10.04.2014 Views

Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov

Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov

Silver Creek - Division of Water Quality - Utah.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Water</strong>shed TMDL Final Report<br />

Table 9 presents the coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation for flow, zinc concentration, and cadmium<br />

concentration at each <strong>of</strong> these key locations.<br />

Table 9: Coefficients <strong>of</strong> Variation<br />

Location<br />

Dissolved Dissolved<br />

Zinc Cadmium Flow<br />

Park City 77% 93% 182%<br />

Richardson 58% 108% 112%<br />

Ab. Atkinson 108% 125% 99%<br />

<strong>Silver</strong> Ck. WRF 50% n/a 39%<br />

Atkinson 80% 113% 95%<br />

Wanship 87% 152% 137%<br />

The coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation is determined as the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the population divided by<br />

its mean value. This is a measure <strong>of</strong> how tightly the data are clustered around the mean value.<br />

Lower numbers indicate that most <strong>of</strong> the data points are located close to the mean, while higher<br />

numbers indicated a wider spread <strong>of</strong> data points. The Above Atkinson and <strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> WRF<br />

sampling stations have the highest and lowest coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation, respectively, for zinc<br />

concentration. Thus, more confidence may be placed in the mean zinc value at the WRF than in<br />

the mean value at the Above Atkinson Station.<br />

The only Point Source in the watershed is the <strong>Silver</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Reclamation Facility. Average<br />

annual loads for this facility are also shown in Table 8. The average zinc concentration and<br />

average flow for the water reclamation facility are 0.14 mg/l and 2.2 cfs, respectively. These<br />

levels result in an estimated average loading <strong>of</strong> 1.7 pounds per day or 598 pounds per year.<br />

There are no recorded samples in the data where cadmium is above the detection limit. This<br />

results in a calculated cadmium load <strong>of</strong> zero pounds per year.<br />

Table 10 shows the incremental loading between each <strong>of</strong> the five key stations. Also shown are<br />

the estimated distances, in miles, between each <strong>of</strong> the key stations as well as the incremental<br />

loading rate in pounds per year per mile <strong>of</strong> stream.<br />

Table 10: Incremental Loading Results<br />

Incremental<br />

Cadmium Load<br />

Cadmium Load<br />

Rate (lb/mi)<br />

Incremental Zinc Load<br />

Location Dist. (mi)<br />

Zinc Load (lb) Rate (lb/mi)<br />

-<br />

(lb)<br />

Park City 2.6 2,000 770 18 6.9<br />

Richardson 3.42<br />

3,000 900 -8 -2.4<br />

Ab. Atkinson 4.1 5,000 1,200 16 3.9<br />

Atkinson 0.5 2,000 4,000 1 2.0<br />

Wanship 7.5 -4,000 -500 -15 -2.0<br />

Page 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!