19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.9 Current Track Record <strong>and</strong> Future Outlook for SCFT 71<br />

complex phase behavior of diblock copolymer melts several years in advance of experiment.<br />

At the time that SCFT predicted (<strong>Matsen</strong> <strong>and</strong> Schick 1994a) the phase diagram in Fig. 1.20,<br />

experiments had reported four stable complex phases: the double-diamond (Thomas et al.<br />

1987), the perforated-lamellar (PL) (Hamley et al. 1993), the modulated-lamellar (Hamley<br />

et al. 1993), <strong>and</strong> the gyroid (G) (Hajduk et al. 1994; Schulz et al. 1994). The existence<br />

of the modulated-lamellar phase, based solely on scattering experiments, was the least certain,<br />

<strong>and</strong> strongly conflicted with our theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the complex phase behavior<br />

(<strong>Matsen</strong> 2002b; <strong>Matsen</strong> <strong>and</strong> Bates 1996b). It is now accepted <strong>and</strong> well supported <strong>by</strong> theory<br />

(Yeung et al. 1996) that the observed scattering pattern was simply a result of anisotropic<br />

fluctuations from the classical lamellar (L) phase. Secondly, it has become apparent that the<br />

double-diamond phase was nothing more than a misidentified gyroid phase (Hajduk et al.<br />

1995), attributed to the remarkable similarities of the two microstructures, coupled with the<br />

limited resolution of scattering experiments at the time. Conversely, the perforated-lamellar<br />

phase is most definitely observed in diblock copolymer melts, but it is now accepted to be a<br />

metastable state that, given sufficient time, converts to the gyroid morphology (Hajduk et al.<br />

1997). With that final realization, experiments are now in line with the SCFT prediction that<br />

gyroid is the only stable complex phase in diblock copolymer melts. However, in more elaborate<br />

architectures, notably ABC triblock copolymers, a zoo of complex morphologies are<br />

possible (Bates <strong>and</strong> Fredrickson 1999), <strong>and</strong> SCFT is having equal success in resolving their<br />

complex phase behavior (<strong>Matsen</strong> 1998; Shefelbine et al. 1999; Wickham <strong>and</strong> Shi 2001). Another<br />

impressive accomplishment of SCFT has been the successful treatment (<strong>Matsen</strong> 1997)<br />

of a delicate symmetry-breaking transition in the grain boundary of a lamellar morphology,<br />

where a symmetric chevron boundary switches to an asymmetric omega boundary as the angle<br />

between two lamellar grains increases (Gido <strong>and</strong> Thomas 1994). Arguably, the most impressive<br />

accomplishment up to now involves the macrophase separation of chemically-equivalent<br />

small <strong>and</strong> large diblock copolymers (Hashimoto et al. 1993). The fact that SCFT is the only<br />

theory to correctly predict (<strong>Matsen</strong> 1995b) this effect is impressive in its own right, but the<br />

truly stunning achievement emerged later when Papadakis et al. (1998) purposely synthesized<br />

diblock copolymers in order to quantitatively test one of the predicted SCFT phase diagrams.<br />

The agreement between the theoretical <strong>and</strong> experimental phase boundaries is virtually perfect,<br />

which is particularly remarkable, given the fact that the competing theories fail to predict<br />

any boundaries at all. With this level of success, SCFT has unequivocally emerged as the<br />

state-of-the-art theory for structured polymeric melts.<br />

The superb track record of SCFT can be attributed to the sound approximations upon<br />

which it is built. Although the Gaussian chain model treats polymers as simple microscopic<br />

elastic threads, which may seem at first to be highly artificial, it is a well-grounded model<br />

for high-molecular-weight polymers as justified in Section 1.1. In this limit of high molecular<br />

weight, the separation between the atomic <strong>and</strong> molecular length scales allows for the<br />

effective treatment of the monomer-monomer interactions <strong>by</strong> the simple Flory-Huggins form,<br />

U[ ˆφ A , ˆφ B ], in Eq. (1.192) coupled with the incompressibility constraint, ˆφ A (r)+ ˆφ B (r) =1.<br />

Beyond these approximations in the underlying model, the only other is the saddle-point approximation,<br />

which amounts to mean-field theory. Again, this approximation becomes increasingly<br />

accurate for large invariant polymerization indices, N , where the individual polymers<br />

acquire more <strong>and</strong> more contacts with their neighboring molecules. The conventional<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing is that SCFT becomes exact in the limit of N→∞. Nevertheless, real poly-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!