Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
[21] They both commented favourably about the presence <strong>of</strong> the Street<br />
Connections van that toured the streets and gave practical advice about<br />
keeping safe on the streets — from bad dates and diseases. Secondly, they<br />
supported the availability <strong>of</strong> a drop-in centre run by Ma Mawi, a place to get<br />
<strong>of</strong>f the streets to relax and get information if they wished.<br />
[22] However, most poignantly and importantly, the request for<br />
information and education from peers that have been there. People that will<br />
"tell it straight — this is what happens — and the effects <strong>of</strong> it". Usually<br />
because <strong>of</strong> their backgrounds these youths'rust <strong>of</strong> people is non-existent<br />
and until that trust is established the educational process will not have too<br />
much effect. Trust takes time.<br />
[23] How did these kids get here? The experts testified in detail about how<br />
this can occur but with the three individuals in question including Tracia<br />
Owen the last stop before the streets was a group home in the area. It would<br />
appear, probably due to cost <strong>of</strong> housing, the group homes are in the very<br />
area that the activity — drugs and sexual exploitation is prevalent.<br />
[24] But it is crystal clear this activity by these youths is not voluntary in<br />
the sense we understand the word. To make the myriad <strong>of</strong> problems go<br />
away, drugs and the means to obtain the drugs, consume their lives.<br />
[25] The inquest was told the ages <strong>of</strong> these youths were from 11-17and<br />
some were younger. It should be absolutely clear to all <strong>of</strong> society, children<br />
in these age categories neither have the judgment nor maturity to live a<br />
secure life. Both our common sense when we raise our own children and the<br />
laws <strong>of</strong> our country with respect to both child welfare laws and laws under<br />
the Criminal<br />
Code, dictate youth <strong>of</strong> this age are not capable <strong>of</strong> exercising<br />
good judgment nor possess sufficient knowledge to do so. That is why all<br />
manner <strong>of</strong> laws allow parents to guide, inform and educate their children<br />
until they are capable <strong>of</strong> making those decisions <strong>of</strong> safety and health, etc. on<br />
their own. Isn't that what raising a child is all about — educating, advising,<br />
preparing them to make the best decision. When this process breaks down,<br />
for whatever reason, society needs to step in to protect this most valuable<br />
resource — our children. These statements may sound platitudinous to some,<br />
trite to others, but are they nevertheless true? Our laws, supported by our<br />
moral and ethical standards, certainly mirror these precepts — protection <strong>of</strong><br />
our young.<br />
[26] If I am correct, then it is difficult to understand why there is not public<br />
outrage about fourteen year old children standing on the street at all times <strong>of</strong><br />
the day and night selling their bodies to support a drug addiction.