19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />

expressed as<br />

ˆφ A (r) = N ρ 0<br />

∑n A ∫ 1<br />

α=1<br />

0<br />

ds δ(r − r A,α (s)) (1.188)<br />

with an analogous expression specifying the B-segment concentration, ˆφB (r).<br />

With the inclusion of two chemically distinct segments, it is no longer possible to sidestep<br />

the issue of monomer-monomer interactions. For discussion purposes, assume that the<br />

interaction between two monomers, i <strong>and</strong> j, obeys a simple Lennard-Jones potential,<br />

[ ( ) 12 ( ) ] 6 σ<br />

σ<br />

u(r ij )=ɛ − 2<br />

(1.189)<br />

r ij r ij<br />

where r ij is their separation. The incompressibility assumption<br />

ˆφ A (r)+ˆφ B (r) =1 (1.190)<br />

acts to maintain the spacing between neighboring monomers at the minimum of the potential<br />

energy, r ij = σ. The detailed shape of the potential is therefore no longer needed; we can<br />

simply assume that the interaction energy is −ɛ between neighboring monomers <strong>and</strong> zero<br />

otherwise. In the brush system, all the interactions were the same <strong>and</strong> thus they added up<br />

to a constant energy that could be ignored, assuming the total number of monomer contacts<br />

remained more or less fixed. In the blend, however, we must account for the fact that the<br />

depth of the potential will differ between the A-A, A-B, <strong>and</strong> B-B contacts. Noting that the<br />

range of the monomer-monomer interactions, σ, is negligible on the coarse-grained scale, the<br />

interactions can be treated as contact energies <strong>and</strong> thus the internal energy can be expressed<br />

as<br />

U ≡− N 2 ɛ AA<br />

∑<br />

∫<br />

2ρ 2 ds dt δ(r A,α (s) − r A,β (t)) −<br />

0 α,β<br />

N 2 ɛ AB<br />

∑<br />

∫<br />

ρ 2 ds dt δ(r A,α (s) − r B,β (t)) −<br />

0 α,β<br />

N 2 ɛ BB<br />

∑<br />

∫<br />

2ρ 2 ds dt δ(r B,α (s) − r B,β (t)) (1.191)<br />

0<br />

α,β<br />

Using the incompressibility assumption, ˆφ A (r)+ ˆφ B (r) =1, this simplifies to<br />

U[ ˆφ A , ˆφ B ]<br />

k B T<br />

= χρ 0<br />

∫<br />

dr ˆφ A (r) ˆφ B (r) (1.192)<br />

where the interaction strengths are grouped together into a single dimensionless parameter,<br />

χ ≡ ɛ AA − 2ɛ AB + ɛ BB<br />

2k B Tρ 0<br />

(1.193)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!