here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1687 Business of the House<br />
6 JUNE 2013<br />
Business of the House<br />
1688<br />
Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab): May<br />
we have a debate on Ministers’responsiveness to Members?<br />
I wrote to the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury on<br />
behalf of my constituent Karen Bawker of Thorneside,<br />
Denton, on 4 April in follow-up to correspondence on<br />
11 January, which was answered by him on 4 February.<br />
This time I have not had so much as an acknowledgement,<br />
let alone a reply, despite my having sent reminders,<br />
including most recently at the start of this week. Will the<br />
Leader of the House investigate this discourtesy and,<br />
through his good offices, also ensure that my constituent’s<br />
query is responded to?<br />
Mr Lansley: I will of course be in touch with my hon.<br />
Friend the Exchequer Secretary, who I know is an<br />
assiduous and hard-working Minister. Like all of us, he<br />
seeks to respond to Members’ correspondence within<br />
20 working days, and I am sure he will want to address<br />
the reasons he has failed to do so in this instance.<br />
Richard Fuller (Bedford) (Con): May we have a statement<br />
from the Government about streamlining procedures at<br />
Companies House better to support people trying to<br />
start a business for the first time? A constituent of mine<br />
had his form returned because it was in the wrong<br />
colour ink, and when he sought advice and guidance<br />
from Companies House he was told simply, “Look at<br />
our website.” When he re-filed to ensure that it was<br />
absolutely correct, Companies House returned it, having<br />
identified errors that it had missed first time, and then<br />
he was fined £375 and told that he was liable to prosecution<br />
for a criminal offence. I think we can do better in<br />
encouraging business.<br />
Mr Lansley: It is not a happy tale my hon. Friend<br />
tells. I know that my hon. Friends at the Department for<br />
Business, Innovation and Skills will want to look at<br />
that. When we tackle red tape, as we are doing, we<br />
should not just be reducing the burden of regulation by<br />
taking away unnecessary regulations and simplifying<br />
others, but looking constantly—the Cabinet Office is<br />
leading on this across Government—at simplifying<br />
administration and reducing costs on those who have to<br />
comply with regulations.<br />
Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con): Last week, I<br />
made a most enjoyable and informative visit to the<br />
National Coal Mining museum near Wakefield, which<br />
adjoins my constituency. It was packed with families<br />
and children. I, too, would like to add my voice to the<br />
calls for a debate on our wonderful national museums<br />
and how best to support them financially during these<br />
difficult economic times.<br />
Mr Lansley: I completely understand what my hon.<br />
Friend says. He will recall what I said about the Science<br />
Museum Group more generally. In that particular instance,<br />
although these are operational matters within the group,<br />
I understand that t<strong>here</strong> is a £2.5 million per annum<br />
ring-fenced grant for the National Coal Mining museum.<br />
Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry) (Con): In the light of<br />
the three debates on European documents that the<br />
Leader of the House announced, will he bring forward<br />
fresh proposals to enhance how the House and national<br />
<strong>Parliament</strong>s deal with European legislation?<br />
Mr Lansley: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. As<br />
happy chance would have it, the Foreign Secretary is on<br />
the Front Bench alongside me. Last week in Berlin, he<br />
set out what I think is essential—I think both sides of<br />
the House might agree with this—<br />
Mr Douglas Alexander (Paisley and Renfrewshire<br />
South) (Lab) indicated assent.<br />
Mr Lansley: Yes, I am saying that we can agree about<br />
it. We should increase the influence of national <strong>Parliament</strong>s<br />
over legislation, for the achievement of which my right<br />
hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has set out specific<br />
proposals. As Leader of the House, I want to work not<br />
least with the European Scrutiny Committee and the<br />
Liaison Committee to ensure that we use every opportunity<br />
to the maximum, identifying proposals as they come<br />
from the European Commission, intervening as early as<br />
possible, sending our political and reasoned opinions<br />
on the legislation and maximising our influence over<br />
EU legislation.<br />
Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con): May I remind<br />
the Leader of the House about private Members’ Bills<br />
and the days allocated to them? In the last Session the<br />
Government tabled a motion, which was passed by the<br />
House, to increase the number of sitting days for private<br />
Members’ Bills, so I am afraid that hiding behind<br />
Standing Orders to suggest that we cannot increase the<br />
number of sitting days for private Members’ Bills is not<br />
quite correct. May we have a statement on that?<br />
Mr Lansley: I never like to disagree with my hon.<br />
Friend, but in that instance I think we brought forward<br />
a motion for the House additionally to sit on a Friday,<br />
but not for the consideration of private Members’ Bills—<br />
rather, it was for the extension of a debate. If I am<br />
wrong, I will gladly confess and correct that. As far as<br />
I am aware, the issue is simply put. The number of<br />
days—13—is set out in Standing Orders.<br />
Nigel Adams (Selby and Ainsty) (Con): Sport, as we<br />
know, plays a crucial part in the development of young<br />
people. May we have a debate on the work of sports<br />
clubs in the community? By coincidence, 150 years ago<br />
the Yorkshire county cricket club played its first ever<br />
official cricket match <strong>here</strong> in London, across the river,<br />
against Surrey. One-hundred and fifty years ago today,<br />
Yorkshire skittled out Surrey for 60 runs in the second<br />
innings. The Leader of the House will know the names:<br />
Hawke, Sutcliffe, Trueman, Close, Boycott, Gough,<br />
Lehmann, Vaughan—all Yorkshire sporting legends who<br />
have played for a club that does incredible good work in<br />
our community. As well as the debate, will the Leader of<br />
the House join me in congratulating Yorkshire on its<br />
anniversary? Will he also join me on Monday for a<br />
reception on the Terrace for Yorkshire county cricket<br />
club, w<strong>here</strong> he will get to meet the great Geoffrey<br />
Boycott and the current Yorkshire squad?<br />
Mr Speaker: The hon. Gentleman has had a very full<br />
innings.<br />
Mr Lansley: Who can resist? I absolutely endorse that<br />
celebration and commemoration in this House. Let me<br />
say how much we applaud Yorkshire county cricket<br />
club for its many achievements over 150 years. It would