Sp Spe Sp Spe Sp Spe Sp Spe Sp Spe<br />

1998 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 1 2 2 62 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 3 64<br />

1999 1 1 1 5 4 298 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 6 304<br />

2000 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 14 57 6 1 108 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 20 1 165<br />

2001 2 2 26 121 7 666 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 35 789<br />

2002 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 18 103 9 1 351 1 18 28 1 472<br />

2003 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 7 12 3 15 3 25 13 52<br />

2004 1 1 2 6 3 531 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 6 538<br />

2005 1 1 2 2 8 1 002 1 1 12 1 006<br />

2006 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 3 8 5 8 1 2 000 9 2 016<br />

2007 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 18 137 6 109 1 3 25 249<br />

2008 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 5 63 2 42 <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 7 105<br />

Total* x 5 x 516 x 5 192 x 2 047 7 760<br />

Specimens<br />

Abbreviations:<br />

Sp <strong>–</strong> species; Spe <strong>–</strong> specimens<br />

*As species repeated in various years the sum is not appropriate in this case.<br />

invertebrate species, 19 reptiles, 57 birds<br />

and 5 mammals.<br />

Confiscations <strong>of</strong> live fishes and<br />

amphibians have been not recorded. It<br />

does not mean that these animals were<br />

not smuggled to Poland at all. Rather the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> illegal transports was lower<br />

in this case The reason was probably<br />

relatively low popularity <strong>of</strong> keeping<br />

amphibians and big legal home market<br />

for ornamental fishes to great degree satisfying<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> breeders.<br />

The two main groups <strong>of</strong> animals in<br />

database were birds and reptiles. The<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the first group were<br />

predominantly parakeets and parrots<br />

usually species widely bred and popular in<br />

the pet industry (e.g. lovebirds and rosellas)<br />

(Alderton, 1992). There were also<br />

macaws and grey parrot valuable and<br />

highly threatened in the wild, and some<br />

other non-psittacide species. It seems<br />

that the greater part <strong>of</strong> above mentioned<br />

birds originated from breeding, not from<br />

the wild.The reason <strong>of</strong> confiscation was<br />

apparently lack <strong>of</strong> proper documentation.<br />

According to EU law the trade is illicit<br />

in this case.<br />

In reptiles individuals from all main<br />

orders were present. In chelonians group<br />

there were mainly tortoises rather popular<br />

in Poland as pet animals according to<br />

some sources (http://wetkros.republika.pl/<br />

zolwie.htm). The separate case <strong>of</strong> confiscation<br />

was slider seen in Poland as potentially<br />

invasive species (Głowaciński et<br />

al., 1998). In the studied group fairly<br />

well represented were also snakes from<br />

the family Boidae. There were several<br />

and biologically interesting species <strong>of</strong><br />

lizard group (with very poplar green<br />

iguana). Two cases <strong>of</strong> smuggling crocodilians<br />

were also recorded.<br />

In mammals only order Primates was<br />

represented with five species commonly<br />

used as pet or laboratory animals. Since


Confi scation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland... 49<br />

TABLE 3. List <strong>of</strong> living animals confiscated in Poland during the 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period<br />

English and latin name<br />

Short taxonomy<br />

1 2<br />

INVERTEBRATES<br />

Stony Coral*<br />

Cnidaria<br />

(no detailed taxonomy)<br />

Anthozoa<br />

Sclerastina<br />

Tridacna clam<br />

Tridacna sp.<br />

Medicinal leech<br />

Hirudo medicinalis<br />

Mexican fireleg tarantula<br />

Brachypelma boehmei<br />

Mexican redrump tarantula<br />

Brachypelma vagans<br />

Central Asia tortoise<br />

Testudio horsfieldi<br />

Hermann’s tortoise<br />

Testudio hermanni<br />

Spur-tighed tortoise<br />

Testudio graeca<br />

Egyptian tortoise<br />

Testudio keinmanni<br />

South American red-footed tortoise<br />

Geochelone carbonaria<br />

Slider<br />

Trachemys scripta elegans<br />

Green iguana<br />

Iguana iguana<br />

African spiny-tailed lizard<br />

Uromastyx acanthinurus<br />

Veiled chameleon<br />

Chamaeleo calyptratus<br />

Madagascar chameleon<br />

Furcifer sp.<br />

Crested gecko<br />

Rhacodactylus ciliates<br />

Madagascar gecko<br />

Phelsuma sp.<br />

VERTEBRATES<br />

Mollusca<br />

Bivalvia<br />

Tridacnidae<br />

Annelida<br />

Oligochaeta<br />

Hirudinidae<br />

Arthropoda<br />

Arachnida<br />

Araneae<br />

Theraphosinae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Testudinata<br />

Cryptodira<br />

Testdinidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Testudinata<br />

Cryptodira<br />

Emydidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Iguanidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Agamidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Chamaeleontidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Gekkonidae


50 T. Kaleta, A. Szymańska<br />

Table 3. (continued)<br />

1 2<br />

Girdled lizard<br />

Reptilia<br />

Cordylus sp.<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Cordylidae<br />

Monitor<br />

Varanus sp.<br />

Indian python<br />

Python molurus<br />

Ball python<br />

Python regius<br />

Reticulated python<br />

Python reticulatus<br />

Boa constrictor<br />

Boa constrictor<br />

Australian python<br />

Morelia spilotes<br />

Green tree python<br />

Morelia viridis<br />

Rainbow boa<br />

Epicrates cenchria<br />

Amazon tree boa<br />

Corallus hortulanus<br />

American alligator<br />

Alligator mississippiensis<br />

Spectacled caiman<br />

Caiman crocodiles<br />

Fischer’s lovebird<br />

Agapornis fi scheri<br />

Yellow-collared lovebird<br />

Agapornis personata<br />

Rosy-faced lovebird<br />

Agapornis roseicollis<br />

Australian king parrot<br />

Alisterus scapularis<br />

Cuban parrot<br />

Amazona leucocephala<br />

Red-winged parrot<br />

Aprosmictus erythropterus<br />

Blue and yellow macaw<br />

Ara araruana<br />

Scarlet macaw<br />

Ara macao<br />

Salmon-crested cockatoo<br />

Cacatua moluccensis<br />

Burrowing parakeet<br />

Cyanoliseus patagonus<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Sauria<br />

Varanidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Squamata<br />

Serpentes<br />

Boidae<br />

Reptilia<br />

Crocodilia<br />

Alligatoridae<br />

Aves<br />

Psittaciformes<br />

Psittacidae


Confi scation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland... 51<br />

Table 3. (continued)<br />

1 2<br />

Yellow-fronted parakeet<br />

Cyanoramphus auriceps<br />

Red-fronted parakeet<br />

Cyanoramphus novazelandiae<br />

Monk parakeet<br />

Miopsitta monachus<br />

Nanday parakeet<br />

Nandayus nenday<br />

Turqouise parrot<br />

Neophema pulchella<br />

Bourke’s parrot<br />

Neophema (=Neophotus) bourki<br />

Pale-headed rosella<br />

Platycercus adscitus<br />

Crimson rosella<br />

Platycercus elegans<br />

Eastern rosella<br />

Platycercus eximius<br />

Yellow rosella<br />

Platycercus fl aveolas<br />

Western rosella<br />

Platycercus icterotis<br />

Senegal parrot<br />

Poicephalus Senegalu<br />

Alexandra’s parrot<br />

Polytelis alexandrae<br />

Regent parrot<br />

Polytelis anthopeplus<br />

Superb parrot<br />

Polytelis swainsonii<br />

Red-rumped parrot<br />

Psephotus haematonotus<br />

Plum-headed parakeet<br />

Psittacula cyanocephalus<br />

Rose-ringed parakeet<br />

Psittacula krameri<br />

Grey parrot<br />

Psittacus erithacus<br />

Green aracari<br />

Pteroglussus viridis<br />

Cut-throat<br />

Amadina fasciata<br />

Black-rumped waxbill<br />

Estrilda troglodytes<br />

African silverbill<br />

Lonchura cantans<br />

African quailfinch<br />

Ortygospiza atricollis<br />

Aves<br />

Piciformes<br />

Ramphastidae<br />

Aves<br />

Passeriformes<br />

Passeridae


52 T. Kaleta, A. Szymańska<br />

Table 3. (continued)<br />

1 2<br />

Java sparrow<br />

Padda oryzivora<br />

Red-cheeked cordonbleu<br />

Uraeginthus bengalus<br />

Pin-tailed whydah<br />

Vidua macroura<br />

Common marmoset<br />

Callithrix jacchus<br />

Vervet monkey<br />

Cercopithecus aetiops<br />

Stump-tailed macaque<br />

Macaca arctoides<br />

Crab-eating macaque<br />

Macaca fascicularis<br />

Savanna baboon<br />

Papio cynocephalus<br />

Mammalia<br />

Primates<br />

Callithricidae<br />

Mammalia<br />

Primates<br />

Cercopithecidae<br />

Names and taxonomy based on Marshall (1996), Monoroe and Sibley (1993), Sokolov (1988), Ernst<br />

and Barbour (1989), Woliński (1990) and Arkive (www.arkive.org)<br />

the European Union highly restricted the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> primates as laboratory animals<br />

(Peter, 2010), it seems that destination<br />

for all smuggled animals was to be kept<br />

as pets. All these primates are commercially<br />

available for example in the US<br />

market (www.monkeys-for-sale.com)<br />

The invertebrate group comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

marine species used in aquaculture (coral<br />

and tridacna clam) and spiders (tarantulas)<br />

kept as pet animals. Live tridacna<br />

clam was an exception in database in<br />

comparison with recorded huge number<br />

<strong>of</strong> tridacna shells each year illegally<br />

imported to Poland.<br />

Rather curious case seems to be confiscation<br />

<strong>of</strong> medicine leech. However,<br />

this animal is protected in the wild. In<br />

medicine only individuals from highly<br />

specialized breeding are used (Jurga,<br />

2004).<br />

It seems that the destination for live<br />

animals confiscated in Poland in 1998<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>2008 was mostly pet animals market.<br />

Collection <strong>of</strong> species as regards taxonomy<br />

was rather typical for trade pattern<br />

observed in the world (Fitzgerald, 1989).<br />

However, as may be expected the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals smuggled varied depending<br />

on species and given transport.<br />

This aspect was shown in Table 4.<br />

Central Asia tortoise turned out to be<br />

the most numerous species in trade with<br />

high numbers ranged from 113 to 747 in<br />

a single transport. Other species <strong>of</strong> tortoises<br />

were also smuggled in fairly high<br />

numbers so was (in one recorded case)<br />

green iguana. On the other hand, birds<br />

uncovered in single transport were usually<br />

less numerous. The occurrences <strong>of</strong><br />

mixed species (various birds or birds and<br />

reptiles or other animals) in single confiscated<br />

baggage were also noted.<br />

Undoubtedly number confiscated wild<br />

animals in Poland in 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period<br />

only to some degree reflected the smug-


Confi scation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland... 53<br />

TABLE 4. Some high numbers <strong>of</strong> live animals<br />

confiscated by the Polish custom <strong>of</strong>ficers in single<br />

case during 1998<strong>–</strong>2008 period<br />

Species<br />

Year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

specimens<br />

confiscated<br />

Medicinal leech<br />

2006 2000<br />

(Hirudo medicinalis)<br />

Central Asia tortoise 2000 747<br />

(Testudio horsfieldi)<br />

As above 2005 351<br />

As above 2002 113<br />

Spur-tighed tortoise 1999 120<br />

(Testudio graeca)<br />

Hermann’s tortoise 2000 84<br />

(Testudio hermanni)<br />

Lizard (Various species) 2007 102<br />

Green iguana<br />

1998 60<br />

(Iguana iguana)<br />

American alligator 2005 11<br />

(Alligator mississippiensis)<br />

Birds (Various species) 2000 42<br />

glers activity. This period was only the<br />

first when Polish custom service tried<br />

to control effectively illicit trade in animals.<br />

This was the period <strong>of</strong> gaining<br />

experiences and training <strong>of</strong> specialized<br />

enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficers to help identify the<br />

species being traded.<br />

As a discussion maybe it would be<br />

instructive to compare above-mentioned<br />

results with the <strong>of</strong>fers on the internet<br />

sites concerning exotics animals. PTOP<br />

“Salamandra” is Polish NGO which has<br />

monitored trade in protected animals<br />

since 2004 when Poland joined EU.<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> PTOP “Salamandra” have<br />

monitored Polish internet sites related to<br />

trade in animals (e.g. auctions, advertisements<br />

and pet shops). This type <strong>of</strong> monitoring<br />

to some degree reflects the picture<br />

<strong>of</strong> trade in wild animals in Poland and<br />

popularity <strong>of</strong> particular species.<br />

In third report (Kepel et al., 2009)<br />

authors revealed that birds are the most<br />

popular animals <strong>of</strong>fered online, with<br />

arachnids and reptiles as the second<br />

popular. In the birds group psittacide<br />

prevailed with the red-fronted parakeet<br />

rated as the most frequently mentioned<br />

in advertisements and auctions. Java<br />

sparrow was the most important species<br />

from non-psittacide birds. Both species<br />

occured in our database.<br />

As regards reptiles the snakes from<br />

family Boidae turned out to be the most<br />

wanted. All species mentioned in “Salamandra”<br />

study (boa constrictor and two<br />

pythons) can be found in our database.<br />

So were green iguana, veiled chameleon,<br />

Central Asia tortoise and Hermann’s tortoise,<br />

the most popular reptiles for sale<br />

from the other reptile groups. Offers<br />

concerning crocodilians were very rare<br />

(only spectacled caiman which was also<br />

present in our database).<br />

Advertisements concerning live mammals<br />

for sale were rare. Only three species<br />

<strong>of</strong> primates were mentioned in<br />

“Salamandra” study, with crab-eating<br />

macaque present in our database. Also very<br />

rare were <strong>of</strong>fers concerning amphibians<br />

(only Dendrobates sp. and Phyllobates<br />

sp.). There were no <strong>of</strong>fers concerning<br />

live fishes.<br />

In invertebrate group the most popular<br />

species turned out to be tarantulas from<br />

the genus Brachypelma. Great interest<br />

<strong>of</strong> potential buyers resulted in fact that<br />

number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers concerning these animals<br />

was nearly so high as in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> birds. From three species mentioned<br />

the Mexican redrump tarantula occurred<br />

in our database. There were also some<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers concerning live corals, but as<br />

mentioned authors <strong>of</strong> “Salamandra”


54 T. Kaleta, A. Szymańska<br />

study there were other ways than online<br />

buying to obtain corals in an aquaculture<br />

industry.<br />

To sum up, Kepel et al. (2009) claimed<br />

that number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers online concerning<br />

exotic animals for sale on Polish<br />

sites increased three times comparing to<br />

2005<strong>–</strong>2006 period.<br />

As concerns present work, comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> our data and PTOP Salamandra<br />

study revealed some convergence. It was<br />

particularly visible in the case <strong>of</strong> birds<br />

and reptiles wanted in home market and<br />

attempts to smuggle them into Poland. On<br />

the other hand, there was small interest in<br />

living amphibians and fishes observed in<br />

both sets <strong>of</strong> data. It would be interesting<br />

to investigate if this trend will be present<br />

also in the following years.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

1. In the first ten years <strong>of</strong> trade in animals<br />

control in accordance with EU<br />

law and CITES in Poland custom <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

confiscated nearly 8000 animals<br />

from 126 transports.<br />

2. The smuggling <strong>of</strong> live animals prevailed<br />

on eastern and southern Polish<br />

border.<br />

3. Poland was primarily target country<br />

with animals imported mainly from<br />

Czech Republic and Ukraine.<br />

4. Birds and reptiles with bias in favour<br />

<strong>of</strong> psittacide and chelonians were s the<br />

most important smuggled animals.<br />

5. The study <strong>of</strong> popularity <strong>of</strong> the exotic<br />

pets in Poland on the basis <strong>of</strong> the monitoring<br />

online trade revealed proximity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the popular species <strong>of</strong>fered on internet<br />

sites (birds, arachnids and reptiles)<br />

to the set <strong>of</strong> species confiscated by the<br />

custom <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ALDERTON D., 1992: You and your birds. Dorling<br />

Kidersley Ltd., London.<br />

ERNST C., BARBOUR R., 1989: Turtles <strong>of</strong> the<br />

World. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.<br />

EU Wildlife Trade Regulation 1996. (http://www.<br />

unepwcmc.org/species/trade/eu/tradereg.html)<br />

FITZGERALD S., 1989: International Wildlife<br />

Trade: Whose business i sit? WWF, Washington.<br />

GŁOWACIŃSKI Z., OKARMA H., PAWŁOW-<br />

SKI J., SOLARZ W., 2008: Księga gatunków<br />

obcych i inwazyjnych w faunie Polski. IOP<br />

Kraków. (http://www.iop.krakow.pl/ias/Projekt.aspx)<br />

JURA Cz., 2004: Bezkręgowce. Podstawy morfologii<br />

funkcjonalnej, systematyki i filogenezy.<br />

PWN, Warszawa.<br />

KEPEL A., KALA B., GRACLIK A., 2009: Ginące<br />

gatunki w sieci. Raport 2009. (www. salamandra.org,pl)<br />

MARSHALL S., 1996: Tarantulas and Other<br />

Arachnids. Barron’s, Hauppage.<br />

MONROE B., SIBLEY Ch., 1993: A World<br />

Checklist <strong>of</strong> Birds. Yale <strong>University</strong> Press, New<br />

Haven and London.<br />

OLDFIELD S., 2003: The Trade in Wildlife:<br />

Regulation for Conservation. Earthscan Publications.<br />

London.<br />

PETER L., 2010: EU to boost lab animals’ welfare.<br />

(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8619605.<br />

stm)<br />

SERPELL J., 1996: In the company <strong>of</strong> animals.<br />

A study <strong>of</strong> human <strong>–</strong> animal Companionship.<br />

Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, Cambridge, New<br />

York, Melbourne.<br />

SOKOLOV V., 1988: Dictionary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong><br />

Names in Five Languages. Amphibians and<br />

Reptiles. Russky Yazyk Publishers, Moscow.<br />

TRUSIŃSKI R., 2009: Konwencja Waszyngtońska.<br />

Wiadomości Celne, 10<strong>–</strong>11, 1<strong>–</strong>13.<br />

WOLINSKI Z., 1990: Małpy i małpiatki. WSiP,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

Internet sites<br />

www.arkive.org<br />

www.cites.org<br />

www.monkey-for-sale.com<br />

http://wetkros.republika.pl/zolwie.htm


Confi scation <strong>of</strong> live exotic animals in Poland... 55<br />

Streszczenie: Konfi skata przez służbę celną<br />

w Polsce żywych, egzotycznych zwierząt zgodnie<br />

z prawem Unii Europejskiej i konwencją CITES<br />

w latach 1998<strong>–</strong>2008. Na podstawie dokumentacji<br />

dostarczonej przez polską Służbę Celną autorzy<br />

zbadali konfiskaty żywych zwierząt w pierwszym<br />

okresie wdrażania w Polsce konwencji CITES<br />

oraz prawa Unii Europejskiej. W okresie 1998<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>2008 skonfiskowano niemal 8000 zwierząt w 126<br />

transportach. Polska była przeważnie krajem docelowym<br />

dla przemycanych zwierząt, a transportowano<br />

je przede wszystkim z Republiki Czeskiej<br />

i z Ukrainy. Urzędnicy celni najczęściej odkrywali<br />

przemycane ptaki i gady. Nie odnotowano przemytu<br />

żywych ryb i płazów. Największe liczby<br />

skonfiskowanych zwierząt w jednym transporcie<br />

odnotowano w przypadku żółwi. Wzorzec nielegalnego<br />

handlu był do pewnego stopnia zbieżny<br />

z wynikami badań dotyczących rynku internetowego<br />

na zwierzęta w Polsce przeprowadzonych<br />

przez polską organizację pozarządową PTP „Salamandra”.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Ogólnej Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

<strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: tkaleta@gazeta.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 57<strong>–</strong>64<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci for body composition<br />

in two growth-differentiated mouse lines<br />

DOROTA ŁUKASIEWICZ-ŚMIETAŃSKA 1 ,<br />

ELŻBIETA WIRTH-DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA 1 , MARTA GAJEWSKA 2<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Laboratory <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial<br />

Cancer Center and Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology, <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

Abstract: Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci<br />

for body composition in two growth-differentiated<br />

mouse lines. We performed a genome-wide quantitative<br />

trait locus (QTL) analysis <strong>of</strong> body composition<br />

at two lines L and C derived from the cross<br />

<strong>of</strong> four mice strains (A/St, C57BL/6, BALB/c,<br />

BN/a). Interval mapping revealed five suggestive<br />

QTLs for tail length, two QTLs for mesenteric<br />

fat and liver weight, one QTL for parametrial fat<br />

weight, pancreas, kidney and adrenal weight and<br />

tree QTLs for spleen weight.<br />

Key words: body composition, quantitative trait<br />

loci, mouse, selected lines, fat.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The body composition traits <strong>of</strong> livestock<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the major challenge <strong>of</strong> breeders.<br />

The overall body weight consists <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

components, such as fat mass, muscle<br />

mass and internal organ mass. The livestock<br />

industry is currently making a big<br />

effort to reduce carcass fat in response to<br />

marketing and consumer demands. Selection<br />

is the best method <strong>of</strong> reducing fat<br />

in farm animals because <strong>of</strong> a permanent<br />

effect (Eisen, C<strong>of</strong>fey, 1990). Body composition<br />

is a typical example <strong>of</strong> a complex<br />

trait which is regulated by multiple<br />

QTL with small effect. The knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> QTL affecting certain components <strong>of</strong><br />

body weight will facilitate the selection.<br />

Like it was referred in the previous<br />

paper, in Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricultural<br />

<strong>University</strong> (<strong>SGGW</strong>) are maintained<br />

unique lines <strong>of</strong> laboratory mice selected<br />

divergently for body weight on 21st day<br />

<strong>of</strong> life for 120 generations. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

the long-term selection, the mice from<br />

tested lines varied significantly in body<br />

weight, body length and body composition<br />

(Wirth-Dzięciołowska et al., 1997;<br />

Wirth-Dzięciołowska, Czumińska, 2000).<br />

This study focuses on the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

QTLs affecting fat weights, body length<br />

and organ weights in L (light) and C<br />

(heavy) lines <strong>of</strong> mice.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

<strong>Animal</strong>s<br />

<strong>Animal</strong>s used in the present study were<br />

obtained by intercrossing the light line<br />

(L) and the heavy line (C). These two<br />

lines originated from the cross <strong>of</strong> four<br />

inbred strains: A/St, C57BL/6, BALB/c


58 D. Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska, E. Wirth-Dzięciołowska, M. Gajewska<br />

and BN/a. (Radomska et al., 1970a, b;<br />

Sławiński, 1974). The selection criterion<br />

was the body weight on day 21 <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Group <strong>of</strong> animals from generation 120<br />

(10 females form the C line and 10 males<br />

form the L line) were mated to produce<br />

F1. The mating <strong>of</strong> F1 resulted in 236 F2<br />

individuals. The mice were housed in<br />

a conventionally conditioned room with<br />

temperature 22 ±2˚C and 60% humidity.<br />

The mice had free access to water and<br />

standard pelleted died (Lab<strong>of</strong>eed H<br />

manufactured by Morawski Co, Poland).<br />

At 150 day <strong>of</strong> life all mice were sacrificed.<br />

The liver, kidney, adrenal, spleen<br />

and pancreas were removed from the<br />

carcass and individually weighed using<br />

a sensitive digital balance. The perigonadal,<br />

parametrial and mesenteric fat<br />

were dissected and weighed. The relative<br />

organ and fat weights were calculated by<br />

dividing the weight <strong>of</strong> the organ with the<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> the mouse to which it belonged.<br />

There was also measured the body length<br />

(from the nose tip to the base <strong>of</strong> the tail)<br />

and tail length. The animals received the<br />

human care and ethical treatment. The<br />

experiment was approved by the Local<br />

Ethics Commission.<br />

Genotyping<br />

DNA was extracted from tails with NucleoSpin®<br />

Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel-<br />

-08/2004/rev 03). Seventy eight microsatellite<br />

markers distributed across 19<br />

autosomes and X, Y chromosomes were<br />

used in genotyping (Tab. 1). In choosing<br />

markers special attention was paid to the<br />

polymorphism level <strong>of</strong> the four initial<br />

inbred strains and the difference in the size<br />

<strong>of</strong> allele. Genotypes were analyzed using<br />

PCR reaction performed in the standard<br />

conditions (Gajewska et al., 2002). PCR<br />

products were electrophoresed on 4<strong>–</strong>5%<br />

high resolution agarose gel.<br />

QTL analysis<br />

Allele frequency, Fisher test and chisquare<br />

test were calculated using SAS.<br />

The Qxpak s<strong>of</strong>tware (Perez-Enciso,<br />

Misztal, 2004) were used to evaluate the<br />

associations between phenotypes and genetic<br />

markers in the F2 population. The<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> each potential association<br />

was measured as likelihood ratio statistic<br />

(LRS). LOD score were obtained by<br />

dividing the LRS by 4.605.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The differences between mice line light<br />

(L) and heavy (C) were evident not only<br />

in body weight (Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska<br />

et al., 2009), but also in their size (length)<br />

(Tab. 2).These differences are statistically<br />

significant between females (p ≤ 0.001)<br />

and males ( p ≤ 0.05).<br />

Mice from both selected lines differed<br />

in the absolute and relative weight <strong>of</strong><br />

internal organs and fat mass. Particularly<br />

interesting is the difference in weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> perigonadal fat. The relative weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> perigonadal fat was significantly<br />

higher in females from line L than in<br />

line C. Females from the light line had<br />

considerably higher relative parametrial<br />

mass <strong>of</strong> fat as compared to females from<br />

the heavy line. The relative weight <strong>of</strong><br />

total internal fat is also higher in L line<br />

females than in C line. The difference in<br />

this trait is not such expressive between<br />

males (Tab. 3).<br />

Using microsatellite markers analysis<br />

we detected 16 QTL for 10 traits: 5 for<br />

tail length, 3 for spleen, 2 for liver and<br />

mesenteric fat and 1 for parametrial fat,


Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci... 59<br />

TABLE 1. List <strong>of</strong> the microsatellite marker loci typed<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)*<br />

D1Mit3 11<br />

D1Mit18 29.7<br />

D1Mit46 43.1<br />

D1Mit42 78<br />

D1Mit200 80<br />

D1Mit15 87.9<br />

D1Mit511 109.6<br />

D1Mit155 112<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D6Mit1<br />

D6Mit228<br />

D6Mit254<br />

D6Mit15<br />

2.8<br />

37<br />

60.5<br />

74<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D11Mit78<br />

D11Mit8<br />

D11Mit301<br />

Marker and<br />

2.0<br />

46.17<br />

69<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D16Mit9<br />

D16Mit174<br />

D16Mit114<br />

D16Mit50<br />

D16Mit106<br />

4.0<br />

43<br />

44.5<br />

53.5<br />

71.45<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D2Mit238 28<br />

D2Mit102 52.5<br />

D2Mit226 96<br />

D2Mit265 105<br />

D2Mit200 107<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D7Mit178<br />

D7Mit267<br />

D7Mit147<br />

D7Mit40<br />

D7Mit68<br />

0.5<br />

11<br />

37<br />

53<br />

60<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D12Mit136<br />

D12Mit214<br />

D12Mit133<br />

13<br />

38<br />

56<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D17Mit133 10.4<br />

D17Mit152 37.7<br />

D17Mit244 55.7<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D3Mit164 2.4<br />

D3Mit21 19.2<br />

D3Mit173 29.5<br />

D3Mit45 78.5<br />

D3Mit147 79.4<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D8Mit155<br />

D8Mit287<br />

D8Mit65<br />

D8Mit271<br />

D8Mit318<br />

1<br />

8<br />

22.5<br />

57<br />

57<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D13Mit88<br />

D13Mit128<br />

D13Mit77<br />

Marker and<br />

21<br />

48<br />

73<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D18Mit64 2.0<br />

D18Mit202 22<br />

D18Mit184 41<br />

*Map positions (cM) are from Mouse Genome Informatics database.<br />

TABLE 2. Traits measured in line L and C<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D4Mit315 0.0<br />

D4Mit288 28.6<br />

D4Mit152 40.0<br />

D4Mit234 71<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D9Mit48<br />

D9Mit311<br />

34<br />

65<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D14Mit14<br />

D14Mit165<br />

10<br />

52<br />

Marker and<br />

map position cM)<br />

D19Mit59 0.5<br />

D19Mit19 26<br />

D19Mit53 43<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D5Mit346 1.0<br />

D5Mit13 20<br />

D5Mit394 34<br />

D5Mit239 58<br />

D5Mit168 78<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D10Mit168<br />

D10Mit115<br />

D10Mit134<br />

9.0<br />

38.4<br />

59<br />

Marker and<br />

map position (cM)<br />

D15Mit12<br />

D15Mit122<br />

D15Mit161<br />

Marker and<br />

4.7<br />

34.2<br />

69.2<br />

map position (cM)<br />

ZFY 19<br />

DXM140 62<br />

DXM197<br />

Famale<br />

Male<br />

Trait<br />

L C L C<br />

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD<br />

Body length (cm) 8.0 0.4 11.3 0.4 9.4 0.4 10.1 0.5<br />

Tail length (cm) 8.0 0.4 9.9 0.5 8.4 0.6 10.2 0.4<br />

TABLE 3. Relative value <strong>of</strong> analyzed traits to body weight (in %)<br />

Trait<br />

Female<br />

Male<br />

L C L C<br />

Mesenteric fat weight<br />

Perigonadal fat weight<br />

Parametrial fat weight<br />

Total internal fat<br />

Pancreas weight<br />

Liver weight<br />

Kidney weight<br />

Adrenal weight<br />

Spleen weight<br />

1.50%<br />

0.66%<br />

1.90%<br />

4.06%<br />

0.58%<br />

6.11%<br />

1.41%<br />

0.05%<br />

0.47%<br />

1.40%<br />

0.19%<br />

1.10%<br />

2.69%<br />

0.69%<br />

7.60%<br />

1.52%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.34%<br />

1.34%<br />

1.22%<br />

<strong>–</strong><br />

2.56%<br />

0.49%<br />

6.54%<br />

1.85%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.37%<br />

1.32%<br />

0.99%<br />

<strong>–</strong><br />

2.31%<br />

0.64%<br />

6.58%<br />

1.63%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.26%


60 D. Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska, E. Wirth-Dzięciołowska, M. Gajewska<br />

pancreas, adrenal and kidney weight. No<br />

significant linkages were identified for<br />

body length and perigonadal fat (Tab. 4).<br />

Locus identified on chromosome 11<br />

(69 cM) controls three traits (kidney,<br />

mesenteric fat weight and tail length)<br />

(Fig. 1). It is possible that in this region<br />

<strong>of</strong> chromosome 11 there are 3 tightly<br />

linked QTL but we can’t exclude that<br />

co-localization could be caused by pleiotropic<br />

effects (Knott, Haley, 2000; Lund<br />

et al., 2003).<br />

TABLE 4. QTLs detected for analyzed traits<br />

Trait Chr LRS<br />

(LOD)<br />

Tail length 1 9.72<br />

(2.1)<br />

3 13.22<br />

(2.9)<br />

9 8.54<br />

(1.9)<br />

11 10.81<br />

(2.3)<br />

18 9.89<br />

(2.1)<br />

Mesenteric 7 9.99<br />

fat weight<br />

(2.2)<br />

11 8.6<br />

(1.9)<br />

Parametrial 2 10.44<br />

fat weight<br />

(2.7)<br />

Pancreas 11 11.25<br />

weight<br />

(2.4)<br />

Liver<br />

2 9.84<br />

weight<br />

(2.1)<br />

3 8.89<br />

(1.9)<br />

Kidney 11 11.02<br />

weight<br />

(2.4)<br />

Adrenal 7 9.98<br />

weight<br />

(2.2)<br />

Spleen 4 8.29<br />

weight<br />

(1.8)<br />

9 8.45<br />

(1.8)<br />

10 7.66<br />

(1.7)<br />

p<br />

The highest<br />

peak LOD<br />

score (cM)*<br />

Flanking<br />

Markers<br />

0.053 44 D1M46-D1M42 41<strong>–</strong>50<br />

CI 90% CI 95%<br />

0.007 20 D3M21-D3M45 4<strong>–</strong>42 9<strong>–</strong>39<br />

0.034 65 D9M311-D9M311 54<strong>–</strong>65 61<strong>–</strong>65<br />

0.018 25 D11M8-D11M78 1<strong>–</strong>69 1<strong>–</strong>46<br />

0.028 25 D18M202-D18M184 16<strong>–</strong>32 19<strong>–</strong>29<br />

0.046 60 D7M68-D7M68 57<strong>–</strong>60 60<strong>–</strong>60<br />

0.053 69 D11M301-D11M301 65<strong>–</strong>69<br />

0.029 31 D2M238-D2M102 1<strong>–</strong>40 1<strong>–</strong>37<br />

0.014 69 D11M301-D11M301 51<strong>–</strong>69 54<strong>–</strong>69<br />

0.039 22 D2M238-D2M102 1<strong>–</strong>39 1<strong>–</strong>34<br />

0.063 3 D3M164-D3M21 1<strong>–</strong>13<br />

0.016 69 D11M301-D11M301 60<strong>–</strong>69 63<strong>–</strong>69<br />

0.047 47 D7M40-D7M147 42<strong>–</strong>52 46<strong>–</strong>48<br />

0.084 1 D4M315-D4M288 1<strong>–</strong>5<br />

0.036 64 D9M311-D9M311 39<strong>–</strong>65 53<strong>–</strong>65<br />

0.083 59 D10M134-D10M134 56<strong>–</strong>59<br />

Chr <strong>–</strong> chromosome<br />

LOD <strong>–</strong> logarithm <strong>of</strong> odds<br />

LRS <strong>–</strong> likelihood ratio test<br />

p <strong>–</strong> p-value (statistical significance)<br />

*Approximate positions (Mouse Genome Database)<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximum likelihood peaks<br />

CI <strong>–</strong> confidence intervals


Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci... 61<br />

Chromosom 11<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Plots <strong>of</strong>:<br />

1 Pancreas weight 2 Kidney weight 3 Mesenteric weight<br />

FIGURE 1. LOD score plot for Chromosome 11; Threshold is marked by solid line [suggestive <strong>–</strong><br />

LRS > 6.915 ( LOD > 1.5)]<br />

For tail length there were identificated<br />

5 loci on chromosomes 1, 3, 9, 11 and<br />

18. The position <strong>of</strong> QTL mapped in this<br />

study on chromosome 1 coincident with<br />

result obtained by Kenney-Hunt et al.<br />

(2006) who mapped LBN1.1 at 50 cM.<br />

These authors have reported that the<br />

same genes can regulate tail length and<br />

long bone length because those QTL frequently<br />

share the same location. Cheverud<br />

(2001) located Skl1 (skeletal size (tail<br />

length) 1) at 41 cM at the same region<br />

as LBN 1.1, which affects all four long<br />

bones and consequently regulates the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> an animal. There are many publications<br />

which confirm that the tail can<br />

be an indicator <strong>of</strong> skeletal growth (Kaufhold<br />

et al., 2002; Christians et al., 2003;<br />

Ankara-Badu et al., 2009). In this study<br />

we didn’t measured the length <strong>of</strong> bones<br />

so it’s impossible to consider if this locus<br />

influences length <strong>of</strong> bones too.<br />

Christians et al. (2003) using mice<br />

cross (C57BL/6J × DBA/2J) F2 detected<br />

location <strong>of</strong> locus Tlln (tail length) similar<br />

to that reported by us. C57BL/6J-derived<br />

alleles confer increased tail length at this<br />

locus. QTL detected in this analysis colocalized<br />

also with the Bnszq2 (bone size<br />

QTL 2) (45 cM) which regulates bone<br />

size.<br />

Another two QTLs for tail length were<br />

mapped on chromosome 3 and 9 (20 and<br />

65 cM respectively). These two loci<br />

affect not only the tail length but also<br />

body weight gain from days 12 and 21,<br />

the trait which was described in the previous<br />

paper (Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska et<br />

al., 2009). Database searching provided<br />

no evidences to confirm our results for<br />

chromosome 3 and 9, however in this<br />

region <strong>of</strong> genome are QTLs which affected<br />

the skeleton; Lbn3a (long bones 3a)<br />

on chromosome 3, and on chromosome 9<br />

Bdln8 (body length 8) (59 cM) (Vitarius<br />

et al., 2006), Plskt47 (pleiotropic skeletal<br />

traits 47) (66.8 cM) which regulate tibia<br />

length (Kenney-Hunt et al., 2008).<br />

On chromosome 11, the peak LOD<br />

score for tail length was obtained at 25<br />

cM. The similar results for this trait were<br />

reported Rocha et al. (2004), detecting


62 D. Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska, E. Wirth-Dzięciołowska, M. Gajewska<br />

Tlq1 at 22.8 cM. Farber et al. (2007)<br />

also identified on chromosome 11 QTL<br />

influencing tail length-Tailq8 (tail length<br />

QTL 8).<br />

QTL located on chromosome 18 regulated<br />

not only the length <strong>of</strong> tail but also<br />

body weight at 12 days (Łukasiewicz-<br />

-Śmietańska et al., 2009). In this region<br />

on chromosome 18 there is the locus<br />

Lbn16 (long bones 16) (24 cM) mapped<br />

by Norgard et al. (2009), which regulate<br />

the length <strong>of</strong> femur.<br />

For mesenteric fat we detected two<br />

QTL. Near the locus located on chromosome<br />

11 (69 cM), indicated in this study,<br />

there are some interesting loci influencing<br />

fat mass. Prkca (protein kinase C,<br />

alpha) gene is located at 68 cM in mouse<br />

genome. Protein kinase-c alpha is a negative<br />

feedback inhibitor <strong>of</strong> adipocyte differentiation<br />

and insulin signaling (Artemenko<br />

et al., 2005; Ranganathan et al.,<br />

2002; Leitges et al., 2002). Murphy and al.<br />

(2009) observed an association <strong>of</strong> SNPs<br />

within the protein kinase-C alpha gene<br />

(PRKCA) with BMI in people population.<br />

Carlborg et al. (2005) also mapped a QTL<br />

on chromosome 11 which influences fat<br />

weight. They named this QTL as Abfw1<br />

(abdominal fat weight 1) (60 cM).<br />

There have been no publications confirming<br />

our results for the second QTL<br />

for mesenteric fat located on 7 chromosome.<br />

Chromosome 2 showed suggestive<br />

QTL for parametrial fat weight. The<br />

similar results for chromosome 2 were<br />

reported Mehrabian et al. (1998). They<br />

identified at 37 cM the Mob7 (multigenic<br />

obesity 7) QTL which regulates the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> fat.<br />

Loci controlling weight <strong>of</strong> liver were<br />

detected on chromosomes 2 (22 cM) and<br />

3 (3 cM). The location <strong>of</strong> locus mapped<br />

by us on chromosome 3, is similar to that<br />

reported by Leamy et al. (2002). They<br />

identified QTL named Orgwq4 (organ<br />

weight QTL 4) 13.8 cM which regulate<br />

the weight <strong>of</strong> liver. Brockmann et al.<br />

(2004) mapped a loci for liver weight<br />

also on chromosome 2 and 3 (89 i 32 cM<br />

respectively) but the distances from QTL<br />

mapped in our study is too great.<br />

A single suggestive QTL was identified<br />

for adrenal weight on chromosome<br />

7. Weight <strong>of</strong> adrenal glands is a trait<br />

rarely analyzed so it is difficult to<br />

find confirmation for the result, however<br />

on 46 cM <strong>of</strong> chromosome 7 is<br />

a QTL named Org5 (organ weight 5)<br />

(Kenney-Hunt et al., 2006) which<br />

have an impact on this trait.<br />

Loci influencing spleen weight was<br />

mapped on chromosomes 4, 9 and 10. All<br />

three loci are suggestive. Similar results<br />

for chromosome 10 can be found in the<br />

other studies. There are two QTL located<br />

near the 95% CI (confidence interval)<br />

<strong>of</strong> locus identified in this analysis. One<br />

is Org6 (Organ weight 6) (57 cM) and<br />

the other is Swq5 (spleen weight QTL5)<br />

(64 cM) (Kenney-Hunt et al., 2006;<br />

Brockmann et al., 2000).<br />

Our studies have confirmed some<br />

known QTL and identified some novel<br />

in the mouse light and heavy line intercross.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> QTLs detected in present<br />

analysis have a small effect however<br />

some <strong>of</strong> them have confirmation in other<br />

publications so, it is possible to assume<br />

that novel QTLs are the regions <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />

which influence measured traits. In<br />

future experiments will be required a<br />

more detailed mapping studies for QTLs<br />

affecting perigonadal and total internal<br />

fat. There will be interesting to look


Identifi cation <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci... 63<br />

for loci influencing muscle weight and<br />

to understand the relationship between<br />

muscle and fat mass which are the most<br />

important components <strong>of</strong> body weight.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANKRA-BADU G.A., POMP D., SHRINER D.,<br />

ALLISON D.B., YI N., 2009: Genetic influences<br />

on growth and body composition in mice:<br />

multilocus interactions. Int J Obes (Lond).<br />

2009 Jan, 33(1): 89<strong>–</strong>95.<br />

ARTEMENKO Y., GAGNON A., AUBIN D.,<br />

SORISKY A., 2005: Anti-adipogenic effect <strong>of</strong><br />

PDGF is reversed by PKC inhibition. J. Cell.<br />

Physiol. 204, 646<strong>–</strong>653.<br />

BROCKMANN G.A., KARATAYLI E., HALEY<br />

C.S., RENNE U., ROTTMANN O.J., KARLE<br />

S., 2004: Qtls for pre- and postweaning body<br />

weight and body compositoin in selected mice.<br />

Mamm. Genome 15 9 8); 593<strong>–</strong>609.<br />

BROCKMANN G.A., KRATZSCH J., HALEY<br />

C.S., RENNE U., SCHWERIN M., KARLE S.,<br />

2000: Single QTL effects, epistasis, and pleiotropy<br />

account for two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the phenotypic<br />

F(2) variance <strong>of</strong> growth and obesity in DU6i x<br />

DBA/2 mice. Genome Res.; 10(12): 1941<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

CARLBORG O., BROCKMANN G.A., HALEY<br />

C.S., 2005: Simultaneous mapping <strong>of</strong> epistatic<br />

QTL in DU6i x DBA/2 mice., Mamm Genome<br />

Jul; 16(7): 481<strong>–</strong>94.<br />

CHEVERUD J.M., VAUGHN T.T., PLETSCHER<br />

L.S., PERIPATO A.C., ADAMS E.S., ERIK-<br />

SON C.F., KING-ELLISON K.J., 2001: Genetic<br />

architecture <strong>of</strong> adiposity in the cross <strong>of</strong> LG/J<br />

and SM/J inbred mice. Mamm Genome; 12(1):<br />

3<strong>–</strong>12.<br />

CHRISTIANS J.K., BINGHAM V.K., OLIVER<br />

F.K., HEATH T.T., KEIGHTLEY P.D., 2003:<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> a QTL affecting skeletal<br />

size in mice., Mamm Genome; 14(3):1 75<strong>–</strong>83.<br />

EISEN E.J., COFFEY M.T., 1990: Correlated<br />

responses in body composition based on selection<br />

for different indicator traits in mice. J.<br />

Anim. Sci. Nov; 68(11): 3557<strong>–</strong>62.<br />

GAJEWSKA M., RUTKOWSKI R., ŁUKA-<br />

SIEWICZ D., WIRTH- DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA<br />

E., 2002: Differences between C57Bl/6 and<br />

C57Bl/10 inbred mouse strains in chromosomes<br />

2, 4, 13, 17 and 18. <strong>Animal</strong> Sci. Papers<br />

and Reports vol. 20, 3; 175<strong>–</strong>180.<br />

KAUFHOLD A., NIGAM P.K., DHIR R.N.,<br />

SHAPIRO B.H., 2002: Prevention <strong>of</strong> latently<br />

expressed CYP2C11, CYP3A2, and growth<br />

hormone defects in neonatally monosodium<br />

glutamate-treated male rats by the N-methyl-<br />

-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dizocilpine maleate.<br />

J Pharmacol Exp Ther.; 302(2): 490<strong>–</strong>6.<br />

KENNEY-HUNT J.P., VAUGHN T.T., PLE-<br />

TSCHER L.S., PERIPATO A., ROUTMAN E.,<br />

COTHRAN K., DURAND D., NORGARD E.,<br />

PEREL C., CHEVERUD J.M. 2006: Quantitative<br />

trait loci for body size components in mice.<br />

Mamm Genome.; 17(6): 526<strong>–</strong>37.<br />

KNOTT S.A., HALEY C.S., 2000: Multitrait<br />

least squares for quantitative trait loci detection.<br />

Genetics.; 156: 899<strong>–</strong>911.<br />

LEAMY L.J., POMP D., EISEN E.J., CHEVERUD<br />

J.M., (2002: Pleiotropy <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci<br />

for organ weights and limb bone lengths in<br />

mice. Physiol Genomics. 12; 10(1): 21<strong>–</strong>9.<br />

LEITGES M., PLOMANN M., STANDAERT<br />

M.L., BANDYOPADHYAY G., SAJAN M.P.,<br />

KANOH Y., FARESE R.V., 2002: Knockout <strong>of</strong><br />

PKC alpha enhances insulin signaling through<br />

PI3K. Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 847<strong>–</strong>858.<br />

LUND M.S., SORENSEN P., GULDBRANDT-<br />

SEN B., SORENSEN D.A., 2003: Multitrait<br />

fine mapping <strong>of</strong> quantitative traits loci using<br />

combined linkage disequilibria and linkage<br />

analysis. Genetics.; 163: 405<strong>–</strong>410.<br />

ŁUKASIEWICZ-ŚMIETAŃSKA D., WIRTH-<br />

-DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., GAJEWSKA M.,<br />

2009: Identification <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait loci<br />

for body weight and body weight gain in two<br />

growth-differentiated mouse lines. Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sc. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. No 46:<br />

177<strong>–</strong>183.<br />

MEHRABIAN M., WEN P.Z., FISLER J., DA-<br />

VIS R.C., LUSIS A.J., 1998: Genetic loci controlling<br />

body fat, lipoprotein metabolism, and<br />

insulin levels in a multifactorial mousemodel.<br />

J Clin Invest. 1; 101(11): 2485<strong>–</strong>96.<br />

MURPHY A., TANTISIRA K.G., SOTO-QUI-<br />

RÓS M.E., AVILA L., KLANDERMAN B.J.,<br />

LAKE S., WEISS S.T., CELEDÓN J.C., 2009:<br />

PRKCA: A Positional Candidate Gene for Body<br />

Mass Index and Asthma.; Am. J. Hum. Genet.;<br />

85(1): 87<strong>–</strong>96. Epub 2009 Jul 2. Erratum in:<br />

Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, Aug; 85(2): 302.


64 D. Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska, E. Wirth-Dzięciołowska, M. Gajewska<br />

NORGARD E.A., JARVIS J.P., ROSEMAN<br />

C.C., MAXWELL T.J., KENNEY-HUNT J.P.,<br />

SAMOCHA K.E., PLETSCHER L.S., WANG<br />

B., FAWCETT G.L., LEATHERWOOD C.J.,<br />

WOLF J.B., CHEVERUD J.M., 2009: Replication<br />

<strong>of</strong> long-bone length QTL in the F9-F10<br />

LG,SM advanced intercross. Mamm Genome.;<br />

20(4): 224<strong>–</strong>35.<br />

PEREZ-ENCISO M., MISZTAL I., 2004: “Qxpak:<br />

a versatile mixed model application for genetical<br />

genomics and QTL analyses”. Bioinformatics<br />

20(16): 2792<strong>–</strong>2798.<br />

RADOMSKA M.J., SŁAWIŃSKI T., WIRTH-<br />

-DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., 1970a: On heterosis<br />

resulting from crossing <strong>of</strong> certain inbred strains<br />

<strong>of</strong> laboratory mice. I Simple cross reciprocal<br />

hybrids Genet. Pol., 11, 1, 131<strong>–</strong>143.<br />

RADOMSKA M.J., SŁAWIŃSKI T., WIRTH-<br />

DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., 1970b: On heterosis<br />

resulting from crossing <strong>of</strong> certain inbred strains<br />

<strong>of</strong> laboratory mice. II Double cross reciprocal<br />

hybrids Genet. Pol., 11, 1, 145<strong>–</strong>153.<br />

RANGANATHAN G., SONG W., DEAN N.,<br />

MONIA B., BARGER S.W., KERN P.A., 2002:<br />

Regulation <strong>of</strong> lipoprotein lipase by protein kinase<br />

C alpha in 3T3<strong>–</strong>F442A adipocytes. J. Biol.<br />

Chem. 277, 38669<strong>–</strong>38675.<br />

ROCHA J.L., EISEN E.J., VAN VLECK L.D.,<br />

POMP D., 2004: A large-sample QTL study in<br />

mice: II. Body composition. Mamm Genome.;<br />

15(2): 100<strong>–</strong>13.<br />

SŁAWIŃSKI T., 1974: Wpływ genotypu i efektu<br />

matki na ciężar ciała w okresie wzrostu postnatalnego<br />

( na przykładzie myszy laboratoryjnych).<br />

Zeszyty naukowe AR. Warszawa.<br />

VITARIUS J.A., SEHAYEK E., BRESLOW<br />

J.L., 2006: Identification <strong>of</strong> quantitative trait<br />

loci affecting body composition in a mouse intercross.,<br />

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 103(52):<br />

19860<strong>–</strong>5.<br />

WIRTH-DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., FABIJAŃSKA<br />

M., KARASZEWSKA J., CZUMIŃSKA K.,<br />

1997: Dynamics <strong>of</strong> growth and changes occurring<br />

with age in mice selected for body weight<br />

for 90 generations on the 21st day od life Ann.<br />

<strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricult. Univ.-<strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 33;<br />

55<strong>–</strong>67.<br />

WIRTH- DZIĘCIOŁOWSKA E., CZUMIŃSKA<br />

K., 2000: Longevity and ageing <strong>of</strong> mice from<br />

lines divergently selected for body weight for<br />

over 90 generations. Biogerontology, vol. 1, 2:<br />

169<strong>–</strong>176.<br />

Streszczenie: Identyfikacja loci cech ilościowych<br />

dla masy narządów oraz masy tłuszczu w liniach<br />

hodowanych przeciwstawnie na masę ciała. Poszukiwanie<br />

loci regulujących masę narządów oraz<br />

masę tłuszczu prowadzono przy użyciu dwóch linii<br />

L oraz C uzyskanych dzięki przekrzyżowaniu czterech<br />

szczepów wsobnych. Zmapowano pięć sugestywnych<br />

loci determinujących długość ogona,<br />

dwa loci regulujące masę wątroby oraz masę tłuszczu<br />

okołojelitowego, jedno locus mające wpływ na<br />

masę tłuszczu macicy, trzustki, nerek i nadnerczy<br />

oraz trzy loci warunkujące masę śledziony.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Dorota Łukasiewicz-Śmietańska,<br />

Elżbieta Wirth-Dzięciołowska<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Ogólnej Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

Wydział Nauk o Zwierzętach <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Marta Gajewska<br />

Zakład Genetyki i Hodowli Zwierząt Laboratoryjnych<br />

Centrum Onkologii <strong>–</strong> Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie<br />

w Warszawie<br />

ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 65<strong>–</strong>69<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Fibre characteristics <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpaca bred at the age <strong>of</strong> 1 year<br />

ANNA MORALES VILLAVICENCIO, ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI,<br />

PIOTR PIETRZYKOWSKI, MARIUSZ WIERZBICKI<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Fibre characteristics <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpaca<br />

bred at the age <strong>of</strong> 1 year. Alpacas are known all<br />

over the world as a producers <strong>of</strong> thin fiber. Except<br />

the South America they are mainly bred in Australia,<br />

Canada, New Zealand, USA and also in<br />

Europe, including Poland. The fiber obtained from<br />

annual alpacas belongs the thinnest category, which<br />

is called “bebe alpaca” and in accordance with<br />

Peruvian standard the fibre diameter should not<br />

exceed 23 microns. The aim <strong>of</strong> presented paper is<br />

to explain in purpose for further selection, whether<br />

imported alpacas from Chile give <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong><br />

a thin fiber. The fiber samples were collected<br />

from veil <strong>of</strong> 1-year old alpacas (n = 30) in 2007 to<br />

measure their average diameters. The fibre length<br />

was investigated on fleece <strong>of</strong> live animals. Collected<br />

samples were divided into 3 groups due<br />

to the intensity <strong>of</strong> color, each group included 10<br />

samples. The fibre samples <strong>of</strong> both sexes were<br />

equally represented: 15 females and 15 males.<br />

The group <strong>of</strong> bright fibers included white, cream<br />

and beige, middle dark fibers included all shades<br />

<strong>of</strong> brown and in the darkest dark, gray and black.<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the fibre length, the average<br />

length was 11.92 cm and statistically was<br />

much more longer in males (12.38 cm) than in<br />

females (11.46 cm). In case <strong>of</strong> color the diameter<br />

<strong>of</strong> all measured fibers (n = 30) was on average<br />

21.32 microns. Bright and middle dark fibers,<br />

which thickness was 20.92 and 20.72 microns,<br />

respectively, appeared to be high significantly<br />

(p ≤ 0.01) thinner comparing to 24.43 microns in<br />

the dark fiber. In case <strong>of</strong> sex, females had thinner<br />

fiber (21.34) than males (22.30) but the differences<br />

were not statistically approved. Among<br />

investigated alpacas 43% fell into the category <strong>of</strong><br />

“bebe alpaca’, remaining the abovementioned<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> thickness.<br />

Key words: alpaca, wool, fibre, diameter, length.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Alpacas are known in the world -due to<br />

their ability to production <strong>of</strong> very thin<br />

fiber, which is characterized by the fact<br />

that it is three times more durable and<br />

six times warmer than wool <strong>of</strong> sheep.<br />

Alpaca fiber occurs in 22 natural colors<br />

from white to black with many shades <strong>of</strong><br />

beige and brown. In the world’s population<br />

the 86% <strong>of</strong> alpacas are <strong>of</strong> a white<br />

fiber (Brenes et al., 2001, MINAG<br />

2009). Fiber obtained from the 1 year old<br />

alpaca is eligible for a so-called thinnest<br />

“bebe alpaca” and according to Peruvian<br />

standards should not exceed more than<br />

23 microns. (Norma Tecnica Peruana,<br />

2004: NTP 231301)<br />

Fiber thickness determines its price<br />

in procurement. Therefore from an economic<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view, it is desirable that<br />

alpacas produce a very thin fiber. Alpacas<br />

depending on the genetic value <strong>of</strong> animals,<br />

are able to produce fiber <strong>of</strong> a thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> 18 to 30 microns. In textile industry<br />

the fibre length is also important. The<br />

fibre length <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpaca breed is<br />

6<strong>–</strong>12 cm <strong>of</strong> annual growth in average.<br />

The largest population <strong>of</strong> alpacas in the<br />

world is in Peru and in this country the


66 A. Morales Villavicencio et al.<br />

fibre standards for the purchasing aims<br />

were established. The idea in trade is that<br />

thefinest fiber gets the higher the price.<br />

Alpacas population outside the South-<br />

-American continent started increasing<br />

in the early 90’s <strong>of</strong> XX century. Currently,<br />

alpacas are bred on all continents, including<br />

Europe (Lupton et al., 2006; Morales<br />

Villavicencio, Niżnikowski, 2006) as well<br />

as Poland.<br />

Alpacas were imported to Poland<br />

in 2004 from Chile. It is estimated that<br />

in Poland there are about 400 heads <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas. Most <strong>of</strong> them is breed on two<br />

large farms in the regions <strong>of</strong> the Podlaskie<br />

and Wielkopolska. The rest <strong>of</strong> that population<br />

is spread throughout the country,<br />

mainly for touristic purposes. Currently<br />

in the world, there is strong demand for<br />

alpaca fiber, but its price in procurement<br />

depends on the diameter, color and fashion<br />

trends. According to the Peruvian<br />

alpaca fiber standards are divided into<br />

four categories <strong>of</strong> fibre quality (Tab. 1).<br />

TABLE 1. Categories alpaca fiber in Peru (NTP<br />

231.301 <strong>–</strong> 2004)<br />

Category Fibre diameter<br />

(μm)<br />

Fibre lenght<br />

(mm)<br />

Extra fine > 23 65<br />

Fine 23.1 <strong>–</strong> 26.5 70<br />

Medium fine 26.6 <strong>–</strong> 29 70<br />

Fat 29 > 70<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to verify<br />

whether the imported alpacas gave <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

with a thin fiber, to carry out further<br />

selection.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The coat samples were collected in 2007<br />

from Huacaya alpacas in the two largest<br />

farms in Poland. The research material<br />

was a group <strong>of</strong> 30 alpacas <strong>of</strong> both sexes<br />

<strong>of</strong> different coat colors at age <strong>of</strong> 1 year,<br />

which were born in Poland.<br />

Alpacas’ farm in the region <strong>of</strong> Wielkopolska<br />

fiber samples were taken from<br />

8 heads, and on the 22 head in Podlasie<br />

The study selected alpacas <strong>of</strong> both sexes,<br />

<strong>of</strong> up to 15 head <strong>of</strong> females males, respectively.<br />

Alpacas (n = 30) were divided<br />

into 3 groups depending on the fiber<br />

color intensity. The first group consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> a bright alpaca fiber which included:<br />

white, cream and light brown, the second<br />

group consisted <strong>of</strong> alpaca fiber with<br />

a medium to dark shades <strong>of</strong> brown, and<br />

a third <strong>of</strong> the darkest alpacas’ fiber (dark<br />

brown, gray and black).<br />

The basic fiber length was measured<br />

on live animals using a measuring tape.<br />

Fibre samples were collected from the<br />

alpaca veil during shearing. Each sample<br />

prior to microscopic examination was<br />

washed in warm water with detergent and<br />

rinsed several times. After natural drying<br />

the fibers were cut with scissors in order<br />

to prepare the samples for microscopic<br />

measurements. The diameter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fibers were measured on a microscope<br />

projection <strong>of</strong> 600 fibers in each sample.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> fiber length and diameter<br />

have been collected in a database.<br />

The obtained results have allowed to<br />

assess the percentage <strong>of</strong> animals, where<br />

the fiber was located in the category <strong>of</strong><br />

“bebe alpaca”.<br />

Statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> herd,<br />

sex, color, fiber and color x sex interaction<br />

on the fiber thickness and fiber length <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas wool were calculated using the<br />

least square method (LSM) using SPSS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware v. 14.0 was measured and the<br />

statistical differences between groups<br />

alpacas. The applied model was as fol-


Fibre characteristics <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpaca breed... 67<br />

lowing: y ijkl = μ + a i + b j + c k + bc jk + e ijkl ;<br />

where: y ijkl <strong>–</strong> test feature; μ <strong>–</strong> arithmetic<br />

mean; a i <strong>–</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> herd (i = 1.2);<br />

b j <strong>–</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> alpacas (j =<br />

= female, male); c k <strong>–</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

color <strong>of</strong> fibers (k = dark, light, medium);<br />

bc jk <strong>–</strong> interaction effect <strong>of</strong> the sex-and-<br />

-from the color and e ijkl <strong>–</strong> error.<br />

Measured core length and thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fibers and also defined the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> alpacas<strong>of</strong> which fall within the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> “bebe alpaca”.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Examined some parameters <strong>of</strong> alpaca<br />

fiber, which affect the price and determined<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> animals tested<br />

in accordance with the Peruvian standard<br />

falls in the category <strong>of</strong> “bebe alpaca”, and<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> the factors<br />

and results <strong>of</strong> the analyzed traitswere<br />

summarized in the table and graphs.<br />

Based on studies <strong>of</strong> fiber length, it was<br />

found that the average annual growth<br />

was 11.92 cm and was highly statistically<br />

higher (p ≤ 0.01) in males (12.36 cm) than<br />

in females (11.46 cm) as it was shown<br />

in Table 2 and Figure 1. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

color, it was found that the diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

all measured fibers (n = 30) was on average<br />

21.82 microns.<br />

Regarding the effect <strong>of</strong> color on the<br />

studied traits, no correlation between the<br />

color <strong>of</strong> fiber and its length were found,<br />

but it must have been noted that the thin<br />

fibers were in the group <strong>of</strong> light color,<br />

which average thickness was 20.319 mm,<br />

followed by a medium-dark, 20.713 mm<br />

and the thickest fibers with a diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

TABLE 2. The influence <strong>of</strong> some factors and interactions on the studied traits (n = 30)<br />

Traits<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong>:<br />

Interaction<br />

herd sex coat color sex x color<br />

X SE<br />

Fibre diameter (μm) NS NS XX NS 21.82 0.52<br />

Lenght fo fibre (cm) NS XX NS NS 11.92 0.17<br />

Statistical significance at: XX <strong>–</strong> (p ≤ 0.01); NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

25<br />

22.303<br />

21.342<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

12.38<br />

11.46<br />

females<br />

females<br />

5<br />

0<br />

fiber diameter (μm)<br />

fiber lenght (cm)<br />

FIURE 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on the thickness and length <strong>of</strong> alpaca fiber (p ≤ 0.01)


68 A. Morales Villavicencio et al.<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

20.319<br />

A<br />

20.713<br />

A<br />

24.434<br />

BC<br />

15<br />

10<br />

11.958 12.076 12.076<br />

bright<br />

middle dark<br />

dark<br />

5<br />

0<br />

fiber diameter (μm)<br />

fibre lenght (cm)<br />

FIGURE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> color on the thickness and length <strong>of</strong> fibers in alpaca<br />

24.00 mm belonged to the category <strong>of</strong><br />

dark fibre (Fig. 2).<br />

Analyzing the effect <strong>of</strong> sex on the<br />

studied traits it was found that females<br />

(n = 15) had a thinner fiber (21.93 mm)<br />

than males (22.84 mm), but the differences<br />

were not statistically significant.<br />

Other studies conducted in Peru on<br />

alpacas reported (De Los Rios 2006;<br />

NTP 231 301 <strong>–</strong> 2004) that 20% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

produced fiber came from alpaca <strong>of</strong><br />

a thick fiber, 46% <strong>of</strong> medium fine, 22%<br />

<strong>of</strong> fine and 12% <strong>of</strong> “bebe alpaca”. Alpacas<br />

at age <strong>of</strong> 1 year <strong>of</strong> both sexes (Fig. 1)<br />

received a fibers diameter which allows<br />

to classify them to the first category. As<br />

it was reported in the studies on alpacas<br />

(McGregor et al., 2000) and the llamas<br />

(Morales Villavicencio, Radzik-Rant,<br />

2005), the fibre diameter increases while<br />

the animals get older. The examined<br />

alpacas <strong>of</strong> “bebe” fibre might be used in<br />

the reproduction due to the heritability <strong>of</strong><br />

the very fine fibres. The results obtained<br />

will be used to carry out further selection<br />

in the herds.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

1. Alpacas imported from Chile adapted<br />

well in Poland conditions and provided<br />

a good genetic material, as producers<br />

<strong>of</strong> thin fibers.<br />

2. The Huacaya breed alpaca tested, 43%<br />

were located in accordance with the<br />

standard Peruvian in the category <strong>of</strong><br />

thin fibers, which is very attractive<br />

from an economic point <strong>of</strong> view to<br />

encouraging further breeding work.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BRENES E.R., MADRIGAL K, PÉREZ F., VAL-<br />

LADARES K., 2001: El Cluster de los Camélidos<br />

en Perú: Diagnóstico Competitivo y Recomendaciones<br />

Estratégicas. Instituto Centroamericano<br />

de Administración de Empresas, 1<strong>–</strong>71.<br />

DE LOS RIOS E., 2006: Producción textil de fibras<br />

de camélidos sudamericanos en el área alto-andina<br />

de Bolivia, Ecuador y Perú. Organización<br />

de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo<br />

Industrial.<br />

LUPTON C.J. et al., 2006: Fiber characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the Huacaya Alpaca. Small Ruminant Research<br />

64: 211<strong>–</strong>224.


