here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1689 Business of the House<br />
6 JUNE 2013<br />
Business of the House<br />
1690<br />
[Mr Lansley]<br />
be the greatest possible pleasure to meet some of those<br />
who have contributed to them. Cricket clubs in Yorkshire<br />
and across the country play a vital part in promoting<br />
sport and community life. Yorkshire has been at the<br />
forefront of that, and I hope we can celebrate that on<br />
Monday.<br />
Martin Vickers (Cleethorpes) (Con): It is widely<br />
anticipated that a decision on the future of the children’s<br />
heart surgery unit in Leeds will be known soon. T<strong>here</strong><br />
has been a wide campaign across the House, involving<br />
many Members. Can the Leader of the House assure us<br />
that when a decision is made, t<strong>here</strong> will be an oral<br />
statement?<br />
Mr Lansley: I will, of course, talk to my right hon.<br />
Friend the Secretary of State for Health. I am not aware<br />
that he has received, or made any decision in relation to,<br />
an independent reconfiguration panel report, but I will<br />
of course discuss with him how an announcement will<br />
be made in due course.<br />
Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Earlier this<br />
week you confirmed from the Chair, Mr Speaker, that<br />
the Standing Orders of the House permit only the<br />
Government to make a formal request to recall <strong>Parliament</strong>.<br />
Given that Governments can be tempted to make major<br />
policy announcements during the recess and given that<br />
the Leader of the House is, after all, the leader of all of<br />
us in this place, would he be kind enough to give<br />
consideration to amending the relevant Standing Order,<br />
so that if a certain threshold—for example, 20%—of<br />
Members requesting a recall were met, they would be<br />
able to use that mechanism to make a formal request?<br />
Mr Lansley: Of course, my hon. Friend understands<br />
that I take very seriously my responsibility to represent<br />
both the Government in this House and the House as a<br />
whole, including within the councils of Government.<br />
From my point of view, in my recent experience I do not<br />
see any mischief—in the sense that t<strong>here</strong> have been<br />
issues on which it was thought appropriate for the<br />
House to be recalled when Ministers did not take a<br />
suitable initiative—but I will keep this under review.<br />
Glyn Davies (Montgomeryshire) (Con): This morning<br />
the Government issued an important statement about<br />
the public voice in relation to onshore wind farms.<br />
Three times this morning you have called me, Mr Speaker,<br />
and I have asked a similar question about how the<br />
statement will affect Wales. I have not received a satisfactory<br />
answer. I have been left in a position of deep frustration,<br />
and I am sure the people of Wales feel the same. Will<br />
my right hon. Friend ensure that we have an early<br />
statement clarifying the position, so that people in<br />
Wales will know that applications for developments<br />
over 50 MW, which are not devolved, will be subject to<br />
today’s new guidelines?<br />
Mr Lansley: I completely understand my hon. Friend’s<br />
concern about this, and his desire to secure proper<br />
answers. If I may, I will talk to my right hon. Friend the<br />
Secretary of State for Wales to see how we might<br />
expedite a response.<br />
Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con):<br />
Engineering businesses in my constituency have told me<br />
of the challenges that they face in recruiting, particularly<br />
in relation to the academic backgrounds of applicants.<br />
They are looking for achievement in computer sciences,<br />
mathematics and physics. May we please have a debate<br />
to discuss what more the Government could do to<br />
encourage participation in those critical subjects, and to<br />
ensure high standards in the curriculum and rigour in<br />
the examinations?<br />
Mr Lansley: From my point of view, I am clear that<br />
my ministerial colleagues in the Department for Education<br />
and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills<br />
are working closely together to ensure that we maximise<br />
our support for education and training in science,<br />
technology and engineering. The first job I ever did,<br />
many years ago, was in the then Department of Industry,<br />
and it was to support the Young Engineer for Britain<br />
scheme and Women into Science and Engineering. This<br />
has been a long, hard struggle, but companies today still<br />
feel that we in this country do not attach as much<br />
importance to science, technology and mathematics as<br />
other countries do. We have made significant progress<br />
recently in the number of students following those<br />
subjects and the success that they are achieving, but we<br />
still need to attach greater importance to encouraging<br />
the brightest and best to go into engineering and<br />
manufacturing industry.<br />
Mark Pawsey (Rugby) (Con): Almost exactly 12 months<br />
ago, I raised with the then Leader of the House my<br />
concerns about a stretch of the M6 that has become<br />
known as “Rugby’s mad mile” because of the large<br />
number of accidents in the traffic queuing to join the<br />
A14 at Catthorpe. His response was that funds had<br />
been allocated for improvements, but that a public<br />
inquiry was needed. Twelve months on, we are waiting<br />
for the outcome of that public inquiry, but accidents are<br />
continuing to happen, with yet another fatality occurring<br />
only last week. Given the importance of that junction<br />
to the UK motorway network, may we have a ministerial<br />
statement on the progress on bringing forward those<br />
urgently needed improvements?<br />
Mr Lansley: As somebody who lives down the A14 in<br />
an eastward direction, I am only too familiar with the<br />
Catthorpe interchange. My hon. Friend will know that<br />
the local public inquiry into the proposed improvement<br />
of junction 19 and related sections of the M6 and A14<br />
closed on 16 March this year. The Department for<br />
Transport received the inspector’s report on 16 May.<br />
The report is currently being considered, and a decision<br />
will be issued as soon as possible. Subject to a satisfactory<br />
outcome of this statutory process, the Highways Agency<br />
expects that construction could start in the spring of<br />
2014. That would be sooner than the date announced in<br />
the Chancellor’s 2011 autumn statement, when it was<br />
stated that the scheme would be prepared for start of<br />
construction before 2015.<br />
Julian Sturdy (York Outer) (Con): May I add my<br />
voice to the call for a debate on the importance of local<br />
museums and the way in which they protect our culture<br />
and heritage for future generations? An example is the<br />
fantastic National Railway museum in York, which I