Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov
Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov
Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.0 WATER QUALITY DATA<br />
3.1 Sources <strong>of</strong> Data<br />
<strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Water</strong>shed TMDL Final Report<br />
In order to assess the quality <strong>of</strong> the water in <strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> and to quantify the impairment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stream with respect to zinc and cadmium, several sources <strong>of</strong> data were considered. These data<br />
sources were collected by different <strong>gov</strong>ernment agencies and are summarized below and in<br />
Appendix A <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />
STORET<br />
STOrage and RETrieval (STORET) is a repository for water quality, biological, and physical<br />
data, and it is used by state environmental agencies, EPA and other Federal agencies,<br />
universities, private citizens, and many others. This data was collected by the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> over a twelve-year period between 1990 and 2002, and covers the reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>Silver</strong><br />
<strong>Creek</strong> from the Weber River at Wanship upstream to a station located near Bonanza Drive in<br />
Park City (see Figure 5). Not all <strong>of</strong> the sampling stations were sampled consistently throughout<br />
this period.<br />
USGS<br />
USGS conducted two separate studies on <strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>, one in 2000 and another in 2002. The<br />
USGS sampling locations cover the same reach <strong>of</strong> the stream as do the STORET stations.<br />
USEPA<br />
In the Year 2000, USEPA sampled during the Spring, Summer, and Autumn periods in the reach<br />
<strong>of</strong> the stream from the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Richardson Flats upstream to the headwaters <strong>of</strong> <strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>.<br />
3.2 Data Limitations<br />
As with most studies <strong>of</strong> this nature, there has not been continuous sampling conducted<br />
throughout the watershed over the 13 year time period analyzed. The sampling has included<br />
different time spans, non-uniform sampling within the time spans, and inconsistent flow<br />
measurements. Sometimes flow measurements were made concurrently with water quality<br />
sampling, and at other times no flow measurements were made. There do not appear to be any<br />
data points where only flow measurements were made.<br />
Figure 6 shows the sampling performed for dissolved zinc at the STORET locations. Only two<br />
sampling locations have data for the entire time span <strong>of</strong> the study. Most locations have data<br />
limited to shorter time periods.<br />
Generally there are small populations <strong>of</strong> data for most time periods. This necessitated the<br />
clustering <strong>of</strong> the individual data points. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the clustering was to be able to compute<br />
statistically reliable parameters for each time interval within the year. Because the standard error<br />
<strong>of</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> the mean value for populations is approximately proportional to the inverse <strong>of</strong> the<br />
square root <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> data points, it is important to have a minimum number <strong>of</strong> data<br />
points in order to reasonably estimate the mean value for the population. Therefore, the time<br />
interval for clustering was expanded until such time as the minimum number <strong>of</strong> data points per<br />
interval was in the range <strong>of</strong> 4 to 5. In order to accomplish this objective, it was necessary to<br />
Page 17