Fibre characteristics <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpaca breed... 69<br />

MC GREGOR B.A., BUTLER K.L., 2004: Sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> variation in fibre diameter attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

Australian alpacas and implications for fleece<br />

evaluation and animal selection. Australian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research 55: 433<strong>–</strong>442.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., RADZIK-<br />

-RANT A., 2005: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> selected<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> hair from Llamas (Lama glama)<br />

kept at <strong>Warsaw</strong> ZOO. <strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricultural<br />

<strong>University</strong>, <strong>Animal</strong> Science 43, 35<strong>–</strong>39.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻNIKOW-<br />

SKI R., 2006: Populacja wielbłądowatych południowoamerykańskich<br />

na świecie. Przegląd<br />

Hodowlany. 6, 16<strong>–</strong>19.<br />

MINAG 2009: http://minag.gov.pe<br />

NORMA TECNICA PERUANA 2004: NTP<br />

231.301. Fibra de Alpaca Clasificada <strong>–</strong> Definiciones,<br />

clasificación por grupos de calidades,<br />

requisitos y rotulado. INDECOPI. Perú.<br />

SPSS <strong>–</strong> Statistical Product and Service Solutions:<br />

Base version 12.0 for Windows, inc. USA,<br />

2004.<br />

Streszczenie: Charakterystyka okrywy włosowej<br />

jednorocznych alpak rasy huacaya. Badaniami<br />

objęto 30 jednorocznych alpak rasy huacaya o różnych<br />

kolorach okrywy, które pochodziły z dwóch<br />

największych stad w Polsce (8 szt.) z Wielkopolski<br />

i (22 szt.) z Podlasia. Matki badanych jednorocznych<br />

alpak importowane były z Chile. Zmierzono<br />

podstawową długość oraz grubość włókien,<br />

a ponadto określono procentowy udział alpak<br />

mieszczących się w kategorii „bebe alpaca”. Wyniki<br />

badań długości włókna wykazały, że średni<br />

roczny przyrost był wysoce statystycznie dłuższy<br />

u samców niż u samic. Badając wpływ koloru na<br />

badane cechy odnotowano, że najcieńsze włókna<br />

należały do grupy jasnych, następnie średniociemne<br />

i najgrubsze włókna należały do kategorii<br />

ciemnych. Przebadane jednoroczne alpaki obu<br />

płci (wykres 1) uzyskały średnicę włókna która<br />

pozwala na kwalifikację do pierwszej kategorii<br />

i mogą uczestniczyć w dalszym etapie reprodukcji<br />

jako producenci cienkiego włókna.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Author’s address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland.<br />

e-mail: anna_morales_villavicencio@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 71<strong>–</strong>78<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Estimated share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya alpaca fleece<br />

ANNA MORALES VILLAVICENCIO, ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI,<br />

PIOTR PIETRZYKOWSKI<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Estimated share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya<br />

alpaca fl eece. Research concerned/took up a group<br />

<strong>of</strong> 25 alpacas <strong>of</strong> Huacaya race, coming from different<br />

herds, imported from Chile. The shearing<br />

took place in 2009. The fleece was weighed and<br />

classified by categories <strong>of</strong> body parts accordingly.<br />

The average estimated weigh <strong>of</strong> fleece was 1.78 kg<br />

and the veil made up 0.650 kg. Influence <strong>of</strong> gender,<br />

age, colour on mass <strong>of</strong> veil and its proportional<br />

part in comparison to the other part <strong>of</strong> fleece<br />

and bifactor interactions age × colour were investigated,<br />

but statistically essential differences were<br />

not shown. In the investigated population males<br />

had thinner fleece 2.2 kg and veil 0.7 kg than<br />

females which amount to 1.55 and 0.455 and its<br />

proportional part was qualified properly on 34.45<br />

with males and 31.75 with females. In case <strong>of</strong> age<br />

the thinnest fleece had eight-year and three-year<br />

alpacas and its proportional part equal to: 38.05<br />

and 37.26. The heaviest fleece came from white<br />

alpacas and weighed 2.21 kg on average, veil part<br />

was estimated as 36.23%.<br />

Key words: alpaca, fibre, weight <strong>of</strong> fleece, shearing.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Alpacas (Llama Pacos) in Poland are the<br />

perfect alternative in income giving animal<br />

production. These animals imported from<br />

Chile are widely used for various purposes.<br />

The main product gained from them<br />

is fibre, but meat is also edible and has<br />

high nutritious value. Gentle character<br />

<strong>of</strong> alpacas permits using them in tourism<br />

and recreation (Morales Villavicencio,<br />

Niżnikowski, 2008). The mass <strong>of</strong> alpacas’<br />

fibre is an important component from the<br />

economic point <strong>of</strong> view. Single alpaca<br />

after one-year shearing can give approximately<br />

2<strong>–</strong>5 kg <strong>of</strong> fibre in relation to the<br />

body part. Alpacas’ fleece is divided into<br />

4 categories, similarly to the Peruvian<br />

standard. The first category makes up the<br />

thinnest fibres from the back and sides<br />

also called as “veil”. Basic features <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas’ fibre, which are essential for the<br />

textile industry, are thickness and length.<br />

Fleece mass is the next important factor<br />

for breeder from the economical point <strong>of</strong><br />

view. The income from the alpaca breeding<br />

depends on varying thickness, length<br />

and fleece mass. Alpacas coming from<br />

the traditional farm located in higher<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> Andy Mountains characterize<br />

worse quality <strong>of</strong> fibre than those alpacas,<br />

which were bred in semi-intensive conditions.<br />

In harsh conditions <strong>of</strong> alpine<br />

areas, harvest <strong>of</strong> fibre from two-year-old<br />

alpacas equals around 2.1 kg, while in<br />

mildly average climate year-old alpaca<br />

gives up to 2.3 kg. (MINAG 2009). The<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> veil acquired from Peruvian<br />

alpacas seemed worse with years in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the mass and fibre diameter<br />

(De Los Rios, 2006), however there are


72 A. Morales Villavicencio, R. Niżnikowski, P. Pietrzykowski<br />

herds in Peru with high quality fibre and<br />

heavy veil. The variations in veil mass<br />

and fibre diameter depend on the fodder<br />

quantity and other factors (Brayant et<br />

al., 1989; McGregor, 2002). Alpacas’ veil<br />

mass and its thickness also rely on the<br />

age and gender. Males produce more<br />

fibre than females, moreover, veil mass<br />

increases with the age. (Castellaro et<br />

al., 1998; Wulij et al., 2000; McGregor,<br />

2006; Lupton et al., 2006). The aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> the research was the proportional<br />

qualification <strong>of</strong> veil and other parts <strong>of</strong><br />

alpacas’ fleece <strong>of</strong> Huacaya race at the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 2<strong>–</strong>8 years and selecting animals<br />

characterised by thick and heavy fleece<br />

for the further reproduction. The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the research will guide the selection <strong>of</strong><br />

alpaca’s population in the future.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The research was conducted on 25<br />

Huacaya alpacas bred on the polish farm,<br />

<strong>of</strong> both gender at the age <strong>of</strong> 2 to 8 years<br />

in 6 fibre colours, all imported from<br />

Chile. Sheared fibre in the year <strong>of</strong> 2009<br />

has been divided into categories: veil,<br />

neck, thigh and rest (fibre from belly and<br />

limbs), which have a lower market price<br />

(Picture 1, Worked out on the basic Peruvian<br />

standard). All parts <strong>of</strong> fibre from<br />

each alpaca were weight on an electronic<br />

scale, aiming to estimate the percentage<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> each animal. Among<br />

investigated alpaca population were 16<br />

females and 9 males. The range <strong>of</strong> age<br />

was from 2 to 8 years. The most common<br />

among the group were 2 and 7 years old<br />

alpacas, each per 7 units, followed by 6<br />

and 8 years old, each per 2 units, 3 units<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 year olds and 4 units <strong>of</strong> 4 year olds.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> colour variation there were 2<br />

PICTURE 1. Categories fleece alpacas worked<br />

on basis NTP 231.301 (Morales Villavicencio M.,<br />

2010)<br />

white alpacas, 2 grey <strong>–</strong> heath, 3 brown,<br />

5 grey, 6 black and 7 light brown. Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> statistical influence factors such<br />

us: age, colour and gender and bifactor<br />

interactions age and colour according to<br />

example with using SPSS Base version<br />

12.0 for Windows, inc. USA, 2004 has<br />

been conducted. y ijkl = μ + a i + b j +c k +<br />

bc jk + e ijkl ; where: yijkl <strong>–</strong> test feature;<br />

μ <strong>–</strong> arithmetic mean; a i <strong>–</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

sex <strong>of</strong> alpacas (j = female, male); b j <strong>–</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> age <strong>of</strong> alpacas c k <strong>–</strong> the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> the color <strong>of</strong> fibers (k = black, b cjk<br />

<strong>–</strong> interaction effect <strong>of</strong> the age and <strong>–</strong> from<br />

the colour and e ijkl <strong>–</strong> error.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Table 1 has introduced the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

age, colour and gender on investigated<br />

features, however it did not prove statistically<br />

important differences. The<br />

shearing obtained 44.62 kg <strong>of</strong> fibre from


Estimated share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya alpaca fl eece 73<br />

which 14.68 kg came from the veil (Fig.<br />

1). It determined over 33% total fibres<br />

mass obtained from shearing. It is rather<br />

low result taking into attention that the<br />

veil makes up the largest proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

body surface (Fig. 2). From investigation<br />

conducted on alpacas from Chile<br />

it appears that average fibre production<br />

from alpaca results to 1.8 kg yearly, but<br />

the season has rather high influence, so<br />

in rainy season on a good pasture, the<br />

fibre production may increase by 0.6 kg<br />

(Bonacic, 1991).<br />

Among gathered population, the average<br />

animal veil participation resulted in<br />

33.26% at average mass 0.650 kg; neck<br />

18.23 % at average mass 0.362 kg; limbs<br />

22.24% at average mass 0.435 kg and<br />

other 26.26% a average mass 0.503 kg<br />

(Fig. 3). The fibre acquired from males<br />

was heavier and in average obtained<br />

2.2 kg in comparison to females 1.55 kg<br />

TABLE 1. The influence <strong>of</strong> some factors and interactions on the studied traits (n = 25)<br />

Traits<br />

Effect<br />

Interaction<br />

Statistics<br />

sex age coat color age × color X SE<br />

Veil NS NS NS NS 0.650 0.034<br />

Neck NS NS NS NS 0.362 0.037<br />

Thigh NS NS NS NS 0.435 0.038<br />

Rest NS NS NS NS 0.503 0.026<br />

Total 1.949 0.064<br />

Share (%)<br />

Veil NS NS NS NS 33.264 1.543<br />

Neck NS NS NS NS 18.231 1.884<br />

Thigh NS NS NS NS 22.243 1.800<br />

Rest NS NS NS NS 26.262 1.751<br />

Statistical significance at: XX <strong>–</strong> (p ≤ 0.01); NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

14.68 9 9.5 11.44<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

veil neck thigh rest<br />

FIE 1. ei ght breed huacaya alpacas fleeces from different parts <strong>of</strong> the body (kg)


74 A. Morales Villavicencio, R. Niżnikowski, P. Pietrzykowski<br />

25.63<br />

32.9<br />

veil<br />

neck<br />

thigh<br />

rest<br />

21.3<br />

20.17<br />

FIGURE 2. The percentage <strong>of</strong> alpacas veil in comparison to other parts <strong>of</strong> the fleece<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

white light grey greyheath<br />

brown black<br />

brown<br />

FIGURE 3. Alpacas fleece weight divided into the colors <strong>of</strong> various body (kg)<br />

veil<br />

neck<br />

thigh<br />

rest<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

Females<br />

Males<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

veil neck thigh rest<br />

FIGURE 4. Weight <strong>of</strong> individual cover lots <strong>of</strong> alpacas by gender (kg)<br />

at average veil mass resulted 0.751 kg and<br />

0.455 kg accordingly. Veil part in comparison<br />

to other fibre parts equals in average<br />

33% and was higher for males 34.45 than<br />

for the females 31.75% (Fig. 4). Figure 5<br />

shows, that the biggest veil participation<br />

rate in total fibre mass had males 34.45%,<br />

while females 31.75%. The heaviest<br />

alpaca veil had come from eight-year-<br />

-olds and three-year-olds (Fig. 6) and


Estimated share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya alpaca fl eece 75<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Females<br />

Males<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

veil neck thigh rest<br />

FIGURE 5. The percentage <strong>of</strong> alpacas veil by gender<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

veil<br />

neck<br />

thigh<br />

rest<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

2 3 4 6 7 8<br />

age<br />

FIGURE 6. Weight veil alpacas depending on age<br />

next four-year, two-year, six-year, and<br />

seven-year-olds as follows: 0.77 kg;<br />

0.746 kg; 0.695 kg; 0.571 kg; 0.54 kg<br />

and 0.434 kg. The biggest proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

veil part (Fig. 7) was matched to eight-<br />

-years old alpacas 38.05 and three-years<br />

old alpacas 37.26 and was significantly<br />

smaller at six-years old alpacas 35;<br />

four-years old alpacas 33.02; two-years<br />

old alpacas 32.44; and seven-years old


76 A. Morales Villavicencio, R. Niżnikowski, P. Pietrzykowski<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

veil<br />

neck<br />

thigh<br />

rest<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2 3 4 6 7 8<br />

age<br />

FIGURE 7. Participation veil alpacas depending on age<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

veil<br />

neck<br />

thigh<br />

rest<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

white light grey greyheath<br />

brown<br />

brown<br />

FIGURE 8. Percentage veil alpacas depending on color<br />

black<br />

alpacas 28.75%. From investigations<br />

conducted by Ccopa (1980) it appears<br />

that alpacas veil mass is directly connected<br />

with age. Velarde et al. (1998)<br />

noticed that the veil growth spurs last till<br />

the fourth year <strong>of</strong> alpaca’s life, goes down<br />

during the fifth year and remains on that<br />

level till the sixth year old <strong>of</strong> alpaca’s<br />

life, where it slows down inconsiderably.<br />

In investigated population there<br />

was wide age range but the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

investigated alpacas by age groups was<br />

too small. In case <strong>of</strong> colour the heaviest<br />

fibre was acquired from white alpacas<br />

which weight on average 2.21 kg, followed<br />

by grey-heather 2.11, brown 1.99,<br />

black 1.766, grey 1.744 and the lightest<br />

brown 1.525 kg. Alpaca veil mass in


Estimated share <strong>of</strong> veil part in Huacaya alpaca fl eece 77<br />

white colour equals in average 0.82 kg<br />

and was lower than published by Quispe<br />

et al. 2007 who conducted research on<br />

547 white alpacas and gained average<br />

veil mass <strong>of</strong> 2.303 kg. Proportional veil<br />

part in case <strong>of</strong> fibre colour introduced<br />

on Figure 8, which shows that it was the<br />

highest in case white alpacas 36.23%.<br />

Next it was grey fibre 35.74%, grey-<br />

-heather 32.9, black 32.04%, light brown<br />

31.2% and brown 30.25%. The results<br />

<strong>of</strong> research would make up the base in<br />

alpacas selection in an analysed herd.<br />

Obtained results are not impressive,<br />

although it must be noticed that alpacas<br />

were brought from different farms and<br />

their numbers do not allow an objective<br />

comparison.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

1. Proportional participation rate <strong>of</strong> veil<br />

part in an investigated alpaca group<br />

was estimated as low, taking into attention<br />

body area it fills.<br />

2. The thickest fibre has been acquired<br />

from white alpacas and their proportional<br />

veil share was the highest.<br />

3. Males had noticeably heavier fibre<br />

and its proportional share was higher<br />

too.<br />

4. Alpacas’ age has a significant influence<br />

on veil mass and its proportional<br />

share.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BONACIC S.C., 1991: Características biológicas<br />

y productivas de los camélidos sudamericanos.<br />

Avances en Medicina Veterinaria, Vol. 6(2),<br />

Julio-Diciembre 1991.<br />

BRYANT F.C. et al., 1989: Sheep and alpaca productivity<br />

on high andean rangelands in Peru.<br />

Journal <strong>Animal</strong> Science 67: 3078<strong>–</strong>3095.<br />

CASTELLARO G. et al., 1998: Alpaca live<br />

weight variations and fiber production in<br />

Mediterranean range <strong>of</strong> Chile. Journal Range<br />

Management 51: 509<strong>–</strong>513.<br />

CCOPA V., 1980: Peso vivo, peso de vellón y rendimiento<br />

de vellón en alpacas. Tesis de medico<br />

Veterinario. Puno Univ. Nacional del Altiplano.<br />

DE LOS RIOS E., 2006: Producción textil de<br />

fibras de camélidos sudamericanos en el área<br />

alto-andina de Bolivia, Ecuador y Perú. Organización<br />

de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo<br />

Industrial.<br />

LUPTON C.J., et al. 2006: Fiber characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the Huacaya Alpaca. Small Ruminant Research<br />

64: 211<strong>–</strong>224.<br />

McGREGOR B.A., 2002: Comparative productivity<br />

and grazing behaviour <strong>of</strong> Huacaya alpacas<br />

and Peppin Merino sheep grazed on annual pastures.<br />

Small Ruminant Research 61: 93<strong>–</strong>111.<br />

McGREGOR B.A., BUTLER K.L., 2004: Sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> variation in fibre diameter attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

Australian alpacas and implications for fleece<br />

evaluation and animal selection. Australian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research 55: 433<strong>–</strong>442.<br />

McGREGOR B.A., 2006: Production attributes<br />

and relative value <strong>of</strong> alpaca<br />

fleeces in southern Australia and implications for<br />

industry development.<br />

Small Ruminant Research 61: 93<strong>–</strong>111.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO A., NIŻNI-<br />

KOWSKI R., 2008: Lamy i alpaki alternatywą<br />

w produkcji zwierzęcej. Wieś Jutra, Nr 11(124),<br />

29<strong>–</strong>31.<br />

MORALES VILLAVICENCIO M., 2010: Rysunek<br />

1 opracowany na podstawie norm peruwiańskich.<br />

MINAG 2009.<br />

NORMA TECNICA PERUANA 2004: NTP<br />

231.301. Fibra de Alpaca Clasificada <strong>–</strong> Definiciones,<br />

clasificación por grupos de calidades,<br />

requisitos y rotulado. INDECOPI. Perú.<br />

QUISPE E. et al., 2007: Algunos aspectos de la<br />

fibra y peso vivo de alpacas Huacaya de color<br />

blanco en la region de Huancavelica., APPA<br />

<strong>–</strong> ALPA <strong>–</strong> Cusco, Perú.<br />

SPSS <strong>–</strong> Statistical Product and Service Solutions:<br />

Base version 12.0 for Windows, inc. USA, 2004.<br />

VELARDE C.U., GUERRERO J., 1999: Improving<br />

quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> Alpaca fiber; using<br />

a simulation model for breeding strategies.<br />

SAAD III, Lima, Perú, Nov. 7<strong>–</strong>10.


78 A. Morales Villavicencio, R. Niżnikowski, P. Pietrzykowski<br />

WULIJ et al., 2000: Production performance,<br />

repeatability and heritability estimates for live<br />

weight, fleece weight and fiber characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Alpacas in New Zealand. Small Ruminant<br />

Research 37, 189<strong>–</strong>201.<br />

Streszczenie: Określenie udziału welonu w okrywie<br />

włosowej alpak rasy Huacaya. Badaniami objęto<br />

grupę 25 alpak rasy Huacaya importowanych<br />

z Chile i pochodzących z różnych stad, których<br />

strzyżę przeprowadzono w 2009 roku. Zważono<br />

runo z podziałem na kategorie według partii ciała,<br />

z której pochodzi. Średnią masę runa oszacowano<br />

na 1,78 kg, z czego 0,650 kg stanowił welon.<br />

Zbadano wpływ płci, wieku, koloru na masę welonu<br />

i jego procentowy udział w porównaniu do<br />

pozostałych partii okrywy, oraz dwuczynnikową<br />

interakcję wiek × kolor, ale nie wykazano istotnych<br />

statystycznie różnic. W badanej populacji<br />

samce miały cięższe runo o 2,2 kg i welon 0,75 od<br />

samic, który wynosił odpowiednio 1,55 i 0,455,<br />

a jego procentowy udział określono odpowiednio<br />

na 34,45 u samców i 31,75 u samic. W przypadku<br />

wieku najcięższy welon miały alpaki ośmioletnie<br />

i trzyletnie, i jego procentowy udział wynosił<br />

odpowiednio 38,05 i 37,26. Najcięższe runo<br />

pochodziło od alpak w kolorze białym i ważyło<br />

średnio 2,21 kg, a udział welonu u nich określono<br />

na 36,23%.<br />

MS. received August 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: anna_morales_villavicencio@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 79<strong>–</strong>86<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Fat fraction components’ content in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red cows<br />

TERESA NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA, PIOTR STACHELSKI, HENRYK GRODZKI,<br />

BEATA KUCZYŃSKA<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Fat fraction components’ content in<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red cows. The observations were<br />

carried out on 12 Polish Red breed (pc) cows on<br />

farm in Szczyrzyc. In this experiment the components<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk fat fraction including fatty acid<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile and the content <strong>of</strong> vitamins were characterized.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> these components depends<br />

on feeding season. During the period <strong>of</strong> feeding<br />

the cows on pastures, their milk contained significantly<br />

higher amount <strong>of</strong> such nutritional elements<br />

as: BA, TVA, LA, CLA, PUFA, n-6 and n-3 as well<br />

as vitamin A, and β-carotene than the milk <strong>of</strong> cows<br />

fed with PMR system. It should be emphasized<br />

that that the CLA level in milk <strong>of</strong> a pasture-fed<br />

cows is very high <strong>–</strong> two times higher than that<br />

observed in PMR feeding system.<br />

Key words: fatty acids, CLA, pc cows.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Polish Red cattle (pc) has been the<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> many studies, from which it<br />

is followed that the mentioned species is<br />

a specific reservoir <strong>of</strong> genes which they<br />

have been eliminated in other breeds as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> selection oriented to increase <strong>of</strong><br />

milk performance (Żurkowski, Duniec,<br />

2005). Lower yield is compensated by<br />

better milk composition which is characterized<br />

by higher dry matter content,<br />

especially <strong>of</strong> fat, protein and casein<br />

(Szarek et al., 1996).<br />

Milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red (pc) cows has also<br />

very good technological properties (such<br />

as e.g. higher yield <strong>of</strong> casein curd and its<br />

better quality) which are especially valuable<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> cheese production (Szarek<br />

et al., 1996; Barłowska, 2007). The content<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk fat fraction components has<br />

been the subject <strong>of</strong> many studies but they<br />

concerned mainly the effect <strong>of</strong> nutrition<br />

and Holstein-Friesian (hf) breed. From<br />

the comparison <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> milk <strong>of</strong><br />

hf, Black-and-White, Montbeliarde and<br />

Normande breed (Lawless et al., 1999),<br />

it results that the highest CLA concentration,<br />

as being most frequently analysed<br />

in the studies, was found in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

Montbeliarde breed (1.99 g/100 g FA).<br />

On the other hand, there are rather scarce<br />

studies concerning the content <strong>of</strong> health-<br />

-promoting components in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

pc cows. The studies in this respect were<br />

conducted by Reklewska et al., 2005.<br />

From the above mentioned studies, it is<br />

followed that the milk <strong>of</strong> pc cows has<br />

a higher concentration <strong>of</strong> functional fatty<br />

acids as compared to the milk <strong>of</strong> Black-<br />

-and-White cows; it concerned BA, LA,<br />

LNA, AA, EPA and DHA.<br />

Barłowska (2007) analysed nutritive<br />

value and technological suitability <strong>of</strong><br />

the milk from 7 cattle breeds, managed<br />

in Poland and she found that the milk<br />

<strong>of</strong> pc cows was characterized by a very<br />

good chemical composition. The higher


80 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka et al.<br />

PUFA content (3.73%) was found in the<br />

spring-summer seasons as compared to<br />

the autumn-winter period.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the submitted studies was<br />

to analyze the suitability <strong>of</strong> health-promoting<br />

components in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red<br />

cows with consideration <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

feeding season.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The studies were conducted in the Cistercian<br />

Order farm in Szczyrzyc where<br />

pc cows were kept in pasture <strong>–</strong> indoor<br />

system <strong>of</strong> management: in summer <strong>–</strong> on<br />

the pasture and in winter <strong>–</strong> fed by PMR<br />

system. Feeding ration in the summer<br />

season <strong>–</strong> apart from pasture grazing) consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1<strong>–</strong>2 kg <strong>of</strong> concentrates (wheat<br />

40%; barley 40%; oats 20%) and hay.<br />

During winter feeding period, the ration<br />

included 15 kg <strong>of</strong> maize silage, 15 kg <strong>of</strong><br />

haylage from grasses, 3 kg <strong>of</strong> hay, 2 kg<br />

<strong>of</strong> straw and ca 2 kg <strong>of</strong> concentrates.<br />

In June and December 2006, the milk<br />

samples from 12 at random selected<br />

cows being found in the peak lactation<br />

period, were collected. In the collected<br />

samples, the analysis <strong>of</strong> fatty acid pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> vitamin A, E and<br />

β-carotene was carried out in the laboratory<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong><br />

(<strong>SGGW</strong>) in <strong>Warsaw</strong>.<br />

The qualitative and quantitative analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> fatty acid composition was performed<br />

by a gas chromatography, using gas<br />

chromatograph <strong>of</strong> Hewlett-Packard company.<br />

The capillary column had the following<br />

parameters: length 60 m, internal<br />

diameter 0.25 mm, thickness <strong>of</strong> film <strong>of</strong><br />

liquid phase 0.25 mm, stationary phase<br />

DB-23.<br />

The obtained data were statistically<br />

developed, using a single factor variance<br />

analysis, with the STATGRAPHICS Plus<br />

for Windows 4.1.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Season <strong>of</strong> feeding had a highly significant<br />

effect on milk yield and percentage<br />

content <strong>of</strong> fat and protein in the milk<br />

(Tab. 1). Higher daily milk yield was<br />

found for the cows the nutrition <strong>of</strong> which<br />

was based upon the pasture, as compared<br />

to the winter PMR feeding system. In the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed the PMR system,<br />

higher content <strong>of</strong> fat and protein was<br />

recorded as compared to the milk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows from the summer feeding period.<br />

Irrespectively <strong>of</strong> the feeding season,<br />

the conducted studies indicate the high<br />

content <strong>of</strong> fat and protein in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

pc cows. It was confirmed by the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studies performed by Reklewska<br />

et al. (2005): 4.34% <strong>of</strong> fat and 3.43% <strong>of</strong><br />

protein in the milk <strong>of</strong> the examined pc<br />

cows, and by Barłowska (2007): 4.35%<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat and 3.42% <strong>of</strong> protein, respectively.<br />

The data submitted in Table 2 showed<br />

that the milk <strong>of</strong> cows, grazed on the pastures<br />

contained statistically significantly<br />

more following components: BA, TVA,<br />

CLA as compared to the milk obtained<br />

during winter feeding by PMR system.<br />

In the milk <strong>of</strong> the pasture-grazed cows,<br />

the content <strong>of</strong> BA was by 0.514 g (per<br />

100 g <strong>of</strong> fat) higher than in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

the cows fed PMR system in winter. The<br />

obtained results do not confirm the results<br />

obtained in the studies <strong>of</strong> Jensen (2002),<br />

Schroeder et al. (2003) and Nałęcz-Tarwacka,<br />

Grodzki (2005). The mentioned<br />

authors obtained higher BA levels in the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed the preserved feeds.


Fat fraction components’ content in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red cows 81<br />

TABLE 1. Milk performance <strong>of</strong> cows (average per day) in dependence <strong>of</strong> feeding system<br />

Milk [kg]<br />

Fat [%]<br />

Protein [%]<br />

Urea [mg/l]<br />

Feeding system<br />

General<br />

summer feeding winter feeding<br />

average<br />

(traditional)<br />

(PMR)<br />

n 18 15 33<br />

LSM 10.96 A 9.59 A 10.34<br />

SE 0.30 0.33<br />

n 18 15 33<br />

LSM 4.50 A 4.77 A 4.62<br />

SE 0.06 0.06<br />

n 18 15 33<br />

LSM 3.24 A 3.44 A 3.33<br />

SE 0.04 0.05<br />

n 18 15 33<br />

LSM 179.37 143.10 162.88<br />

SE 16.57 18.15<br />

Values in the same row marked by the same letters differ significantly: capital letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01, small<br />

letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05.<br />

TABLE 2. Functional fatty acids content in cow milk in dependence <strong>of</strong> feeding season (g/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat)<br />

Acid name<br />

n<br />

General<br />

average<br />

Summer feeding<br />

(traditional)<br />

Winter feeding<br />

(PMR)<br />

C4:0 (BA) 12 LMS 2.674 2.931 a 2.417 a<br />

SE 0.138 0.138<br />

C18:1 trans 11 (TVA) 12 LMS 2.980 3.830 A 2.129 A<br />

SE 0.223 0.223<br />

C18:2 (LA) 12 LMS 1.903 2.256 A 1.551 A<br />

SE 0.104 0.104<br />

C18:2 c9t11 (CLA) 12 LMS 0.987 1.283 A 0.690 A<br />

SE 0.078 0.078<br />

C20:4 (AA) 12 LMS 0.120 0.126 0.114<br />

SE 0.005 0.005<br />

C20:5 (EPA) 12 LMS 0.082 0.081 0.082<br />

SE 0.009 0.009<br />

C22:5 (DPA) 12 LMS 0.123 0.133 0.113<br />

SE 0.009 0.009<br />

C22:6 (DHA) 12 LMS 0.021 0.015 A 0.028 A<br />

SE 0.002 0.002<br />

Values in the same row marked by the same letters differ significantly: capital letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01, small<br />

letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05.


82 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka et al.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> conformity between the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studies concerning the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

type <strong>of</strong> feed (fresh or preserved) on BA<br />

content indicates the purposefulness <strong>of</strong><br />

the studies aimed in this direction as BA<br />

plays the important role in preventing<br />

and treatment <strong>of</strong> colon cancers (Hague et<br />

al., 1996; Parodi, 1997; Przybojewska,<br />

Rafalski, 2003). Values <strong>of</strong> BA in the milk<br />

<strong>of</strong> pc cows as obtained in the studies <strong>of</strong><br />

Reklewska et al. (2005) exceeded the<br />

results obtained in the present studies.<br />

In the milk <strong>of</strong> pasture grazed cows,<br />

CLA content was almost twice higher<br />

than in the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed by<br />

PMR system. TVA content in the milk<br />

<strong>of</strong> grazed cows was also higher than in<br />

winter nutrition. Similar results in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> the increased CLA and TVA content in<br />

the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed the green forage<br />

were obtained in the studies <strong>of</strong> many<br />

authors: Jahreis et al. (1997), Kelly et al.<br />

(1998), Dihman et al. (1999), Chilliard et<br />

al. (2001) and Nałęcz-Tarwacka (2006).<br />

The milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed on the pasture<br />

in the summer contained considerably<br />

more LA (by 0.71 LA/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat) than<br />

the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed by PMR system<br />

in winter. The obtained results have not<br />

been confirmed the studies <strong>of</strong> Jahreis et<br />

al. (1997), Kelly et al. (1998), Dihman<br />

et al. (1999), Elgermsa et al. (2004)<br />

and Nałęcz-Tarwacka (2006) where the<br />

higher LA content was obtained in the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> TMR fed cows compared to pasture<br />

graced cows.<br />

From among the analysed fatty acids,<br />

only DHA had the higher content in<br />

the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows during the winter<br />

feeding period (0.028 g/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat) in<br />

comparison to the summer nutrition<br />

period (0.015 g/100g <strong>of</strong> fat). Similar<br />

results were obtained by Reklewska et al.<br />

(2003) when comparing DHA content in<br />

the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed by TMR in winter<br />

(0.017 g DHA/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat) and grazed on<br />

the pasture in summer (0.016 g/100 <strong>of</strong><br />

fat). In the studies <strong>of</strong> Nałęcz-Tarwacka<br />

(2006), the highest DHA level was found<br />

in the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed the feeding<br />

ration consisting <strong>of</strong> green forage supplemented<br />

with wilted grass silage. A small<br />

number <strong>of</strong> papers, where the content <strong>of</strong><br />

polyunsaturated fatty acids with the chain<br />

length above 20 carbon atoms was determined,<br />

results, inter alia, from the fact<br />

they constitute a small part <strong>of</strong> milk fat and<br />

their level has been until recently almost<br />

near detection threshold and therefore, in<br />

many till-now existing studies have not<br />

discussed it.<br />

Table 3 shows the content <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> fatty acids in cow milk, depending<br />

on the employed feeding system.<br />

Significant differences were recorded<br />

in SFA content in the milk <strong>of</strong> the pasture<br />

grazed cows in summer and fed PMR<br />

system in winter. It was found that the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed on the pasture in the<br />

summer time contained by 2.856 g SFA<br />

/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat less than the milk from the<br />

cows fed by PMR system in winter. It was<br />

confirmed by the results <strong>of</strong> the studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> many authors: Dhiman et al. (1999),<br />

Kuczyńska et al. (1999), Elgersma et<br />

al. (2003), Nałęcz-Tarwacka (2006) and<br />

Barłowska (2007). The obtained lower<br />

SFA levels in the milk <strong>of</strong> the cows from<br />

the summer feeding period are significant<br />

from the consumer health point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

The conducted studies revealed highly<br />

significant differences in the content <strong>of</strong><br />

PUFA, acids from n-6/n-3 family in the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows, depending on the feeding<br />

season and the related feeding ration. It<br />

was confirmed by the results <strong>of</strong> the studies


Fat fraction components’ content in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red cows 83<br />

TABLE 3. Content <strong>of</strong> chosen fatty acid groups in cow milk in dependence <strong>of</strong> feeding season (g/100 g<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat)<br />

Acid group name<br />

n<br />

General Summer feeding Winter feeding<br />

average (traditional) (PMR)<br />

SFA 12 LMS 61.16 59.988 a 62.844 a<br />

SE 0.902 0.902<br />

PUFA 12 LMS 4.486 5,433 A 3.539 A<br />

SE 0.219 0.219<br />

N <strong>–</strong> 6 12 LMS 1.988 2.342 A 1.634 A<br />

SE 0.104 0.104<br />

N <strong>–</strong> 3 12 LMS 1.241 1.543 A 0.939 A<br />

SE 0.068 0.068<br />

N <strong>–</strong> 6 / N <strong>–</strong> 3 12 LMS 1.639 1.545 1.733<br />

SE 0.075 0.075<br />

Values in the same row marked by the same letters differ significantly: capital letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01, small<br />

letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05.<br />

TABLE 4. Content <strong>of</strong> saturated fatty acids (negatively influencing human health) in cow milk in dependence<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeding season (g/100 g <strong>of</strong> fat)<br />

Acid name<br />

n<br />

General Summer feeding Winter feeding<br />

average (traditional) (PMR)<br />

C12:0 12 LMS 2.179 2.163 2.196<br />

SE 0.127 0.127<br />

C14:0 12 LMS 9.060 9.065 9.056<br />

SE 0.333 0.333<br />

C16:0 12 LMS 29.654 28.225 a 31.083 a<br />

SE 0.926 0.926<br />

Values in the same row marked by the same letters differ significantly <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05.<br />

<strong>of</strong> many authors: Kuczyńska et al. (1999),<br />

Elgersma et al. (2003), Nałęcz-Tarwacka<br />

(2006) and Barłowska (2007).<br />

In Table 4, the content <strong>of</strong> saturated<br />

fatty acids (having unfavourable effect<br />

on human health) in the milk <strong>of</strong> cows<br />

depending on the employed feeding<br />

system, was presented.<br />

As far as fatty acids, negatively affecting<br />

human health is concerned, significant<br />

differences were obtained in the<br />

content <strong>of</strong> C12:0 and C14:0 in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Red cows, fed on the pasture in the<br />

summer and by PMR system in winter. In<br />

the studies <strong>of</strong> Nałęcz-Tarwacka (2006)<br />

when comparing the quality <strong>of</strong> milk fat<br />

coming from the summer and winter<br />

period, different tendencies were recoded<br />

<strong>–</strong> higher C12:0 content was found in the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed with green forage<br />

and <strong>of</strong> C14:0 was higher in the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

the cows fed the preserved feeds.<br />

In the conducted studies, lower, i.e.<br />

more favourable level <strong>of</strong> C16:0 was<br />

found in the milk <strong>of</strong> the pasture grazed<br />

cows as compared to the animals fed by<br />

PMR system. It was confirmed by the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the studies <strong>of</strong> many authors:


84 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka et al.<br />

TABLE 5. Vitamins A and E as well as β-carotene in cow milk in dependence <strong>of</strong> feeding season<br />

(mg / l)<br />

General Summer feeding Winter feeding<br />

Component name<br />

n<br />

average (traditional) (PMR)<br />

12 LMS 0.458 0.494 a 0.423 a<br />

Vitamin A<br />

SE 0.024 0.024<br />

12 LMS 1.228 1.341 1.114<br />

Vitamin E<br />

SE 0.115 0.115<br />

12 LMS 0.256 0.314 A 0.197 A<br />

β <strong>–</strong> carotene<br />

SE 0.027 0.027<br />

Values in the same row marked by the same letters differ significantly: capital letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01, small<br />

letters <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05.<br />

Kelly et al. (1998), Schroeder et al.<br />

(2003) and White et al. (2001), Loor et<br />

al. (2003) and Nałęcz-Tarwacka (2006).<br />

The data submitted in Table 5 indicate<br />

the higher level <strong>of</strong> vitamins A and E<br />

and <strong>of</strong> β-carotene in the milk <strong>of</strong> the pasture<br />

grazed cows in the summer than <strong>of</strong><br />

the cows fed by PMR system in winter.<br />

Higher concentration <strong>of</strong> vitamin A and<br />

β-carotene in the milk <strong>of</strong> the pasture grazed<br />

cows in the summer results from higher<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> carotenoids in the rations, containing<br />

green forage in relation to the feds<br />

from winter feeding. It was confirmed by<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> the studies <strong>of</strong> many authors:<br />

Jensen et al. (1999), Kuczyńska (2001),<br />

Reklewska et al. (2003) and Nałecz-Tarwacka<br />

(2006).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Summing up, it should be stated as follows:<br />

• In the milk <strong>of</strong> pasture grazed Polish<br />

Red cows, almost twice higher content<br />

<strong>of</strong> CLA was found as compared to the<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> the cows fed by PMR system.<br />

• The studies revealed also the favourable<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> pasture feeding on the<br />

content <strong>of</strong> the following components<br />

in the milk: BA, TVA, LA, PUFA,<br />

n-6 and n-3, vitamins A and β-carotene<br />

(increase <strong>of</strong> the content), C16:0<br />

and SFA (decrease <strong>of</strong> concentration)<br />

as compared to the level <strong>of</strong> the mentioned<br />

components in the milk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows fed by PMR system in winter.<br />

• During winter feeding, higher DHA<br />

level was found in the milk in comparison<br />

to the summer feeding period.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BARŁOWSKA J.B., 2007: Wartość odżywcza<br />

i przydatność technologiczna mleka krów 7 ras<br />

użytkowanych w Polsce. Rozprawy Naukowe<br />

AR Lublin, z. 321.<br />

CHILLIARD Y., FERLAY A., DOREAU M.,<br />

2001: Effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> forages, animal<br />

fat or marine oils in cow’s diet on milk fat<br />

secretion and composition, especially conjugated<br />

linoleic acid (CLA) and polyunsaturated<br />

fatty acids. Livest. Prod. Sci., 70, 31<strong>–</strong>48.<br />

DHIMAN T.R., ANAND G.R., SATTER L.D.,<br />

PARIZA M.W., 1999: Conjugated linoleic acid<br />

content <strong>of</strong> milk cows fed different diets. J.<br />

Dairy Sci., 82, 10, 2146<strong>–</strong>2156.<br />

ELGERSMA A., ELLEN G., VAN DER HORST<br />

H., BOER H., DEKKER P.R., TAMMINGA<br />

S., 2004a: Quick changes in milk fat composition<br />

from cows after transition from fresh grass<br />

to a silage diet. <strong>Animal</strong> Feed Sci. Technol., 117,<br />

13<strong>–</strong>27.


Fat fraction components’ content in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish Red cows 85<br />

HAGUE A., BUTT A.J., PARASKEVA C., 1996:<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> butyrate in human colonic epithelial<br />

cells: an energy source or inducer <strong>of</strong> differentiation<br />

and apoptosis. Proc. <strong>of</strong> the Nutrition<br />

Society, 55, 937<strong>–</strong>943.<br />

JAHREIS G., FRITSCHE J., STEINHART H.,<br />

1997: Conjugated linoleic acid in milk fat: high<br />

variation depending on production system.<br />

Nutr. Res., 17, 9, 1479<strong>–</strong>1484.<br />

JENSEN R.G., 2002: The composition <strong>of</strong> bovine<br />

milk lipids: january 1995 to december 2000.<br />

J. Dairy Sci., 85, 2, 295<strong>–</strong>350.<br />

JENSEN S.K., JOHANNSEN A.K.B., HER-<br />

MANSEN J.E., 1999: Quantitative secretion<br />

and maximal secretion capacity <strong>of</strong> retinol,<br />

β-carotene and α-tocopherol into cows’ milk.<br />

J. Dairy Res., 66: 511<strong>–</strong>522.<br />

KELLY M.L., KOLVER E.S., BAUMAN D.E.,<br />

AMBUGH M.E., MULLER L.D., 1998: Effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> intake <strong>of</strong> pasture on concentrations <strong>of</strong> conjugated<br />

linoleic acid in milk <strong>of</strong> lactating cows. J.<br />

Dairy Sci., 81, 6, 1630<strong>–</strong>1636.<br />

KUCZYŃSKA B., REKLEWSKA B., KARA-<br />

SZEWSKA A., 1999: Pr<strong>of</strong>il kwasów tłuszczowych<br />

w mleku wymieniowym i zbiorczym krów<br />

czarno-białych z kilku rejonów Polski. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. Przeglądu Hodowlanego, 44, 143<strong>–</strong>150.<br />

KUCZYŃSKA B., 2001: Badanie czynników<br />

warunkujących zmiany jakości tłuszczu mleka<br />

krowiego i koziego. Praca doktorska <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Warszawa.<br />

LAWLESS F., STANTON C., ESCOP P., DE-<br />

VERY R., DILLON P., MURPHY J.J., 1999:<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> breed on bovine milk cis-9, trans -<br />

11- conjugated linoleic acid content. Liv. Prod.<br />

Sci, 62, 43<strong>–</strong>49.<br />

LOOR J.J., SORIANO F.D., LIN X., HERBEIN<br />

J.H., POLAN C.E., 2003: Grazing allowance<br />

after the morning or afternoon milking for lactating<br />

cows fed a total mixed ration (TMR) enhances<br />

trans 11<strong>–</strong>18:1 and cis 9, trans 11<strong>–</strong>18:2<br />

(rumenic acid) in milk fat to different extents.<br />

Anim. Feed Sci. Technology, 103, 105<strong>–</strong>119.<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., GRODZKI H., 2005:<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> early spring feeding on fatty acid<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> cow’s milk. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci.,<br />

14/55, 1, 67<strong>–</strong>70.<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., 2006: Wpływ wybranych<br />

czynników na zawartość funkcjonalnych<br />

składników tłuszczu mleka krów. Rozprawy<br />

Naukowe i Monografie. Wydawnictwo <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

w Warszawie.<br />

PARODI P.W., 1997: Cow’s milk fat components<br />

as potential anticarcinogenic agents. J. Nutr.,<br />

127, 1055<strong>–</strong>1060.<br />

PRZYBOJEWSKA B., RAFALSKI H., 2003:<br />

Kwasy tłuszczowe występujące w mleku a zdrowie<br />

człowieka. Krótkołańcuchowe nasycone<br />

kwasy tłuszczowe SCFA (cz. 1). Przegląd Mleczarski,<br />

4, 148<strong>–</strong>151.<br />

REKLEWSKA B., BERNATOWICZ E.,<br />

REKLEWSKI Z., NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T.,<br />

KUCZYŃSKA B., ZDZIARSKI K., OPRZĄ-<br />

DEK A., 2003: Zawartość biologicznie aktywnych<br />

składników w mleku krów zależnie od<br />

systemu żywienia i sezonu. Zesz. Nauk. Przeglądu<br />

Hodowlanego, 68, 1, 85<strong>–</strong>98.<br />

REKLEWSKA B., BERNATOWICZ E.,<br />

REKLEWSKI Z., KUCZYŃSKA B., ZDZI-<br />

ARSKI K., SAKOWSKI T., SŁONIEWSKI<br />

K., 2005: Functional components <strong>of</strong> milk produced<br />

by polish black and white, polish red<br />

and simental cows. Electronic J. Polish Agric.<br />

Univ. 8, 3.<br />

SCHROEDER G.F., DELAHOY J.E., VIDAUR-<br />

RETA I., BARGO F., GALIOSTRO G.A.,<br />

MULLER L.D., 2003: Milk fatty acid composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> cows fed a total mixed ration or pasture<br />

plus concentrates replacing corn with fat.<br />

J. Dairy Sci., 86, 10, 3237<strong>–</strong>3248.<br />

SZAREK J., FELEŃCZAK A, CZAJA H., 1996:<br />

Stan hodowli bydła czerwonego (PC) i jej perspektywy.<br />

Sympozjum Naukowe w Olsztynie:<br />

Hodowla bydła w Polsce historia i przeszłość.<br />

WHITE S.L., BERTRAND J.A., WADE M.R,<br />

WASHBURN S.P., GREEN J.T., JENKINS<br />

T.C., 2001: Comparison <strong>of</strong> fatty acid content<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk from Jersey and Holstein cows consuming<br />

pasture or a total mixed ration. J. Dairy<br />

Sci., 84, 10, 2295<strong>–</strong>2301.<br />

ŻURKOWSKI M., DUNIEC M., 2005: Struktura<br />

genetyczna bydła polskiego czerwonego na<br />

podstawie badań grup krwi oraz sekwencji mikrosatelitarnych<br />

niekodujących i kodujących<br />

DNA. Wiadomości Zootechniczne, R. XLIII,<br />

2: 44<strong>–</strong>54.<br />

Streszczenie: Pr<strong>of</strong>i l kwasów tłuszczowych w mleku<br />

krów rasy polskiej czerwonej. Badania przeprowadzono<br />

na krowach rasy polskiej czerwonej<br />

w oborze O.O. Cystersów w Szczyrzycu. Analizowano<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>il kwasów tłuszczowych i zawartość witamin<br />

w mleku. Ich zawartość zależała od sezonu


86 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka et al.<br />

żywienia. Mleko krów z okresu żywienia letniego<br />

opartego na pastwisku zawierało więcej następujących<br />

składników: BA, TVA, LA, CLA, PUFA,<br />

n-6 i n-3, jak również witaminy A i β-karotenów<br />

niż mleko krów żywionych systemem PMR. Należy<br />

podkreślić, że w mleku krów żywionych na<br />

pastwisku poziom CLA był dwa razy większy niż<br />

u krów żywionych systemem PMR.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Author’s address:<br />

Teresa Nałęcz-Tarwacka<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 87<strong>–</strong>92<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Multiple pregnancies in cattle and the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> their occurrence<br />

TERESA NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA, KATARZYNA PALIŃSKA,<br />

HENRYK GRODZKI<br />

Departament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong>, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Multiple pregnancies in cattle and the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> their occurrence. The aim <strong>of</strong> the studies<br />

was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> the sequence <strong>of</strong><br />

lactation and season <strong>of</strong> calving on occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple births. The studies included 6755 cows<br />

which had at least one multiple pregnancy during<br />

6 years. The percentage <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

was increasing from year to year but it did not exceed<br />

2% <strong>of</strong> all parturitions. It was found that<br />

the greatest number <strong>of</strong> multiple births occurred<br />

in cows in the second (26.63%) and the third<br />

(21.01%) lactation. A significant influence is exerted<br />

by season <strong>of</strong> calving; the greatest number<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple births occurs in winter-spring season,<br />

that is, in months: December<strong>–</strong>May (53% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

multiple births); it comes from spring-summer<br />

fertilization (effective insemination) <strong>of</strong> the cows<br />

(March<strong>–</strong>August).<br />

Key words: cows, multiple pregnancy.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Natural multiple pregnancies in cattle,<br />

as typical one-fetus animals, occur sporadically.<br />

They result, first <strong>of</strong> all, from<br />

double ovulation, relatively seldom from<br />

the self-division <strong>of</strong> the fertilized cell<br />

Max (2000). Multi-fetus pregnancies in<br />

cattle constitute a small percentage <strong>of</strong> all<br />

parturitions. It results from the studies <strong>of</strong><br />

Litwińczuk et al. (1987) that it is equal<br />

to 1.25<strong>–</strong>1.48%, depending on the region<br />

<strong>of</strong> Poland. Higher frequencies <strong>of</strong> occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies were found<br />

by Kuźma R., Kuźma K. (1994), that is<br />

1.4<strong>–</strong>3.1% and by Max (2004): 1<strong>–</strong>4% <strong>of</strong><br />

all deliveries. The highest percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

twin pregnancies <strong>–</strong> 3.57% was obtained<br />

by Sawa (1994) in her studies. With the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> nutrition, the increase <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies was<br />

proved; even up to 10<strong>–</strong>15%. According to<br />

Sawa (1994) the natural factors, affecting<br />

the increased number <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

include, inter alias, effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successive reproduction cycle, effect <strong>of</strong><br />

season (period) <strong>of</strong> fertilizing. Numerous<br />

studies prove that the highest percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies occurs with the<br />

third calving and the lowest one <strong>–</strong> in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the first birth. In the studies <strong>of</strong><br />

Litwińczuk et al. (1987) it was found that<br />

the multi-fetus pregnancies occur relatively<br />

rarely in primiparous cows (0.02%<br />

<strong>of</strong> all multiple births) and in older cows<br />

<strong>–</strong> after the sixth, or later fertilization. The<br />

highest percentage, i.e. as much as 20.7%<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple births was recorded in the<br />

cows at the third calving, whereas in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second, fourth and fifth delivery<br />

<strong>–</strong> their frequency was found in the range<br />

<strong>of</strong> 15.3<strong>–</strong>17.3%. In the studies <strong>of</strong> Kuźma<br />

R., Kuźma K. (1994) a similar tendency


88 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

is indicated: the lowest number is at the<br />

first calving (1.0% from all parturitions)<br />

and the highest one <strong>–</strong> at the third (3.2%)<br />

and the seventh parturition (3.4%). On<br />

the other hand, Sawa (1994) showed that<br />

the highest frequency <strong>of</strong> multiple births<br />

occurred at the second and fourth calving<br />

(30% <strong>of</strong> all multiple parturitions),<br />

somewhat lower <strong>–</strong> at the third one (26%)<br />

and the lowest frequency was recorded,<br />

similarly as by other authors, at the first<br />

delivery (6.5%).<br />

As it was given by Litwińczuk et al.<br />

(1987), more than 62% <strong>of</strong> all multiple<br />

pregnancies occurred in winter <strong>–</strong> spring<br />

period, i.e. since December until May,<br />

thus from the effective fertilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows in March<strong>–</strong>August. Similar results<br />

were reported by Sawa (1994) who<br />

obtained almost 65% <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

in the mentioned period.<br />

In literature, there is a lack <strong>of</strong> data<br />

concerning the current state <strong>of</strong> occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in cattle.<br />

Due to the fact that the productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> our cow population, resulting from<br />

crossbreeding with HF as well as from<br />

nutrition improvement has been considerably<br />

increased during the recent years,<br />

the authors undertook the task <strong>of</strong> presenting<br />

the current situation <strong>of</strong> the discussed<br />

problem.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the work was to show<br />

the problems <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in<br />

cattle during the recent six years and <strong>of</strong><br />

the factors, affecting their occurrence.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Material for the studies was constituted by<br />

the data from breeding documentation <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Federation <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeders and<br />

Milk Producers. The collected information<br />

covered the period from 1.01.2002<br />

to 31.12.2007 and they concerned the<br />

farms, situated in the Mazovian voivodeship.<br />

The analysis included 6755 cows which<br />

had at least one multiple calving. Thus,<br />

7112 calved were obtained. The collected<br />

data concerned frequency <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

births in the particular years, month <strong>of</strong><br />

a year and in the successive lactations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cows. The data concerning all<br />

parturitions <strong>of</strong> the cows covered with<br />

milk recording system in the Mazovian<br />

voivodeship were collected from publications<br />

<strong>of</strong> the National Centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong><br />

Breeding [1, 2, 3, 4] and Polish Federation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeders and Milk Producers<br />

[11, 12].<br />

The obtained data were estimated<br />

according the frequency <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies,<br />

depending on the year <strong>of</strong> observation,<br />

calendar month and the successive<br />

lactation, with the application <strong>of</strong> basic statistics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Program SPSS Statistics 17.0.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Occurrence <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

In population <strong>of</strong> dairy cows, being<br />

covered with cattle utility evaluation by<br />

Polish Federation <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeders and<br />

Milk Producers in Mazovian voivodeship<br />

in the 2002<strong>–</strong>2007, a gradual increase <strong>of</strong><br />

the number <strong>of</strong> multiple births has been<br />

recorded (Fig. 1). The highest increase<br />

had place in 2004 and it was equal to<br />

32%. The increase <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple parturitions results probably<br />

from the increase <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> cows<br />

under the evaluation <strong>of</strong> PFCMMP. Also,<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> phytoestrogens in feed,<br />

commonly occurring in certain species<br />

<strong>of</strong> clover, alfalfa or soy is considered as


Multiple pregnancies in cattle... 89<br />

alving number<br />

1700<br />

1500<br />

1300<br />

1100<br />

900<br />

700<br />

760<br />

874<br />

1140<br />

1338<br />

1476<br />

1524<br />

500<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Year<br />

FIGURE 1. Multiple pregnancies in 2002<strong>–</strong>2007<br />

TABLE 1. The percentage <strong>of</strong> multiple calvings in Mazovian voivodeship in 2002<strong>–</strong>2007<br />

alving number<br />

Lear<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Total<br />

Total 56 341 60 389 63 118 88 369 75 467 78 626 422 310<br />

Multiple 760 874 1 140 1 338 1 476 1 524 7 112<br />

ercentage 1.35 1.45 1.81 1.51 1.96 1.94 1.68<br />

a potential source <strong>of</strong> natural estrogens<br />

<strong>–</strong> Kraszewska et al. (2007).<br />

In the 2002<strong>–</strong>2007, 422 310 parturitions<br />

were recorded in total, including 7112<br />

multiple births (Tab. 1). The frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

was different in the particular years and<br />

varied within the limits <strong>of</strong> 1.35<strong>–</strong>1.96%.<br />

The obtained results are similar as observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> other authors who report their<br />

intervals as 1.25<strong>–</strong>1.48% (Litwińczuk<br />

et al., 1987) and 1.4<strong>–</strong>3.1% (Kuźma R.,<br />

Kuźma K., 1994).<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

calvings is given in Table 2. From<br />

6755 cows, more than 90% were the<br />

cows with one multiple calving. Besides<br />

it, there were registered 306 cows with<br />

two multiple births, 24 cows with three<br />

multiple parturitions and one cow with<br />

four multiple calvings.<br />

TABLE 2. Frequency <strong>of</strong> multiple calvingsoccurrence<br />

umber <strong>of</strong> multiple ows<br />

calvings<br />

(heads)<br />

%<br />

ne 6 424 90.326<br />

Two 306 4.303<br />

Three 24 0.337<br />

Four 1 0.014<br />

Total cows 6 755 94.98<br />

alvings in total 7 112 100<br />

Factors, affecting the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> successive calving<br />

Age is one <strong>of</strong> the analyzed factors, affecting<br />

the increase <strong>of</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in<br />

cows. The distribution shown in Table<br />

2 illustrates that multiple births in cows<br />

occur most frequently at the second


90 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

15.07<br />

26.63<br />

21.01<br />

15.72<br />

10.33<br />

FIGURE 2. Multiple pregnancies in subsequent calvings <strong>of</strong> analyzed cows (%)<br />

5.61<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Calving<br />

3.01<br />

1.39<br />

0.73<br />

0.38<br />

0.07<br />

0.04<br />

calving (26.63%). At the third calving,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies<br />

was equal to 21.1% and at the fourth one<br />

<strong>–</strong> 15.57%, being somewhat lower than at<br />

the first calving <strong>–</strong> 15.07% and then, at<br />

the fifth calving <strong>–</strong> 10.33%. On the other<br />

hand, in later lactations (VII and further)<br />

it was found below 5.61%.<br />

Similar results were obtained by<br />

Kuźma R., Kuźma K. (1994) who reported<br />

that the greatest number <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

births occurred in the second lactation<br />

(25.6%). Sawa (1994) expresses the same<br />

opinion and shows in her studies that the<br />

highest frequency <strong>of</strong> multiple births was<br />

recorded in the second and fourth calving<br />

(30% <strong>of</strong> all multiple deliveries).<br />

The own studies differ from the results,<br />

obtained by Litwińczuk et al. (1987)<br />

who state that the greatest number <strong>of</strong><br />

twins and triples was born in the third<br />

calving (20.7%) and the lowest number<br />

was observed during the first calving<br />

(0.02%); the mentioned studies differ<br />

also from those ones <strong>of</strong> Sawa [13] where<br />

it was recorded that the lowest percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies occurred in<br />

the first calving (6.5%).<br />

Kuźma R., Kuźma K. (1994) explain<br />

that the reason for obtaining such small<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in<br />

primiparous cows lies in incompletely<br />

developed body <strong>of</strong> female. The increased<br />

demand on protein and energy is necessary<br />

for twin fetuses as well as for mother<br />

alone.<br />

Max (2001) states that more seldom<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in<br />

primiparous as compared to multiparous<br />

cows is caused by too small space<br />

inside uterus what is favorable for death<br />

<strong>of</strong> embryos (lower migration <strong>of</strong> embryos<br />

until the 18th day after fertilization).<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> fertilization<br />

When analyzing the effect <strong>of</strong> the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertilization <strong>of</strong> female on the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies, we may observe<br />

that their greatest umber occurs in the<br />

winter-spring period, that is, in the<br />

months: December<strong>–</strong>May (53% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

multiple pregnancies) so, it comes from


Multiple pregnancies in cattle... 91<br />

11%<br />

10%<br />

9%<br />

8%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Month<br />

FIGURE 3. Multiple pregnancies in subsequent months (%)<br />

the spring-summer fertilization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows (March <strong>–</strong> August) (Fig. 3). Similar<br />

results were obtained by Litwińczuk et<br />

al. (1987) and Sawa (1994).<br />

Administration <strong>of</strong> feeds, which contain<br />

phytoestrogens, being commonly<br />

present in certain species <strong>of</strong> clover (Trifolium<br />

repens, Trifolium fragirerum), alfalfa<br />

or soy in spring period, is considered<br />

as a potential source <strong>of</strong> natural estrogens.<br />

Kraszewska et al. (2007) report that phytoestrogens<br />

may disturb activity <strong>of</strong> many<br />

systems <strong>of</strong> the female’s body, including<br />

reproduction system. In the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />

the authors, phytoestrogens reveal structural<br />

similarity to 17-β-estradiol (E2;<br />

female sex hormone) and it may, in turn,<br />

lead to binding <strong>of</strong> the mentioned compounds<br />

with estrogen receptors α and β<br />

(ER α and β). Phytoestrogens act in the<br />

same way as agonists or antagonists <strong>of</strong><br />

the discussed receptors, competing with<br />

estradiol for the place <strong>of</strong> binding.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. KRAJOWE CENTRUM HODOWLI ZWIE-<br />

RZĄT, 2006: Ocena wartości użytkowej krów<br />

oraz ocena i selekcja buhajów. Wyniki oceny za<br />

2005 rok.<br />

2. KRAJOWE CENTRUM HODOWLI ZWIE-<br />

RZĄT, 2005: Ocena wartości użytkowej krów<br />

oraz ocena i selekcja buhajów. Wyniki oceny za<br />

2004 rok.<br />

3. KRAJOWE CENTRUM HODOWLI ZWIE-<br />

RZĄT, 2004: Ocena wartości użytkowej krów<br />

oraz ocena i selekcja buhajów. Wyniki oceny za<br />

2003 rok.<br />

4. KRAJOWE CENTRUM HODOWLI ZWIE-<br />

RZĄT, 2003: Ocena wartości użytkowej krów<br />

oraz ocena i selekcja buhajów. Wyniki oceny za<br />

2002 rok.<br />

5. KRASZEWSKA O., NYNCA A., KAMIŃ-<br />

SKA B., CIERESZKO R., 2007: Fitoestrogeny.<br />

I. Występowanie, metabolizm i znaczenie<br />

biologiczne u samic. Postępy biologii komórki,<br />

tom 34, 1, 189<strong>–</strong>205.<br />

6. KUŹMA R., KUŹMA K., 1994: Występowanie<br />

wycieleń mnogich u krów mlecznych w warunkach<br />

naturalnych i ich wpływ na poród, okres<br />

poporodowy i płodność. Przegląd Hodowlany,<br />

9, 1<strong>–</strong>5.<br />

7. LITWIŃCZUK Z., MAJEWSKA E., MAJEW-<br />

SKI Z., 1987: Wpływ porodów bliźniaczych na<br />

wydajność i płodność krów rasy ncb. Medycyna<br />

Weterynaryjna, 2, 111<strong>–</strong>114.<br />

8. MAX A., 2000: Punkcja pęcherzyków jajnikowych<br />

pod kontrolą USG jako element sterowania<br />

owulacją u bydła. Rozprawy Naukowe<br />

i Monografie, 21<strong>–</strong>25. Wydawnictwo <strong>SGGW</strong>,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

9. MAX A., 2001: Próba uzyskania i wczesnego<br />

rozpoznawania ciąży bliźniaczej jałówek po<br />

indukowanych owulacjach mnogich. Medycyna<br />

Weterynaryjna, 57, 433<strong>–</strong>436.


