22.04.2014 Views

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

2014-04-22 - Socio Economic Review 2014 - Full text and cover - FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There are four key steps for such a debate to be worthwhile. It should:<br />

1. Set out a detailed analysis <strong>and</strong> critique of the present situation;<br />

2. Agree a vision for Irel<strong>and</strong>’s future – clarifying where Irel<strong>and</strong> should be in 10 to<br />

15 years’ time;<br />

3. Set out a comprehensive policy framework to address the challenges of moving<br />

towards this future; <strong>and</strong><br />

4. Identify a range of specific policy initiatives to be taken within this framework.<br />

Failure to promote <strong>and</strong> engage in such a debate has cost Irel<strong>and</strong> dearly in recent<br />

decades. By failing to address such questions Irel<strong>and</strong>, in recent years has, for<br />

example, allowed the single biggest transfer of resources from low <strong>and</strong> middle<br />

income people to the rich <strong>and</strong> powerful in its history <strong>and</strong> accepted the false<br />

justifications that enabled this to happen. The main beneficiaries of this transfer<br />

have been parts of the corporate sector especially the bondholders <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

institutions who took little or no ’hit’ for their gambling in Irel<strong>and</strong>’s private banking<br />

sector. Other large corporates also benefitted as their privileged tax position<br />

continues to be protected <strong>and</strong> they are not asked to make any contribution towards<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>’s rescue <strong>and</strong> ongoing re<strong>cover</strong>y <strong>and</strong> development.<br />

At the same time, poverty rose, unemployment reached record levels, emigration<br />

escalated dramatically, waiting lists for social housing rose, child poverty, long-term<br />

unemployment <strong>and</strong> the numbers of working poor people all became entrenched<br />

parts of Irel<strong>and</strong>’s reality. Public services were reduced significantly. Charges were<br />

introduced for many services while charges were increased in areas where they had<br />

previously existed. Funding for the community <strong>and</strong> voluntary sector was cut<br />

disproportionately at the very moment when the dem<strong>and</strong> for their services was<br />

increasing. The fact that the poorest 10% of the population had seen the biggest<br />

proportionate fall in their income was more or less ignored.<br />

Interestingly enough the situation across the EU is not much better. The European<br />

Commission’s Social Protection Report for 2013 (published March <strong>2014</strong>) shows the<br />

social situation worsening across the Union. It states:<br />

The latest figures on living <strong>and</strong> income conditions in the EU show that the EU<br />

is not making any progress towards achieving its Europe 2020 poverty <strong>and</strong> social<br />

exclusion target of lifting at least 20 million people from poverty <strong>and</strong> social<br />

exclusion by 2020. There are 6.7 million more people living in poverty or social<br />

exclusion since 2008, a total of 124.2 million people for the EU28 or close to 1<br />

in 4 Europeans in 2012. Poverty <strong>and</strong> social exclusion has increased in more than<br />

1/3 of the Member States in both 2011 <strong>and</strong> 2012. (European Commission Social<br />

Report, <strong>2014</strong>: 7)<br />

8 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!