04.05.2014 Views

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SETP No. 14 The Economic Value of Incremental Employment in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 ton mach<strong>in</strong>es. <strong>The</strong> latter wheeled loader is normally used for m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

operations and not for road construction. Buckets sizes vary from 1.4 m 3 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10<br />

ton range to 2.1 m 3 . (Bucket size is important for project<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relative cost <strong>of</strong><br />

labour and equipment-based construction).<br />

6.8 Prices for 10 ton wheeled loaders range between R550,000 for <strong>the</strong> Caterpillar<br />

9<strong>14</strong> to R716,000 for <strong>the</strong> Komatsu WA 250. <strong>The</strong> equivalent Bell (1204) retails at<br />

R619,306. <strong>The</strong> 13 ton mach<strong>in</strong>es cost between R731,000 for <strong>the</strong> Bell 1706 and<br />

R873,000 for <strong>the</strong> Komatsu WA 320. Very large wheeled loaders cost well over a<br />

million rand each. Bucket size appears to be important <strong>in</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>No</strong>te how after<br />

adjust<strong>in</strong>g for bucket size <strong>the</strong>re is less price variation – <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al column <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

32 calculates <strong>the</strong> cost per m 3 <strong>of</strong> bucket. Here <strong>the</strong> Bell wheeled loaders are <strong>the</strong><br />

most price competitive followed by <strong>the</strong> Komatsu range. Caterpillar trails a distant<br />

third.<br />

Table 6-1<br />

Mach<strong>in</strong>e type: Cost <strong>of</strong> new mach<strong>in</strong>e (Rm) Tonnage Bucket size M 3 Cost per M 3 <strong>of</strong> bucket (Rm)<br />

Komatsu WA 250 0.72 10.5 2.1 0.34<br />

Komatsu WA 320 0.87 13.7 2.4 0.36<br />

Komatsu WA 470 1.43 22.7 4.1 0.35<br />

Caterpillar 9<strong>14</strong> 0.55 10 1.4 0.39<br />

Caterpillar 988 3.00 22 5 0.60<br />

Bell 1204 0.62 10 1.9 0.33<br />

Bell 1706 0.73 13 2.4 0.30<br />

Bell 2208 1.17 22 3.5 0.33<br />

Source: Manufacturers representatives<br />

6.9 Table 6.2 provides an estimated capital cost breakdown for a typical wheeled<br />

loader <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 ton to 13 ton range. This was sourced from discussions with<br />

managers <strong>in</strong> strip m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong> South Africa and Namibia. Hence it is<br />

expected that chassis and frame make up 9% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total cost <strong>of</strong> a wheeled<br />

loader, <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>e 15%, transmission 25%, and so on.<br />

Table 6-2<br />

Capital Cost Breakdown Estimate<br />

Component<br />

Contribution to Capital Cost<br />

Tyres 10%<br />

Chassis and Frame 9%<br />

Bucket & Implements 5%<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>e 15%<br />

Hydraulic Controls 12%<br />

Transmission 25%<br />

Drive Tra<strong>in</strong> 21%<br />

Electrical 3%<br />

6.10 <strong>The</strong> components listed <strong>in</strong> Table 6.2 were classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> fourth edition<br />

standard <strong>in</strong>dustry classification (SIC) codes us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es set out <strong>in</strong><br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!