92 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

10. MAX A., 2004: Problemy kliniczne związane<br />

z ciążą mnogą u krów. Magazyn Weterynaryjny,<br />

89, 5<strong>–</strong>6.<br />

11. POLSKA FEDERACJA HODOWCÓW<br />

BYDŁA I PRODUCENTÓW MLEKA, 2008:<br />

Ocena i hodowla bydła mlecznego. Dane za<br />

rok 2007.<br />

12. POLSKA FEDERACJA HODOWCÓW<br />

BYDŁA I PRODUCENTÓW MLEKA, 2007:<br />

Ocena i hodowla bydła mlecznego. Dane za<br />

rok 2006.<br />

13. SAWA A., 1994: Wpływ ciąży bliźniaczej na<br />

użytkowość krów. Zeszyty Naukowe <strong>–</strong> Zootechnika,<br />

189, 26, 7<strong>–</strong>14.<br />

Streszczenie: Ciąże mnogie u bydła i czynniki<br />

warunkujące ich występowanie. W województwie<br />

mazowieckim w latach 2002<strong>–</strong>2007 zaobserwowano<br />

wzrost liczby wycieleń mnogich u bydła.<br />

Występowanie porodów mnogich w tym okresie<br />

kształtowało się na poziomie 1,35<strong>–</strong>1,96%. Powtarzalność<br />

ciąż mnogich była niska <strong>–</strong> zaledwie<br />

u 331 sztuk (z 6755) zarejestrowano przynajmniej<br />

dwie ciąże mnogie, co może świadczyć o wpływie<br />

czynnika genetycznego. Największa częstotliwość<br />

ciąż mnogich wystąpiła w okresie zimowo-wiosennym,<br />

a więc od grudnia do maja i jest<br />

to 53% ciąż mnogich. Największy odsetek ciąż<br />

wielopłodowych występuje u krów przy drugim<br />

wycieleniu.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Author’s address:<br />

Teresa Nałęcz-Tarwacka<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 93<strong>–</strong>99<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies on cow milk production<br />

and reproduction indices<br />

TERESA NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA, KATARZYNA PALIŃSKA, HENRYK GRODZKI<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies on cow<br />

milk production and reproduction indices. The<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> the studies was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple pregnancies on milk performance and<br />

the reproduction indicators <strong>of</strong> cows. The studies<br />

covered 6755 animals in which at least one multiple<br />

birth occurred during 6 years. The data concerning<br />

cow milk performance during previous,<br />

parallel lactation and that one, occurring directly<br />

after multiple pregnancy and gestation period and<br />

cow reproduction parameters <strong>–</strong> inter-calving and<br />

inter-pregnancy periods during, before and after<br />

multiple pregnancy. It was found that the multiple<br />

pregnancies did not lower milk performance.<br />

After multiple pregnancy, the examined reproduction<br />

indices were abbreviated as compared to their<br />

length before the multiple pregnancy.<br />

Key words: multiple pregnancy, milk performance,<br />

reproduction indices.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Phenomenon <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies in<br />

cattle is very interesting and has been the<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> many studies. In the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />

Litwińczuk et al. (1987), multiple pregnancies<br />

do not lower milk productivity.<br />

The author reports that the cows in multiple<br />

pregnancy gave more milk (4152<br />

kg) than the cows from control group,<br />

delivering always one calf (3846.8 kg).<br />

When analyzing the results, Litwińczuk<br />

et al. (1987) found that the lowest milk<br />

yield was obtained from the cows in lactation<br />

before multiple parturition (4103<br />

kg <strong>of</strong> milk), somewhat higher <strong>–</strong> after<br />

multiple birth (4174.3 kg <strong>of</strong> milk) and the<br />

highest one was obtained in the remaining<br />

lactations (4252.0 kg <strong>of</strong> milk). In<br />

the opinion <strong>of</strong> the authors, twin pregnancy<br />

decreases significantly milk performance<br />

only during duration <strong>of</strong> lactation.<br />

Similar results were obtained by Wood<br />

(1975) and Szarek and Feleńczak (1978);<br />

they reported that after the multiple parturition,<br />

the cows reached higher milk<br />

yield as compared to other lactations. On<br />

the other hand, Sawa (1994) has stated<br />

that after multiple calving, the decrease<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk yield occurred. Sawa (1994) similarly<br />

as Skrzypek et al. (1989) reports<br />

that the natural twin pregnancies occur<br />

more frequently in the cows with higher<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> HF genes.<br />

Basic reproduction indicators in cattle<br />

include, first <strong>of</strong> all, length <strong>of</strong> pregnancy<br />

and length <strong>of</strong> calving-to conception<br />

interwal and inter-calving periods.<br />

The duration time <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancy<br />

is shorter than a single gestation period<br />

(Gregory, Echternkamp, 1990; Sawa,<br />

1994; Echternkamp, Gregory, 1999).<br />

Echternkamp et al. (1999) analysed<br />

also the relationship between the length<br />

<strong>of</strong> twin gestation and sex <strong>of</strong> fetuses. The<br />

longest duration <strong>of</strong> pregnancy occurred


94 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> various-sex twins (276.0 days)<br />

and the shortest one <strong>–</strong> in one fetus females<br />

(275.1 days) and in one fetus males it<br />

was equal to 275.8 days. The studies<br />

confirmed that the sex <strong>of</strong> twins did not<br />

affect (P < 0.1) the length <strong>of</strong> gestation.<br />

Many authors indicate elongation <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction indices <strong>–</strong> calving-to conception<br />

interwal and inter-calving periods in<br />

cows after multiple pregnancy as compared<br />

to the same parameters before multiple<br />

pregnancy (Goszczyński, Skulmowski,<br />

1977; 1994; Sawa, 1994). On the<br />

other hand, Szarek, Feleńczak (1978) and<br />

Kuźma R., Kuźma K. (1994) satte that<br />

mothers <strong>of</strong> twins are equivalent in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertility in comparison to mothers <strong>of</strong><br />

single calves.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the studies was to determine<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancy on<br />

milk performance and reproduction indices<br />

<strong>of</strong> cows.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Material for the studies included the data<br />

from breeding documentation <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Federation <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeders and Milk<br />

Producers. The results <strong>of</strong> cow performance<br />

covered the period from 1.01.2002<br />

to 21.12.2007 and concerned farms, situated<br />

in the Mazovian voivodeship. The<br />

analysis included 6755 cows in which at<br />

least one multiple calving had place. The<br />

collected data concerned yield <strong>of</strong> milk, fat<br />

and protein and also, percentage content<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mentioned components in the milk<br />

in preceding, parallel and directly subsequent<br />

lactation (after multiple gestation),<br />

length <strong>of</strong> inter-pregnancy and calving-to<br />

conception interwal directly before and<br />

after multiple gestation and the length <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy duration.<br />

When evaluating milk performance,<br />

the cows with 305-day lactation and shorter<br />

but not less than 260-day long, were considered.<br />

The data on calving <strong>of</strong> the cows<br />

in the Mazovian voivodeship derived<br />

from annual publications <strong>of</strong> the National<br />

Centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding (2002<strong>–</strong>2006)<br />

and Polish Federation <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeders<br />

and Milk Producers (2007<strong>–</strong>2008).<br />

The obtained data were statistically<br />

developed, using one-factor variance<br />

analysis (ANOVA) in programme SPSS<br />

Statistics 17.0.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Cow milk performance<br />

The results concerning the productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> cows in multiple and single pregnancy<br />

in the years 2002<strong>–</strong>2007 are contained in<br />

Table 1.<br />

The cows with multiple pregnancies<br />

gave more milk (6212.3 kg) in comparison<br />

to the mean performance <strong>of</strong> the cows<br />

with a single gestation (5864.4 kg). The<br />

mentioned difference amounted to 347.9<br />

kg <strong>of</strong> milk. Besides it, from the cows<br />

<strong>–</strong> mothers <strong>of</strong> twins and triples, higher<br />

mean fat and protein yield was obtained<br />

whereas the mean percentage content<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mentioned utility components in<br />

milk was lower. A big group <strong>of</strong> animals<br />

and genetic diversity may suggest that<br />

the discussed results are objective.<br />

Similar results are reported by Litwińczuk<br />

et al. (1987) who state that multiple<br />

births do not lower milk productivity.<br />

In opinion <strong>of</strong> the authors, the cows with<br />

multiple pregnancies are characterized<br />

by higher milk performance (4152 kg) as<br />

compared to the cows with a single gestation<br />

(3846.8 kg).


Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies on cow milk production... 95<br />

TABLE 1. Average milk yield <strong>of</strong> cows under control in Mazovia voivodeship<br />

Cows with single pregnancy Cows with multiple pregnancy<br />

yield yield<br />

Year<br />

n<br />

milk<br />

fat protein<br />

milk<br />

fat<br />

n<br />

(kg) kg % kg % (kg) kg % kg %<br />

2002 55 052 5 495.4 227.88 4.15 179.85 3.27 633 5 815.2 238.21 4.1 189.56 3.26<br />

2003 60 632 5 517.2 229.91 4.17 181.89 3.29 711 5 848.7 237.4 4.07 191.71 3.28<br />

2004 64 966 5 759.6 240.03 4.16 188.97 3.28 962 5 993.1 246.14 4.13 195.80 3.28<br />

2005 72 657 6 034.7 251.87 4.17 198.85 3.29 1 084 6 398.3 260.6 4.09 208.81 3.27<br />

2006 77 192 6 170.9 256.86 4.16 202.83 3.29 1 194 6 573.0 266.12 4.07 214.22 3.26<br />

2007 81 669 6 208.6 261.86 4.22 205.84 3.31 1 215 6 645.6 271.16 4.11 216.93 3.27<br />

Total 68 695 5 864.4 244.74 4.17 193.04 3.29 967 6 212.3 253.27 4.1 202.84 3.27<br />

When analyzing the data contained<br />

in Table 2, we may state that the lowest<br />

milk production occurs before multiple<br />

pregnancy (6135.14 kg), somewhat<br />

higher in lactation which is a result <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple pregnancy (6287.83 kg) and<br />

the highest one occurs in the successive<br />

lactation (6615.31 kg). The mentioned<br />

differences were statistically confirmed<br />

(p ≤ 0.01). In the analysed population,<br />

the increase <strong>of</strong> yield together with the<br />

age was expected because the evaluation<br />

concerned the successive lactations. The<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> mother’s demand on nutrients<br />

which are directed for growth <strong>of</strong> two<br />

fetuses is probably the reason for the<br />

lowered yield in lactation preceding twin<br />

delivery. Also, the mean fat and protein<br />

yields (expressed in kg) differ highly significantly<br />

each other.<br />

The similar results were obtained by<br />

Wood (1975), Szarek and Feleńczak<br />

(1978) who stated that productivity <strong>of</strong><br />

cows in the lactation after multiple parturition<br />

was increased. In the experiment<br />

<strong>of</strong> Litwińczuk et al. (1987) similar<br />

results were obtained: the lowest yield<br />

was recorded in the lactation before twin<br />

birth (4103.7 kg <strong>of</strong> milk), the higher one<br />

<strong>–</strong> after twin delivery (4174.3 kg) and<br />

the highest milk yield was found in the<br />

remaining lactations (4252 kg). As it was<br />

reported by Litwińczuk et al. (1987), it<br />

results probably from the lower productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cow in a final lactation period<br />

when the greater part <strong>of</strong> nutrients is<br />

directed by organism for nutrition <strong>of</strong> two<br />

fetuses.<br />

The lowering effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancy<br />

on cow productivity is also confirmed<br />

by the studies <strong>of</strong> other authors<br />

(Skrzypek et al., 1989). The authors explain<br />

that the reason for decrease <strong>of</strong> the yield


96 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

TABLE 2. Cows productivity in lactation before and after multiple calving<br />

Average yield<br />

Lactation<br />

n<br />

fat<br />

protein<br />

milk (kg)<br />

kg % kg %<br />

Before multiple pregnancy 5 764 6 135.14 A 252.05 A 4.13 198.59 A 3.24<br />

After multiple pregnancy 5 799 6 287.83 B 256.23 B 4.10 205.27 B 3.27<br />

Subsequent 3 002 6 615.31 A.B 272.48 A.B 4.14 214.23 A. B 3.24<br />

A-A <strong>–</strong> Statistical differences significant at P ≤ 0.01.<br />

is insufficient coverage <strong>of</strong> nutritional<br />

requirements during duration <strong>of</strong> such<br />

pregnancy.<br />

Sawa (1994) states that in the lactation<br />

parallel with the multiple pregnancy, the<br />

highest milk yield is recorded and after<br />

twin calving <strong>–</strong> it decreases and is by 10%<br />

lower as compared to the previous lactation.<br />

REPRODUCTION INDICES<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancy was<br />

279.5 days, i.e. by three days shorter than<br />

the theoretical value (282 days).<br />

Table 3 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

duration time <strong>of</strong> pregnancy in relation to<br />

the type <strong>of</strong> gestation. The length <strong>of</strong> triplet<br />

pregnancy, as it has been reveled, is<br />

shorter (278.7 days) as compared to twin<br />

gestation (279.5 days). The mentioned<br />

differences have not been, however, statistically<br />

confirmed.<br />

In the experiment, the relationship<br />

between the length <strong>of</strong> twin pregnancy<br />

and sex <strong>of</strong> fetuses was also considered<br />

(Tab. 4).<br />

Similarly as in the studies, conducted<br />

by Echternkamp and Gregory (1999), the<br />

longest pregnancy was recorded in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> various sex twins (2822.6 days) and<br />

the shortest one <strong>–</strong> in one sex female twins<br />

(276.4 days). The sex <strong>of</strong> fetuses affects,<br />

therefore, the length <strong>of</strong> gestation period.<br />

TABLE 3. Multiple pregnancy lenght (days)<br />

depending on pregnancy type<br />

Multiple<br />

pregnency<br />

Quantity<br />

Pregnency lenght<br />

(days)<br />

Twin 559 279.5<br />

Triple 3 278.7<br />

TABLE 4. Twin pregnancy lenght (days) depending<br />

on foetus sex<br />

Twins’ sex<br />

Calves<br />

number<br />

Pregnency lenght<br />

(days)<br />

♂♂ 4 172 281.2<br />

♂♀ 5 118 282.6<br />

♀♀ 4 766 276.4<br />

Table 5 contains the indicators <strong>of</strong> cow<br />

fertility. It was found that after multiple<br />

pregnancy, they were decreased. The<br />

Calving-to-conception interwal in the<br />

analysed cows before multiple gestation<br />

was equal to 144 days whereas that one<br />

after multiple calving <strong>–</strong> 139 days. The<br />

mentioned differences were statistically<br />

insignificant. Calving-to-conception<br />

interwal in twins-delivering females was<br />

therefore longer than the theoretical one.<br />

As it was reported by authors (Grodzki et<br />

al. 2002), the time between calving and<br />

the next breeding should be found in the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 60<strong>–</strong>90 days. The reason for the<br />

obtained results lies probably in the fact<br />

that at present, the cows with the higher


Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies on cow milk production... 97<br />

TABLE 5. Fertility indices <strong>of</strong> lactating cows directly before and after multiple calving<br />

Pregnency<br />

lenght<br />

(days)<br />

Calving-to-conception interwal (days)<br />

n<br />

before<br />

multiple<br />

pregnancy<br />

n<br />

after<br />

multiple<br />

pregnancy<br />

n<br />

Calving interwal (days)<br />

before<br />

multiple<br />

pregnancy<br />

n<br />

after<br />

multiple<br />

pregnancy<br />

279.5 3 047 144 1 582 139 6 620 445 A 4 386 425 A<br />

A-A <strong>–</strong> Statistical differences significant at P ≤ 0.01.<br />

TABLE 6. Average lenght <strong>of</strong> intercalving periods<br />

(days) in Mazovia voivodeship and in Poland in<br />

2002<strong>–</strong>2007<br />

Year Mazovia voivodeship Poland<br />

2002 400 408<br />

2003 407 414<br />

2004 413 419<br />

2005 410 416<br />

2006 414 420<br />

2007 423 426<br />

Average 411 417<br />

production potential are milked for<br />

a longer period.<br />

The obtained results occurred to be<br />

completely different than those ones,<br />

obtained by the remaining authors. In the<br />

opinion <strong>of</strong> Sawa (1994), fertility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows after multiple births deteriorates.<br />

According to the studies <strong>of</strong> the author,<br />

difference between the calving-to-conception<br />

interwal before multi-litter gestation<br />

and after it, is equal to 4 days.<br />

From the submitted data (Tab. 5) it is<br />

resulted that the length <strong>of</strong> inter-calving<br />

periods in the cows after multiple birth is<br />

abbreviated. Before multiple gestations,<br />

it amounted to 445 days and after multiple<br />

pregnancies <strong>–</strong> by 20 days shorter.<br />

The mentioned differences occurred to<br />

be highly significant. In case <strong>of</strong> breeding<br />

cows, managed in the intensive system,<br />

the discussed index should vary within<br />

the limits <strong>of</strong> 365 days (Grodzki, 2002).<br />

When comparing the obtained results<br />

with the mean inter-calving periods for<br />

the cows in the Mazovian voivodeship<br />

and in the country in the years 2002<strong>–</strong>2007<br />

(Tab. 6) it is stated that the discussed fertility<br />

indicator is longer by 6 days in the<br />

cows covered with milk recording in the<br />

national population.<br />

In the opinion <strong>of</strong> Litwińczuk et al.<br />

(1987), the length <strong>of</strong> inter-calving periods<br />

is subjected to significant prolongation<br />

in the cows with multiple pregnancies<br />

(379 days) as well as in the cows<br />

with a single birth (381 days). From the<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> the authors, it results however<br />

that the discussed index before multiple<br />

birth is equal to 370.3 days and after<br />

multiple delivery <strong>–</strong> 392.8 days). Also,<br />

according to Goszczyński and Skulmowski<br />

(1977), the inter-calving period is<br />

prolonged after twin parturition.<br />

R. Kuźma and K. Kuźma (1994) consider<br />

that fertility <strong>of</strong> the cows with multiple<br />

gestation, as compared to the cows<br />

with a single pregnancy, is not much<br />

worse. Similar statement was expressed<br />

by Szarek and Feleńczak (1978). In their<br />

opinion on fertility indices, mothers <strong>of</strong><br />

twins are equivalent to mothers <strong>of</strong> single<br />

calves.<br />

Obtaining <strong>of</strong> the prolonged inter-pregnancy<br />

period and calving-to conception<br />

interwal and <strong>of</strong> the abbreviated length


98 T. Nałęcz-Tarwacka, K. Palińska, H. Grodzki<br />

<strong>of</strong> gestation by other authors explains<br />

decrease <strong>of</strong> milk yield in the cows with<br />

multiple births.<br />

In the opinion <strong>of</strong> Max (1996), however,<br />

a single administration <strong>of</strong> GnRH to<br />

the cows allows approximating fertility<br />

indices to the indicators, occurring in<br />

females with a single gestation.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Multiple pregnancies do not lower milk<br />

performance. The cows with multi-fetus<br />

gestation gave more milk (6212 kg) in<br />

relation to the cows with a single litter<br />

(5864 kg). The lowest milk production<br />

was recorded for the cows before multiple<br />

pregnancy (6135 kg), somewhat<br />

higher <strong>–</strong> in lactation, being a result <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple gestation (6287 kg) and the<br />

highest one was found in the successive<br />

lactation (6615 kg).<br />

Duration time <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancy<br />

was equal to 279 days in average and it<br />

was affected by he sex <strong>of</strong> fetuses. The<br />

calving-to conception interwal as well<br />

as inter-calving period was abbreviated<br />

after multiple parturition. Both fertility<br />

parameters occurred to be longer than the<br />

theoretical ones and besides it, the intercalving<br />

period was longer than the mean<br />

for the voivodeship and the country.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ECHTERNKAMP S.E., GREGORY K.E., 1999:<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> twinning on gestation length, retained<br />

placenta, and dystocia. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Science<br />

77, 39<strong>–</strong>47.<br />

GOSZCZYŃSKI J., SKULMOWSKI J.P., 1977:<br />

Obserwacje nad występowaniem ciąż bliźniaczych<br />

w stadzie bydła rasy charolaise. Prace<br />

i Mat. Zoot., 14, 85<strong>–</strong>93.<br />

GREGORY K.E., ECHTERNKAMP S.E. et al.,<br />

1990: Twinning in cattle III. Effects <strong>of</strong> twinning<br />

on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival,<br />

calf growth and cow productivity. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science 68, 3133<strong>–</strong>3144.<br />

GRODZKI H., 2002: Hodowla i użytkowanie<br />

bydła. Wyd. <strong>SGGW</strong>, Warszawa.<br />

Krajowe Centrum Hodowli Zwierząt, 2006: Ocena<br />

wartości użytkowej krów oraz ocena i selekcja<br />

buhajów. Wyniki oceny za 2005 rok.<br />

Krajowe Centrum Hodowli Zwierząt, 2005: Ocena<br />

wartości użytkowej krów oraz ocena i selekcja<br />

buhajów. Wyniki oceny za 2004 rok.<br />

Krajowe Centrum Hodowli Zwierząt, 2004: Ocena<br />

wartości użytkowej krów oraz ocena i selekcja<br />

buhajów. Wyniki oceny za 2003 rok.<br />

Krajowe Centrum Hodowli Zwierząt, 2003: Ocena<br />

wartości użytkowej krów oraz ocena i selekcja<br />

buhajów. Wyniki oceny za 2002 rok.<br />

KUŹMA R., KUŹMA K., 1994: Występowanie<br />

wycieleń mnogich u krów mlecznych w warunkach<br />

naturalnych i ich wpływ na poród, okres<br />

poporodowy i płodność. Przegląd Hodowlany<br />

9, 1<strong>–</strong>5.<br />

LITWIŃCZUK Z., MAJEWSKA E., MAJEWSKI<br />

Z., 1987: Wpływ porodów bliźniaczych na wydajność<br />

i płodność krów rasy ncb. Medycyna<br />

Weterynaryjna, 2, 111<strong>–</strong>114.<br />

MAX A., 1996: Ciąża bliźniacza u bydła. Medycyna<br />

Weterynaryjna 52, 85<strong>–</strong>88.<br />

Polska Federacja Hodowców Bydła i Producentów<br />

Mleka, 2008: Ocena i hodowla bydła mlecznego.<br />

Dane za 2007 rok.<br />

Polska Federacja Hodowców Bydła i Producentów<br />

Mleka, 2007: Ocena i hodowla bydła mlecznego.<br />

Dane za 2006 rok.<br />

SAWA A., 1994: Wpływ ciąży bliźniaczej na użytkowość<br />

krów. Zeszyty Naukowe <strong>–</strong> Zootechnika,<br />

189, 26, 7<strong>–</strong>14.<br />

SKRZYPEK R., BARANIAK R., GRYCZ J.,<br />

1989: Wpływ ciąży bliźniaczej na użytkowość<br />

mleczną, rozrodczą i brakowanie krów oraz<br />

żywotność urodzonych cieląt. Roczniki AR<br />

Poznań 38, 83<strong>–</strong>94.<br />

SZAREK J., FELEŃCZAK A., 1978: Przydatność<br />

do chowu cieląt pochodzących z urodzeń<br />

bliźniaczych. Przegląd Hodowlany 12, 12<strong>–</strong>13.<br />

WOOD P.D.P., 1975: A note on the effect <strong>of</strong> twin<br />

births on production in the subsequent lactation.<br />

Anim. Prod., 20, 421<strong>–</strong>424.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ ciąży mnogiej na użytkowość<br />

mleczną i wskaźniki rozrodu krów. Celem


Effect <strong>of</strong> multiple pregnancies on cow milk production... 99<br />

badań było określenie wpływu ciąży mnogiej na<br />

użytkowość mleczną i wskaźniki rozrodu krów.<br />

Badaniami objęto 6755 krów, u których wystąpiło<br />

przynajmniej jedno mnogie wycielenie w okresie<br />

6 lat. Zebrano dane dotyczące użytkowości mlecznej<br />

krów w laktacji poprzedniej, równoległej<br />

i bezpośrednio po ciąży mnogiej oraz czasu trwania<br />

ciąży i wskaźników rozrodu krów <strong>–</strong> okresów<br />

międzyocieleniowych i międzyciążowych w czasie<br />

przed ciążą i po ciąży mnogiej. Stwierdzono,<br />

że ciąża mnoga nie obniża użytkowości mlecznej.<br />

Po porodzie mnogim badane wskaźniki rozrodu<br />

uległy skróceniu w porównaniu do ich długości<br />

przed ciążą mnogą.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Author’s address:<br />

Teresa Nałęcz-Tarwacka<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 101<strong>–</strong>117<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino ewes with rams<br />

<strong>of</strong> German Mutton Merino on growth rate and slaughter value<br />

<strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1 , BEATA KUCZYŃSKA 3<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

3<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino<br />

ewes with rams <strong>of</strong> German Mutton Merino on<br />

growth rate and slaughter value <strong>of</strong> their <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />

The research was carried out in 2005<strong>–</strong>2007 on the<br />

5 sheep flocks owned by the companies <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural<br />

Property Agency (APA) in Zachodniopomorskie<br />

and Wielkopolskie voivodeships. The<br />

experimental material (n = 1184) consisted <strong>of</strong> the<br />

female and male lambs <strong>of</strong> pure Polish Merino<br />

(PM) and PM F1-crosses with German Mutton<br />

Merino (GMM) born in 2005<strong>–</strong>2007. The group<br />

<strong>of</strong> 75 male-rams were fattened and the evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> body growth development, live body measurements<br />

as well as carcass and mld meat quality was<br />

researched. The crossing <strong>of</strong> PM with GMM did<br />

not affected the body growth development as well<br />

as body weights <strong>of</strong> lambs. However, the differences<br />

between farms were established, which indicated<br />

the necessity <strong>of</strong> improvement the rearing<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> both sexes. The analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> slaughter traits as well as the carcass quality<br />

presented the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on the examined<br />

traits. The huge diversification <strong>of</strong> trade value,<br />

slaughter value, meatiness and quality <strong>of</strong> meat<br />

was observed between all farms, which indicated<br />

the huge impact <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

production on the studied traits. The interaction<br />

genotype x environment showed huge impact <strong>of</strong><br />

the place <strong>of</strong> breeding and the genotype <strong>of</strong> male<br />

lambs on the production traits.<br />

Key words: sheep, crossing, Polish Merino, German<br />

Mutton Merino, body weight, carcass quality,<br />

meat quality.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The actions undertaken to reduce the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> inbreeding in sheep flocks <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino (PM) caused the initiative, which<br />

aimed to import the rams <strong>of</strong> German<br />

Mutton Merino (GMM) due to the Sheep<br />

Breeding Program in the companies <strong>of</strong><br />

The Agricultural Property Agency (APA)<br />

(Niżnikowski, Oprządek, 2004). German<br />

Mutton Merino is widely described in<br />

the scientific papers (Stritmatter, 2004)<br />

and its meat traits would be easily introduced<br />

into the PM. The group <strong>of</strong> 20 rams<br />

<strong>of</strong> GMM was imported to five flocks <strong>of</strong><br />

APA companies (Dobrzyniewo, Garzyn,<br />

Lubiana, Żołędnica and Żydowo). Each<br />

<strong>of</strong> companies possessed 4 GMM rams<br />

and they started one-stage crossing with<br />

PM ewes. The effects <strong>of</strong> this crossings<br />

due to the slaughter characteristics and<br />

meat quality <strong>of</strong> pure PM lambs and the<br />

F1-crosses with GMM was presented in<br />

this study. Obtained results were gathered<br />

in tables and properly commented.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> growth development and<br />

live body weight. The research was


102 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

carried out in 2005<strong>–</strong>2007 on the 5 sheep<br />

flocks owned by the Companies <strong>of</strong> The<br />

Agricultural Property Agency (APA) in<br />

Dobrzyniewo, Lubiana, Garzyn, Żołędnica<br />

and Żydowo. The experimental material<br />

were the female and male lambs born<br />

in the experimental years. The data concerning<br />

the lambs’ body weights at 56 day<br />

<strong>of</strong> life were collected in 2005<strong>–</strong>2006 from<br />

the breeding books in all APA’s companies,<br />

whereas the evaluation <strong>of</strong> body<br />

weight at birth and daily gains till 56 day<br />

<strong>of</strong> life was provided in 2007, because<br />

these data were possible to obtain only in<br />

one flock (Dobrzyniewo). The statistical<br />

calculations were done with the LSM<br />

method (Anon. 2004) using the SPSS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware (v.12.0). The statistical model<br />

considered the effects <strong>of</strong> genotype, year <strong>of</strong><br />

lambing, flock, sex <strong>of</strong> lambs and type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth <strong>of</strong> lambs as well as the double-factor<br />

interactions <strong>of</strong> genotype × sex <strong>of</strong> lambs,<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> lambs × sex <strong>of</strong> lambs,<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth × genotype, year <strong>of</strong> lambing<br />

× genotype and flock × genotype, on the<br />

body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> life considering<br />

the lambs <strong>of</strong> following genotypes: PM<br />

and 50% GMM. In case <strong>of</strong> body weight<br />

at birth and daily gains till 56 day <strong>of</strong> age<br />

the similar statistical model was applied,<br />

however the effects <strong>of</strong> year <strong>of</strong> lambing<br />

and flock as well as the interaction were<br />

excluded. Due to these traits, the lambs <strong>of</strong><br />

three genotype groups (PM, 50% GMM<br />

and 25% GMM) bred in Dobrzyniewo<br />

were included into the studies.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> slaughter value, carcass<br />

quality and meat quality <strong>of</strong> ramlambs.<br />

The research was carried out in<br />

2005<strong>–</strong>2007 on five sheep flocks. The<br />

experimental material consisted <strong>of</strong> ramlambs<br />

belonged to the following genotype<br />

groups: Polish Merino (PM) and the<br />

F1-crosses with German Mutton Merino<br />

(GMM). The lambs were bred in massive<br />

buildings and they were fed accordingly<br />

to the norms (Osikowski et al., 1993)<br />

using the own-made fodders (silage,<br />

herbage, hay, dehydrated forage and concentrates).<br />

When the lambs achieved the<br />

slaughter weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg (±1.5 kg), the<br />

body measurements at live animals were<br />

collected regarding: length and round <strong>of</strong><br />

foreshrank, height in withers, length <strong>of</strong><br />

body, spread and depth <strong>of</strong> chest, length<br />

and spread <strong>of</strong> head (Niżnikowski, 1979).<br />

Then the lambs were slaughtered and the<br />

carcasses were chilled in 4°C throughout<br />

24 hours. The following items were<br />

estimated:<br />

I. Slaughter traits: age at slaughter,<br />

gross dressing percentage, weight <strong>of</strong><br />

carcass and weight <strong>of</strong> skin (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963).<br />

II. Carcass quality due to the EUROP<br />

classification: conformation class<br />

(E, U, R, O, P), fat class (1 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

lowest fat content, 2, 3, 4, 5 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

highest fat content), fat consistency<br />

(very cohesive, cohesive, tender, very<br />

tender) and fat colour (white or coloured).<br />

III. Carcass measurements: length and<br />

round <strong>of</strong> foreshrank (Niżnikowski,<br />

1979), spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint, depth <strong>of</strong><br />

leg, length <strong>of</strong> leg, round <strong>of</strong> leg, leg<br />

index (round <strong>of</strong> leg/ length <strong>of</strong> leg ×<br />

100), loin eye area, fat cover over<br />

loin eye (Nawara et al., 1963).<br />

IV. Carcass cuts composition (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963): kidney with fat, both<br />

shanks (front and hind), shoulder,<br />

neck, middle neck, rib back, loin,<br />

leg, breast and the valuable cuts (leg,<br />

rib back, loin and tenderloin);


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 103<br />

V. Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg: lean,<br />

bone and fat (Nawara et al., 1963);<br />

VI. Physical and chemical characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle: the pH-24<br />

value as well as the water, protein,<br />

fat and dry matter content (AOAC,<br />

1990);<br />

VII. Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the intramuscular<br />

fat <strong>of</strong> mld muscle. The fat extraction<br />

was prepared due to the Röse-<br />

-Gottlieb method (AOAC, 1990).<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile composition was<br />

determined with the gas chromatography<br />

due to the norms PN-EN ISO<br />

5508 (1996).<br />

Statistical calculations were done<br />

using the LSM analysis in the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(v.12; Anon., 2004). The statistical<br />

model included the following variation<br />

sources: genotype, year and type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth and flock as well as the interactions<br />

(genotype × flock and genotype × year).<br />

Due to the traits mentioned in the paragraphs<br />

<strong>of</strong> I, III, IV (estimated in kg, cm<br />

and mm) and V (in kg), the regression on<br />

body weight at slaughter was also included<br />

to the model. The effects <strong>of</strong> EUROP<br />

and fat class were extra integrated to the<br />

model in case <strong>of</strong> the traits <strong>of</strong> slaughter<br />

value, carcass measurements and physical<br />

and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld<br />

muscle, including the fatty acid pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

as well. When the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on<br />

the researched traits was observed, the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the differences between<br />

factor levels were checked out with F-test<br />

(Ruszczyc, 1981). The traits mentioned in<br />

II point are shown in table.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on<br />

body weights and growth development<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs was presented in Tables 1<strong>–</strong>3.<br />

The accidental statistical significance <strong>of</strong><br />

the variation sources on the examined<br />

traits was presented in Table 1. No effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> genotype on any <strong>of</strong> the investigated<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on body weights and growth development basing<br />

on data from Dobrzyniewo in 2007 and the other flocks in 2005<strong>–</strong>2006<br />

Items<br />

genotype<br />

year <strong>of</strong> lambing<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

flock<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

genotype *<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> lambs *<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

Interactions<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> lambs *<br />

genotype<br />

year <strong>of</strong> lambing*<br />

genotype<br />

flock*<br />

genotype<br />

N x S<br />

Body weight<br />

at birth (kg) NS <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS X NS NS X <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 223 4.12 0.08<br />

Body weight<br />

at 56 day (kg) NS NS XX XX NS X NS NS NS NS 1184 18.50 0.12<br />

Daily gains<br />

(g/day) from<br />

birth till 56 day NS <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS NS NS NS NS <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 223 289.00 1.00<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


104 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> flock on body weight at 56 day<br />

Flock<br />

Item<br />

Dobrzyniewo (A)<br />

n 208 243 509 176 48<br />

LSM 18.79 18.78 20.01 18.43 16.46<br />

Body weight at 56 day (kg)<br />

SE 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.43<br />

* CE CE ABDE CE ABCD<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a,..., e <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A..., E <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

Garzyn (B)<br />

Lubiana (C)<br />

Żołędnica (D)<br />

Żydowo (E)<br />

TABLE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex and type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> lambs on body weights and growth development<br />

Items<br />

Sex <strong>of</strong> lambs Type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

male female singles twins<br />

N 110 123 58 175<br />

Body weight at birth (kg)<br />

LSM 4.13 4.11 4.29X 3.95<br />

SE 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.09<br />

N 573 611 527 657<br />

Body weight at 56 day (kg)<br />

LSM 18.98XX 18.03 18.41 18.60<br />

SE 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.18<br />

N 110 123 58 175<br />

Daily gains (g/day) from birth till 56 day LSM 297 282 293 285<br />

SE 12 13 1.5 9<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

traits was observed. Also the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

interactions was not compatible to the<br />

expectations. However, the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

flock and sex was observed in the body<br />

weight at 56 day (p ≤ 0.01). Due to the<br />

body weight at 56 day the highest values<br />

were obtained in flock <strong>of</strong> Lubiana,<br />

and the lowest in the flock owned by<br />

Żydowo (Tab. 2). As it was reported in<br />

other studies, the ram-lambs dominated<br />

over female-lambs at this age, as well<br />

as the single lambs were significantly<br />

heavier than the twins (Tab. 3). In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the daily gains till 56 day <strong>of</strong> life, no<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions<br />

were observed. The results indicated that<br />

the genotype <strong>of</strong> lambs did not varied<br />

the values <strong>of</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> body growth<br />

development, which allowed to conclude<br />

that the use <strong>of</strong> GMM in crossing with PM<br />

did not bring the negative effects.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> subjective evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcasses due to the EUROP classification<br />

was presented in Table 4. The<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> male-lambs carcasses was<br />

similar in both genetic groups, however<br />

the carcasses <strong>of</strong> F1 crosses with GMM<br />

were more desirable. Most <strong>of</strong> carcasses<br />

were classified to the E, U and R categories,<br />

which are the typical carcasses


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 105<br />

for the lamb market in the EU. Only one<br />

carcass <strong>of</strong> class O per the genetic group<br />

were observed and both were from the<br />

flocks <strong>of</strong> Dobrzyniewo and Żołędnica.<br />

The carcasses <strong>of</strong> class O are for the food<br />

processing purposes. The evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

fat classification showed that majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> the investigated carcasses belonged<br />

to the most desired fat classes (2 and<br />

3). Relatively high number <strong>of</strong> carcasses<br />

were classified to the category 4 in PM,<br />

which was not observed in carcasses<br />

from Dobrzyniewo. The leanest carcasses<br />

were observed in flock <strong>of</strong> Garzyn.<br />

Accordingly to the fat colour, the whiter<br />

fat was observed on carcasses from F1-<br />

-crosses with GMM, which is more desirable<br />

due to the EU market requirements.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> the fat consistency, both genetic<br />

groups presented similar results, whereas<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> carcasses were qualified to<br />

the fat groups <strong>of</strong> very cohesive and cohesive.<br />

Carcasses <strong>of</strong> tender and very tender<br />

fat were found in flocks from Lubiana<br />

and Żydowo. The carcasses <strong>of</strong> the best<br />

trade quality were observed in flocks<br />

from Garzyn, Lubiana and Żydowo and<br />

all carcasses from these flocks were<br />

TABLE 4. Subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass quality (heads) due to the sex <strong>of</strong> lambs and flock<br />

Genotype<br />

Flock<br />

Items<br />

Σ<br />

Polish<br />

Merino<br />

F 1<br />

Polish Merino*<br />

German Mutton<br />

Merino<br />

Dobrzyniewo<br />

Garzyn<br />

Lubiana<br />

Żołędnica<br />

Żydowo<br />

EUROP class (categories):<br />

E<br />

13<br />

U<br />

42<br />

R<br />

18<br />

O<br />

2<br />

P<br />

0<br />

Fat class (categories):<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Fat colour:<br />

coloured<br />

white<br />

Fat consistency:<br />

very cohesive<br />

cohesive<br />

tender<br />

very tender<br />

2<br />

29<br />

34<br />

10<br />

0<br />

18<br />

57<br />

16<br />

41<br />

12<br />

6<br />

4<br />

25<br />

8<br />

1<br />

0<br />

2<br />

16<br />

14<br />

6<br />

0<br />

11<br />

27<br />

9<br />

20<br />

6<br />

3<br />

9<br />

17<br />

10<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

13<br />

20<br />

4<br />

0<br />

7<br />

30<br />

7<br />

21<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

7<br />

4<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

9<br />

2<br />

8<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

9<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

0<br />

2<br />

10<br />

3<br />

5<br />

3<br />

1<br />

0<br />

9<br />

3<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

4<br />

6<br />

2<br />

0<br />

3<br />

9<br />

0<br />

7<br />

4<br />

1<br />

4<br />

0<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1<br />

0<br />

4<br />

3<br />

1<br />

5<br />

1<br />

0<br />

8<br />

17<br />

7<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2<br />

11<br />

17<br />

2<br />

0<br />

6<br />

26<br />

10<br />

16<br />

2<br />

4


106 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

classified to the most desired lamb meat<br />

group on the EU market. Comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

both experimental groups consisted <strong>of</strong><br />

male-lambs indicated the better quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcasses from the F1-crosses with<br />

GMM than the pure PM due to the trade<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> carcasses.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions<br />

on the live body measurements,<br />

slaughter value and carcass measurements<br />

were presented in Table 5. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

genotype was observed only on the height<br />

<strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm). The effect <strong>of</strong> flock<br />

was observed on more <strong>of</strong> traits, as well<br />

as the effect <strong>of</strong> the year, which should be<br />

understood as the effect <strong>of</strong> environment<br />

in different years and flocks. The EUROP<br />

carcass classification affected the body<br />

weight at slaughter, carcass yield and leg<br />

index. No effect <strong>of</strong> fat classification on<br />

the investigated traits was observed. The<br />

investigated interactions were observed<br />

TABLE 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on live body and carcass measurements (n = 75)<br />

Items<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

Interactions<br />

Fat<br />

genotype<br />

flock year<br />

EUROP<br />

class genotype * genotype *<br />

flock year<br />

x S<br />

Live body measurements (cm)<br />

Height in withers NS NS NS NS NS 58.48 0.54<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> body NS X X NS NS 61.15 0.53<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS NS NS NS NS 11.03 0.14<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS X X NS NS 9.12 0.09<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head NS XX NS NS X 19.35 0.19<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head NS NS XX NS NS 10.77 0.13<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening NS NS NS NS NS 155.44 9.56<br />

Body weight at<br />

slaughter (kg) NS NS NS X NS NS NS 35.25 0.89<br />

Slaughter yield (%) NS NS XX X NS XX NS 43.81 1.00<br />

Pelt (kg) NS XX XX NS NS 3.38 0.06<br />

Carcass (kg) NS NS XX XX NS 16.03 0.20<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint<br />

(cm) NS XX NS NS NS 3.74 0.02<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS XX NS NS NS 21.23 0.33<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS XX NS NS NS 23.90 0.19<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS XX NS NS NS 38.49 0.25<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%) NS XX NS X NS NS NS 157.62 2.75<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> the loin<br />

eye (cm) NS NS NS NS NS 5.32 0.07<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin<br />

eye (cm) XX X X NS X 3.17 0.07<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) NS X X NS X 14.08 0.29<br />

Fat cover over loin<br />

eye (mm) NS XX XX NS NS 1.58 0.13<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 107<br />

at very limited level, whereas the most<br />

interesting was the effect <strong>of</strong> interaction<br />

genotype × flock on carcass yield and<br />

carcass weight.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen variation sources<br />

on the carcass cuts composition and<br />

tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg were presented<br />

in Table 6. The genotype affected sig-<br />

TABLE 6. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on carcass cuts composition and tissue characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> leg (n = 75)<br />

Items<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

Interactions<br />

Fat<br />

genotype<br />

flock year<br />

EUROP<br />

class genotype * genotype *<br />

flock year<br />

x S<br />

Half-carcass (kg) NS NS XX NS NS 7.99 0.08<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) NS X XX NS NS 0.16 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%) NS X NS NS NS NS NS 1.98 0.18<br />

Foreshank (kg) NS X NS NS NS 0.29 0.01<br />

Foreshank (%) NS X X NS NS NS NS 3.71 0.14<br />

Hideshank (kg) X XX NS NS NS 0.35 0.01<br />

Hideshank (%) NS X X NS NS NS NS 4.59 0.14<br />

Neck (kg) NS NS XX NS NS 0.65 0.02<br />

Neck (%) NS NS X NS NS NS NS 8.49 0.38<br />

Middle neck (kg) NS NS XX NS NS 0.52 0.01<br />

Middle neck (%) NS X X NS NS NS NS 6.41 0.26<br />

Shoulder (kg) NS NS NS NS NS 1.29 0.02<br />

Shoulder (%) NS NS XX NS XX NS NS 16.84 0.25<br />

Breast (kg) NS XX XX NS NS 1.33 0.02<br />

Breast (%) NS NS NS X NS NS NS 15.87 0.37<br />

Rib back (kg) NS XX XX NS NS 0.62 0.01<br />

Rib back (%) NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 7.74 0.24<br />

Loin (kg) NS NS NS NS NS 0.54 0.01<br />

Loin (%) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 6.80 0.25<br />

Tenderloin (kg) XX NS X NS NS 0.13 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%) X NS X NS NS NS NS 1.74 0.09<br />

Leg (kg) NS X XX X NS 2.20 0.03<br />

Leg (%) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 27.16 0.40<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS X XX NS NS 3.36 0.04<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 41.70 0.49<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Lean (kg) NS X XX NS NS 1.61 0.02<br />

Lean (%) NS XX NS XX NS NS NS 71.56 0.94<br />

Fat (kg) NS XX X NS NS 0.29 0.01<br />

Fat (%) NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 13.50 0.59<br />

Bone (kg) NS NS NS NS NS 0.28 0.01<br />

Bone (%) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 13.70 0.57<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


108 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 7. Effect <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on physical and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle (n = 75)<br />

Items<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

genotype flock year<br />

EUROP<br />

Fat<br />

class<br />

genotype *<br />

flock<br />

Physical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

Interactions<br />

genotype *<br />

year<br />

pH 24 NS XX NS X NS NS NS 5.53 0.02<br />

Water holding<br />

capacity (cm 2 ) NS XX XX NS NS NS NS 27.72 2.21<br />

Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle (%)<br />

Crude protein NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 21.35 0.98<br />

Fat NS NS NS X NS NS NS 3.15 0.28<br />

Dry matter NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 28.63 1.70<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat)<br />

C10:0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.19 0.02<br />

C12:0 NS X NS NS NS NS NS 0.33 0.05<br />

C14:0 NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 4.30 0.31<br />

C14:1 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.24 0.04<br />

C15:0 NS X NS NS NS NS NS 0.57 0.06<br />

C15:1 NS XX X NS X NS NS 0.24 0.02<br />

C16:0 NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 25.39 0.81<br />

C16:1 NS X NS NS NS NS NS 1.93 0.10<br />

C17:0 NS NS NS X NS NS NS 1.30 0.05<br />

C17:1 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.73 0.05<br />

C18:0 NS X NS NS NS NS NS 15.83 0.68<br />

C18:1c9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 33.96 1.40<br />

C18:2n6 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 3.17 0.22<br />

C18:3n3c NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.16 0.01<br />

C18:3n3t NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.34 0.03<br />

CLA NS XX NS X NS NS NS 0.42 0.03<br />

C20:1 X NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.14 0.03<br />

C20:3n3 NS X NS NS NS NS NS 0.14 0.02<br />

C20:4n6 NS XX X NS NS NS NS 0.53 0.07<br />

C20:5n3 NS XX NS NS NS NS NS 0.08 0.01<br />

C22:5n3 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.16 0.05<br />

C22:6n3 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.05 0.01<br />

SFA NS X NS NS NS NS NS 47.92 1.2<br />

MUFA-cis NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 39.78 1.53<br />

MUFA-trans NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1.12 0.06<br />

PUFAn3 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.43 0.06<br />

PUFAn6 NS XX X NS NS NS NS 0.53 0.07<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

x<br />

S


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 109<br />

nificantly the weight f hideshank (kg)<br />

and the weight and content <strong>of</strong> tenderloin<br />

(kg, %). As it was previously presented<br />

in Table 5, the effects <strong>of</strong> flock and year<br />

<strong>of</strong> research on the majority <strong>of</strong> traits,<br />

confirmed the significant effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />

environmental conditions on the<br />

presented results. However, the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

EUROP classes on the contents <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

and lean in leg (%) as well as the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

fat class on the content <strong>of</strong> shoulder (%)<br />

were observed. The effect <strong>of</strong> the interaction<br />

genotype × flock on weight <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

(kg) was observed.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> physical and chemical<br />

characteristics and fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

the mld muscle were presented in Table 7.<br />

In this case, the significant effect <strong>of</strong> genotype<br />

on the C 20:1 content was observed,<br />

whereas the effect <strong>of</strong> flock significantly<br />

affected majority <strong>of</strong> studied traits. The<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> year, EUROP classes and fat<br />

classes as well as the colour and consistency<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat affected the studied traits at<br />

definitely lower level. No effects <strong>of</strong> interactions<br />

on these traits were observed.<br />

The huge effect <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions<br />

on majority <strong>of</strong> studied traits was<br />

observed (Tabs 5, 6 and 7), concerning<br />

mainly the effect <strong>of</strong> the flock and then<br />

the other factors.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on the studied<br />

traits was presented in Table 8 and it was<br />

observed in case <strong>of</strong> height <strong>of</strong> loin eye,<br />

content <strong>of</strong> hideshank (%) and weight and<br />

content <strong>of</strong> tenderloin (kg, %) as well as<br />

the content <strong>of</strong> the C20:1 fatty acid in the<br />

mld muscle. The value <strong>of</strong> height <strong>of</strong> loin<br />

eye was statistically higher in the group<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Merino ram-lambs in contrary<br />

to the F1-crosses, whereas the opposite<br />

results were observed in the other traits.<br />

Therefore it was hard to recognize which<br />

<strong>of</strong> the genetic combinations was better<br />

due to the quality <strong>of</strong> carcass and meat.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> flock on the live body<br />

and carcass measurements, slaughter<br />

traits as well as the cuts’ composition,<br />

tissue characteristic <strong>of</strong> leg and mld<br />

muscle traits were presented in Table 9.<br />

Due to the live body measurements, the<br />

greatest body length was observed in the<br />

sheep flock in Dobrzyniewo, whereas<br />

the smallest was reported in Żydowo<br />

flock. The lowest values <strong>of</strong> round <strong>of</strong><br />

foreshank were observed in lambs in<br />

Żydowo and moreover in this flock and<br />

in Garzyn flock the longest heads were<br />

also reported as well. This leads to the<br />

conclusion that the lambs in Dobrzyniewo<br />

presented significantly larger body<br />

size in comparison to Żydowo flock.<br />

TABLE 8. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on chosen prameters <strong>of</strong> carcass and meat quality <strong>of</strong> lambs (n = 75)<br />

Genotype<br />

Items<br />

Polish Merino<br />

F 1<br />

Polish Merino × German Mutton Merino<br />

LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) 3.35XX 0.09 3.00 0.08<br />

Hideshank (kg) 0.34X 0.01 0.36X 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (kg) 0.12X 0.01 0.14 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%) 1.61X 0.11 1.85 0.10<br />

Fatty acid: C20:1 0.10X 0.04 0.18 0.04<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


110 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> pelt content provided<br />

quite different results, which might have<br />

been distorted due to the shearing time,<br />

whereas the results for the spread <strong>of</strong> hock<br />

joint was in close relationship with the<br />

results for the round <strong>of</strong> foreshank. The<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> leg characteristics presented the<br />

lowest values in Garzyn flock, whereas<br />

the longest legs were found in Lubiana<br />

and Dobrzyniewo flocks. Moreover the<br />

Dobrzyniewo flock presented the highest<br />

results in the round <strong>of</strong> leg, which<br />

was not confirmed by the weight <strong>of</strong> leg,<br />

which was the heaviest in Garzyn flock.<br />

The Garzyn flock presented also the best<br />

results <strong>of</strong> loin characteristics: high values<br />

<strong>of</strong> loin eye area and height <strong>of</strong> loin eye as<br />

well as the lowest values <strong>of</strong> fat cover over<br />

loin eye. These results suited to the data<br />

obtained for the EUROP carcass classification,<br />

which also presented a very<br />

good parameters <strong>of</strong> their trade quality<br />

required for the slaughter lambs. Evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fat classes was confirmed<br />

by the obtained values for the weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> kidney with fat, which were also the<br />

lowest in Garzyn flock. The analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

less valuable cuts composition, such as<br />

the weights <strong>of</strong> foreshank and backshank,<br />

middle neck and breast generally did not<br />

varied the quality <strong>of</strong> carcasses. Accordingly<br />

to the valuable cuts analysis (leg,<br />

tenderloin, rib back and loin), the their<br />

highest content was observed again in<br />

carcasses from the Garzyn flock. Nevertheless<br />

the best tissue composition <strong>of</strong><br />

leg (high lean content and low fat content)<br />

was presented in carcasses from<br />

Żołędnica and Żydowo flocks. The presented<br />

tendencies were already reported<br />

by other authors (Gruszecki et al., 2004,<br />

Niżnikowski, 1979).<br />

The physical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld<br />

muscle presented the lowest pH value <strong>of</strong><br />

meat from carcasses obtained in Dobrzyniewo<br />

and Garzyn flocks, whereas the<br />

water holding capacity was at the highest<br />

values in lamb meat from Dobrzyniewo<br />

and Lubiana flocks and the lowest values<br />

in Garzyn and Żołędnica. These results<br />

indicated that the lamb carcasses from<br />

Garzyn and Żołędnica flocks presented<br />

the highest level <strong>of</strong> water holding in meat<br />

in comparison to the other flocks. Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile indicated their<br />

best composition in mld muscle <strong>of</strong> malelambs<br />

from Dobrzyniewo flock, which<br />

was also confirmed e.g. by the level <strong>of</strong><br />

CLA fatty acids. Generally, the significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> flock on the fatty acids<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile was observed in all experimental<br />

animals, especially in the Dobrzyniewo<br />

flock. Due to obtained results, the carcasses<br />

could be highly evaluated in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> dietary quality in human nutrition,<br />

which was also reported by other authors<br />

(Gruszecki et al., 2004).<br />

In general, the effect <strong>of</strong> flock on the<br />

traits presented in Table 9 indicated that<br />

the largest animals <strong>of</strong> the most favorable<br />

fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>iles were bred in<br />

Dobrzyniewo. However the lambs <strong>of</strong><br />

the best meatiness level and the lowest<br />

fat content as well as <strong>of</strong> the best level<br />

<strong>of</strong> water holding capacity in mld muscle<br />

were observed in Garzyn flock. The most<br />

favorable tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg was<br />

presented in carcasses from Żołędnica<br />

and Żydowo. The APA’s sheep flocks<br />

produce the animals <strong>of</strong> high quality <strong>of</strong><br />

meat and slaughter characteristics, however<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> traits included in this<br />

study was very differentiated, which<br />

should be regarded as the effect <strong>of</strong> different<br />

environmental conditions specific<br />

to individual farms.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> EUROP classification on<br />

the chosen carcass traits were shown in


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 111<br />

TABLE 9. Effect <strong>of</strong> flock on examined slaughter traits (n = 75)<br />

