19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.6 Polymer Brushes 39<br />

The coefficients of the average polymer concentration can be expressed as<br />

φ i =<br />

V<br />

Q[w]<br />

∑<br />

I jk Γ ijk (1.180)<br />

jk<br />

where the components of the matrix, I, are defined as<br />

∫ 1<br />

I jk ≡ ds q j (s)q † k<br />

(s) (1.181)<br />

= ∑ 0<br />

[ ]<br />

exp(dm ) − exp(d n )<br />

U jm U kn¯q m (0)¯q n † (1)<br />

d<br />

m,n<br />

m − d n<br />

(1.182)<br />

Note that in the instances where d m = d n , the factor in the square brackets reduces to<br />

exp(d m ).<br />

Given the formula to evaluate the segment concentration, the coefficients of the field, w i ,<br />

can now be adjusted to satisfy the incompressibility condition, φ(z) =1, which is expressed<br />

in terms of coefficients as<br />

φ i = I i (1.183)<br />

In practice, the functional expansion has to be truncated at some value i = M, where M is<br />

chosen based on an acceptable error tolerance. In principle, the first (M +1)components, w i ,<br />

would be adjusted to satisfy the first (M +1)conditions for φ i . However, Eqs. (1.183) are not<br />

completely independent, due to the fact that SCFT is not affected <strong>by</strong> an additive constant to<br />

w(z); see the discussion at the end of Section 1.2. To rectify this problem, the first condition,<br />

φ 0 = I 0 , can be replaced <strong>by</strong><br />

∑<br />

I i w i =0 (1.184)<br />

i<br />

which sets the spatial average of w(z) to zero. Now the set of equations are independent,<br />

<strong>and</strong> they can be solved <strong>by</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard numerical techniques. There are various techniques that<br />

can be used (Thompson et al. 2004); we generally use the Broyden algorithm, which is a<br />

quasi-Newton-Raphson method. This requires a reasonable initial guess for w(z), but that can<br />

be provided <strong>by</strong> the SST estimate in Eq. (1.113). Figure 1.7 shows the field, w(z), obtained<br />

from SCFT (solid curves) for several different brush thicknesses compared against the SST<br />

result (dashed curve) from Eq. (1.113). As expected, the SST prediction becomes increasingly<br />

accurate as L →∞.<br />

We have glossed over the fact that β was introduced in order to prevent a delta function<br />

from developing in w(z) at z =0. The signature of a delta function is that the field coefficients,<br />

w i , fail to converge to zero in the limit of large i. To prevent this, we could include the<br />

extra condition, w M =0, in our Broyden iterations <strong>and</strong> use it to determine β. The estimate,<br />

β ≈ 3L/a 2 N, <strong>by</strong> Likhtman <strong>and</strong> Semenov (2000) provides a suitable initial guess. In reality,<br />

this initial guess turns out to be very accurate, <strong>and</strong> since the spectral method can cope with<br />

a small delta function, we simply use the initial guess provided <strong>by</strong> Likhtman <strong>and</strong> Semenov<br />

(2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!