22.05.2014 Views

Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

Affidavit of Michael Bear - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[21] They both commented favourably about the presence <strong>of</strong> the Street<br />

Connections van that toured the streets and gave practical advice about<br />

keeping safe on the streets — from bad dates and diseases. Secondly, they<br />

supported the availability <strong>of</strong> a drop-in centre run by Ma Mawi, a place to get<br />

<strong>of</strong>f the streets to relax and get information if they wished.<br />

[22] However, most poignantly and importantly, the request for<br />

information and education from peers that have been there. People that will<br />

"tell it straight — this is what happens — and the effects <strong>of</strong> it". Usually<br />

because <strong>of</strong> their backgrounds these youths'rust <strong>of</strong> people is non-existent<br />

and until that trust is established the educational process will not have too<br />

much effect. Trust takes time.<br />

[23] How did these kids get here? The experts testified in detail about how<br />

this can occur but with the three individuals in question including Tracia<br />

Owen the last stop before the streets was a group home in the area. It would<br />

appear, probably due to cost <strong>of</strong> housing, the group homes are in the very<br />

area that the activity — drugs and sexual exploitation is prevalent.<br />

[24] But it is crystal clear this activity by these youths is not voluntary in<br />

the sense we understand the word. To make the myriad <strong>of</strong> problems go<br />

away, drugs and the means to obtain the drugs, consume their lives.<br />

[25] The inquest was told the ages <strong>of</strong> these youths were from 11-17and<br />

some were younger. It should be absolutely clear to all <strong>of</strong> society, children<br />

in these age categories neither have the judgment nor maturity to live a<br />

secure life. Both our common sense when we raise our own children and the<br />

laws <strong>of</strong> our country with respect to both child welfare laws and laws under<br />

the Criminal<br />

Code, dictate youth <strong>of</strong> this age are not capable <strong>of</strong> exercising<br />

good judgment nor possess sufficient knowledge to do so. That is why all<br />

manner <strong>of</strong> laws allow parents to guide, inform and educate their children<br />

until they are capable <strong>of</strong> making those decisions <strong>of</strong> safety and health, etc. on<br />

their own. Isn't that what raising a child is all about — educating, advising,<br />

preparing them to make the best decision. When this process breaks down,<br />

for whatever reason, society needs to step in to protect this most valuable<br />

resource — our children. These statements may sound platitudinous to some,<br />

trite to others, but are they nevertheless true? Our laws, supported by our<br />

moral and ethical standards, certainly mirror these precepts — protection <strong>of</strong><br />

our young.<br />

[26] If I am correct, then it is difficult to understand why there is not public<br />

outrage about fourteen year old children standing on the street at all times <strong>of</strong><br />

the day and night selling their bodies to support a drug addiction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!