Items<br />

Flock<br />

Dobrzyniewo (A) Lubiana (B) Garzyn (C) Żołędnica (D) Żydowo (E)<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />

Live body measurements (cm)<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> body 63.38 E 1.09 60.82 1.09 62.58 e 1.10 60.30 1.52 59.10 Ac 0.60<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank 9.22 0.19 9.25 e 0.19 8.84 0.19 9.49 e 0.26 8.80 bd 0.10<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head 19.10 0.39 19.62 d 0.39 19.94 D 0.39 17.91 bCE 0.54 19.95 D 0.22<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Pelt (kg) 2.77 BCE 0.13 3.69 Ae 0.13 3.54 A 0.13 3.21 0.19 3.36 Ab 0.07<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint (cm) 3.76 c.E 0.05 3.72 e 0.05 3.62 a 0.06 3.75 e 0.08 3.56 AeD 0.03<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 20.47 E 0.68 21.48 c 0.68 19.70 bE 0.68 21.10 0.95 22.72 AC 0.38<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 25.84 CDE 0.39 25.50 CDE 0.39 23.62 ABD 0.40 21.30 ABCE 0.55 23.13 ABD 0.22<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 41.05 BCDE 0.52 37.87 A 0.52 37.68 A 0.53 36.85 A 0.73 37.85 A 0.29<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) 13.64 Ce 0.64 13.59 Ce 0.64 15.63 a.B 0.64 15.15 0.89 15.36 ab 0.35<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) 3.18 b 0.14 2.81 aCE 0.14 3.40 B 0.14 3.28 0.19 3.25 B 0.08<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) 2.29 BCe 0.26 0.99 Ade 0.26 1.09 A 0.26 2.03 b 0.36 1.64 ab 0.14<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) 0.15 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.12 E 0.02 0.18 0.02 0.19 C 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%) 1.81 e 0.25 1.99 0.27 1.53 E 0.30 2.35 0.32 2.40 aC 0.20<br />

Foreshank (kg) 0.29 c 0.01 0.30 0.01 0.32 aE 0.01 0.29 0.02 0.27 C 0.01<br />

Foreshank (%) 3.48 C 0.19 3.85 0.21 4.12 AE 0.23 3.59 0.25 3.47 C 0.15<br />

Hideshank (kg) 0.36 0.01 0.33 C 0.01 0.38 BE 0.01 0.365 0.01 0.33 C 0.01<br />

Hideshank (%) 4.46 C 0.19 4.53 C 0.21 5.10 ABdE 0.23 4.35 c 0.25 4.38 C 0.15<br />

Middle neck (%) 5.70 bDE 0.36 6.51 a 0.40 6.07 d 0.44 7.46 c 0.47 6.82 A 0.29<br />

Breast (kg) 1.44 DE 0.04 1.35 d 0.04 1.41 D.E 0.05 1.16 AbC 0.06 1.25 AC 0.03<br />

Rib back (kg) 0.57 Cd 0.02 0.55 CD 0.02 0.65 AB 0.02 0.70 aBe 0.04 0.61 BD 0.01<br />

Rib back (%) 6.98 CDE 0.32 7.30 cD 0.36 8.10 Ab 0.39 9.01 ABe 0.42 7.94 Ad 0.26<br />

Leg (kg) 2.23 b 0.05 2.10 C 0.05 2.28 Be 0.05 2.16 0.08 2.13 c 0.03<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) 3.37 b 0.08 3.17 aC 0.08 3.49 BE 0.08 3.35 0.11 3.25 C 0.04<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) 40.49 C 0.67 41.23 C 0.75 43.67 ABE 0.81 41.82 0.88 41.33 C 0.54


112 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

Table 9. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Lean (kg) 1.57 c 0.05 1.52 C 0.05 1.71 aB 0.05 1.59 0.06 1.60 0.03<br />

Lean (%) 68.99 DE 1.28 70.04 dE 1.43 71.63 1.55 74.92 Ab 1.68 73.89 AB 1.03<br />

Fat (kg) 0.34 BCE 0.01 0.26 A 0.01 0.28 A 0.01 0.30 e 0.02 0.25 Ad 0.01<br />

Fat (%) 15.82 BCE 0.80 13.23 A 0.90 13.37 A 0.98 13.34 1.05 11.72 A 0.65<br />

Physical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 5.49 BcE 0.02 5.55 Ad 0.02 5.55 a 0.03 5.47 bE 0.03 5.56 AD 0.02<br />

Water holding capacity (cm 2 ) 34.19 CDe 3.06 34.20 Cde 3.48 19.18 ABe 3.87 19.59 Ab 3.74 27.37 abc 2.40<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat)<br />

C12:0 0.24 B 0.07 0.47 A.C 0.08 0.25 B 0.09 0.35 0.09 0.36 0.06<br />

C14:0 4.70 bC 0.43 5.75 aCDE 0.49 3.27 AB 0.54 3.31 B 0.52 3.96 B 0.34<br />

C15:0 0.62 0.08 0.71 C 0.09 0.43 B 0.10 0.48 0.10 0.56 0.06<br />

C15:1 0.24 b 0.02 0.29 aCDe 0.02 0.21 C 0.03 0.18 B 0.03 0.23 b 0.02<br />

C16:0 25.43 1.12 27.33 Cd 1.27 23.61 Be 1.41 22.86 be 1.36 26.47 cd 0.87<br />

C16:1 2.04 c 0.14 2.09 C 0.16 1.64 aB 0.18 2.04 0.18 1.88 0.11<br />

C18:0 14.18 Cde 0.94 14.93 c 1.07 16.97 Ab 1.19 17.61 d 1.15 16.37 e 0.74<br />

CLA 0.55 BCdE 0.04 0.41 A 0.05 0.35 A 0.05 0.38 a 0.05 0.39 A 0.03<br />

C20:3n3 0.10 Be 0.03 0.18 Ac 0.03 0.11 b 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.17 a 0.02<br />

C20:4n6 0.64 C 0.09 0.76 CE 0.10 0.27 ABe 0.11 0.47 0.11 0.48 Bc 0.07<br />

C20:5n3 0.11 Cde 0.01 0.09 A 0.01 0.06 AB 0.01 0.06 a 0.01 0.08 a 0.01<br />

SFA 46.62 b 1.64 50.74 aC 1.86 46.06 B 2.07 46.14 2.00 49.17 1.28<br />

PUFAn6 0.64 C 0.09 0.76 CE 0.10 0.27 ABe 0.11 0.47 0.11 0.48 Bc 0.07<br />

Statistical significance at: a,..., e <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A..., E <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 113<br />

Table 10. The highest weight <strong>of</strong> breast<br />

(%) as well as the lean content in leg (%)<br />

were found in carcasses <strong>of</strong> the class U.<br />

Also the high level <strong>of</strong> these traits were<br />

observed in class E, but these results<br />

were not statistically confirmed. By contrast,<br />

lamb carcasses qualified for the<br />

class O were characterized by the highest<br />

level <strong>of</strong> pH value and C17:0 fatty<br />

acid content as well as the lowest CLA<br />

content indicating the worst quality <strong>of</strong><br />

meat from lambs in this class, and thus<br />

confirming the need to improve the meat<br />

and slaughter traits by breeding work to<br />

eliminate this meatiness class in time.<br />

In turn, the fat class (Tab. 11) affected<br />

the weight <strong>of</strong> the shoulder (%) and<br />

C15:1 fatty acid content. The weight <strong>of</strong><br />

shoulder was the highest in the class <strong>of</strong><br />

the smallest fatness level, which also did<br />

not shown the C15:1 fatty acid at all. The<br />

content <strong>of</strong> this fatty acid was the highest<br />

in the class 2 and 4 in comparison to the<br />

class 3. These results lead to the conclusion<br />

that the C15:0 fatty acid appeared<br />

in the intramuscular fat in lamb meat <strong>of</strong><br />

higher fat category, while in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

very low fat level <strong>of</strong> this fatty acid may<br />

not be reported. Summing up the results<br />

summarized both in Tables 10 and 11 it<br />

should be pointed out that the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

EUROP classes and fat classes on the<br />

studied traits were negligible.<br />

Interesting results were observed<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> the interaction genotype ×<br />

flock (Tabs 5 and 6). This results confirmed<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> different conditions<br />

in individual sheep flocks on expressed<br />

level <strong>of</strong> studied traits in lamb groups<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> two different genotypes.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> genotype × flock interaction<br />

on carcass yield (%) was shown on<br />

Figure 1. Although the Żołędnica flock<br />

was represented only by the male-lambs<br />

TABLE 10. Effect <strong>of</strong> EUROP classes flock on examined slaughter traits (n = 75)<br />

EUROP classes (categories)<br />

Items<br />

E (A) U (B) R (C) O (D)<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Breast (%) 16.33 0.44 16.89 d 0.33 15.71 0.47 14.57 b 0.98<br />

Lean (%) in leg 72.42 1.11 74.28 Cd 0.82 70.71 B 1.18 68.82 2.46<br />

pH 24 5.51 bcd 0.02 5.50 acd 0.02 5.49 abd 0.02 5.62 abc 0.04<br />

C17:0 (g/100g <strong>of</strong> fat) 1.22 d 0.07 1.12 cD 0.05 1.25 bd 0.07 1.61 aBc 0.14<br />

CLA (g/100g <strong>of</strong> fat) 0.42 0.04 0.43 c 0.03 0.51 cd 0.04 0.33 c 0.08<br />

Statistical significance at: a,..., d <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., D <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

TABLE 11. Effect <strong>of</strong> fat classes flock on examined slaughter traits (n = 75)<br />

Fat class (categories)<br />

Cechy<br />

1 (A) 2 (B) 3 (C) 4 (D)<br />

LSM S E LSM S E LSM S E LSM S E<br />

Shoulder (%) 17.96 Bc 0.66 15.97 ACd 0.23 16.59 aB 0.24 16.83 d 0.39<br />

C15:1 (g/100g <strong>of</strong> fat) <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> 0.24 cd 0.02 0.21 bd 0.02 0.26 bc 0.02<br />

Statistical significance at: a,..., e <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A..., E <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


114 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

<strong>of</strong> F1-crosses with GMM, the dominating<br />

position <strong>of</strong> the F1-crosses over the<br />

pure PM lambs was observed, especially<br />

in Lubiana and then in Żydowo flock.<br />

The opposite tendency was observed in<br />

Dobrzyniewo and Garzyn flocks. Similar<br />

trends to these described above were<br />

observed due to the carcass weight (Fig.<br />

2). Accordingly to the weight <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

the F1-crosses dominated over the pure<br />

PM lambs in Lubiana as well as then<br />

in Żydowo and Garzyn flocks, whereas<br />

%<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

PM<br />

PM x GMM<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Dobrzyniewo Garzyn Lubiana odnica ydowo<br />

FIGURE 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> interaction genotype × flock (p ≤ 0.01) on carcass yield (%) in lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino (PM) and F-1 crosses <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino × German Mutton Merino (PM × GMM)<br />

Flock<br />

20<br />

kg<br />

18<br />

PM<br />

PM x GMM<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Dobrzyniewo Garzyn Lubiana odnica ydowo<br />

FIGURE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> interaction genotype × flock (p ≤ 0.01) on carcass weight (kg) in lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino (PM) and F-1 crosses <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino × German Mutton Merino (PM × GMM)<br />

Flock


Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 115<br />

2,4<br />

mm<br />

2,3<br />

PM<br />

PMxGMM<br />

2,2<br />

2,1<br />

2<br />

1,9<br />

1,8<br />

1,7<br />

Dobrzyniewo Garzyn Lubiana odnica ydowo<br />

FIGURE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> interaction genotype × flock (p ≤ 0.01) on leg weight (kg) in lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino (PM) and F-1 crosses <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino × German Mutton Merino (PM × GMM)<br />

Flock<br />

the opposite trend was observed in<br />

Dobrzyniewo flock (Fig. 3). In regards<br />

to the genotype × flock interaction the<br />

results indicated different reactions <strong>of</strong><br />

studied genotype groups within the individual<br />

flocks in case <strong>of</strong> production traits.<br />

These trends guided to the conclusion that<br />

sheep from Lubiana and Żydowo flocks<br />

should be kept in the genetic type consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> GMM, whereas the pure<br />

PM were much well adapted to the environmental<br />

conditions in Dobrzyniewo.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> Garzyn flock, the both genetic<br />

groups were possible to breed due to the<br />

similar results <strong>of</strong> the production traits. It<br />

was hard to recognize the proper direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> breeding work in the aim <strong>of</strong> meat<br />

traits improvement in Żołędnica flock<br />

due to the absence <strong>of</strong> the comparable<br />

PM group <strong>of</strong> lambs. Summing up, both<br />

the live body and carcass measurements<br />

as well as the analysis <strong>of</strong> slaughter traits<br />

indicated the high value <strong>of</strong> the lamb carcasses<br />

in all studied flocks. The Garzyn<br />

flock should be specially distinguished<br />

due to both the highest level <strong>of</strong> studied<br />

meat traits and content <strong>of</strong> valuable cuts<br />

as well as the lowest level <strong>of</strong> the fat content<br />

in carcasses.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The crossing <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino with<br />

German Mutton Merino did not affected<br />

the body growth development and body<br />

weights <strong>of</strong> lambs. However, some differences<br />

between flocks were observed,<br />

which indicated the necessity <strong>of</strong> improvement<br />

the lambs rearing conditions in<br />

both sexes, especially in Żydowo. The<br />

flock from Lubiana might be an example<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proper lambs’ rearing, which was<br />

confirmed by the best results obtained for<br />

that flock.<br />

The analyses <strong>of</strong> slaughter traits and<br />

carcass quality did not indicated the significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on the studied<br />

traits. Nevertheless, the significant dif-


116 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

ferences were found between flocks in<br />

the trade value, slaughter value, meat<br />

value and meat quality, which might be<br />

explained by the huge effect <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

factors on the studied traits.<br />

The interaction <strong>of</strong> genotype × environment<br />

analysis showed the significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> rearing and rising<br />

male-lambs with the genotype on the important<br />

production traits. This knowledge<br />

allowed to propose a proper way <strong>of</strong><br />

breeding improvement for each <strong>of</strong> Merino<br />

flocks <strong>of</strong> APA companies.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA.<br />

AOAC 1990: Association <strong>of</strong> Official Chemist.<br />

Food Composition Additives Natural Contaminants.<br />

GRUSZECKI T., JUNKUSZEW A., LIPECKA<br />

C., KAMIŃSKA A., SZYMANOWSKA A.,<br />

PATKOWSKI K., 2004: Fatty acids composition<br />

in sheep milk and muscle tissue <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

fed with protective fat-supplemented fodder.<br />

Arch. Tierz., Dummersdorf 47, Special Issue:<br />

183<strong>–</strong>188.<br />

NAWARA W., OSIKOWSKI M., KLUZ I., MO-<br />

DELSKA M., 1963: Wycena tryków na podstawie<br />

badania wartości potomstwa w stacjach<br />

oceny tryków Instytutu Zootechniki za rok<br />

1962. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1979: Próba charakterystyki<br />

budowy jagniąt w typie merynolinkolna<br />

w związku z użytkowością mięsną tej owcy.<br />

Zesz. Nauk. <strong>SGGW</strong>-AR. Zoot. 15: 25<strong>–</strong>40.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A., 2004:<br />

Program hodowli w spółkach Agencji Nieruchomości<br />

Rolnych na lata 2004<strong>–</strong>2015. Agencja<br />

Nieruchomości Rolnych, Zespół Nadzoru<br />

Właścicielskiego, Sekcja Zasobów Genetycznych<br />

i Hodowli.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN<br />

K., 1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym.<br />

Instytut Zootechniki Kraków. 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

PN-EN ISO 5508: Oleje I tłuszcze roślinne oraz<br />

zwierzęce. Analiza estrów metylowych kwasów<br />

tłuszczowych metodą chromatografii gazowej,<br />

1996.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

STRITTMATTER K., 2004: The fine wool Mutton<br />

Merino in Germany <strong>–</strong> currently breed condition<br />

and problems. Arch. Tierz. 47, Special<br />

issue, 25<strong>–</strong>35.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ krzyżowania maciorek merynosa<br />

polskiego z trykami rasy niemiecki merynos<br />

mięsny na tempo wzrostu i wartość mięsną<br />

ich potomstwa. Badania wykonano w stadach<br />

5 spółek Agencji Nieruchomości Rolnych położonych<br />

w województwach zachodnio-pomorskim<br />

i wielkopolskim. Badaniami objęto 1184 jagnięta<br />

obu płci, spośród których 75 tryczków poddano<br />

tuczowi i ocenie wzrostu, pomiarom przyżyciowym<br />

i ocenie poubojowej tusz i mięsa mld, rasy<br />

merynos polski (MP) oraz ich mieszańców F 1 po<br />

trykach rasy niemiecki merynos mięsny (MF).<br />

Kojarzenie merynosa polskiego z niemieckim<br />

merynosem mięsnym nie wpłynęło na wyniki<br />

tempa wzrostu i masy ciała jagniąt. Wykazano<br />

jednak różnice pomiędzy gospodarstwami, wskazując<br />

również na konieczność poprawy warunków<br />

utrzymania młodzieży obu płci, szczególnie<br />

w odniesieniu do stada w Żydowie. Przykładem<br />

prawidłowo prowadzonych działań w tym kierunku<br />

może być stado w Lubianej, które uzyskało<br />

najkorzystniejsze wyniki w tym zakresie. Analizy<br />

rzeźne oraz ocena jakości tusz nie wykazała<br />

znaczącego wpływu genotypu na badane cechy<br />

użytkowości mięsnej. Stwierdzono natomiast<br />

znaczące zróżnicowanie wartości handlowej, wartości<br />

rzeźnej, mięsnej i jakości mięsa występujące<br />

pomiędzy gospodarstwami, co świadczy o znaczącym<br />

wpływie czynników środowiskowych na<br />

oceniane cechy. Ocena oddziaływania interakcji<br />

genotyp środowisko wykazała również znaczące<br />

oddziaływanie miejsca chowu tryczków z genotypem,<br />

w zakresie ważnych cech produkcyjnych.<br />

Na tej podstawie można przyjąć kierunek dalszego<br />

doskonalenia poszczególnych stad merynosowych<br />

w gospodarstwach Spółek ANR.<br />

MS. received July 2010


Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Beata Kuczyńska<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Bydła<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 117


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 119<strong>–</strong>125<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance in flocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino<br />

sheep bred in five companies <strong>of</strong> the Polish Agricultural Property<br />

Agency<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

Abstract: Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance<br />

in fl ocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino sheep bred in five companies<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Polish Agricultural Property Agency.<br />

The research was carried out on the 5 sheep flocks<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Companies <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural Property<br />

Agency (APA), placed in Zachodniopomorskie<br />

and Wielkopolskie voivodeships. The experimental<br />

material consisted <strong>of</strong> 3701 ewes at age till<br />

13 years and 4987 lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino as well<br />

as 182 and 48 yearlings <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino and its<br />

F1-crosses with German Mutton Merino, respectively.<br />

The reproduction traits were investigated in<br />

all examined flocks. The prolificacy indicator was<br />

presented as it was given in the breed standards.<br />

The other reproduction parameters needs further<br />

improvement due to their low level. The results<br />

for the reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> both genetic groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> yearlings indicated relatively low genetic distance<br />

between them.<br />

Key words: sheep, Polish Merino, German Mutton<br />

Merino, reproduction.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Accordingly to the programme <strong>of</strong> sheep<br />

breeding for 5 Polish Merino (PM) sheep<br />

flocks <strong>of</strong> the Companies <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural<br />

Property Agency (APA) <strong>of</strong> Dobrzyniewo,<br />

Garzyn, Lubiana, Żołędnica<br />

and Żydowo, the group <strong>of</strong> pure German<br />

Mutton Merino (GMM) rams (n = 20) was<br />

imported from Germany (Niżnikowski,<br />

Oprządek, 2004). The meat performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> German Mutton Merino<br />

was widely described by Strittmatter<br />

(2004), therefore the import <strong>of</strong> its rams<br />

to sheep flocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino took<br />

place (Niżnikowski et al., 2005). Each<br />

<strong>of</strong> flocks obtained 4 GMM rams and the<br />

mating with Polish Merino started. The<br />

Ownership Supervision Group (APA)<br />

obtained the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the Polish<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Rural Development<br />

for the recording to the breeding<br />

books <strong>of</strong> the F1-crosses (50% <strong>of</strong> GMM).<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the GMM rams’ import was<br />

to decrease the inbreeding level in Polish<br />

Merino population, which was caused<br />

by low accessibility <strong>of</strong> PM rams in the<br />

national sheep population. The study was<br />

focused on the analysis <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> used mating schemes due to first,<br />

the reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> pure PM ewes<br />

as well as second, the PM yearling and<br />

their F-1 <strong>of</strong>fspring with GMM rams. The<br />

results were presented in tables and the<br />

proper comments were given.


120 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Reproduction performance analysis in<br />

five Polish Merino flocks in the APA<br />

Companies. The research was carried<br />

out on the 5 sheep flocks <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino the Companies <strong>of</strong> The Agricultural<br />

Property Agency (APA), placed<br />

in zachodnio-pomorskie (n = 1) and<br />

wielkopolskie (n = 4) voivodeships. The<br />

experimental material was the sheep<br />

population bred in 2000<strong>–</strong>2006 at age <strong>of</strong><br />

1<strong>–</strong>13 years. Both ewes and lambs were<br />

born as singles, twins or triplets. The<br />

animals were kept in building during<br />

whole year and fed accordingly to the<br />

norms (Osikowski et al., 1993). The<br />

mating season was conducted in the<br />

period <strong>of</strong> March-May (excluding the<br />

flock in Żołędnica, where the sheep were<br />

prepared for Autumn mating season).<br />

Basing on the breeding books the data <strong>of</strong><br />

litter size, lambs’ survivability till 7 th day<br />

and rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs they were collected.<br />

The data <strong>of</strong> particular reproduction traits<br />

were estimated due to the Petersson<br />

and Danell method (1985). In case <strong>of</strong><br />

the lambs’ survivability till 7 th day and<br />

rearing indicator the LSM model was<br />

used to estimate the effects <strong>of</strong> flock, year,<br />

lambing number, type <strong>of</strong> birth and sex as<br />

well as the double-factor (flock × year,<br />

flock × lambing number, year × lambing<br />

number, flock × sex) and triple-factor<br />

(flock × year × lambing number and<br />

flock × year × sex) factor interactions.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> litter size, the effects <strong>of</strong> type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth and sex as well as the interaction<br />

(type <strong>of</strong> birth × sex) were excluded<br />

from the statistical model. The statistical<br />

calculations were done with the LSM<br />

method in SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware (v.12.0, Anon.<br />

2004) and the effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors<br />

were estimated with the F-test. The data<br />

used in calculations were obtained from<br />

the information gathered from the particular<br />

flock books. The Duncan test was<br />

used to estimate the differences between<br />

flocks, litter size and sex in all examined<br />

traits (Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

Reproduction performance analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

yearlings <strong>of</strong> pure Polish Merino and<br />

its F-1 <strong>of</strong>fspring gained in one-step<br />

crossing with German Mutton Merino.<br />

The data concerning these traits were<br />

possible to obtain only from 4 flocks due<br />

to the different time <strong>of</strong> mating season in<br />

Żołędnica. The analysis <strong>of</strong> fertility and<br />

prolificacy <strong>of</strong> yearling was calculated<br />

with the LSM model, which included the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> flock and genotype as well as<br />

the interaction (flock × genotype). The<br />

calculation was done due to the method<br />

described in the previous paragraph.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Reproduction performance analysis in<br />

five Polish Merino flocks. The results<br />

were presented in Tables 1<strong>–</strong>3. The effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions<br />

on examined reproduction traits were<br />

presented in Table 1. The average fertility<br />

indicator presented typical value for<br />

this breed. The other indicators were<br />

presented at too low levels than they<br />

were expected, and this observation<br />

needs further experiments to recognize<br />

the range and reasons <strong>of</strong> such situation.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

sources (excluding flock) on the examined<br />

traits may be recognized as the<br />

typical. However, the effect <strong>of</strong> flock on<br />

reproduction traits was shown in Table 2.<br />

The highest level <strong>of</strong> fertility was observed<br />

in the flock in Garzyn (0.91)


Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance in fl ocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 121<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on the reproduction parameters <strong>of</strong> Merino sheep<br />

in flocks <strong>of</strong> the APA Companies in 2000<strong>–</strong>2006<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Double-factors interactions<br />

Triple-factors<br />

interactions<br />

Statistics<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

flock<br />

year<br />

lambing no<br />

litter size<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

flock *<br />

year<br />

flock *<br />

lambing no.<br />

year *<br />

lambing no.<br />

flock*<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

flock *<br />

year *<br />

lambing no.<br />

flock *<br />

year *<br />

sex <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

Fertility<br />

(heads) XX XX XX <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX XX XX <strong>–</strong> XX <strong>–</strong> 3407 0.81 0.01<br />

Prolificacy<br />

(heads/<br />

/lambing) X XX XX <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX NS NS <strong>–</strong> NS <strong>–</strong> 3701 1.35 0.01<br />

Survivability<br />

till 7 day <strong>of</strong><br />

life<br />

(heads) XX NS XX XX XX XX <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> X <strong>–</strong> XX 4987 0.90 0.02<br />

Lambs’<br />

rearing<br />

(heads) XX XX XX XX XX XX <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> X <strong>–</strong> NS 4987 0.83 0.03<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant; “<strong>–</strong>“ <strong>–</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> data<br />

n<br />

x<br />

S<br />

TABLE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> flock on the reproduction parameters <strong>of</strong> Merino sheep in flocks <strong>of</strong> the APA<br />

Companies in 2000<strong>–</strong>2006<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

Dobrzyniewo<br />

(A)<br />

Lubiana<br />

(B)<br />

Sheep flocks<br />

Garzyn<br />

(C)<br />

Żołędnica<br />

(D)<br />

Żydowo<br />

(E)<br />

n 895 1355 367 790<br />

Fertility<br />

LSM 0.77 0.91 0.64 0.86<br />

(heads)<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02<br />

* CDE ADe ACE AcD<br />

n 789 1354 1259 299 706<br />

Prolificacy LSM 1.32 1.42 1.30 1.39 1.33<br />

(heads/lambing) SE 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.03<br />

* B ACe Bd c b<br />

n 1039 1924 1615 409 942<br />

Survivability LSM 0.86 0.91 0.88 0.96 0.91<br />

(heads)<br />

SE 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02<br />

* bDE aD DE AbcE ACD<br />

LSM 0.76 0.83 0.81 0.92 0.84<br />

Lambs’ rearing<br />

SE 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03<br />

(heads)<br />

* BCDE AD ADe ABCE AcD<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a,..., e <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., E <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


122 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> litter size and sex <strong>of</strong> lambs on their survivability and rearing <strong>of</strong> Merino lambs bred<br />

in flocks <strong>of</strong> the APA Companies in 2000<strong>–</strong>2006<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

Survivability<br />

till 7 day <strong>of</strong> life<br />

(heads)<br />

Lambs’ rearing<br />

(heads)<br />

singles<br />

(A)<br />

Litter size<br />

twins<br />

(B)<br />

triplets<br />

(C)<br />

males<br />

Sex<br />

females<br />

Statistical<br />

differences #<br />

n 2831 3035 63 3048 2881<br />

LSM 0.93 0.95 0.83 0.89 0.92 **<br />

SE 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02<br />

* BC AC BC<br />

LSM 0.88 0.90 0.72 0.81 0.85 **<br />

SE 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03<br />

* aC bC AB<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a,..., c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

#<br />

<strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: ** <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

comparing to the other flocks. The<br />

flock in Garzyn presented the fertility<br />

indicator over 0.9 <strong>of</strong> lambed ewe and<br />

this result was compatible to the breed<br />

standards for Polish Merino. This result<br />

indicated the improvement <strong>of</strong> the fertility<br />

to the satisfying level in the Garzyn<br />

flock comparing to the previous studies<br />

which presented definitely lower values<br />

<strong>of</strong> this trait (Niżnikowski et al., 2005).<br />

Due to the prolificacy indicator, the<br />

highest values <strong>of</strong> this traits were obtained<br />

in Lubiana flock (p ≤ 0.01) comparing<br />

to the other sheep flocks. Very close<br />

results were obtained in Żołędnica flock,<br />

where the ewes were mated in Autumn<br />

months. Also the survivability <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

till 7th day presented the highest values<br />

in Żołędnica flock, being compatible to<br />

the breed standards for Polish Merino.<br />

Unfortunately the rearing indicator did<br />

not suited to the breed standards in all<br />

examined flocks.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

and sex on survivability <strong>of</strong> lambs till 7th<br />

day as well as the lambs’ rearing indicator<br />

pointed out the tendencies compatible<br />

to the expected ones. The highest values<br />

were obtained in twins and the lowest<br />

<strong>–</strong> in triplets as well as the statistically<br />

approved (p ≤ 0.01) supremacy <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

ewes over the lamb rams at high statistic<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 2005).<br />

The age <strong>of</strong> ewes (lambing number)<br />

affected the reproduction traits in different<br />

ways. The analysis <strong>of</strong> Figures 1 and<br />

2 indicated that ewes lambed 7 time and<br />

more should not be used in reproduction<br />

in the flocks <strong>of</strong> the APA Companies.<br />

The Polish Merino breed presented<br />

sufficiently good results due to the fertility<br />

level, whereas the other indicators<br />

(excluding the prolificacy in the<br />

Garzyn flock and lambs survivability in<br />

Żołędnica) should be studied further to<br />

recognize the reasons <strong>of</strong> such low reproduction<br />

level, completely. The possible<br />

reasons should be searched for among<br />

the environmental conditions (as care,<br />

prevention or feeding) and perhaps this<br />

could be the effects <strong>of</strong> high inbreeding<br />

level or the time <strong>of</strong> mating season. This<br />

hypotheses needed to be researched<br />

further.


Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance in fl ocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 123<br />

1,6<br />

Prolificacy Fertility<br />

1,5<br />

1,4<br />

1,3<br />

1,2<br />

1,1<br />

%<br />

1<br />

0,9<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

Lambing no<br />

FIGURE 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> lambing number on prolificacy and fertility <strong>of</strong> ewes (P ≤ 0.01)<br />

1,00<br />

0,95<br />

Survivability<br />

Lamb's rearing<br />

0,90<br />

%<br />

0,85<br />

0,80<br />

0,75<br />

0,70<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

Lambing no<br />

FIGURE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> lambing number on survivability and rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs (P ≤ 0.01)<br />

Reproduction performance analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

yearlings <strong>of</strong> pure Polish Merino and its<br />

F-1 <strong>of</strong>fspring gained in one-step crossing<br />

with German Mutton Merino. The<br />

results were shown in Tables 4 and 5.<br />

No statistically significant effects <strong>of</strong> examined<br />

factors on the yearlings fertility<br />

were observed apart the effect <strong>of</strong> flock<br />

(p ≤ 0.01) (Tab. 4). It was important to<br />

observe that the lack <strong>of</strong> genotype effect<br />

on the studied traits leads to conclusion,<br />

that the crossing with German Mutton<br />

Merino did not affected the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction traits in the F-1 <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />

Similar tendency to that shown in Table<br />

2 might be observed due to the prolificacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> yearlings (Tab. 5) and again the<br />

Garzyn flock had a higher position than<br />

the other flocks. The prolificacy level was<br />

the lowest in Lubiana flock (p ≤ 0.01)<br />

indicating unfortunately the declining<br />

trend comparing to the previous studies<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 2005), which reported<br />

the higher results.


124 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 4. Effect <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> yearlings in 2007<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Interaction<br />

flock genotype flock * genotype<br />

n X S<br />

Fertility (heads) XX NS NS 230 0.79 0.03<br />

Prolificacy (heads/lambing) NS NS NS 179 1.34 0.04<br />

Statistical significance at: XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

TABLE 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> flock on reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> yearlings in 2007<br />

Indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

Dobrzyniewo<br />

(A)<br />

Sheep flock<br />

Lubiana<br />

(B)<br />

Garzyn<br />

(C)<br />

Żydowo<br />

(D)<br />

n 34 100 52 44<br />

Fertility<br />

LSM 0.87 0.65 0.99 0.68<br />

(heads)<br />

SE 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07<br />

* B aC BD C<br />

n 30 65 51 33<br />

Prolificacy<br />

LSM 1.50 1.17 1.32 1.40<br />

(heads/lambing)<br />

SE 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.10<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a,..., d <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; A,..., D <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The prolificacy indicator was compatible<br />

to the values listed in the breed standards<br />

for all Polish Merino flocks. The other<br />

reproduction parameters needed further<br />

improvement due to their low level<br />

by the improvement <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

breeding conditions (more careful preparation<br />

for mating season to increase the<br />

fertility level <strong>of</strong> ewes as well as better<br />

breeding and rearing conditions <strong>of</strong> ewes<br />

and lambs).<br />

No statistically significant differences<br />

between both genetic groups <strong>of</strong> yearlings<br />

(pure PM and F-1 crosses with GMM)<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> the reproduction traits indicated<br />

relatively small genetic distance<br />

between them. Therefore the use <strong>of</strong><br />

German Mutton Merino breed in crossing<br />

schemes could help to decrease the<br />

inbreeding level in flocks and between<br />

flocks in the national population <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Merino.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA 2004.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A., 2004:<br />

Program hodowli Owiec w Spółkach Agencji<br />

Nieruchomości Rolnych na lata 2004<strong>–</strong>2015.<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych, Zespół Nadzoru<br />

Właścicielskiego, Sekcja Zasobów Genetycznych<br />

Hodowli, Warszawa, 1<strong>–</strong>51.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A., POPIE-<br />

LARCZYK D., STRZELEC E., GROBEREK<br />

J., 2005: Wielkość miotu i wskaźniki odchowu<br />

jagniąt u owiec rasy merynos polski utrzymywanych<br />

w stadach należących do Agencji Nieruchomości<br />

Rolnych. Rocz. Nauk Zoot., z. 21,<br />

Suplement, 19<strong>–</strong>22.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN<br />

K., 1993: Normy Żywienia Owiec. [w:] Normy<br />

Żywienia Bydła i Owiec Systemem Trady-


Analysis <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance in fl ocks <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino... 125<br />

cyjnym, Ryś R. (red.). Instytut Zootechniki,<br />

Kraków, p. 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

PETERSSON C.J., DANELL O., 1985: Factors<br />

Influencing Lamb Survival in Four Swedish<br />

Sheep Breeds. Acta Agric. Scand. 35, 217<strong>–</strong>232.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

STRITTMATTER K., 2004: The fine wool Mutton<br />

Merino in Germany <strong>–</strong> currently breed condition<br />

and problems. Arch. Tierz. 47, Special<br />

issue, 25<strong>–</strong>35.<br />

Streszczenie: Analiza wskaźników rozrodu w stadach<br />

owiec rasy merynos polski utrzymywanych<br />

w Spółkach Agencji Nieruchomości Rolnych. Badania<br />

wykonano w stadach 5 spółek Agencji Nieruchomości<br />

Rolnych położonych w województwach<br />

zachodnio-pomorskim i wielkopolskim.<br />

Badaniami objęto 3701 maciorek znajdujących<br />

się w wieku do 13 lat, 4987 jagniąt rasy merynos<br />

polski oraz 182 przystępki rasy merynos polski<br />

i 48 ich mieszańców F 1 po trykach rasy niemiecki<br />

merynos mięsny. Ocenie poddano wskaźniki rozrodu<br />

określane w tych stadach. W we wszystkich<br />

stadach wykazano zgodny ze wzorcem rasowym<br />

poziom wskaźnika plenności. Pozostałe wskaźniki<br />

rozrodu wymagają poprawy warunków utrzymania<br />

zwierząt celem ich udoskonalenia. W zakresie<br />

wskaźników rozrodu przystępek uzyskanych<br />

z kojarzenia maciorek merynosowych z trykami<br />

niemieckiego merynosa mięsnego nie wykazano<br />

różnic z rówieśnicami rasy merynos polski, co<br />

wskazuje na stosunkowo niewielki dystans genetyczny<br />

tej rasy w porównaniu do owiec tego typu<br />

utrzymywanych w Polsce. Wykorzystanie owiec<br />

rasy niemiecki merynos mięsny potwierdza w ten<br />

sposób ich celowość wprowadzenia do krajowego<br />

pogłowia owiec tej rasy celem konieczności<br />

zmniejszenia spokrewnienia pomiędzy owcami<br />

i stadami.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 127<strong>–</strong>134<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher<br />

bred in Poland<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1 , BEATA KUCZYŃSKA 3<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

3<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong><br />

lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher bred in Poland. The<br />

research was carried out on male and female<br />

lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher sheep breed. The animals<br />

were fed due to the norms. When the lambs<br />

achieved the slaughter weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg (±1.5 kg),<br />

the body measurements at live animals were collected<br />

and then the slaughter characteristics on<br />

slaughtered lambs were investigated: slaughter<br />

value, subjective carcass evaluation, carcass<br />

measurements, cuts composition, tissue characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> leg, physical and chemical composition<br />

as well as the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> mld muscle.<br />

The results indicated similar slaughter value as<br />

well as meat and carcass quality <strong>of</strong> female and<br />

male lambs. The female lambs achieved superiority<br />

over male lambs in subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

colour and consistency <strong>of</strong> fat, which was whiter<br />

and more cohesive in female lambs. Generally,<br />

the evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass quality and slaughter<br />

value <strong>of</strong> both sexes <strong>of</strong> lambs showed their usability<br />

to producing the high-quality carcasses for the<br />

national market and for export.<br />

Key words: sheep, Berrichon du Cher, carcass<br />

quality, slaughter value.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Berrichon du Cher is a sheep breed<br />

used in Poland to multi-breed crosses<br />

with national maternal sheep breeds in the<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> improving the slaughter quality <strong>of</strong><br />

meat lambs (Jagiełło, 2001; Niżnikowski,<br />

1995; Niżnikowski et al., 1998, 2001).<br />

A small number <strong>of</strong> scientific papers<br />

describing the slaughter value and meat<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the Berrichone du Cher lambs<br />

is reported so far in Poland, but it could<br />

be useful to compare the real slaughter<br />

value with the effects obtained in their<br />

multi-breed crosses. Due to this fact, the<br />

study presents the evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass<br />

quality based on the EUROP classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcasses as well as the slaughter<br />

value and meat quality according to the<br />

sex in lambs fattened till 35 kg <strong>of</strong> live<br />

body weight. Obtained results were<br />

discussed and presented in Tables.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The research was carried out in 2008 in<br />

sheep flock kept by The Company <strong>of</strong><br />

Agricultural Property Agency (APA) in<br />

Żydowo (wielkopolskie voivodeship). The<br />

research material contained the group <strong>of</strong><br />

male and female lambs (10 and 7 heads,<br />

respectively). The animals were kept in<br />

solid buildings and fed accordingly to the<br />

feeding standards for sheep (Osikowski<br />

et al., 1993), with the own-made fodders<br />

(silage, herbage, hay and concentrate).


128 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

When the lambs achieved the slaughter<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg (±1.5 kg), the body<br />

measurements at live animals were collected<br />

regarding: length and round <strong>of</strong><br />

foreshrank, height in withers, length <strong>of</strong><br />

body, spread and depth <strong>of</strong> chest, length<br />

and spread <strong>of</strong> head (Niżnikowski, 1979).<br />

Then the lambs were slaughtered and the<br />

carcasses were chilled in 4ºC throughout<br />

24 hours. The following items were<br />

estimated:<br />

I. Slaughter traits: age at slaughter,<br />

gross dressing percentage, weight <strong>of</strong><br />

carcass and weight <strong>of</strong> skin (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963);<br />

II. Carcass quality due to the EUROP<br />

classification: conformation class<br />

(E, U, R, O, P), fat class (1- the lowest<br />

fat content, 2, 3, 4, 5-the highest fat<br />

content), fat consistency (very cohesive,<br />

cohesive, tender, very tender)<br />

and fat colour (white or coloured).<br />

III. Carcass measurements: length and<br />

round <strong>of</strong> foreshrank (Niżnikowski,<br />

1979), spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint, depth <strong>of</strong><br />

leg, length <strong>of</strong> leg, round <strong>of</strong> leg, leg<br />

index (round <strong>of</strong> leg/ length <strong>of</strong> leg ×<br />

100), loin eye area, fat cover over<br />

loin eye (Nawara et al., 1963);<br />

IV. Carcass cuts composition (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963): kidney with fat, both<br />

shanks (front and hind), shoulder,<br />

neck, middle neck, rib back, loin, leg,<br />

breast and the valuable cuts (leg, rib<br />

back, loin and tenderloin);<br />

V. Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg: lean,<br />

bone and fat (Nawara et al., 1963);<br />

VI. Physical and chemical characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle: the pH-24 value<br />

as well as the water, protein, fat and<br />

dry matter content (AOAC, 1990);<br />

VII. Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the intramuscular<br />

fat <strong>of</strong> mld muscle. The fat extraction<br />

was prepared due to the Röse-<br />

-Gottlieb method (AOAC, 1990).<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile composition was<br />

determined with the gas chromatography<br />

due to the norms PN-EN ISO<br />

5508 (1996).<br />

Statistical calculations were done<br />

using the LSM analysis in the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

for Windows v. 12.0 (Anon., 2004)<br />

estimating the effects <strong>of</strong>: type <strong>of</strong> birth and<br />

sex. Moreover, the regression on body<br />

weight at slaughter day was applied.<br />

When the effect <strong>of</strong> sex on the researched<br />

traits was observed, the significance <strong>of</strong><br />

the differences between factor levels<br />

were checked out with F-test (Ruszczyc,<br />

1981). The results are shown in Tables.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> sex and type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong><br />

lambs on examined traits were gathered in<br />

Tables 1, 2 and 3. Generally, the statistically<br />

approved (p < 0.01) effect <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth on spread <strong>of</strong> head (Tab. 1), weight<br />

and content <strong>of</strong> bone tissue (Tab. 2) as well<br />

as C22:5n3 fatty acid content (Tab. 3) was<br />

reported. The sex <strong>of</strong> lambs statistically<br />

affected following traits: the fat cover over<br />

loin (Tab. 1), weight and content <strong>of</strong> neck<br />

and the weight <strong>of</strong> bones in the dissected<br />

leg (Tab. 2) as well as the C18:1c9 fatty<br />

acid content (Tab. 3). The layout <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

accordingly to the effect <strong>of</strong> lambs’<br />

birth type is in conformity with the results<br />

reported in other studies (Gruszecki et<br />

al., 2004; Jagiełło, 2001; Niżnikowski,<br />

1995; Niżnikowski et al., 1998; 2001),<br />

whereas the effect <strong>of</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> lambs was<br />

a bit different from these results, especially<br />

in relatively small number <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

which should be observed in growing<br />

lambs due to their sex. In this respect,


Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher... 129<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on live body and carcass measurements (n = 17)<br />

Items<br />

Live body measurements (cm)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

Height in withers NS NS 56.49 1.41<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> body NS NS 60.93 0.87<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> chest NS NS 19.69 1.04<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> chest NS NS 24.80 0.45<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS NS 10.82 0.30<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank NS NS 7.95 0.27<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head NS NS 17.67 0.50<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head X NS 9.81 0.35<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening NS NS 205.42 8.38<br />

Slaughter yield (%) NS NS 41.41 1.25<br />

Pelt (kg) NS NS 2.93 0.20<br />

Carcass (kg) NS NS 14.47 0.45<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint (cm) NS NS 3.58 0.11<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS 24.79 1.15<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS 24.09 0.63<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS 37.82 0.37<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%) NS NS 160.66 4.68<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) NS NS 5.31 0.19<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) NS NS 2.92 0.17<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) NS NS 13.97 0.64<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) NS X 1.82 0.33<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

sex<br />

X<br />

S<br />

TABLE . Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on carcass cuts comosition and tissue characteristic <strong>of</strong> le<br />

(n = 17)<br />

Items<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth sex<br />

X<br />

S<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Half-carcass (kg) NS NS 7.29 0.29<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) NS NS 0.21 0.03<br />

Kidney with fat (%) NS NS 2.80 0.33<br />

Foreshank (kg) NS NS 0.27 0.02<br />

Foreshank (%) NS NS 3.60 0.24<br />

Hideshank (kg) NS NS 0.33 0.02<br />

Hideshank (%) NS NS 4.48 0.33<br />

Neck (kg) NS XX 0.44 0.03<br />

Neck (%) NS X 6.10 0.51


130 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

Table 2. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Middle neck (kg) NS NS 0.43 0.02<br />

Middle neck (%) NS NS 5.65 0.31<br />

Shoulder (kg) NS NS 1.37 0.06<br />

Shoulder (%) NS NS 18.52 0.77<br />

Breast (kg) NS NS 1.17 0.17<br />

Breast (%) NS NS 15.67 1.85<br />

Rib back (kg) NS NS 0.51 0.05<br />

Rib back (%) NS NS 6.94 0.42<br />

Loin (kg) NS NS 0.41 0.03<br />

Loin (%) NS NS 5.61 0.29<br />

Tenderloin (kg) NS NS 0.12 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%) NS NS 1.65 0.14<br />

Leg (kg) NS NS 1.93 0.07<br />

Leg (%) NS NS 26.71 0.90<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS NS 2.85 0.12<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS NS 39.26 0.96<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Lean (kg) NS NS 1.46 0.07<br />

Lean (%) NS NS 75.35 1.55<br />

Fat (kg) NS NS 0.24 0.02<br />

Fat (%) NS NS 12.94 0.92<br />

Bone (kg) XX X 0.30 0.01<br />

Bone (%) X NS 15.13 0.60<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

TABLE 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on physical and chemical quality traits as well as<br />

the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> mld muscle in lambs (n = 17)<br />

Items<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth sex<br />

X<br />

S<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Physical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 NS NS 5.72 0.06<br />

Water holding capacity (cm 2 ) NS NS 18.46 6.42<br />

Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle (%)<br />

Dry matter NS NS 26.91 2.08<br />

Crude protein NS NS 20.57 0.28<br />

Fat NS NS 2.12 0.39<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat):<br />

C10:0 NS NS 0.19 0.02<br />

C12:0 NS NS 0.13 0.05<br />

C14:0 NS NS 2.26 0.41<br />

C14:1 NS NS 0.15 0.01


Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher... 131<br />

Table 3. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

C15:0 NS NS 0.39 0.05<br />

C15:1 NS NS 0.20 0.03<br />

C16:0 NS NS 23.19 0.84<br />

C16:1 NS NS 1.50 0.09<br />

C17:0 NS NS 1.21 0.08<br />

C17:1 NS NS 0.62 0.06<br />

C18:0 NS NS 20.68 0.60<br />

C18:1c9 NS X 36.06 0.96<br />

C18:2n6 NS NS 3.35 0.30<br />

C18:3n3 NS NS 0.15 0.01<br />

C18:3n3 NS NS 0.35 0.04<br />

CLA NS NS 0.40 0.04<br />

C20:1 NS NS 0.17 0.02<br />

C20:3n3 NS NS 0.18 0.02<br />

C20:4n6 NS NS 0.97 0.13<br />

C20:5n3 NS NS 0.10 0.05<br />

C22:5n3 X NS 0.19 0.02<br />

C22:6n3 NS NS 0.03 0.00<br />

SFA NS NS 48.05 1.28<br />

MUFA-CIS NS NS 42.59 0.98<br />

MUFA-TRANS NS NS 3.41 0.55<br />

PUFAn3 NS NS 0.49 0.07<br />

PUFAn6 NS NS 0.97 0.13<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

the own studies reported that the sexual<br />

dimorphism did not appeared clearly in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> examined slaughter traits, what is<br />

typical for the meat sheep breeds.<br />

The subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the carcass<br />

quality based on the meat and fat classifications<br />

as well as the colour and consistency<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat was presented in Table 4. The<br />

meatiness evaluation due to the EUROP<br />

classification indicated similar values in<br />

lambs <strong>of</strong> both sexes. Moreover, the high<br />

number <strong>of</strong> E-class carcasses was observed<br />

both in male and female lambs. Similar<br />

results were obtained due to the fat classifications<br />

and all carcasses were classified<br />

to the 2- and 3-class, which are the most<br />

demanded in the lamb meat market. In<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> colour and consistency <strong>of</strong> fat, the<br />

carcasses from female lambs were scored<br />

higher than the male ones. More carcasses<br />

from female lambs were covered with<br />

white fat as well as the fat was observed<br />

to be cohesive and very cohesive. In this<br />

case, the female carcasses obtained more<br />

favorable evaluation in comparison to the<br />

male carcasses.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> traits affected by the sex<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs were gathered in Table 5. The<br />

results showed that male lambs indicated<br />

the lower fat cover over the loin <strong>of</strong> eye<br />

(p ≤ 0.05), higher neck weight and content<br />

(p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01) as well as the lower<br />

bone weight in the leg (p ≤ 0.05) in contrary<br />

to female lambs. In case <strong>of</strong> the C18:1c9


132 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 4. Subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass quality due to the sex <strong>of</strong> lambs (n = 17)<br />

Sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

Items<br />

male female male female<br />

(%) (heads)<br />

EUROP class (categories):<br />

E 80.00 71.43 8 5<br />

U 20.00 28.57 2 2<br />

R 0 0 0 0<br />

O 0 0 0 0<br />

P 0 0 0 0<br />

Fat class (categories):<br />

1 0 0 0 0<br />

2 50.00 42.86 5 3<br />

3 50.00 57.14 5 4<br />

4 0 0 0 0<br />

5 0 0 0 0<br />

Fat colour:<br />

Coloured 60.00 28.57 6 2<br />

White 40.00 71.43 4 5<br />

Fat consistency:<br />

Very cohesive 50.00 28.57 5 2<br />

Cohesive 30.00 71.43 3 5<br />

Tender 20.00 0 2 0<br />

Very tender 0 0 0 0<br />

TABLE 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on chosen meat quality traits in Berrichon du Cher lambs (n = 17)<br />

Sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

Items:<br />

female<br />

male Significance<br />

n 7 10 <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Fat cover over the loin eye (mm) 2.50 0.54 1.14 0.24 *<br />

Carcass cuts<br />

Neck weight (kg) 0.36 0.05 0.52 0.02 **<br />

Neck content (%) 5.15 0.79 7.04 0.40 *<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Bone weight (kg) 0.32 0.01 0.29 0.01 *<br />

Bone content (%) 16.02 0.93 14.25 0.47<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat):<br />

C18:1c9 37.63 1.50 34.48 0.75 *<br />

Statistical significance at * <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; ** <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01


Effect <strong>of</strong> sex on slaughter value <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher... 133<br />

fatty acid content the higher values were<br />

observed in female lambs. Discussing<br />

the results gathered in the Table 5, the<br />

sporadic character <strong>of</strong> the appeared differences<br />

within only a few traits among<br />

the vast range <strong>of</strong> the evaluated traits was<br />

observed.<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> the slaughter value as well<br />

as carcass and meat quality, the female and<br />

male lambs presented similar results, what<br />

is typical for meat sheep breeds in contrary<br />

to the sheep breeds <strong>of</strong> other production<br />

types (Gruszecki et al., 2004; Jagiełło,<br />

2001; Niżnikowski, 1995; Niżnikowski<br />

et al., 1998, 2001). Only the fact <strong>of</strong> favorable<br />

fat colour and consistency in female<br />

lambs should be emphasized indicating<br />

their possibly better tradability on the<br />

market, what needs to be approved on the<br />

larger number <strong>of</strong> experimental material.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Based on the obtained results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

slaughter value, carcass and meat quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> female and male lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du<br />

Cher sheep breed slaughtered at 35 kg <strong>of</strong><br />

body weight can be identified as follows:<br />

1. The similar slaughter value as well as<br />

meat and carcass quality <strong>of</strong> female and<br />

male lambs was observed.<br />

2. The female lambs achieved superiority<br />

over male lambs in subjective evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> colour and consistency <strong>of</strong> fat,<br />

which were whiter and more cohesive<br />

in female lambs. This tendency needs<br />

to be approved on the larger number <strong>of</strong><br />

animals.<br />

3. Generally, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass<br />

quality and slaughter value <strong>of</strong> both<br />

sexes <strong>of</strong> lambs showed their usability<br />

to producing the high-quality carcasses<br />

for the national market and for export.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA .<br />

AOAC, 1990: Association <strong>of</strong> Official Chemist.<br />

Food Composition Additives Natural Contaminants.<br />

GRUSZECKI T., JUNKUSZEW A., LIPECKA<br />

C., KAMIŃSKA A., SZYMANOWSKA A.,<br />

PATKOWSKI K., 2004: Fatty acids composition<br />

in sheep milk and muscle tissue <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

fed with protective fat-supplemented fodder.<br />

Arch. Tierz., Dummersdorf 47, Special Issue:<br />

183<strong>–</strong>188.<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 2001: Wybrane aspekty produkcji<br />

jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

zlokalizowanego na glebach lekkich, Rozprawa<br />

doktorska wykonana w Zakładzie Hodowli<br />

Owiec i Kóz <strong>SGGW</strong> w Warszawie (maszynopis).<br />

NAWARA W., OSIKOWSKI M., KLUZ I., MO-<br />

DELSKA M., 1963: Wycena tryków na podstawie<br />

badania wartości potomstwa w stacjach<br />

oceny tryków Instytutu Zootechniki za rok<br />

1962. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1979: Próba charakterystyki<br />

budowy jagniąt w typie merynolinkolna<br />

w związku z użytkowością mięsną tej owcy.<br />

Zesz. Nauk. <strong>SGGW</strong>-AR. Zoot. 15: 25<strong>–</strong>40.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1995: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 55547 92/C/569 pt.:<br />

„Intensyfikacja produkcji oraz poprawa jakości<br />

tusz jagnięcych owiec nizinnych hodowanych<br />

w Polsce Centralnej”, Komitet Badań Naukowych,<br />

Warszawa (maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., GLIŃSKI M.,<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 1998: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 5 P06E 001 95C/2470 pt.:<br />

„Produkcja jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

rolniczego położonego na glebach<br />

lekkich”, Komitet Badań Naukowych, Warszawa<br />

(maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., JAGIEŁŁO M.,<br />

GLIŃSKI M., 2001: Tempo wzrostu i wartość<br />

rzeźna jagniąt mieszańców rasy berrichon<br />

z wrzosówką i owcą żelaźnieńską. Pr. i Mater.<br />

Zoot. 58, 115<strong>–</strong>124.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN<br />

K., 1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym.<br />

Instytut Zootechniki Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.


