22.04.2014 Views

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

These figures are from an extremely low base. Domestic economic investment is<br />

sorely needed to provide employment <strong>and</strong> provide much-needed infrastructure; this<br />

would reduce short-term unemployment <strong>and</strong> increase the long-run productivity of<br />

the Irish economy. The government has created a new investment fund – the Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) - using the NPRF’s €6.4bn discretionary investment<br />

portfolio. However, the fund is orientated towards commercial investment<br />

opportunities such as energy, broadb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water.<br />

The authors believe that there must be an off-balance sheet investment programme<br />

between <strong>2014</strong> <strong>and</strong> 2016 of €7bn, as we proposed in our briefing document, Investing<br />

for Growth, Jobs & Re<strong>cover</strong>y (Social Justice Irel<strong>and</strong>, 2013). This would directly create<br />

employment <strong>and</strong> also enhance growth, which would contribute to reducing the<br />

deficit by reducing unemployment <strong>and</strong> increasing tax returns. We propose that the<br />

investment programme target both economic <strong>and</strong> social infrastructure, including<br />

the construction of social housing units, investment in water infrastructure, <strong>and</strong><br />

investment in primary care facilities.<br />

ii) Towards a Just Taxation System<br />

The American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes once said that ‘taxes are the price we<br />

pay for a civilized society’. We have long argued that Irel<strong>and</strong>’s total tax-take is simply<br />

too low to pay for the services <strong>and</strong> social welfare provision that is necessary to ensure<br />

human dignity for all. We believe that the incidence of taxation falls too much on<br />

the shoulders of those on middle <strong>and</strong> low incomes. Therefore, the overall tax take<br />

must rise in such a way that the burden falls of those most able to bear it.<br />

a) Bring Taxes towards the European average<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>’s tax-take in 2010 was 28.2% of GDP, some 7.4% below the European average.<br />

The Department of Finance believes that the total tax-take as a % of GDP will rise to<br />

31.5% of GDP by 2016. Table 2.9 indicates the difference in the projected additional<br />

tax yield if Irel<strong>and</strong>’s tax burden moved closer to the European average than that<br />

indicated by the Department of Finance in the April 2013 Stability Programme<br />

Update. There has been some debate on the appropriate measures of Irel<strong>and</strong>’s fiscal<br />

capacity in recent years, given the difference between Irel<strong>and</strong>’s GNP <strong>and</strong> GDP. The<br />

Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) has suggested a hybrid measure in the form: [H<br />

= GNP+0.4 (GDP-GNP)] (IFAC, 2012: 53). Social Justice Irel<strong>and</strong> has argued that the<br />

tax-take should be increased to 34.9% of GDP, below the Eurostat threshold defining<br />

a low-tax country. An equivalent figure under the IFAC would be to increase taxes<br />

to a level that fluctuates around 39.5% of H.<br />

40 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!