here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1663 6 JUNE 2013 Onshore Wind (Planning Policy) 1664<br />
Onshore Wind (Planning Policy)<br />
10.30 am<br />
Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry) (Con) (Urgent<br />
Question): To ask the Minister for Housing if he will<br />
make a statement on planning policy in relation to<br />
onshore wind.<br />
The Minister for Housing (Mr Mark Prisk): The<br />
coalition agreement pledged to decentralise power to<br />
local people. We are committed to giving local people<br />
far more ability to shape the places in which they live.<br />
Through a series of reforms, this coalition Government<br />
are making the planning process more accessible to<br />
local communities. Planning works best when communities<br />
themselves have the opportunity to influence the decisions<br />
that affect their lives. However, current planning decisions<br />
on onshore wind do not always reflect a locally led<br />
planning system.<br />
Following a wide range of representations, including<br />
the letter of 30 January 2012 to the Prime Minister from<br />
100 hon. Members, and in light of the Department of<br />
Energy and Climate Change’s call for evidence, it has<br />
become clear that action is needed to deliver the balance<br />
expected by the national planning policy framework.<br />
We need to ensure that protecting the local environment<br />
is properly considered alongside the broader issues of<br />
protecting the global environment. Today my right hon.<br />
Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate<br />
Change has published the response to his call for evidence<br />
on onshore wind and my right hon. Friend the Secretary<br />
of State for Communities and Local Government is<br />
publishing a written ministerial statement that will set<br />
out a number of key changes that I know the House will<br />
wish to consider. Let me set out the key elements for the<br />
benefit of the House and my hon. Friend the Member<br />
for Daventry (Chris Heaton-Harris).<br />
First, we want to strengthen the voice of local people.<br />
The submissions to the call for evidence have highlighted<br />
the benefits of good quality pre-application discussions<br />
for onshore wind development and the improved outcomes<br />
they can have for local communities. We will amend<br />
secondary legislation to make pre-application consultation<br />
with local communities compulsory for the more significant<br />
onshore wind applications. This will ensure that community<br />
engagement takes place at an earlier stage and may<br />
assist in improving the quality of proposed onshore<br />
wind development. It will also complement the community<br />
benefits proposals announced by the Secretary of State<br />
for Energy and Climate Change.<br />
Secondly, on better planning guidance, the national<br />
planning policy framework we published last year includes<br />
strong protections for the natural and historic environment.<br />
However, I know that local communities have genuine<br />
concerns that insufficient weight is being given to<br />
environmental considerations such as landscape, amenity<br />
or heritage. We need to ensure that decisions get the<br />
environmental balance right, in line with the framework,<br />
and that any adverse impact from a wind farm development<br />
is addressed satisfactorily.<br />
We have been equally clear that this means facilitating<br />
sustainable development in suitable locations. Put simply,<br />
meeting our energy goals should not be used to justify<br />
the wrong development in the wrong location. We are<br />
looking to local councils to include in their local plans<br />
policies that ensure that adverse impacts from wind<br />
farm developments, including cumulative landscape and<br />
visual impact, are addressed satisfactorily. W<strong>here</strong> councils<br />
have identified areas suitable for onshore wind, they<br />
should not feel they have to give permission for speculative<br />
applications outside those areas when they judge the<br />
impact to be unacceptable.<br />
To help to ensure that planning decisions reflect the<br />
balance in the framework, my Department will shortly<br />
issue new planning practice guidance to assist local<br />
councils and planning inspectors in their consideration<br />
of local plans and individual applications. Briefly, the<br />
guidance will set out, first, that the need for renewable<br />
energy does not automatically override environmental<br />
protections and the planning concerns of local communities.<br />
Secondly, decisions should take into account the cumulative<br />
impact of wind turbines and properly reflect the increasing<br />
impact on the landscape and local amenity. Thirdly,<br />
local topography should be a factor in assessing whether<br />
wind turbines have a damaging impact on the landscape.<br />
Fourthly, great care should be taken to ensure that<br />
heritage assets are conserved in a manner appropriate<br />
to their significance, including the impact of proposals<br />
on views important to their setting.<br />
We will be writing to the Planning Inspectorate and<br />
to all councils to flag up the new guidance and its<br />
operation. This Government firmly believe that renewables<br />
have an important role to play in a balanced energy<br />
policy. However, as a localist Government, we also firmly<br />
believe that planning works best when local people are<br />
able to shape their local environment.<br />
Chris Heaton-Harris: Thank you for granting this<br />
urgent question, Mr Speaker. I should like to draw the<br />
House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’<br />
Financial Interests.<br />
I thank the Minister for his reply, but it is a shame<br />
that this was not announced to the House first. Should<br />
the Department of Energy and Climate Change have<br />
been briefing the media on this announcement 24 hours<br />
before it was announced in this place, especially when<br />
its planning element comes from the Department for<br />
Communities and Local Government and is time-sensitive<br />
and commercially significant? What will be the impact<br />
of the policy change on proposed developments that<br />
are currently in the planning process, particularly those<br />
that are in the planning appeals system and whose<br />
appeal has been concluded but the result is not yet<br />
known? Will the proposed change be retrospective for<br />
schemes that have been granted planning permission<br />
against the wishes of the local communities or councils,<br />
but whose construction has not yet started?<br />
For too long, developers have ridden roughshod over<br />
the views of local communities and local councils on<br />
inappropriately sited wind turbines. Can the Minister<br />
elaborate on how the new policy will be communicated<br />
to the Planning Inspectorate and local planning authorities,<br />
and on the timeline that will be involved?<br />
T<strong>here</strong> might have been some confusion within<br />
Government Departments about these matters, but I<br />
wholeheartedly welcome the planning changes. I really<br />
believe that this could be the beginning of the end of<br />
unwanted onshore wind farm development in England,<br />
and I welcome the Minister’s statement.<br />
Several hon. Members rose—