134 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

PN-EN ISO 5508, 1996: Oleje i tłuszcze roślinne<br />

oraz zwierzęce. Analiza estrów metylowych<br />

kwasów tłuszczowych metodą chromatografii<br />

gazowej.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

Streszczenie: Wartość rzeźna jagniąt rasy mięsnej<br />

berrichon du cher w zależności od płci, pochodzących<br />

z hodowli krajowej. Badania przeprowadzono<br />

w 2008 roku, w stadzie należącym do Agencji<br />

Nieruchomości Rolnych, Spółki w Żydowie.<br />

Materiał badawczy składał się z jagniąt tryczków<br />

i maciorek. Jagnięta utrzymywano w masywnych<br />

budynkach oraz stosowano żywienie według norm<br />

przy wykorzystaniu pasz gospodarskich (zielonka,<br />

kiszonka, siano susz) i pasz treściwych własnej<br />

produkcji. Po osiągnięciu masy ciała 35 kg (dopuszczając<br />

wahania rzędu ±1,5 kg), przed ubojem<br />

wykonano na żywych zwierzętach pomiary ciała,<br />

a następnie poddano je ubojowi, określając: cechy<br />

ubojowe, subiektywną wartość tusz, pomiary tuszy,<br />

skład wyrębów półtuszy, skład tkankowy tuszy<br />

na podstawie dysekcji udźca, cechy fizyczne<br />

i chemiczne mięsa mld oraz pr<strong>of</strong>il kwasów tłuszczowych<br />

w mięsie. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych<br />

badań wykazano podobną wartość rzeźną<br />

i jakość tusz i mięsa u maciorek w porównaniu<br />

do tryczków, tendencję do przewagi maciorek nad<br />

tryczkami w zakresie subiektywnej oceny barwy<br />

i konsystencji tłuszczu, który okazał się biały<br />

i spoisty u płci żeńskiej. Generalnie ocena jakości<br />

tusz i wartości mięsnej u obu płci wskazała na ich<br />

przydatność do produkcji wysokowartościowych<br />

tusz z przeznaczeniem na rynek krajowy oraz na<br />

eksport.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Beata Kuczyńska<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Bydła<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 135<strong>–</strong>141<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and body conformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher sheep bred in Poland<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

Abstract: Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and<br />

body conformation <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher sheep<br />

bred in Poland. The research was conducted on<br />

600 ewes and 658 lambs <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this research was to establish the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on the reproduction<br />

level in ewes as well as on the body weight at<br />

56 day <strong>of</strong> lambs’ age and the muscularity examined<br />

by the USG method. Basing on the obtained<br />

results, the necessity <strong>of</strong> further improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction traits has been approved. Moreover,<br />

the lower fatness <strong>of</strong> lambs may be achieved by the<br />

broader usage <strong>of</strong> the French-origin merino rams in<br />

the crossing schemes.<br />

Key words: sheep, Berrichon du Cher, reproduction,<br />

body weight, muscularity.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Berrichon du Cher is the sheep breed<br />

<strong>of</strong> the French origin, which has been<br />

well adapted to the climate conditions in<br />

Poland and it is <strong>of</strong>ten used in multi-breed<br />

crosses with the maternal sheep breeds <strong>of</strong><br />

Poland in the aim to improve the slaughter<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> meat lambs (Jagiełło, 2001;<br />

Niżnikowski, 1995; Niżnikowski et al.,<br />

1998; 2001). The breeding program for<br />

Polish Berrichon du Cher flocks was<br />

established in 18 March 2004 and being<br />

realized in the companies <strong>of</strong> Polish Property<br />

Agency (Niżnikowski, Oprządek,<br />

2004). Therefore, four rams <strong>of</strong> Berrichon<br />

du Cher has been imported from France<br />

to loosen the level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in the<br />

Polish flocks. Once the rams were used<br />

in crosses, the question was to check the<br />

reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> ewes and<br />

the muscularity <strong>of</strong> lambs measured by the<br />

USG method at 56 day <strong>of</strong> lambs’ age. The<br />

obtained results were showed in tables<br />

with the proper and accurate comment.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Reproduction performance. The research<br />

was conducted in the 2006<strong>–</strong>2008<br />

on the biggest flock <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du<br />

Cherr sheep, which was the property <strong>of</strong><br />

the Company <strong>of</strong> Polish Property Agency<br />

in Żydowo, the wielkopolskie voivodeship.<br />

The material was the flock <strong>of</strong> 600<br />

ewes at the age <strong>of</strong> 1<strong>–</strong>11 years. Both<br />

groups, ewes and lambs, were from the<br />

litter size <strong>of</strong> 1<strong>–</strong>2 heads. The animals were<br />

maintained indoors and were fed due to<br />

the norms (Osikowski et al., 1993). The<br />

mating season was during the summer<br />

months. The data concerning the litter<br />

size and rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs were collected


136 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

due to the breeding documentations. The<br />

reproduction traits were calculated due<br />

to the method proposed by Petersson<br />

and Danell (1985). In case <strong>of</strong> the rearing<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> lambs the statistical model<br />

contained the effects <strong>of</strong> year, number <strong>of</strong><br />

the parity, type <strong>of</strong> birth as well as the sex<br />

and ram origin, as well as double-factors<br />

interactions. Due to the litter size, the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> birth and sex as well as<br />

the interaction between these factors were<br />

excluded from the statistical model. The<br />

statistical calculations were done due to<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> least square means in the<br />

SPSS v.12.0 s<strong>of</strong>tware (ANON., 2004)<br />

and the effects <strong>of</strong> factors were estimated<br />

by the F-test. The comparisons for the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> litter size and sex on examined<br />

traits were done due to the Duncan test<br />

(Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> body conformation. The<br />

research was carried out on the female<br />

and male lambs (n = 658) in 2008. The<br />

body weights <strong>of</strong> lambs at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age<br />

were collected in both sexes. Also the<br />

USG measurements (Honda 2000 device;<br />

ANON., 2001) were done on the mld<br />

muscle on live lambs <strong>of</strong> both sexes at<br />

56 day <strong>of</strong> age. The USG measurements<br />

allowed to establish the live parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> muscularity: height, spread, round and<br />

acreage <strong>of</strong> “eye” <strong>of</strong> loin, as well as the fat<br />

over the “eye” <strong>of</strong> loin. The results were<br />

calculated due to the method described<br />

in the previous point with the statistical<br />

model concerning the effects <strong>of</strong> sex,<br />

type <strong>of</strong> lamb birth, the ram origin (either<br />

Polish or French) and qualification to<br />

the flock as well as the chosen second-<br />

-level interaction between chosen factors<br />

(ANON., 2004; Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions<br />

on reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> Berrichon<br />

du Cher was presented in Table 1. The<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on reproduction performance in Berrichon du Cher<br />

in Żydowo<br />

Traits<br />

Fertility Prolificacy Rearing <strong>of</strong><br />

(heads) (heads/lambing) lambs (heads)<br />

birth type <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX<br />

sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong>: number <strong>of</strong> lambing XX NS NS<br />

year <strong>of</strong> experiment XX NS XX<br />

ram origin <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

birth type <strong>of</strong> lambs * sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

year <strong>of</strong> experiment * birth type <strong>of</strong> lambs <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX<br />

Interactions year <strong>of</strong> experiment * sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

<strong>of</strong>:<br />

year <strong>of</strong> experiment * ram origin <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

birth type <strong>of</strong> lambs * ram origin <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

sex* ram origin <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

n 600 543 658<br />

Statistics:<br />

X 0.88 1.14 0.92<br />

S 0.03 0.04 0.03<br />

Statistical significance at: XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and body conformation... 137<br />

analyzed factors affected the fertility<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> ewes at P ≤ 0.01. The rearing<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs was affected by the birth type,<br />

year <strong>of</strong> research and the interaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> (year <strong>of</strong> research × birth type). The<br />

prolificacy indicator was not affected by<br />

any <strong>of</strong> examined factors probably due to<br />

its relatively low value. This result might<br />

influence the levels <strong>of</strong> rearing indicator,<br />

which was at the quite high level, probably<br />

due to the low number <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

which were reared by ewes. The fertility<br />

indicator was presented on the Figure 1.<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> this indicator increased<br />

up to the 8th lambing and afterwards it<br />

reached only lower values. Presented results<br />

indicated the necessity <strong>of</strong> breeding<br />

work in the aim to increase the average<br />

litter size in this flock and also due to<br />

the lower fertility, the ewes older than 8<br />

years should be excluded from the flock.<br />

These suggested practice may improve<br />

both fertility and prolificacy in this sheep<br />

breed.<br />

The birth type affected the rearing<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> lambs at the P ≤ 0.01 (Tab. 2);<br />

better results <strong>of</strong> rearing were observed<br />

in the single-born lambs. This relation<br />

was also <strong>of</strong>ten observed in other sheep<br />

breeds (Jagiełło, 2001; Niżnikowski,<br />

1995; Niżnikowski et al., 1998), but the<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> income caused by the higher<br />

number <strong>of</strong> reared lambs is definitely<br />

higher than the costs <strong>of</strong> the lamb losses in<br />

the bigger litters. Therefore, the improvements<br />

<strong>of</strong> prolificacy <strong>of</strong> ewes and rearing<br />

Fertility (heads)<br />

1,1<br />

1<br />

0,9<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0<br />

1(N= 83) 2(N= 67) 3(N= 74) 4(N= 72) 5(N= 58) 6(N= 98) 7(N= 96) 8(N= 32) 9(N= 11) 10(N= 8) 11(N= 1)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> lambing<br />

FIGURE 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> lambing on the fertility indicator in Berrichon du Cher ewes (heads)<br />

TABLE 2. Influence <strong>of</strong> the birth type <strong>of</strong> lambs on the rearing indicator in Berrichon du Cher ewes<br />

(heads)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

Trait<br />

Singles<br />

Twins<br />

LSM 0.96 0.89<br />

SE 0.02 0.03<br />

Rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs (heads)<br />

* B A<br />

N 449 209<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: A<strong>–</strong>B <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01


138 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> lambs at the same time is<br />

worthy to consider to achieve the higher<br />

income <strong>of</strong> the sheep breeding.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and<br />

interaction on the body conformation<br />

(muscularity) and body weight <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

were presented in Table 3. No statistically<br />

approved interactions were observed<br />

in these examined traits. The qualification<br />

to the flock affected statistically all<br />

examined traits at P ≤ 0.01. Moreover, the<br />

body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age was affected<br />

by the sex <strong>of</strong> lambs as well as the ram<br />

origin affected the thickness <strong>of</strong> fat cover<br />

over loin eye in lambs, both at P ≤ 0.05.<br />

The differences in live body conformation<br />

traits and body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong><br />

age were presented in the Table 4 due<br />

to the sex <strong>of</strong> lambs and the ram origin.<br />

Higher values in all traits (P ≤ 0.05) were<br />

observed in male-lambs in opposite to the<br />

female lambs. Whereas the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

the muscularity level <strong>of</strong> live lambs due<br />

to the ram origin expressed similar levels<br />

in almost all traits, excluding the thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat cover over loin eye, which<br />

was statistically higher in lambs coming<br />

from the cross with the French rams<br />

(P ≤ 0.05). This observation indicated<br />

that the breeding work on the Berrichon<br />

du Cher in France was focused on the<br />

lower fatness <strong>of</strong> carcasses with maintaining<br />

the high meatiness standards at the<br />

same time. The lower fatness <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

coming from the crosses <strong>of</strong> the Polish<br />

ewes <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher and French<br />

rams <strong>of</strong> this breed indicated the validity<br />

<strong>of</strong> importing rams from France.<br />

The live body conformation measurements<br />

and body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong><br />

age due to the qualification to the flock<br />

were shown in Table 5. All examined<br />

traits appeared to be statistically higher<br />

(P ≤ 0.01) in lambs qualified to the flock,<br />

what proved the proper trend in the<br />

breeding work in this flock. Higher value<br />

TABLE 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on USG measurements <strong>of</strong> mld muscle and body<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> lambs at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age in in Berrichon du Cher (n = 162)<br />

Traits<br />

sex<br />

birth<br />

type <strong>of</strong><br />

lambs<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

ram<br />

origin<br />

qualification<br />

to the<br />

flock<br />

sex*<br />

birth<br />

type <strong>of</strong><br />

lambs<br />

Interactions <strong>of</strong><br />

sex*<br />

qualification<br />

to<br />

the flock<br />

birth type<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs *<br />

ram origin<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye<br />

(mm) NS NS NS XX NS NS NS 16.55 0.41<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye<br />

(mm) NS NS NS XX NS NS NS 50.13 1.18<br />

Fat cover over<br />

loin eye (mm) NS NS X XX NS NS NS 1.43 0.06<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> loin eye<br />

(mm) NS NS NS XX NS NS NS 122.87 2.88<br />

Loin eye area<br />

(cm 2 ) NS NS NS XX NS NS NS 6.54 0.21<br />

Body weight at<br />

56 day <strong>of</strong> age (kg) X NS NS XX NS NS NS 15.83 0.42<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

x<br />

S


Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and body conformation... 139<br />

TABLE 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> sex and ram origin on USG measurements <strong>of</strong> mld muscle and body weight <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age in in Berrichon du Cher (n = 162)<br />

Sex<br />

Ram origin<br />

Traits<br />

male female<br />

lambs lambs<br />

French Polish<br />

Number (heads) 73 89 38 124<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 17.03 16.07 15.89 17.21<br />

SE 0.63 0.61 0.70 0.44<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 49.61 50.66 49.32 50.94<br />

SE 1.81 1.75 2.02 1.27<br />

LSM 1.39 1.48 1.31 1.56<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) SE 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.06<br />

* B A<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 122.06 123.67 120.56 125.18<br />

SE 4.39 4.24 4.91 3.08<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 )<br />

LSM 6.62 6.47 6.37 6.72<br />

SE 0.32 0.31 0.36 0.22<br />

LSM 16.93 14.73 15.16 16.51<br />

Body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age (kg) SE 0.63 0.61 0.71 0.44<br />

* B A<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at: a<strong>–</strong>b <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05<br />

TABLE 5. Effects <strong>of</strong> qualification to the flock on USG measurements <strong>of</strong> mld muscle and body weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age in in Berrichon du Cher (n = 162)<br />

Traits Qualified to the flock Unqualified to the flock<br />

Number (heads) 50 112<br />

LSM 18.26 14.83<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

SE 0.65 0.53<br />

* B A<br />

LSM 55.97 44.29<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

SE 1.87 1.52<br />

* B A<br />

LSM 1.60 1.27<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm)<br />

SE 0.08 0.07<br />

* A B<br />

LSM 137.45 108.29<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

SE 4.54 3.70<br />

* B A<br />

LSM 7.57 5.52<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 )<br />

SE 0.33 0.27<br />

* B A<br />

LSM 17.95 13.71<br />

Body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age (kg) SE 0.66 0.53<br />

* B A<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: A<strong>–</strong>B <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01


140 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

<strong>of</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong> the fat cover over loin<br />

eye in lambs qualified to the flock was<br />

probably caused by the better body development<br />

at this age and it was pictured<br />

by the higher body weight in contrary to<br />

the lambs non-qualified to the flock.<br />

Generally summing up, the presented<br />

results indicated the urgent need to<br />

provide the breeding work aiming the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> reproduction traits in<br />

the maternal flocks <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher<br />

and usage <strong>of</strong> the French-imported rams<br />

<strong>of</strong> this breed to obtain the better slaughter<br />

lambs. These endeavors are extremely<br />

important, because the Berrichon du<br />

Cher is a paternal component in the multi-<br />

-breed crossing schemes to improve the<br />

meat performance <strong>of</strong> the meat cross-lambs<br />

(Jagiełło, 2001; Niżnikowski, 1995;<br />

Niżnikowski et al., 1998; 2001).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The obtained results led up to the following<br />

statements and conclusions:<br />

1. The year <strong>of</strong> experiment affected the<br />

fertility <strong>of</strong> ewes and rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs.<br />

The age <strong>of</strong> ewe affected also the fertility<br />

indicator, which reached the highest<br />

values up to the 8th lambing. Better<br />

results <strong>of</strong> rearing were observed in<br />

the single-born lambs in contrary to<br />

the twin-born lambs<br />

2. The prolificacy indicator was not affected<br />

by any <strong>of</strong> examined factors<br />

probably due to their relatively low<br />

values.<br />

3. The body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age was<br />

affected by the sex <strong>of</strong> lambs and higher<br />

values were observed in male-lambs<br />

in opposite to the female lambs. The<br />

ram origin affected the thickness <strong>of</strong> fat<br />

over the “eye” <strong>of</strong> loin in lambs, which<br />

was lower in lambs coming from the<br />

cross with the French rams. The higher<br />

superiority <strong>of</strong> lambs qualified to<br />

the flock has been indicated in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> almost all body conformation traits<br />

and body weight at 56 day.<br />

4. Basing on the obtained results, the<br />

necessity <strong>of</strong> further improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction traits has been approved.<br />

Moreover, the lower fatness <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

may be achieved by the broader usage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the French-origin merino rams in<br />

the crossing schemes.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2001: HS-2000 <strong>–</strong> instrukcja użytkownika.<br />

Honda Electronics Co., LTD.<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA 2004.<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 2001: Wybrane aspekty produkcji<br />

jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

zlokalizowanego na glebach lekkich, Rozprawa<br />

doktorska wykonana w Zakładzie Hodowli<br />

Owiec i Kóz <strong>SGGW</strong> w Warszawie (maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1995: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 55547 92/C/569 pt.:<br />

„Intensyfikacja produkcji oraz poprawa jakości<br />

tusz jagnięcych owiec nizinnych hodowanych<br />

w Polsce Centralnej”, Komitet Badań Naukowych,<br />

Warszawa (maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., GLIŃSKI M.,<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 1998: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 5 P06E 001 95C/2470 pt.:<br />

„Produkcja jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

rolniczego położonego na glebach<br />

lekkich”, Komitet Badań Naukowych, Warszawa<br />

(maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., JAGIEŁŁO M.,<br />

GLIŃSKI M., 2001: Tempo wzrostu i wartość<br />

rzeźna jagniąt mieszańców rasy berrichon<br />

z wrzosówką i owcą żelaźnieńską. Pr. i Mater.<br />

Zoot. 58, 115<strong>–</strong>124.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., OPRZĄDEK A., 2004: Program<br />

hodowli Owiec w Spółkach Agencji Nieruchomości<br />

Rolnych na lata 2004<strong>–</strong>2015. Agencja<br />

Nieruchomości Rolnych, Zespół Nadzoru


Level <strong>of</strong> reproduction performance and body conformation... 141<br />

Właścicielskiego, Sekcja Zasobów Genetycznych<br />

Hodowli, Warszawa, 1<strong>–</strong>51.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN K.,<br />

1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym. Instytut<br />

Zootechniki, Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

PETERSSON C.J., DANELL O., 1985: Factors<br />

Influencing Lamb Survival in Four Swedish<br />

Sheep Breeds. Acta Agric. Scand., 35, 217<strong>–</strong>232.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka badań zootechnicznych.<br />

PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

Streszczenie: Poziom cech rozrodu i umięśnienia<br />

u owiec rasy mięsnej berrichon du cher z hodowli<br />

krajowej. Badania przeprowadzono na 600 maciorkach<br />

i 658 jagniętach rasy berrichon du cher.<br />

Oceniono wpływ wybranych czynników i interakcji<br />

na cechy rozrodu matek oraz masy ciała w wieku<br />

56 dni i poziom umięśnienia jagniąt. Wykazano<br />

wpływ roku doświadczenia na wskaźniki płodności<br />

i odchowu jagniąt, oraz wieku matki na wskaźniki<br />

płodności, które okazały się najwyższe w trakcie<br />

pierwszych 8 wykotów w życiu, natomiast jagnięta<br />

z urodzeń pojedynczych odchowywane były w znacząco<br />

wyższym zakresie w porównaniu do jagniąt<br />

pochodzących z urodzeń bliźniaczych. W odniesieniu<br />

do wpływu badanych czynników na wskaźnik<br />

plenności stwierdzono barak ich istotnego oddziaływania,<br />

wynikający prawdopodobnie z niskiego<br />

ich poziomu w stadzie. Stwierdzono wpływ płci<br />

na masę ciała w wieku 56 dni, która okazała się<br />

wyższa u tryczków w porównaniu do maciorek; pochodzenia<br />

po tryku na poziom otłuszczenia jagniąt,<br />

które okazało się niższe u potomstwa uzyskanego<br />

po rozpłodnikach francuskich oraz zdecydowaną<br />

przewagę osobników wybranych do dalszej hodowli<br />

nad wybrakowanymi w zakresie większości<br />

analizowanych cech masy ciała i umięśnienia. Na<br />

podstawie przeprowadzonych badań stwierdzono<br />

konieczność doskonalenia cech rozrodu oraz zasadność<br />

szerszego wykorzystania w rozpłodzie tryków<br />

pochodzących z hodowli francuskiej, przekazujących<br />

korzystne założenia na potomstwo w zakresie<br />

niższego poziomu otłuszczenia tusz.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 143<strong>–</strong>148<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> reproduction level and body conformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais sheep bred in Poland<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

Abstract: Comparison <strong>of</strong> reproduction level and<br />

body conformation <strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais<br />

sheep bred in Poland. The research was carried<br />

out in 2008 on the sheep flock owned by the Company<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Property Agency in Żołędnica. The<br />

sheep flock consisted <strong>of</strong> 109 Charollais and 46<br />

Suffolk ewes with <strong>of</strong>fspring (125 and 44 lambs,<br />

respectively). The reproduction performance <strong>of</strong><br />

ewes as well as the body weight and muscularity<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age were investigated. The<br />

reproduction traits <strong>of</strong> both meat sheep breeds were<br />

at the low level, especially in the Suffolk breed. It<br />

is advised to conduct the selection towards the improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the frequency <strong>of</strong> twin litters, which<br />

should lead to the improvement <strong>of</strong> overall reproduction<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> both meat sheep breeds kept in<br />

Żołędnica. The results <strong>of</strong> live USG measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> muscularity and fattiness on the mld muscle on<br />

lambs at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age were similar in both examined<br />

breeds.<br />

Key words: sheep, Suffolk, Charollais, reproduction,<br />

body weight, muscularity.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Suffolk and Charollais sheep are<br />

the meat breeds and they have been both<br />

existing in the Polish sheep population<br />

for many years, nevertheless the crash<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>itability in sheep production<br />

led to the limitation <strong>of</strong> estimation the<br />

production capabilities in all sheep breeds<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 2006). The Company<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Property Agency in Żołędnica<br />

is the owner <strong>of</strong> these two sheep breeds’<br />

flocks, still having the potential to initiate<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> slaughter lambs<br />

<strong>of</strong> good trade quality for the national<br />

market. Considering the huge importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charollais and Suffolk breeds to<br />

cross with the maternal national breeds<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 1992), the aim <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to examine the reproduction<br />

traits and muscularity level <strong>of</strong> these<br />

two meat breeds, bred under the same<br />

environmental circumstances.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The research was carried out on the sheep<br />

flocks <strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais meat<br />

breeds in 2008. Both flocks were owned<br />

by <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>of</strong> Polish Property<br />

Agency in Żołędnica, wielkopolskie<br />

voivodeship. The sheep <strong>of</strong> both breeds<br />

were at the age <strong>of</strong> 1 to 8 years, bred in<br />

Żołędnica in 2003<strong>–</strong>2008. Both ewes and<br />

lambs were born as singles, twins or triplets.<br />

The animals were bred in building<br />

during all year and were fed accordingly<br />

to the feeding norms for sheep (Osikowski


144 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

et al., 1993). The mating season took<br />

place in Autumn. The data considering<br />

the litter sizes as well as rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

were collected basing on the breeding<br />

books. The levels <strong>of</strong> reproduction traits<br />

were estimated due the method <strong>of</strong> Petersson<br />

and Danell (1985). In case <strong>of</strong> lambs’<br />

rearing indicator, the following LSM<br />

model considering the effects <strong>of</strong> lambing<br />

number, type <strong>of</strong> birth, sex and breed as<br />

well as the chosen interaction was used.<br />

Accordingly to the litter size, the statistical<br />

model excluded the type <strong>of</strong> birth and<br />

sex as well as the interaction between<br />

them. The statistical calculations were<br />

prepared using the LSM method in SPSS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware (v. 12.0; ANON., 2004), and the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors were estimated<br />

with F-test. The Duncan test was used to<br />

establish the differences between levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> breed, litter size and sex (Ruszczyc,<br />

1981).<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> body weight and muscularity<br />

level at age <strong>of</strong> 56 day <strong>of</strong> male and<br />

female lambs <strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais<br />

was calculated basing on data collected<br />

from the breeding books completed in the<br />

Company in 2008. The measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

mld muscle on live lambs were collected<br />

using the USG technique (Honda 2000;<br />

ANON., 2001) and they were as following:<br />

height, spread, round <strong>of</strong> the loin eye<br />

and loin eye area as well as the fat cover<br />

over the loin eye. The statistical calculations<br />

were done as it was described in<br />

previous paragraph (ANON., 2004) due<br />

to the LSM model considering the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong>: breed, type <strong>of</strong> birth and sex <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

as well as chosen double-factor interactions.<br />

The Duncan test was used to estimate<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> breed, litter size and<br />

sex on studied traits (Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the research were presented<br />

in Tables 1<strong>–</strong>4. The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors<br />

and interactions on reproduction traits<br />

TABLE 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> Charollais and<br />

Suffolk ewes<br />

Items<br />

Fertility Prolificacy Rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

(heads) (heads/lambing) (heads)<br />

breed NS X XX<br />

Effects<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX<br />

sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

lambing no XX NS NS<br />

breed * type <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> XX<br />

breed * sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

Interactions<br />

breed * lambing no <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth * sex <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth * lambing no <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

sex * lambing no <strong>–</strong> <strong>–</strong> NS<br />

N 154 135 169<br />

Statistics<br />

X 0.89 1.14 0.93<br />

S 0.05 0.07 0.23<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant; “<strong>–</strong>“ <strong>–</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> data


Comparison <strong>of</strong> reproduction level and body conformation... 145<br />

were shown in Table 1. The average value<br />

<strong>of</strong> fertility indicator was typical for the<br />

imported meat sheep breeds in Poland,<br />

whereas the effects <strong>of</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

on studied traits was also representative<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 2003; 2004; 2007). The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> ewes’ prolificacy and lambs’<br />

rearing in Żołędnica should have been<br />

treated more principally.<br />

As it was shown in Table 2, the higher<br />

level <strong>of</strong> studied traits was observed in<br />

Charollais than in Suffolk. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction traits considering the lambing<br />

number (age <strong>of</strong> ewe) indicated the<br />

increasing trend up to the 4th lambing,<br />

which was also compatible to the results<br />

and general tendencies reported by other<br />

authors (Niżnikowski et al., 2003; 2004;<br />

2007). This tendency was statistically<br />

approved (p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01) in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fertility indicator <strong>of</strong> ewes.<br />

The statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01)<br />

higher values <strong>of</strong> rearing lambs was<br />

observed in singles and triplets comparing<br />

to twins (Tab. 4). The supremacy <strong>of</strong><br />

triplets over the twins might be explained<br />

by some unexpected incidents, such like<br />

the greater attention <strong>of</strong> service, which<br />

increase the chance <strong>of</strong> their survivability.<br />

Due to the perspective <strong>of</strong> breeding <strong>of</strong><br />

particular sheep breed, this tendency is<br />

expected (Niżnikowski et al., 2003; 2004;<br />

2007).<br />

The results expressed higher level <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction traits in Charollais than in<br />

Suffolk, which situation is quite typical<br />

for the Polish sheep breeding. However,<br />

the selection work should be put more in<br />

the aim <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> twins born and increase <strong>of</strong> fertility,<br />

which should lead to the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

overall reproduction performance.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the body weight and<br />

muscularity level at age <strong>of</strong> 56 day <strong>of</strong><br />

Charollais and Suffolk gave compatible<br />

results to the other observed on other<br />

animals’ material (Niżnikowski et al.,<br />

1992ab) and no statistical effects <strong>of</strong><br />

chosen factors (excluding only one interaction)<br />

on body weight and USG measurements<br />

was observed (Tab. 5). Similar<br />

comparison between breeds and sexes did<br />

not expressed any statistically approved<br />

differences (Tab. 6). These observation<br />

indicated that these flocks are consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> the high value breeding material in<br />

both investigated sheep breeds.<br />

TABLE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> breed on reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> Charollais and Suffolk ewes<br />

Items<br />

Breed<br />

Statistical<br />

Charollais Suffolk significance<br />

LSM 0.96 0.82<br />

Fertility (heads)<br />

SE 0.06 0.06<br />

N 109 45<br />

LSM 1.28 1.00 *<br />

Prolificacy (heads/lambing) SE 0.10 0.10<br />

N 96 39<br />

LSM 1.00 0.84 **<br />

Rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs (heads) SE 0.04 0.03<br />

N 125 44<br />

Statistical significance at: * <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; ** <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


146 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> lambing number on reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> Charollais and Suffolk ewes<br />

Lambing no<br />

1(A)<br />

2(B)<br />

3(C)<br />

4(D)<br />

5(E)<br />

6(F)<br />

7(G)<br />

8(H)<br />

Indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

fertility (heads) prolificacy (heads/lambing) rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs (heads)<br />

LSM 1.00 1.14 1.00<br />

SE 0.31 0.44 0.12<br />

N 1 1 1<br />

LSM 1.00 1.14 1.00<br />

SE 0.10 0.15 0.04<br />

* E, F, G<br />

N 10 10 10<br />

LSM 1.00 1.44 0.85<br />

SE 0.10 0.15 0.05<br />

* E, F, G<br />

N 10 10 13<br />

LSM 0.96 1.30 0.90<br />

SE 0.05 0.07 0.03<br />

* E, F, G<br />

N 56 56 78<br />

LSM 0.72 1.06 1.00<br />

SE 0.05 0.10 0.02<br />

* B, C, D<br />

N 50 40 48<br />

LSM 0.60 0.86 1.00<br />

SE 0.11 0.19 0.05<br />

* B, C, D, H<br />

N 9 6 6<br />

LSM 0.68 1.23 0.92<br />

SE 0.09 0.16 0.09<br />

* B, C, D<br />

N 14 8 9<br />

LSM 0.97 0.93 1.00<br />

SE 0.15 0.22 0.07<br />

* F<br />

N 4 4 4<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a,..., h <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., H <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01<br />

TABLE 4. Effect <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> birth on rearing indicator due to the litter size <strong>of</strong> Charollais and Suffolk<br />

lambs<br />

Litter size<br />

Trait<br />

singles (A) twins (B) triplets (C)<br />

LSM 1.00 0.80 1.00<br />

SE 0.02 0.04 0.08<br />

Rearing <strong>of</strong> lambs (heads)<br />

* B A, c B<br />

N 102 64 3<br />

* <strong>–</strong> Statistical significance at: a, b, c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A, B, C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


Comparison <strong>of</strong> reproduction level and body conformation... 147<br />

TABLE 5. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on USG measurements <strong>of</strong> mld muscle as well as<br />

the body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age in Charolais (n = 14) and Suffolk (n = 23) lambs<br />

Traits<br />

sex<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Interactions Statistics<br />

type<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

birth<br />

breed<br />

sex *<br />

type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth<br />

sex *<br />

breed<br />

type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth *<br />

breed<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm) NS NS NS NS NS NS 10.69 0.68<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm) NS NS NS NS NS NS 31.38 1.26<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.74 0.09<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm) NS NS NS NS NS NS 76.75 3.01<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) NS NS NS NS NS NS 3.89 0.36<br />

Body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age (kg) NS NS NS NS NS X 13.20 0.78<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

x<br />

S<br />

TABLE 6. Effect <strong>of</strong> sex and breed on USG measurements <strong>of</strong> mld muscle as well as the body weight at<br />

56 day <strong>of</strong> age in Charolais and Suffolk lambs<br />

Items<br />

Sex<br />

Breed<br />

male female Charolais Suffolk<br />

Number (heads) 12 25 14 23<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 11.25 10.13 9.80 11.58<br />

SE 1.32 0.54 0.77 0.98<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 32.29 30.47 30.36 32.40<br />

SE 2.46 0.99 1.44 1.83<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 0.71 0.77 0.76 0.72<br />

SE 0.17 0.70 0.10 0.13<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> loin eye (mm)<br />

LSM 79.75 73.76 73.52 79.98<br />

SE 5.88 2.38 3.46 4.38<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 )<br />

LSM 4.14 3.65 3.53 4.26<br />

SE 0.70 0.28 0.41 0.52<br />

Body weight at 56 day <strong>of</strong> age (kg)<br />

LSM 13.43 12.98 13.04 13.37<br />

SE 1.52 0.62 0.90 1.13<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The low reproduction parameters were<br />

observed in all examined sheep breeds,<br />

especially in Suffolk breed. Therefore<br />

it is advised to start the selection work<br />

towards the improvement <strong>of</strong> twins<br />

frequency in both breeds, which should<br />

lead to the improvement <strong>of</strong> overall reproduction<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> Suffolk and Charollais<br />

flocks in Żołędnica.<br />

Similar levels <strong>of</strong> live muscularity and<br />

fattiness measurements as well as <strong>of</strong><br />

the body weight at age <strong>of</strong> 56 day were<br />

observed.<br />

The results indicated the further direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the breeding work in flocks <strong>of</strong><br />

meat sheep breeds owned by the Company<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture Property in Żołędnica<br />

in the aim <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> the reproduction<br />

traits (especially Suffolk) and<br />

muscularity level.


148 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2001: HS-2000 <strong>–</strong> instrukcja użytkownika.<br />

Honda Electronics Co., LTD.<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service Solution<br />

base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS inc.<br />

USA.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., JANIKOWSKI W.T., NO-<br />

WAK W., RANT W., TRZYBIŃSKA D.,<br />

1992a: Przydatność do tuczu półintensywnego<br />

i wartość rzeźna jagniąt z krzyżowania towarowego<br />

owiec typu corriedale z trykami ras plennych<br />

i mięsnych. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Monogr.<br />

i Rozpr., 31, 71<strong>–</strong>90.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., JANIKOWSKI W.T., RANT<br />

W., TRZYBIŃSKA D., NOWAK W., 1992b:<br />

Przydatność do tuczu półintensywnego i wartość<br />

rzeźna jagniąt z krzyżowania towarowego<br />

owiec typu corriedale z trykami mięsnymi: ile<br />

de france i suffolk. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Monogr.<br />

i Rozpr., 31, 91<strong>–</strong>105.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., NIERADKO M., WOŹNIA-<br />

KOWSKA A., POPIELARCZYK D., 2003:<br />

Poziom cech rozrodu u ras matecznych owiec<br />

utrzymywanych na Podlasiu. Annales Universitatis<br />

Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio EE,<br />

Vol. XXI, N1, 17, 129<strong>–</strong>134.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., CZARNIAK B., BRUDKA<br />

G., 2004: Porównanie poziomu cech rozrodu<br />

owiec rasy wrzosówka i odmiany żelaźnieńskiej<br />

utrzymywanych w Doświadczalnej Fermie<br />

Owiec i Kóz <strong>SGGW</strong> w Żelaznej. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. PTZ, 72 (3), 51<strong>–</strong>58.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., STRZELEC E., POPIELAR-<br />

CZYK D., 2006: Economics and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

<strong>of</strong> sheep and goat production under new support<br />

regimes and market conditions in Central<br />

and Eastern Europe. Small Ruminant Research,<br />

62, 3, 159<strong>–</strong>165.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., POPIELARCZYK<br />

D., STRZELEC E., CZARNIAK B., 2007:<br />

Wpływ wybranych czynników na cechy rozrodu<br />

i masy ciała polskich owiec nizinnych odmiany<br />

żelaźnieńskiej. Roczniki Naukowe PTZ,<br />

t. 3, (2), 79<strong>–</strong>87.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN K.,<br />

1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym. Instytut<br />

Zootechniki Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

PETERSSON C.J., DANELL O., 1985: Factors Influencing<br />

Lamb Survival in Four Swedish Sheep<br />

Breeds. Acta Agric. Scand. 35, 217<strong>–</strong>232.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z. 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń zootechnicznych.<br />

PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

Streszczenie: Porównanie poziomów cech rozrodu<br />

i umięśnienia u owiec ras mięsnych suffolk i charollais<br />

z hodowli krajowej. Badania przeprowadzono<br />

w Spółce ANR w Żołędnicy w 2008 roku<br />

na materiale 109 maciorek rasy charollais oraz 46<br />

suffolk oraz na jagniętach tych ras odpowiednio<br />

125 i 44 sztuki. Ocenie poddano cechy rozrodu<br />

maciorek oraz masy ciała i umięśnienia mierzonego<br />

u jagniąt w wieku 56 dni. W zakresie cech<br />

rozrodu owiec ocenianych ras mięsnych wykazano<br />

niskie wskaźniki w szczególności w odniesieniu do<br />

rasy suffolk. Wskazane jest prowadzenie zabiegów<br />

selekcyjnych zmierzających do zwiększania częstotliwości<br />

rodzenia miotów bliźniaczych, które<br />

prowadzić powinny do poprawy wskaźników rozpłodu<br />

u owiec wszystkich ras mięsnych utrzymywanych<br />

w Żołędnicy. Pod względem oceny przyżyciowej<br />

umięśnienia i otłuszczenia, jak też i masy<br />

ciała w wieku 56 dni, wskazano podobny poziom<br />

badanych cech u obu ocenianych ras mięsnych.<br />

Przeprowadzone badania wskazały na potrzebę dalszego<br />

doskonalenia ras mięsnych utrzymywanych<br />

w Spółce ANR w kierunku poprawy cech rozrodu<br />

(szczególnie u rasy suffolk) i stopnia umięśnienia.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 149<strong>–</strong>159<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes with<br />

Polish Merino ewes on slaughter value and meat quality <strong>of</strong> lambs<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , ARTUR OPRZĄDEK 2 , EWA STRZELEC 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1 , BEATA KUCZYŃSKA 3<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

The Agricultural Property Agency <strong>–</strong> APA<br />

3<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds<br />

used in crossing schemes with Polish Merino ewes<br />

on slaughter value and meat quality <strong>of</strong> lambs. The<br />

research was carried out in 2008 on the sheep<br />

flock in Żydowo (APA). The experimental material<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> 49 ram-lambs <strong>of</strong> three genotype<br />

groups: the Polish Merino (MP) and its F 1 crosses<br />

with rams <strong>of</strong> Charolaise and Berrichon du Cher.<br />

The lambs were maintained in the massive buildings<br />

and they were fed accordingly to the norms<br />

using the farm feed (fodder, silage, hay, dehydrated<br />

forage) as well as the self-made concentrates.<br />

When the lambs achieved the slaughter weight <strong>of</strong><br />

35 kg (±1.5 kg), the body measurements at live<br />

animals were collected and then the slaughter<br />

characteristics and carcass quality were investigated<br />

on slaughtered lambs. The single crossing<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Merino ewes with rams <strong>of</strong> typical meat<br />

sheep breeds (Charolaise and Berrichon du Cher)<br />

led to the improvement <strong>of</strong> trade quality <strong>of</strong> carcasses<br />

accordingly to the EUROP classification<br />

as well as the improvement <strong>of</strong> meat quality from<br />

the F 1 crosses, which fully justifies their further<br />

breeding and improvement to fulfill the existing<br />

national sheep breeding needs.<br />

Key words: sheep, Polish Merino, single crossing,<br />

carcass quality, meat value.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Charolaise and Berrichon du Cher<br />

sheep breeds are very <strong>of</strong>ten use as the paternal<br />

component in multi-breed crossing<br />

schemes with national Polish maternal<br />

sheep breeds in the aim to improve the<br />

slaughter quality <strong>of</strong> F 1 lambs (Jagiełło,<br />

2001; Niżnikowski, 1995; Niżnikowski et<br />

al., 1998; 2001). Nowadays, the production<br />

<strong>of</strong> slaughter lambs is conducted mainly<br />

to cover the needs for export abroad, but<br />

it is well known, that the stimulation <strong>of</strong><br />

the national Polish market may bring the<br />

financial income in the sheep production<br />

independent to the international conditions.<br />

Therefore, it may be assumed that<br />

the popularity <strong>of</strong> lamb meat is going to<br />

increase, so the production <strong>of</strong> good-quality<br />

lamb carcasses basing on the national<br />

sheep population should be considered.<br />

Due to this fact, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> slaughter lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Merino and crosses with meat breeds and<br />

fattened till 35 kg, has been studied basing<br />

on the EUROP classification as well as<br />

the slaughter value and meat quality.<br />

Obtained results were shown in tables<br />

and proper comment was given.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The research was carried out in 2008 on<br />

the sheep flock in Żydowo (APA). The


150 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

experimental material consisted <strong>of</strong> 49<br />

ram-lambs <strong>of</strong> three genotype groups:<br />

Polish Merino (MP) and its F 1 crosses<br />

with rams <strong>of</strong> Charolaise and Berrichon<br />

du Cher. The lambs were maintained<br />

in massive buildings and they were fed<br />

accordingly to the norms using the farm<br />

feed (fodder, silage, hay, dehydrated<br />

forage) as well as the self-made concentrates.<br />

When the lambs achieved the<br />

slaughter weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg (±1.5 kg), the<br />

body measurements at live animals were<br />

collected regarding: length and round <strong>of</strong><br />

foreshrank, height in withers, length <strong>of</strong><br />

body, spread and depth <strong>of</strong> chest, length<br />

and spread <strong>of</strong> head (Niżnikowski, 1979).<br />

Then the lambs were slaughtered and the<br />

carcasses were chilled in 4°C throughout<br />

24 hours. The following items were<br />

estimated:<br />

I. Slaughter traits: age at slaughter,<br />

gross dressing percentage, weight <strong>of</strong><br />

carcass and weight <strong>of</strong> skin (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963).<br />

II. Carcass quality due to the EUROP<br />

classification: conformation class<br />

(E, U, R, O, P), fat class (1 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

lowest fat content, 2, 3, 4, 5 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

highest fat content), fat consistency<br />

(very cohesive, cohesive, tender,<br />

very tender) and fat colour (white or<br />

coloured).<br />

III. Carcass measurements: length and<br />

round <strong>of</strong> foreshrank (Niżnikowski,<br />

1979), spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint, depth <strong>of</strong><br />

leg, length <strong>of</strong> leg, round <strong>of</strong> leg, leg<br />

index (round <strong>of</strong> leg/ length <strong>of</strong> leg ×<br />

100), loin eye area, fat cover over<br />

loin eye (Nawara et al., 1963).<br />

IV. Carcass cuts composition (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963): kidney with fat, both<br />

shanks (front and hind), shoulder,<br />

neck, middle neck, rib back, loin,<br />

leg, breast and the valuable cuts<br />

(leg, rib back, loin and tenderloin).<br />

V. Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg: lean, bone<br />

and fat (Nawara et al., 1963).<br />

VI. Physical and chemical characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle: the pH-24<br />

value as well as the water, protein,<br />

fat and dry matter content (AOAC,<br />

1990).<br />

VII. Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the intramuscular<br />

fat <strong>of</strong> mld muscle. The fat extraction<br />

was prepared due to the Röse-<br />

-Gottlieb method (AOAC, 1990).<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile composition was<br />

determined with the gas chromatography<br />

due to the norms PN-EN ISO<br />

5508 (1996).<br />

Statistical calculations were done<br />

using the LSM analysis in the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

for Windows v. 12.0 (ANON., 2004)<br />

estimating the effects <strong>of</strong>: genotype, type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth, month <strong>of</strong> slaughter and the interaction:<br />

genotype × type <strong>of</strong> birth. Moreover,<br />

the correction factor in the regression<br />

model <strong>of</strong> body weight at slaughter was<br />

also applied. While the effect <strong>of</strong> sex on<br />

the researched traits was observed, the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the differences between<br />

factor levels were checked out with<br />

F-test (Ruszczyc, 1981). The traits mentioned<br />

in the II point are shown in Table.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors<br />

on body and carcass measurements<br />

as well as the slaughter value <strong>of</strong> rams<br />

were gathered in Table 1. The particular<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> genotype was observed in traits<br />

<strong>of</strong> body measurements, whereas the type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth affected only the traits <strong>of</strong> carcass<br />

weight and fat cover over the loin eye<br />

(values <strong>of</strong> both traits were higher in


Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes... 151<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on live body and carcass measurements (n = 49)<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

Interaction<br />

Items<br />

body month <strong>of</strong> genotype * X S<br />

genotype<br />

type slaughter type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

Live body measurements (cm)<br />

Height in withers NS NS NS NS 56.31 0.70<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> body X NS XX NS 62.06 0.32<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> chest X NS X NS 20.27 0.19<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> chest NS NS NS NS 26.45 0.39<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank XX NS NS NS 10.84 0.09<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank XX NS NS NS 8.44 0.06<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head XX NS NS X 19.06 0.16<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head NS NS NS NS 10.69 0.11<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening NS NS NS NS 157.70 6.10<br />

Slaughter yield (%) NS NS <strong>–</strong> NS 42.30 0.34<br />

Pelt (kg) NS NS XX NS 3.07 0.06<br />

Carcass (kg) NS X XX NS 15.75 0.12<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint (cm) NS NS NS NS 3.51 0.02<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS X NS 23.23 0.38<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS NS NS 22.66 0.20<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS XX NS 38.53 0.28<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%) NS NS <strong>–</strong> NS 170.77 2.26<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) NS NS NS NS 5.31 0.08<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) NS NS XX NS 3.18 0.08<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) NS NS XX NS 15.55 0.31<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) NS X XX NS 1.40 0.11<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

TABLE .Effect <strong>of</strong> birth tye <strong>of</strong> lambs on chosen slauhter and meat uality traits (n = 49)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

Statistical<br />

Items<br />

singles<br />

twins<br />

significance<br />

20 29<br />

LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Carcass (kg) 15.48 0.18 16.02* 0.15<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Fat cover over the loin eye (mm) 1.13 0.17 1.67 0.15 *<br />

Carcass cuts<br />

Breast (kg) 1.23 0.03 1.29 0.03 *<br />

Breast (%) 15.94 0.30 16.15 0.26 *<br />

Physical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 5.53 0.02 5.60* 0.02<br />

Statistical significance at: * <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05


152 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

twins than in singles <strong>–</strong> Tab. 2). Similar<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> differences was observed in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> half-carcass weight and breast<br />

weight as well as the pH-value after 24<br />

hours <strong>of</strong> cooling. The estimation <strong>of</strong> other<br />

variation sources was observed as it was<br />

expected (Jagiełło, 2001).<br />

The body measurements <strong>of</strong> live lambs<br />

are presented in Table 3. Significantly<br />

longest body length was observed in<br />

crosses with Charolaise and also the<br />

spread <strong>of</strong> chest was the smallest comparing<br />

to the other lamb groups. Moreover,<br />

the lamb-crosses with the meat rams<br />

expressed shorter heads and shorter<br />

foreshanks comparing to the pure Polish<br />

Merino lambs, whereas the round <strong>of</strong> foreshank<br />

was the smallest in lamb-crosses<br />

with Berrichon du Cher lambs. Overall<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> body measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

TABLE 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on live body and carcass measurements as well as on the slaughter value<br />

<strong>of</strong> ram-lambs (n = 49)<br />

Genotype<br />

Polish Merino<br />

Polish<br />

Polish<br />

Items<br />

Merino*Berrichon Merino*Charolais<br />

(A)<br />

du Cher (B)<br />

(C)<br />

n = 20 n = 16 n = 13<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Live body measurements (cm)<br />

Height in withers 56.82 1.15 54.92 1.20 57.19 1.33<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> body 61.00 C 0.53 61.72 c 0.55 63.46 A,b 0.61<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> foreshank 11.39 B,C 0.14 10.57 A 0.15 10.56 A 0.16<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> foreshank 8.70 B 0.10 8.13 c,A 0.11 8.50 b 0.12<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> head 20.04 B,C 0.27 18.44 A 0.28 18.71 A 0.31<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> head 10.80 0.17 10.47 0.18 10.80 0.20<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> chest 20.91 C 0.32 20.50 c 0.33 19.39 A,b 0.37<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> chest 27.05 0.63 25.61 0.67 26.67 0.73<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening 155.53 10.00 169.27 10.49 148.28 11.57<br />

Pelt (kg) 3.08 0.10 3.04 0.10 3.08 0.11<br />

Carcass (kg) 15.45 0.19 15.97 0.20 15.82 0.22<br />

Slaughter yield (%) 41.82 0.54 42.67 0.57 42.42 0.63<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint (cm) 3.56 0.03 3.47 0.04 3.50 0.04<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 23.10 0.62 23.37 0.65 23.21 0.72<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 22.99 0.33 22.99 0.35 22.00 0.39<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) 38.05 0.47 39.13 0.49 38.40 0.54<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%) 168.05 3.59 169.71 3.86 174.55 4.26<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) 15.68 0.51 15.19 0.54 15.78 0.59<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye (cm) 5.23 0.13 5.19 0.14 5.49 0.15<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) 3.17 0.12 3.32 0.13 3.07 0.14<br />

Fat cover over loin eye (mm) 1.32 0.18 1.45 0.19 1.43 0.21<br />

Statistical significance at: a,..., c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes... 153<br />

live lamb-crosses guides to the general<br />

observation, that the single crossing <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Merino ewes with rams <strong>of</strong> meat<br />

breeds causes changes in body structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> lamb-crosses: shorter legs and shorter<br />

heads, longer body and thinner chest,<br />

when the Charolaise rams were used, as<br />

well as causes thinner limbs when the<br />

Berrichon du Cher rams were used in<br />

crossing. Therefore, the diversification<br />

<strong>of</strong> body structure was reported. Such significant<br />

differences were not observed<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> slaughter value and carcass<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> lambs.<br />

The subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the carcass<br />

was presented in Table 4. The results<br />

indicated the better quality <strong>of</strong> crosses<br />

with Berrichon du Cher comparing to<br />

the other groups, especially in crosses<br />

with Charolaise rams, which presented<br />

the worst results being approved by the<br />

body measurements <strong>of</strong> live animals (Tab.<br />

3). Due to the fat classification, the best<br />

scores (the 2nd and 3rd classes are preferable<br />

at the EU market) were obtained<br />

by the crosses with Charolaise rams and<br />

the worst <strong>–</strong> by pure Polish Merino lambs.<br />

In cases <strong>of</strong> both fat colour and consistency,<br />

TABLE 4. Subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcass quality due to the EUROP classification (n = 49)<br />

Items<br />

Polish<br />

Merino<br />

Genotype<br />

(%) (heads)<br />

Polish Merino Polish Polish Polish Merino<br />

*Berrichon Merino * Merino *Berrichon<br />

du Cher Charolais<br />

du Cher<br />

(B)<br />

(C) (A) (B)<br />

Polish<br />

Merino<br />

*Charolais<br />

(C)<br />

(A)<br />

EUROP class (categories)<br />

E 40 50 46.15 8 8 6<br />

U 55 50 46.15 11 8 6<br />

R 5 0 7.70 1 0 1<br />

O 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

P 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Fat class (categories)<br />

1 10 6.25 0 2 1 0<br />

2 50 26.67 23.08 10 4 3<br />

3 40 68.75 76.92 8 11 10<br />

4 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

5 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Fat colour<br />

Coloured 80 75 69.23 16 12 9<br />

White 20 25 30.77 4 4 4<br />

Fat consistency<br />

Very Cohesive 40 18.75 30.77 8 3 4<br />

Cohesive 60 81.25 69.33 12 13 9<br />

Tender 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Very Tender 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> heads 20 16 13


154 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

all examined carcasses were classified to<br />

the most desired classes <strong>of</strong> carcass quality.<br />

Generally, considering the trade demands,<br />

the carcasses <strong>of</strong> the best meatiness were<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lamb-crosses with Berrichon du<br />

Cher rams, whereas the carcasses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most desired fat classifications were <strong>of</strong><br />

the all examined genotypes, especially <strong>of</strong><br />

lamb-crosses with Charolaise.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> carcass cuts composition<br />

and tissue characteristic <strong>of</strong> leg no statistical<br />

differences were observed between<br />

the genetic groups <strong>of</strong> lambs (Tabs 5 and<br />

6). Some differences were statistically<br />

TABLE 5. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on carcass cuts composition and tissue characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> leg (n = 49)<br />

Effect<br />

Interaction<br />

Items<br />

type month <strong>of</strong> genotype * X S<br />

genotype<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth slaughter type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

Half-carcass (kg) NS NS XX NS 7.83 0.06<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) NS NS XX X 0.18 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%) NS NS NS 2.28 0.09<br />

Foreshank (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.28 0.00<br />

Foreshank (%) NS NS NS 3.58 0.05<br />

Hideshank (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.34 0.00<br />

Hideshank (%) NS NS NS 4.36 0.06<br />

Neck (kg) NS NS X NS 0.59 0.01<br />

Neck (%) NS NS NS 7.54 0.17<br />

Middle neck (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.50 0.01<br />

Middle neck (%) NS NS NS 6.42 0.12<br />

Shoulder (kg) NS NS XX NS 1.33 0.02<br />

Shoulder (%) NS NS NS 16.96 0.15<br />

Breast (kg) NS X XX NS 1.26 0.02<br />

Breast (%) NS X NS 16.04 0.20<br />

Rib back (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.60 0.01<br />

Rib back (%) NS NS NS 7.67 0.13<br />

Loin (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.51 0.01<br />

Loin (%) NS NS NS 6.48 0.12<br />

Tenderloin (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.15 0.00<br />

Tenderloin (%) NS NS NS 1.88 0.05<br />

Leg (kg) NS NS XX NS 2.13 0.02<br />

Leg (%) NS NS NS 27.19 0.19<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS NS XX NS 3.24 0.03<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS NS NS 41.34 0.25<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Lean (kg) NS NS XX NS 1.59 0.02<br />

Lean (%) NS NS NS 75.02 0.53<br />

Fat (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.25 0.01<br />

Fat (%) NS NS NS 11.59 0.33<br />

Bone (kg) NS NS XX NS 0.26 0.00<br />

Bone (%) NS NS NS 12.48 0.19<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes... 155<br />

TABLE 6. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on cuts composition and tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg in ram-lambs (n = 49)<br />

Genotype<br />

Polish Merino Polish Merino*Berrichon<br />

Polish<br />

Items<br />

du Cher<br />

Merino*Charolais<br />

(A)<br />

(B)<br />

(C)<br />

n = 20 n = 16 n = 13<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Half-carcass (kg) 7.70 0.10 7.91 0.11 7.88 0.12<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) 0.16 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.18 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%) 2.18 0.14 2.49 0.15 2.17 0.16<br />

Foreshank (kg) 0.28 0.01 0.28 0.01 0.28 0.01<br />

Foreshank (%) 3.64 0.08 3.53 0.09 3.57 0.10<br />

Hideshank (kg) 0.34 0.01 0.34 0.01 0.34 0.01<br />

Hideshank (%) 0.34 0.01 0.34 0.01 0.34 0.01<br />

Neck (kg) 0.57 0.02 0.60 0.02 0.59 0.03<br />

Neck (%) 7.39 0.27 7.63 0.29 7.61 0.32<br />

Middle neck (kg) 0.49 0.02 0.52 0.02 0.51 0.02<br />

Middle neck (%) 6.34 0.19 6.50 0.20 6.42 0.22<br />

Shoulder (kg) 1.33 0.03 1.34 0.03 1.31 0.03<br />

Shoulder (%) 17.29 0.24 16.94 0.26 16.63 0.29<br />

Breast (kg) 1.21 0.03 1.32 0.03 1.25 0.04<br />

Breast (%) 15.78 0.31 16.59 0.34 15.75 0.37<br />

Rib back (kg) 0.57 0.02 0.63 0.02 0.60 0.03<br />

Rib back (%) 7.42 0.21 7.95 0.23 7.64 0.25<br />

Loin (kg) 0.51 0.02 0.50 0.02 0.51 0.02<br />

Loin (%) 6.64 0.19 6.32 0.20 6.47 0.22<br />

Tenderloin (kg) 0.15 0.01 0.15 0.01 0.14 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%) 1.97 0.08 1.89 0.09 1.78 0.10<br />

Leg (kg) 2.09 0.03 2.14 0.04 2.15 0.04<br />

Leg (%) 27.10 0.30 27.11 0.32 27.37 0.35<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) 3.18 0.06 3.27 0.06 3.26 0.07<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) 41.15 0.40 41.38 0.43 41.47 0.48<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Lean (kg) 1.57 0.03 1.60 0.03 1.61 0.03<br />

Lean (%) 75.01 0.84 74.95 0.91 75.11 1.00<br />

Fat (kg) 0.24 0.01 0.25 0.01 0.25 0.01<br />

Fat (%) 11.69 0.52 11.57 0.56 11.52 0.62<br />

Bone (kg) 0.26 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.27 0.01<br />

Bone (%) 12.39 0.31 12.27 0.33 12.79 0.36<br />

approved due to the traits <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

quality (Tabs 7 and 8), especially due to<br />

the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The lower content<br />

<strong>of</strong> C 16:0 and higher contents <strong>of</strong> C 18:1c9 ,<br />

CLA, C 20:5n3 , MUFA-CIS and PUFAn6<br />

were observed in lamb-crosses with meat<br />

rams comparing to the Polish Merino<br />

lambs, what indicates the significant


156 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 7. Effect <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on physical and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle (n = 49)<br />

Items<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Interaction<br />

genotype type <strong>of</strong> birth genotype*sex<br />

X S<br />

Physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 NS X NS 5.56 0.02<br />

Water holding capacity (cm 2 ) NS NS mld NS 28.89 1.66<br />

Chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> muscle (%)<br />

Dry matter NS NS NS 24.51 0.18<br />

Crude protein NS NS NS 21.06 0.09<br />

Fat NS NS NS 3.12 0.17<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat)<br />

C10:0 NS NS NS 0.19 0.01<br />

C12:0 NS NS NS 0.29 0.03<br />

C14:0 NS NS NS 3.60 0.21<br />

C14:1 NS NS NS 0.22 0.02<br />

C15:0 NS NS NS 0.48 0.03<br />

C15:1 NS NS NS 0.24 0.01<br />

C16:0 X NS NS 24.74 0.30<br />

C16:1 X NS NS 1.80 0.05<br />

C17:0 NS NS NS 1.17 0.02<br />

C17:1 NS NS NS 0.70 0.02<br />

C18:0 NS NS NS 17.64 0.39<br />

C18:1c9 X NS NS 36.61 0.57<br />

C18:2n6 X NS NS 2.96 0.11<br />

C18:3n3 NS NS NS 0.17 0.01<br />

C18:3n3 NS NS NS 0.29 0.01<br />

CLA X NS NS 0.40 0.01<br />

C20:1 NS NS NS 0.18 0.02<br />

C20:3n3 NS NS NS 0.15 0.01<br />

C20:4n6 X NS NS 0.51 0.03<br />

C20:5n3 NS NS NS 0.11 0.02<br />

C22:5n3 NS NS NS 0.19 0.03<br />

C22:6n3 NS NS NS 0.04 0.00<br />

SFA NS NS NS 48.12 0.36<br />

MUFA-CIS XX NS NS 42.27 0.60<br />

MUFA-TRANS NS NS NS 1.70 0.20<br />

PUFAn3 NS NS NS 0.48 0.04<br />

PUFAn6 X NS NS 0.51 0.03<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> meat quality <strong>of</strong> both<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> lamb-crosses comparing to the<br />

Polish Merino. This statement leads to<br />

general conclusion, that the single crossing<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Merino with rams <strong>of</strong><br />

Berrichon du Cher and Charolaise, separately,<br />

indicates the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

meat quality in lamb-crosses, which is<br />

expressed by the more favorable fatty<br />

acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile.


Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes... 157<br />

TABLE 8. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on physical and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle in ram-lambs<br />

(n = 49)<br />

Genotype<br />

Polish Merino<br />

Polish Merino<br />

Polish<br />

Items<br />

*Berrichon du Cher Merino*Charolais<br />

(A)<br />

(B)<br />

(C)<br />

n = 20 n = 16 n = 13<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

Physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 5.57 0.03 5.60 0.03 5.52 0.03<br />

Water holding capacity<br />

(cm 2 ) 27.59 2.63 31.54 2.83 27.53 3.12<br />

Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle (%)<br />

Dry matter 24.66 0.28 24.45 0.30 24.42 0.33<br />

Crude protein 21.06 0.15 21.17 0.16 20.97 0.18<br />

Fat 3.21 0.27 3.22 0.29 2.94 0.32<br />

Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile (g/100g fat)<br />

C10:0 0.19 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.21 0.02<br />

C12:0 0.25 0.05 0.28 0.05 0.34 0.06<br />

C14:0 3.78 0.33 3.27 0.36 3.76 0.39<br />

C14:1 0.26 0.03 0.17 0.03 0.22 0.03<br />

C15:0 0.51 0.05 0.43 0.06 0.50 0.06<br />

C15:1 0.23 0.02 0.22 0.02 0.27 0.02<br />

C16:0 25.95 b,C 0,48 24.36 a 0.51 23.92 A 0,56<br />

C16:1 1.66 c 0.08 1.78 0.08 1.97 a 0.09<br />

C17:0 1.20 0.03 1.15 0.03 1.16 0.03<br />

C17:1 0.66 0.04 0.67 0.04 0.77 0.05<br />

C18:0 17.88 0.62 17.80 0.66 17.26 0.73<br />

C18:1c9 34.41 b,c 0,91 37.74 a 0,98 37.68 a 1,08<br />

C18:2n6 2.57 c 0.17 3.01 0.18 3.30 a 0.20<br />

C18:3n3-t 0.17 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.17 0.01<br />

C18:3n3-c 0.26 0.02 0.31 0.02 0.31 0.02<br />

CLA 0.34 b,c 0,02 0.43 a 0.02 0.44 a 0,03<br />

C20:1 0.20 0.03 0.16 0.03 0.17 0.04<br />

C20:3n3 0.14 0.01 0.16 0.01 0.14 0.02<br />

C20:4n6 0.41 a 0.05 0.61 b 0.06 0.52 0.06<br />

C20:5n3 0.10 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.08 0.05<br />

C22:5n3 0.15 0.04 0.16 0.05 0.25 0.05<br />

C22:6n3 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

SFA 49.76 0.57 47.47 0.62 47.15 0.68<br />

MUFA-CIS 39.52 B,C 0,95 43.52 A 1.02 43.76 A 1,13<br />

MUFA-TRANS 1.43 0.32 2.14 0.34 1.55 0.37<br />

PUFAn3 0.43 0.06 0.52 0.07 0.51 0.07<br />

PUFAn6 0.41 b 0.05 0.61 a 0.06 0.52 0.06<br />

Statistical significance at: a,..., c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; A,..., C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


158 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The overall characteristic <strong>of</strong> body measurements<br />

leads to the general statement,<br />

that the single crossing <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino<br />

ewes with rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds<br />

influence shorter legs and shorter heads,<br />

longer body and thinner chest, when the<br />

Charolaise rams were used, as well as<br />

causes thinner limbs when the Berrichon<br />

du Cher rams were used in crossing.<br />

Therefore, the diversification <strong>of</strong> body<br />

structure was reported. Such significant<br />

differences were not observed in case <strong>of</strong><br />

slaughter value and carcass measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs.<br />

Generally, due to the carcass quality<br />

considering the trade demands, the carcasses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the best meatiness were <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lamb-crosses with Berrichon du Cher<br />

rams, whereas the carcasses <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

desired fat classifications were <strong>of</strong> the all<br />

examined genotypes, especially <strong>of</strong> lamb-<br />

-crosses with Charolaise.<br />

The single crossing <strong>of</strong> Polish Merino<br />

with rams <strong>of</strong> Berrichon du Cher and<br />

Charolaise, showed the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

meat quality in their lamb-crosses, which<br />

was expressed by the more advantageous<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> fatty acids.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA.<br />

AOAC, 1990: Association <strong>of</strong> Official Chemist.<br />

Food Composition Additives Natural Contaminants.<br />

GRUSZECKI T., JUNKUSZEW A., LIPECKA<br />

C., KAMIŃSKA A., SZYMANOWSKA A.,<br />

PATKOWSKI K., 2004: Fatty acids composition<br />

in sheep milk and muscle tissue <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

fed with protective fat-supplemented fodder.<br />

Arch. Tierz., Dummersdorf 47, Special Issue:<br />

183<strong>–</strong>188.<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 2001: Wybrane aspekty produkcji<br />

jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

zlokalizowanego na glebach lekkich, Rozprawa<br />

doktorska wykonana w Zakładzie Hodowli<br />

Owiec i Kóz <strong>SGGW</strong> w Warszawie (maszynopis).<br />

NAWARA W., OSIKOWSKI M., KLUZ I., MO-<br />

DELSKA M., 1963: Wycena tryków na podstawie<br />

badania wartości potomstwa w stacjach<br />

oceny tryków Instytutu Zootechniki za rok<br />

1962. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1979: Próba charakterystyki<br />

budowy jagniąt w typie merynolinkolna<br />

w związku z użytkowością mięsną tej owcy.<br />

Zesz. Nauk. <strong>SGGW</strong>-AR. Zoot. 15: 25<strong>–</strong>40.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 1995: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 55547 92/C/569 pt.:<br />

„Intensyfikacja produkcji oraz poprawa jakości<br />

tusz jagnięcych owiec nizinnych hodowanych<br />

w Polsce Centralnej”, Komitet Badań Naukowych,<br />

Warszawa (maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., GLIŃSKI M.,<br />

JAGIEŁŁO M., 1998: Sprawozdanie końcowe<br />

z grantu celowego nr 5 P06E 001 95C/2470 pt.:<br />

„Produkcja jagniąt rzeźnych w warunkach gospodarstwa<br />

rolniczego położonego na glebach<br />

lekkich”, Komitet Badań Naukowych, Warszawa<br />

(maszynopis).<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., JAGIEŁŁO M.,<br />

GLIŃSKI M., 2001: Tempo wzrostu i wartość<br />

rzeźna jagniąt mieszańców rasy berrichon<br />

z wrzosówką i owcą żelaźnieńską. Pr. i Mater.<br />

Zoot. 58, 115<strong>–</strong>124.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN<br />

K., 1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym.<br />

Instytut Zootechniki Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

PN-EN ISO 5508: Oleje i tłuszcze roślinne oraz<br />

zwierzęce. Analiza estrów metylowych kwasów<br />

tłuszczowych metodą chromatografii gazowej,<br />

1996.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ krzyżowania owiec rasy merynos<br />

polski z trykami ras mięsnych na wartość<br />

rzeźną i mięsną ich potomstwa. Badania przeprowadzono<br />

w 2008 roku w stadzie w Żydowie. Materiał<br />

badawczy składał się z 49 jagniąt-tryczków<br />

pochodzących z następujących grup: merynos<br />

polski (MP.) oraz jego mieszańce F 1 po trykach


Effect <strong>of</strong> rams <strong>of</strong> meat sheep breeds used in crossing schemes... 159<br />

charolaise i berrichon du cher. Jagnięta utrzymywano<br />

w masywnych budynkach, żywienie stosowano<br />

według norm, przy wykorzystaniu pasz gospodarskich<br />

(zielonka, kiszonka, siano susz) i pasz<br />

treściwych własnej produkcji. Po osiągnięciu masy<br />

ciała 35 kg (dopuszczając wahania rzędu +1,5 kg),<br />

przed ubojem wykonano na żywych zwierzętach<br />

pomiary zoometryczne, a po uboju <strong>–</strong> pełną analizę<br />

rzeźną wraz z oceną jakości mięsa. Ogólna<br />

charakterystyka pomiarów zoometrycznych prowadzi<br />

do uogólnienia, że krzyżowanie towarowe<br />

rasy merynos polski z trykami ras mięsnych prowadzi<br />

do skrócenia długości nóg i głowy u mieszańców,<br />

wydłużenia ciała i zwężenia klatki piersiowej<br />

u mieszańców po trykach charolaise oraz<br />

zmniejszenia grubości kończyn u mieszańców po<br />

trykach rasy berrichon du cher, czyli zróżnicowania<br />

w zakresie budowy zwierząt. Natomiast nie<br />

wykazano różnic pomiędzy grupami w zakresie<br />

wartości rzeźnej i pomiarów tuszy. Pod względem<br />

jakości tusz najlepszym umięśnieniem ze<br />

względu na wymagania handlowe charakteryzowały<br />

się mieszańce po trykach berrichon du cher<br />

a najkorzystniejszą oceną w zakresie otłuszczenia<br />

wszystkie mieszańce po trykach ras mięsnych ze<br />

szczególnym podkreśleniem wysokiej wartości<br />

tusz uzyskanych po rasie charolaise. Krzyżowanie<br />

towarowe merynosa polskiego z trykami ras mięsnych<br />

berrichon du cher i charolaise prowadziło do<br />

poprawy wartości handlowej i jakości mięsa u ich<br />

potomstwa wyrażającego się korzystniejszym pr<strong>of</strong>ilem<br />

kwasów tłuszczowych.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Dominik Popielarczyk, Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Artur Oprządek<br />

Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych <strong>–</strong> ANR<br />

ul. Dolańskiego 2, 00-215 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Beata Kuczyńska<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Bydła<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 161<strong>–</strong>175<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat carcasses designed<br />

for national market<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI 1 , EWA STRZELEC 1 , KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ 1 ,<br />

DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK 1 , BEATA KUCZYŃSKA 2<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat<br />

carcasses designed for national market. The research<br />

was carried out on male lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska<br />

(n = 10) and Polish Heath Sheep (n = 10) breeds as<br />

well as on the male kids <strong>of</strong> the Boer goat (n = 9),<br />

which were fattened till the slaughter weight <strong>of</strong><br />

35 kg. Growth development, slaughter value,<br />

carcass quality and tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg as<br />

well as physical and chemical traits, including the<br />

fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile, <strong>of</strong> mld muscle were estimated.<br />

The results indicated that Żelaźnieńska lambs expressed<br />

the most desired values <strong>of</strong> all traits than<br />

the Boer kids. The carcasses <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath<br />

Sheep male lambs were slightly worse than the<br />

carcasses <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska male lambs, whereas<br />

being much higher in this respect that the Boer<br />

male kids’ carcasses. The analysis <strong>of</strong> physical and<br />

chemical traits (including the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile)<br />

<strong>of</strong> mld muscle indicated the total distinguishing<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath Sheep male rams<br />

than both Żelaźnieńska male lambs and the Boer<br />

goat male kids. Moreover, the physical and chemical<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld muscle in the Boer goat<br />

male kids was similar to the results obtained for<br />

the Żelaźnieńska male lambs.<br />

Key words: sheep, goats, extensive breeding,<br />

slaughter value, classification, carcass quality.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> making the agriculture<br />

production more extensive as well as<br />

limited financing capability <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />

lead very <strong>of</strong>ten to stop the intensive production<br />

on some rural areas. The plants<br />

which raised on such abandoned areas<br />

may be used as the fodder and they may<br />

be pastured by small ruminants which<br />

are able to manage such extensive production<br />

conditions in the aim to obtain<br />

the slaughter lambs (Groberek et al.,<br />

2003abc; Groberek, Niżnikowski, 2003).<br />

Several scientists (Antczak et al., 2002;<br />

Niżnikowski et al., 2002abcde) reported<br />

also about some aspects how to organize<br />

the sheep production under extensive<br />

farming and they limited their studies<br />

to the supplying <strong>of</strong> the national niche<br />

market. Due to the abovementioned facts,<br />

the attempt to estimate the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

carcasses <strong>of</strong> male-lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska<br />

and Polish Heath Sheep breeds as well<br />

as the male kids <strong>of</strong> the Boer goats was<br />

undertaken, while the animals were bred<br />

under the extensive conditions. Moreover,<br />

the analysis <strong>of</strong> meat quality was also in<br />

the interest <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> growth development and live<br />

body weight at slaughter. The research<br />

was carried out on the Research Farm<br />

owned by the Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and


162 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

Goat Breeding in 2007. The animals were<br />

chosen basing on the breeding books.<br />

The male lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska (n = 10)<br />

and Polish Heath Sheep (n = 10) breeds<br />

as well as male kids <strong>of</strong> the Boer goats<br />

(n = 9) were born in 2007 as singles,<br />

twins and quadruplets. The animals were<br />

bred in half-open light buildings and the<br />

feeding was adjusted to the norms (Osikowski<br />

et al., 1993). The feeding was<br />

based on self-produced fodders (fodder,<br />

silage, hay, dehydrated forage) as well as<br />

the self-made concentrates). The fallowing<br />

items were estimated: body weight<br />

at birth, body weight at age <strong>of</strong> 56 days,<br />

age at slaughter (fattening period), daily<br />

gains till 56 day <strong>of</strong> life and daily gain till<br />

the age at slaughter.<br />

Statistical calculations were done using<br />

the LSM analysis (ANON., 2004) in the<br />

SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware for Windows v. 12.0 estimating<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong>: genotype and type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth and double-factor interaction:<br />

genotype × type <strong>of</strong> birth. Moreover, the<br />

correction factor in the regression model<br />

<strong>of</strong> body weight at slaughter was also<br />

applied. While the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on<br />

the researched traits was observed, the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the differences between<br />

factor levels were checked out with F-test<br />

(Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> slaughter value, carcass<br />

quality and meat quality <strong>of</strong> male lambs<br />

and kids. When the lambs achieved the<br />

slaughter weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg (±1.5 kg), the<br />

lambs were slaughtered and the carcasses<br />

were chilled in 4°C throughout 24 hours.<br />

The following items were estimated:<br />

I. Slaughter traits: age at slaughter, gross<br />

dressing percentage, weight <strong>of</strong> carcass<br />

and weight <strong>of</strong> skin (Nawara et<br />

al., 1963).<br />

II. Carcass quality due to the EUROP<br />

classification: conformation class<br />

(E, U, R, O, P), fat class (1 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

lowest fat content, 2, 3, 4, 5 <strong>–</strong> the<br />

highest fat content), fat consistency<br />

(very cohesive, cohesive, tender,<br />

very tender) and fat colour (white or<br />

coloured).<br />

III. Carcass measurements: length and<br />

round <strong>of</strong> foreshrank (Niżnikowski,<br />

1977), spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint, depth <strong>of</strong><br />

leg, length <strong>of</strong> leg, round <strong>of</strong> leg, leg<br />

index (round <strong>of</strong> leg/ length <strong>of</strong> leg ×<br />

100), loin eye area, fat cover over<br />

loin eye (Nawara et al., 1963).<br />

IV. Carcass cuts composition (Nawara<br />

et al., 1963): kidney with fat, both<br />

shanks (front and hind), shoulder,<br />

neck, middle neck, rib back, loin, leg,<br />

breast and the valuable cuts (leg, rib<br />

back, loin and tenderloin).<br />

V. Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg: lean, bone<br />

and fat (Nawara et al., 1963).<br />

VI. Physical and chemical characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> raw mld muscle: the pH-24<br />

value as well as the water holding<br />

capacity, protein, fat and dry matter<br />

content (AOAC, 1990).<br />

VII. Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the intramuscular<br />

fat <strong>of</strong> mld muscle. The fat<br />

extraction was prepared due to the<br />

Röse-Gottlieb method (AOAC,<br />

1990). Fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile composition<br />

was determined with the gas<br />

chromatography due to the norms<br />

PN-EN ISO 5508 (1996).<br />

Statistical calculations were done<br />

using the LSM analysis in the SPSS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware for Windows v. 12.0 (ANON.,<br />

2004) estimating the effects <strong>of</strong>: genotype<br />

and type <strong>of</strong> birth and interaction:<br />

genotype × type <strong>of</strong> birth. Moreover, the<br />

correction factor in the regression model


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 163<br />

<strong>of</strong> body weight at slaughter was also<br />

applied. While the effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on<br />

the researched traits was observed, the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> the differences between<br />

factor levels were checked out with F-test<br />

(Ruszczyc, 1981). The traits mentioned<br />

in the II point are shown in Table.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The result due to the factors affecting the<br />

growth development were presented in<br />

Table 1. The genotype <strong>of</strong> animals affected<br />

all examined traits at the all statistically<br />

significant levels (p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.05).<br />

Moreover, the type <strong>of</strong> birth affected the<br />

age at slaughter as well as the daily gain<br />

till the slaughter. The descriptive analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> these traits was shown in Table 2,<br />

which indicated that the Żelaźnieńska<br />

male lambs presented the shortest fattening<br />

period and the highest daily gain<br />

during this time than the Polish Heath<br />

Sheep male lambs. The male kids <strong>of</strong><br />

Boer goats did not differ statistically in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> these traits from the male lambs<br />

TABLE 1. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on fattening parameters in sheep and goats (n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Iteraction<br />

genotype type <strong>of</strong> birth genotype*type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

x S<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening (kg) X X NS 243.58 6.13<br />

Weight at birth (kg) XX X X 3.74 0.16<br />

Daily gain till 56 day (kg) XX NS NS 0.23 0.02<br />

Weight at 56 day (kg) XX X X 13.51 0.87<br />

Live weight gain (g/day) X X NS 0.16 0.01<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> not significant<br />

TABLE 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> species and breed on growth development parameters (n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Days <strong>of</strong> fattening (kg)<br />

Daily gain till 56 day<br />

(kg)<br />

Live weight gain<br />

(g/day)<br />

Weight at birth (kg)<br />

Weight at 56 day (kg)<br />

Species<br />

Boer Goat (A) Polish Heat Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

LSM 243.67 266.40 232.04<br />

SE 10.61 8.13 8.30<br />

* B B<br />

LSM 0.15 0.20 0.37<br />

SE 0.04 0.03 0.03<br />

* A B A,B<br />

LSM 0.16 0.14 0.16<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

* b b<br />

LSM 2.88 2.92 5.40<br />

SE 0.02 0.19 0.19<br />

* A B A,B<br />

LSM 9.64 12.60 18.40<br />

SE 1.03 0.96 0.98<br />

* A,a a,C A,C<br />

*<strong>–</strong> Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at: a, b, c <strong>–</strong> P < 0.05; A, B, C <strong>–</strong> P < 0.01


164 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

<strong>of</strong> both breeds and reached the place<br />

between them due to these results. The<br />

fact <strong>of</strong> high daily gain in Żelaźnieńska<br />

male lambs is worthy to notice, which<br />

was definitely higher (p ≤ 0.01) than the<br />

other groups. Such tendencies were also<br />

reported by Niżnikowski et al. (2002bd)<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> these sheep breeds. The most<br />

beneficial growth parameters were observed<br />

in Żelaźnieńska Sheep, the lowest<br />

<strong>–</strong> in Polish Heath Sheep and at the Boer<br />

goat placed between these two sheep<br />

breeds.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> subjective estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

carcass quality were presented in Table 3.<br />

The Żelaźnieńska Sheep were also better<br />

than the other groups <strong>of</strong> examined animals.<br />

All carcasses belonged to the categories<br />

from E to R, what means that they<br />

easily fulfill the requirements <strong>of</strong> the UE<br />

market. The carcasses <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath<br />

Sheep were estimated a little lower,<br />

because 2 <strong>of</strong> them obtained the O category<br />

(processing) and none <strong>of</strong> the carcasses<br />

belonged to the E category. The Boer<br />

goats obtained the worst results: only two<br />

carcasses were classified as R (trade),<br />

whereas the others were classified to the<br />

O and P categories (processing).<br />

The results due to the fat class <strong>of</strong> carcasses<br />

also indicated the Żelaźnieńska<br />

breed as the best among all examined<br />

groups (the best fat class <strong>of</strong> carcasses is<br />

2nd and then the 3rd). All male lambs<br />

<strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska breed were classified to<br />

the 2nd and 3rd classes. Similar results<br />

TABLE 3. Distribution <strong>of</strong> carcasses <strong>of</strong> male-lambs and male-kids (heads) due to the EUROP classification<br />

(n = 29)<br />

Items:<br />

Species<br />

EUROP class (categories) Boer Goat (A) Polish Heat Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

E<br />

U<br />

R<br />

O<br />

P<br />

0<br />

0<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

5<br />

3<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

5<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Fatness (categories)<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

6<br />

4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Colour <strong>of</strong> fat<br />

coloured<br />

white<br />

4<br />

5<br />

8<br />

2<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Fat consistency<br />

very cohesive<br />

cohensive<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

very s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

0<br />

2<br />

7<br />

0<br />

2<br />

8<br />

0<br />

0<br />

4<br />

6<br />

0<br />

0


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 165<br />

were obtained in Polish Heath Sheep<br />

lambs (only one carcass was classified to<br />

the 1st class), whereas the worst results<br />

were presented again by the Boer goat<br />

male kids (five carcasses ere classified to<br />

the 1st class and the others <strong>–</strong> to the 2nd).<br />

These observations indicated that carcasses<br />

obtained from male lambs <strong>of</strong> both<br />

sheep breeds at slaughter weight <strong>of</strong> 35 kg<br />

were similar, whereas the Boer goat male<br />

kids’ carcasses expressed very low level<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat cover. The results <strong>of</strong> the estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> fat colour differed due to the species.<br />

The fat cover on carcasses <strong>of</strong> male<br />

lambs were <strong>of</strong> the white colour, whereas<br />

in the male-kids the colour fat cover was<br />

observed in half <strong>of</strong> the group. Also, the<br />

consistency <strong>of</strong> fat appeared to be more<br />

cohesive in male lambs than in the male<br />

kids. The results <strong>of</strong> general classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcasses indicated higher value in<br />

male lambs (especially in Żelaźnieńska<br />

sheep) than in the male kids. The Polish<br />

Heath Sheep male lambs presented<br />

slightly lower values comparing to these<br />

obtained for Żelaźnieńska male lambs.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> examined factors and<br />

interaction on the carcass measurements,<br />

slaughter value and carcass quality <strong>of</strong><br />

male lambs and male kids slaughtered<br />

at 35 kg <strong>of</strong> live body weight were presented<br />

in Table 4. The genotype affected<br />

most <strong>of</strong> examined traits. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

genotype on the slaughter value as well<br />

as on the carcass measurements was statistically<br />

significant (p ≤ 0.01) in case <strong>of</strong>:<br />

spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint, index <strong>of</strong> leg and fat<br />

cover over loin eye. Accordingly to the<br />

traits <strong>of</strong> carcass cuts and tissue composition<br />

the genotype affected the weight <strong>of</strong><br />

foreshank (kg), weights <strong>of</strong> neck, middle<br />

neck and shoulder (kg, %), weight <strong>of</strong><br />

loin, leg and valuable cuts (%). The type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth affected only the weight <strong>of</strong> neck<br />

(%), whereas the interaction (genotype<br />

× type <strong>of</strong> birth) was observed due to<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> foreshank (kg, %), weights <strong>of</strong><br />

neck, middle neck and valuable cuts (%)<br />

as well as the bone content in leg (%).<br />

The observed effect <strong>of</strong> genotype was<br />

similar to the results presented in other<br />

studies, whereas the lack <strong>of</strong> the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong> birth was incompatible to the<br />

results reported by other authors, and it<br />

may be connected with the specific environmental<br />

conditions in Żelazna in 2007<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 2002bd).<br />

The estimation <strong>of</strong> differences between<br />

species and breeds due to the carcass<br />

measurements, slaughter value and carcass<br />

quality traits was presented in Table<br />

5. The Polish Heath Sheep male lambs<br />

indicated the smallest spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint<br />

comparing to both the Żelaźnieńska male<br />

lambs and Boer goat male kids, which<br />

did not presented differences within this<br />

trait. The opposite trend was observed<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> the loin eye area at the first<br />

time and it was not reported in previous<br />

studies (Niżnikowski et al., 2002bd) and<br />

needs to be examined further. The fat<br />

cover over loin eye was the smallest in<br />

the Boer goat male kids comparing to<br />

male lambs <strong>of</strong> both breeds and approved<br />

the lowest level <strong>of</strong> carcass fattiness (see<br />

Tab. 3). On the other hand, the worst<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the index <strong>of</strong> leg was observed<br />

in Boer goat male kids comparing to the<br />

male lambs <strong>of</strong> both breeds, which both<br />

presented similar results. Due to the carcass<br />

cuts’ composition, the lowest weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> foreshank (kg) was observed in Polish<br />

Heath Sheep male lambs comparing<br />

to the statistically higher values <strong>of</strong> this<br />

traits in Żelaźnieńska sheep (p ≤ 0.05)<br />

and non-significantly higher values in the


166 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 4. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on carcass cuts composition and tissue characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> leg in male-lambs and male-kids (n = 29)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Iteraction<br />

Traits<br />

genotype<br />

type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth<br />

body weight<br />

at slaughter<br />

genotype*<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

x S<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong> skin (kg) NS NS NS NS 3.53 0.32<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong> carcass (kg) NS NS XX NS 14.45 0.20<br />

Dressing percentage (%) NS NS NS NS 42.8 0.48<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint (cm) XX NS NS NS 3.31 0.04<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS X XX 20.74 0.36<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS NS NS 25.91 0.22<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm) NS NS X NS 35.40 0.36<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%) X NS NS NS 137.47 1.93<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 ) X NS NS NS 13.65 0.67<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> loin eye area (cm) NS NS NS NS 5.25 0.09<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> loin eye area (cm) NS NS NS NS 2.94 0.08<br />

Fat over loin eye area (mm) X NS NS NS 0.58 0.05<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Half carcass (kg) NS NS XX NS 7.23 0.12<br />

Kidney with fat (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.13 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%) NS NS NS 1.75 0.11<br />

Foreshank (kg) XX NS NS X 0.27 0.01<br />

Foreshank (%) NS NS X 3.61 0.11<br />

Hideshank (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.30 0.02<br />

Hideshank (%) NS NS NS 4.20 0.19<br />

Neck (kg) XX NS XX NS 0.74 0.03<br />

Neck (%) X X X 10.32 0.30<br />

Middle neck (kg) XX NS NS NS 0.52 0.02<br />

Middle neck (%) XX NS X 7.23 0.20<br />

Shoulder (kg) XX NS NS NS 1.28 0.02<br />

Shoulder (%) XX NS NS 17.58 0.28<br />

Breast (kg) NS NS XX NS 1.16 0.03<br />

Breast (%) NS NS NS 16.20 0.33<br />

Rib back (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.54 0.01<br />

Rib back (%) NS NS NS 7.37 0.16<br />

Loin (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.44 0.02<br />

Loin (%) XX NS NS 6.02 0.17<br />

Tenderloin (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.11 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%) NS NS NS 1.49 0.08<br />

Leg (kg) NS NS XX NS 1.80 0.04<br />

Leg (%) X NS NS 24.85 0.29<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) NS NS X NS 2.77 0.05<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) XX NS X 38.24 0.33


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 167<br />

Table 4. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg<br />

Meat (kg) NS NS X NS 1.37 0.03<br />

Meat (%) NS NS NS 75.93 0.57<br />

Fat (kg) NS NS NS NS 0.19 0.01<br />

Fat (%) NS NS NS 10.90 0.53<br />

Bones (kg) NS NS XX XX 0.23 0.01<br />

Bones (%) NS NS NS 12.83 0.40<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> not significant<br />

TABLE 5. Effect <strong>of</strong> species and breed on slaughter value traits and tissue composition <strong>of</strong> leg in small<br />

ruminants (n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Species<br />

Boer Goat (A) Polish Heat Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Fattening and slaughter traits<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong> pelt (kg)<br />

LSM 3.34 4.18 3.48<br />

SE 0.53 0.49 0.66<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong> carcass (kg)<br />

LSM 14.97 14.66 13.57<br />

SE 0.33 0.30 0.42<br />

Carcass measurements<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> hock joint<br />

(cm)<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> leg (cm)<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> leg (cm)<br />

Round <strong>of</strong> leg (cm)<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> leg (%)<br />

Loin eye area (cm 2 )<br />

Spread <strong>of</strong> the loin eye<br />

(cm)<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> the loin eye<br />

(cm)<br />

Fat cover over loin eye<br />

(mm)<br />

LSM 3.32 3.01 3.43<br />

SE 0.06 0.06 0.08<br />

* A A,B B<br />

LSM 20.47 22.19 20.40<br />

SE 0.61 0.56 0.76<br />

LSM 26.59 25.73 24.98<br />

SE 0.37 0.34 0.46<br />

LSM 35.02 36.45 35.45<br />

SE 0.61 0.55 0.76<br />

LSM 131.19 140.01 145.62<br />

SE 3.34 2.56 2.61<br />

* A,a a A<br />

LSM 13.24 17.48 12.36<br />

SE 1.12 1.03 1.40<br />

* A A,b b<br />

LSM 5.44 5.26 4.96<br />

SE 0.15 0.14 0.19<br />

LSM 2.74 3.15 3.14<br />

SE 0.14 0.13 0.17<br />

LSM 0.39 0.76 0.79<br />

SE 0.09 0.08 0.12<br />

* A,a A a


168 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

Table 5. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Half-carcass cuts composition<br />

Weight <strong>of</strong> half carcass LSM 7.51 7.32 6.75<br />

(kg)<br />

SE 0.20 0.18 0.25<br />

Kidney with fat (kg)<br />

LSM 0.12 0.11 0.14<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

Kidney with fat (%)<br />

LSM 1.62 1.58 2.04<br />

SE 0.19 0.14 0.14<br />

LSM 0.26 0.23 0.29<br />

Foreshank (kg)<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

* b b<br />

Foreshank (%)<br />

LSM 3.58 3.46 3.74<br />

SE 0.18 0.14 0.14<br />

Hideshank ( kg)<br />

LSM 0.30 0.29 0.32<br />

SE 0.03 0.02 0.03<br />

Hideshank (%)<br />

LSM 3.95 3.94 4.71<br />

SE 0.33 0.26 0.26<br />

LSM 0.84 0.78 0.57<br />

Neck (kg)<br />

SE 0.04 0.04 0.06<br />

* A b A,b<br />

LSM 10.99 10.21 9.38<br />

Neck (%)<br />

SE 0.53 0.40 0.41<br />

* a a<br />

LSM 0.57 0.58 0.43<br />

Middle neck (kg) SE 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

* A B A,B<br />

LSM 7.55 8.10 6.31<br />

Middle neck (%)<br />

SE 0.34 0.26 0.27<br />

* A B A,B<br />

LSM 1.38 1.18 1.19<br />

Shoulder (kg)<br />

SE 0.04 0.04 0.05<br />

* A,a A a<br />

LSM 18.62 16.65 16.49<br />

Shoulder (%)<br />

SE 0.48 0.37 0.37<br />

* A A A<br />

Breast (kg)<br />

LSM 1.23 1.22 1.01<br />

SE 0.05 0.05 0.07<br />

Breast (%)<br />

LSM 16.22 15.91 16.31<br />

SE 0.57 0.44 0.45<br />

Rib back (kg)<br />

LSM 0.54 0.53 0.53<br />

SE 0.02 0.02 0.03<br />

Rib back (%)<br />

LSM 7.29 7.36 7.50<br />

SE 0.28 0.22 0.22


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 169<br />

Table 5. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Loin (kg)<br />

LSM 0.40 0.46 0.49<br />

SE 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

LSM 5.35 6.50 6.78<br />

Loin (%)<br />

SE 0.30 0.23 0.23<br />

* A A A<br />

Tenderloin (kg)<br />

LSM 0.11 0.11 0.10<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

Tenderloin (%)<br />

LSM 1.52 1.42 1.49<br />

SE 0.13 0.10 0.10<br />

Leg (kg)<br />

LSM 1.80 1.89 1.74<br />

SE 0.07 0.06 0.08<br />

LSM 23.96 26.01 25.59<br />

Loin (kg)<br />

SE 0.50 0.38 0.39<br />

* A,a A a<br />

Valuable cuts (kg)<br />

LSM 2.74 2.88 2.76<br />

SE 0.09 0.08 0.12<br />

LSM 36.60 39.87 39.88<br />

Valuable cuts (kg) SE 0.57 0.43 0.44<br />

* A A A<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> leg dissection<br />

Meat (kg)<br />

LSM 1.36 1.46 1.32<br />

SE 0.05 0.05 0.07<br />

Meat (%)<br />

LSM 75.91 77.28 75.28<br />

SE 0.98 0.75 0.77<br />

Fat (kg)<br />

LSM 0.19 0.18 0.21<br />

SE 0.02 0.02 0.02<br />

Fat (%)<br />

LSM 10.39 9.48 12.38<br />

SE 0.91 0.70 0.71<br />

Bones (kg)<br />

LSM 0.23 0.24 0.21<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.02<br />

Bones (%)<br />

LSM 12.68 11.90 13.54<br />

SE 0.69 0.53 0.54<br />

*<strong>–</strong> Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at: a, b, c <strong>–</strong> P < 0.05; A, B, C <strong>–</strong> P < 0.01<br />

Boer goat, the lowest values <strong>of</strong> weights<br />

<strong>of</strong>: neck (kg, %), middle neck (kg, %) and<br />

shoulder (kg, %) and the highest values<br />

<strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong>: loin (%), leg (%) and valuable<br />

parts (%) in Żelaźnieńska male<br />

lambs comparing to the Boer goat male<br />

kids and in small range to the Polish<br />

Heath Sheep male lambs (weights <strong>of</strong><br />

shoulder, loin and leg as well as valuable<br />

cuts). The results lead to the observation<br />

that the most favorable content <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />

cuts was observed in Żelaźnieńska<br />

male lambs comparing to the Boer goat<br />

male kids and the light edge over the<br />

Polish Heath Sheep male lambs, which<br />

presented the higher values <strong>of</strong> weights


170 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

<strong>of</strong> cuts <strong>of</strong> low value comparing to the<br />

Żelaźnieńska male lambs and definitely<br />

lower values than the Boer goat male<br />

kids. No statistically approved differences<br />

between groups <strong>of</strong> male lambs and<br />

kids were observed in case <strong>of</strong> the tissue<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> leg.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction<br />

on the traits <strong>of</strong> physical and chemical<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> mld muscle were<br />

presented in Table 6. The genotype affected<br />

statistically (p ≤ 0.05) the fat content,<br />

whereas the type <strong>of</strong> birth affected the<br />

pH-24 value. No statistically significant<br />

interaction was observed in all traits. The<br />

differences between species and breeds <strong>of</strong><br />

examined animals were shown in Table<br />

7. The fat content in mld muscle appeared<br />

to be at higher level in the Boer goat male<br />

kids than in the Polish Heath Sheep male<br />

lambs. The male lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska<br />

Sheep presented non-statistically significant<br />

fat content at the level in the middle<br />

between the other groups.<br />

TABLE 6. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on physical and chemical characteristic <strong>of</strong> mld<br />

muscle in sheep and goats (n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Iteraction<br />

genotype type <strong>of</strong> birth genotype*type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

x S<br />

Physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

pH 24 NS X NS 5.60 0.02<br />

Water holding capacity (cm 2 ) NS NS NS 16.45 1.99<br />

Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> mld muscle ( %)<br />

Dry matter NS NS NS 25.92 0.48<br />

Protein NS NS NS 21.27 0.16<br />

Fat X NS NS 3.97 0.28<br />

Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> not significant<br />

TABLE 7. Effect <strong>of</strong> species and breeds on physical and chemical uality <strong>of</strong> mld muscle (n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Species<br />

Boer Goat (A) Polish Heat Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

Physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> mld muscle<br />

LSM 5.64 5.57 5.54<br />

pH 24<br />

SE 0.03 0.02 0.02<br />

Water holding capacity LSM 12.91 17.61 21.19<br />

(cm 2 )<br />

SE 3.44 2.63 2.69<br />

Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> mld muscle (%)<br />

Dry matter<br />

LSM 26.52 25.04 25.48<br />

SE 0.83 0.64 0.65<br />

Protein<br />

LSM 21.16 21.94 21.11<br />

SE 0.27 0.21 0.21<br />

LSM 4.55 2.79 3.68<br />

Fat<br />

SE 0.49 0.37 0.38<br />

* A A<br />

*<strong>–</strong> Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at A, B, C <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 171<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> variation sources on the<br />

fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile in mld muscle were presented<br />

in Table 8. The genotype affected<br />

statistically (p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01) the<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> fallowing fatty acids: C12:0,<br />

C14:0, C16:1, C18:0, C18:2n6, CLA,<br />

C20:5n3 and C22:6n3, whereas the type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth affected (p ≤ 0.01) the amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, SFA and the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> SFA. The effect <strong>of</strong> double-<br />

-factor interaction (genotype × type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth) was observed on the level <strong>of</strong> C14:0,<br />

C16:0, C18:0, SFA and the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> SFA. The small amount <strong>of</strong> effects on<br />

the separate fatty acids was compatible<br />

to the results reported by other authors<br />

(Gruszecki et al., 2004). The differences<br />

between levels <strong>of</strong> fatty acids (Tab. 9)<br />

between the experimental groups lead to<br />

observation, that the Polish Heath Sheep<br />

TABLE 8. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interaction on the fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile in mld muscle in sheep<br />

and goats (n = 29)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Iteraction<br />

Traits<br />

genotype* x<br />

S<br />

genotype type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

C10:0 NS NS NS 0.15 0.02<br />

C12:0 X NS NS 0.21 0.03<br />

C14:0 X XX XX 2.50 0.11<br />

C14:1 NS NS NS 0.28 0.03<br />

C15:0 NS NS NS 0.49 0.03<br />

C15:1 NS NS NS 0.18 0.02<br />

C16:0 NS NS XX 22.81 0.38<br />

C16:1 XX NS NS 1.94 0.08<br />

C17:0 NS NS NS 1.64 0.12<br />

C17:1 NS NS NS 1.14 0.10<br />

C18:0 X XX XX 18.34 0.56<br />

C18:1c9 NS NS NS 36.28 1.98<br />

C18:2n6 XX NS NS 2.53 0.23<br />

C18:3n3c NS NS NS 0.19 0.01<br />

C18:3n3t NS NS NS 0.26 0.02<br />

CLA X NS NS 0.25 0.02<br />

C20:1 NS NS NS 0.13 0.01<br />

C20:3n3 NS NS NS 0.11 0.01<br />

C20:4n6 NS NS NS 0.50 0.08<br />

C20:5n3 X NS NS 0.06 0.01<br />

C22:5n3 NS NS NS 0.18 0.07<br />

C22:6n3 X NS NS 0.04 0.00<br />

SFA NS XX XX 46.14 0.82<br />

MUFA-CIS NS NS NS 41.42 1.99<br />

MUFA-TRANS NS NS NS 1.51 0.11<br />

PUFA n3 NS NS NS 0.40 0.08<br />

PUFA n6 NS NS NS 0.50 0.08<br />

Differences at: X <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> P ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> not significant


172 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

TABLE 9. Effect <strong>of</strong> species and breeds on fatty acids pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> mld muscle in small ruminants<br />

(n = 29)<br />

Traits<br />

Species<br />

Boer Goat (A) Polish Heat Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

C10:0<br />

LSM 0.17 0.12 0.12<br />

SE 0.03 0.02 0.03<br />

C12:0<br />

LSM 0.27 0.15 0.16<br />

SE 0.05 0.04 0.04<br />

C14:0<br />

LSM 2.70 2.32 2.30<br />

SE 0.19 0.15 0.15<br />

C14:1<br />

LSM 0.33 0.21 0.23<br />

SE 0.06 0.05 0.05<br />

C15:0<br />

LSM 0.54 0.46 0.42<br />

SE 0.06 0.05 0.05<br />

C15:1<br />

LSM 0.21 0.14 0.15<br />

SE 0.03 0.02 0.03<br />

C16:0<br />

LSM 22.67 22.03 23.40<br />

SE 0.65 0.50 0.51<br />

C16:1<br />

LSM 2.28 1.97 1.42<br />

SE 0.15 0.11 0.11<br />

C17:0<br />

LSM 1.67 1.62 1.60<br />

SE 0.21 0.16 0.16<br />

C17:1<br />

LSM 1.30 1.17 0.88<br />

SE 0.17 0.13 0.14<br />

LSM 17.97 14.46 20.85<br />

C18:0<br />

SE 0.96 0.74 0.75<br />

* A,a A,B a,B<br />

C18:1c9<br />

LSM 33.31 41.49 38.13<br />

SE 3.42 2.62 2.68<br />

LSM 2.01 4.40 2.36<br />

C18:2n6<br />

SE 0.39 0.30 0.31<br />

* A A,B B<br />

C18:3n3 - t<br />

LSM 0.17 0.19 0.22<br />

SE 0.02 0.01 0.01<br />

C18:3n3 - c<br />

LSM 0.22 0.27 0.32<br />

SE 0.03 0.02 0.02<br />

LSM 0.20 0.34 0.30<br />

CLA<br />

SE 0.04 0.03 0.03<br />

* a a<br />

C20:1<br />

LSM 0.12 0.15 0.14<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

C20:3n3<br />

LSM 0.11 0.12 0.12<br />

SE 0.02 0.02 0.02


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 173<br />

Table 9. (continued)<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

C20:4n6<br />

LSM 0.43 0.73 0.48<br />

SE 0.15 0.11 0.11<br />

LSM 0.06 0.09 0.06<br />

C20:5n3<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

* A A,B B<br />

C22:5n3<br />

LSM 0.16 0.39 0.13<br />

SE 0.12 0.10 0.10<br />

LSM 0.04 0.06 0.03<br />

C22:6n3<br />

SE 0.01 0.01 0.01<br />

* a a,B B<br />

SFA<br />

LSM 45.98 41.17 48.85<br />

SE 1.42 1.09 1.11<br />

MUFA-CIS<br />

LSM 38.28 48.49 42.59<br />

SE 3.45 2.64 2.69<br />

MUFA-TRANS<br />

LSM 1.68 1.50 1.26<br />

SE 0.19 0.14 0.15<br />

PUFA n3<br />

LSM 0.36 0.65 0.33<br />

SE 0.13 0.10 0.10<br />

PUFA n6<br />

LSM 0.43 0.73 0.48<br />

SE 0.15 0.11 0.11<br />

*<strong>–</strong> Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences at A, B, C <strong>–</strong> P < 0.01<br />

presents the distinctness to the other two<br />

groups, which both presented similar<br />

results. Definitely high levels <strong>of</strong> C18:2n6,<br />

CLA, C20:5n3 and C22:6n3 fatty acids<br />

were observed in meat <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath<br />

Sheep, whereas the lowest values were<br />

considered in case <strong>of</strong> C12:0, C14:0 and<br />

C18:0 fatty acids. This presented pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> fatty acids composition in Polish<br />

Heath Sheep testified the breed distinction<br />

to the other experimental groups and also<br />

approved the differences within the overall<br />

fat content in meat (Tab. 7). The Polish<br />

Heath Sheep presented absolutely different<br />

level <strong>of</strong> meat quality traits comparing<br />

to the other groups, which testified the<br />

original extraordinary quality. Considering<br />

the national market demands, where<br />

the lamb meat is bearing in minds as the<br />

niche meat and the kid meat basically<br />

does not exist, it must be stated that the<br />

gained experimental carcasses fulfilled<br />

the consumers’ requirements easily, especially<br />

these <strong>of</strong> the connoisseur clients.<br />

Nevertheless the lamb and kid meat<br />

needs more efforts to promote it on the<br />

national market as well as the stable<br />

presence on the supermarkets shelves.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the research on comparison<br />

slaughter weights, slaughter values,<br />

carcass measurements as well as the cuts<br />

composition and tissue characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />

leg in male lambs and male goats guided<br />

to several conclusions:<br />

1. The highest daily gains and the shortest<br />

time to reach the slaughter weight was<br />

observed in male lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska


174 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

Sheep, comparing to male lambs <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Heath Sheep and Boer goat male<br />

kids. The Boer goat male kids placed<br />

between the male lambs <strong>of</strong> both breeds.<br />

2. The Żelaźnieńska male lambs expressed<br />

the highest results <strong>of</strong> general classification<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcasses due to EUROP<br />

requirements, whereas the Boer goat<br />

male kids obtained the worst classification.<br />

The Polish Heath Sheep male<br />

lambs presented slightly lower values<br />

comparing to these obtained for Żelaźnieńska<br />

male lambs and definitely<br />

higher than the Boer male kids.<br />

3. The Boer goat male kids’ carcasses expressed<br />

the lowest level <strong>of</strong> fat cover comparing<br />

to the results obtained for both<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> male lambs (Żelaźnieńska<br />

and Polish Heath Sheep), which were<br />

at similar level.<br />

4. The highest content <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />

cuts was observed in carcasses <strong>of</strong><br />

Żelaźnieńska male lambs comparing<br />

to the Boer goat male kids. Due to this<br />

traits, the carcasses <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath<br />

Sheep male lambs were only slightly<br />

worse than these <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska male<br />

lambs, being definetly better than the<br />

carcasses <strong>of</strong> the Boer goat male kids.<br />

5. The estimation <strong>of</strong> physical and chemical<br />

parameters (including the fatty acids<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile) indicated the absolute distinctness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mld muscle quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the Polish Heath Sheep comparing to<br />

Żelaźnieńska male lambs and Boer goat<br />

male kids. The similar quality <strong>of</strong> meat<br />

traits was observed in Żelaźnieńska<br />

male lambs and Boer goat male kids.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA 2004.<br />

ANTCZAK A., ANTCZAK M., NIŻNIKOWSKI<br />

R., 2002: Poziom cech rozrodu owiec rasy<br />

wrzosówka utrzymywanych całorocznie bez pomieszczeń.<br />

Ann. Univ. M. Curie-Skłodowska,<br />

Seccio EE, XX, 16, 105<strong>–</strong>110<br />

AOAC, 1990: Association <strong>of</strong> Official Chemist.<br />

Food Composition Additives Natural Contaminants.<br />

GROBEREK J., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., 2003:<br />

Wykorzystanie odłogów jako bazy paszowej<br />

w chowie owiec. Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricult. Univ.<br />

<strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 40, 33<strong>–</strong>44.<br />

GROBEREK J., WRÓBLEWSKA L., JAWOR-<br />

SKI B., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., PFEFFER E.,<br />

2003a: Charakterystyka składu botanicznego<br />

porostu na gruncie odłogowanym, poddanym<br />

ekstensywnemu wypasowi owiec. Rocz. Nauk<br />

Zoot., 30, 1, 105<strong>–</strong>112.<br />

GROBEREK J., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., SOSIŃSKA<br />

K.A., MARCINIEC M., 2003b: Żerowanie<br />

polskich wrzosówek wypasanych na terenach<br />

odłogowanych w trakcie sezonu wegetacyjnego.<br />

Acta Agrophysica, 1 (3), 88, 441<strong>–</strong>446.<br />

GROBEREK J., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., MARCINIEC<br />

M., PFEFFER E., 2003c: Nutritive evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

pasture grass on a wasteland in free ranching enviroment.<br />

Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricult. Univ. <strong>SGGW</strong>,<br />

Anim. Sci. 41, 25<strong>–</strong>29. AOAC, 1990: Association<br />

<strong>of</strong> Official Chemist. Food Composition<br />

Additives Natural Contaminants.<br />

GRUSZECKI T., JUNKUSZEW A., LIPECKA<br />

C., KAMIŃSKA A., SZYMANOWSKA A.,<br />

PATKOWSKI K., 2004: Fatty acids composition<br />

in sheep milk and muscle tissue <strong>of</strong> lamb<br />

fed with protective fat-supplemented fodder.<br />

Arch. Tierz., Dummersdorf 47, Special Issue:<br />

183<strong>–</strong>188.<br />

NAWARA W., OSIKOWSKI M., KLUZ I., MO-<br />

DELSKA M., 1963: Wycena tryków na podstawie<br />

badania wartości potomstwa w stacjach<br />

oceny tryków Instytutu Zootechniki za rok<br />

1962. PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., ANTCZAK M., ANTCZAK<br />

A., 2002a: Level <strong>of</strong> body weight and daily<br />

gains <strong>of</strong> Polish Heat sheep kept outside a sheep<br />

house throught the year. Ann. Of Anim. Sc.<br />

Supl., 1, 113<strong>–</strong>116.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., ANTCZAK M., ANTCZAK<br />

A., 2002b: Level <strong>of</strong> body weight and daily gains<br />

<strong>of</strong> different breed and crossbred sheep kept outside<br />

a sheep house throught the vegetation period.<br />

Ann. Of. Anim. Sc. Suppl., 1, 125<strong>–</strong>128.


Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 175<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., ANTCZAK A., ANTCZAK<br />

M., WOŹNIAKOWSKA A., 2002c: Ocena<br />

wskaźników plenności matek i odchowu jagniąt<br />

różnych ras utrzymywanych bez pomieszczeń<br />

na pastwisku w trakcie okresu wegetacyjnego.<br />

Zesz. Nauk. Przegl. Hod., 63, 37<strong>–</strong>42.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., MARCINIEC M.,<br />

WOŹNIAKOWSKA A., 2002d: Comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> reproduction traits and body weight<br />

at birth <strong>of</strong> Polish Heat hept indoors and in free<br />

ranching environment. Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricult.<br />

Univ. <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 39, 29<strong>–</strong>33.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., ANTCZAK A., ANTCZAK<br />

M., WOŹNIAKOWSKA A., 2002e: Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

genotype, sex, and birth type on body weight and<br />

daily gains in lamb kept outdoor throughout<br />

vegetation period. Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agricult. Univ.<br />

<strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 39, 35<strong>–</strong>40.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN<br />

K., 1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym.<br />

Instytut Zootechniki Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

EN ISO 5508. 1996: Oleje I tłuszcze roślinne<br />

oraz zwierzęce. Analiza estrów metylowych<br />

kwasów tłuszczowych metodą chromatografii<br />

gazowej.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka badań zootechnicznych,<br />

PWRiL, Warszawa.<br />

Streszczenie: Ocena jakości tusz jagniąt i koźląt<br />

pozyskiwanych na potrzeby rynku krajowego.<br />

Badania przeprowadzono na tryczkach rasy żelaźnieńskiej<br />

(10 szt.) i wrzosówki (10 szt.) oraz koziołkach<br />

rasy burskiej (9 szt.) tuczonych do masy<br />

ciała 35 kg. Ocenie poddano cechy tempa wzrostu,<br />

wartości rzeźnej, jakości tusz i składu tkankowego<br />

udźców oraz cech fizykochemicznych (wraz<br />

z oceną pr<strong>of</strong>ilu kwasów tłuszczowych) mięsa<br />

mld. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych prac eksperymentalnych<br />

stwierdzono najwyższe przyrosty<br />

dobowe i najkrótszą długość osiągania ubojowej<br />

masy ciała u tryczków żelaźnieńskich w porównaniu<br />

do tryczków wrzosówek i koziołków burskich.<br />

W tym zakresie koziołki burskie plasowały<br />

się pomiędzy grupami rasowymi tryczków.<br />

Ponadto tryczki żelaźnieńskie charakteryzowały<br />

się najwyższą oceną klasyfikowanych według<br />

EUROP tusz, w porównaniu do najgorszej oceny<br />

u koziołków burskich. Z kolei tryczki wrzosówki<br />

osiągały nieznacznie niższą ocenę w tym zakresie<br />

w porównaniu do tryczków żelaźnieńskich,<br />

znacznie przewyższając pod tym względem tusze<br />

koziołków burskich, charakteryzujących się najniższym<br />

poziomem otłuszczenia tusz w porównaniu<br />

do nie różniących się pod tym względem obu<br />

grup tryczków. Stwierdzono najwyższe udziały<br />

części cennych w tuszy u owiec żelaźnieńskich<br />

w porównaniu do koziołków burskich. W zakresie<br />

tych cech tusz wrzosówek nieznacznie ustępowały<br />

tryczkom żelaźnieńskim, znacznie przewyższając<br />

pod tym względem koziołki burskie. Z kolei ocena<br />

poziomu cech fizycznych i chemicznych (łącznie<br />

z pr<strong>of</strong>ilem kwasów tłuszczowych) wskazała na<br />

całkowitą odrębność mięsa mld tryczków wrzosówek<br />

od tryczków żelaźnieńskich i koziołków burskich.<br />

Stwierdzono również, że koziołki burskie<br />

w tym zakresie charakteryzowały się podobnym<br />

poziomem cech jakościowych mięsa jaki uzyskano<br />

u tryczków żelaźnieńskich<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ addresses:<br />

Roman Niżnikowski, Ewa Strzelec,<br />

Krzyszt<strong>of</strong> Głowacz, Dominik Popielarczyk<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Beata Kuczyńska<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Bydła<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 177<strong>–</strong>183<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat suckled<br />

by their <strong>of</strong>fspring bred under the conditions <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

production systems<br />

ROMAN NIŻNIKOWSKI, EWA STRZELEC, DOMINIK POPIELARCZYK,<br />

KRZYSZTOF GŁOWACZ, ROBERT LITYŃSKI, AGNIESZKA ROZBICKA-<br />

-WIECZOREK<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Sheep and Goat Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Level <strong>of</strong> milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep<br />

and goat suckled by their <strong>of</strong>fspring bred under the<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> alternative production systems. The<br />

research was carried out in 2007 on the Boer goat<br />

does and ewes <strong>of</strong> two sheep breeds <strong>of</strong> Polish Heath<br />

Sheep and Żelaźnieńska. The animals were at age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2<strong>–</strong>3 years and they were suckled by the <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

born as singles or twins. During 12-weeks <strong>of</strong> lactation,<br />

the milk controlling was provided in every<br />

2-weeks. The milk from 3 hours secretion was obtained.<br />

The individual milk samples were analyzed<br />

due to the milk yield, chemical composition and<br />

somatic cell account. Moreover, at the same time<br />

<strong>of</strong> milking, the data concerning the body growth<br />

development <strong>of</strong> kids and lambs were collected.<br />

The results showed significant distinctness <strong>of</strong> Boer<br />

goats, Polish Heath Sheep and Żelaźnieńska sheep<br />

due to the all examined milking traits. The highest<br />

body weights till 84 day <strong>of</strong> life were observed in<br />

growing lambs <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska sheep in contrary<br />

to Polish Heath Sheep lambs and Boer kids. The<br />

maternal abilities <strong>of</strong> does and ewes in case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring rearing expressed the best results <strong>of</strong> daily<br />

gains at the late stage <strong>of</strong> lactation in Boer goats, then<br />

in Polish Heath Sheep and Żelaźnieńska sheep.<br />

Key words: sheep, goats, milk yield, growth development,<br />

lambs, kids.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Making the production more extensive is<br />

the one <strong>of</strong> the planned stages <strong>of</strong> transforming<br />

the utility performance <strong>of</strong> sheep<br />

and goats which guides to increase the<br />

protection and maintaining <strong>of</strong> human<br />

environment, which is also included in<br />

the Rural Development Plan. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

elements is the development <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

ways <strong>of</strong> animal production, which<br />

basic thought is the rational use <strong>of</strong> small<br />

ruminant, especially sheep and goats. It<br />

is not surprising, that the Polish indigenous<br />

sheep and meat goat breeds focus<br />

more attention <strong>of</strong> farmers and scientists.<br />

Such changes in the utility performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> these species must have some effects<br />

on the milk production traits and the<br />

effect on the <strong>of</strong>fspring rearing should be<br />

specially considered (Niżnikowski et al.,<br />

1991; 1994; Nowak 1993; 1994; Nowak<br />

et al., 1993ab).<br />

Therefore, the aim <strong>of</strong> this research<br />

was to compare the milk performance <strong>of</strong><br />

suckled ewes and does according to the<br />

growth development <strong>of</strong> lambs and kids<br />

under the extensive production conditions.<br />

Two sheep breeds (Polish Heath<br />

Sheep and Żelaźnieńska) as well as one<br />

goat breed (Boer goat) were examined<br />

due to their milk performance traits and


178 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

body growth development <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

during lactation.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The research was carried out in 2007 on<br />

the Boer goats (6 does), Żelaźnieńska and<br />

Polish Heath Sheep (15 and 15 ewes,<br />

respectively) at the Sheep and Goat<br />

Research Farm owned by the <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong>. The does<br />

and ewes were at their 1 or 2 lactation and<br />

they were suckled by 1 or 2 <strong>of</strong>fspring. The<br />

sheep and goats were fed accordingly to<br />

the proper feeding norms (Osikowski et<br />

al., 1993). The group <strong>of</strong> ewes and does<br />

were milked with the milking machine<br />

during 12-weeks lactation. The females<br />

were prepared for milking using the<br />

method proposed by Konstantinou (1973).<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fspring was separated from mothers<br />

for 2 hours to stimulate their feeling<br />

<strong>of</strong> hunger and to rise the appetite. During<br />

this time, the kids and lambs were<br />

weighted and then joined again with does<br />

and ewes for another 30 minutes to empty<br />

the udders completely. Then, after the<br />

suckling time, the kids and lambs were<br />

again separated and the does and ewes<br />

were left for 3 hours. The milking started<br />

by the 3-hours break with the milking<br />

machine. Due to the different individual<br />

secretion lengths <strong>of</strong> females during the<br />

milking, the individual secretion lengths<br />

were calculated for 3-hours time. A portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> 5 i.u. <strong>of</strong> synthetic oxitocine was<br />

injected to every doe and ewe two minutes<br />

before the milking started to obtain<br />

the whole milk from udder. Individual<br />

milk samples were collected and used for<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> chemical composition on the<br />

Milko-Scan machine (Foss). Moreover,<br />

the somatic cell account in 1 liter <strong>of</strong> milk<br />

was individually established on the<br />

Somacount 150 (Bentley) apparatus and<br />

then the logarithms <strong>of</strong> somatic cell accounts<br />

were calculated (Zarzycki et al.,<br />

1983) and then were used in statistical<br />

calculations.<br />

The kids and lambs were weighted<br />

6 times: at birth and at age <strong>of</strong> 14, 28, 42,<br />

56, 70 and 84 days. Moreover, the all<br />

daily gains between consecutive periods<br />

<strong>of</strong> growing were also calculated.<br />

The results were calculated with the<br />

LSM method using the SPSS s<strong>of</strong>tware (v.<br />

12, ANON., 2004). The milk traits were<br />

calculated due to the statistical model<br />

concerning the effects <strong>of</strong>: genotype, age,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> suckling <strong>of</strong>fspring and week<br />

<strong>of</strong> lactation as well as the double-factor<br />

interaction: genotype × week <strong>of</strong> lactation.<br />

Due to the body weights and daily<br />

gains <strong>of</strong> kids, the effects <strong>of</strong> genotype, sex<br />

and type <strong>of</strong> birth as well as all possible<br />

double-factors interactions were estimated.<br />

Statistical differences between experimental<br />

groups were evaluated with the<br />

F-test (Ruszczyc, 1981).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors<br />

and interaction on analyzed milk traits<br />

was presented in Table 1. The genotype<br />

affected all traits statistically, as well as<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> females, excluding the contents<br />

<strong>of</strong> protein, lactose and non-fat dry matter.<br />

The week <strong>of</strong> lactation affected statistically<br />

(p ≤ 0.01) all traits excluding the<br />

non-fat dry matter content. The number<br />

<strong>of</strong> suckling <strong>of</strong>fspring affected only the<br />

milk yield and fat content. The effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> interaction was statistically insignificant<br />

only in milk yield, non-fat dry matter content<br />

and somatic cell account. Presented


Level <strong>of</strong> milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 179<br />

effects’ evaluation was compatible to<br />

the results presented by other authors<br />

(Niżnikowski et al., 1991; 1994; Nowak,<br />

1993; 1994; Nowak et al., 1993ab).<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on examined<br />

traits was presented in Table 2. The milk<br />

yield was the highest in the Boer goats,<br />

while the lowest was observed in the<br />

Polish Heath Sheep. The differences<br />

between the experimental groups were<br />

statistically significant. The most impressing<br />

fact was the significantly higher fat<br />

content in milk <strong>of</strong> Boer does (p ≤ 0.01)<br />

in comparison to the ovine milk, whereas<br />

the Polish Heath Sheep ewes presented<br />

better results than Żelaźnieńska ewes in<br />

this case. However, the highest protein<br />

content was observed in milk <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Heath Sheep, whereas the Boer goat presented<br />

the lowest values. Also the differences<br />

between the experimental groups<br />

were statistically verified (p ≤ 0.05 and<br />

p ≤ 0.01). The lactose content was at<br />

the lowest level in milk <strong>of</strong> Boer goats<br />

comparing to the ovine milk, whereas<br />

the milk <strong>of</strong> both sheep breeds did not<br />

differ between each other. Nevertheless,<br />

the dry matter content was the lowest in<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska ewes comparing<br />

to the other experimental groups, while<br />

TABLE 1. The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on milk traits in small ruminants (n = 36)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

Traits<br />

number genotype *<br />

genotype<br />

lactation<br />

week <strong>of</strong><br />

X SE<br />

age<br />

<strong>of</strong> suckling week<br />

<strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> lactation<br />

Milk yield (ml) XX XX XX X NS 268 14<br />

Chemical<br />

composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk (%)<br />

Fat XX XX XX XX X 6.48 0.20<br />

Protein XX NS XX NS XX 4.64 0.05<br />

Lactose XX NS XX NS XX 5.24 0.04<br />

Dry matter XX XX XX NS X 17.10 0.21<br />

Non-fat dry matter X NS NS NS NS 6.95 0.14<br />

Somatic cell account (log) XX NS XX NS NS 2.47 0.05<br />

Statistical significance at: XX <strong>–</strong> p < 0.01; X <strong>–</strong> p < 0.05; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant<br />

TABLE 2. The effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on milk traits in small ruminants (n = 36)<br />

Boer goats (A) Polish Heath Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

Traits<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

n = 6 n = 15 n = 15<br />

Milk yield (ml) 339 Bc 28 198 Ac 20 262 ab 25<br />

Chemical<br />

composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> milk (%)<br />

Fat 7.99 BC 0.40 6.35 AC 0.28 5.09 BC 0.36<br />

Protein 4.18 BC 0.10 5.19 AC 0.07 4.58 BC 0.09<br />

Lactose 4.87 BC 0.07 5.43 A 0.05 5.43 A 0.06<br />

Dry matter 17.55 C 0.42 17.92 C 0.30 15.91 AB 0.38<br />

Non-fat dry matter 6.48 B 0.28 7.42 A 0.19 6.97 0.25<br />

Somatic cell account (log) 2.72 Bc 0.09 2.21 Ac 0.07 2.45 ab 0.09<br />

Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences between groups at: a, b, c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05, A, B, C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


180 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

they both presented similar results. Milk<br />

<strong>of</strong> Polish Heath Sheep presented significantly<br />

higher content <strong>of</strong> non-fat dry<br />

matter in comparison to the Boer goats’<br />

milk. Due to the somatic cell account, the<br />

highest values were obtained in the milk<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Boer goats, the lowest in milk <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish Heath Sheep, whereas the milk <strong>of</strong><br />

