22.04.2014 Views

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Individualising social welfare payments<br />

The issue of individualising payments so that all recipients receive their own social<br />

welfare payments has been on the policy agenda in Irel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> across the EU for<br />

several years. Social Justice Irel<strong>and</strong> welcomed the report of the Working Group,<br />

Examining the Treatment of Married, Cohabiting <strong>and</strong> One-Parent Families under the Tax<br />

<strong>and</strong> Social Welfare Codes, which addressed some of these individualisation issues.<br />

At present the welfare system provides a basic payment for a claimant, whether that<br />

be, for example, for a pension, a disability payment or a job-seeker’s payment. It then<br />

adds an additional payment of about two-thirds of the basic payment for the second<br />

person. For example, following Budget <strong>2014</strong>, a couple on the lowest social welfare<br />

rate receives a payment of €312.80 per week. This amount is approximately 1.66<br />

times the payment for a single person (€188). Were these two people living<br />

separately they would receive €188 each; giving a total of €376. Thus by living as a<br />

household unit such a couple receive a lower income than they would were they to<br />

live apart.<br />

Social Justice Irel<strong>and</strong> believes that this system is unfair <strong>and</strong> inequitable. We also<br />

believe that the system as currently structured is not compatible with the Equal<br />

Status Acts. People, more often than not, women, are disadvantaged by living as part<br />

of a household unit because they receive a lower income. We believe that where a<br />

couple is in receipt of welfare payments, the payment to the second person should<br />

be increased to equal that of the first. Such a change would remove the current<br />

inequity <strong>and</strong> bring the current social welfare system in line with the terms of the<br />

Equal Status Acts (2000-20<strong>04</strong>). An effective way of doing this would be to introduce<br />

a basic income system which is far more appropriate for the world of the 21st<br />

century.<br />

3.4 basic Income<br />

Over the past 12 years major progress has been achieved in building the case for the<br />

introduction of a basic income in Irel<strong>and</strong>. This includes the publication of a Green<br />

Paper on Basic Income by the Government in September 2002 <strong>and</strong> the publication of<br />

a book by Clark entitled The Basic Income Guarantee (2002). A major international<br />

conference on basic income was held in Dublin during Summer 2008 at which more<br />

than 70 papers from 30 countries were presented. These are available on Social Justice<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>’s website. More recently, Healy et al (2012) have provided an initial set of<br />

costing for a basic income <strong>and</strong> new European <strong>and</strong> Irish Basic Income networks have<br />

emerged. 29<br />

19<br />

These networks are the European Citizens’ Initiative for Unconditional Basic Income<br />

<strong>and</strong> Basic Income Irel<strong>and</strong>.<br />

76 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!