18.05.2014 Views

THE ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - PEI Media

THE ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - PEI Media

THE ANNUAL REVIEW 2010 - PEI Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

private equity annual review <strong>2010</strong> pa g e 111<br />

c h i n a<br />

Banner year<br />

As fundraising in RMB continued to dominate in China in <strong>2010</strong>, the country’s offshore<br />

LPs have been feeling increasingly marginalised, finds Hsiang-Ching Tseng<br />

One of the key statistics to come out of<br />

China in 2009 was the fact that at $8.73<br />

billion, fundraising for RMB-denominated<br />

China-focused private equity funds overtook<br />

funds raised in USD ($4.27 billion) for the<br />

first time, according to China-focused private<br />

equity research body Zero2IPO.<br />

Despite a recovery in Western LPs’<br />

appetite for private equity commitments<br />

(especially to China), the trend looks to<br />

have continued into <strong>2010</strong>. In fact, the ranks<br />

of Chinese LPs are set to be swelled even<br />

further going forward since in August <strong>2010</strong><br />

China’s Insurance Regulatory Commission<br />

finally gave Chinese insurance companies the<br />

green light to invest in private equity. Though<br />

investment into the asset class is capped at no<br />

more than 5 percent of their last quarter’s<br />

total assets, the new rules mean as much<br />

as RMB226 billion (€26.2 billion; $33.2<br />

billion) could enter China’s private equity<br />

market, based on total Chinese insurance<br />

industry assets of RMB4.52 trillion at the<br />

end of June.<br />

But as spending power and funds raised in<br />

RMB have increased, so too has the feeling<br />

of marginalisation from offshore LPs who<br />

have invested in China-focused USD funds<br />

with prominent local managers managing<br />

both types of fund.<br />

In a country which has one (very strict)<br />

rule for the investment of foreign money,<br />

and another (much laxer) one for local<br />

money, it is not hard to see how conflict can<br />

arise. The LP Association of China (LAPCN),<br />

which was formed three years ago by LPs<br />

such as Pantheon, Morgan Creek Capital<br />

Management and Adam Street Partners,<br />

has identified four principle areas where<br />

conflicts of interest have arisen: deal<br />

allocation; resource allocation; timing of<br />

successor funds; and economic incentives.<br />

And given the opacity of investment in<br />

Huang: RMB funding is the future in China<br />

“We have to wake up<br />

to the reality that the<br />

RMB funding source is<br />

the future in China and<br />

returns from RMB funds<br />

are likely to be better<br />

in the near future”<br />

China, LPs feel they have no real way of<br />

knowing how much manager discretion is<br />

playing a role when it comes to choosing<br />

between their USD and RMB pools.<br />

“GPs say if it’s a restricted industry then<br />

we’ll use RMB – ok I’ll buy that. Or they’ll<br />

say the entrepreneur only wants RMB – but<br />

how do you know for sure? You have to take<br />

the GP’s word for it – it’s not practical for<br />

LPs to be checking up on every deal. So you<br />

always wonder... maybe that deal could have<br />

been done in USD?” explains Jason Zhang, a<br />

Beijing-based managing director at Morgan<br />

Creek Capital Management.<br />

Despite the strain this conflict has placed<br />

on many GP-LP relationships, offshore LPs<br />

acknowledge that the growth of China’s<br />

RMB industry is not only unstoppable, but<br />

natural.<br />

“For all these years, private equity in<br />

China has meant Chinese GPs managing<br />

USD funds,” reflects Vincent Huang, a Hong<br />

Kong-based partner at Pantheon. “We have<br />

to wake up to the reality that the RMB<br />

funding source is the future in China and<br />

returns from RMB funds are likely to be<br />

better in the near future. We cannot change<br />

this; we can at best try to align interests<br />

with the GPs.”<br />

The ultimate solution would be for the<br />

government to scrap Circular 142, a 2008<br />

law from the State Administration of Foreign<br />

Exchange which restricts the conversion<br />

of foreign currency for the purposes of<br />

investment, allowing foreign and domestic<br />

LPs alike to invest into the same fund.<br />

And in October, it seemed that Shanghai<br />

had come close to doing just this when<br />

it announced it had gained in-principle<br />

approval from China’s financial authorities<br />

to launch a Qualified Foreign LP (QFLP)<br />

programme.<br />

Similar to the Qualified Foreign<br />

Institutional Investor scheme already in<br />

existence, which allows approved foreign<br />

investors access to Chinese equities, the<br />

broad aim of the QFLP would be to allow<br />

approved foreign LPs access to the domestic<br />

private equity industry.<br />

However, although a cautious welcome<br />

was expressed by China’s foreign LP<br />

community, wholesale celebrations have yet<br />

to be seen as much of the detail around the<br />

QFLP scheme still needed to be clarified. n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!