Żelaźnieńska sheep was placed between<br />

them. The results presented in Table 2<br />

showed the huge distinctness between all<br />

experimental groups in cases <strong>of</strong> milk performance<br />

traits such as milk yield, chemical<br />

composition and somatic cell account,<br />

which were compatible to the results presented<br />

in other studies (Niżnikowski et al.,<br />

1991; 1994; Nowak 1993, 1994; Nowak<br />

et al., 1993ab). Comparison <strong>of</strong> the milk<br />

performance results with the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

growth development <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring should<br />

give the information about the maternal<br />

abilities <strong>of</strong> the examined breeds and species<br />

expressed in the <strong>of</strong>fspring rearing<br />

indicators.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and<br />

interactions on the growth body development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspring were presented in<br />

Table 3. The genotype affected all traits<br />

<strong>of</strong> body weights in different age groups,<br />

whereas its effect on daily gains was<br />

only observed in periods <strong>of</strong> 14<strong>–</strong>28 and<br />

70<strong>–</strong>84 days <strong>of</strong> life. The sex <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring<br />

did not affected any <strong>of</strong> examined traits,<br />

which was a quite surprising, because<br />

the female-<strong>of</strong>fspring develops longer<br />

than male-<strong>of</strong>fspring. The effect <strong>of</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />

birth was observed in all traits excluding<br />

the body weights at birth and at 14 day <strong>of</strong><br />

age as well as the daily gains in periods<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0<strong>–</strong>14, 56<strong>–</strong>70 and 70<strong>–</strong>84 days. None <strong>of</strong><br />

the interactions affected the examined<br />

growth development traits excluding<br />

TABLE 3. Effects <strong>of</strong> chosen factors and interactions on body weights and daily gains in lambs and kids<br />

(n = 42)<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Interactions<br />

Traits<br />

genotype<br />

sex type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth<br />

genotype<br />

* sex<br />

genotype *<br />

type <strong>of</strong> birth<br />

sex * type<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth<br />

X SE<br />

Body weight (kg) at age <strong>of</strong><br />

at birth XX NS NS NS NS NS 3.77 0.11<br />

14 days XX NS NS NS NS NS 4.96 0.15<br />

28 days XX NS X NS NS NS 9.02 1.22<br />

42 days XX NS XX NS NS NS 11.04 0.26<br />

56 days XX NS XX NS NS NS 13.83 0.34<br />

70 days XX NS XX NS NS NS 15.33 0.33<br />

84 days XX NS XX NS NS NS 16.97 0.37<br />

Daily gains (g/day) in periods <strong>of</strong><br />

0<strong>–</strong>14 days NS NS NS NS NS NS 172 17<br />

14<strong>–</strong>28 days XX NS XX NS NS NS 239 7<br />

28<strong>–</strong>42 days NS NS XX NS NS NS 183 12<br />

42<strong>–</strong>56 days NS NS X NS NS NS 200 10<br />

56<strong>–</strong>70 days NS NS NS NS NS NS 196 9<br />

70<strong>–</strong>84 days XX NS NS X NS NS 136 8<br />

Statistical significance at: X <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05; XX <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01; NS <strong>–</strong> non-significant


Level <strong>of</strong> milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 181<br />

only the significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect <strong>of</strong><br />

genotype x sex interaction on the daily<br />

gain in period 70<strong>–</strong>84 days.<br />

The interesting outline <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

between the experimental groups in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> body growth development was presented<br />

in Table 4. The Żelaźnieńska lambs<br />

dominated over the other experimental<br />

groups in case <strong>of</strong> the all body weights<br />

in all age groups, whereas the Boer kids<br />

and Polish Heath Sheep presented similar<br />

results. Similar draft <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

was observed due to the daily gains in<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 14<strong>–</strong>28 days <strong>of</strong> age, whereas<br />

the fastest growers at the end <strong>of</strong> rearing<br />

(70<strong>–</strong>84 days <strong>of</strong> age) were the Boer kids,<br />

while the worst results presented lambs<br />

<strong>of</strong> Żelaźnieńska sheep.<br />

Naturally, the results <strong>of</strong> growth development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspring should be related<br />

to the body weights <strong>of</strong> adult animals and<br />

their growing <strong>of</strong>fspring, which indicated<br />

to focus more attention on daily gains in<br />

kids and lambs, especially at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

rearing period. All experimental groups<br />

presented high level <strong>of</strong> rearing predispositions<br />

during most <strong>of</strong> the rearing periods.<br />

Nevertheless, the analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

daily gains during the last rearing period<br />

indicated that the Boer does might be<br />

the best mothers due to their relatively<br />

higher milk yields, then the Polish Heath<br />

Sheep ewes and at the end <strong>–</strong> Żelaźnieńska<br />

ewes. This scientific hypothesis should<br />

be examined in further researches. The<br />

presented outline <strong>of</strong> the differences in the<br />

daily gains indicated the good usefulness<br />

<strong>of</strong> mothers from all experimental groups<br />

to rear the healthy <strong>of</strong>fspring, which was<br />

also reported in other studies (Konstantinou,<br />

1973; Niżnikowski et al., 1994;<br />

Nowak, 1994).<br />

TABLE 4. Effect <strong>of</strong> genotype on body weights and daily gains in lambs and kids (n = 42)<br />

Boer goats (A) Polish Heath Sheep (B) Żelaźnieńska Sheep (C)<br />

Traits<br />

LSM SE LSM SE LSM SE<br />

n = 6 n = 21 n = 15<br />

Body weight (kg) at age <strong>of</strong><br />

at birth 3.36 C 0.26 2.90 C 0.14 5.05 AB 0.17<br />

14 days 4.52 C 0.35 4.47 C 0.18 5.88 AB 0.22<br />

28 days 7.88 C 0.52 7.95 C 0.28 11.22 AB 0.34<br />

42 days 9.73 C 0.61 9.87 C 0.32 13.52 AB 0.39<br />

56 days 12.51 C 0.81 12.62 C 0.43 16.37 AB 0.52<br />

70 days 14.37 C 0.78 13.91 C 0.41 17.72 AB 0.50<br />

84 days 16.71 0.87 15.46 C 0.46 18.73 B 0.56<br />

Daily gains (g/day) in periods <strong>of</strong><br />

0<strong>–</strong>14 days 166 39 175 21 175 25<br />

14<strong>–</strong>28 days 198 C 16 204 C 9 314 AB 11<br />

28<strong>–</strong>42 days 167 27 175 15 209 18<br />

42<strong>–</strong>56 days 199 24 196 13 204 15<br />

56<strong>–</strong>70 days 169 21 117 11 123 13<br />

70<strong>–</strong>84 days 138 bC 20 91 ac 10 59 Ab 13<br />

Statistical significance <strong>of</strong> differences between groups at: a, b, c <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.05, A, B, C <strong>–</strong> p ≤ 0.01


182 R. Niżnikowski et al.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results were following to several<br />

conclusions:<br />

1. The significant distinctness <strong>of</strong> Boer<br />

goats, Polish Heath Sheep and Żelaźnieńska<br />

sheep was observed due to all<br />

milk traits (milk yield, chemical composition<br />

and somatic cell account).<br />

2. The highest body weights during 84-days<br />

rearing were observed in Żelaźnieńska<br />

lambs comparing to lambs <strong>of</strong> Polish<br />

Heath Sheep and kids <strong>of</strong> Boer goat.<br />

3. Considering the maternal abilities <strong>of</strong><br />

ewes and does in case <strong>of</strong> rearing, the<br />

similar results were observed in all<br />

breeds and species, nevertheless the<br />

best results were presented by the Boer<br />

goat does and then by ewes <strong>of</strong> both<br />

sheep breeds, which should be also<br />

examined in further experiments.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANON., 2004: Statistical Product and Service<br />

Solution base version 12.0 for Windows. SPSS<br />

inc. USA 2004.<br />

KONSTANTINOU A., 1973: Vergleichende<br />

Untersuchungen zur Methodik uber die Milchleistungserfassung<br />

bei Fleischschafen sowie<br />

uber die Zusammensetzung der Milch und die<br />

Auswirkungen der Milchleistung im Verlauf der<br />

Laktation auf die Wollfeinheit von Deutchen<br />

Schwarzkopfigen Fleischschafen und Finnkreuzungen.<br />

Institut fur Tierzucht u. Haustiergenetik<br />

der J. Liebig Universitat Giessen.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W., TYSZKA Z.J.,<br />

JANIKOWSKI W.T., 1991: Wpływ różnych<br />

czynników na poziom cech użytkowości owiec<br />

wschodni<strong>of</strong>ryzyjskich i typu corriedale w okresie<br />

12 tygodni laktacji. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 18,<br />

129<strong>–</strong>139.<br />

NIŻNIKOWSKI R., JANIKOWSKI W.T., TYSZ-<br />

KA Z.J., WILCZKOWSKA J., 1994: The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> genotype and the number <strong>of</strong> suckling<br />

lambs on the milk traits <strong>of</strong> ewes. Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong>.<br />

Agricult. Univ. <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 30, 37<strong>–</strong>43.<br />

NOWAK W., 1993: Wstępne wyniki oceny mleczności<br />

owiec rasy wrzosówka karmiących jagnięta.<br />

Zesz. Nauk. PTZ, 11, 43<strong>–</strong>51.<br />

NOWAK W., 1994: Poziom wybranych cech<br />

produkcyjnych maciorek wrzosówki polskiej,<br />

ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem cech mleczności<br />

na przykładzie jednego ze stad objętych<br />

programem hodowli zachowawczej. Praca doktorska,<br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz <strong>SGGW</strong>,<br />

Warszawa.<br />

NOWAK W., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W.,<br />

TYSZKA Z.J., JANIKOWSKI W.T., 1993a:<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> factors connected with sheep<br />

udders on production traits evaluated during<br />

lactation. Part I: The cell elements in milk. Procedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 5th International Symposium on<br />

Machine Milking <strong>of</strong> Small Ruminants. 14<strong>–</strong>20<br />

May, 1993, Budapest, 3<strong>–</strong>11.<br />

NOWAK W., NIŻNIKOWSKI R., RANT W.,<br />

TYSZKA Z.J., JANIKOWSKI W.T., 1993b:<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> factors connected with sheep<br />

udders on production traits evaluated during<br />

lactation. Part II: The type and consistency <strong>of</strong><br />

udder. Procedings <strong>of</strong> the 5th International Symposium<br />

on Machine Milking <strong>of</strong> Small Ruminants.<br />

14<strong>–</strong>20 May, 1993, Budapest, 12<strong>–</strong>21.<br />

OSIKOWSKI M., PORĘBSKA W., KORMAN K.,<br />

1993: Normy żywienia owiec. Normy żywienia<br />

bydła i owiec systemem tradycyjnym. Instytut<br />

Zootechniki Kraków, 29<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

RUSZCZYC Z., 1981: Metodyka doświadczeń<br />

zootechnicznych. PWRiL. Warszawa.<br />

ZARZYCKI J., TYSZKA Z.J., SKOLASIŃSKI<br />

W., 1983: Próba wyznaczenia granicy dla fizjologicznej<br />

zawartości elementów komórkowych<br />

w mleku owczym. Med. Wet., 39(12),<br />

738<strong>–</strong>740.<br />

Streszczenie: Poziom mleczności owiec i kóz karmiących<br />

potomstwo utrzymywanych w warunkach<br />

systemu produkcji alternatywnej. Badania wykonano<br />

na kozach burskich oraz matkach wrzosówkach<br />

i żelaźnieńskich, będących w wieku 2 do<br />

3 lat, oraz ich potomstwie pochodzącym z miotów<br />

pojedynczych i bliźniaczych. U kóz i maciorek<br />

wykonano przez okres 12 laktacji kontrole mleczności<br />

prowadzone z częstotliwością co 2 tygodnie,<br />

pozyskując mleko z okresu sekrecji trwającej<br />

przez 3 godziny. Oceniono ilość mleka, skład chemiczny<br />

oraz zawartość elementów komórkowych<br />

w mleku. W analogicznych okresach prowadzono


Level <strong>of</strong> milk performance <strong>of</strong> sheep and goat... 183<br />

ważenia kontrolne jagniąt i koźląt w celu oceny<br />

rozwoju masy ciała i tempa przyrastania w tym<br />

czasie. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych badań<br />

wykazano odrębność kóz burskich, wrzosówek<br />

i owiec żelaźnieńskich w zakresie wszystkich<br />

cech mleczności. Stwierdzono najwyższe masy<br />

ciała u rosnących jagniąt rasy żelaźnieńskiej<br />

w porównaniu do jagniąt wrzosówek i koźląt burskich<br />

w trakcie odchowu do 84 dnia życia. Oceniając<br />

przydatność kóz i matek badanych ras do<br />

odchowu potomstwa na podstawie ich dobowych<br />

przyrostów, stwierdzić należy ich podobny zakres,<br />

ze wskazaniem na najlepsze wyniki w końcowym<br />

okresie laktacji u kóz burskich, następnie wrzosówek<br />

i owiec żelaźnieńskich.<br />

MS. received July 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Zakład Hodowli Owiec i Kóz<br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 185<strong>–</strong>192<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> selected factors on Limousine and Charolaise<br />

beef calves vitality<br />

JAN SLÓSARZ, TOMASZ PRZYSUCHA, HENRYK GRODZKI,<br />

BEATA MAJCHRZAK<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: The infl uence <strong>of</strong> selected factors on<br />

Limousine and Charolaise beef calves vitality.<br />

Material for the study consisted <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong><br />

individual performance <strong>of</strong> beef cattle for the period<br />

2000<strong>–</strong>2007 conducted by the Polish Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Beef Cattle Breeders and Producers. Two French<br />

breeds <strong>of</strong> beef cattle <strong>–</strong> Charolaise and Limousine<br />

were taken into consideration. Calves vitality was<br />

assessed to the following scale: healthy, weak.<br />

Statistical analysis included the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

assessments viability <strong>of</strong> calves according to the<br />

following factors: breed, cow weight, the calving<br />

number, calf sex, calf weight at birth, calving season.<br />

There were found statistically significant differences<br />

(p ≤ 0.05) in the Charolaise and Limousine<br />

calves vitality. Worse vitality <strong>of</strong> Charolaise calves<br />

was probably due to the higher frequency <strong>of</strong> complicated<br />

deliveries, comparing to Limousine. With<br />

the increase <strong>of</strong> cow body weight before calving the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> calves with poor vitality decreased.<br />

The differences were statistically significant<br />

(p ≤ 0.05). Studies <strong>of</strong> the other authors confirm<br />

obtained results. It was found that along to the cow<br />

body weight at calving increase the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

calves with poor vitality decreased. The differences<br />

were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). Statistically<br />

highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) effect <strong>of</strong> calf<br />

sex on its vitality was stated. Much higher percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> poor healthy calves was in the group <strong>of</strong><br />

bull calves. There was no statistically significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> calf body weight at birth on its vitality,<br />

but the most healthy calves (vital energy) in the<br />

group had an average body weight at birth. There<br />

was no significant effect <strong>of</strong> calving season on the<br />

calves vitality.<br />

Key words: beef cattle, calves vitality.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The connection <strong>of</strong> economic results with<br />

herd fertility rate is particularly visible in<br />

beef cattle farming, where relatively heavy,<br />

healthy, vital and well muscle-bound calf,<br />

born during delivery <strong>of</strong> a normal course,<br />

is the main product, and the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cow comes down to giving birth to the<br />

calf and rise it until the moment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

weaning. In herds using the commercial<br />

crossbreeding milk remains the main<br />

product, but the quality <strong>of</strong> borning crossbreds<br />

determines the final economic<br />

result. Thus a proper course <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />

in the herds <strong>of</strong> purebred beef cattle<br />

or those using commercial crossing is<br />

a significant condition <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Calves vitality (including stillbirths) directly<br />

influences the economic result.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> stillbirths or death in the first<br />

days <strong>of</strong> life, the breeder bears high, not<br />

compensated costs, among which yearly<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> living and feeding the cow are<br />

the most important, though not the only<br />

ones. Healthy, vital calves better utilize<br />

colostrum feeding period, earlier begin to<br />

take stable feedstuffs, and consequently


186 J. Slósarz et al.<br />

obtain better daily body gains in the<br />

rearing period as well as had better musculature<br />

in the moment <strong>of</strong> weaning.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to determine<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> such factors as: breed,<br />

cow body weight, calf sex, calf body<br />

weight at birth and calving season on<br />

vitality <strong>of</strong> calves <strong>of</strong> French breeds <strong>–</strong><br />

Limousine and Charolaise.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Material for the study consisted <strong>of</strong> the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> individual performance <strong>of</strong> beef<br />

cattle for the period 2000<strong>–</strong>2007 conducted<br />

by the Polish Association <strong>of</strong> Beef Cattle<br />

Breeders and Producers. Two French<br />

breeds <strong>of</strong> beef cattle Charolaise and Limousine<br />

were taken into consideration.<br />

Calves vitality was assessed according<br />

to the following scale: (1) healthy, (2)<br />

weak, (3) stillborn or dead up to 24 hrs<br />

after birth, (4) dead or slaughter necessity<br />

up to 14 days after birth. As there<br />

were no accidents 3 and 4, only healthy<br />

and weak calves were considered in the<br />

statistical analysis.<br />

Statistical analysis included the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> assessments viability <strong>of</strong> calves<br />

according to the following factors:<br />

• breed: (1) Charolaise, (2) Limousine<br />

• cow body weight: (1) ≤ 600 kg, (2)<br />

601<strong>–</strong>700 kg, (3) > 700 kg<br />

• calving number: 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4<br />

• calf sex: (1) heifer, (2) bull<br />

• calf body weight at birth: (1) ≤ 35 kg,<br />

(2) 36<strong>–</strong>45 kg, (3) > 45 kg<br />

• calving season: (1) January <strong>–</strong> May, (2)<br />

June <strong>–</strong> December.<br />

For statistical analysis Pearson’s χ 2<br />

test, SPSS ver. 10.0 PL were used.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> breed on calves vitality<br />

was presented in Table 1. Statistically<br />

significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in vitality<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charolaise and Limousine calves<br />

were observed. Jędrzejczyk et al. (2000)<br />

reported breed differences in mortality <strong>of</strong><br />

calves <strong>of</strong> examined beef cattle breeds.<br />

Worse vitality <strong>of</strong> Charolaise calves was<br />

probably due to the higher frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

complicated deliveries, comparing to<br />

Limousine.<br />

Stillbirths are directly connected with<br />

the delivery course, hence it is influenced<br />

by majority <strong>of</strong> the factors conditioning<br />

calving quality. According to many<br />

authors, calves mortality (even up to<br />

1 month after birth) is much higher if the<br />

calves were born in result <strong>of</strong> the delive-<br />

TABLE 1. The influence <strong>of</strong> breed on calves vitality<br />

Breed<br />

Calves vitality<br />

healthy weak total<br />

Charolaise<br />

N 4 628 292 4 920<br />

% 94.1 5.9 100<br />

Limousine<br />

N 7 798 411 8 209<br />

% 95.0 5.0 100<br />

Average<br />

N 12 426 703 13 129<br />

% 94.6 5.4 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 5.230, significance P ≤ 0.05


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> selected factors... 187<br />

ries, which course was assessed as difficult<br />

(Laster, Gregory, 1973; Meijering,<br />

1984).<br />

Table 2 shows the influence <strong>of</strong> cow<br />

body weight on calves vitality. With the<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> cow body weight before calving<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> calves with poor<br />

vitality decreased. The differences were<br />

statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).<br />

Nogalski et al. (2000) noted, that<br />

mothers <strong>of</strong> dead calves were considerably<br />

lighter and in worse condition, and<br />

consequently they created worse conditions<br />

for foetus development as well as<br />

were poorly prepared for the delivery<br />

effort.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight on<br />

delivery course, and consequently on<br />

calf vitality, is not explict. The majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> conducted experiments shows, that<br />

heavier cows have less delivery problems.<br />

Optimal cow body weight and<br />

measurements mainly depend on production<br />

system (Morris, Wilton, 1976;<br />

Morris, Wilton, 1977; Andersen, 1978;<br />

Dickerson, 1978; Fitzhugh, 1978; Notter<br />

et al., 1979). The benefits resulting from<br />

lower frequency <strong>of</strong> difficult deliveries<br />

in cows <strong>of</strong> large calibre and high body<br />

weight may be however equalized by<br />

higher costs <strong>of</strong> feeding.<br />

In Table 3 the influence <strong>of</strong> calving<br />

number on calves vitality was presented.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> calves, which vitality<br />

was assessed as “weak” decreased along<br />

with calving number increase. The differences<br />

were statistically significant<br />

(p ≤ 0.05). Many experiments proved,<br />

that the age <strong>of</strong> cows and calving number<br />

bound up with it has highly significant<br />

influence on difficult deliveries frequency.<br />

Difficult calvings occur more frequently<br />

in primiparous cows than in multiparous<br />

ones (Philipsson, 1976b; Sieber<br />

et al., 1989; Nogalski, Klupczyński, 1999;<br />

Krzywda et al., 2002; Albera et al., 2004;<br />

Przysucha et al., 2005b; Przysucha et al.,<br />

2006). The main reason <strong>of</strong> delivery difficulties<br />

in primiparous cows is insufficient<br />

area <strong>of</strong> reproductive duct, and especially<br />

its skeleton. Delivery problems also take<br />

place frequently in cows giving birth to<br />

the second calf. It is mainly connected<br />

with smaller body measurement and<br />

incomplete pelvis development (Berger,<br />

1994; Meyer et al., 2000). Counting from<br />

the third calving, cow’s age is not a factor<br />

significantly influencing delivery course,<br />

TABLE 2. The influence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight on calves vitality<br />

Cow body weight<br />

Calves vitality<br />

healthy weak total<br />

≤ 600 kg<br />

N 5 987 376 6 363<br />

% 94.1 5.9 100<br />

601<strong>–</strong>700 kg<br />

N 4 859 246 5 105<br />

% 95.2 4.8 100<br />

> 700 kg<br />

N 1525 79 1 604<br />

% 95.1 4.9 100<br />

Average<br />

N 12 371 701 13 072<br />

% 94.6 5.4 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 7.325, significance P ≤ 0.05


188 J. Slósarz et al.<br />

which was confirmed by the performance<br />

results analysis <strong>of</strong> Polish population<br />

<strong>of</strong> beef cows (Przysucha et al., 2005a;<br />

Przysucha et al., 2005b). The percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> difficult calvings both in cows <strong>of</strong><br />

Charolaise breed, described as the breed<br />

with relatively big share <strong>of</strong> complicated<br />

deliveries (Przysucha et al., 2005c), and<br />

Limousine breed, well-known for delivery<br />

ease (Przysucha et al., 2005a), high-<br />

-significantly decreased from the third<br />

calving.<br />

Table 4 illustrates the influence <strong>of</strong> sex<br />

on calves vitality. Statistically highly<br />

significant (p ≤ 0.01) effect <strong>of</strong> calf sex<br />

on its vitality was stated. Much higher<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> poor healthy calves was<br />

in the group <strong>of</strong> bull calves. A significant<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> calf sex on calving quality,<br />

and consequently on borning calves vitality,<br />

is well described and proven by the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> authors. This factor directly<br />

influences delivery course, which means<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> complicated calvings.<br />

Heifer calves are born easier than bull<br />

calves, which is connected with lower<br />

body weight (Brzozowski, 1985b; Bellows<br />

et al., 1990; Przysucha et al., 2005a;<br />

Przysucha et al., 2005b). According to<br />

Philipsson (1976b) borning bulls cause<br />

2.5 times bigger risk <strong>of</strong> delivery complications<br />

in comparison with heifers.<br />

TABLE 3. The influence <strong>of</strong> calving number on calves vitality<br />

Calves vitality<br />

Calving number<br />

healthy weak total<br />

N 3 068 195 3 263<br />

1<br />

% 94.0 6.0 100<br />

N 2 538 159 2 697<br />

2<br />

% 94.1 5.9 100<br />

N 2 118 127 2 245<br />

3<br />

% 94.3 5.7 100<br />

N 4 702 222 4 924<br />

≥ 4<br />

% 95.5 4.5 100<br />

N 12 426 703 13 129<br />

Average<br />

% 94.6 5.4 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 11.404, significance P ≤ 0.05<br />

TABLE 4. The influence <strong>of</strong> sex on calves vitality<br />

Calves vitality<br />

Sex<br />

healthy weak total<br />

N 6 151 167 6 318<br />

♀<br />

% 97.4 2.6 100<br />

N 6 033 293 6 326<br />

♂<br />

% 95.4 4.6 100<br />

N 12 184 460 12 644<br />

Average<br />

% 96.4 3.6 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 35.651, significance P ≤ 0.01


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> selected factors... 189<br />

Depending on authors, the differences<br />

in body weights <strong>of</strong> bulls and heifers<br />

amount from 1 kg up to 5 kg. It partially<br />

results from the fact, that pregnancies<br />

with a male foetus are usually longer by<br />

1<strong>–</strong>2 days. The analysis <strong>of</strong> sex influence<br />

on calving course in Polish population<br />

<strong>of</strong> Limousines (Przysucha et al., 2005a),<br />

Charolaises (Przysucha et al., 2005c),<br />

Anguses and Herefords (Przysucha et<br />

al., 2005b) confirmed highly significant<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> that factor. Wroński et al.<br />

(1996), describing the first Limousine<br />

herd in Poland, did not observe the above<br />

mentioned dependence.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> calf body weight at<br />

birth on calves vitality is presented in<br />

Table 5. There was no statistically significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> calf body weight at birth<br />

on its vitality, but the most healthy calves<br />

(vital energy) in the group had an average<br />

body weight at birth.<br />

Malinowski et al. (1983) observed,<br />

that high body weight <strong>of</strong> the borning calf<br />

together with improper foetus arrangement<br />

causes extended delivery time, which<br />

directly influences the newborn infant.<br />

Table 6 shows the influence <strong>of</strong> calving<br />

season on calves vitality. There was no<br />

significant effect <strong>of</strong> calving season on the<br />

investigated trait. In beef breeding herds<br />

the seasonal character <strong>of</strong> calvings has<br />

a great importance since the appropriate<br />

time <strong>of</strong> calving allows to obtain the best<br />

breeding material at the lowest expenses<br />

(maximal pasture utilization in the rearing<br />

TABLE 5. The influence <strong>of</strong> calf body weight on calves vitality<br />

Calf body weight at birth (kg)<br />

Calves vitality<br />

healthy weak total<br />

≤ 35<br />

N 5 392 113 5 505<br />

% 97.9 2.1 100<br />

36<strong>–</strong>45<br />

N 6 304 124 6 428<br />

% 98.1 1.9 100<br />

> 45<br />

N 715 19 734<br />

% 97.4 2.6 100<br />

Average<br />

N 12 411 256 12 667<br />

% 98.0 2.0 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 1.496, not significant<br />

TABLE 6. The influence <strong>of</strong> calving season on calves vitality<br />

Calving season<br />

Calves vitality<br />

healthy weak total<br />

January <strong>–</strong> May<br />

N 7 353 422 7 775<br />

% 94.6 5.4 100<br />

June <strong>–</strong> December<br />

N 5 073 281 5 354<br />

% 94.8 5.2 100<br />

Average<br />

N 12 426 703 13 129<br />

% 94.6 5.4 100<br />

Pearson’s χ 2 = 0.201, not significant


190 J. Slósarz et al.<br />

period <strong>of</strong> calves). According to many<br />

authors (Choroszy et al., 2003; Dobicki,<br />

1995; Jasiorowski, Przysucha, 2004) service<br />

period and resulting from it calving time<br />

should not be longer than 2<strong>–</strong>3 months.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> 24 hrs outdoor keeping beef<br />

cows should calve in winter (January,<br />

February, March in an optimal way).<br />

The calves born in that months, upon the<br />

intensive sucking period, are prepared to<br />

full utilization <strong>of</strong> the pasture (stomach<br />

development), grow fast, are healthy and<br />

well developed, and consequently their<br />

daily body gain is charged as little as<br />

possible. It should be emphasized, that<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> winter calvings the weaning<br />

moment meets the impoverished pasture<br />

in autumn, the consequence <strong>of</strong> which is<br />

the natural drying <strong>of</strong> the cows.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the results obtained, confronted<br />

with other authors’ conclusions,<br />

permitted to recapitulate as follows:<br />

• There were found statistically significant<br />

differences (p ≤ 0.05) in the Charolaise<br />

and Limousine calves vitality.<br />

Worse vitality <strong>of</strong> Charolaise calves was<br />

probably due to the higher frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> complicated deliveries, comparing<br />

to Limousine.<br />

• With the increase <strong>of</strong> cow body weight<br />

before calving the percentage <strong>of</strong> calves<br />

with poor vitality decreased. The differences<br />

were statistically significant<br />

(p ≤ 0.05). Studies <strong>of</strong> other authors<br />

confirm results obtained.<br />

• It was found that along to the cow<br />

body weight at calving increase the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> calves with poor vitality<br />

decreased. The differences were statistically<br />

significant (p ≤ 0.05).<br />

• Statistically highly significant (p ≤ 0.01)<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> calf sex on its vitality was<br />

stated. Much higher percentage <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

healthy calves was in the group <strong>of</strong> bull<br />

calves.<br />

• There was no statistically significant<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> calf body weight at birth on<br />

its vitality, but the most healthy calves<br />

(vital energy) in the group had an<br />

average body weight at birth.<br />

• There was no significant effect <strong>of</strong><br />

calving season on the calves vitality.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ALBERA A., GROEN A.F., CARNIER P., 2004:<br />

Genetic relationships between calving performance<br />

and beef production traits in Piemontese<br />

cattle. J. <strong>Animal</strong> Sci. 82, 3440<strong>–</strong>3446.<br />

ANDERSEN B.B., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency,<br />

with special reference to growth and feed<br />

conversion in cattle. Anim. Prod. 27, 381<strong>–</strong>391.<br />

BELLOWS R.A., SHORT G.P., KITTO G.P.,<br />

STAIGMILLER R.B., MAC NEIL M.D.,<br />

1990: Influence <strong>of</strong> sire, sex <strong>of</strong> fetus and type <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy on conceptus development. Theriogenology<br />

34, 941<strong>–</strong>954.<br />

BERGER P.J., 1994: Genetic prediction for calving<br />

ease in the United States: Data, models<br />

and use by the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 77:<br />

1146<strong>–</strong>1153.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., 1985b: Wstępne obserwacje<br />

nad przebiegiem ocieleń u krów rasy ncb. Med.<br />

Wet, 3, 174<strong>–</strong>176.<br />

CHOROSZY B., CZAJA H., CHOROSZY Z.,<br />

MAZUR M., 2003: Wyniki odchowu cieląt<br />

rasy simentalskiej w zależności od sezonu urodzenia.<br />

Zesz. Nauk Prz. Hod. 67, 99<strong>–</strong>104.<br />

DICKERSON G.E., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency:<br />

basic concepts. Anim. Prod. 27, 367<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>379.<br />

DOBICKI A., SZULC T., 1995: Modele produkcji<br />

żywca wołowego w wielorasowych stadach<br />

mięsnych w południowo-zachodnim regionie<br />

kraju. Przegląd Hodowlany 4, 1<strong>–</strong>7.<br />

FITZHUGH H.A., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency,<br />

with special reference to the breeding<br />

female. Anim. Prod. 27, 393<strong>–</strong>401.


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> selected factors... 191<br />

JASIOROWSKI H., PRZYSUCHA T., 2004:<br />

Bydło mięsne: wybór rasy. Top Agrar Polska<br />

1, 102<strong>–</strong>104.<br />

JĘDRZEJCZYK H., SZAREK J., ADAMCZYK<br />

K., 2000: Ocena reprodukcji mięsnych ras bydła<br />

hodowanych w Agr<strong>of</strong>irmie Witkowo. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. PTZ 51, 265<strong>–</strong>271.<br />

KRZYWDA W., SZAREK J., GIL Z., ADAM-<br />

CZYK K., BULECA J., 2002: Charakterystyka<br />

wycieleń krów rasy Limousine hodowanych<br />

w Polsce. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech. Supl., 15, 209<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>212.<br />

LASTER D.B., GREGORY K.E., 1973: Factors<br />

influencing peri- and early postnatal calf mortality.<br />

J. Anim. Sci. 37, 1092<strong>–</strong>1102.<br />

MALINOWSKI E., KRZYŻANOWSKI J.,<br />

MURAWSKI J., WRONA Z., ORLIK S.,<br />

1983: Przegląd przypadków ciężkich porodów<br />

u krów. Med. Wet. 39, 6, 367<strong>–</strong>369.<br />

MEIJERING A., 1984: Dystocia and stillbirths in<br />

cattle <strong>–</strong> A review <strong>of</strong> causes, relations and implications.<br />

Livest. Prod. Sci., 11, 143.<br />

MEYER C.L., BERGER P.J., KOEHLER K.J.,<br />

2000: Interactions among factors affecting stillbirth<br />

in Holstein cattle in the United States.<br />

J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2657<strong>–</strong>2663.<br />

MORRIS C.A., WILTON J.W., 1976: The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> body size on the biological efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

cows: A review. Can. Anim. Sci. 56: 613<strong>–</strong>647.<br />

MORRIS C.A., WILTON J.W., 1977: The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> body size on the economic efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

cows. A review. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 45, 39<strong>–</strong>153.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., KLUPCZYŃSKI J., 1999: Przebieg<br />

wycieleń, wielkość i żywotność cieląt<br />

w stadzie bydła mięsnego w Mielnie. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. Prz. Hod. 44, 353<strong>–</strong>363.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., KLUPCZYŃSKI J., MICIŃSKI<br />

J., 2000: Przebieg porodu, wielkość i żywotność<br />

cieląt w zależności od wymiarów ciała<br />

krów. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 27 (3), 43<strong>–</strong>57.<br />

NOTTER D.R., SANDERS J.O., DICKERSON<br />

G.E., 1979: Simulated efficiency <strong>of</strong> beef production<br />

for Midwestern cow-calf-feedlot management<br />

system. II. Mature body size. J. Anim.<br />

Sci. 49, 83<strong>–</strong>91.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976b: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in<br />

Swedish cattle breeds. VI. Effects <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand. 27, 58<strong>–</strong>64.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., 2006: Alternatywa<br />

dla krów mlecznych <strong>–</strong> bydło mięsne<br />

w sytuacji limitowanej produkcji mleka. Bydło<br />

1, 59<strong>–</strong>63.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., BRZOZOW-<br />

SKI P., ZDZIARSKI K., 2005a: Wpływ wybranych<br />

czynników na przebieg porodów krów<br />

rasy limousin. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 61 (9),<br />

1036<strong>–</strong>1038.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ<br />

J., 2005b: Rodzaj porodów krów mięsnych<br />

ras brytyjskich w zależności od masy krowy,<br />

kolejności ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia.<br />

Roczniki Naukowe PTZ, 1, 1, 145<strong>–</strong>150.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ J.,<br />

WRÓBLEWSKA L., 2005c: Wpływ masy krowy,<br />

kolejności ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia<br />

na rodzaj porodu krów rasy charolais. Rocz.<br />

Nauk. Zoot., z. 22/2, 597<strong>–</strong>600.<br />

SIEBER M., FREEMAN A.E., KELLEY D.H.,<br />

1989: Effects <strong>of</strong> body measurements and weight<br />

on calf size and calving difficulty <strong>of</strong> Holsteins.<br />

J. Dairy Sci. 72, 9, 2402<strong>–</strong>2410.<br />

WROŃSKI M., KIJAK Z., MICIŃSKI J., 1996:<br />

Charakterystyka pierwszego w Polsce stada<br />

bydła mięsnego rasy Limousine. Zesz.Nauk.<br />

AR we Wrocławiu XII, 291, 193<strong>–</strong>203.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ wybranych czynników na<br />

żywotność cieląt mięsnych ras bydła limousine<br />

i charolaise. Materiałem do badań były wyniki<br />

oceny użytkowości bydła mięsnego za lata<br />

2000<strong>–</strong>2007, prowadzonej przez Polski Związek<br />

Hodowców i Producentów Bydła Mięsnego. Badaniami<br />

objęto dwie francuskie rasy bydła mięsnego<br />

charolaise i limousine. Oceniano żywotność<br />

rodzących się cieląt w następującej skali: zdrowe,<br />

słabe. Analiza statystyczna obejmowała rozkład<br />

ocen żywotności cieląt w zależności od następujących<br />

czynników: rasa, masa krowy, kolejność<br />

ocielenia, płeć cielęcia, masa cielęcia przy urodzeniu,<br />

sezon ocielenia. Stwierdzono statystycznie<br />

istotne różnice (p ≤ 0,05) w żywotności cieląt<br />

ras charolaise i limousine. Mniejsza żywotność<br />

cieląt rasy charolaise wynika prawdopodobnie<br />

z wyższej frekwencji występowania skomplikowanych<br />

porodów u tej rasy w porównaniu z rasą<br />

limousine. Wraz ze wzrostem masy ciała krowy<br />

przed ocieleniem malał odsetek cieląt o słabej<br />

żywotności. Różnice były statystycznie istotne<br />

((p ≤ 0,05). Badania innych autorów są zgodne<br />

z uzyskanymi wynikami. Stwierdzono, że wraz


192 J. Slósarz et al.<br />

ze wzrostem masy ciała krowy przed ocieleniem<br />

malał odsetek cieląt o słabej żywotności. Różnice<br />

były statystycznie istotne (p ≤ 0,05). Stwierdzono<br />

statystycznie wysoko istotny (p ≤ 0,01) wpływ<br />

płci cielęcia na jego żywotność w okresie odchowu.<br />

Znacznie wyższy odsetek cieląt słabo żywotnych<br />

odnotowano w grupie cieląt buhajków.<br />

Nie stwierdzono istotnego statystycznie wpływu<br />

masy cielęcia przy urodzeniu na jego żywotność,<br />

ale najwięcej cieląt zdrowych (witalnych) było<br />

w grupie o średniej masie ciała przy urodzeniu.<br />

Nie stwierdzono istotnego wpływu sezonu urodzenia<br />

na żywotność cieląt.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

02-786 Warszawa, ul. Ciszewskiego 8<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: jan_slosarz@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 193<strong>–</strong>197<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight and condition score before calving<br />

on calving course <strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows<br />

JAN SLÓSARZ, TOMASZ PRZYSUCHA, HENRYK GRODZKI<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: Infl uence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight and condition<br />

score before calving on calving course <strong>of</strong><br />

Charolaise cows. The aim <strong>of</strong> the research was to<br />

determine the influence <strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows body<br />

weight and condition score (BCS) before calving<br />

on calving course. 81 purebred Charolaise cows<br />

in Poland were the material <strong>of</strong> investigations.<br />

Body condition score was estimated using 9 point<br />

scale according to Richards (24) directly before<br />

planned calving day. The following levels were<br />

used: 1 <strong>–</strong> bad (notes 1, 2, 3), 2 <strong>–</strong> suitable (notes 4,<br />

5, 6, 7), 3 <strong>–</strong> more than enough (notes 8, 9). All the<br />

animals were weighted. The calving course was<br />

qualified to one <strong>of</strong> the following categories: N <strong>–</strong><br />

easy, without any help, T <strong>–</strong> difficult, with farmer’s<br />

help or mechanical means use. The ratio <strong>of</strong> different<br />

calving course <strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows depending<br />

on their body weight and condition (BCS)<br />

just prior to calving was analysed. Correlation coefficient<br />

between calving course and Charolaise<br />

cows BCS was low (r = <strong>–</strong>0.19), but statistically<br />

significant. The highest ratio <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings<br />

was noticed for cows, which body weight not<br />

exceeded 500 kg (33.4%). Together with cow<br />

body weight increase the ratio <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings<br />

decreased. BCS notes 4, 5, 6, 7 were proved as the<br />

optimal (majority <strong>of</strong> calvings were examined as<br />

“suitable”). All <strong>of</strong> calvings from cows with 1, 2, 3<br />

notes had to be assisted.<br />

Key words: Charolaise, calving course, cow body<br />

weight, BCS.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Problem <strong>of</strong> beef cow body weight and<br />

its condition (BCS) just before delivery<br />

has a direct impact on calving quality.<br />

The basic factors influencing calving<br />

course such as: cow age and connected<br />

with it calving number, calf body weight<br />

at birth, calf sex, cow pelvis structure<br />

are well known and described (Berger,<br />

1994; Berger et al., 1992; Brzozowski<br />

et al., 1994; Brzozowski et al., 1998;<br />

Johanson, Berger, 2003; McDermott<br />

et al., 1992; Meyer et al., 2000; Nix et<br />

al., 1998; Nogalski, 2003). There is not<br />

too much information on the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> cow BCS just before calving on its<br />

course. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> beef cows’ BCS<br />

in the different physiological periods,<br />

depending mainly on nutritional level<br />

and system <strong>of</strong> housing, as well as the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> BCS on calving quality in<br />

purebred beef cow population should be<br />

the aim <strong>of</strong> investigations.<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> the study was to determine<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows<br />

body weight and BCS before calving on<br />

calving quality.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

81 purebred Charolaise cows at 4 farms,<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the Polish Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Beef Cattle Breeders and Producers,<br />

were the material <strong>of</strong> investigations. Body<br />

condition score was estimated using 9


194 J. Slósarz, T. Przysucha, H. Grodzki<br />

point scale according to Richards et al.<br />

(1986) directly before planned calving<br />

day. The following levels were used:<br />

1 <strong>–</strong> bad (notes 1, 2, 3), 2 <strong>–</strong> suitable (notes<br />

4, 5, 6, 7), 3 <strong>–</strong> more than enough (notes<br />

8, 9). All the animals were weighted.<br />

The calving course was qualified to one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the following categories: N <strong>–</strong> easy,<br />

without any help, T <strong>–</strong> difficult, with<br />

farmer’s help or mechanical means use.<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> different calving course <strong>of</strong><br />

Charolaise cows depending on their body<br />

weight and condition (BCS) just prior to<br />

calving was analyzed by χ 2 test using<br />

SPSS 12.0 s<strong>of</strong>tware. The delivery course<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charolaise cows depending on BCS<br />

before Calving was determined using<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> variance method. Correlation<br />

coefficient between calving course and<br />

Charolaise cows BCS before calving<br />

was calculated by Spearman method.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> different calving categories<br />

depending on cow body weight before<br />

calving was presented in Table 1. Significant<br />

influence (P ≤ 0.01) <strong>of</strong> cow body<br />

weight on calving quality was noticed.<br />

Along with cow body weight increase the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> assisted deliveries (human<br />

help or mechanical means use) decreased.<br />

In the group <strong>of</strong> the lightest cows the share<br />

<strong>of</strong> difficult calving amounted to 33.4%,<br />

whereas in the group <strong>of</strong> the heaviest ones<br />

it was only 15.4%. The results obtained<br />

are similar to presented by other authors<br />

(Fitzhugh, 1978; Morris, Wilton, 1976;<br />

Notter et al., 1979), who proved, that<br />

the heavier cows have usually less problems<br />

with calvings. However, in other<br />

authors’ research the influence <strong>of</strong> cow<br />

body weight on delivery quality was not<br />

so evident (Andersen, 1978; Dickerson,<br />

1978; Morris, Wilton, 1977).<br />

According to those experiments the<br />

optimal cow body weight and measurements<br />

depend mainly on production<br />

system, and the benefits resulting from<br />

the lower frequency <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings<br />

in big calibre and higher weight cows<br />

could be equalize by the higher costs <strong>of</strong><br />

their basic maintenance requirements.<br />

TABLE 1. Calving course type evaluation depending on cow body weight before calving<br />

Calving course type<br />

Cow body weight (kg)<br />

N/%<br />

N<br />

easy<br />

T<br />

difficult<br />

Total<br />

≤ 500<br />

N 8 4 12<br />

% 66.6 33.4 100.0<br />

501<strong>–</strong>600<br />

N 12 4 16<br />

% 75.0 25.0 100.0<br />

601<strong>–</strong>700<br />

N 18 6 24<br />

% 75.0 25.0 100.0<br />

701<strong>–</strong>800<br />

N 12 4 16<br />

% 75.0 25.0 100.0<br />

> 800<br />

N 11 2 13<br />

% 84.6 15.4 100.0<br />

Total<br />

N 61 20 81<br />

% 75.3 24.7 100.0<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> differences χ 2 = 0.45 P ≤ 0.01


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight and condition score... 195<br />

Calving course type evaluation depending<br />

on cow condition before calving was<br />

presented in Table 2. Statistically significant<br />

(P ≤ 0.01) influence <strong>of</strong> BCS <strong>of</strong><br />

Charolaise cows before Calving on the<br />

delivery quality was noticed. All <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cows with BCS before calving assessed<br />

as “bad” (notes 1, 2, 3) had problems at<br />

calving and required farmer’s help or<br />

mechanical means use. Similarly, the<br />

majority (71.4%) <strong>of</strong> cows with BCS notes<br />

8, 9 (“more than enough”) also required<br />

farmer’s help or mechanical means use.<br />

BCS notes 4, 5, 6, 7 were proved as the<br />

optimal (88.2%. <strong>of</strong> calvings were examined<br />

as “suitable”).<br />

Many authors (Meijering, 1984;<br />

Nogalski, 2004a; Przysucha et al., 2005;<br />

Weiher et al., 1992) emphasized the close<br />

association <strong>of</strong> cow BCS with its delivery<br />

quality. BCS evaluated as “more than<br />

enough” causes over-fattening <strong>of</strong> pelvic<br />

area and cow decreases the readiness to<br />

take delivery efforts, which results in difficult<br />

calving frequency increase (Nogalski<br />

,2004b; Ruciński, 1998). Pogorzelska<br />

and Szarek (2002) reported, that cows,<br />

and especially heifers, <strong>of</strong> “more than<br />

enough” BCS in round-delivery period<br />

usually had assisted or even difficult<br />

deliveries. It should be also noticed, that<br />

cows <strong>of</strong> different BCS before calving<br />

had the longer service period before the<br />

next pregnancy (Corah, 1989; Whitman<br />

et al., 1975). In spite <strong>of</strong> the appropriate<br />

protein and energy level in the feeding<br />

ration, providing <strong>of</strong> suitable minerals<br />

and vitamins is also very important for<br />

calving course. Their shortage could<br />

be one <strong>of</strong> the reasons <strong>of</strong> disorders and<br />

complications during delivery as well<br />

as higher mortality <strong>of</strong> newborn calves<br />

(Pogorzelska et al., 1998; Pogorzelska,<br />

Szarek, 2002). Periodic feedstuff shortages,<br />

improper ration balance (protein<br />

to energy ration) as well as metabolic<br />

diseases are the most common reasons<br />

<strong>of</strong> bad BCS <strong>of</strong> the cow, and in effect <strong>–</strong><br />

difficult deliveries increase. The calving<br />

course <strong>of</strong> cows, and especially heifers,<br />

is negatively influenced not only by too<br />

good, but also by too poor condition<br />

(Nogalski, 2004b; Philipsson, 1976).<br />

Correlation coefficient between calving<br />

course and Charolaise cows BCS<br />

calculated in presented study was low<br />

(r = <strong>–</strong>0.19), but negatively significantly<br />

correlated with their condition score.<br />

TABLE 2. Calving course type evaluation depending on cow condition before calving<br />

Calving course type<br />

Cow condition before calving N/%<br />

N<br />

easy<br />

T<br />

difficult<br />

Total<br />

Bad<br />

N 0 7 7<br />

% 0.0 100.0 100.0<br />

Good<br />

N 59 8 67<br />

% 88.2 11.8 100.0<br />

Too good<br />

N 2 5 7<br />

% 28.6 71.4 100.0<br />

Total<br />

N 61 20 81<br />

% 75.3 24.7 100.0<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> differences χ 2 = 50.24 P ≤ 0.01


196 J. Slósarz, T. Przysucha, H. Grodzki<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Summarizing, it should be stated, that<br />

the optimal BCS <strong>of</strong> cows before calving<br />

should be 5, 6 and 7 points (according to<br />

Richards et al. (1986) scale), when the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> deliveries was assessed as<br />

easy.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the cows with BCS before calving<br />

assessed as “bad” (notes 1, 2, 3) had problems<br />

at calving and required farmer’s help<br />

or mechanical means use. Similarly, the<br />

majority (71.4%) <strong>of</strong> cows with BCS notes<br />

8, 9 (“more than enough”) also required<br />

farmer’s help or mechanical means use.<br />

BCS notes 4, 5, 6, 7 were proved as the<br />

optimal (88.2%. <strong>of</strong> calvings were examined<br />

as “suitable”).<br />

Correlation coefficient between calving<br />

course and Charolaise cows BCS<br />

calculated in presented study was low<br />

(r = <strong>–</strong>0.19), but negatively significantly<br />

correlated with their condition score.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ANDERSEN B.B., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency,<br />

with special reference to growth and<br />

feed conversion in cattle. Anim. Prod., 27,<br />

381<strong>–</strong>391.<br />

BERGER P.J., 1994: Genetic prediction for calving<br />

ease in the United States: Data, models<br />

and use by the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci., 77,<br />

1146<strong>–</strong>1153.<br />

BERGER P.J., CUBAS, A.C., KOEHLER K.J.,<br />

HEALEY M.H., 1992: Factors affecting distocia<br />

and early calf mortality in Angus cows and<br />

heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 70, 1775<strong>–</strong>1786.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., REKLEWSKA B.,<br />

GRABOWSKI R., SZYMCZYKIEWICZ D.,<br />

BALCERZAK K., 1994: Influence <strong>of</strong> calving<br />

difficulty on productivity and fertility <strong>of</strong> cows<br />

from rotational crossbreeding. Pr. Mat. Zoot.,<br />

45, 35<strong>–</strong>41.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., REKLEWSKA B., ZDZIAR-<br />

SKI K., 1998: Zależność między przebiegiem<br />

porodów a wymiarami ciała cieląt pochodzących<br />

z krzyżowania rotacyjnego. Pr. Mat.<br />

Zoot., 52, 61<strong>–</strong>69.<br />

CORAH L.R., 1989: Low calf nutrition. Agri-<br />

-Practice, 10, 27.<br />

DICKERSON G.E., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency:<br />

basic concepts. Anim. Prod., 27, 367<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>379.<br />

FITZHUGH H.A., 1978: <strong>Animal</strong> size and efficiency,<br />

with special reference to the breeding<br />

female. Anim. Prod., 27, 393<strong>–</strong>401.<br />

JOHANSON J.M., BERGER P.J., 2003: Birth<br />

weight as a predictor <strong>of</strong> calving ease and perinatal<br />

mortality in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci.,<br />

86, 3745<strong>–</strong>3755.<br />

McDERMOTT J.J., ALEN O.B., MARTIN S.W.,<br />

ALVES D.M., 1992: Patterns <strong>of</strong> stillbirth and<br />

dystocia in Ontario cow-calf herds. Canad. J.<br />

Vet. Res., 56, 47<strong>–</strong>55.<br />

MEIJERING A., 1984: Dystocia and stillbirths in<br />

cattle <strong>–</strong> A review <strong>of</strong> causes, relations and implications.<br />

Livest. Prod. Sci., 11, 143.<br />

MEYER C.L., BERGER P.J., KOEHLER K.J.,<br />

2000: Interactions among factors affecting stillbirth<br />

in Holstein cattle in the United States.<br />

J. Dairy Sci., 83, 2657<strong>–</strong>2663.<br />

MORRIS C.A., WILTON J.W., 1976: The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> body size on the biological efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

cows: A review. Can. Anim. Sci., 56: 613<strong>–</strong>647.<br />

MORRIS C.A., WILTON J.W., 1977: The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> body size on the economic efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> cows. A review. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 45,<br />

39<strong>–</strong>153.<br />

NIX J.M., SPITZER J.C., GRIMES L.W.,<br />

PLYLER B.B., 1998: A retrospective analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> factors contributing to calf mortality and<br />

dystocia in beef cattle. Theriogenology, 49,<br />

1515<strong>–</strong>1523.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2003: Relations between the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> parturition, body weights and measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> Holstein-Friesian calves. Czech J. Anim.<br />

Sci., 48, 2, 51<strong>–</strong>59.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004a: Tempo wzrostu jałówek<br />

rasy czarno-białej a ich wymiary ciała i przebieg<br />

porodu. Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod. 74, 165<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>173.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004b: Zootechniczne uwarunkowania<br />

jakości porodu jałówek i krów czarno-białych.<br />

Rozpr. i Monogr., 101, UWM<br />

Olsztyn.<br />

NOTTER D.R., SANDERS J.O., DICKERSON<br />

G.E., 1979: Simulated efficiency <strong>of</strong> beef pro-


Infl uence <strong>of</strong> cow body weight and condition score... 197<br />

duction for Midwestern cow-calf-feedlot management<br />

system. II. Mature body size. J. Anim.<br />

Sci., 49, 83<strong>–</strong>91.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. II. Effects on Non-genetic factors.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand., 26, 165<strong>–</strong>174.<br />

POGORZELSKA J., ROMANOWSKI A., PU-<br />

CHAJDA Z., 1998: Analiza użytkowania rozpłodowego<br />

i rozwój importowanego z Francji<br />

bydła limousine i charolaise. Zesz. Nauk. AR<br />

Wrocław, 336, 143<strong>–</strong>148.<br />

POGORZELSKA J., SZAREK J., 2002: Porównanie<br />

wyników rozrodu krów i odchowu cieląt<br />

w stadzie rasy hereford utrzymywanych w różnych<br />

warunkach środowiskowych. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Przegl. Hod., 62, 193<strong>–</strong>202.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., BRZOZOWSKI<br />

P., ZDZIARSKI K., 2005: Wpływ wybranych<br />

czynników na przebieg porodów krów rasy<br />

limousin. Medycyna Wet., 61, 1036<strong>–</strong>1038.<br />

RICHARDS M.W., SPITZER J.C., WARNER<br />

M.B., 1986: Effect <strong>of</strong> varying levels <strong>of</strong> postpartum<br />

nutrition and body condition at calving on<br />

subsequent reproductive performance in beef<br />

cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 62, 300<strong>–</strong>306.<br />

RUCIŃSKI P., 1998: Wybrane aspekty żywienia<br />

krów mięsnych. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław, 336,<br />

75<strong>–</strong>101.<br />

WEIHER O., HOFFMANN G., SASS D., 1992:<br />

Untersuchungen ueber Beziehungen zwischen<br />

Beckeninnen <strong>–</strong> und Beckenaussenmassen bei<br />

Schwarzbuntkuehen. Dt. Tierarztl. Wschr., 99,<br />

433<strong>–</strong>472.<br />

WHITMAN R.W., REMMENGA E.E., WILT-<br />

BANK J.N., 1975: Weight change, condition<br />

and beef cow reproduction. J. Anim. Sci., 41,<br />

387.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ masy ciała i kondycji krów<br />

rasy charolaise przed ocieleniem na rodzaj porodu.<br />

Celem badań było określenie wpływu masy<br />

ciała i kondycji przed ocieleniem krów rasy charolaise,<br />

jednej z najbardziej popularnej rasy bydła<br />

mięsnego w Polsce, na rodzaj porodu. Badaniami<br />

objęto 81 czystorasowych krów rasy charolaise<br />

w Polsce. Kondycję w 9-punktowej skali<br />

Richardsa oceniano bezpośrednio przed planowanym<br />

terminem porodu. Przyjęto następujący<br />

system oceny: 1 <strong>–</strong> zła (noty 1, 2, 3), 2 <strong>–</strong> odpowiednia<br />

(noty 4, 5, 6, 7), 3 <strong>–</strong> zbyt dobra (noty 8,<br />

9). Wszystkie oceniane zwierzęta były dodatkowo<br />

ważone. Oceniano przebieg porodu badanych<br />

krów poprzez zakwalifikowanie go do jednej<br />

z następujących kategorii: N <strong>–</strong> łatwy, odbyty siłami<br />

natury, bez pomocy człowieka, T <strong>–</strong> trudny,<br />

z pomocą człowieka lub środków mechanicznych.<br />

Analizowano rozkłady ocen rodzaju porodu<br />

krów rasy charolaise w zależności od przedziału<br />

masy ciała i kondycji krowy przed ocieleniem.<br />

Współczynnik korelacji między oceną rodzaju<br />

porodu a kondycją krów rasy charolaise w okresie<br />

ocielenia był niski (r = <strong>–</strong>0,19), lecz statystycznie<br />

istotny. Najwięcej trudnych ocieleń zanotowano<br />

w grupie krów o masie ciała nie przekraczającej<br />

500 kg (33,4%). Wraz ze wzrostem masy ciała<br />

krowy malał odsetek porodów malał odsetek<br />

porodów wymagających pomocy człowieka lub<br />

użycia środków mechanicznych. Za optymalne<br />

oceny kondycji krów przed ocieleniem w 9-stopniowej<br />

skali Richardsa [24] należy uznać oceny<br />

5, 6 i 7 pkt., przy których znaczna większość porodów<br />

miała przebieg łatwy, a wszystkie krowy,<br />

których kondycję przed porodem oceniono na 1,<br />

2, 3 punkty miały problemy z ocieleniem i wymagały<br />

pomocy człowieka.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

02-786 Warszawa, ul. Ciszewskiego 8<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: jan_slosarz@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 199<strong>–</strong>204<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving course in commercial<br />

crossing <strong>of</strong> black and white cows with blonde d’aquitaine bulls<br />

JAN SLÓSARZ, TOMASZ PRZYSUCHA, HENRYK GRODZKI<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Cattle Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: The infl uence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving<br />

course in commercial crossing <strong>of</strong> black and<br />

white cows with blonde d’aquitaine bulls. The aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> presented study was to indicate the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving course in commercial<br />

crossing <strong>of</strong> black and white cows with blonde<br />

d’aquitaine bulls. The calving number did not influenced<br />

the calving course, but the most difficult<br />

deliveries were noticed for the heifers and cows<br />

delivered the second calf. All the cows examined<br />

as “bad” and “suitable” according to the condition<br />

score were assisted during delivery. The influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> calf body weight at birth on calving course was<br />

not proved, but the most difficult calvings were<br />

observed when the birth weight was higher than<br />

40 kg. The obtained results show the extraordinary<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> blonde d’aquitaine for commercial<br />

crossing with the dairy cows.<br />

Key words: commercial crossing, calving course,<br />

blonde d’aquitaine.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

At the production conditions <strong>of</strong> the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> European countries, where milk<br />

production is the main goal, commercial<br />

crossing <strong>of</strong> dairy cows with specialized<br />

beef bulls is and would be the main way<br />

<strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> quantity and quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> beef production.<br />

It especially concerns Poland, where<br />

the population <strong>of</strong> purebred beef cows<br />

amounts to only about 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total cow population. In such case the<br />

commercial crossing <strong>of</strong> 20<strong>–</strong>30% <strong>of</strong> dairy<br />

cows with specialized beef bulls would<br />

be a great chance to produce good quality<br />

crossbred calves.<br />

Many authors dealing with beef production<br />

emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

calving course influencing beef production<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Difficult deliveries<br />

cause the meaningful financial losses<br />

due to the high ratio <strong>of</strong> stillborn calves,<br />

higher labour needs, veterinary costs,<br />

worse reproduction indices etc.<br />

It was proved by many authors, that<br />

the problem <strong>of</strong> difficult calvings in the<br />

commercial crossing is comparable or<br />

even lower than that in purebred herds<br />

<strong>of</strong> Holstein cows, where the ratio <strong>of</strong> difficult<br />

deliveries amounts to about 15% in<br />

heifers and about 8<strong>–</strong>10% in older cows.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> presented study was to indicate<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors like<br />

cow age, calving number, cow BCS, calf<br />

sex and body weight at birth on calving<br />

course in commercial crossing <strong>of</strong> black<br />

and white cows with blonde d’aquitaine<br />

bulls.<br />

Blonde d’aquitaine breed as the paternal<br />

component in commercial crossing<br />

with dairy cows was described in Table 1<br />

(Grodzki (red.), 2009).


