19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />

mers are of finite molecular weight, <strong>and</strong> thus there is still a need for further development.<br />

1.10 Beyond SCFT: Fluctuation Corrections<br />

The main shortcoming of SCFT is that it does not properly account for composition fluctuations<br />

(<strong>Matsen</strong> 〈 2002b), 〉 where ˆφ A (r) <strong>and</strong> ˆφ B (r) deviate from their ensemble averages,<br />

〈ˆφA (r)〉<br />

<strong>and</strong> ˆφB (r) , respectively. These fluctuations are best known for disordering the<br />

weakly-segregated phases near the mean-field critical points in Figs. 1.10(b) <strong>and</strong> 1.20, but<br />

they also have some significant effects on strongly-segregated melts. In particular, capillarywave<br />

fluctuations broaden the internal interfaces in both polymer blends <strong>and</strong> block copolymer<br />

microstructures. Furthermore, fluctuations are responsible for disordering the lattice arrangement<br />

of the close-packed spherical (S cp ) phase predicted <strong>by</strong> SCFT in Fig. 1.20 for diblock<br />

copolymer melts (<strong>Matsen</strong> 2002b; Sakamoto et al. 1997; Wang et al. 2005).<br />

Composition fluctuations are often treated with the use of L<strong>and</strong>au-Ginzburg free energy<br />

expressions like those derived in Eqs. (1.217), (1.234), <strong>and</strong> (1.281). The formal procedure<br />

involves breaking the calculation of the partition function, Z, into two separate steps. For the<br />

polymer blend considered in Section 1.7.1, the procedure begins with the calculation of<br />

(<br />

1<br />

Z LG [Φ A ] ∝<br />

n A !n B ! exp − U[Φ )<br />

A, 1 − Φ A ] ∏ nA<br />

∏n B<br />

˜Dr A,α<br />

˜Dr B,β ×<br />

k B T<br />

δ[Φ A − ˆφ A ]δ[1 − Φ A − ˆφ B ] (1.311)<br />

which provides the L<strong>and</strong>au-Ginzburg free energy, F LG [Φ A ]=−k B T ln(Z LG [Φ A ]), for a<br />

fixed composition profile, Φ A (r). Next, the functional integration<br />

∫<br />

Z = DΦ A Z LG [Φ A ] (1.312)<br />

is performed over all possible compositions. While it is obvious that these steps reproduce<br />

the result of Eq. (1.195), F LG [Φ A ] is no easier to calculate than the actual free energy, F =<br />

−k B T ln Z, of the system.<br />

To proceed, the L<strong>and</strong>au-Ginzburg free energy can be approximated <strong>by</strong> the methods of<br />

SCFT. It may seem odd to correct the SCFT prediction for F <strong>by</strong> using the SCFT prediction<br />

for F LG [Φ A ], but SCFT is better suited to the latter problem, where the composition is not<br />

permitted to fluctuate. Still, the SCFT calculation of F LG [Φ A ] can run into problems, because<br />

it only constrains the average concentration of A segments [i.e.,<br />

〈ˆφA (r)〉<br />

=Φ A (r)] rather<br />

than the actual concentration [i.e., ˆφ A (r) =Φ A (r)]. For well-segregated compositions, where<br />

Φ A (r) is generally close to either zero or one, there is little distinction between constraining<br />

ˆφ A (r) as opposed to its ensemble average, <strong>and</strong> therefore the method works well. The treatment<br />

of capillary-wave fluctuations in both polymer blends <strong>and</strong> block copolymer microstructures<br />

agrees well with experiment (Sferrazza et al. 1997; Shull et al. 1993). However, for the most<br />

widely used application (Fredrickson <strong>and</strong> Helf<strong>and</strong> 1987) on the Brazovskii fluctuations (Brazovskii<br />

1975) of weakly-segregated block copolymer melts, this L<strong>and</strong>au-Ginzburg treatment<br />

is questionable. It predicts the ODT in Fig. 1.20 to shift upwards destroying the mean-field<br />

α=1<br />

β=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!