04.05.2014 Views

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

slightly higher additional <strong>in</strong>come and slightly more employment than <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong><br />

male headed households.<br />

Table 5-4<br />

National macro economic impact<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g a R5000 <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> expenditure<br />

Female headed households<br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> annual household <strong>in</strong>come<br />

from between: R1 & R5000 R5,000 & R10,000 R10,000 & R20,000 R20,000 & R30,000 R30,000 & R40,000<br />

to between: R5,000 & R10,000 R10,000 & R20,000 R20,000 & R30,000 R30,000 & R40,000 R40,000 & R50,000<br />

Contribution to GDP 6,981 7,181 7,306 7,324 7,777<br />

Indirect contribution to household <strong>in</strong>come 3,257 3,540 3,645 3,717 4,168<br />

Indirect jobs created 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.25<br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come tax 605 656 676 695 799<br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> company taxes 306 315 335 344 366<br />

Increased <strong>in</strong> imports 1,276 1,359 1,339 1,393 1,391<br />

Table 5-5<br />

National macro economic impact<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g a R5000 <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> expenditure<br />

Male headed households<br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> annual household <strong>in</strong>come<br />

from between: R1 & R5000 R5,000 & R10,000 R10,000 & R20,000 R20,000 & R30,000 R30,000 & R40,000<br />

to between: R5,000 & R10,000 R10,000 & R20,000 R20,000 & R30,000 R30,000 & R40,000 R40,000 & R50,000<br />

Contribution to GDP 6,989 7,059 7,324 7,381 7,354<br />

Indirect contribution to household <strong>in</strong>come 3,273 3,380 3,682 3,743 3,713<br />

Indirect jobs created 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24<br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come tax 605 624 691 710 7<strong>14</strong><br />

Increases <strong>in</strong> company taxes 307 319 344 349 370<br />

Increased <strong>in</strong> imports 1,284 1,321 1,359 1,362 1,359<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>cial differences<br />

5.31 In calculat<strong>in</strong>g and present<strong>in</strong>g any differences that might occur to our macro<br />

economic variables as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expenditure we<br />

were <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> how each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come categories compared to <strong>the</strong> national<br />

average. <strong>The</strong>se are presented <strong>in</strong> Tables 5.6 to 5.11.<br />

5.32 It will be immediately evident that <strong>the</strong>re are few prov<strong>in</strong>cial differences <strong>in</strong><br />

expenditure patterns between households <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>in</strong>come category. As<br />

before <strong>the</strong> most important differences are primarily between different <strong>in</strong>come<br />

categories and, to a much lesser extent, between male and female headed<br />

households.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!