200 J. Slósarz, T. Przysucha, H. Grodzki<br />

TABLE 1. Blonde d’aquitaine bulls in commercial crossing with dairy cows<br />

Suitability for crossbreeding<br />

Crossbred coat colour<br />

Crossbred body weight at birth<br />

Calving course<br />

Calves vitality<br />

Crossbred suitability for fattening<br />

Dressing percentage<br />

Meat quality<br />

Dairy cows suitability for crossing<br />

Remarks<br />

<strong>–</strong> high <br />

<strong>–</strong> crossbreds could be fattened to the high body weight without<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> over-fattening<br />

<strong>–</strong> from dark bronze to black<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (35<strong>–</strong>45 kg)<br />

<strong>–</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> self-calvings<br />

<strong>–</strong> if possible deliveries should be monitored<br />

<strong>–</strong> low percentage <strong>of</strong> stillbirths and early mortality<br />

<strong>–</strong> very good, high daily body weight gains, good feedstuff<br />

utilization, excellent muscularity, bulging, wide muscles<br />

<strong>–</strong> high (usually over 60%), but bone share in carcass not lower<br />

than in Black and White bulls<br />

<strong>–</strong> high<br />

<strong>–</strong> heifers and cows <strong>of</strong> smaller calibre could be used<br />

<strong>–</strong> rossbreds need some better husbandry conditions than the<br />

crossbreds with other beef breeds<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Data from “Cow calving course sheet”<br />

especially prepared by the field technicians<br />

from Mazovian Center for Breeding<br />

& Reproduction Co Ltd. (Mazowieckie<br />

Centrum Hodowli i Rozrodu Zwierząt<br />

Sp. z o.o.) in Łowicz constituted the material<br />

for investigation. They concerned<br />

105 deliveries <strong>of</strong> black and white cows<br />

serviced with blonde d’aquitaine bulls.<br />

The 105 deliveries were divided into the<br />

following groups: (1) easy, not assisted,<br />

(2) difficult, (3) very difficult, (4) cessarian<br />

section.<br />

Calving course dependences on: cow<br />

age, calving number (2, 3, 4, 5, ...), cow<br />

BCS (1 <strong>–</strong> too good, 2 <strong>–</strong> suitable, 3 <strong>–</strong> bad),<br />

calf sex (1 <strong>–</strong> heifer-calf, 2 <strong>–</strong> bull-calf),<br />

calf body weight at birth (kg) were<br />

assessed by Pearson χ 2 test using SPSS<br />

ver. 10.0 pl s<strong>of</strong>ware.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

In Table 2 calving course ratio depending<br />

on calving number was showed. There<br />

was no statistically significant influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> calving number on delivery course, but<br />

more difficult calvings were observed in<br />

the group <strong>of</strong> heifers and young cows<br />

giving birth for the second time.<br />

Publications presented by many<br />

authors (Philipsson, 1976a; Philipsson,<br />

1976b; Sieber et al., 1989; Nogalski,<br />

Klupczyński, 1999; Krzywda et al., 2002;<br />

Albera et al., 2004; Przysucha et al.,<br />

2005b; Przysucha et al., 2006) proved,<br />

that cow age and connected with it calving<br />

number highly influenced difficult<br />

calvings frequency. Difficult calving<br />

occurred much more <strong>of</strong>ten in primiparous<br />

cows than in multiparous ones. The<br />

main reason <strong>of</strong> delivery problems in<br />

primiparous cows is insufficient pelvic<br />

area (Wrona et al., 2001). Such problems<br />

also <strong>of</strong>ten take place in cows giving birth<br />

for the second time. It is connected with<br />

the smallest body measurements and<br />

not complete delivery <strong>of</strong> the sceleton <strong>of</strong><br />

younger cows (Berger, 1994; Meyer et<br />

al., 2000). The most frequent reason <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery problems in primiparous cows is


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving course... 201<br />

not sufficient development <strong>of</strong> the reproductive<br />

duct (Philipsson, 1976c; Nogalski,<br />

2004a; Nogalski, 2004c; Przysucha<br />

et al., 2005a; Przysucha et al., 2005b).<br />

Cows delivering for 4<strong>–</strong>5 time usually<br />

have slight problems during delivery.<br />

Breeders, who decided to start the reproductive<br />

use <strong>of</strong> beef breed heifers in the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 15 month (the first delivery in the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 2 years) must consider 3<strong>–</strong>4 time<br />

higher risk <strong>of</strong> difficult calving occurrence<br />

than in case <strong>of</strong> heifers calving in the age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 years.<br />

Table 3 shows calving course ratio<br />

depending on cow BCS. All the cows,<br />

which BCS was described as “bad” (3)<br />

needed assistance during the delivery.<br />

According to Nogalski (2004b) too good<br />

BCS increase delivery difficult cases.<br />

Study provided by Pogorzelska and Szarek<br />

(2002) confirmed that tendention.<br />

In Table 4 calving course ratio depending<br />

on calf body weight at birth was<br />

shown. It was a surprise, that delivery<br />

course was not significantly influenced<br />

by calf body weight at birth, but the<br />

most deliveries needing assistance were<br />

when the calf body weight at birth was<br />

over 40 kg. Obtained results are confirmed<br />

by many authors (Colburn et al.,<br />

1997; Pogorzelska et al., 1999; Stąporek,<br />

Ziemiński, 2000; Nogalski, 2002).<br />

Table 5 shows calving course ratio<br />

depending on calf sex. Surprisingly statistically<br />

significant influence <strong>of</strong> that factor<br />

on delivery course was not observed. Calf<br />

TABLE 2. Calving course ratio depending on calving number<br />

Trait<br />

Calving number<br />

Average<br />

χ2 = 0.030, not significant<br />

1 and 2<br />

≥ 3<br />

N<br />

Calving course<br />

% easy difficult total<br />

N 19 2 21<br />

% 90.5 9.5 100.0<br />

N 77 7 84<br />

% 91.7 8.3 100.0<br />

N 96 9 105<br />

% 91.4 8.6 100.0<br />

TABLE 3. Calving course ratio depending on cow BCS<br />

Trait<br />

Cow BCS<br />

Average<br />

χ 2 = 67.893, P ≤ 0.01<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

N<br />

Calving course<br />

% easy difficult total<br />

N 27 1 28<br />

% 96.4 3.6 100.0<br />

N 69 2 71<br />

% 97.2 2.8 100.0<br />

N 0 6 6<br />

% 0.0 100.0 100.0<br />

N 96 9 105<br />

% 91.4 8.6 100.0


202 J. Slósarz, T. Przysucha, H. Grodzki<br />

TABLE 4. Calving course ratio depending on calf body weight at birth<br />

Trait<br />

Calf body weight<br />

at birth<br />

(kg)<br />

Average<br />

χ 2 = 2.405, not significant<br />

≤ 35<br />

36<strong>–</strong>40<br />

> 40<br />

TABLE 5. Calving course ratio depending on calf sex<br />

Trait<br />

Calf sex<br />

Average<br />

χ 2 = 0.143, not significant<br />

♀<br />

♂<br />

N<br />

Calving course<br />

% easy difficult total<br />

N 17 1 18<br />

% 94.4 5.6 100.0<br />

N 40 2 42<br />

% 95.2 4.8 100.0<br />

N 38 6 44<br />

% 86.4 13.6 100.0<br />

N 95 9 104<br />

% 91.3 8.7 100.0<br />

N<br />

Calving course<br />

% easy difficult total<br />

N 47 5 52<br />

% 90.4 9.6 100.0<br />

N 49 4 53<br />

% 92.5 7.5 100.0<br />

N 96 9 105<br />

% 91.4 8.6 100.0<br />

sex is described among the few most<br />

important factors influencing delivery<br />

quality. Lower body weight at birth <strong>of</strong><br />

heifer calves decrease cases <strong>of</strong> assisted<br />

calvings (Malinowski et al., 1983; Brzozowski,<br />

1985; Bellows et al., 1990;<br />

Przysucha et al., 2005a; Przysucha et al.,<br />

2005b).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Summarizing it should be stated, that:<br />

1. The calving number did not influenced<br />

the calving course, but the most difficult<br />

deliveries were noticed for the<br />

heifers and cows delivered the second<br />

calf.<br />

2. All the cows examined in BCS scale as<br />

“bad” (3) and “suitable” (2) were assisted<br />

during delivery.<br />

3. The influence <strong>of</strong> calf body weight<br />

at birth on calving course was not<br />

proved, but the most difficult calvings<br />

were observed when the birth weight<br />

was higher than 40 kg.<br />

4. The obtained results show the extraordinary<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> blonde d’aquitaine<br />

for commercial crossing with the dairy<br />

cows.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ALBERA A., CARNIER P., GROEN A.F., 2004:<br />

Definition <strong>of</strong> a breeding goal for the Piemontese<br />

breed: economic and biological values and<br />

their sensitivity to production circumstances.<br />

Livest. Prod. Sci. 89, 66<strong>–</strong>77.<br />

BELLOWS R.A., SHORT G.P., KITTO G.P.,<br />

STAIGMILLER R.B., MAC NEIL M.D.,<br />

1990: Influence <strong>of</strong> sire, sex <strong>of</strong> fetus and type <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy on conceptus development. Theriogenology<br />

34, 941<strong>–</strong>954.


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> chosen factors on calving course... 203<br />

BERGER P.J., 1994: Genetic prediction for calving<br />

ease in the United States: Data, models<br />

and use by the dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 77:<br />

1146<strong>–</strong>1153.<br />

BRZOZOWSKI P., 1985: Wstępne obserwacje<br />

nad przebiegiem ocieleń u krów rasy ncb. Med.<br />

Wet. 3, 174<strong>–</strong>176.<br />

COLBURN J., DEUTSCHER H.G., NIELSEN<br />

K.M., ADAMS C.D., 1997: Effects <strong>of</strong> sire, dam<br />

traits, calf traits and environment on dystocia<br />

and subsequent reproduction <strong>of</strong> two-year-old<br />

heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 1452<strong>–</strong>1460.<br />

GRODZKI H. (red.), 2009: Chów bydła mięsnego.<br />

Praca zbiorowa. Wielkopolskie Wydawnictwo<br />

Rolnicze, Poznań, 1<strong>–</strong>184.<br />

KRZYWDA W., SZAREK J., GIL Z., ADAM-<br />

CZYK K., BULECA J., 2002: Charakterystyka<br />

wycieleń krów rasy Limousine hodowanych<br />

w Polsce. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech. Supl., 15, 209<strong>–</strong>212.<br />

MALINOWSKI E., KRZYŻANOWSKI J.,<br />

MURAWSKI J., WRONA Z., ORLIK S.,<br />

1983: Przegląd przypadków ciężkich porodów<br />

u krów. Med. Wet. 39, 6, 367<strong>–</strong>369.<br />

MEYER C.L., BERGER P.J., KOEHLER K.J.,<br />

2000: Interactions among factors affecting<br />

stillbirth in Holstein cattle in the United States.<br />

J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2657<strong>–</strong>2663.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2002: Effect <strong>of</strong> selected factors<br />

on the course <strong>of</strong> parturition in holstein-fresian<br />

heifers. Journal <strong>of</strong> Polish Agricultural Universities,<br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Husbandry 5, 2 http://www.<br />

ejpau.media.pl/series/volume5/issue2/animal/<br />

art-03.html<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004a: Wpływ wieku przy pierwszym<br />

wycieleniu na efektywność użytkowania<br />

krów rasy holsztyńsko-fryzyjskiej. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Prz. Hod. 72, 1, 77<strong>–</strong>83.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004b: Tempo wzrostu jałówek<br />

rasy czarno-białej a ich wymiary ciała i przebieg<br />

porodu. Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod. 74, 165<strong>–</strong>173.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., 2004c: Zootechniczne uwarunkowania<br />

jakości porodu jałówek i krów czarnobiałych.<br />

Rozpr. i Monogr. 101, UWM Olsztyn.<br />

NOGALSKI Z., KLUPCZYŃSKI J., 1999: Przebieg<br />

wycieleń, wielkość i żywotność cieląt<br />

w stadzie bydła mięsnego w Mielnie. Zesz.<br />

Nauk. Prz. Hod. 44, 353<strong>–</strong>363.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976a: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. VI. Effects <strong>of</strong> crossbreeding. Acta<br />

Agric. Scand. 27, 58<strong>–</strong>64.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976b: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. V. Effects <strong>of</strong> calving performance<br />

and stillbirth in Swedish Friesian heifers on productivity<br />

in the subsequent lactation. Acta Agric.<br />

Scand. 26, 230<strong>–</strong>234.<br />

PHILIPSSON J., 1976c: Studies on calving difficulty,<br />

stillbirth and associated factors in Swedish<br />

cattle breeds. II. Effects on Non-genetic factors.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand. 26, 165<strong>–</strong>174.<br />

POGORZELSKA J., KIJAK Z., TARCZYŃSKI<br />

R., 1999: Analiza użytkowania rozpłodowego<br />

i wyniki odchowu potomstwa rasy hereford<br />

importowanego z Danii. Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod.<br />

44, 389<strong>–</strong>395.<br />

POGORZELSKA J., SZAREK J., 2002: Porównanie<br />

wyników rozrodu krów i odchowu cieląt<br />

w stadzie rasy hereford utrzymywanych w różnych<br />

warunkach środowiskowych. Zesz. Nauk.<br />

Prz. Hod. 62, 193<strong>–</strong>202.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., BRZOZOW-<br />

SKI P., ZDZIARSKI K., 2005a: Wpływ wybranych<br />

czynników na przebieg porodów krów<br />

rasy limousin. Med. Wet. 61 (9), 1036<strong>–</strong>1038.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ J.,<br />

NAŁĘCZ-TARWACKA T., 2006: Przebieg<br />

porodów krów włoskiej rasy Piemontese w zależności<br />

od masy krowy, kolejności i sezonu<br />

ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia. Acta Sci.<br />

Pol. Zootech. 52, 87<strong>–</strong>94.<br />

PRZYSUCHA T., GRODZKI H., SLÓSARZ J.,<br />

2005b: Rodzaj porodów krów mięsnych ras brytyjskich<br />

w zależności od masy krowy, kolejności<br />

ocielenia oraz płci i masy cielęcia. Roczniki<br />

Naukowe PTZ, 1, 1, 145<strong>–</strong>150.<br />

SIEBER M., FREEMAN A.E., KELLEY D.H.,<br />

1989: Effects <strong>of</strong> body measurements and<br />

weight on calf size and calving difficulty <strong>of</strong><br />

Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 9, 2402<strong>–</strong>2410.<br />

STĄPOREK K., ZIEMIŃSKI R., 2000: Hodowla<br />

bydła rasy limousine w zachodniej Polsce.<br />

Przegląd Hodowlany 7, 3<strong>–</strong>5.<br />

WRONA Z., KRZYŻANOWSKI J., KRAKOW-<br />

SKI L., ŹREBIEC G., 2001: Przebieg porodów<br />

u krzyżówek mięsnych bydła rasy polskiej<br />

czarno-białej i piemonckiej. Med. Wet. 57, 6,<br />

420<strong>–</strong>422.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ wybranych czynników na<br />

przebieg porodów w krzyżowaniu towarowym krów<br />

cb z buhajami rasy blonde d’aquitaine. Celem


204 J. Slósarz, T. Przysucha, H. Grodzki<br />

prezentowanej pracy było określenie wpływu<br />

wybranych czynników, takich jak: wiek krowy,<br />

kolejność ocielenia, kondycja krowy, płeć cielęcia<br />

oraz masa cielęcia przy urodzeniu, na przebieg porodów<br />

w krzyżowaniu towarowym krów cb z buhajami<br />

rasy blonde d’aquitane. Nie stwierdzono<br />

statystycznie istotnego wpływu numeru ocielenia<br />

na przebieg porodu, ale więcej trudnych porodów<br />

było w grupie pierwiastek i krów cielących się<br />

po raz drugi. Wszystkie krowy, których kondycję<br />

oceniono jako „dostateczna” i „zła” wymagały<br />

pomocy przy porodzie. Nie stwierdzono istotnego<br />

wpływu masy ciała cielęcia przy urodzeniu na<br />

rodzaj porodu, ale najwięcej trudnych porodów,<br />

wymagających asysty hodowcy, zaobserwowano<br />

przy masie cielęcia przekraczającej 40 kg. Nie<br />

stwierdzono statystycznie istotnego wpływu badanego<br />

czynnika na rodzaj porodu. Uzyskane w prezentowanej<br />

pracy wyniki potwierdzają wybitną<br />

przydatność rasy blonde d’aquitane do krzyżowania<br />

towarowego z krowami mlecznymi.<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Katedra Szczegółowej Hodowli Zwierząt <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

02-786 Warszawa, ul. Ciszewskiego 8<br />

Poland<br />

e-mail: jan_slosarz@sggw.pl


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 205<strong>–</strong>212<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in three subspecies <strong>of</strong> leopard<br />

(Panthera pardus)<br />

TOMASZ STERNICKI 1 , KATARZYNA GÓRAL 2 , WANDA OLECH 2 ,<br />

TOMASZ SZWACZKOWSKI 1<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> Poznań<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

Abstract: The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in three subspecies<br />

<strong>of</strong> leopard (Panthera pardus). The estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> inbreeding level is one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

task in captive breeding. The rising <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

coefficient can caused reduction <strong>of</strong> traits value. It<br />

caused deterioration <strong>of</strong> trait connected with reproduction<br />

and immunity. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper was<br />

to estimate the level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding coefficient and<br />

its changes in time within three leopard Panthera<br />

pardus captive populations: Panthera pardus japonensis,<br />

Panthera pardus saxicolor and Panthera<br />

pardus orientalis. All subspecies are included in<br />

European Endangered Species Programme (EEP).<br />

The material for analysis was pedigree data taken<br />

from the ISIS data base covered information about<br />

animals born between year 1915 and 2003. The<br />

inbreeding coefficient was calculated using additive<br />

matrix method. In the first years (until 1979)<br />

average inbreeding was on the high level reaching<br />

the 0.25. Specimens born in the last period (2001<strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>–</strong>2003) have smaller inbreeding average on the<br />

level 0.043. The percentage <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens<br />

within subspecies was equal to: 13.1% (japonensis),<br />

24.7% (orientalis) and 28.6% (saxicolor).<br />

Key words: captive population, inbreeding coefficient.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In almost every small size population any<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> selection, natural or artificial one,<br />

is connected with the risk <strong>of</strong> the raising<br />

homozygosity and, in consequence, the<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> lethal and semilethal alleles<br />

(Laikre et al., 1996). Genes identical by<br />

the origin are duplicates <strong>of</strong> given allele<br />

(Nowicki, 1985) from one or more<br />

common ancestors. For estimating genetic<br />

similarity caused by identical alleles<br />

between two individuals the relationship<br />

coefficient is used, but to measure the<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> homozygosity <strong>of</strong> one specimen<br />

the inbreed coefficient is applied.<br />

Genetic similarity is being measured<br />

with reference to the average level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

homozygosity in the population (Gibson,<br />

Van Arendonk, 1998). Calculating the<br />

inbreeding coefficient as probability <strong>of</strong><br />

appearing identical alleles lets determine<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> rising homozygosity within<br />

the population. However this method<br />

approach is closely associated with the<br />

pedigree data accessibility and its accuracy.<br />

In case that probant’s parents are<br />

unknown, the inbreeding coefficient is<br />

assumed to be zero (Leroy et al., 2005). In<br />

some cases an average level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

can be estimated to all population.<br />

Three main approaches <strong>of</strong> estimating<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> inbreeding are known: methods<br />

based on a pedigree data (Wright, 1922;<br />

Quaas, 1976), methods based on the<br />

effective population size (Wright, 1931)


206 T. Sternicki et al.<br />

and measurements <strong>of</strong> the genetic polymorphism<br />

on the molecular level (Zhu et<br />

al., 1996; Keller et al., 2001).<br />

However methods using pedigree data<br />

could be divided into two approaches.<br />

First <strong>of</strong> them is searching the pedigree<br />

backwards usually reduces the number <strong>of</strong><br />

included generations and in consequence<br />

some common ancestor are not considered<br />

(Olech, 2003). The second using<br />

relatives additive matrix with lines and<br />

columns matching to individuals (Quaas,<br />

1976) is starting from the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

pedigree, and taking into account all<br />

relation within the population. Another<br />

approach is estimating the fragmentary<br />

inbreeding coefficient (Hedrick, 1987),<br />

understood as the probability that the<br />

individual is a homozygote in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the given set <strong>of</strong> alleles with reference<br />

to the selected ancestor. Calculating the<br />

fragmentary inbred rate it is being used<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> specimens, about which we<br />

have pedigree detailed information or<br />

when it is appearing more than one type<br />

inbreeding <strong>of</strong> population (e.g. on the<br />

lines). This method is being used in all<br />

large populations (Hedrick, 1987).<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> conservation breeding calculations<br />

being based on a relating additive<br />

matrix are wildly applicated (Boyce,<br />

1983; Olech, 2003). Key element in the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> endangered populations is<br />

rational selection with special consideration<br />

to the inbred monitoring. Mating<br />

animals within closed population can<br />

lead to inbreeding depression (Frankham,<br />

1997; Meagher et al., 2000; Sternicki et al.,<br />

2003). The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper was to estimate<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding coefficient<br />

and its changes in time for three leopard<br />

Panthera pardus captive populations.<br />

Those populations represent subspecies:<br />

Panthera pardus japonensis (569 specimens),<br />

Panthera pardus saxicolor (528<br />

specimens) and Panthera pardus orientalis<br />

(490 specimens). Those populations<br />

are the most numerous and all participated<br />

in European Endangered Species Programme<br />

(EEP). Fourth leopard’ subspecies<br />

participating in EEP Panthera pardus<br />

kotiya was excluded from analyses due<br />

to incomplete pedigree data, above 23%<br />

(Sternicki, 2006).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The material was pedigree data taken from<br />

the data ISIS base (International Species<br />

Information System) containing information<br />

about leopards born between year<br />

1915 and 2003 from 37 countries. Due<br />

to small number <strong>of</strong> observations per year<br />

and assumed changes <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

conditions in time as well as management<br />

methods, three years periods were distinguished.<br />

For all individual the inbreeding<br />

coefficient was calculated using method<br />

presented by Quass (1976). Specimens<br />

with unknown parents were treated as<br />

non-inbred.<br />

Information about the analyzed populations<br />

is shown in Table 1. The largest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> specimens with unknown<br />

parents was in the first years <strong>of</strong> breeding<br />

before 1968 (above 54%) and the lowest<br />

was in the period 1989<strong>–</strong>1991 (12.56 %)<br />

and 2001<strong>–</strong>2003 (10.84%).<br />

In analyzed population 158 individuals<br />

with unknown parent were recorded.<br />

The most completed data was for the<br />

saxicolor subspecies (97.54%). The<br />

incompleteness <strong>of</strong> the information about<br />

ancestors in all population is c.a. 10%.<br />

This way the obtained information was<br />

note as a table. Every record contained


The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in three subspecies <strong>of</strong> leopard... 207<br />

TABLE 1. Population size and number <strong>of</strong> specimens with incomplete pedigree data<br />

Subspecies<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> specimens<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> specimens with<br />

unknown ancestors<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> specimens with<br />

unknown ancestors<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

japonensis 569 83 14.59<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

orientalis 490 62 12.65<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

saxicolor 528 13 2.46<br />

the information about single specimen.<br />

<strong>Animal</strong>s were sorted according the birth<br />

data and numbered. The collected data<br />

about every animal included the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> each animal, its father and mother, the<br />

sex (1 <strong>–</strong> male, 2 <strong>–</strong> female, 3 <strong>–</strong> specimens<br />

with the unknown sex). After making the<br />

mentioned editions and renumbering, the<br />

inbreeding coefficient was calculated<br />

using additive matrix (Henderson, 1988;<br />

Quass, 1979). The additive matrix is a<br />

table <strong>of</strong> size n × n (where n is a number <strong>of</strong><br />

specimens) with possibility to calculate<br />

relation between all animals. Inbreeding<br />

coefficient is calculated on the basis<br />

diagonal elements (a ii ).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

In result a great differences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inbreeding level was found as well as<br />

in proportion <strong>of</strong> inbred to non-inbred<br />

animals within every subspecies, periods<br />

<strong>of</strong> the birth and the sex (Figures 1<strong>–</strong>2,<br />

Tables 2<strong>–</strong>3). In analyzed period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

an increasing number <strong>of</strong> specimens was<br />

observed. From the total 1584 specimens,<br />

347 have non-zero inbred rate (ca<br />

22%). Table 2 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

inbreeding coefficient within all populations.<br />

The most numerous group in Table 2<br />

(144 specimens) were animals with the<br />

TABLE 2. The distribution <strong>of</strong> inbreeding coefficient<br />

in all subspecies<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

coefficient<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> specimens<br />

0 1240<br />

0.001<strong>–</strong>0.022 15<br />

0.023<strong>–</strong>0.040 20<br />

0.041<strong>–</strong>0.061 32<br />

0.062<strong>–</strong>0.081 40<br />

0.082<strong>–</strong>0.102 36<br />

0.103<strong>–</strong>0.240 39<br />

0.241<strong>–</strong>0.265 144<br />

0.266<strong>–</strong>0.375 21<br />

inbred value around 0.25. The highest<br />

level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding was 0.375 and in last<br />

group only 21 specimens were found.<br />

Almost half <strong>of</strong> inbred animals have<br />

coefficient below 10%. On Figure 1 the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> inbred and non-inbred animals<br />

in analyses periods is presented. On the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> leopard breeding in zoological<br />

gardens an increasing number <strong>of</strong><br />

inbred specimens is noticed. It was caused<br />

(among others) with low level <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

exchange between zoological gardens,<br />

and in consequence the mating between<br />

related animals. Moreover it is correlating<br />

with more complete pedigree data.<br />

In the last periods a decrease <strong>of</strong> population<br />

size as well as number <strong>of</strong> inbred<br />

specimen were observed. The largest


208 T. Sternicki et al.<br />

180<br />

160<br />

number <strong>of</strong> specimens<br />

number <strong>of</strong> inbreed specimens<br />

140<br />

number <strong>of</strong> specimens<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />


The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in three subspecies <strong>of</strong> leopard... 209<br />

0,3<br />

0,25<br />

all population<br />

only inbreed animals<br />

inbreed coefficient<br />

0,2<br />

0,15<br />

0,1<br />

0,05<br />

0<br />

natal periods<br />

FIGURE 2. The average inbreeding level in years for analyzed population <strong>of</strong> the leopard<br />

TABLE 3. The size <strong>of</strong> the leopard’s population and the level <strong>of</strong> inbred divided into sex groups<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> specimens<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> inbred<br />

specimens<br />

Inbred level<br />

Sex N N F N F [%]<br />

Male 705 130 18.44<br />

Female 733 190 25.92<br />

Unknown 149 27 18.12<br />

F N<br />

(sd)<br />

0.0283<br />

(0.0759)<br />

0.0442<br />

(0.0896)<br />

0.0311<br />

(0.0799)<br />

F F<br />

(sd)<br />

0.1537<br />

(0.1096)<br />

0.1704<br />

(0.0973)<br />

0.1714<br />

(0.1059)<br />

Explanations: N <strong>–</strong> number <strong>of</strong> all specimens. N F <strong>–</strong> number <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens. N F <strong>–</strong> percent <strong>of</strong> inbred<br />

specimens. F N <strong>–</strong> average inbred rate <strong>of</strong> all individuals. F F <strong>–</strong> average inbred rate <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens.<br />

on the level 0.043. This is probably result<br />

<strong>of</strong> well choice <strong>of</strong> pairs for breeding. In<br />

Table 3 there are presented detailed information<br />

about inbred level and number<br />

<strong>of</strong> animals divided into sexes. It is possible<br />

to notice that larger part <strong>of</strong> females<br />

(25.92%) than males (18.44) is inbred as<br />

well there is greater inbreeding level for<br />

females. The average inbreeding coefficient<br />

for all females equals to 0.0442 than<br />

for males is almost two times smaller<br />

0.0283. The same relation is for inbred<br />

animals (17.04% females and 15.37%<br />

males).<br />

In summary average inbred level<br />

within the leopard’s population was equal<br />

to 3.6% however mean value for inbred<br />

animals was high on the level 18.6%. On


210 T. Sternicki et al.<br />

Figure 3 the number <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens<br />

and total number <strong>of</strong> animals belonging to<br />

each subspecies were presented.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens<br />

within subspecies was equal to: 13.1%<br />

(japonensis), 24.7% (orientalis) and<br />

28.6% (saxicolor). It is important to point<br />

that almost complete information about<br />

ancestors in this last group undoubtedly<br />

influenced for getting more accurate<br />

estimating the inbreed coefficient. The<br />

mean inbred values for each subspecies<br />

are presented in Table 4. For saxicolor<br />

subspecies the average inbred level was<br />

the highest and the percentage <strong>of</strong> inbred<br />

specimens was also the highest (28.6%)<br />

and the lowest incompleteness <strong>of</strong> pedigree<br />

(2.46%). Number <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens<br />

in this population is the highest<br />

compared with other subspecies. In this<br />

group the average inbred level was estimated<br />

as 0.05.<br />

The lowest inbred rate for inbred<br />

animals was found for the orientalis<br />

subspecies (0.11) and saxicolor (0.178).<br />

It could be pointed that low level was<br />

caused trough optimal choices <strong>of</strong> animals<br />

for matings. Population <strong>of</strong> orientalis<br />

leopard kept in zoological gardens is<br />

considerably larger than the wild living<br />

herds estimated on the level <strong>of</strong> only<br />

several dozen <strong>of</strong> specimens.<br />

The increase <strong>of</strong> inbreeding within<br />

free living population might be caused<br />

number <strong>of</strong> speciments<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

number <strong>of</strong> all specimens<br />

number <strong>of</strong> inbreed specimens<br />

0<br />

japonensis orientalis saxicolor<br />

leopard's subspecies<br />

FIGURE 3. The number <strong>of</strong> inbred individuals in analyzed leopard’s subspecies<br />

TABLE 4. The level <strong>of</strong> inbred in analyzed leopard’s subspecies<br />

Subspecies N F [%]<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

japonensis<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

orientalis<br />

Panthera pardus<br />

saxicolor<br />

13.10<br />

24.69<br />

28.60<br />

F N<br />

(sd)<br />

0.029<br />

(0.080)<br />

0.027<br />

(0.064)<br />

0.050<br />

(0.099)<br />

F F<br />

(sd)<br />

0.228<br />

(0.062)<br />

0.111<br />

(0.086)<br />

0.176<br />

(0.109)<br />

N X [%]<br />

14.59<br />

12.65<br />

Explanations: N F <strong>–</strong> percent <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens, F N <strong>–</strong> average inbred rate <strong>of</strong> all individuals, F F <strong>–</strong> average<br />

inbred rate <strong>of</strong> inbred specimens, N X <strong>–</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> incomplete pedigree<br />

2.46


The level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding in three subspecies <strong>of</strong> leopard... 211<br />

by natural barriers making free migrations<br />

impossible. Such studies about this<br />

relation were done by De Boere’ (1995)<br />

and Elridge’ et al. (1999) who found the<br />

high level <strong>of</strong> inbreeding among lizards<br />

living on separate islands or among elephant<br />

seals on chosen habitats. as well<br />

as kangaroos living in separated populations.<br />

The is lack <strong>of</strong> scientific information<br />

about the level <strong>of</strong> inbred in free<br />

living leopard population. But. it is<br />

obvious that in some isolated reserves high<br />

inbred level could be found (Miththapala<br />

et al., 1996). According to those authors<br />

among the leopard population living in<br />

Kosrov reserve the high inbreeding was<br />

noted and is increasing about 3% for<br />

every next generation.<br />

Generally results achieved at this work<br />

are corresponding with studies concerning<br />

other species held in zoological gardens.<br />

For the population <strong>of</strong> the Arabic<br />

oryx Oryx leucoryx average inbreed<br />

level was equal to 0.042. however for<br />

the Milu deer Elaphurus davidianus<br />

this coefficient is smaller (0.024<strong>–</strong>0.025)<br />

(Szablewski, 2003; Sternicki, 2002).<br />

Decrease <strong>of</strong> this coefficient was also<br />

recorded in these populations in time. It<br />

might be explained with implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> breeding programs.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BOYCE A.J., 1983: Computation <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

and kinship coefficients on extended pedigrees.<br />

Heredity 74: 400<strong>–</strong>404.<br />

DE BOER L.E.M., 1995: Genetics and breeding<br />

programmes. EEP Coordinators manual. Amsterdam.<br />

ELRIDGE M.D.B., KING J.M., LOUPIS A.K.,<br />

SPENCER P.B.S., TAYLOR A.C., HALL G.P.,<br />

1999: Unprecedented low levels <strong>of</strong> genetic variation<br />

and inbreeding depression in an island<br />

population <strong>of</strong> black-footed rock-wallaby. Conserv.<br />

Biol. 13: 531<strong>–</strong>541.<br />

FRAKHAM R., 1997: Do island populations have<br />

less genetic variation than mainland populations?<br />

Heredity 78: 311<strong>–</strong>327.<br />

GIBSON J.P., VAN ARENDONK J.A.M., 1998:<br />

Introduction to the design and economics <strong>of</strong><br />

animal breeding strategies. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Agr. Univ.<br />

August 10<strong>–</strong>21. Warszawa. Lecture notes.<br />

HEDRICK P.W., 1987: Estimation <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

partial inbreeding. Heredity 58: 161<strong>–</strong>166.<br />

HENDERSON C.R., 1988: Theoretical basis and<br />

computational methods for a number <strong>of</strong> different<br />

animal models. J. Dairy Sci. 71: 1<strong>–</strong>16.<br />

KELLER L.F., JEFFERY K.J., ARCESE P.,<br />

BEAUMONT M.A., HOCHACHKA W.M.,<br />

SMITH J.N., BRUFORD M.W., 2001: Immigration<br />

and the ephemerality <strong>of</strong> a natural population<br />

bottleneck: evidence from molecular<br />

markers. Proc. Royal Soc. London B. Biol. Sci.<br />

268: 1387<strong>–</strong>1394.<br />

LAIKRE L., ANDREN R., LARSSON H.O.,<br />

RYMAN N., 1996: Inbreeding depression in<br />

brown bear (Ursus arctos). Biol. Conserv. 76:<br />

69<strong>–</strong>72.<br />

LAIKRE L., 1999: Conservation genetics <strong>of</strong><br />

Nordic carnivores: lessons from zoos. Heredity<br />

130: 203<strong>–</strong>216.<br />

LEROY G., ROGNON X., VARLET A., JOFFRIN<br />

C., VERRIER E., 2005: Genetic variability in<br />

French dog breeds assessed by pedigree data.<br />

J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123: 1<strong>–</strong>9.<br />

MEAGHER S., PENN D.J., POTTS W.K., 2000:<br />

Male<strong>–</strong>male competition magnifies inbreeding<br />

depression in wild house mice. Proc. Nat.<br />

Acad. Sci. USA 97: 3324<strong>–</strong>3329.<br />

MITHTHAPALA S., SEIDENSTICKER J.,<br />

O’BRIEN S.J., 1996: Phylogeographic subspecies<br />

recognition in leopards (Panthera pardus):<br />

molecular genetic variation. Conserv. Biol. 10:<br />

1115<strong>–</strong>1132.<br />

NOWICKI B., 1985: Genetyka i metody doskonalenia<br />

zwierząt. PWRiL. Warszawa.<br />

OLECH W., 2003: Wpływ inbredu osobniczego<br />

i inbredu matki na przeżywalność cieląt żubra<br />

(Bison bonasus). Rozprawy naukowe i monografie.<br />

Wyd. <strong>SGGW</strong>. Warszawa.<br />

QUAAS R.L., 1976: Computing the diagonal<br />

elements and inverse <strong>of</strong> a large numerator relationship<br />

matrix. Biometrics 32: 949<strong>–</strong>953.


212 T. Sternicki et al.<br />

SHOEMAKER A.H., 1981: International leopard<br />

studbook. Columbia. South Carolina. Riverbanks<br />

Park.<br />

SHOEMAKER A.H., 1983: Population dynamic<br />

<strong>of</strong> pedigree leopards, panther pardus ssp. in<br />

captivity. Zoo Biology 2: 79<strong>–</strong>91.<br />

STERNICKI T., 2002: Poziom zinbredowania<br />

a długość życia jelenia milu (Elaphurus davidianus;<br />

Milne Edwards 1866). Praca magisterska.<br />

Bibl. Gł. AR. Poznań.<br />

STERNICKI T., SZABLEWSKI P., SZWACZ-<br />

KOWSKI T., 2003: Inbreeding effects on lifetime<br />

in David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus.<br />

Milne Edwards 1866) population. J. Appl.<br />

Genet. 44: 175<strong>–</strong>183.<br />

STERNICKI T., 2006: Uwarunkowania genetyczne<br />

i pozagenetyczne długości życia lamparta<br />

(Pantera pardus) i pantery śnieżnej (Uncia<br />

uncia). Rozprawa doktorska. Bibl. Gł. AR.<br />

Poznań.<br />

SZABLEWSKI P., 2003: Zmienność genetyczna<br />

w populacjach wybranych gatunków zwierząt<br />

utrzymywanych w ogrodach zoologicznych.<br />

Rozprawa doktorska. Bibl. Gł. AR. Poznań.<br />

WRIGHT S., 1922: Coefficients <strong>of</strong> inbreeding<br />

and relationship. Amer. Nat. 56: 330<strong>–</strong>338.<br />

WRIGHT S., 1931: Evolution in Mendelian<br />

populations. Genetics 16: 97<strong>–</strong>159.<br />

ZHU J., NESTOR K.E., MORITSU Y., 1996:<br />

Relationship between band sharing levels <strong>of</strong><br />

DNA fingerprints and inbreeding coefficients<br />

and estimation <strong>of</strong> true inbreeding in turkey<br />

lines. Poult. Sci. 75: 25<strong>–</strong>28.<br />

Streszczenie: Poziom inbredu u trzech podgatunków<br />

lamparta (Panthera pardus). Szacowanie<br />

poziomu inbredu jest bardzo ważną częścią hodowli<br />

populacji zwierząt utrzymywanych w niewoli.<br />

Wzrastający współczynnik inbredu objawia<br />

się jako depresja inbredowa. Jest odpowiedzialna<br />

za redukcję cech związanych z rozrodem i odpornością.<br />

Celem tych badań było oszacowanie<br />

poziomu inbredu i jego zmian w czasie wśród<br />

trzech podgatunków lamparta objętych programem<br />

EEP (Panthera pardus japonensis, Panthera<br />

pardus saxicolor, Panthera pardus orientalis).<br />

Materiał stanowiły dane rodowodowe dotyczące<br />

osobników urodzonych w latach 1915<strong>–</strong>2003, skatalogowane<br />

w bazie ISIS. Współczynnik inbredu<br />

oszacowano na podstawie macierzy spokrewnień<br />

addytywnych. W pierwszych analizowanych latach<br />

(do 1979 roku) średni współczynnik inbredu<br />

osiągał wysoką wartość 0,25. Osobniki urodzone<br />

w latach 2001<strong>–</strong>2003 charakteryzowały się znacznie<br />

niższą wartością parametru 0.043. Procent<br />

zwierząt zinbredowanych w obrębie każdego<br />

podgatunku wynosił 13,1% (japonensis), 24.7%<br />

(orientalis) and 28,6% (saxicolor).<br />

MS. received September 1, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Tomasz Sternicki, Tomasz Szwaczkowski<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Podstaw Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

Wydział Biologii i Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu<br />

ul. Wołyńska 33, 60-635 Poznań<br />

Poland<br />

tuo@wp.pl<br />

Katarzyna Góral, Wanda Olech<br />

Katedra Genetyki i Ogólnej Hodowli Zwierząt<br />

Wydział Nauk o Zwierzętach <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland


<strong>Annals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

<strong>Animal</strong> Science No 47, 2010: 213<strong>–</strong>219<br />

(Ann. <strong>Warsaw</strong> Univ. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Sci. <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong>, Anim. Sci. 47, 2010)<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen and nitrogen concentrations<br />

on the speed <strong>of</strong> waking up after CO 2 anesthesia and on the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> starting egg-laying by the artificially inseminated queen bees<br />

IZABELA WOJCIECHOWSKA 1 , ZYGMUNT JASIŃSKI 2 , IRENA KUBICA 3<br />

1<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Animal</strong>s Environment, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong><br />

<strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

2<br />

Bee Division, <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

3<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Technology and <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> in Bydgoszcz<br />

Abstract: The infl uence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen and<br />

nitrogen concentrations on the speed <strong>of</strong> waking<br />

up after CO 2 anesthesia and on the time <strong>of</strong> starting<br />

egg-laying by the artifi cially inseminated<br />

queen bees. This work was carried out in the Bee<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Science in<br />

the 2006 bee season. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this research<br />

was to find factor that speeds up egg-laying by the<br />

artificially inseminated queen bees (Apis mellifera<br />

carnica L). In the research 82 queen bees were<br />

used which were inseminated with a single semen<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 8 mm 3 . All queen bees were anaesthetized<br />

with CO 2 . Three groups where considered: 1) control<br />

<strong>–</strong> bees were waken up in the atmosphere, 2)<br />

<strong>–</strong> bees were waken up in the air which contained<br />

15% O 2 and 85% N 2 , 3) <strong>–</strong> bees were waken up<br />

from anesthesia in the air with 35% O 2 and 65%<br />

N 2 . Change <strong>of</strong> the O 2 content in air, which was<br />

used for waking up queen bees from anesthesia,<br />

caused faster waking up (on average about 8 minutes).<br />

However, the change <strong>of</strong> O 2 content in air<br />

didn’t cause significant changes in the time <strong>of</strong><br />

egg-laying in comparison to control group.<br />

Key words: queen bee, insemination, egg-laying,<br />

oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

People have long been trying to influence<br />

the parents’ selection in bees. First tests<br />

<strong>of</strong> queen bees and the drones matching<br />

were undertaken in XVIII century.<br />

In USA Watson (1927) executed first<br />

successful test insemination with a help<br />

<strong>of</strong> syringe stocked in glass needle, to<br />

which he took semen from a drone.<br />

From this first successful test <strong>of</strong> the bee<br />

artificial insemination began an effective<br />

period <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> queen bees<br />

artificial insemination. <strong>Animal</strong>s’ artificial<br />

insemination contributed to obtainment<br />

in farming considerable progress. It is the<br />

only road <strong>of</strong> individual selection <strong>of</strong> paternal<br />

side and <strong>of</strong> the mother side in bees.<br />

We can obtain bees thoroughbred, create<br />

breeding lines and strengthen bees pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

features.<br />

The artificial insemination manipulation<br />

is not perfect. The late beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

lying eggs by queens is a main defect <strong>of</strong><br />

insemination in comparison to mothers<br />

naturally inseminated, which egg-laying<br />

begin in only several days after mating<br />

flight. Latencies periods at queens artificially<br />

inseminated are different and it<br />

can last from several to tens days. Extension<br />

<strong>of</strong> expected time <strong>of</strong> beginning lying


214 I. Wojciechowska, Z. Jasiński, I. Kubica<br />

eggs by inseminated queens is the cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> weakening the families and reduces<br />

their productivity. Queens inseminated<br />

are exchanged more <strong>of</strong>ten than mother<br />

naturally inseminated, which is the cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> large economic losses.<br />

For many years it has been searched<br />

effective method, which could help<br />

inseminated queens to undertake oviposition<br />

more quickly. According to Mackensen<br />

(1947) double queens anaesthetization<br />

with dioxide <strong>of</strong> carbon <strong>–</strong> 2 times for 10<br />

minutes each <strong>–</strong> precipitated oviposition.<br />

However after few years it turned out,<br />

that this intervention shortened their life.<br />

Jasiński et al. (2005) showed, that<br />

forcing queens to flight directly before<br />

intervention <strong>of</strong> artificial insemination<br />

accelerates lying eggs, but only for few<br />

days.<br />

Poland brought in investigation on<br />

artificial insemination improvement huge<br />

contribution. The biggest achievements<br />

in this field belong to investigations conducted<br />

in the Bee Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Science, and also in<br />

Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Pomology and<br />

Floriculture in Puławy.<br />

Investigation over accelerating factors<br />

undertaking egg-laying by artificially<br />

inseminated queens are still led.<br />

The examining influence <strong>of</strong> different<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> oxygen and nitrogen<br />

was the aim <strong>of</strong> investigations <strong>of</strong> present<br />

work on speed waking up bee queens<br />

after anaesthetization CO2 as well as<br />

on time <strong>of</strong> undertaking laying eggs by<br />

inseminated queens.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

This experiment was conducted on the<br />

honey bee (Apis mellifera carnica L.) in<br />

the Bee Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Science, in the 2006 bee season.<br />

Material:<br />

• 82 Carniolan queen bees which were<br />

sisters,<br />

• worker bees,<br />

• the semen <strong>of</strong> the drones <strong>of</strong> a different<br />

origin.<br />

The hives mating with three skewers<br />

were used. Two <strong>of</strong> the skewers were<br />

combined with foundation, one had<br />

comb drawn-out. Every hive mating was<br />

settled by workers bees (approx. 1000).<br />

Worker bees were derived from outside<br />

the Bee Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Science’s apiary. 1/3 volume <strong>of</strong><br />

hive mating was chamber filled with<br />

candy honey-sugar. The queen cells had<br />

15 days when they were introduced, so<br />

before queen bees’ emergence. In order to<br />

prevent queen bees from natural insemination,<br />

the queen excluders were inserted<br />

in entrances <strong>of</strong> the hives mating. After<br />

settlement, the mating hives were placed<br />

in a basement <strong>–</strong> a special building, which<br />

was partly situated in the ground, purposed<br />

to wintering <strong>of</strong> bees. There was<br />

dark and temperature was 4<strong>–</strong>8ºC. The<br />

building was situated in the area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bee Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> apiary. After 3 days the<br />

mating hives were removed from the<br />

basement, placed in apiary and sponge<br />

was removed in order to allow queen<br />

bees to fly. The mating hives were placed<br />

in hives which were situated on the<br />

stone slab in order to isolate them from<br />

the ground. Bees were fed with candy<br />

honey-sugar once per 2<strong>–</strong>3 days. Candy<br />

honey-sugar consisted <strong>of</strong> caster sugar<br />

and warmed honey in proportion 5:1.<br />

The artificial insemination was conducted<br />

a week after queen bees’ emergence in


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen and nitrogen concentrations... 215<br />

queen cells. Semen from the drones was<br />

derived from outside the Bee Division<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Warsaw</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong>.<br />

The artificial insemination was conducted<br />

with using <strong>of</strong> apparatus constructed<br />

by Zygmunt Jasiński. The semen was<br />

collected into a needle <strong>of</strong> a syringe. The<br />

single dose was 8 mm 3 <strong>of</strong> semen. The<br />

queen bees were placed into a transparent<br />

plastic pipe which was fixed to rack<br />

<strong>of</strong> apparatus. They were anaesthetized<br />

by CO 2 for 3<strong>–</strong>5 minutes. After the artificial<br />

insemination, anaesthetized queen<br />

bees were marked with fast-drying white<br />

paint on a dorsal side <strong>of</strong> a thorax.<br />

Afterwards queen bees were placed in<br />

a gas chamber which consisted <strong>of</strong> a jar<br />

with tight lid. Gases from the bottles<br />

were delivered through the small holes in<br />

a lid. In one bottle was oxygen, in other<br />

nitrogen. After starting a bottle, specific<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> oxygen and nitrogen<br />

was adjusted by a reducer: 15% O 2 : 85%<br />

N 2 and 35% O 2 : 65% N 2 . Gases were<br />

mixed in specified proportions.<br />

After filling up a chamber, the flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gases was closed. An anaesthetized<br />

queen bee was laying until waking<br />

up from CO 2 anesthesia (to the moment<br />

when the queen bee made a first step).<br />

After waking up from CO 2 anesthesia,<br />

queen bees were placed in Zender’s<br />

cages and moved to a thin layer <strong>of</strong> candy<br />

honey-sugar in hives mating which was<br />

quickly eaten by worker bees and the<br />

queen bee was released from a cage.<br />

The next stage <strong>of</strong> this experiment was:<br />

everyday controlling and noting down<br />

time <strong>of</strong> starting <strong>of</strong> egg-laying and replenishing<br />

food in the hives mating. Bees<br />

in the mating hives were fed 3<strong>–</strong>4 times<br />

per week.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In order to investigate the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

different concentration <strong>of</strong> oxygen and<br />

nitrogen during waking up after CO 2<br />

anesthesia, 3 groups <strong>of</strong> inseminated queen<br />

bees were established:<br />

1) control group <strong>–</strong> queen bees which<br />

were waking up from CO 2 anesthesia<br />

in the atmospheric air;<br />

2) queen bees which were waking up<br />

from CO 2 anesthesia in the air which<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> 15% O 2 and 85% N 2 ;<br />

3) queen bees which were waking up<br />

from CO 2 anesthesia in the air which<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> 35% O 2 and 65% N 2 .<br />

In the experiment examined:<br />

• time <strong>of</strong> waking up <strong>of</strong> queen bees from<br />

CO 2 anesthesia after the artificial insemination<br />

(Tab. 1);<br />

• number <strong>of</strong> days between the artificial<br />

insemination and egg-lying (Tab. 2).<br />

It was showed, that in queen bees from<br />

the control group waking up from CO 2<br />

anesthesia was in compartment <strong>of</strong> time<br />

from 7 to 17 minutes.<br />

It was also affirmed, that queen bees<br />

waking up in the air with 15% O 2 and<br />

85% <strong>of</strong> N 2 were waking up in time from<br />

2 to 20 minutes, however queen bees<br />

from the group in the air containing 35%<br />

O 2 and 65% N 2 were waking up in compartment<br />

from 1 to 6 minutes (Fig. 1).<br />

The change <strong>of</strong> content O 2 in the air gases<br />

mixture applied to waking up queen bees<br />

from anaesthetization with CO 2 , accelerated<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> waking up in comparison<br />

to queen bees from control group<br />

(Fig. 1).<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> inseminated queen bees<br />

had begun the oviposition from 2 to 31<br />

days after artificial insemination. It concerns<br />

queen bees both from control group


216 I. Wojciechowska, Z. Jasiński, I. Kubica<br />

TABLE 1. Time <strong>of</strong> waking up and number <strong>of</strong><br />

queens after the queen bees anesthesia with CO 2<br />

Group<br />

Minutes<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> queens<br />

Control 7 2<br />

8 3<br />

11 1<br />

12 3<br />

13 5<br />

14 6<br />

15 5<br />

16 1<br />

17 1<br />

15% O 2 : 85% N 2 2 1<br />

2.5 1<br />

3 4<br />

4 9<br />

4.5 1<br />

5 8<br />

6 5<br />

8 1<br />

10 1<br />

20 1<br />

35% O 2 :65% N 2 1 1<br />

3 6<br />

4 6<br />

5 8<br />

6 1<br />

and queen bees waking up in artificial<br />

atmosphere as well, because the different<br />

proportions <strong>of</strong> oxygen is applied<br />

(Fig. 2).<br />

It was affirmed, that the oviposition in<br />

the control group took place on average<br />

after 11 days from the artificial insemination.<br />

It was showed, that queen waking up<br />

in air including 15% O 2 and 85% N 2 and<br />

also queen bees in 35% O 2 and 65% N 2<br />

begun oviposition earlier, after about<br />

10 days from artificial insemination<br />

TABLE 2. Number <strong>of</strong> days from insemination to<br />

oviposition in queen bees<br />

Group<br />

Number Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> queen<br />

Control 3 2<br />

4 1<br />

5 1<br />

6 3<br />

7 1<br />

8 5<br />

9 2<br />

10 1<br />

11 1<br />

12 1<br />

13 2<br />

14 1<br />

17 3<br />

27 1<br />

28 1<br />

32 1<br />

15% O 2 : 85% N 2 3 1<br />

4 1<br />

5 4<br />

6 4<br />

7 5<br />

8 1<br />

9 3<br />

10 1<br />

11 1<br />

12 2<br />

14 1<br />

15 4<br />

18 1<br />

19 2<br />

21 1<br />

24 1<br />

35% O 2 :65% N 2 4 1<br />

5 6<br />

6 6<br />

7 8<br />

8 1<br />

13 2<br />

15 1<br />

20 3<br />

30 1


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen and nitrogen concentrations... 217<br />

Minutes<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> queens C+I+II<br />

FIGURE 1. Time <strong>of</strong> waking up after the queen anesthesia with CO 2<br />

Days<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> queens C+I+II<br />

FIGURE 2. Number <strong>of</strong> days from insemination to oviposition in queens awaken in different O 2 and N 2<br />

concentrations<br />

(Fig. 3). However statistical analysis did<br />

not confirm the essential influence <strong>of</strong> different<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> air on egg-laying<br />

by inseminated queen bees (Fig. 3).<br />

Data are means ±S.D. <strong>of</strong> three groups.<br />

For each groups and each kolumn, means<br />

with different letters are significantly<br />

different from one another (p < 0.05)<br />

as determined by variance analysis followed<br />

by F-Snedecor test (Tab. 3).<br />

Data are means ±S.D. <strong>of</strong> three groups.<br />

For each groups and each kolumn, means<br />

with different letters are not significantly<br />

different from one another (p < 0.05)<br />

as determined by variance analysis followed<br />

by F-Snedecor test (Tab. 4).


218 I. Wojciechowska, Z. Jasiński, I. Kubica<br />

FIGURE 3. Average number <strong>of</strong> days between insemination and egg-laying <strong>of</strong> queens waken up by<br />

different O 2 and N 2 concentrations<br />

TABLE 3. Time <strong>of</strong> waking up after the queen anesthesia with CO 2<br />

Group No <strong>of</strong> queens Min-max Arithmetic mean Modal Median Variance<br />

Control 27 7<strong>–</strong>17 12.7 8,12,13,14,15 13 ±2.8 7.8<br />

15% O 2 :85 N 2 33 2<strong>–</strong>22 5.2 3,4,5,6 5 ±3.1 9.6<br />

35% O 2 :65 N 2 22 1<strong>–</strong>6 4.0 3,4,5 4 ±1.1 1.3<br />

TABLE 4. Number <strong>of</strong> days from insemination to oviposition<br />

Group No <strong>of</strong> queens Min-max Arithmetic mean Modal Median Variance<br />

Control 27 3<strong>–</strong>32 11.4 6,8,17 9 ±7.5 56.3<br />

15% O 2 : 85 N 2 33 3<strong>–</strong>24 10.3 5,6,7,15 9 ±5.5 30.2<br />

35% O 2 : 65 N 2 22 4<strong>–</strong>30 10.1 5,6,7,20 7 ±6.8 46.8<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

1. The reduction to 15% <strong>of</strong> the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen in the air which was used to<br />

waking up queen bees from CO 2 anesthesia<br />

caused significantly quicker waking<br />

up in the artificially inseminated queen<br />

bees.<br />

2. The increase to 35% <strong>of</strong> the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen in the air which was use to<br />

waking up queen bees from CO 2 anesthesia<br />

caused significantly quicker waking<br />

up in the artificially inseminated queen<br />

bees.<br />

3. The reduction to 15% <strong>of</strong> the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen in the air which was used to<br />

waking up queen bees from CO 2 anesthesia<br />

did not cause significantly quicker<br />

egg-laying <strong>of</strong> the artificially inseminated<br />

queen bees.<br />

4. The increase to 35% <strong>of</strong> the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> oxygen in the air which was used to<br />

waking up queen bees from CO 2 anesthesia<br />

did not cause significantly quicker<br />

egg-laying <strong>of</strong> the artificially inseminated<br />

queen bees.<br />

5. The change <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> oxygen<br />

in the air which was used to waking up<br />

queen bees from CO 2 anesthesia, caused<br />

significantly quicker waking up in the<br />

artificially inseminated queen bees.<br />

However, it did not cause significantly


The infl uence <strong>of</strong> different oxygen and nitrogen concentrations... 219<br />

quicker egg-laying <strong>of</strong> the artificially<br />

inseminated queen bees.<br />

REFEENCES<br />

MACKENSEN O., 1947: Effect <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide<br />

on initial oviposition <strong>of</strong> artificially inseminated<br />

and virgin Queen bees. J. Econ. Ent.<br />

40, 3, 344<strong>–</strong>349.<br />

JASIŃSKI Z., PRABUCKI J., WILDE J., WOYKE<br />

J., CHUDA-MICKIEWICZ B., SIUDA M.,<br />

MADRAS B., SAMBORSKI J., BRATKOW-<br />

SKI J., JOJCZYK A., BĄK B., 2005: Badania<br />

nad czynnikami przyspieszającymi czerwienie<br />

sztucznie unasienionych matek pszczelich.<br />

Materiały z XLII Nauk. Konf. Pszczel., Puławy,<br />

28<strong>–</strong>29.<br />

WATSON L.R., 1927: Controlled mating <strong>of</strong> queen<br />

bees. Hamilton.<br />

Streszczenie: Wpływ różnych stężeń tlenu i azotu<br />

na szybkość wybudzania się po narkozie CO 2 oraz<br />

na czas rozpoczynania czerwienia matek inseminowanych.<br />

Niniejszą pracę wykonano w Pracowni<br />

Hodowli Owadów Użytkowych Szkoły<br />

Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie,<br />

w sezonie pszczelarskim 2006 roku. Celem badań<br />

pracy było znalezienie czynnika przyspieszającego<br />

podejmowanie czerwienia przez sztucznie<br />

unasieniane matki pszczele (Apis mellifera carnica<br />

L.). W doświadczeniu wykorzystano 82 matki<br />

pszczele inseminowane jednokrotną 8 mm 3 dawką<br />

nasienia. Podczas inseminacji wszystkie matki<br />

były usypiane CO 2 . Stworzono 3 grupy: 1) kontrolna<br />

<strong>–</strong> wybudzana z narkozy CO 2 w powietrzu<br />

atmosferycznym, 2) wybudzana z narkozy CO 2<br />

w powietrzu zawierającym 15% O 2 i 85% N 2 ,<br />

3) wybudzana z narkozy CO 2 w powietrzu zawierającym<br />

35% O 2 i 65% N 2 . Zmiana zawartości O 2<br />

w powietrzu, które służyło do wybudzania matek<br />

z narkozy CO 2 , powodowało wysoko istotnie<br />

szybsze wybudzanie (średnio o 8 minut). Zmiana<br />

zawartości O 2 w powietrzu służącym do wybudzania<br />

matek z narkozy CO 2 nie spowodowała<br />

istotnego przyspieszenia czerwienia matek w porównaniu<br />

do grupy kontrolnej.<br />

MS. received October 14, 2010<br />

Authors’ address:<br />

Izabela Wojciechowska<br />

Katedra Biologii Środowiska Zwierząt<br />

Wydział Nauk o Zwierzętach <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Zygmunt Jasiński<br />

Pracownia Hodowli Owadów Użytkowych<br />

Wydział Nauk o Zwierzętach <strong>SGGW</strong><br />

ul. Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warszawa<br />

Poland<br />

Irena Kubica<br />

Katedra Zoologii<br />

Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt <strong>–</strong> UTP<br />

ul. Kordeckiego 20, 85-225 Bydgoszcz<br />

Poland

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!